ML17152A004

NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review: Fitzpatrick- Proposed Alternative to Utilize Code Case N-789-1, Alternative Requirements for Pad Reinforcement of Class 2 and 3 Moderate-Energy Carbon Steel Piping for Raw Water Service

ML17152A004
Person / Time
Site:	FitzPatrick
Issue date:	05/31/2017
From:	Booma Venkataraman Plant Licensing Branch 1
To:	Tom Loomis Exelon Corp
References
MF9692
Download: ML17152A004 (3)

Text

NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Venkataraman, Booma Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 4:51 PM To: Loomis, Thomas R:(GenCo-Nuc)

Cc: Danna, James

Subject:

ACCEPTANCE REVIEW: FitzPatrick- Proposed Alternative to Utilize Code Case N-789-1, "Alternative Requirements for Pad Reinforcement of Class 2 and 3 Moderate-Energy Carbon Steel Piping for Raw Water Service (CAC: MF9692)

Expires: Sunday, July 30, 2017 12:00 AM By letter dated May 4, 2017 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No. ML17124A303), Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Exelon, the licensee), in accordance with 10 CFR 50.55a(z)(2), submitted a proposed alternative request from the requirement for replacement or internal weld repair of wall thinning conditions resulting from degradation in Class 2 and 3 moderate energy carbon steel raw water piping systems in accordance with ASME Code,Section XI, IWA-4000 for James A.

FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant. The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of the above request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

The NRC staff has reviewed your submittal and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed alternative request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staffs detailed technical review by separate correspondence.

Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that the relief request will take approximately 100 hours4.167 days <br />0.595 weeks <br />0.137 months <br /> to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete the review of the licensing action in approximately 12 months, which is by May, 2018. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager.

These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities. Additional delay may occur if the submittal is provided to the NRC in advance or in parallel with industry program initiatives or pilot applications.

If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-2934.

Sincerely, Booma Booma Venkataraman, P.E.

Project Manager, NRR/DORL/LPL1 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Booma.Venkataraman@nrc.gov 1

301.415.2934 2

Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 3547 Mail Envelope Properties (Booma.Venkataraman@nrc.gov20170531165100)

Subject:

ACCEPTANCE REVIEW: FitzPatrick- Proposed Alternative to Utilize Code Case N-789-1, "Alternative Requirements for Pad Reinforcement of Class 2 and 3 Moderate-Energy Carbon Steel Piping for Raw Water Service (CAC: MF9692)

Sent Date: 5/31/2017 4:51:12 PM Received Date: 5/31/2017 4:51:00 PM From: Venkataraman, Booma Created By: Booma.Venkataraman@nrc.gov Recipients:

"Danna, James" <James.Danna@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "Loomis, Thomas R:(GenCo-Nuc)" <thomas.loomis@exeloncorp.com>

Tracking Status: None Post Office:

Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 3170 5/31/2017 4:51:00 PM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: 7/30/2017 Recipients Received: