ML17059B955

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Insp Repts 50-220/98-04 & 50-410/98-04 on 980309-13. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Reviewed Licensee Activities in Functional Area of Plant Support
ML17059B955
Person / Time
Site: Nine Mile Point  
Issue date: 03/30/1998
From:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To:
Shared Package
ML17059B953 List:
References
50-220-98-04, 50-220-98-4, 50-410-98-04, 50-410-98-4, NUDOCS 9804070124
Download: ML17059B955 (22)


See also: IR 05000220/1998004

Text

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORYCOIVIMISSION

REGION I

Docket Nos:

License Nos:

50-220, 50-410

DPR-63, NPF-69

Report Nos:

50-220/98-04, 50-410/98-04

Licensee:

Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation

Facility:

Nine Mile Point, Units

1 and 2

Location:

Scriba, New York

Dates:

March 9-13, 1998

Inspectors:

R. Ragland, Radiation Specialist

J.

Furia, Sr. Radiation Specialist

Approved by:

John R. White, Chief

Radiation Safety Branch

Division of Reactor Safety

9S04070124

9S0330

PDR

ADQCK 05000220

8

PDR

EXECUTIVESUMIVIARY

Nine IVlile Point Units 1 and 2

50-220/98-04 8( 50-410/98-04

March 9-13, 1998

This NRC inspection report includes reviews of licensee activities in the functional area of

plant support.

The report covers a five-day period of inspection and review by Region-

based specialist inspectors.

PLANT SUPPORT

A generally effective program for the collection, processing

and return to the plant

of liquid wastes, and for the collection, processing, storage and transportation of

radwaste was established.

~

One violation of transportation regulations was identified involving the release of a

vehicle (flat-bed trailer) for unrestricted use, that exceeded the radiation limits

specified in 49 CFR 173.443.

Re ort Details

Nine IVlile Point Units 1 and 2

50-220/98-04 & 50410/98-04

March 9-13, 1998

SUMMARy'FACTIVITIES

Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Staff Activities

Ins ection Activities

The NRC region-based

inspectors conducted inspection activities during normal hours.

The

results of the inspection activities are contained in the applicable sections of this report.

U dated Final Safet

Anal sis'Re

ort Reviews

While performing the inspections discussed

in this report, the inspectors reviewed the

'applicable portions of the Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR) related to the

areas inspected.

The inspectors verified that the UFSAR wording was consistent with the

"'observed plant practices, procedures and/or parameters, with the exception of the

following: (1) Section 12 of the Unit 1 UFSAR contains outdated information on the liquid

and solid radwaste processing program and equipment; and, (2) Section 11 of the Unit 2

UFSAR contains outdated information on the liquid and solid radwaste processing program

and equipment.

As previously noted in NRC Inspection Report 50-220/97-07;50-410/97-

07, the licensee has identified these UFSAR deficiencies, and has a program in place to

revise the UFSAR.

I. PLANT SUPPORT

R'I

Radiological Protection and Chemistry (RP&C) Controls

R1.1

Trans ortation and Radioactive Waste Pro rams

a.

Ins ection Sco

e 86750

The inspectors reviewed the licensee's programs for the processing of liquid and

solid radioactive wastes (radwaste) and the transportation of radioactive materials,

including: the Process Control Programs (PCP), scaling factor data for compliance

with 10 CFR 61.55, shipping records, and system walkdowns in radwaste..

b.

Observations

and Findin s

NMP1

The Unit 1 processing program for radwaste is contained in the Unit 1 Radwaste

Process Control Program, Rev. 4, dated February 26, 1998. This document

accurately reflects current Unit 1 pro'cessing systems and equipment, and is an

significant improvement over Revision 2 of the PCP which was reviewed during

inspection 50-220/97-07.

Subsequent to the conclusion of that inspection, the

Unit 1 PCP was revised in December 1997 (Rev. 3). A subsequent

revision

(Revision 4) effected transfer of management oversight for the radwaste program

from the Operations Department to the Health Physics Group.

All personnel

previously a part of the Radwaste Operations Section were transferred to the Health

Physics Group.

The inspectors reviewed the licensee's

program for determining difficultto measure

radionuclides in its waste streams,

in accordance with 10 CFR 61.55. The licensee

submits, on an annual basis for pertinent waste streams, plant specific samples to a

vendor laboratory for total isotopic analysis.

The results of these analysis are then

reviewed and incorporated into a licensee maintained computer data base.

The

inspectors noted that the licensee currently has only one proceduralized method for

notifying the unit radwaste supervisor when plant conditions change that may affect

waste stream specific scaling factors of greater than an order of magnitude.

Such

change could potentially invalidate the scaling factors in use in accordance with the

NRC's Low-Level Waste Licensing Branch Technical Position (BTP) on Radioactive

Waste Classification (May 1983). The only licensee method that has the potential

of addressing

interim plant condition changes that affect scaling factors relies on

data collection on a quarterly basis.

Such method may not be completely effective

if radiological conditions changed rapidly.

Due to current plant practice of storing

most radioactive wastes onsite (especially spent resins) for at least one year, the

impact of this current methodology is minimal since the shipments would not likely

be made before the next annual reassessment

of scaling factors.

The inspectors

discussed this issue with both unit Radwaste Managers, who indicated that this

matter would be reviewed further with the unit Chemistry Managers to determine

appropriate corrective action.

The licensee's resolution of this matter willbe

examined in a future inspection. (IFI 50-220/98-04-01)

The inspectors conducted

a detailed system walkdown of the radwaste facilities.

The inspectors conducted direct visual observation in all but three of the radwaste

facilities'ubicles.

Three areas posted as airborne radioactivity areas were not

entered.

All areas reviewed, except as noted below, were determined to be

appropriately posted and generally well maintained from the perspective of

radiological housekeeping.

The exception to this were the areas around the two

waste collector pumps, ¹11 and ¹12, located on the 229'levation.

Both pumps

were observed to be actively leaking at their seals.

A review of records indicated

that a work order to correct this situation was issued, but also that this is the third

time since 1995 that these pumps have leaked at their seals.

Although the leakage

was currently being maintained within the

posted contaminated

area of the pump

base, the inspectors noted that back the late 1980's and early 1990's these pumps

had been observed spraying water from their seals, resulting in extensive

contamination.

At the exit meeting on March 13, 1998, the Unit 1 Plant Manager

indicated that the status of these pumps and their maintenance would be reviewed.

Although this issue indicates poor housekeeping

in this one cubicle, the facility, as

described in the UFSAR, was designed to contain leaks and spills of potentially

contaminated materials.

No violations of NRC requirements was identified.

0

The inspectors reviewed the records of three radioactive materials shipments,

including a shipment of spent resins to a radwaste processor made on March 11,

1998, which was observed by the inspectors.

The shipment records reviewed were

determined to meet the applicable provisions of 10 CFR Parts 20, 61 and 71, and

49 CFR Parts 170-178, for waste classification and form, shipping and radwaste

manifests and transportation communications.

On February 6, 1998, the licensee returned to service from'nit 1, an empty flatbed

trailer. The trailer had arrived onsite previously containing boxes of radioactively

contaminated equipment for use in the spent fuel pool. The empty trailer was sent

to the Babcock and Wilcox (B5W) facility in Parks Township, Pennsylvania.

The

licensee's documentation of the vehicle survey did not identify any contamination or

radiation levels on the trailer in excess of the regulatory limits. Therefore, the trailer

was released for unrestricted use without the need for any additional controls or

postings.

On February 9, 1998,

BtkW conducted

a receipt survey of the trailer and

discovered two accessible

areas on the trailer surface which had contact radiation

levels in excess of Department of Transportation (DOT) limits contained in 49 CFR

173.443, i.e., [0.005 mSv/hr {0.5 mrem/hr)]. The two areas were determined to

, be 0.014 mSv/hr (1,4 mrem/hr) and 0.300 mSv/hr (30 mrem/hr), respectively.

Upon notification by BRW, the licensee dispatched

a radiation protection technician

and supervisor to the BOW location and confirmed the presence of the two

locations with higher than allowable radiation levels.

The licensee temporarily

suspended

all further shipments of radioactive materials or release of vehicles for

unrestricted use.

It resumed these activities later in February 1998 upon

establishing a more comprehensive survey methodology with a group of specially

trained radiation protection technicians.

The return to service of an empty vehicle

that was previously used to ship radioactive materials as an exclusive use vehicle

with radiation levels in excess of DOT limits, is an violation of 10 CFR 71.5. Title

10 CFR 71.5 requires that NRC licensee's comply with all applicable DOT

requirements,

including 49 CFR 173.443. (VIO 50-220/98-04-02)

NMP2

The Unit 2 processing program for radwaste is contained in the Unit 2 Radwaste

Process Control Program, Rev. 3, dated December 18, 1997. This document

accurately reflects current Unit 2 processing systems and equipment, and is an

improvement over Revision 2 of the PCP which was reviewed during inspection

50-410/97-07.

This version of the PCP now accurately includes references to the

Thermex system which is utilized in the unit to process both waste collector and

floor drain inputs.

The inspectors conducted

a detailed system walkdown of the radwaste facilities,

The inspectors conducted direct visual observation in all but one of the radwaste

facilities'ubicles.

An area posted as airborne radioactivity area was not entered.

All areas reviewed, except as noted below, were determined to be appropriately

posted and generally well maintained from the perspective of radiological

housekeeping.

The exception to this were the pipe chase located below the

309'levation

of the radwaste facility, the spent resin tank cubicle and pump room and

the sludge agitator and waste tank cubicle, where resins were observed on the

floor. In the case of the spent resin tank pump and waste tank cubicles, discrete

piles of spent resin were observed.

In the spent resin tank cubicle, the entire floor

surface was covered in resin.

The inspectors discussed their findings on this matter

at the exit meeting on March 13, 1998. At this meeting the Unit 2 Plant Manager

indicated that this condition would be remediated.

The inspector noted that though

this issue indicates poor housekeeping

in this one cubicle, the facility, as described

in the UFSAR, was designed to contain leaks and spills of potentially contaminated

materials.

No violation of NRC regulatory requirements was identified.

The inspectors reviewed the records of four radioactive materials shipments,

all of

which were determined to meet the applicable provisions of 10 CFR Parts 20, 61

and 71, and 49 CFR Parts 170-178, for waste classification and form, shipping and

radwaste manifests and transportation communications.

c.

Conclusions

The licensee has established

a generally effective program for the collection,

processing

and treatment of liquid wastes and the collection, treatment, storage and

shipment of radwaste and radioactive materials.

However, housekeeping

concerns

were identified in both unit's radwaste facilities. Further, one apparent violation of

DOT requirements was identified at Unit 1.

R8

Miscellaneous Plant Support Issues (86750,92904)

R8.1

0 en Violation 1013

EA 97-530: Shi ment of Radioactive Material with

Radiation Levels in Excess of DOT Limits

By letter dated February 23, 1998, Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation submitted

its Reply to Notice of Violation and Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty.

In this

letter, short-term corrective actions for this violation included Radiation Protection

Manager review of all radioactive material shipments, and long-term corrective

actions included providing radiation protection technicians with continuing training

on the event and revising radiation protection survey procedures.

The inspectors verified that the short-term corrective action is currently in place,

and discussed with both Training Department and Radiation Protection personnel

the status of the long-term corrective actions.

Training personnel indicated that

they were awaiting final corrective actions, including any revised procedures

development, before initiating continuing training. The Radiation Protection

Managers indicated that revised survey procedures would be issued by April 30,

1998, as committed to in the response

letter.

R8.2

Closed

IFI 50-220 97-0-08:Identification of Conditions in Waste Concentrator

Tank ¹11 and Tank Cubicle

By letter dated January 5, 1998, Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation submitted its

Response to Request for a Plan of Action Regarding ¹11 Concentrated Waste Tank.

In this letter, the results of two entries into the tank and pump cubicle were

documented, together with a general action plan for remediation.

As part of this

inspection,

a review of documentation, including a videotape of the entries was

made by the inspectors.

At the exit meeting on March 13, 1998, the Unit 1 Plant

Manager committed to complete the following actions by December 31, 1998

regarding the ¹11 Concentrated Waste Tank, Tank Cubicle and Pump Cubicle:

(1) remove all encrusted concentrates

from the floors and piping in the cubicle;

(2) remove all loose debris, such as hoses, wires and paper trash from the cubicle;

and, (3) remove pieces of asbestos

insulation which have fallen onto the cubicle

floors. The licensee did not commit to removing any of the residual concentrates

from the inside of the ¹11 Waste Concentrates

Tank or to conduct a total asbestos

abatement of the cubicle at this time. Such final decontamination willbe included

in a site decommissioning plan.

R8.3

Closed

Violation 1034

EA 97-530: Im ro er Transfer of Licensed Material

By letter dated February 23, 1998, Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation submitted

its Reply to Notice of Violation and Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty.

In this

letter, short-term corrective actions for this violation included amending licensee

procedures to require that all transport of radioactive materials from the site be

handled by the appropriate radwaste section, and not by warehouse personnel.

These procedural changes

have been completed.

R8.4

0 en Violation 1033

EA 97-530: Shi ment of Incorrect Liner of Radwaste to a

Processor

By letter dated February 23, 1998, Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation submitted

its Reply to Notice of Violation and Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty.

In this

letter, short-term corrective actions for this violation included personnel disciplinary

action, meetings with the responsible managers overseeing radioactive waste

shipments and an inventory verification of the liner storage facility. The inspectors

verified that all of the short-term corrective actions have been completed.

The

inspectors noted, however, that no long-term corrective actions were proposed,

such as amending its procedure GAP-RPM-01, Interim Storage of Low-Level

Radioactive Waste, or any other procedure, to include a periodic inventory of the

liner storage area, in order to preclude recurrence.

Discussions with the unit

Radwaste Supervisors indicated that such a procedural change will be evaluated.

R8.5

Closed

EEI 50-220 97-07-13and 50-410 97-07-13:Failure to Verif the QA

Pro ram of Radwaste Processin

Vendors

By letter dated January 22, 1998, the NRC issued

a Notice of Violation and

Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty (EA 97-530) to the Niagara Mohawk Power

Corporation.

Included in this letter was a discussion which left this item as

unresolved while awaiting final review by the NRC. Subsequent

review by the

NRC's Office of Nuclear Material Safety 5 Safeguards,

Division of Waste

Management,

has determined that such an audit is not required under NRC

regulations'.

Although incorporated as a requirement under the Unit 1

PCP'revision

2), the requirement was not clear as to its application to off-site waste

processing,

and has subsequently

been removed from the current revision of the

PCP.

R8,6

Closed

UNR 50-220 98-01-12: Potentiall

Contaminated Truck Released from

Unit 1

As discussed

in Section R1 of this report, this item is a cited violation. The

unresolved item is therefor administratively closed.

V. IVlana ement Meetln s

X1

Exit Meeting Summary

The exit meeting occurred on March 13,1998.

During this meeting, the

inspectors'indings

were presented.

NMPC did not dispute any of the inspectors'indings

or

conclusions.

Based on the NRC Region

I review of this report, and discussions with NMPC

representatives,

it was determined that this report does not contain safeguards

or

proprietary information.

PARTIALLIST OF PERSONS CONTACTED

Nia ara Mohawk Power Cor oration

R. Abbott

D. Barcomb

D. Bosnic

J. Burton

J, Conway

R. Dean

S. Doty

K. Dahlberg

G. Gresock

M. Gridley

J. Helker

T. Hogan

C. Merritt

B. Murtha

L. Pisano

N. Rademacher

R. Randall

K. Rowe

V. Schuman

R. Smith

A. Taylor

J. Torbitt

M. Wallace

K. Ward

D. Wolniak

Vice President, Nuclear Engineering

Manager, Unit 2 Radiation Protection

Manager, Unit 2 Operations

Manager, Quality Assurance

Vice President, Nuclear Generation

Manager, Unit 2 Engineering

Manager, Unit 1 Maintenance

Plant Manager, Unit 2 (Acting)

Licensing

HRD

WC/OMG Manager, Unit 2

Radiation Protection Supervisor, Unit 1

Chemistry Manager, Unit 2

Operations, Unit 1

Manager, Unit 2 Maintenance

Executive Staff

Mana'ger, Unit 1 Engineering

ALARASupervisor, Unit 2

Manager, Unit 1 Radiation Protection

Plant Manager, Unit 1

Radwaste Supervisor, Unit 2

Radwaste Supervisor, Unit 1

Radiation Protection, Unit 1

Technical Support Manager, Unit 2

Manager, Licensing

INSPECTION PROCEDURES USED

IP 86750

Solid Radwaste Management 5 Transportation of Radioactive Material

IP 92904

Follow Up - Plant Support

ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND UPDATED.

~Oened

50-220/98-04-01

50-220/98-04-02

IFI

Followup on scaling factor determination relative to changing

plant conditions

VIO

Empty vehicle transport with radiation levels in excess of DOT

limits [49 CFR 173.443(c)]

Closed

50-220/97-07-08

IFI

Identification of conditions in waste concentrates tank ¹11

EA 97-530¹1034

VIO

Improper transfer of licensedmaterial

50-220 8L

EEI

50-410/97-07-1 3

Failure to verify the QA program of radwaste processing

vendors

50-220/98-01-12

UNR

Potentially Contaminated Truck Released from Unit 1

~Udeted

EA 97-530, ¹1013

VIO

Shipment of radioactive material with radiation levels in excess

of DOT limits

EA 97-530¹1033

VIO

Shipmentof incorrect liner of radwasteto

a processor

T

LIST OF ACRONYMS USED

CFR

EEI

IFI

mrem/hr

mSv/hr

NMP1

NMP2

QA

PCP

Radwaste

UFSAR

Code of Federal Regulations

Escalated Enforcement Item

Inspector Follow-up Item

mllirem per hour

millisieverts per hour

Nine Mile Point Unit 1

Nine Mile Point Unit 2

Quality Assurance

Process Control Program

Radioactive Waste

Updated Final Safety Analysis Report

V.