ML17156B098
| ML17156B098 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Susquehanna  |
| Issue date: | 03/30/1989 |
| From: | Blough A, Young F NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17156B097 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-387-89-08-MM, 50-387-89-8-MM, 50-388-89-08, 50-388-89-8, NUDOCS 8904120503 | |
| Download: ML17156B098 (96) | |
See also: IR 05000387/1989008
Text
~
'r
U.S.
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION I
Meeting
Nos ~
Docket
Nos ~
License Nos.:
Licensee:
50-387/89-'08
50-388/89-08
50-387
50"388
NPF-22
Power
and Light Company
2 North Ninth Street
Allentown, Pennsylvania
18101
Facility Name:
Susquehanna
Steam Electric Station
Meeting At:
Region I, King of Prussia,
Meeting Conducted:
March 21,
1989
Reviewed
By:jn Francis
.
Young, Senior Resident
Inspector
Susquehanna
Steam Electric Statio'n
Date
Approved By:
A. Randy
ough, Chief
Reactor
Projects
Section
No.
3B
Division of Reactor
Projects
Date
A management
meeting
was
held at
NRC
Region I
on
March 21,
1989,
to discuss
(1) the licensee's
review and lessons
learned
from the
1988 refueling outage at
Unit
2,
and
(2) the
licensee's
plans,
including
scheduled
activities
and
management
controls
to
be
applied,
for upcoming refueling outages
at Units
1
and 2.
Results:
Licensee
presentations
were
thorough
and
were responsive
to
NRC Region I needs
for information.
Based
on this presentation, it appears
that the licensee
has
performed appropriate
review of the
1988 Unit 2 outage
and is prepared
to apply
the resultant
lessons
learned
to future outages.
8904120503
890330
ADOCK 05000387
9
p
~
~
1.0
Pur ose'nd
Attendees
DETAILS'
The
meeting
was
held
to
discuss
(1) the
licensee's
review
and
lessons
learned
from the
1988
Unit
2
refueling
outage
and
(2) the
licensee's
plans,
including
scheduled
activities
and
management
controls
to
be
applied, for the
1989 refueling outages
at both units.
The meeting
was attended
by those
persons listed in Attachment
1.
2. 0 M~iS
After brief opening
remarks
by the
NRC Region:I
Reactor
Projects
Section
Chief
and
the
licensee's
Senior
Vice President
Nuclear,
the
licensee
presented
detailed
discussions
on:
licensee
management
values;
outage
lessons
learned;
1989 management
initiatives;
1989 outage plans,
scheduled
activities,
and
management
controls;
and
nuclear
safety
during
outages.
Attachment
2 contains
copies
of the
overhead projector transparencies
used
by the licensee.
Each presentation
led to detailed,
open discussions
among
the various
NRC and licensee participants.
The meeting lasted .about
two and one-half hours.
3.0
Conclusion
,The
licensee
was -well-prepared
for the
meeting
and their presentations
were
responsive
to
NRC information
needs.
The
meeting
provided
a
forum
for frank exchange
of information.
Based
on the licensee's
presentations,
it appeared
that
the
licensee
has
performed
an
appropriately
detailed
review of the
1988 Unit 2 refueling
outage
and is prepared
to apply the
resultant
lessons
learned
to future outages.
Attachments:
1.
Heeting Attendees
2.
Licensee
Presentation.
Materials
ATTACHMENT 1
'uta
e
Less'on's
L'earn'ed Meetin
'-" March'21
1989
Attendees'enns
lvania Power
and Li ht
Com an
H.
W.
R.
G.
A.
M.
J.
R.
H.
G.
E. A.
F.
S.
D.
F.
R.
L.
F.
G.
Keiser, Senior Vice President - Nuclear
Byram, Plant Superintendent
Male, Manager - Nuclear Plant Engineering
Miltenberger,
Manager - Nuclear Safety Assessment
Stanley,
Assi stant Superintendent
Outages
Heckman,
Licensing Group Supervisor
Gruscavage,
Site Supervisor
Nuclear Safety Assessment
Roth, Senior Compliance
Engineer
Doty, Supervisor - Radiological
& Environmental
Services
Butler, Manager - Nuclear Design
Atlantic Electric
L. Fink, Project Supervisor
United States
Nuclear
Re viator
Commission
J.
T. Wiggins, Chief, Reactor Projects
Branch
No. 3, Division of Reactor
Projects
(DRP)
A.
R. Blough, Chief, Reactor Projects Section,
38,
F. I. Young, Senior Resident
Inspector
J.
R. Stair,
Resident
Inspector
T. T. Martin, Director, Division of Reactor Safety
(DRS)
N. J.
Blumberg, Chief, Operations
Section,
B. Clayton,
Regional
Coordinator, Office of the Executive Director for
Operations
.
M. Thadani,
Project Manager, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
ATTACHMENT 2
. OUTAGE MANAGEMENT..ATTRIBUTES.
o
OUTAGES PLANNED INDEPTH AND MELL EXECUTED
o
DYNAMIC OUTAGE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
o
STRONG
MANAGEMENT TEAM
'I
o
FUNDAMENTAL VALUE:
LEARN FROM OUR EXPERIENCES
o
MATERIAL CONDITION IS EXCELLENT
o
'NVOLVEMENT OF ENTIRE ORGANIZATION
o
COMPREHENSIVE INDEPENDENT PRE-OUTAGE ASSESSMENTS-
~
r
~
~
~
~
NUCLEAR DEPARTMENT VALUES
~
~
r
k
MISSION:
TO ACHIEVE EXCELLENCE IN THE OPERATION,
MAINTENANCE AND
SUPPORT
OF
SUSQUEHANNA AND BY SO DOING. BE RECOGNIZED
ONE OF THE BEST NUCLEAR UTILITY ORGANIZATIONS IN THE
UNITED STATES.
o
HIGH STANDARDS:
THE FOUNDATION OF EXCELLENCE
o
EMPLOYEES:
OUR MOST VALUABLE ASSET
o
IMPROVEMENT:
FROM EVENTS
AND EMPLOYEES
o
TEAMWORK:
OUR ORGANIZATIONAL CLIMATE
o
PERFORMANCE:
THE MEASUREMENT OF SUCCESS
o
RISING EXPECTATIONS:
THE CHALLENGE OF THE FUTURE
o
PLANNING
o
PEOPLE:
NAJOR THPIE FOR 1988
o
TMO EXAMPLES OF PIPLOYEE INVOLVPlENT
UNIT 2 2ND REFUEL TASK FORCE
MAINTENANCE OER
o
1989 INITIATIVES
PLANNING CYCLE
1986
1987
1988
="
. 1989
UNIT 'nv
UNIT 2 1sT
UNIT 1 3RD
UNIT 2 2so
UNIT 1 0z4
UNIT 2 3Rn
OUTAGE CRITIQUE
QOOFAOE CRIIIQ
FORCE
PLAHNIHG
CONFERENCE
0
SALP REPORT
PLANING
CONFEllENCE
PLANNIH6
CONFERENCE
SALP REPORT
PLANNING
COHFEREN
INPO RE
.INPO REPORT
IATIVE
D
NEM INITIATIVES AND
SOURCES
OF
INFORMATION
INTERNAL
DEFICIENCY CONTROL
PROGRAMS
o
SOOR
. o
o,
LER
NQA
o
SURVEILLANCES
o
AUDITS
NSAG
o
ROUTINE REVIEWS
o
SPECIAL REVIEWS
PERFORMANCE
ENHANCEMENT TEAMS
OUTAGE CRITIQUES
TASK SPECIFIC
REVIEMS
ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS
o
o
NUCLEAR SERVICES
EXTERNAL
NRC
o
INSPECTIONS
o
o
o
ROUTINE
o
. OUTAGE.
o
ASSISTANCE'NSURANCE
COMPANIES
NSAG
NQA
NRC
INITIATIVES
TASK
REVIEWS
OUTAGE
CRITIQUE
ANNUAL
ASSESSMENTS
~
PLANNING
o
PEOPLE:
MAJOR THEME FOR 1988
o
TWO EXAMPLES OF
EMPLOYEE INVOLVEMENT
UNIT 2 2ND REFUEL TASK FORCE
MAINTENANCE OER
o
1989 INITIATIVES
PEOPLE:MAJOR
THEME FOR 1988
EMPLOYEE
I
N V 0 L V E
M E
N T
EMPLOYEE
DEVELOPMENT
,1988. EMPLOYEE
= INVOLVEMENT/DEVELOPMENT INITIAT!VES
o
MANAGEMENT/SUPERVISORY TRAINING
o
DEPARTMENT PERFORMANCE
ENHANCEMENT TEAM
o
TASK SPECIFIC
PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT TEAMS
o
ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS
REVIEWS
. MANAGEMENT/SUPERVISORY TRAINING. PROGRAM
0
LEADERSHIP SKILL TRAINING
0
ALL DEPARTMENT SUPERVISION
(SR. V.P,
TO FOREMEN)
0
SENIOR
MANAGEMENT PILOT PROGRAM
0
SENIOR
MANAGEMENT CLASS
LEADS
17
GROUPS
0
275
DEPARTMENT SUPERVISORS
0 i INSTRUCTORS
MERE EXPERTS
IN THEIR FIELD
0
CURRICULUM
DEPARTMENT MISSION AND VALUES
COMMUNICATION
COACHING
INTERPERSONNEL SKILLS
TEAM WORK & EMPLOYEE INVOLVEMENT
~
PLANNING
~
PEOPLE;
MAJOR THPlE FOR 1988
o
. TMO EXAMPLES OF EMPLOYEE INVOLVEMENT.
UNIT 2 2ND REFUEL TASK FORCE
MAINTENANCE .OER
o
1989 INITIATIVES
.::; UNIT'2:.-2ND .REFUEL. TASK; FORCE',
OBJECTIVE:
COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS OF ACTIVITIES THAT DID NOT
MEET MANAGEMENT EXPECTATIONS.
SCOPE:
FORTY TWO UN'IQUE ACTIVITIES
METHODOLOGY:
o
DEVELOP STATION ROOT CAUSE
PROCESS
AND APPLY TO
SCOPE,
o
EMPHASIS
ON GENERIC CAUSAL FACTORS.
TASK FORCE COMPOSITI.ON,,,
...-
I&C SUPERVISOR
LEADER
SR.
ENGINEER QC
SR.
ENGINEER OPERATIONS
ASST.
FOREMAN I&C
SR,
ENGINEER NSAG
UNIT SUPERVISOR
UNIT COORDINATOR
ASST.
FOREMAN MAINTENANCE
CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISOR
SR.
HEALTH PHYSICIST
SR.
COMPLIANCE ENGINEER
MAINTENANCE PLANNING & SCHEDULING SUPERVISOR
RESULTS
, ~
o
SAME WORK MANAGEMENT STRATEGY
OUTAGE VS NON-OUTAGE
o
ACCOUNTABILITY
WORK GROUP/FUNCTION
INDIVIDUAL
o
COMMUNICATION OF
MANAGEMENT EXPECTATIONS TO THE
INDIVIDUALWORKER
o
ADOPTrON OF
ROOT
CAUSE METHODOLOGY AS STANDARD
.o
RESPONSIVENESS
TO ENGINEERING ISSUES
~
~
~ '
~
PLANNIN6
e
PEOPLE:
MAJOR THPIE FOR 1988
o
TWO EXAMPLES OF
EMPLOYEE INVOLVEMENT
UNIT 2 2ND REFUEL TASK FORCE
MAINTENANCE OER
o
1989 INITIATIVES
BACKGROUND
I
I
~
- MAINTENANCE OPERATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS
REVIEW
0
OVER THE YEARS,
MAINTENANCE AT SUSQUEHANNA HAS BEEN
PERFORMED
BY THREE SEPARATE ORGANIZATIONS,
PLANT STAFF
CONSTRUCTION
GPA
CONTRACTOR (CATALYTIC)
0
QUALITY OF MAINTENANCE WORK BY ALL GROUPS
IS EXCELLENT,
MATERIAL CONDITION OF
PLANT
OPERATING
RECORD
OF UNITS
0
INDIVIDUALORGANIZATIONS EACH HAVE A UNIQUE CULTURE,
PROVIDING THEM WITH DIFFERENT SETS
OF POSITIVE
ATTRIBUTES,
ORGANIZATIONS ARE INDIVIDUALLYEFFECTIVE
=0
FUNCTIONAL EFFICIENCY OF THREE ORGANIZATIONS WAS AN
OBVIOUS OPPORTUNITY FOR STUDY AND ENHANCEMENT.
- =... MAINTENANCE OPERATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS
REVIEM,
OBJECTIVE:
IDENTIFY OPPORTUNITIES
FOR
IMPROVING EFFICIENCIES
IN OUR MAINTENANCE FUNCTION.
SCOPE
MAJOR SITE GROUPS
PERFORMING PHYSICAL MAINTENANCE,
METHODOLOGY:
EXTENSIVE AND COMPREHENSIVE CUSTOMER/WORKER
INTERVIEWS.
THOROUGH REVIEW OF FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS REPORTS.
IDENTIFY ORGANIZATIONAL EFFICIENCY IMPROVEMENTS.
'COMPOSITION -OF. TEAN ...
h
IRC SUPERVISOR
RESIDENT ENGINEERING SUPERVISOR
PRA SUPERVISOR
MAINTENANCE SERVICES
SUPERVISOR
ASST.
FOREMAN MECH MAINTENANCE
SUPV.-FIELD COST
AND SCHEDULE
CONSTRUCTION PRODUCTION SUPERVISOR
CONSTRUCTION
FOREMAN
CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISOR
RESOURCES
& TRAINING
SUPERVISOR
OF MAINTENANCE -,SUNBURY
CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISOR
0
SINGLE MAINTENANCE MANAGER
0
ORGANIZE BY FUNCTION
0
RETAIN OUTAGE ORGANIZATIONAL STRATEGY FOR
NON-OUTAGE
0
RECOGNIZE LIMITATIONS ON
CHANGE IMPOSED BY A
TWO REFUEL OUTAGE YEAR
0
PHASED
IMPLEMENTATION OVER FIVE YEARS
ORGANIZATIONAL
PROCESS
SUPPORT
0
PHASE I
COMPLETED JANUARY 15,
1989
0
COMPLETION OF OER
AND RESULTANT CHANGES ARE THE
FIRST STEP
OF
A MULTI-YEAR EFFORT
TO DEVELOP
A
MAINTENANCE FUNCTION THAT IS
A LEADER IN OUR
INDUSTRY.
~
PLANNING
o
PEOPLE:
MAJOR THEME FOR 1988
~
TWO EXAMPLES OF
EMPLOYEE INVOLVEMENT
UNIT 2 2ND REFUEL TASK FORCE
MAINTENANCE OER'
1989 INITIATIVES
1989
INITIATIVES
~, ~
'
'0
" REINFORCE ACCOUNTABILITY':"
ESTABLISHED OUTAGE TEAM FOR CONSECUTIVE OUTAGES
IMPLEMENTED PHASE I
OF MAINTENANCE OER
0
PROMULGATION OF
MANAGEMENT EXPECTATIONS
MROTE/REVISED STATION POLICIES
IDENTIFIED INDIVIDUALEXPECTATIONS
EXTENSIVE DISSEMINATION AND TRAINING
EXAMPLES
PROCEDURE
ADHERENCE
DEFENSE
IN DEPTH
CONTAMINATION CONTROL
'
STATUS
CONTROL
0
ADJUST EXISTING MORK PROCESSES
STATUS
CONTROL
MAINTENANCE PLANNING
PANEL ACCESSIBILITY
0
ENHANCE THE CORRECTIVE ACTION AND,ENGINEERING RESOLUTION
PROCESS
ROOT CAUSE METHODOLOGY
ROOT CAUSE TRAINING
IMPLEMENTED ECO
OUTAGE MANAGEMENT ATTRIBUTES
J
0
o
OUTAGES
PLANNED INDEPTH AND MELL EXECUTED
o
DYNAMIC OUTAGE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
o
STRONG
MANAGEMENT TEAM
o
FUNDAMENTAL VALUE:
LEARN FROM OUR EXPERIENCES
o
MATERIAL CONDITION IS EXCELLENT
o
iINVOLVEMENT OF ENTIRE ORGANIZATION
E
o
COMPREHENSIVE
INDEPENDENT PRE-OUTAGE ASSESSMENTS
1989.OUTAGE 'REVIEM
.
o.
HOM ME PREPARE
FOR
OUTAGES
o
IMPROVEMENTS FOR 1989
OUTAGES
o
DESCRIPTION
OF l989 OUTAGES
OUTAGE PLANMNG MILESTONES
1987
1988'989
U1-4TH
D
J'
~
H
U1-3RD
U2-2ND
V2-3RD
~
<
~
.. REFUELING OUTAGE SCHEDULE DEVELOPHENT
MAJOR
GU IDELINES
1
1)
TECHNICAL SPEC IF ICATION REQUIREMENTS
A.
B.
CORE COOLING
C,
CORE CIRCULATION
D,
E.
SECONDARY CONTAINRENT
F.
2)
MODIF ICATIONS
A.
SYSTEM IMPACT/ACCESS
B,
WORK PACKAGE DEVELOPMENT
C,
DURATION
D.
RETEST
REQUIREMENTS
3)
ESTABLISHED THRU VESSEL CRITICAL PATH ACTIVITIES
A.
SHUTDOWN
B,
CAVITY FLOOD I NG
C.
CORE
& INVESSEL WORK
D.
VESSEL
RESTORATION
0)
WATER RELATED PROBLEMS
A.
VESSEL CLARITY
B,
WATER MANAGEMENT
C.
FUEL POOL
COOl ING
5)
-- DIVISIONAL WORK
A.
.. B'., CS
C','
ELECTRICAL"SYSTEtrtS
6)
SURVEILLANCE SPECIFIC
A.
LLRT'S
B.
NAJOR
INTEGRATED TESTS
C,
LOGIC FUNCTIONALS
D.
DG TESTING
7)
MAINTENANCE WORK DOCUNENTS
A.
WA'S
B,
PN'S
C.
BULK SURVEILLANCES
8)
PERNI TS
A.
SYSTEM PERNITS
B.
INDIVIDUALPERNITS
9)
OVERALL SCHEDULE EVALUATION
A.
CRITICAL PATH
B.
BULKS
C.
NANPOWER
":;; '.:.'::.'..
"HP* PLANNING
o.
DEDICATED HP
SCHEDULER/PLANNER
o
CONTROL POINT
o
ALARA CONCERNS
ARE FACTOR
INTO OUTAGE SCHEDULE
o
STAGING OF SHIELDING
o
INCREASED DECON ACTIVITIES
I~~
if~< ~
~.Q
~
z
~cl
glib~ >j<>
IBRHtlNE Ietc41UR LfsTIIS
l.
OUTA6E XODENT PLANNING CUR!E
2,
PRE-OUTA6E XCLI%¹ PLANNIN6 CURVE
3,
PRE-OUTA6E MANHOUR BUf50FF CURVE
PERSt3NNEL
ACCESS
PROCESSING
PLANNING ClNE
5,
WA MATERIAL PROCUREMENT TREND CURVE
6.
NE MA%RIAL PROCURPE¹
TREND CURE
7,
OUTAGE PINING ACTIVITYPROGRESS
PLOTS (P/2)
8,
OUTA6E PLANNING MILESTONE INDICATORS
9.
OUTAGE RESOURCE PLAN OVERVIEW PLOT
10,
INDIVIDUALWORK GROUP
RESOURCE PLOTS
11,
DOCù PLANNING STATISTICS (VARIOUS TABULAR REPORTS)
UNIT 1 FOURTH REFUELING L INSPECTION OUTAGE
WORK DOCUMENT TREND FORECASTS
4000
$ 74 0.
$ 400.
$ 440
$ 000
$rdo
i NOIE: TARGET PLACED AT 2850 DOCUMENTS
ENTERING OUTAGE BASED ON
FINAL DOCUMENT FORECAST
2850
I
UI-CURIO
S
6
G~.
~ .. ~...
'.
~
~
~
~
0
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
2.
3420
Co
I
IQ>
$ 4oo
2
$440.
$ 000.
O
1rdo
IQdl
X
14OO
K
1440
1000
r40.
400
$ 40
S
e
iO
l
ps
~t~ 0
/
7/
o/
l.l
0 jl-~
I
~
~ ~
S ~
S ~
~
S ~
S ~
Sf
S
~ ~ ~
~ F
Si
S
~
~ ~
S ~
~
~ S
~ ~
S ~
S
S
S ~
S ~
~ ~
~
~ ~
~ S
S ~
bEPTEMbEII
OOTObER
NOVEMbER
DEOEMbER
JANUARY
FEbllUARY
MAROH
1 ~ $ $
10$ ~
0
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~ ~
~ ~
~ 1
~
I
APRII.
MAY
'Legend
6 IDENTIFIED
=.'0 PLANNED
ssssssssssss
0 STAGED
.'
ACT IDENT
., Q ACT PLANNED
m ACT STAGED
STATUS: MAR 15, 1989
8 ~
IMPROVEMENTS FOR
UPCOMING OUTAGES
MISSION OF
OUTAGE HANAGEPIENT
o
SCHEDULE CONTROL
o
SCOPE
CONTROL
o
COMMUNICATION PLAN FOR
PREPARATION
AND CONDUCT
o
INTEGRATE LINE.NANAGEMENT PLANS 8 SCHEDULES
o
LEVELIZE RESOURCES
o
CONTINUOUSLY EVALUATE OUTAGE OBJECTIVES
o
KEEPS
ALL LEVELS OF NANAGENENT INFORNED
.THE KEY CONCEPT
OF THE NEW MAINTENANCE ORGANIZATION IS CLEAR
ACCOUNTABILITYOF THE LINE ORGANIZATION FOR
OUTAGE AND NON-OUTAGE
WORK.
THIS IS ACCOUNTABILITYFOR SAFETY.
PRODUCTION.
SCHEDULE
AND COST.
WE HAVE COMMITTED'THE PLANT STAFF
MANAGEMENT RESOURCES
TO
IMPLEMENT THIS CONCEPT.
~ ~
r ~
'I
1
FUNCTIONAL TEAPI ORGANIZATION
p
~
o
LINE NANAGENENT ACCOUNTABILITY
o
INTEGRATION OF VARIOUS WORK GROUPS
UNDER SINGLE LINE NNAGER
o
SCHEDULING
o.
ENGINEERING SUPPORT
o
ALARA SPECIALIST ASSIGNED
E
UNIT 1
FOURTH REFUEL 4
INSPECTION OUTAGE
RESOURCE
PLAN OVERVIEH
CURRENT
RESOURCE
PLAN
TARGET
OELTA
TURBINE/GENERATOR
VALVES
HEAT- EXCHANGER
CONOENSER
CIRC MATER
MAJOR EqUIPMENT
EXPENSE MINOR MOOS
RP V/CRO/818
'THER
19,000
20,900
17,240
60,790
3,430',900
10,160
4,760
7,040
15,300
59,010
16,300
20,900
14,500
61,500
6,300
5,500
11,400
8,700
11,500
13,800
59,600
2,700
0
2,740
(710)
(2,870)
(1.240)
(3,940)-
(4,460)
1,500
(590)
CAPITAL
SUBTOTAL 08Ã
223,530
22,580
230,0M
(6,470)
(27,420)
TOTAL
246,110
280,000
(33,890)
s jd/trb1495i
++ TOTAL ++
ALL DIAECT AESOUAcEs
ArTACHHENT I
USAGE
60000
x
54000
300000
O
270000
240000
O
~
~
42000
210000
36000
180000
150000
120000
90000
0
16
APA89
23
30
21
HAY89
0
WEEKLY
5084
45058
52119
46256
42998
27751
15054
10354
3100
780
CUHUTVE
5084
50142
102261
148517
191515
219265
234320
244674
247773
248554
a~TIVE ~uss
ae
ltSACK
~.ATlVE US@K
KQAfKC 09.00
~
A MfKE 99.M
l1ll) Cl II fC I'o~> icos ri nH
ACTUATION .PREVENTION PLAN
o
SPECIALTY SCHEDULES
TO PREVENT ESF
ACTUATIONS
(LOSS
818'AD MONITOR
o
COMMUNICATION PLAN WITH ALL SITE PERSONNEL
TO STRESS
THE
EXPECTATIONS OF
INCREASED AWARENESS
AND
TAKE TWO
TO STOP
AND THINK OF
WHAT WE ARE DOING.
CONNUNICATIONS PLAN
PLANT MANAGENENT MILL CONDUCT
A SERIES
OF NEETINGS
ONE MEEK PRIOR
TO
EACH OUTAGE THAT COVERS
STATION POLICY.
AND NANAGEMENT
EXPECTATIONS.
ALL STATION PERSONNEL WILL ATTEND.
THIS
CONUNICATION WILL COVER THE FOl LOWING TOPICS:
0
0
0
p
0
0
0
PERSONAL SAFETY
CONTANINATION CONTROL
NUCLEAR SAFETY
PROCEDURE
ADHERANCE
STATUS
CONTROL
VERIFICATION
PROBLEN IDENTIFICATION AND CORRECTIVE ACTION
ACTUATIONS
RADIOLOGICAL SHUTDOW PLAN
o
PREVENT AIRBORNE ACTIVITY IN TURBINE BUILDING AFTER BREAKING
VACUUM.
o
PREVENT AIRBORNE ACTIVITY ON 818'HEN
REMOVING THE VESSEL
HEAD.
o
OPERATION Of
RHR IN SHUTDOWN COOLING TO PREVENT HIGH RAD
LEVELS.
o
PREVENT AIRBORNE ACTIVITY WHEN HAIN TURBINE HOODS
ARE
REMOVED.
o
MINIMIZE REACTOR VESSEL CONDUCTIVITY SPIKE DURING SHUTDOWN.
....HP
IMPROVEMENTS'
INCREASED PERMANENT MANPOMER
FIRST LINE SUPERVISOR
HP SPECIALIST
TECHNICIANS
o
IMPROVED QUALITY OF
CONTRACT. TECHNICIANS
o
INCREASED USAGE OF
PERSONNEL
CONTAMINATION MONITORS
o
INCREASED USAGE OF
REAL TIME AIRBORNE RADIOACTIVITYMONITORS
o
LEVELIZED RESOURCES
INSIDE CONTAINMENT
UNIT i FQU'RTI-I REFUFLING Ai~D IJ'ASPECTIQJ'~ G<3 J~G:
MAN-REM GOALS BY TASIl'
~
>wl~
J
I
1
I
.I
I
I
1
1
vs
e
'Il
I
I
J
I
I
J
J
gng
22
1+
g,,0:i~
'j,ghJ W-
,,\\
"ig
. ',i~,,",P
.
Cr .'11++i<<
r p
=4qk-
A.g~~.
<<"-Fp
~ ~
S
i'h
~
h
hfhtf
<<g
~
~ J~
, ('(
1~
J,~>>"
.;v"
-j";,~
PPXO
)P
'
V'nh
tg
'.~L
SJ
~
+SJ4
a ~
La
[" 44La
~
~
I ~
!
t
I
~ I',M'i
~~ II
r
&Is "l
'~
~
I
1
r r
I
I
I
I
-n)
ct
1
r
I
i
I
I
I
~
I
..>qg
I
I tr
II 1
I:>>
l a. ~ II
~wI~aa
l~p
I
Q
I
L I,
1~ I.
@Jr
h
IV
(0
~
1
( u,raa
..a
~
hI'I'r'.
(
~
.~ EP
0
a'.
I \\tr I
~
I
- Qh',
Q t+
a ~
1
I,l.q J
a
f .)Xv-
~
I ~
I':I l. gC
L<NlT
1 FOLIRTI-I RE- LIFLII'l', AND INSPECTS ".'
" ":. E
MANREM
h
~
~
~
~
~
~
DESCRIPTION
OF
UPCONI NG OUTAGES
Ul-4R&IO
APRIL 1
JUNE 2,
1989
U2-3R&IO
SEPTENBER
9 NOVE%ER 10'989
NAJOR
SCOPE ACTIVITIES FOR THE OUTAGE INCLUDE:
1)
REACTOR VESSEL:
Ul ORRIO
U2 3RaIO
228
NEW FUEL BUNDLES
OFF-LOAD SCHEME
2Q CRD'S
15
LPRN STRINGS
200
NEM FUEL BUNDLES
OFF-LOAD SCHEME
20 CRD'S
20
LPRN STRINGS
2)
. BULK SURVEILLANCES:
APPROXIMATELY 350
SURVEILLANCES MILL BE PERFORMED
ON
BOTH UNIT'S INCLUDING AN INTEGRATED LEAK RATE TEST.
4 ~
/
l
'I
~
0
~
3)
INSERVICE INSPECTIONS:
o
APPROXIMATELY 500 (UNIT I)
AND 050
(UNIT 2)
EXAMINATIONS (INCLUDING VISUAL> SURFACE,
VOLUMETRIC, INSPECTION Of 15
CLASS 1,2i
AND 3
SYSTEMS),
4)
NAJOR PROJECTS/SPECIAL
.
~
~
e
~ \\
~
U1 4RRIO
'U2'RRIO
o
LOSS
OF OFFSITE
POWER
o
APPENDIX
R
NODS
o
HEAT EXCHANGER REPLACENENT
ROON COOLERS
PIPE TUNNEL COOLERS
RECIRC
tttG SET
LO COOLERS
o
125 VOLT BATTERY REPLACENENT
o
WATER EXPANSION JOINT C/0
o
T/G MAINTENANCE %DS
o
DRYMELL COOLING
o
GENERATOR SPAN PROTECTION
,
o
VALVE UPGRADE PROJECT
o
WATERHANNER CLOSEOUT
(HPCI
CUT & CAP PANEL L/0
8 CABLE DETERMS)
o
RECONBINER PLUG VALVE
X
X
X-C
X
X-C
X
X
X
~
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
,X
X
NOTE:
X-C DENOTES
CONTINGENCY WORK
.
'
5).
..NAJOR NAINTENANCEWORK'I
4RRIO
U2 3RRIO
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
VALVE INSPECTION,
REPAIR
CHANGEOUT
RCIC TURBINE SHAFT SEAL REWORK
HPCI TURBINE INSPECTION
INSTALL VENTS
AND DRAINS ON
HV151F015ASB
(CONTINGENCY)
INSPECT
AND CLEAN ONE
HEAT EXCHANGER
RENOVE AND REINSTALL 16 NSRV'S
FOR TESTING
AND NAINTENANCE
VERIFY SEIS
DATA BASE
TUBE SHEET COATINGS
. FEEDWATER PUNP
ALIGNMENT
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
~4
6)
BULK CWORK
P
"..."...: .:; -::...0 -;
.RELEASE.:AND 'CONPLETION OF:AN .ESTIMATED'3;420....:,
RELATED MORK DOCUNENTS
(END OF OUTAGE TOTAL).
0
IMPLEMENTATION OF
APPROVED
NOD IFICATIONS.
UNIT 1
CONTAINS 55
APPROVED
NODS,
OF MHICH 8
ARE
CLASSIFIED AS CONTINGENCY.
UNIT 2 CONTAINS 47
MODS,
OF MHICH 3 ARE CLASSIFIED AS CONTINGENCY.
UNIT 1
4RRIO
.
TlTLE:
CRITICAL PATHS
WEEK 1
WEEK 2
WEEK 3
WEEK 4
WEEK 5
WEEK 6
WEEK 7
WEEK 8
WEEK 9.
SHUTDOWN
CG
VESSEL DISASSEMBLE
STARTUP
CIOSE
C NT~NME
1DSEOUT R TEST
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'ORE OnmAO
VBSSEL REASSENSfX
I
LPRM CHANGEOUT
RIIR TESTING
I
I
I
I
7
RIIR DIV I MAINTdc MODS
I
I
I
I
RHR DIV II MAINTR MODS
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I~CRD fRICOON 'IXSTING
I
I
RIIR DIYII
RESIRATION
0
P
I
CORE REIDAD
1ST CRITICAL PATH
2ND CRITICAL PATH
RESOURCE
PLAN
'OTH OUTAGES
275,000
MHRS DIRECT-EXPENSE
50,000
NHRS DIRECT CAPITAL
MAJOR CHALLENGES
o
SCOPE
CONTROL
o
MSIV REPAIRS
. o
SNUBBER TESTING RESULTS
o
MEETING GOALS OF:
IjNIT I
I]NIT 2
MAN-REM
390
295
LOST, TIME ACC IDENTS
0
0
NO LOST TIME ACCIDENTS
0
0
PERSONAL CONTANINATION REPORTS
60
60
ACTUATIONS
OVERTIME
35X
SUNNARY
o.
WE HAVE PREPARED
SAFELY WITH ALARA
o
WE HAVE MADE IMPROVEMENTS
o
WE ARE READY
o
INDEPENDENT REVIEW
OUTAGE SAFETY
NUCLEAR SAFETY ASSESSMENT
GROUP
(NSAG)
PHILOSOPHIC OVERVIEW
SPECIFIC
EXAMPLES
PPRL
APPROACH IS DEFENSE
IN DEPTH
SAFETY IS BUILT INTO AN OUTAGE BY SCHEDULING KEY ACTIVITIES TO
NEET SAFETY REQUI RENENTS;
o
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
o
PPaL
POLICIES
SAFETY IS
A LINE FUNCTION,
o
OUTAGE PLANNING
o
OPERATIONS
NSAG PROVIDES
AN INDEPENDENT REVIEM AND OVERSIGHT.
o
OUTAGE PLAN
o
OUTAGE EXECUTION
SAFETY LIMITS
COND ITION 4
CONDITION 5
TEMPERATURE
PRESSURE
LEVEL
POWER
200
F
1325
ABOVE TOP
OF
ACTIVE FUEL
140
F
15 PSIG
ABOVE TOP
OF
ACTIVE FUEL
0.38
'
0.28
K
0,38
K
0.28
K
CONTAINMENT SECONDARY CONTAINMENT REQUIRED
WHEN POSSIBILITY
EXISTS OF RELEASE OF RADIOACTIVITYTO THE PUBLIC.
o
WHEN HANDLING IRRADIATED FUEL
o
WHEN CORE ALTERATIONS ARE IN PROGRESS
o
WHEN OPERATIONS WITH POTENTIAL FOR DRAINING THE REACTOR
VESSEL
ARE IN PROGRESS
(OPDRVs)
BASIC REQUIREMENTS
CORE
COOI ING
o
MEANS OF
REMOVING DECAY HEAT MUST ALWAYS EXIST,
o
MEANS OF CIRCULATING WATER IN THE REACTOR VESSEL
MUST
ALWAYS EXIST.
MAKEUP WATER
o
.
MEANS OF ADDING WATER MUST ALWAYS EXIST:
SYSTEM OR SYSTEMS
VOLUME IN CAVITY SPENT
FUEL POOL
COMPLEX
CONTROL OF REACTIVITY
o
o
SLC SYSTEM
o
SHORTING BARS IN SRMs,
ETC.
o
BUILDING MUST BE INTACT
o
MUST BE OPERATIONAL
FUNDAMENTAL PPRL POLICIES
I,
WORK WILL BE DONE BY DIVISIONS
2.
CORE COOLING:
o
REQUIRED SYSTEMS
PLUS
ONE
o
ABNORMAL METHODS TESTED PRIOR TO DISABLIt'lG THE PRIMARY
SYSTEM
CORE COVER:
o
REQUIRED
SYSTEMS
PLUS
ONE
o
OPDRVs STRICTLY CONTROLLED
o
GATES TO REACTOR CAVITY AND TO CASK STORAGE PIT IN PLACE
WHEN POSSIBLE
o
BLANK FLANGES
ON
OPEN
COMPONENTS
o
DOWNCOMER COVERS
REMOVED
REACTIVITY CONTROL
o
COMPtETE
CORE OFFLOAD NO SHUFFLE
o
RELOAD PLAN CHECKED STEP
BY STEP
FOR
o',
CORE VERIFICATION BEFORE
NEW FUEL IS
ADDED
o
COMPREHENSIVE REACTIVITY CONTROl
INSTRUCTION
5.
NO FUEL HANDLING WHEN MAIN STEAM LINES ARE PRESSURIZED
6,
CRITICAL FUNCTIONS
SHOWN
ON
A DETAILED OUTAGE SCHEDULE
o
CORE
COOLING
.o
o
7.
COMPREHENSIVE
INDEPENDENT REVIEW
Rx
SHU
COND
COND
DOMN
IV,
V
FUEl
HEAD
NSL
CAVITY
GAl i
OFF-
OFF
PLUGS
FLOODED
OUT
LOADED
SERVICE
GATES
MATER
GATES
FUEL
IN
OUT
OUT
LOAD
200
F
100
F
SDC 2
CONDENSER
+ I
=
SRV/CS/SPC
+ /
HPCI/RCIC/SPC
/7
I.
I
'CCS
NOT
REQ
1
CS/SRV/SPC
CONDENSER
FLOODING
BOILING
1
FLOODING
BOILING
1
A
FPC-OUT
+'PC-OPR
RHR OUT FPA
RHR OPR
FPA
BOILI%
ONLY TS
LINIT
IS
22'VER
SPENT
FUEL
DESIGN
'125
F
ADNIN
110
F
I
I
I
COND V
140
F
FPC-OUT
rl
FPC-OPR
~ l
RHR OPR-FPA
BOILING
FPC-OPR
fl
RHR OPR-FPA
+ ]
BOILING
SDC 2
0
FPC-OPR
+ I
RHR OUT-FPA
RHR OPR-FPA
REtCYABI.E khTER TIGHT GATES
~IT 2 ~NI CAVITY
lhIT 2 OeBT I SEIARATINfm
IjHIT 2 $I EHT Fm POGI.
Qgg $TGRAGE PIT
UHn l Sme FuEL Pm
lan
1 Recne Q.vITT
lhn i DImII / $EI AIIATIN
818'LEVATION
REFUEL ING FLOOR
SPENT FUEL POOLS CONNECTED VIA THE CASK'TORAGE PIT
FIGURE 5.
J
HEAT El<CHANGER
FUEL .POOL
COOLING
PUMP
F I 6 .
4 .
SPENT
FUEL POOL
A-5
~TA OFFICE "I'"D tEMPORARY BRIDGE FUEL POOL. TEMPS
AND 'RVICE SVATER TEMPERATURE
haaaa0>>
Nl
NOl MNGli.>
95
4Q
~ 4
S5
LJ
CL
75
ARNL
6Q
Legend
STA OFFICE POOI. TEMP
BRIDGE TEMPORARY T C PGQL
25
24
25
26
27
MARCH
28
29
50
3)
1
KEEP
CORE
COVERED
'i%>
l CR
~
~
(
I
I
I
I
l
1
j
i
I
(
(
l
~
(
(
(
(
r
(
(
(
I
I
(
(
~
I
(
~
I
l
(
l
(
~
I
~,
(
~
I
4
4
)
Ql
I
4
4
I
I
~
4
~
I
)
I
~
I
i j,
~
4
I
I
I
i
)
I
I
4
)
t
4
4
4I
I
I
4
(
"
i
I
I
I
i
4
I
~
~
i
I
~
I
t
KEY ELENENTS
1.
IDENTIFY AND CONTROL DRAINAGE PATHS
2.
PRESERVE
RHR INTERLOCKS
CONTROL THE GATES
DOMNCONER COVERS
RENOVED
PROCEDURE AD-QA-326 OPERATIONS MITH POTENTIAL FOR DRAINING THE
REACTOR VESSEL/CAVITY.
SHUTDOWN ISSUES
1,
OFFGAS
SYSTEMS.
2.
LEAKING FUEL
o
GAS
(XENON)
o
CRUD
o
3.
AUXILIARYBOILERS
BOTH IN SERVICE.
RADIATION EFFECTS
OF
PROTRACTED OPERATION.
5.
RETENTION OF
RWCU IN SERVICE.
6.
WATER CLARITY/RADIATIONON 818.
7.
NECHANICAl
VACUUM PUMP.
8.
IF COOLING IS LOST
SECONDARY CONTAINMENT MUST BE
ESTABLISHED,
9.
PURGE
OF
REACTOR VESSEL - HEAD DRYHELL HEAD CONES OFF.
10.
RADIATION EFFECTS
OF FUEL ELEMENT FAILURES.
SUNNARY
1.
PP8L
APPROACH IS DEFENSE
IN DEPTH.
2.
SAFETY IS BUILT INTO AN OUTAGE BY SCHEDULING KEY ACTIVITIES
TO NEET THE SAFETY REQUIRENENTS.
POLICIES
HAVE EVOLVED TO ENHANCE SAFETY.
'SATISFYING THE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS IS NOT ENOUGH TO
ENSURE
OUTAGE SAFETY.
5.
SAFETY IS
A LINE FUNCTION.
6.
NSAG FUNCTION IS TO OBSERVE
AND REFLECT.
OUTAGE READINESS
A RADIOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE
ANNUAL
ASSESSMENTS
OUTAGE PERFORMANCE
REVIEWS
PROJECT
AND
DESIGN
REVIEWS
OUTAGE READINESS
REVIEWS
ANNUAL EXPOSURE
ESTIMATES/GOALS
EARLY VIEWS AND REVIEWS
o
PROJECT
REVIEWS
PRELIMINARY EVALUATIONS
F I NA'L EVALUATIONS
o
DESIGN
REVIEWS
ZONE Z WORK
EXPECTED
CUMULATIVE DOSE
> 10 MAN-REM
ON
REQUEST
YEAR IN PREVIEW
ANNUAL EXPOSURE ESTIMATE AND GOAL
o
REVIEW OF
PLANNED WORK
o
REVIEW OF
JOB
HISTORY
BUILD ON PREVIOUS
ALARA INITIATIVES
o
DISCUSSIONS
WITH WORK GROUPS
o
DEVELOPMENT OF DRAFT ESTIMATE/GOAL
o
DISCUSSIONS
WITH WORK GROUPS
o
REVIEW WITH STATION ALARA COMMITTEE
o
,,
CONCURRENCE
OF STATION AND CORPORATE
MANAGEMENT
1989 NN-REM EXPOSURE ESTINKS AND GOALS
ROUTINE OPERATIONS
'PLANT OPERATIONS
ROUTINE NINTENANCE
DECONTNINATION
RADWASTE OPERATIONS
FORCED OUTAGES
NN-REN
ESTINTE
45
97
18
13
ALARA GOAL
40
88
10
16
13
TOTAL
185
167
NON-OUTAGE MODIFICATIONS
UNIT 1 OUTAGE ACTIVITIES
tmIT 2 OUTAGE ACTIVITIES
25
430
'30
23
390
295
TOTAL 1989 ESTINIE:
ALARA GOAL:
TLD GOAl:
970
NN-REN
'75
NN-REN
720
NN-REN
OUTAGE IN PREVIEM
o
DISCUSSIONS
ABOUT WORK PLANNING AND WORK'SCOPE
CHANGES
o
REVIEWS WITH STATION ALARA COMMITTEE
o
OUTAGE READINESS MEETING
o
POTENTIAL GOAL REVISION - MEEK 1
UNIT
1
FOURTH REFUELING
& INSPECTION
OUTAGE
MAN-REM GOAL
BY TASK
TASKS
MAN-REM GOAL
5
OF
GOAL
ISI ACTIVITIES
85
22
SNUBBER TESTING
54
14
VALVE REPACKS
8I
REWORKS
53
14
GENERA
ENTRY
5
WORK
50
13
DW SUPPORT
SERVICES
5
UNDERVESSEL
WORK
MODIFICATIONS
45
33
21
REFUEL
FLOOR ACTIVITIES
22
MISC MAINTENANCE
L IMITOR(UE TESTING
5
REPAIRS
WORK
10
LLRT'S
3
HEAT EXCHANGER INSPECTIONS
1.5
TURBINE WORK
0.5
TOTAL
390
UNIT
1
FOURTH
REFUELING
AND INSPECTION
OUTAGE
MAN-REM GOAL
BY
COST
AREA
COST
AREA
DEPARTMENT
MAN-REM
GOAL
PERCENT
OF
GOAL
430
451
452
460
461
462
463
464
465
467
468
471-480
551-555
VARIOUS
EQUALITY'SSURANCE/CONTROL
NUCLEAR SERVICES (ISI)
NUCLEAR TRAINING
INSTRUMENTATION 5
CONTROL
HEALTH PHYSICS
TECH
GROUP
MAINTENANCE
LABOR SUPPORT
(DECON)
OPERATIONS
'PLANT MANAGEMENT
OUTAGE
MANAGEMENT
INSTALLATION ENGINEERING
NPE
( INCL RESIDENT
ENG)
EKS
CONST
( INCL CATALYTIC)
OTHER
12
20
0.1
31
28.
0.1
0.1
260
8.6
.03
0.5
1.5
.03
.03
.25
.25
67
2.5
TOTAL
390
IN-PROGRESS
REVIEW
o
DAILY RWP
STATUS
REVIEW
o
DEVELOPMENT OF GRAPHICS-EXPOSURE
BY COST
AREA AND BY TASK
o
DISCUSSIONS
WITH STATION ALARA COMMITTEE
1989
MAN-REM GOAL BY COST AREA
~ DATA AS OF FEBRUARY 28,
1898.
ACIUAL
PERCENTAGE OF
MAN-REM
MAN-REM GOAL
430
451
452
459
460
471-479
551-555
VARIOUS
23. 000
NUCKZAR SERVICES
( ISI )
30. 000
NUCLEAR TRAINING
PERSONNEL
Ec ADMIN
INC
HEALTH PHYSICS
CHEMISTRY
TECH GROUP
0. 400
0.400
25.000
95. 000
6. 000
6.000
MAINTENANCE
60.000
DECONTAMINATION
OPHVZIONS
45.000
38.000.
RW HKCKSSING PERSONNEL
9.000
IEG
NPE (ALLEÃXU%)
NPE - RE
0.300
0.300
3.000
2.000
2.000
~
EErS CONSTRUCTION (ALL)
525.000
5.300
0. 531
0.575
0;000
0.066
1.443
6.323
0.851
0.141
6.340
3.263
2.843
0.295
0.000
0.005
0.220
0.315
0.309
7.628
0.000
2.31
1.92
0. 00
16. 50
5.77
'.66
14.18
2.35
10.57
7.25
7.48
3.28
0.00
1.67
7.33
15.75
15.45
1.45
0. 00
'OTALS
875.000
31.148
NOIE:
ALL DATA BASED ON SRD EXP'OSURE
CLICJUUOO WWfCN10 OCR
COP 1tCAW. IL0
OCR CO CCa ICOaaaCV CL CaOS
~
4',P
~'yand
~ ~edaC
~H
EXPOSURE
BREAKDOMH BY TASK - I 5 C
Job Descri tion
~Februar
Man-Rem
X of Total
Man-Rem
Year To DateI of
Total
Man-Rem
Man-Rem
Gen Entry/Inspection
0.054
IIlC Surveillances
0.380
(485 Rack,
Scram Disc Vol.,
Smoke Detectors)
10
75
0.164
ll
0.700
49
Misc. Valve Work
Other Misc. work
0.005
0.000
0.070
0
r ~
14
0.005
0.489
0.085
0.509
1.443
YEAR IN REVIEW
o
PARTICIPATION IN OUTAGE CRITIQUES
IDENTIFICATION OF
NEW INITIATIVES
PLANNING FOR,
TRACKING OF INITIATIVES
DEVELOPMENT OF
ISSUES
FOR STATION ALARA COMMITTEE
o
ANNUAL ALARA ASSESSMENT
PERSONNEL
EXPOSURE
TASK ANALYSIS
700
700
BOO
1988 COLLECTIVE MAN-REM EXPOSURE
638
600
600
0K
400
C
~~I 300
E
O
200
100
0
Legend
ALARAGOAL
ACTUAL
II
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
616
600
K
400
C
8
~~
300
e
E
O
200
100
0
J
F
M
A
M
J
UNIT 2-2RIO
J
A
S
0
. N
0
1200
1137
COLLECTIVE RADIATIONEXPOSURE
BWR AVERAGE
1200
1000
1003 .-
Legend
GG INDUSTRY
FEB SUSQUEHANNA
1000
800
L
CL
E
eoo
400
784
553
622
414
521
547
258
~~
800
L
G.
E
coo
KIC
tg
4O0
200
200
1983
1984
1985
Year
. 1986-
'I987
1988
0
12
COLLECTIVE RADIATIONEXPOSURE
THREE YEAR AVERAGE DISTRIBUTION FOR BWRs
785-6 88
12
I ~
10
8
C
7
0
lD
6
Z
4
Best
Quartile
356
Susquehanna
l
328
>l
7ll
Median
584
I
I
I
4
25 Units
10
8
~ 0t:
7
0
6
4 Z
0
0
0
0
0
0
200
400
BOO
800
1000
00"
1800
180
1200
14
0
2000
Man-Rem Per Unit
Inn
Sr'VERAGE
0.379
0.88
ALIKEEXPOSUIK PER NRIK( (%EN)
1987
IM)USIRY
AUERA6E
410
WORKERS WmI REPORlH) EXPOSSK:
68EATER RAN 10 %PI.
700
700
600
~<
00
Rl
2000-2600
p nItj
2600-2000
100-
0
Cumulative Exposure (mrem)
PORjLATIN EXPOSUIK TRENDS
LESS THAN 10 rem
10 TO 200 mm
NEATER TNN 2 ~
1788
1501
1518
IMPROVEMENT ITEMS
FOR UNIT 1
SECOND
AND UNIT 2 FIRST:
MOCK-UP TRAINING IN TEAMS
USE
OF DEDICATED EXPERIENCED
CREWS
IMPROVED UNDERVESSEL
DECON
RESOLVED EQUIPMENT PROBLEMS
CAROUSEL WINCH AND SHOOT
OUT
STEEL
CART
SCHEDULING CHANGES
COMPLETE TESTING PRIOR
TO REINSTALLATION
. OF
INTERFERENCES
COMMUNICATION UNDERVESSEL
CAMERA
R
IMPROVED HEADSETS
FOR UNIT 1 THIRD AND UNIT 2
SECOND:
CHANGES
IN THE UNCOUPLING SCHEDULE
REMOTE UNDERVESSEL TOOLING (ALSO CHANGED MOCK-UP AT TRAINING
CENTER)
REBUILD ROOM
UPGRADES
FIRST
OUTAGE
SECOND
THIRD
RENOVAL/REILACENENT
UNIT 1
UNIT 2
1.68
0.97
0.95
0.67
0.59
REBUILD
UNIT 1
UNIT 2
. 0.35
0.27
0.35
0.27
0.33
TOTAL
UNIT 1
UNIT 2
2.03
1.24
1.30
0.94
0,92
HEALTH PHYSICS
READINESS
o
PEOPLE
INCREASED
PERMANENT MANPOWER
LOW TURNOVER)
SEASONED STAFF
CONTRACTOR TECHNICIANS-SUFFICIENT NUMBERS
AND ONSITE
o
TRAINING
HIGH PRIORITY
IMPROVED CONTRACTOR TECHNICIAN TRAINING
TRAINING CENTER
CONTROL POINT
o
PROGRAMS
AND PROCEDURES
PLANNING FOR
PPRL
LEAD TECHS
AT CONTROI
POINTS
PROCEDURES
REVIEW COMPLETED
CONTROL POINT CONDUCT PROCEDURES
IN-PLANT OVERSIGHT EMPHASIS
ASSISTANT FOREMEN
SPECIALISTS
RESOURCE
SCHEDULING UPGRADE
RADIOLOGICAL PERFORMANCE
STANDARDS TRAINING-EACH SECTION
CONTAMINATION CONTROL
RADWASTE MINIMIZATION
HOT PARTICLE CONTROLS
REFUEL. FLOOR
o
FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT
PERSONNEL
AND TOOL CONTANINATION NONITORS
ALARMED UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS
POINTS
DAM PROCESSING
TRAILER
UNIT 2
ACCESS
STRUCTURE
IN CONSTRUCTION
DRYMELL AND OTHER AIR NONITORING
o
SHUTDOWN PLAN
FLUSHES
SHIELDING
INCLUDES GENERIC DRYMELL SHIELDING
PREJOB
REVIEMS-
IN PROGRESS
REVIEWS
'
SUMMARY
o
ACHIEVEMENTS IN PROJECTS
PLANNING
o
LESSONS
LEARNED FROM SITE EXPERIENCE
o
AVAILABILITYOF
INDUSTRY COMPARISONS
o
RELATIONSHIPS WITH WORK. GROUPS
o
.AWARENESS
OF
WORK PRACTICES
AND INITIATIVES