ML17156A029
| ML17156A029 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Monticello  |
| Issue date: | 05/31/2017 |
| From: | David Reeser NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB |
| To: | Nuclear Management Co |
| Shared Package | |
| ML15274A421 | List: |
| References | |
| Download: ML17156A029 (1) | |
Text
ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Date of Examination: November 2016 Initials Item Task Description a
b*
c#
- 1.
w
- a.
Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401 N.
- x. ~ ~
R
- b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with I
I~*
T Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401 N and whether all K/A categories are appropriately sampled.
T Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.
3-1-P..,.("l.
E
- c.
N
~ ~
- d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate.
- 2.
- a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of
~
normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major
~
s transients.
I M
- b.
Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and u
mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule
~
L without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at t:7-A least one new or significantly modifieid scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the T
applicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.
0 To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and l$.
~DQ R
- c.
quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.
- 3.
- a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:
(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed w
among the safety functions as Bpecified on the form A
(2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form
~
L (3) no tasks are duplicated from thr~ applicants' audit test(s)
~
K (4) the number of new or modified tar.ks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on T
the form.
H R
- b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1 :
8-0 (1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form
~~
u (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified G
(3) no more than e>ne task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations H
Determine if there are enough diffemnt outlines to test the projected number and mix of rJ-
~
- c.
applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.
- 4.
- a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the l1-re&
appropriate exam sections.
G 8-
~
E
- b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41 /43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.
N Ensure that K/A importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.
~ ~
E
- c.
R
- d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.
/fiJ{_
~
A
,)L
~
L
- e. Check the entire ex~m for balance 01' coverage.
- f.
Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).
R.
~~ ~
- a. Author David Reeser /r~d~'at~~
rte
~~'"
- b. Facility Reviewer(*)
NJA
- c. NRC Chief Examiner(#)
Randal Baker I c-t\\ u.. "bl-
\\-;LJ.J If lot [!k
- d. NRC Supervisor Robert Orlikow:;ki I.di f /!JI"\\.__ -
fiu~ 1['1s' f)I
/
I 1jhh1A Note:
- lndependeint NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.
- Not applicable for NRG-prepared examination outlines.
\\
r1.~ ov.\\\\::
A~ \\-o ~ :r. Bo-"'A (\\AS rJRC 'i2J¥1 v W'\\ ~er