ML17054B359
| ML17054B359 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Nine Mile Point  |
| Issue date: | 01/10/1985 |
| From: | Vassallo D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Hooten B NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORP. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17054B360 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8502010710 | |
| Download: ML17054B359 (4) | |
Text
January 10 1985 Docket No. 50-220 Mr. B.
G. Hooten Executive Director, Nuclear Operations Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation 300 Erie Boulevard West
- Syracuse, New York 13202
Dear Mr. Hooten:
DISTRIBUTION L~)
Local PDR DEisenhut SNorris ELJordan JPartlow Gray File NRC PDR ORB¹2 Rdg OELD RHermann PMcKee ACRS (10)
The enclosed Safety Evaluation addresses the environmental qualification of electric equipment important to safety for Nine Mile Point, Unit No.
1 for compliance with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.49.
It also addresses the resolution for the deficiencies identified in the SE dated December 30, 1982 and August 6, 1982 Franklin Research Center (FRC) Technical Evaluation Report (TER) enclosed with it, and justification for continued operation.
On March 15,
- 1984, a meeting was held with Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation (NMPC) to discuss your proposed method of resolution for each of the environmental qualification deficiencies identified.
Discussions also included your general methodology for compliance with 10 CFR 50.49, "Environmental gualification of Electric Equipment Important to Safety for Nuclear Power Plants,"
which became effective February 22,
- 1983, and justification for continued operation (JCO) for those equipment items for which environmental qualification is not yet completed.
By letter dated May 31, 1984, you provided a submittal, addressing the above subjects and documenting. the discussions held at the meeting.
Based on discussions during the meeting and the results of our review of your May '31,'984 submittal, we have concluded that NMPC's Equipment gualification Program is in compliance with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.49, that the proposed resolution for each of the environmental qualification deficiencies identified for Nine Mile Point, Unit No.
1 is acceptable and that continued operation of Nine Mile Point, Unit No.
1 will got present undue risk to the public health and safety.
'incerely,
Enclosure:
Safety Evaluation cc w/enclosure:
See next page DL:ORB¹2 DL:
2 SNo~is:aas RHerrÃann 01/ 7/85 01f7 /85
/s/
D. B.Vassallo Domenic B. Vassallo, Chief Operating Reactors Branch ¹2 Division of Licensing D
RB¹2 DVassallo 01/f/85 8502010710 850110 PDR
- DDCK 05000220 PDR
I 1I q (
v
~ l
(
'I Pl i
1 I t we
'\\
l I "~>',ll I
I LI
~ (
'4 r
ll I
tJ
~
s
Mr. B. G. Hooten Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit No.
1 CC:
Troy B. Conner, Jr., Esquire Conner 5 Wetterhahn Suite 1050 1747 Pennsylvania
- Avenue, N.
W.
Washington, D.
C.
20006 Frank R. Church, Supervisor Town of Scriba R.
D.
k'2
- Oswego, New York 13126 Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation ATi'N:
Mr. Thomas Perkins Plant Superintendent Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station Post Office Box 32
- Lycoming, New York 13093 Resident Inspector U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Post Office Box 126
- Lycoming, New York 13093 John W. Keib, Esquire Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation 300 Erie Boulevard West
- Syracuse, New York 13202 Thomas A. Murley Regional Administrator Region I Office U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406 Mr. Jay Dunkleberger Division of Policy Analysis and Planning New York State Energy Office Agency Building 2 Empire State'laza
- Albany, New York 12223