ML17059A899

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Grants Util Request for Documents Concerning Updated Final Version of Design Submittal for Repairing Plant Core Shroud to Be Withheld from Public Disclosure Per 10CFR2.790
ML17059A899
Person / Time
Site: Nine Mile Point Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 08/14/1995
From: Edison G
NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned)
To: Sylvia B
NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORP.
References
TAC-M91273, NUDOCS 9508170092
Download: ML17059A899 (8)


Text

>g8 REGI7

.4 a

oc p,0 07 a

0O IV) g O

+G

~O

++**+

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 August 14, 1995 Mr. B. Ralph Sylvia Executive Vice President, Nuclear Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station P.O.

Box 63

Lycoming, NY 13093

SUBJECT:

REQUEST FOR WITHHOLDING INFORMATION FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE, NINE MILE POINT NUCLEAR STATION UNIT NO.

1 (NHP-1)

(TAC NO. H91273)

Dear Mr. Sylvia:

By letter dated January 23,

1995, Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation (NHPC) submitted for NRC review and approval, an updated final version of NHPC's January 6,
1995, design submittal for repairing the NHP-1 core shroud.

The January 23, 1995, submittal included:

(1) the final version of General Electric Company (GE) Report GENE-B13-01739-04, "NHP1 Shroud Repair Hardware Stress Analysis," Revision 0, December 1994; (2)

GE Report GENE-B13-01739-05, "Safety Evaluation, GE Core Shroud Repair Design," Revision 1, January 1995; and (3)

GE Drawing No.

107E5679, "Modification and Installation Drawings,"

Revision 2, December 1994.

The JanIIary 23, 1995, submittal requested that the above documents be withheld from public disclosure pursuant to 10 CFR 2.790.

A nonproprietary version of the January 23, 1995, submittal was submitted by NHPC's January 26, 1995, letter.

Revised GE affidavits were submitted in a letter dated March 24, 1995.

Three affidavits (one for each of the above noted documents),

each dated March 13,

1995, by George B. Stramback of GE, stated that the submitted information should be considered exempt from mandatory public disclosure for the following reasons:

'a ~

Information that discloses a process,

method, or apparatus, including supporting data and analyses, where prevention of its use by General Electric's competitors without license from General Electric constitutes a competitive economic advantage over other companies; b.

Information which, if used by a competitor, would reduce his expenditure of resources or improve his competitive position in the design,

~

manufacture, shipment, installation, assurance of quality, or licensing of a similar product; c.

Information which discloses patentable subject matter for which it may be desirable to obtain patent protection.

9508170098.850814 H PDR ADQCK 05000220

.:.P.;,

PDR '",

B. Sylvia

~ ~

We have reviewed your application and the material in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 2;790 and, on the basis of GE's statements, have determined that the submitted information sought to be withheld contains trade secrets or proprietary commercial information.

Therefore, the versions of the submitted information marked as proprietary will be withheld from the public disclosure pursuant to 10 CFR 2.790(b)(5) and Section 103(b) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended.

Withholding from public inspection shall not affect the right, if any, of persons properly and directly concerned to inspect the documents.

If the need

arises, we may send copies of this information to our consultants working in this area.

We will, of course, ensure that the consultants have signed the appropriate agreements for handling proprietary information.

If the basis for withholding this information from public inspection should change in the future such that the information could then be made available for public inspection, you should promptly notify the NRC.

You also should understand that the NRC may have cause to review this determination in the future, for example, if the scope of a Freedom of Information Act request includes your information.

In all review situations, if the NRC makes a

determination adverse to the above, you will be notified in advance of any public disclosure.

Docket No. 50-220 cc:

See next page Gordon E. Edison, Senior Project Manager Project Directorate I-1 Division of Reactor Projects - I/II Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

B. Ralph, Sylvia Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation 7

cc:

Nine Hile Point Nuclear Station Unit No.

1 Hark J. Wetterhahn, Esquire Winston 5 Strawn 1400 L Street, NW Washington, DC 20005-3502 Supervisor Town of Scriba Route 8, Box 382

Oswego, NY 13126 Mr. Louis F. Storz Vice President Nuclear Generation Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation Nine Hile Point Nuclear Station P.O.

Box 63

Lycoming, NY 13093 Resident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P.O.

Box 126

Lycoming, NY 13093 Gary D. Wilson, Esquire Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation 300 Erie Boulevard West
Syracuse, NY 13202 Regional Administrator, Region I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406 Hr. F. William Valentino, President New York State
Energy, Research, and Development Authority 2 Rockefeller Plaza
Albany, NY 12223-1253 Mr. Richard B. Abbott Unit 1 Plant Hanager Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station P.O.

Box 63

Lycoming, NY 13093 Hs. Denise J. Wolniak Manager Licensing Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station P.O.

Box 63

Lycoming, NY 13093 Charles Donaldson, Esquire Assistant Attorney General New York Department of Law 120 Broadway New York, NY 10271 Hr. Paul D.

Eddy State of New York Department of Public Service Power Division, System Operations 3 Empire State Plaza

Albany, NY 12223 Hr. Hartin J. HcCormick, Jr.

Vice President Nuclear Safety Assessment and Support Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station P.O.

Box 63

Lycoming, NY 13093

l 3

J 0

B. Sylvia

' pt s

It r

t We have reviewed your-application and the material in accordance with the requirements of'0 CFR 2.790 and, on 'the basis of GE's statements, have determined that the submitted information sought to be withheld contains trade secrets or proprietary commerc'ial,information.

Therefore, the versions of the submitted information marke'd as proprietary will be withheld from the public disclosure pursuant to 10 CFR 2.790(b)(5) and Section 103(b) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954,.as amended.

1 Withholding from public inspection shall not affect the right, if any, of persons properly and directly concerned to inspect the documents.

If the need

arises, we may send copies of this information to our consultants working in this area.

We will, of.co'urse, ensure that the consultants have signed the appropriate agreements for handling proprietary information.

If the basis for withholding this information from public inspection should change in the future such that the information could then be made available for public inspection, you should promptly notify the NRC.

You also should understand that the NRC may have cause to review this determination in the future, for example, if the scope of a Freedom of Information Act request includes your information.

In all review situations, if the NRC makes a

determination adverse to the above, you will be notified in advance of any public disclosure.

Sincerely, Original signed by:

Docket No. 50-220 cc:

See next page

~ob Gordon E. Edison, Senior Project Manager Project Directorate I-1 Division of Reactor Projects - I/II Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket File PUBLIC PDI-1 Reading SVarga JZwolinski LHarsh SLittle GEdison H. P. Siemien, OGC CCowgill, RGN-I DOCUMENT NAME:

G: (NHPI ltN191273. PRO To receive e copy of this document, indicate ln the box:

a Copy without enclosures E

a Copy with enclosures "N a No copy OFFICE NAME DATE LA:PDI-1 SLittle 08/Io/95 PH:PDI-GEdison:

mm 08/

/95 OGC HPSi emi en 08/ '95 D: PDI-1 LMarsh 08/ 6/95 08/

/95

, OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

I l'l 5

Pj j

g I 4

1" H,

<I C

I' ij t'<