ML17056A967
| ML17056A967 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Nine Mile Point  |
| Issue date: | 04/03/1990 |
| From: | Bernard Thomas NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORP. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17056A964 | List: |
| References | |
| PROC-900403, NUDOCS 9009110049 | |
| Download: ML17056A967 (10) | |
Text
TECHIIICHLHEVJEV HIIQCQQTHDL QCZHVaLQQ No. ~~rrr r '"'~ r Ro~ N.o~'prd Rhep, NC CI TliLE ULA os tJ ku Descry tioe of 0 f cheaecarelreeeoaoCgeaecalchengee)
C'cwspsrt-n r V
~F3~ Sent PllgoE'r /Og p ADDED PLUMER: 54/NC 4 77FF "hl u
ops zm o
Ate-7aoi~ccbp b4 '~~
MODIFICA IO'f Vt'C Mn r
\\
DATE
.4 e fF PERfCOfC REVfEWWITHNO CHAN6ES tprd Rev, NC). USE THE LhST PUm.fSHED REVfSfCH NMdKRAND CCNTiNUE REVfKWPR~..
I rorleeer DEPT. NAblR TITLE SlGNATURE CROSS DISCIPLIEkRYREFIT@ Or noc reqccired. uee linea for f'neciricacion ecacemend DEPT. NAME TGLE 1
TQRE DATE n
pp r.
Cc I q)sr~4
~f 'rr
> z/~p
"'" ")~
IF NOT lN CCNCURRKNCE. 00 NOT SfGN dUT REKRN OCUHENT TO THE AUTH'lTHCl&MNTS Roach to goeLlcy Accordance fmranee: Ym @No CL ifNo.
Dace h, cmnmenca are accacfcod.
Rooted co A~JLA.foe'ee.
Yoe g. No Q. lfNo, r hs.~hh.
sepraseorscrrs ~
sra ~4 "p
rr cossaears ers errsches. U.
mnrr~mnIS maamZu:
NOg VZS a (SZEXTr>CHZD) mvrm oF mz sma~ ncmzamxr zhs azar caMe~rm ~ mpRo YhL IS RECOMMEKIED. (Approrers shall slsacfp sppfoers ch tha pracosors corer sheer);. 0 marcher Smu hm Sme (MEEnZS 5 0Z/). mrmVZO. ZZSyf. ZO a Cg O~KRHKIP SEPT SUPV FIG 2.0-SH 1
OF 4 9009fi0049 900830 PDR ADQCK 05000220 R
PNU AP-2.0
-29 Decenber 1989
0
~(k~ '
I %R
~a ~t ~an+
>el%% "f I
M.:Y A(~
A~~ su
TECHNICAL REVIEW AND COAAROL EVALUATION OF NEED FOR SAFETY ANALYSIS Qf'ACCORDANCE WITH 10 CFR 50.59 (Documents that require General Supt. approval per Tech Spec 6.8)
FOR DOOONENE NO. (.~~~
I+
REO.
+
DATE~V The Author (A) and four SORC Members (Minimum 2
regular
- members, 2
alternates) are to respond to each of the questions below.
NO YES*
Does the document/revi.sion result in a change to the facility A
or procedures described in the FSART 1
2 3
4 pf a
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Does the document/revision deviate from compliance to Tech
- Specs, or is the margin of safety defined in the basis reduced'P A
Rf 0
1 0
0 2
0 0
3 a
a a
o Does the document/revision increase the probability of
- occurrence,
'or the consequences of an accident, or malfunction of equipment important to safety (Class
- 1) evaluated in the FSAR increasedV A
1 2
3 4
0 0
a a
0 0
0 a
Does the document/revision create the possibility for an A
accident or malfunction of a different type than any evaluated 1
in the FSAR'P 2
3 4
- A "MAYBE" constitutes a "YES" response.
f a
.Recommend Nuclear Engineering or Tech Services perform a safety, ANALYSIS to present to SORC,(noted by a "YES" response to any of the above questions).
Recommend full SORC committee review this Evaluation of need for Safety Analysis.
123,,4 0
0 0
0 1
2 3
4 0
a 0
o Recommend approval This 'document does not involve an unreviewed safety questi.on.
1 2
.3
/ // // // /
1 2
3 4
SORC Member Signatures Date Figure 2.0-2 2 OF 4 AP-2.0
-30 December 1989 SORC meeting number (if required)
-0
]as
aw 4
~l
+,Aa~)
'\\
~)
H~
gA 1 ~
i@a
'o 4i>
~
\\b W41 gll ~
TELHIIILALREVIEWAIIDCGIIYRGL REFERENCE DOCUMENTS The items entered below have been included in the preparation and/or review of the attached reference document and are presented in place of a specific check sheet for the document..
The followingpersons vere consul'bout this procedure AME TI gob a
oak hVo Cf;T" rpf Procedure is in compliance vith the followingTechnical Specif ications
~CTION~MENDMENT Y
Z-f,./
'/Are f 4 7/
~Pl 3
(p
~
+
- v ~ 7
(/V
'P9'-/6 e>> '/4 )
3im ToE~, xn pu( Tg&. spcolal~sr Compliance <<ith: CFR / VS-NRC o e e
'" "'i 'REGULATORY GUlDES(s)
"DATED '- BY Compliance with ANSl STANDARD(s)
DATED BY 0
Compliance with: ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code(s) 0 D
ADD DUM BY is consistent vith the followingStation or Site procedures:
NU B
R BY 35c u.6-E f OTHER 1NFORMATION SOURCES CONSULTED 4
4
~
e 4
BY UTHOR ~ oooe
~ ~ eoo oooo coo<oooo oo oo A
REVIEWED BY oooo'oe oooo ooe
~
~
~
~
4 O
~oeooeoq ATEeooe4oo ooooo oyo oooooooooo
~
~
eDATEeeofefoeX ooooAoooooeoo e
~ o e e
~ m e
Y
~ ~
~ ~
FIG 2.0-2 SH 3 OF 4
-31 December 1989
0 1
C'T
<it q% t 5llQ+p <<Q
~ J-af
$ 1 i'
~
\\ 'Jgh,f+4 C \\'L q 4
\\
ew
+L
AW i'p
~ I t
II d
I 4
I
~
- I' I+
H
General Superintendent Nuclear Generation K. A. Dahlberg J.
L. Hillis fg~VN lg v
7190 1,2,5,6,8,9,11,17,41-44,48, 49,53,54,56-58,90,91,94-96 3,4,7,10,20,23,27 50,51 19,21,22,24-26 i,ii,iii,12-16,18,28-40,45-47, 52,55,59-89,92,93,97-129 February 1987 December 1987 January 1988 February 1990 June 1990 THIS PROCEDURE NOT TO BE USED AFTER June 1992 SUBJECT TO PERIODIC REVIEH.
4h