ML17174A794
| ML17174A794 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Dresden  |
| Issue date: | 07/15/1991 |
| From: | Greenman E NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Reed C COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17174A795 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9107230163 | |
| Download: ML17174A794 (2) | |
See also: IR 05000237/1991016
Text
UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
Docket No. 50-237
Docket No. 50-249
Commonwealth Edison Company
ATTN:
Mr. Cordell Reed
Senior Vice President
Opus West III
1400 Opus Place
Downers Grove, IL 60515
Dear Mr. Reed:
REGION Ill.
799 ROOSEVELT ROAD
G.LEN ELLYN, ILLINOIS 60137.
This refers to the routine safety inspection conducted by W. Rogers, D. Hills,
M, Peck, M. Phillips, D. Butler, J. Schapker, and R. Lerch of this office and
assisted by R. Zuffa of the Illinois Department of Nuclear Safety on May 17
through June 28, 1991, of activities at Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Units 2
and 3 authorized by NRC Operating License Nos. DPR-19 and DPR-25 and to the
discussion of our findings with Mr. E. Eenigenburg and others at the conclusion
of the inspection.
The enclosed copy of ou~ inspection report identifies areas examined during
the inspection. *Within these areas, the inspection consisted of a selective
examination of procedures and representative records, observations, and
interviews with personnel.
During this inspection, certain of your activities appeared to be in violation
of NRC requirements as described in the enclosed Notice.
A written response
is required.
With regards to the event of June 13 and 14, 1991, our review
identified several concerns relating to your performance of a reportability
determination pursuant to 10 CFR 50.72.
These concerns are discussed in
paragraph 8.c of the enclosed inspection report.
As the violation discussed
in paragraph 3 of the report dealt with a 10 CFR 50.72 report, you are
requested to also review these concerns and inform us in writing of your
conclusions within 30 days of the date of this letter. Also during this
inspection, certain of your other activities appeared to be in violation of
NRC requirements.
However, as described in the enclosed inspection report,
the violation was categorized at Severity Level V and it is not being cited
because the criteria specified in Section V.A. of the "General Statement of
Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions, (Enforcement Policy,
10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1991), were satisfied.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790, of the Commission's regulations, a copy of
this letter and the enclosure(s) will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room .
\\ )
I
I
(
fiil,.,1Ut
I
. r y
I
I! ,.
1*: ,**,
L.;,d'.) ( 1.J
(/
Commonwealth Edison Company
2
JUL 1 5 1991
The responses directed by this letter (and the accompanying Notice) are not
subject to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as
required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.
We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.
Enclosure:
1.
2.
Inspection Reports
No. 50-237/91016(DRP);
No. 50-249/91015(DRP)
cc w/enclosure:
D. Galle, Vice President - BWR
Operations
T. Kovach, Nuclear
Licensing Manager
E. D. Eenigenburg, Station Manager
DCD/DCB (RIDS)
OC/LFDCB
Resident Inspectors LaSalle,
Dresden, Quad Cities
Richard Hubbard
J. W. McCaffrey, Chief, Public
Utilities Division
Robert Newmann, Office of Public
Counsel, State of Illinois Center
Licensing Project Manager, NRR
C. J. Paperiello, RIII
Sincerely,
Edt%!~1rector
Division of Reactor Projects