ML17069A039

Seabrook'S License Amendment Email from Justin Poole

ML17069A039
Person / Time
Site:	Seabrook
Issue date:	02/07/2017
From:	Justin Poole Plant Licensing Branch 1
To:	Grinnell D - No Known Affiliation
Shared Package
ML17069A036	List: ML17069A039 ML17069A049 ML17069A064 ML17069A077
References
Download: ML17069A039 (2)

Text

March 10, 2017 ADAMS Accession No: ML17069A039 From: Poole, Justin To: Deborah Grinnell Cc: Bower, Fred; Koenick, Stephen

Subject:

RE: Re: Seabrook"s License Amendment Date: Tuesday, February 07, 2017 12:31:01 PM

Debbie, As requested, Im letting you know that today the Seabrook ASR license amendment was noticed in the Federal Register.

Justin C. Poole Project Manager NRR/DORL/LPL I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (301)415-2048 From: Poole, Justin Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2016 8:40 AM To: 'Deborah Grinnell' <grinnelldebbie2@gmail.com>

Cc: Broaddus, Doug <Doug.Broaddus@nrc.gov>; Bower, Fred <Fred.Bower@nrc.gov>

Subject:

RE: Re: Seabrook's License Amendment Hello Debbie, Which time frame are you referring to when you say what is the justification for selecting the time frames proposed?

Yes I will send you an email when if/when the amendment is published in the Federal Register. I say if because we are still doing our acceptance review of the document. The amendment would only get noticed in the Federal Register if we accept the document for review. For more information on the acceptance review, I have attached our publicly available office instruction on how the staff performs acceptance reviews for license amendments (and other licensing actions).

Justin C. Poole Project Manager NRR/DORL/LPLI-2 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (301)415-2048 From: Deborah Grinnell [1]

Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2016 5:35 PM To: Poole, Justin <Justin.Poole@nrc.gov>

Subject:

[External_Sender] Re: Seabrook's License Amendment Are will yousorry!

On Sep 7, 2016, at 5:16 PM, Deborah Grinnell <grinnelldebbie2@gmail.com>

wrote:

Hello Justin, We are reading the Seabrook License Amendment, we have a question. What is the justification for selecting the time frames proposed? We you contact me asap when the SLA is submitted into the Federal Reg on the day?

Thank you, Debbie