ML17156A029

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
2016 Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Initial Licensed Operator Examination ES-201-2
ML17156A029
Person / Time
Site: Monticello Xcel Energy icon.png
Issue date: 05/31/2017
From: David Reeser
NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
To:
Nuclear Management Co
Shared Package
ML15274A421 List:
References
Download: ML17156A029 (1)


Text

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Date of Examination: November 2016 Initials Item Task Description a b* c#

1.

w

a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401 N. x. ~ ~

R b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with I~*

I T Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401 N and whether all K/A categories are appropriately sampled . '$-

T E c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. 3- 1-P..,.("l.

N

d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate. ~ ~
2. a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major ~ ~

s transients.

I M b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and u mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule L

A without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at least one new or significantly modifieid scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the t:7- ~

T applicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.

0 R

c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.

l$. ~DQ

3. a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:

(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed w among the safety functions as Bpecified on the form A (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form L (3) no tasks are duplicated from thr~ applicants' audit test(s) ~ ~

K (4) the number of new or modified tar.ks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on T the form .

H R b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1 :

0 u

(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified 8- ~~

G (3) no more than e>ne task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations H

c. Determine if there are enough diffemnt outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days . rJ- ~
4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections. l1- re&

G E b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41 /43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate . 8- ~

N E

c. Ensure that K/A importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5. ~ ~

R A

d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections. /fiJ{_ ~

L e. Check the entire ex~m for balance 01' coverage. ,)L ~

f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO). R. ~~ ~
a. Author
b. Facility Reviewer(*)

David Reeser NJA

,/r~d~'at~~

rte

~~'"

c. NRC Chief Examiner(#) Randal Baker I c- t\ u .."bl- \-;LJ.J If lot [!k
d. NRC Supervisor Robert Orlikow:;ki I .di f /!JI"\.__ - , fiu~ f)I1 ['1s'

/ I 1jhh1A Note: # lndependeint NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.

  • Not applicable for NRG-prepared examination outlines.

\ r1.~ ov.\\:: A~ \-o ~ :r. Bo-"'A (\AS rJRC 'i2J¥1 v W'\ ~er