ML17059B402

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Insp Repts 50-220/96-13 & 50-410/96-13 on 961020-1130 & Notice of Violation
ML17059B402
Person / Time
Site: Nine Mile Point  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 01/16/1997
From: Cooper R
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To: Sylvia B
NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORP.
Shared Package
ML17059B403 List:
References
EA-96-474, EA-96-541, GL-88-01, GL-88-1, NUDOCS 9701240133
Download: ML17059B402 (8)


See also: IR 05000220/1996013

Text

January

16,

1997

EA No.96-474

EA No.96-541

Mr. B. Ralph Sylvia

Executive Vice President Generation

Business

Group and Chief Nuclear Officer

Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation

Nuclear Learning Center

450 Lake Road

Oswego, New York 13126

SUBJECT:

NRC INSPECTION REPORT NOS. 50-220/96-13 AND 50-410/96-13

AND NOTICE OF VIOLATION

Dear Mr. Sylvia:

This report transmits the findings of safety inspections conducted

by NRC inspectors at the

Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Units

1 and 2, from October 20 through November 30,

1996. At the conclusion of the inspection, the findings were discussed

with Messrs.

R.

Abbott, Vice President and General Manager - Nuclear; M. M'Cormick, Vice President-

Nuclear Engineering;

C, Terry, Vice President - Nuclear Safety Assessment

and Support;

and other members of your staff.

Based on the results of this inspection, the NRC has determined that a violation of NRC

requirements

occurred.

The violation is cited in the enclosed

Notice of Violation (Notice),

and the circumstances

surrounding the violation are described

in the enclosed report.

Specifically, the violation involved several examples of welds at both units that were not

inspected at the frequency required by Generic Letter 88-01 and the NMPC inservice

inspection program.

You are required to respond to this letter and should follow the instructions specified in the

enclosed

Notice when preparing your response.

The NRC will use your response,

in part,

to determine whether further enforcement action is necessary to ensure compliance with

regulatory requirements.

In addition, apparent violations were identified and are being considered for escalated

enforcement action in accordance

with the "General Statement of Policy and Procedure for

NRC Enforcement Actions" (Enforcement Policy), NUREG-1600.

The apparent violations

were identified based on our review of two events.

The first was the Unit 1 reactor vessel

overfill event on November 5, 1996, where it appears that weaknesses

with your

corrective action program and its implementation contributed to the event,

Specifically, we

noted that (1) a leaking feedwater flow control valve contributed to the high reactor vessel

water level and that you were aware of leaking flow control valves in July 1996, but did

not investigate the extent of the problem, (2) your staff identified in 1992 that the wide

range level instrument read lower than expected during power operation, but the condition

970i240i33 970iih

PDR

ADQCK 05000220

8

PDR

OFFICIAL RECORD

COPY

IE: Ol

I

c>,

Mr. B. Ralph Sylvia

was not dispositioned

in a timely manner and the operations staff, which relied upon the

instrument during the event, was not aware of the discrepancy,

and (3) the Unit 1 scram

procedure

did not provide sufficient direction to the operators to prevent a reactor overfill,

despite the fact that an appropriate procedure was developed for Unit 2 following an

overfill event in January 1988.

We also note that poor communications within your

organization appear to have contributed to the operators

being unaware of the discrepancy

with the reactor vessel level instrument.

Furthermore, we noted that your

organizations'esponse

to and evaluation of the event were weak in that it was only after the resident

inspectors questioned

the validity of the wide range level instrument reading and requested

a computation for density compensation

of the reading that you determined that water had

entered the main steam lines.

The second event was your discovery of foreign material in the Unit 2 suppression

pool

and downcomers during the 1996 refueling outage.

We'concluded that the Unit 2

suppression

pool was not adequately

cleaned during the refueling outage

in Spring 1995.

It appears weaknesses

in your corrective action pr'ogram also contributed to this event,

Specifically, we noted that your staff documented

that the debris removed in the 1995

refueling outage entered the suppression

pool via the downcomers,

but failed to inspect

the downcomers.

Also, it appears that your procedure for inspecting the drywell to ensure

no loose material existed was not properly implemented

in that you failed to identify caps

on seven downcomers that were apparently left in place since initial startup.

Accordingly, no Notice of Violation is presently being issued for these inspection findings.

In addition, please

be advised that the number and characterization of apparent violations

described

in the enclosed inspection report may change

as a result of further NRC review.

A predecisional

enforcement conference will be arranged to discuss the apparent

violations.

The decision to hold a predecisional enforcement conference

does not mean

that the NRC has determined that a violation has occurred or that enforcement action will

be taken.

This conference

is being held to obtain information to enable the NRC to make

an enforcement decision, such as a common understanding

of the facts, root causes,

missed opportunities to identify the apparent violation sooner, corrective actions,

significance of the issues and the need for lasting and effective corrective action.

In

addition, this is an opportunity for you to point out any errors in our inspection report and

for you to provide any information concerning your perspectives

on 1) the severity of the

violations, 2) the application of the factors that the NRC considers when it determines the

amount of a civil penalty that may be assessed

in accordance

with Section VI.B.2 of the

Enforcement Policy, and 3) any other application of the Enforcement Policy to this case,

including the exercise of discretion in accordance

with Section Vll.

You will be advised by separate

correspondence

of the results of our deliberations on this

matter.

No response

regarding the apparent violations is required at this time.

s

Mr. B. Ralph Sylvia

3

In accordance

with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice,"

a copy'of this letter

and its enclosures,

and your response

will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.

Sincerely,

Original Signed

by:

Richard W. Cooper, Director

Division of Reactor Projects

Docket Nos.

License Nos.

50-220, 50-410

DPR-63, NPF-69

Enclosures:

1.

Notice of Violation

2.

NRC Inspection Report Nos. 50-220/96-13 and 50-410/96-13

cc w/enclosures:

R. Abbott, Vice President & General Manager -.Nuclear

C. Terry, Vice President- Safety Assessment

and Support

M. McCormick, Vice President - Nuclear Engineering

N. Rademacher,

Unit 1 Plant Manager

J. Conway, Unit 2 Plant Manager

D. Wolniak, Manager, Licensing

J. Warden, New York Consumer Protection Branch

G. Wilson, Senior Attorney

M. Wetterhahn, Winston and Strawn

J. Rettberg, New York State Electric and Gas Corporation

Director, Electric Division, Department of Public Service, State of New York

C. Donaldson,

Esquire, Assistant Attorney General, New York Department of Law

J. Vinquist, MATS, Inc.

P. Eddy, Power Division, Department of Public Service, State of New York

F. Valentino, President,

New York State Energy Research

and Development Authority

J. Spath, Program Director, New York State Energy Research

and Development Authority

c

f

0

Mr. B. Ralph Sylvia

Distribution w/encls:

D. Screnci, PAO (1)

Region

I Docket Room (with concurrences)

Nuclear Safety Information Center (NSIC)

PUBLIC

NRC Resident Inspector

R. Zimmerman, ADPR, NRR

J. Goldberg, OGC

J. Lieberman, OE (2)

D. Holody, Rl

R. Correia, NRR

R. Frahm, Jr., NRR

L. Cunningham,

NRR

D. Barss, NRR

R. Gallo, NRR (Section E8.5)

L. Doerflein, DRP

T. Moslak, DRP

R. Junod,

DRP

Distribution w/encls:

(VIAE-MAIL)

W. Dean OEDO

B. Norris - Nine Mile Point

S. Bajwa, NRR

D. Hood, NRR

K. Cotton', NRR

M. Campion, Rl

Inspection Program Branch (IPAS)

DOCUMENT NAME: G:iBRANCH1iNMIR9613.BSN

To cecalve e copy of this docwnent, Indicate In the box:

C

~ Copy wlthotn ettschment/endoswe

E

~ Copy with ett

ent/endosure

N

~ No copy

OFFICE

RI/DRP

RI/DRP

RI/DRP

NAME

BNorris

LDoerflein

RCooper

DATE

1/I" /97

1A /97

1/ /97

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY