ML17083C131

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Insp Repts 50-275/88-21 & 50-323/88-19 on 880717-0903.No Violations Noted.Unresolved Item Noted Re LER 1-88-024 Concerning Failure to Meet Tech Spec Limiting Condition for Operation for Inoperable Instrument Channels
ML17083C131
Person / Time
Site: Diablo Canyon  Pacific Gas & Electric icon.png
Issue date: 09/28/1988
From: Zimmerman R
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
To: Shiffer J
PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC CO.
Shared Package
ML17083C132 List:
References
NUDOCS 8810170230
Download: ML17083C131 (8)


See also: IR 05000275/1988021

Text

RSODSN%l@RRK DNAQ%TQZI (RZDS>

ACCESS lON

.NBR: 8810170230

DOC. DATE: 88/09/28

NOTARIZED:

NO

DOCKET

FACIL:50-275 Diablo, Canyon Nuclear

Power Plant, Unit 1, Pacific

Ga

05000275

50-323 Diablo Canyon Nuclear

Power Plant, Unit 2, Pacific

Ga

05000323

AUTH.NAME

AUTHOR AFFILIATION

IMMER~N,R.P.

Region

5, Ofc of the Director

REGIP.NAME

RECIPIENT AFFILIATION

SHIFFER,J.D,

Pacific Gas

s Electric Co.

SUBJECT:

Forwards

Insp Repts

50-275/88-21

& 50-323/88-19

on

880717-0903.No violations noted.

DISTRIBUTION CODE:

IE01D

COPIES

RECEIVED:LTR I

ENCL

t

SIZE: 3 +'~

TITLE: General

(50 Dkt)-Insp Rept/Notice of Violation Response

NOTES:

RECIPIENT

ID CODE/NAME

PD5

PD

I

RGN5

ERNAL: LPDR

INTERNAL: ACRS

DEDRO

NRR/DLPQ/PEB

11

NRR/DOEA DIR 11

NRR/DREP/RPB

10

NRR/PMAS/ILRB12

OE LIEBERMANEJ

REG FILE

02

FILE

Ol

COPIES

LTTR ENCL

1

1

2

2

1

1

1

1

1

2

2

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

2

2

1

1

RECIPIENT

ID CODE/NAME

ROOD,H

AEOD

NRR MORISSEAU,D

NRR/DLPQ/QAB 10

NRR/DREP/EPB

10

NRR/DRIS DIR 9A

NUDOCS-ABSTRACT

OGC/HDS2

RES/DSIR

DEPY

NRC

PDR

COPIES

LTTR. ENCL

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES

REQUIRED:

LTTR

25

ENCL

25

Docket Nos.

50-275

and 50-323

Pacific Gas

and Electric Company

77 Beale Street,

Room 1451

San Francisco,

California 94106

Attention:

Mr. J.

D. Shiffer, Vice President

Nuclear

Power Generation

Gentlemen:

Subject:

NRC Inspection of Diablo Canyon Units

1 and

2

This refers to the routine inspection

conducted

by Messrs.

P.

P. Narbut and

K. E.'ohnston

during the period of July 17 through September

3,

1988.

This

inspection

examined your activities

as authorized

by

NRC License

Nos.

DPR-80

and

DPR-82.

At the conclusion of the inspection,

discussions

of their

findings were held with Mr. J.

D. Townsend,

and other members of your staff.

Areas

examined during this inspection are described

in the enclosed

inspection

report.

Mithin these

areas,

the inspection consisted of selective

examinations

of procedures

and representative

records,

interviews with

personnel,

and observations

by the inspectors.

No violations of NRC

requirements

were identified within the scope of this inspection.

However, the inspection findings did identify several

problems that should

be

addressed.

First, the problems identified in I&C procedure

backlog indicate

that

some corrective actions

have not been timely, such that (1)

a preventable

containment ventilation isolation event occurred

and (2) there is skepticism

among

I&C personnel

as to PG&E's ability to deal with problems, particularly

the guality Hotline.

Although good individual performance

was demonstrated,

that is,

an

I&C technician

avoided

a potential reactor trip; there

appears

to

be

a continuing problem which should

be addressed.

Secon'dly,

Our:,review of Licensee

Event Report 1"88-024, "Failure to Meet

Technical Spicification Limiting Condition for Operation for an Inoperable

Reactor Protection

Instrument

Channel

Due to Personnel

Error," as documented

in Paragraph"S=.d.

of the enclosure,

found that the root cause

analysis

and

corrective actions identified were considered

to be unacceptable.

This topic

has

been discussed

between your staff and the senior resident

inspector

on

September

12,

1988.

As a result of this conversation

a commitment was,made

to

provide

a revision to the

LER to clarify the root cause

analysis

and provide

more specific corrective actions.

Additionally, this is an unresolved .item

and your evaluation

as to the technical significance

should

be included in

your revision to the

LER.

Therefore, this letter

acknowledges

your commitme t

fot

a revision and urges

a timely response.

l

I

8810170230

880928

PDR

ADOCK 0500027S

PNU

28

1988

Finally, there were two trips during this inspection period (Paragraphs

4.i

and 4.j of the report) which could have

been prevented, if there

had been

appropriate prioritization and resolution of problems.

We understand

that you

have initiated a study of the problems,

and

we look forward to your

conclusions

and findings in this area.

Therefore,

we request that you provide your evaluation of these

conditions

and

your planned corrective actions within 45 days of the date of this letter.

In accordance

with 10 CFR 2.790 (a),

a copy of this letter and the enclosure

will be placed in the

NRC Public Document

Room.

Should you have

any questions

concerning this inspection,

we would be pleased

to discuss

them with you.

Sincerely,

j

lp(.

~ Pc,,:n.l

LCD

R.

P.

Zimmerman,

Chief Reactor

Projects

Branch

Enclosures:

Inspection Report Nos.

50-275/88-21

and 50-323/88-19

cc w/enclosure:

S.

D. Skidmore,

PG8E

R.

F.

Locke,

PG8E

J.

D. Townsend,

PG8E (Diablo Canyon)

D.

A. Taggert,

PGBE (Diablo Canyon)

T.

L. Grebel,

PG&E (Diablo Canyon) State of California

Sandra Silver (Report Only)

bcc w/enclosure:

Project Inspector

Resident

Inspector

State of California

docket file ;-""

G.

Cook

B. Faulkenberry

J. Hartin

T. Foley,

NRR

bcc w/o enclosure:

J. Zollicoffer

M. Smith

REGION

V

-3-

REGION

V pV

V

KEJohnston

PPNarbut

MMendonca

AFChaffee

DFKigsch

9>/88

9/~@88

9~/88

9/

/88

9/rff88

EST

COPY j

R

EST

COPY j REQUEST

COPY j REQUEST

COPY ] REQUEST

ES /

NO

E

/

NO

YES /

NO

YES /

NO

YES /

NO

RZ

man

9/

/88

EST

COPY

7

YE

/

NO

TO

PDR

YES /

NO