ML17054B321
ML17054B321 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Nine Mile Point |
Issue date: | 12/31/1984 |
From: | NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORP. |
To: | |
Shared Package | |
ML17054B319 | List: |
References | |
NUDOCS 8501080425 | |
Download: ML17054B321 (784) | |
Text
NINE MILE POINT NUCLEAR STATION UNIT 2 Cl CIQ ClClClClC3 Cl 850i03 850i080425 050004i0 PDR *DOCK
. PDR A
I I
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 EQD TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title ~acae INTRODUCTION 2 ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS 2-1 2.1 TEMPERATURE, PRESSURE, AND RELATIVE 2-1 HUMIDITY 2.2 RADIATION ENVIRONMENT 2-2 2.3 CHEMICAL ENVIRONMENT 2-3 2.4 SPRAY/SUBMERGENCE 2-4 3 FUNCTIONAL PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS 3-1 3.1 SYSTEM LIST 3-1 3.2 SYSTEM/ACCIDENT, MATRIX 3-1 3.3 POST-ACCIDENT OPERABILITY TIME 3-1 QUALIFICATION METHODOLOGY 4-1 4.1 HARSH ENVIRONMENT 4-1 4.1.1 BOP Equipment Electrical 4-1
- 4. 1.2 NSSS Equipment
- 4. 1.3 Equipment-Mechanical Electrical'OP/NSSS 4-6 4.2 MILD ENVIRONMENT 4-8 4.2.1 BOP Equipment Mild Environment 4-9 Qualification Program 4 '.2 NSSS, Mild'nvironment 4-10 Qualification Program I 5 QUALIFICATION DOCUMENTATION 5-1 5.1 MASTER LISTS (ML) 5-1 5.2 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK 5-2 (SCEW) SHEET MAINTENANCE/SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM 6-1 REFERENCES 7-1 APPENDIXES SAFETY-RELATED ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT MASTER LIST (ML)
SYSTEM COMPONENT EVAIUATION WORK (SCEW) SHEETS TEST AND ACCIDENT ENVIRONMENTAI PROFIIES D SAFETY-REIATED MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT April 1985
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 EQD LIST OF TABLES Table No. Title 2-1 Harsh Environment Zones 2-2 Mi;ld Environment Zones 2-3 DELETED DELETED 3-1 Systems Lis't 3-2 System/Accident Matrix 3-3 SWEC/GE System Cross Reference DELETED 1k 5-1, EQD Master List Format 5-lA Equipment Qualification Master List Environmental Qual'ification (BOP) 5-1B NMP-2 Environmental Qualification Data Master List (NSSS) 5-2 DELETED LIFT OF FIGURES Fi ure No. Title 5-1 DELETED April 1985
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 EQD SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION The purpose of this document is to establish the methods and summarize the results of the environmental qualification program for Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ~ The information supports Section F 11 of the Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) and is provided in accordance with 10CFR50.49 and the guidance of Appendix E, NUREG 0588, Interim Staff Position on Environmental Qualification of Safety-Related Electrical Equipment, December 1979.
For mechanical equipment, the information supports Section 3.11 of the FSAR and provides the additional information requested in NRC Question 270.3(f).
April 1985
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 EQD SECTION 2 ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS The Equipment Qualification Environmental Design Criteria (EQEDC)ocument summarizes the indoor environmental design conditions for normal, abnormal, and accident conditions.
The scope of the EQEDC is limited to establishing the environmental conditions of temperature, pressure, humidity, and radiation (beta, gamma, and neutron). Seismic and hydrodynamic loading conditions are not within the scope of the EQEDC.
These parameters are 'the environmental design limits to which safety-related equipment is designed and qualified.
These data have been incorporated into safety-related equipment design or'rocurement specifications to ensure that the proper functional performance of the system or equipment during design mode of operation is adequately demonstrated.
The environmental data for temperature, pressure, humidity, and radiation are defined in the EQEDC for each building zone that contains equipment which requires environmental qualification. Data are'isted for normal operating conditions, abnormal operating conditions, and the accident event that impacts the zone ambient environment.
The harsh environment zones are listed in Table 2-1. Mild environmental zones are listed in Table 2-2.
2.1 TEMPERATURE, PRESSURE, AND RELATIVE HUMIDITY The plant heating, ventilating, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems maintain indoor temperature and pressure conditions in QA Category I buildings for all normal operating modes.
Minimum, average, and maximum temperatures are defined and listed in the EQEDC. During normal operation relative humidity is not controlled but is limited to a specified maximum percentage in areas that are mechanically cooled.
Elsewhere, relative humidity is limited only by the effect of the indoor sensible heat load.
Normal conditions are assumed to exist on a continuous basis until an abnormal or accident condition occurs, with the 2-1 April 1985
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 EQD abnormal or accident condition then lasting for the duration listed in the EQEDC At the conclusion of the abnormal or
~
accident, condition duration it except radiation, will return to normal.
is assumed that conditions, Abnormal operating conditions are any reasonably expected or anticipated deviations from normal conditions (excluding accident conditions). Abnormal operating conditions include:
Transients that result from main steam line isolation (loss of condenser vacuum, turbine, trip, and MSIV closure (including a stuck open relief valve).
- 2. Transients caused by a single failure of one division of redundant essential HVAC equipment.
- 3. Transients caused by the loss of nonessential drywell HVAC equipment as the result of a loss of offsite power at a high containment pressure condition.
- 4. Plant operation during test conditions.
The abnormal temperature profiles applied to the primary containment for conditions 1 and 3 envelope all normally expected transient conditions.
An accident condition is an unexpected event, occurring during the course of operation, that has been postulated for analytical purposes and has the capability of causing a release of radioactivity to the environs that could endanger public safety if not. mitigated. A main steam line pipe rupture is an example of an accident condition..
2.2 RADIATION ENVIRONMENT Integrated radiation environments are specified in terms of rads for gamma and beta radiation. The gamma values are based on ,energy deposition in tissue (rads) or exposure in air (roentgen). However, the corresponding absorbed dose which would occur in equipment materials (e.g , carbon) when exposed to the environment would differ only slightly in magnitude. For equipment qualification testing, the equivalence of 1 rad to 1 roentgen is an appropriate assumption. The beta environment is stated in terms of a surface air dose and does not account for any shielding 2-2 April 1985
Nine. Mile Point Unit 2, EQD between the airborne or plateout activity and the material of interest. " The total integrated dose, equals the normal plus the accident conditions..', Neutron environments are specified in terms of neutron fluence (neutrons/cm~) for that portion of the spectrum-hl Mev.
For normal operating conditions, the radiological environments are specified as doses. integrated over a 40-yr plant life for gamma and beta radiation. A plant capacity factor of 0.8 is used to develop the integrated doses for all equipment which operates in conjunction with normal reactor operation. Expected operation'ime over the 40-yr life of the plant is used to determine integrated doses in the vicinity of other auxiliary systems and equipment, such as fuel handling systems.
Radiation dose contributions due to abnormal conditions that are expected during the life of the plant are included in the 40-yr normal operating conditions.
Radiation dose contributions due to abnormal conditions are for the MSIV isolation event resulting from a transient caused by a loss of condenser vacuum, an MSIV closure, or a turbine trip.
For accident conditions, accident radiological doses are in addition to normal and abnormal operational conditions. The accident dose contribution is determined for the single most limiting accident. Dose profiles as a function of time (t) following the accident are specified. The actual accident dose that equipment is evaluated against is determined based on the required operation time of the device following an accident. In most cases, the post-LOCA (DBA) environmental conditions will be the basis for the radiological requirements. Anticipated transients without a scram are also considered. Accident integrated doses include combined dose. contributions from airborne and contained sources and=
represent the maximum dose for the area specified.
2.3 CHEMICAL ENVIRONMENT Engineered Safety Feature (ESF) systems are designed to perform their safety functions in the temperature, pressure, and humidity conditions described in the EQEDC.
Unit 2 does not utilize any chemical additives to the water recirculated by the ECCS during normal or accident conditions.
2-3 April 1985
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 EQD Following an accident, the containment and drywell atmospheres are maintained below 5 percent (by volume) hydrogen, as discussed in FSAR Section 6.2.5.
Water for the reactor (normal operation), suppression pool,
~
fuel storage pool, RHR system, and ECCS is not chemically inhibited and is controlled by ion exchange systems within .
the'ollowing normal operating limits:
Refueling and Fueg Suppression Reactor Water Storage Pool Water Limits Shutdown Pool Water Quality Par'ameter Condition Maximum Limit Conductivity 610 mho/cm 53 umho/cm 510 umho/cm 525 C 925 C -925 C Chlorides '0.5 ppm 50.5 ppm 60.5 ppm (as Cl-)
pH 5.3 to 8.6 5.3 to 7.5 5.3 to 8.6 525 C 525 C 925 C Total 51 ppm 55 ppm suspended
~ sold.ds Sampling stations are provided for periodic analysis of reactor water, refueling and fuel storage pool water; and suppression pool water to assure compliance with operation limits of the plant technical specifications.
2.4 SPRAY/SUBMERGENCE The preferred design approach for Unit 2 was to locate safety-related components above postulated flood levels and away from sources of water spray, thereby eliminating the requirement for qualification under these conditions.
However, due to physical constraints of component and building arrangements, this is not feasible in some areas of the plant.
April 1985
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 EQD In general, only equipment in the primary containment is subject to spray/submergence conditions. Equipment located inside the primary containment is designed and qualified to perform its intended function under the conditions to which they are exposed. Equipment located in the containment below el 219 ft (Zone PC215121) will be submerged for a duration of up to 2 sec during suppression pool swell following a EOCA. This equipment is qualified to withstand the submergence conditions to which areas outside the primary containment, it is exposed. For flooding analyses were performed as described in FSAR Appendix 3C. These analyses demonstrate that electrical equipment required for safe shutdown of the plant either is located above submergence levels or protective measures are provided to prevent submergence.
2>>5 April 1985
0 Nine Nile Point Unit 2 EQD TABLE 2-1 HARSH ENVIPONNEHT ZOHES Zone Zone Zone Zone Zone Zone Zone Zone 7.one ABN17501 ET2 15239 PC250619 PC261 649 PC297697 SC196116 SC240143 SC306 17 5 SC261356 AB N17503 ET2 15242 PC250620 PC261 650 PC299698 SC196117 SC240 145 SC306 17 6 ABN19612 NST24044 PC250621 PC261651 PC299699 SC1 96118 SC240 146 SC306177 AB N17504 NST24045 PC 250622 PC279657 PC299700 SC196119 SC261147 SC306 178 ABN17505 MST26146 PC250 623 PC279658 PC299701 SC196120 SC261149 SC306 179 ABH19612 HST26147 PC250624 PC279659 PC303705 SC 196204 SC261150 SC306 180 ABN 19614 NST28948 PC250625 PC280663 PC303706 SC215122 SC2611 51 SC306181 ABN19615 NST28949 PC250626 PC280664 PC303707 SC2 15123 SC261 1 52 SC306182 ABN21521 PC175101 PC250627 PC280665 PC303711 SC2 151 24 SC289155 SC306 183 ABH21523 PC199112 PC250628 PC287669 PC306712 SC215125 SC289156 SC306 184 ABN21524 PC215121 PC250629 PC287670 PC306713 SC215127 SC289158 SC306215 ABH24031 PC240208 PC250630 PC287671 PC328185 RB240128 SC289159 SC328 186 ABN24032 PC240600 PC261 207 PC287672 RB240218 SC215129 SC289160 SC328 187 ABN24033 PC240601 PC261636 PC287673 SC175102 SC215130 SC289161 SC338189 ASS 17508 PC240602 PC261 637 PC287674 SC175103 SC 215131 SC289162 SC328192 ABS17509 PC240603 PC261 638 PC287679 SC175104 SC215132 SC289163 SC328 193 ABS17510 PC240604 PC261 639 PC289680 SC 175105 SC21 5205 SC289164 SC328 194 ABS 17511 PC240605 PC261640 PC289681 SC175106 SC215206 SC289165 SC328195 ABS1 9619 PC240606 PC261 641 PC289682 SC175107 SC240135 SC289166 SC328196 ABS19620 PC240607 PC261642 PC289683 SC175108 SC240136 SC 289 1 67 SC328 197 ABS21528 PC240608 PC261 643 PC289684 SC17 5109 SC240137 SC289168 SC328199 ABS24034 PC240609 PC261644 PC289685 SC175110 SC240138 SC289169 SC328221 ABS24035 PC240610 PC261645 PC289686 SC175111 SC240139 SC289170 SC328222 ABS24036 PC240611 PC261646 PC29769 1 SC175113 SC240140 SC289 172 SC353201 ABS24053 PC240612 PC261 647 PC297692 SC1751 14 SC2401 41 SC289 173 SC353202 ASB24054 PC240618 PC261648 PC297693 SC196115 SC240142 SC306 174 SC261 355 1 of 1 April 1985
Nine Nile Point Unit 2 EQD TABLE 2-2 MILD ENVERONMENT ZONES Zone Control Buildin El 215'-0" CB215258 Cable Vault Area CB215259 Cable Vault Area CB215305 Cable Vault Area CB215306 Cable Vault Area CB215307 Cable Vault Area El 237'-0" CB237261 Cable Vault Area CB237265 Cable Vault Area CB237266 Cable Vault Area CB237267 Cable Vault Area CB237272 Cable Vault Area CB237273 Cable Vault Area CB237274 Cable Vault Area El 250'-0" SW250364 Service Water Tunnel El 261'-0" CB261275 Standby Switchgear Room CB261276 Standby Switchgear Room CB261277 Standby Switchgear Room CB261279 Standby Switchgear Room CB2 61280 Standby Switchgear Room CB2 61281 Standby Switchgear Room CB2 61282 Standby Switchgear Room CB2 61283 Standby Switchgear Room CB2 61284 Standby Switchgear Room CB261286 Standby Switchgear Room CB261287 Standby Switchgear Room CB261288 Standby Switchgear Room CB261289 Standby Switchgear Room 1 of 4 April 1985
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 EQD TABLE 2-2 (Cont)
Zone CB261290 Standby Switchgear Room CB261292 Standby Switchgear Room CB261293 Standby Switchgear Room CB261294 Standby Switchgear Room CB261295 Standby Switchgear Room El 274'-0" CB274390 Standby Switchgear Room CB274391 ,Standby Switchgear Room El 289'-0" CB289296, Relay Room CB289297 Relay Room CB289298 Relay Room CB289301 Relay Room CB289394 Relay Room CB289395 Relay Room CB289396 Relay Room El 306'-0" CB306310 Control Bldg Passageway CB306311 Main Control Room CB306312 Main Control Room CB306313 Main Control Room CB306314 Main Control Room CB306315 Main Control Room CB306317 Main Control Room CB306321 Main Control Room Diesel Generator Buildin El 261'-0" DG261330 Diesel Generator Rooms DG261331 Diesel Generator Rooms DG261332 Diesel Generator Rooms DG261333 Diesel Generator Rooms DG261334 Diesel Generator Rooms DG261335 Diesel Generator Rooms 2 of 4 April 1985
0 Nine Mile Point Unit 2 EQD TABLE 2-2 (Cont)
Zone Descri tion El 272'-0" DG272337 Diesel Generator Rooms DG272338 Diesel Generator Rooms DG272339 Diesel Generator Rooms DG272340 Diesel Generator Rooms DG272341 Diesel Generator Rooms DG272342 Diesel Generator Rooms DG272343 Diesel Generator Rooms El 277'-0" DG277344 Diesel Generator Rooms DG277345 Diesel Generator Rooms DG277346 Diesel Generator Rooms Electrical Tunnels El 215'-0" ET215240 Electrical Tunnels ET215241 Electrical Tunnels ET215243 Electrical Tunnels ET215244 Electrical Tunnels Service Water Buildin El 224'-0" SW224365 Service Water Pump Room SW2243 66 Service Water Pump Room El 250'-0" SW250364 Service Water Pump Room El 261'-0" SW261367 Service Water Pump Room SW261368 Service Water Pump Room El 261'-0" SW261369 Screenwell Area 3 of 4 April 1985
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 EQD TABLE 2-2 (Cont)
Zone El 289'-0" TB289760 Turbine Bldg Intake Structures El 234'-0" ITK23490 Intake Structure El 285'-0" ITK28591 Intake Structure 4 of 4 Apri1 1985
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 EQD TABLE 2-3 THE INFORMATION ON THIS PAGE HAS BEEN DELETED.
1 of 1 April 1985
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 EQD TABLE 2-4 THE INFORMATION ON THIS PAGE HAS BEEN DELETED.
1 oZ 1 April 1985
Nine Mile Point Unit, 2 EQD SECTION 3 FUNCTIONAL PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS 3.1 SYSTEM LIST The systems required to mitigate an accident are listed in Table 3-1. This table also lists components/systems that are listed in Table 3.2-1 of the FSAR which have a quality group classification of A, B, or C, or designated either. QA Category I or Seismic Category I.
3.2 SYSTEM/ACCIDENT MATRIX The system/accident matrix shown in Table 3-2 identifies those systems that are required to, respond to accidents which result in harsh environments.
As discussed in Sections 2.1 and 2.2 and the EQEDC, generally only two of the several design basis accidents discussed in FSAR Section 15 and FSAR Appendix 15A are used to define harsh environment for equipment qualification.
These two accidents, loss of coolant accident inside the primary containment and high energy line break outside the containment, envelop all other plant conditions with respect to their effect on the equipment environment.
For some components, this worst case combination of accident and environmental conditions results in qualification problems. In these instances, an evaluation was performed to develop the environmental conditions for the accidents in which these components are required to operate. These conditions then become the basis for their qualification.
ll Not all systems listed in Table 3-1 include equipment located in harsh environments'ome components listed in Table 3-1 are not required to operate following accident conditions and therefore do not requir'e harsh environment qualification. Justification for this is given in the notes to Table 3-2. A cross reference of GE and SWEC systems is given in Table. 3-3.
3' POST-ACCIDENT OPERABILITY TIME Equipment must be qualified for the length of time it is required to perform its safety function and must remain in a safe mode after the function is performed. The length of time the equipment is required to function following the onset of an accident is its post-accident operability period April 1985
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 EQD (PAOP). Equipment can have a PAOP that ranges from a short time period, but not less than 1 hr immediately following the onset of an accident, to 100 days for components requiring operation for an extended period after the onset of an accident.
The approach to determine operability times is similar to that used for accident conditions in that the most limiti'ng case is used for environmental qualification. In most cases, post accident operability time is based on the accident requiring the longest functional capability. This is combined with the worst case accident environment, even though a shorter PAOP may be applicable.
3-2 April 1985
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 EQD TABLE 3-1 SYSTEMS LIST Abbreviation ~S stem ISC Reactor System and Nuclear Boiler CIS Containment Isolation (See Note 1 to Table 3.1-2)
Control Rod Drive SLS Standby Liquid Control NMS/TIP Neutron Monitoring/Traversing Incore Probe RPS Reactor Protection System LDS Leak Detection (See Note 2 to Table 3.1-2)
PRM/ARM Process Radiation Monitoring/Area Radiation Monitoring RHS Residual Heat Removal CSL Low Pressure Core Spray CSH High Pressure Core Spray ICS Reactor Core Isolation Cooling FHE Fuel Service, Reactor Vessel, Invessel, Storage, and Refueling Equipment SFC Spent Fuel Pool Cooling ADS/SVV Automatic Depressurization/Main Steam Safety Relief IAS Instrument Air SWP Service Water GTS Standby Gas Treatment EGS Emergency Diesel Generators (including CSH DG)
EGF Diesel Generator Fuel Oil (including CSH DG) 1 of 2 April 1985
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 EQD TABLE 3-1 (Cont)
Abbreviation ~system EGA Diesel Generator Starting Air (including CSH DG)
CMS Containment Monitoring GSN Nitrogen Inerting HCS Hydrogen Recombiner HVK Control Building Chilled Water HVR Reactor Building Ventilation Diesel Generator Building Ventilation Yard Structures Ventilation HVC Control Building Air Conditioning ACP Auxiliary AC Power System (Normal or Emergency)
DCP DC Power Systems (Normal or Emergency)
RPC Reactor Building Polar Crane RRS Redundant Reactivity Control CNS Condensate Makeup/Drawoff DFM Miscellaneous Floor Drains DWS Domestic Water System TME Turbine Gland Seal and Exhaust ASS Auxiliary Steam a
2 of 2 April 1985
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 EQD TABLE 3-2 SYSTEM/ACCIDENT MATRIX FSAR Accident Abbreviation Reference Control Rod Drop Accident CRDA 15.4.9 Fuel Handling Accident 15.7.4 Loss of Coolant Accident LOCA 15.6.5 (inside primary containment)
High Energy Line Break (ICS/WCS) HELB 15.6.4 (outside primary containment)
Main Steam Line Break MSLB 15.6.4 (outside primary containment)
Feedwater Line Break FWLB 15. 6 6
~
(outside primary containment)
Anticipated Transients Without ATWS 15.8 Scram 1 of 5 April 1985
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 EQD TABI,E 3-2 (Cont)
Accident
~Sstem CRDA FHA LOCA HELB MSLB FWLB ATWS CIS<>>
ISC SLS NNS/TIP RPS X X LDS<>> X X PRM/ARM X X X RHS CSL X CSH ICS FHE<>>
SFC IAS ADS/SVV SWP GTS EGS<>>
EGF(7) 2 of 5 April 1985
0 Nine Mile Point Unit 2 EQD TABLE 3-2 (Cont)
Accident
~Sstem CRDA FHA LOCA HELB MSLB FWLB ATWS EGA<>> X X X X X X X CMS X X X X GSN' X X X X X HCS HVK<>>
HVR HVP<>>
HVC<>> X X ACP X X DCP X X RPC<<>
RRS<>>
CNS<>>
DWS<<>
TME<<>
ASS<<>
3 of 5 April 1985
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 EQD TABLE 3-2 (Cont)
Notes C I S, primar y containment isolation, includes the following systems whose only post-accident function is primary containment isolation (unless otherwise noted):
Reactor coolant system (RCS) (also serves an ATWS function) (
Reactor water cleanup system (WCS) (also serves an ATWS function and is part of LDS)
Service air system (SAS)
Breathing air system (AAS)
Reactor building closed loop cooling water system (CCP) (interface isolation with service water)
~ Main steam system (MSS) (also part of ADS/SW and LDS)
~ Feedwater system (FWS) (also serves an ATWS
. function)
~ Containment purge system (CPS)
~ Reactor building floor and equipment drain systems (DFR, DER) (also part of LDS)
~ Fire protection system (FPW)
~ Leakage monitoring system (LMS)
LDS, the leak detection system, includes temperature, flow, and/or level instrumentation, in the following systems:
Main steam system (MSS)
Reactor system (ISC)
Reactor core isolation cooling system (ICS)
Reactor building floor and equipment drain systems (DFR, DER)
Residual heat removal system (RHS) 4 of 5 April 1985
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 EQD TABLE 3-2 (Cont)
Reactor water cleanup system (WCS)
FHE, which includes fuel service, reactor vessel, invessel, storage, and refueling equipment, performs no post accident function. Selected components are seismically qualified to ensure proper functioning during refueling operations. Refer to FSAR Section 9.1.
'4'PC, the reactor building polar crane, performs no post accident function. The crane is seismically qualified to prevent failure that could jeopardize safe operation of the reactor and to ensure proper functioning during refueling operations. Refer to FSAR Section 9.1.
One CNS boundary valve is used to prevent bypass leakage in the event of a LOCA inside the primary containment.
DWS, ASS, and TME require QA Category I components based on special system considerations'o environmental qualification is required.
No equipment for these systems is included in the Master List for 10CFR50.49(b) on the basis that in a mild environment.
it is located GSN is required to maintain piping pressure integrity for makeup Nz supply to IAS. No QA Category I electrical equipment is required.
5 of 5 April 1985
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 EQD TABLE 3-3 SWEC/GE SYSTEM CROSS REFERENCE
~Setem SWEC Code GE Code Nuclear Boiler ISC B22 Mainsteam MSS B22 Feedwater FWS B22 Automatic Depressurization ADS B22 Recirculation RCS B35 Control Rod Drive C12 Redundant Reactivity Control RRS C22 Standby Liquid Control SLS C41 Neutron Monitoring NMS C51 Process Radiation Monitoring D13 Residual Heat Removal RHS E12 Low-Pressure Core Spray CSI E21 High-Pressure Core Spray CSH E22 Leak Detection LDS E31 Reactor Core Isolation Cooling ICS E51 Reactor Water Cleanup WCS G33 1 oZ 1 April 1985
Nine Mile "Point Unit.2 EQD SECTION 4.
QUALIFICATION METHODOLOGY 4.1 HARSH ENVIRONMENT 4.1.1 BOP Equipment, Electrical The 'ethodology established for the equipment qualification program is in accordance with the guidelines provided in NUREG-0588 for Category II plants and consistent ,with applicable Regulatory Guides and consensus national standards (ANSI and IEEE), and in compliance with the requirements of 10CFR50.49. The methodology consists of developing the Equipment Qualification Environmental Design Criteria (EQEDC), which establishes the temperature, pressure, humidity, and radiation dose levels, for normal, abnormal, and'ccident conditions. = Post-accident operability time is developed to assure that the equipment will be qualified to maintain a safety function during a post-accident event.
These requirements are included in the procurement specification for the safety related electrical equipment.
The specification mandates that the qualification will be accomplished in accordance with IEEE 323-1974 and in accordance -with the quality assurance program referenced in 10CFR50 Appendix B.
Based on these specification requirements, the equipment manufacturer develops an equipment qualification program.
Safety-related equipment is evaluated by comparing the environmental conditions by which equipment operability has been demonstrated with required conditions. This evaluation includes review for both 40-yr normal and abnormal environments and accident environments resulting from a spectrum of LOCAs and HELBs. The equipment justification is considered acceptable when it, is demonstrated that equipment can perform its required safety function under postulated environmental conditions.
All qualification testing and analysis of safety-related equipment are being evaluated for compliance with Category II NUREG-0588 guidelines. Equipment testing, is reviewed conditions to determine and the provides extent to which it simulates plant sufficient margin. Factors considered during the review of testing include test April 1985
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 EQD procedures, test setup, test sequence, margin, and test anomalies.
Supplemental analyses (i.e., beta shielding thermal degradation) are performed, as required, to support qualification. All analyses based on partial test data are completed using approved methodologies with adequate justification. Equipment specific analyses are contained in the EQ file along with appropriate justification.
System Component Evaluation Work (SCEW) sheet is completed A
for each equipment/component listed on the master (Appendix A), with the results of the qualification document li st review, in summarized form. A SCEW sheet with a description of . its entries is provided in Section 5.2 of this document.
SCEW sheets demonstrate that each required parameter is enveloped by the qualified values. Additionally, SCEW sheets provide equipment description, safety function, qualified life, and references of all applicable qualification documents and explanatory notes.
Acji~n Aging effects on all safety-related electrical equipment are considered in the EQ 'program to conform to the requirements of Section 4 of NUREG-0588.
Arrhenius aging methodology is'sed for accelerated thermal aging and is the preferred method for evaluating equipment aging. When other methods are used, appropriate justification is provided.
In the case where accelerated aging was used, the procedure employed considered the expected application and design life of the device being tested.
Synergistic effects, where known, are considered in the ~
accelerated aging program. Specifically, where a supplier has 'dentified or is aware of synergistic effects for a particular component, it has been addressed.
documentation is included in the EQ file.
Appropriate Where required, a maintenance or replacement schedule consistent with qualified life is provided as part of the support documentation and is referenced on the SCEW sheets.
When type testing was selected as the qualification method, the type test was run on the device(s) 'in a specified sequence that was set down as part of the written test procedure. All sequential testing .was performed on the same April 1985
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 EQD unit(s), including aging.. .The sequence given in IEEE 323-1974, Paragraph 6.3.2, is used, where. an alternate sequence can be justified technically. This justification is documented in the qualification reports.
~arcain Qualification type test results were reviewed -to verify that adequate margin exists between the most severe specified service conditions for the equipment and the conditions used in type testing. Margins are in addition to any conservatism applied during the 'erivation of local environmental conditions of the equipment. Margin accounts for production variations of equipment and inaccuracies in test instrumentation; Increased levels of testing, number of test cycles, and test duration are among the methods used for ensuring adequate margin.
Some equipment is required by the design,to perform its safety function only within the first 10. hr of an accident.
For this equipment in general, a time margin of at least 1 hr in excess of the time assumed in the accident analysis was used.
For all other equipment, the 10-percent time margin
'identified in IEEE 323-1974 was used unless a reduced amount could be justified.
Dose Rate and S ner istic Effects Qualification for radiation was based on the calculated total'ntegrated dose. Safety-related electrical equipment qualified for use in a nuclear radiation environment was exposed to radiation which simulated the conservatively calculated integrated dose (normal and accident) that the equipment is expected to withstand prior to completion of its intended safety function. In general, simulate a gamma radiation source, typically C0-60, is used to expected radiation exposure. Where beta and gamma radiation exposure is expected, beta radiation is taken into account either during simulated exposure (directly or as a gamma equivalent) 'or 'during evaluation of the results. Reduction in the total beta dose was allowed only after considering appropriate shielding factors. If the beta radiation dose contribution to the equipment or component was calculated to be less than 10 percent of the total gamma radiation dose to which the equipment or component. had been qualified, then the equipment or component was considered qualified for the beta and gamma radiation environment.
Apri1 1985
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 EQD.
The dose rate, energy spectrum, or particle type was addressed to arrive at a gamma equivalent total dose to which the equipment must be exposed. Actual testing using dose rate, energy spectrum, or particle type as qualification parameters was not considered.
Synergistic effects involving dose rate are not addressed.
However; where synergistic effects of radiation and temperature were identified prior to the initiation of qualification, they are included in the program.
~Anal sis The use of analysis for qualification is in conformance with 10CFR50.49(f).
4.1.2 NSSS Equipment Electrical Safety-related electric NSSS equipment located in a harsh environment includes all three categories of 10CFR50.49(b).
A Master List of this equipment is provided in Appendix A.
Category 1, 10CFR50.49(b) equipment is that equipment classified by the NSSS vendor as safety-related in the Master 'Parts List (MPL). Category 2, 10CFR50.49(b) equipment has been identified through review of the electrical connections for all equipment classified as nonsafety-related in the MPL. Those items connected to ESF or RPS power without being electrically separated in accordance with Regulatory Guide 1.75 are included in the qualification program'. Category 3, 10CFR50.49(b) equipment has been identified and is included in the qualification program.
The approach taken by General Electric to environmentally qualify safety-related equipment within the NSSS Scope of Supply for Unit 2 to a level consistent with NUREG-0588 is described in the GE Licensing Topical Report NEDE-24326-1-P': This report has been approved by the NRC. The methodology described in this report is consistent with applicable Regulations (10CFR50 Appendix A), applicable Regulatory Guides, and with applicable consensus national standards (ANSI and IEEE). The work performed under this guidance is controlled in a manner consistent with the commitments contained in the NRC-approved GE Licensing Topical Report on Quality Assurance.
The approach to qualification described in NEDE-24326-1-P'~'s predicated on type testing being the preferred approach.
Depending upon either the unique characteristics of the April 1985
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 EQD specific devices or on the availability of other sources of qualification data, other approaches such as partial type test with justification by analysis, operating experience, analysis or combination of the above mentioned approaches may be used. For any 'of these approaches the -eventual approach used is justified in the accompanying qualification report. This justification is based on the demonstrated ability of the product to meet its intended safety function.
Where type testing is performed, the approach usually taken is as follows:
- 1. Assure the device is functional under normal conditions as well as under extremes of such conditions.
- 2. Device is aged to an end-of-qualified life condition.
- 3. Device is subjected to dynamic simulation.
- 4. Device is subjected to design basis event conditions and post design basis event conditions.
- 5. Device is inspected for failures which may not have been apparent during the operational testing which may have occurred during exposure to an environmental extreme.
The specific sequence of tests undertaken during environmental qualification may vary depending upon the function of the device and the nature of the event for which qualification is being demonstrated. The associated qualification report contains a justification of the actual sequence used. When a product is tested, where practical, the interface associated with the product is included in the test. The specific sequences of environments applied during
~ the testing are determined, using engineering judgment, to best select the sequence to which the product, would be subjected during actual installation. Furthermore, where synergisms between environments are known, these effects are taken into consideration during the planning and conducting of the test. All tests that are conducted include adequate margins as described in NEDE-24361-1-P'4'.
Following the completion of the tests all of the associated documentation that led to the test and was generated during the test is formally assembled into a qualification report.
That report is available for NRC audit.
April 1985
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 EQD For devices not qualified by test (e'.g., devices classified as safety-related solely because they perform a pressure boundary function; devices that perform their safety function prior to the onset of harsh environments in which they do not contribute to the mitigation of the event after performance of the intended safety function, etc) qualification reports are also prepared demonstrating the adequacy of their qualification. As with devices qualified by test, these qualification reports are in an auditable form. The last step of qualification is to ensure that the device tested is similar to the device installed in the field. Therefore, before full qualification can be assured, there is a verification of the similarity between the tested device and the installed device.
4.1.3 BOP/NSSS Equipment Mechanical The Mechanical Equipment Qualification (MEQ) Program provides a documented analysis of the nonmetallic materials, used in safety-related mechanical equipment, to demonstrate that the environmental effects due to plant operation and postulated accidents would not degrade these materials in such a way as to prevent this equipment from performing its required safety function.
The MEQ Program details the environmental design conformance review of safety-related mechanical equipment located in a harsh environment. The conformance review includes nonmetallic subcomponents of mechanical equipment. Safety-I related mechanical equipment included in the MEQ program is identified in Appendix D. Environmental conditions listed in the EQEDC are used as the basis for the MEQ review.
Generally, mechanical equipment has not been shown to be as sensitive to radiation exposure as electrical components.
Metallic portions of the equipment are particularly resistant to radiation. Nonmetallic parts of mechanical equipment, while more sensitive to radiation and temperature, are used in the equipment so that, the degradation of mechanical properties will not substantially affect the required safety function of the component.
The review consists of the following five-step process.
- 1. Identification of safety-related mechanical equipment
- 2. Identif ication of nonmetallic components April 1985
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 EQD
- 3. Identification of environmental design conditions-
- 4. Identification of nonmetallic material capabilities
- 5. Evaluation of environmental effects The MEQ Program consists of analyses of safety-related equipment located in systems required for the following functions:
- l. Emergency reactor shutdown
- 2. Emergency core cooling (short-term)
- 3. Reactor core cooling (long-term post accident)
- 4. Primary containment isolation
- 5. Containment integrity
- 6. Prevention of release of radioactive material To accomplish the above functions, complete systems and portions of systems are included in the MEQ Program.
Category I mechanical equipment within those systems that are located in a harsh environment,, and required for performance of the above functions, are included in the MEQ Program. The review is performed by using the specifications, SWEC drawings, vendor drawings, and manuals.
Of the environmental conditions (temperature, pressure, humidity, and radiation) only radiation and temperature were considered in the review. Pressure and humidity were not considered relevant since the design of nonmetallic portions of mechanical equipment for these parameters is governed by system process conditions .which have been identified in the specification and addressed by the equipment manufacturer.
Each material identified was examined to determine the effect of the environmental conditions on the material April 1985
Nine Mile Point-"Unit 2 EQD properties. For initial screening, it was conservatively chosen to use the threshold radiation level and maximum service temperature. Materials handbooks, textbooks, and industry and government reports were researched to obtain material data. In some cases vendor data were utilized to supplement the above sources.
A conservative initial screening of the nonmetallic
,components was made by the comparison of the material capabilities (threshold radiation level and maximum service temperature) with the maximum postulated environmental conditions. Those items which were not shown to be acceptable based on the comparison were evaluated in further~
detail considering:
- 1. Degree of material degradation.
- 2. Material properties affected.
3 . Equi pmentgc omponent func tion.
- 4. Degree of functional degradation.
Acce tance Criteria In order to be considered acceptable, nonmetallic portions of mechanical equipment must either be shown to be acceptable for the plant environment by either of the following:
- 1. Exhibiting threshold radiation values and maximum service temperatures above the maximum postulated environmental conditions.
- 2. Demonstrating by engineering analysis of material capabilities and function that the safety function of the component is not compromised.
4.2 MILD ENVIRONMENT Mild environment plant areas are listed in Table 2-2.
The Unit 2 classification of mild environment zones complies with 10CFR50.49(c) ~ Safety-related equipment in these zones is located outside the containment and is not subject to accident environments caused by a LOCA or pipe break. In these zones, there is no significant change in environmental conditions, except radiation.
April 1985
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 EQD For a zone to be classified as mild, the total integrated dose for 40 yr plus 100 days post-accident service is no more ".than . 10~ rads and generally less than 103 rads. This value is conservative since organic compounds with the least radiation resistance have damage thresholds greater than 104 rads. Most electronic components have a threshold damage level above 10" rads. Semiconductors, in particular, metal oxide semiconductor (MOS) devices, have a threshold damage level in the range of 10 to 10" rads. N-channel metal oxide semiconductor (NMOS) devices are most vulnerable to radiation damage; the failure dose can be as low as 10 rads (Si)'. The damage is usually caused by total dose gamma radiation. No damage was identified due to beta radiation. Semiconductor devices are resistant to beta radiation since they are sealed in molded plastic, ceramic-to-metal, or glass-to-metal packages. Neutron radiation may cause damage in semiconductor devices; however, there is no neutron radiation in mild environment zones. Dose rate thresholds are higher than total dose damage threshold
~
levels. The lowest threshold for dose rate upset, is 10~ rads (Si)/s for silicon4-controlled rectifiers, and dose rate damage occurs above 10 rads (Si)/s'. Since the maximum dose rate for these zones is much lower than the above threshold levels, no transient or permanent failures will occur in any mild environment zones due to dose rate
. effects.
Radiation effects on the above conditions in a mild environment are considered negligible because the calculated radiation doses for mild environment, zones are less than 10" rads with the highest dose calculated to be 912 rads for the HVAC rooms.
The radiation required to produce one rad in silicon (Si) is 1.15 R in the energy range of 0.5 to 1.0 Mev
Therefore, semiconductor devices, including MOS devices, are considered qualified for the Unit 2 specific radiation exposure.
Equipment located in the zones listed in Table 2-2 are not exposed to environmental conditions that may cause common mode failures due to environmental conditions during DBE.
Immediate access following a DBE is not required other than normal and periodic maintenance. Therefore, these plant zones may be considered mild environment areas'pri 1 1985
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 EQD 4.2.1 -BOP Equipment Mild Environment Qualification Program Safety- related equipment located in a mild environment meeting the following requirements is considered adequately qualified.
A Certificate of Compliance (C of C) stating that the functional requirements of the equipment subjected to the specified Unit 2 environmental conditions have been met.
- 2. The C of C shall identify the supplied equipment by equipment mark number.
4-9a April 1985
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 EQD THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK 4-9b April 1985
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 EQD
- 3. The equipment has been manufactured in accordance with a quality assurance program that meets the requirements of 10CFR50, Appendix B, and states compliance with 10CFR21.
The requirements for any scheduled surveillance, maintenance calibration, periodic tests, and parts replacements necessary to maintain qualification are specified.
4.2.2 NSSS Mild Environment Qualification Program Safety-related NSSS vendor-supplied equipment that is located in a mild environment is considered qualified if:
- 1. The equipment manufacturer's design environmental parameters envelop the Unit 2 specific environment.
- 2. The equipment manufacturer's design functional characteristics envelop the Unit 2 application specific functional performance requirements.
- 3. The NSSS vendor provides a Product Quality Certification (PQC) in accordance with NEDO 11209'he PQC establishes a tie between the supplied item and the respective equipment drawing which in turn provides further reference to the applicable environmental and functional performance specifications.
4- 10 April 1985
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 EQD TABLE 4-1 THE INFORMATION ON THIS PAGE HAS BEEN DELETED.
1 of 1 April 1985
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 EQD SECTION 5 QUALIFICATION DOCUMENTATION 5.1 MASTER LISTS (ML)
The equipment and components that are within the scope"of 10CFR50.49(b) are listed in the ML in Appendix A and are included in the qualification program.
This list includes 10CFR50.49(b) equipment categories 1, 2, and 3 ~
All safety-related equipment added as a result of the TMI action items (see CESAR section 1.10) have been included in the Unit 2 qualification program and qualified as required.
The ML includes the following:
required Tables
'o Equipment/components 3-1 mitigate and 3-2 associated with the systems an and accident located listed in in harsh environment. (Category 1, 10CFR50.49(b).
- 2. Post-accident monitoring equipment located in harsh environment, and specified as Category 1 and 2, Revision 2 of Regulatory Guide 1.97.
Nonsafety-related equipment/components are not connected to safety-related power buses without being electrically separated in accordance with Regulatory Guide 1.75 and IEEE 384 (see FSAR Sections 8.3.1.4.1 and 8.3.1.1.2), except for the stub=bus loads (see FSAR Tables 8.3-1 and 8.3-4).
The stub busses are tripped on LOCA signal.
Therefore, nonsafety-related equipment, is not included in the list.
An important feature of the ML is'ts all qualification documentation associated capability to identify with of the listed safety-related electrical equipment oranycomponents through reference to the associated SCEW sheets for that particular equipment or component. =
The identity of any qualification'ocument associated with any of the listed items can , be accessed through either the individual equipment identification number, ( e. g., 2CSL*FV114) or through a generic equipment manufacturer and model number (e.g., Rosemount 1153B pressure transmitter).
5-1 April 1985
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 EQD Examples- of documentation accessible through the MI reference to the SCEN sheets are purchase specifications, vendor records (e.g., test plans and test reports), and SWEC-generated documentation (e.g., aging analyses of mechanical equipment and equipment operability periods).
For each device, the ML provides a summary of the key elements of the Environmental Qual ification Program.
Tables 5-la and 5-lb contain the heading for the ML, with a
! description of each entry. For BOP equipment, the first four characters of the device indicate the unit number and the major system in which the device is used. For NSSS equipment, the major system in which the device is used is indicated by the first three characters of the mark number.
The subsequent characters are used to further segregate the devices by specific type and number.
5.2 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK (SCEW) SHEET The SCEW sheet presents a description of the individual equipment and its location. A comparison is made, in summary, of the actual environmental parameters of. the zone specified, with the. environmental parameters encompas'sed in the qualification program. It also contains references to all of the supportive environmental qualification documents which demonstrate that the equipment is qualified to perform its safety function .in the postulated environmental conditions.
Reference to the qualification documents that contain detailed supporting information, including test data, can be found listed in the individual equipment. or component SCEW sheet.
v In general, there is a SCEW 'sheet for every line item on the MLS Some SCEW sheets may consist of more than one page when the individual equipment has components which are located in different zones or are otherwise qualified separately.
Referenced documents are test reports and other such items that are retained in Supplier's Document Data Form (SDDF) files. Other documents which may, be referenced . are equipment specifications, Equipment Qualification Environmental Design Criteria (EQEDC), and,calculations of composite environmental zone profiles, qualified life and supplemental analyses for equivalent-.gamma radiation and the post-accident operability period.
5-2 April 1985
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 EQD SCEW sheets are compiled in Appendix B.
Associated with the SCEW sheets are graphs of time dependent environmental parameters, such as temperature and pressure for both specified accident conditions and qualification test conditions. These profiles of accident and test conditions are compiled in Appendix C and may be used for comparison of the applicable accident conditions and zones to the environment simulated in the qualification test.
5-3 April 1985
Nine Nile Point Unit 2 EQD TABLE 5-1 EQUIPNENT QUALIFICATION NASTER LIST ENVIRONNENTAL QUALIFICATION EQUIP 'QUIP DESCRIPTION<>~ ZONE~<> OP/CD<8~
ID<>> VENDOR NANE<>> SPEC<+> EO STAT<5> ZIND~>> CP TINE~~~ QUAL REF<>o> RENA'RKS<><~
Equipment I.D. indicates identifying number of SWEC equipment {the first four characters of which correspond to the unit number and ma)or system in which the equipment is used) .
Example: 2CSL~PV 1 14.
Equipment Description - brief description of equipment.
Vendor Name - Indicates prime supplier per purchase order.
Spec - Indicates procurement specification number.
EQ Stat - status of vendor-supplied documentation with respect to equipment qualification.
The following codes are used:
A - Approved B - Vendor qualification reports submitted but not approved C - Only qual test plan has been submitted D - Documentation has not been submitted by vendor Zone Indicates plant specific area where equipment/component is located.
Zind - Indicates type of environment, i.e., harsh, mild.
OP/CD - Indicates the operability code category associated with the equipment/component with regard to Appendix E, NUREG 0588, Item 3..
OP Time Indicates period of time following the onset of an accident during which the equipment/component must remain capable of performing its safety function {operability time) .
Qual REf - Indicates the qualification reference number of the SCEN {System Component Evaluation Work) Sheet.
Remarks - Indicates where special notes or further data may be entered concerning the equipment/component and its qualification.
Amendment 16 1 of 1 December 1984
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 EQD TABLE 5-2 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK (SCEW)
SHEET PARAMETERS Item Qualification reference number (QUAL REF NUMBER) that identifies the SCEW sheet is a 7-character alphanumeric number used for document identification and computer storage and retrieval. It number is made up of the five digits of the specification and a 2-character alphabetic equipment number code.
<2) SCEW sheet revision level.
( 3) Equipment number as (ML). Each ML line item itwill appears on the Master have at least one List SCEW Sheet.
Specification number of the specification that pertains to the particular equipment.
(5) Name of the system that is represented by the 3-character system code in the equipment number.
(6) Short description of the equipment.
(7) Name of the manufacturer of the equipment, which will not necessarily be the same as the vendor.
(8) Manufacturer' model number.
<9) Brief description of the safety function that the equipment is required to perform.
(10) Indicates the operability code category associated with the equipment/component with regard to Appendix B, NUREG-0588. In cases where qualified operational time is less than 100 days, Code A is used for the specified duration it is required to operate, and Code C for the remaining duration of the accident, based on justification for Code E and the results of the FMEA study.
(11) Specified and demonstrated accuracy of the item (e.g., instruments).
Amendment, 16 1 of 4 December 1984
Nine Mile Point Unit, 2 EQD TABLE 5-2 (Cont)
(12) Environmental zone in which the equipment is located.
'13,14, NA (Not Applicable) 15)
(16) ACCEPTABLE TO for all qualified equipment; QUALIFICATION IN PROGRESS on the line below for all other cases. k (17) If maintenance/surveillance maintain environmental is not required to qualification, NA; If maintenance/surveillance is required, the document reference number has been entered. Any special maintenance/surveillance requirements will be referenced or noted on the SCEW sheets.
(18) The number of years of qualified life.
(19) The reference number of the document or calculation, which supports the qualified life entry.
(2a) Entries in this column are the maximum values for each parameter. These entries represent the actual conditions to which the equipment will be exposed in its location.
a ~ Operational Time: specified operability time from equipment operability time data sheet (where applicable; if not, 100 days).
Reference is made to applicable operability time data sheet.
- b. Temperature: EQEDC values.
C. Pressure: EQEDC values.
- d. RH(percent): EQEDC values for normal and accident; NA for abnormal.
- e. Radiation: EQEDC values.
- 1) Acc. Gamma: 100 days value for both inside and outside primary contain-ment.
Amendment 16 2 of 4 December 1984"
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 EQD TABLE 5-2 (Cont)
- 2) Acc. Beta: 180 days value for inside pri-mary containment and 100 days value for outside primary con-tainment.
Spray/Submergence: Submergence is applicable to equipment located in the primary containment wet-well. Spray effects are considered for all lE equipment/components . sub-ject to spray conditions.
(21) Entries in this column are the maximum values for each parameter. These entries represent the actual test conditions to which the equipment was qualified.
- a. Operational Time
- 1) If the equipment is qualified for 100 days, 100 days is entered, specified operational time even is if the less than 100 days.
- 2) If the equipment is than 100 days but meets qualified for less or exceeds the specified operational time, a FMEA study has been initiated for 100 days.
- b. Temperature: In cases where vendor-tested
'temperature/pressure profile is for 30 days, a calculation was prepared for extending from 30 days to 100 days and referenced accordingly.
Vendor concurrence on the calculation has been obtained.
C. Radiation: The vendor-tested value (one value) includes both normal and accident dose. Any calculation prepared to compute equivalent gamma are referenced.
- d. Spray/'Submergence: "Yes" has been entered for the equipment tested for spray/submergence (or)
LOCA by the vendor. NA has been entered in all other cases.
Documents which support the conditions given in Amendment 16 3 of 4 December 1984
0 Nine Mile Point Unit 2 EQD TABIE 5-2 (Cont)
Entries 20 and 21 are listed in Entry 23 with specific 'reference file numbers; the document reference number appears in the specified or qualified columns of Entry 22.
(24) The qualification method used was entered using the following abbreviations, as applicable (see 10CFR50.49 for definitions); Test,-Ident; Test-Sim; An + Data; Exp + An
<25) Margin demonstration indicated by "Yes" or "No."
Necessary remarks to explain or justify entries.
Actual remarks are placed in notes in Entry 27, and the note reference numbers placed in Entry 26
'mendment 16 4 of 4 December 1984
Nine Nile Point Unit 2 EQD TABLE 5-1A EQUIPHENT QUALIFICATION HASTEP. LIST ENVIRONHENTAL {}UALIPICATION (BOP)
~EUIPHRNT IDC < > DESCRIPTION<a> VENDOP NAHRC>> SPEC~ +> EQ STATCs3 ZONE<~> ZNINDC>3 9UAL REPCS>
REH(!RKS<+>
A>> EOUIPHENT I.D. - indicates identifying number of the eguipaent. The first four characters correspond to the unit number and ma)or system in vhich the eguipment is used. Example: 2CSL*PV110.
<<> DESCRIPTION - brief description of eguipment.
<>> VENDOR NAHE - indicates prime supplier per purchase order.
SPEC - indicates procurement specification number.
<<> EQ STAT - status of vendor-supplied documentation vith respect to equipment qualification The folloving codes are used:
A- Approved.
B Vendor gualif'ation reports submitted but not approved.
C- Only qual test plan has been submitted.
D- Documentation has not been submitted by vendor.
<<~ ZONE - indicates plant specific area vhere equipment/component is located.
<>> ZNIND - indicates type of environaent, i.e., harsh, mild.
<>> QUAL REF - indicates gualification reference nuaber of SCEL'System Component Evaluation Nork) sheet.
<>> REHAPKS - indicates vhere special notes or further data may be entered concerning eguipaent/component and its qualification.
1 of 1 April 1985
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 EOD TABLE 5-1B 12/84 REVISION: 01 ISSUE DATE: 12/21/84 NMP2-ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION DATA MASTER LIST (NSSS)
MARK NO SW EC ID<>> E UIPMENT DESCRIPTION< >> REMARKS<8> ENV ZONEC+> ENVTYPC 5) PgU ALST< + > gUAL REF<> >
<>> MARK NO. - indicates GE's identifying number for the NSS supplied equipment. The first three characters of which correspond to GE's ma)or system in which the equipment is used. Example: B22-N07SA
<<> SWEC I.D. - indicates SWEC' identifying number for the NSSS suppli.ed equipment. The first four the unit number and ma)or system in which the equi.pment is used. Example: 2CNM+PT46A. Where a characters correspond to SWEC identifying number does not exist, a four-character system code may be assigned for sorting purposes.
<>> EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION - brief description of eguipment.
<~> ENV. ZONE - indicates plant specific areas where eguipment/component is located.
<<> ENVTYP - indicates type of environment, i.e. ~ harsh, mild.
<<~ EQUALST - status of documentation with respect to eguipment qualification. The following codes are used:
A - Approved.
B Qualification reports completed but not approved.
- Only C
- gualification test plan .has been completed.
D No documentation has been completed.
<>> QUAL PEF - indicates the qualification reference number of the SCEN (System Component Evaluation 'Work) sheet.
<<> REMARKS - indicates where special notes or further data may be entered concerning the equipment/component and its qualification.
1 of 1 April 1985
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 EQD TABLE 5-2 THE INFORMATION ON THIS PAGE HAS BEEN DELETED.
1 of 1 April 1985
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 EQD FIGURE 5-1 THE INFORMATION ON THIS PAGE HAS BEEN DELETED.
1 of 1 April 1985
Nine .Mile Point Unit 2 EQD SECTION 6 MAINTENANCE/SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM A preventive maintenance and surveillance program is being developed by NMPC to ensure the continued environmental qualification of equipment, during plant operation.
The objectives of this preventive maintenance and surveillance program are and to ensure'hat the qualified equipment will perform its intended function in the.
environment in which it maintain retrievable records.
is expected to operate and to The list of environmentally qualified equipment identifies equipment to be included in the preventive maintenance and surveillance program. The list will be kept current, to include mechanical equipment and ensure that equipment added to the plant because of design modifications is incorporated into the qualification program and the preventive maintenance and surveillance program.
For each piece of equipment, a preventive maintenance and surveillance program is being developed based on information such as requirements resulting from the equipment qualification report, and Unit 2 plant specific thermal and radiation qualified life calculations, manufacturer's recommendations, previous experience with similar equipment, etc. The qualification specific requirements are identified for each piece of equipment.
The initially developed preventive maintenance and if surveillance programs will be modified during plant life additional information, such as corrective maintenance frequency, surveillance testing, and industry experience (e. g., NRC information notices, circulars or bulletins, manufacturers'lert, LER's, reliability data bases, etc.),
identifies any unanticipated degradation trends. In addition, the preventive maintenance and surveillance program identifies the lubricants suitable for each application and environment. These preventive maintenance and surveillance activities are performed by personnel using detailed procedures, as necessary.
The plant maintenance program will incorporate the scheduling and documentation of maintenance requirements and activities. Schedules will identify when equipment maintenance, replacement, testing, or calibration is required. Appropriate plant departments will complete. the 6-1 April 1985
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 EQD work. On completion of scheduled activities, a notification will be made indicating work completion, which will document completion and facilitate rescheduling. This scheduling program will be used to alert appropriate plant departments of preventive maintenance, surveillance, and replacement requirements for environmentally qualified equipment.
Quality assurance and control programs will require inspections, verifications, and audits of activities and procedures important to safety. These programs will be performed on environmentally qualified equipment to ensure that schedules, maintenance, procedures, replacements, and documentation are completed in a correct and timely manner.
The preventive maintenance and surveillance program will be consistent. with NRC requirements.
6-2 April 1985
Nine Mile Point Unit 2 EQD SECTION 7 REFERENCES
- 1. Equipment Qualification Environmental Design Criteria, (EQEDC), Stone Sc Webster Engineering Corporation, Document No. EQEDC-l.
- 2. Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, Paragraph 50.49, Environmental Qualification of Electric Equipment Important to Safety for Nuclear Power Plants. Federal Register, Vol. 48, No. 15. January 21, 1983.
- 3. Regulatory Guide 1.75, Physical Independence of Electric Systems, Revision 2, September 1978.
- 4. Shirley, N.C. et al. General Electric Qualification Program, Licensing Topical Report NEDE-24326-1-P, January 1983.
- 5. General Electric Nuclear Energy Business Group, BWR Quality Assurance Program, NED0-11209-04A, March 1978.
- 6. NUREG-0588, Interim Staff Position on Environmental Qualification of Safety-Related Electrical Equipment.
- 7. IEEE Standard 323-1974, IEEE Standard for Qualifying Class 1E Equipment for Nuclear Power Generating Stations.
- 8. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Standard Review Plan, NUREG-0800.
- 9. 10CFR50, Appendix B.
- 10. 10CFR21.
- 11. Rose, M.; Herrity, J.; Ruolie, N.; and Rasmussen, K.
Design Guidelines for Transient Radiation Effects on Tactical Army Systems. IRT4331-06. June 12, 1981.
- 12. American Institute of Electrical Engineers (AIEE).
Calculation of Absorbed Dose. December 1960.
7-1 April 1985
I
PAGE 9 PROJECT EQUIPHENT SYSTEH EQUIPtlENT QUALIFICATION HASTER LIST NINE HILE - UNIT 2 NIAGARA tlOHAKK EQUIPtlENT ID DESCRIPTION VENDOR NA))E SPEC EQ STAT ZONE ZNIND QUAL REF
%%%If%%%%%))%%%%If))%ÃN))%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%))%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%))%%%%))%%%%%%%%))%%%%%)f ZC))SxSOV23B DRYHELL AIR SAllPLE TARGET ROCK CORP P304X A P C 289681 H P304XAB REHARKS:
ZCHSvSOV23C DRYHELL AIR SA)lPLE TARGET ROCK CORP P304X A PCZ89680 H P304XAC R Et'IARHS ZC)ISxSOV23D DRYHELL AIR SAHPLE TARGET ROCH CORP P304X A PC289680 H P304XAD RE)IARKS:
ZCHSxSOV23E DRYHELL AIR SA)IPLE TARGET ROCK CORP P304X A P C 289681 H P304XAE REHARKS:
ZC))SxSOV23F DRYHELL AIR SA))PLE TARGET ROCK CORP P304X A PC289680 H P304XAF REHARKS-'C))SvSOV24A DHAIR C)PL INBD ISOL TARGET ROCK CORP P304X A PC289681 H P304XAG REHARKS:REG. GUIDE 1.97 ZCHSxSOV248 DHAIR St)PL INBD ISOL TARGET ROCK CORP P304X A PC289681 H P304XAH REHARKS:REG. GUIDE 1.97 ZCHSvSOV24C DH AIR S)IPL OUTBD ISOL TARGET ROCK CORP P304X A SC289155 H P304XAI REtlARKS:REG. GUIDE 1.97 ZCHSxSOV24D DH AIR StlFL OUTBD ISOL TARGET ROCK CORP P304X A SC289155 H P304XAJ REHARKS-REG. GUIDE 1.97 ZCHSsSOV25A SUPP CHllB AIR SA))PLE TARGET ROCK CORP P304X A PC215121 H P304XAK RE))ARKS t ZCHSxSOV258 SUPP CHHB AIR SA))PLE TARGET ROCK CORP P304X A P C215121 H P304XAL RE))ARKS-ZC)ISttSOVZ5C SUPP CHt)B AIR SAHPLE TARGET ROCK CORP P304X A PC215121 H P304XAH RE)!ARKS:
ZCHSsSOV25D SUPP CH))B AIR SAHPLE TARGET ROCH CORP P304X A PC215121 H P304XAN REHARKS-ZCHSxSOV26A SUPP CK))B AIR S)IPL INBD ISO TARGET ROCK CORP P304X A P C215121 H P304XAO RE)lARKS:REG. GUIDE 1.97 ZC)ISxSOV268 SUPP CHHB AIR SHPL IN BD ISO TARGET ROCK CORP P304X A PC215121 H P304XAP RE))ARKS:REG. GUIDE 1.97
PAGE 19 SYS -- CSL REPORT tlO. NttP815 PROJECT EQUXPi'lEtlT SYSTEH REPORT DATK 03/26/85 EQUIPtlKNT QUALIFICATION tlASTER LIST UPDATE DATE 03/25/85 J.O.hO. 1217700 USER SPECIFXED REPORT RESET NO. 015 JOB NAtlE NINE NILE - UNIT 2 SORTEO BY SYS/EQ1 RESET DATE 11/23/8rt JOB CLIENT NIAGARA tlOHAHH S'ELECTEO FOR ZtlXhD IS H EQUIPllENT ID DESCRIPTION VENDOR tlAtlE SPEC EQ STAT ZONK ZNXND QUAL REF f%Ãrr%%%%%
%%Ãiiir%ir%%%%%4(%%%%iilriÃriirViÃkhlf%%%%ir%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%irrr Viii%ri%rr%ii%4firiiVi%%ir%%4fKYiirriiiViKYiXRirKrrrr%%%%%ii%rr%ri%%KKi%%%iiri>%%rr%%ViriliiriVclrl+K 2CSLvAOVX01 ItFSD TESTABLE CHECK VALVE ANCHOR/DARLING P303H A PC306711 H P303HAB REttARHStREG. GUXDK 1.97 2CSLxFVXIR CORE SPRAY PUtlP TEST BYPASS COPES-VUl.CAN C051H A SC175103 H C051t lAA REHARHS:
2CSLwHCV117 RX VSSL HAND COilTROL VLV VELAN P30QE A PC306rll H P30rtEAH R Et lARHS-2CSLiittOVX04 LPCS INJECTION VALVE P30QR A SC289155 H P30QRAU REllARHS:REG. G'JIOE 1.97 2CSLmttOV107 GATE VALVE VELAN P30QR A ABN17503 H P30ttRAV R EllARKS-ZCSLxtlOVX12 LPCS Pl!P SUCT VALVE CLOH CORP P30QY A SC196110 H P30ttYAA REHARKStREG. GUIDE 1.97 ECSLett2 LPCS SYS PRESSURE tlOTOR GOULD PUttPS INC P222X A ABN17503 H P222XAF REllARKS:
PAGE 32 SYS -- HCS REPORT NO. Nl!P815 PROJECT EQUXPtlENT SYSTE!l REPORT DATE 03/26/85 EQUIPHENT QUALIFICATION t!ASTER LIST UPDATE DATE 03/c.5/05 J.O. NO. 1217700 USFR SPECIFIED REPORT RESET tlO. 015 JOB tlAt!E NINE lliLE - UNIT 2 SORTED BY SYS/EQ1 RESET DATE ll/23/84 JCD CLIENT NIAGARA llOHAHK SELECTED FOR ZNitlD IS H EQUIPt!ENT IO DESCRIPTION VENDOR NAtlE SPEC EQ STAT ZONE ZtllhD QUAL REF af Yf Yf YfYf Vi af af Yf YfYfYfYfYfYfYfYfYf Yf YfYf Vi YfYa Yf YfYfYfYfYfYfYfYfYf Yf YfYfYf YfYfYfYf Yf Yfaf ViYf YfYf Yf Va Yf Yf Yf af af Yf Yf af Yf Yf Vc Yf Yf af Yf Yf af af Yfaa af af af? f YfYfYfYf Yf af Yf af YfYf Yf Yf Yf Yf af af Yf Yf Yf Yf YfYC Vc Yf af Yf!fYf Yf Yf Yf YfYfYf YfYf Yf Yf Vc Yf Yf Yf Yf Yf Yf Yf Yf Yf Yf af af af ZHCSYfIPNLZZA HZ RECOl!8 PhR CAB ATONIC XNT. P282K B AEN<<.4033 H P202KAA RE!!ARKS:
ZHCSafIPNLZZB HZ RECO!lBXNER CAB ATOilIC INT. Pc,82K B ABS24036 H P28c.KAB R El!ARKS t ZHCSYftfOVIA RBNR1A OUTLET OUTBO ISOL VELAN P304S A SC215123 H P304SAI REt!ARKSYREG. GUIDE 1.97 ZHCSaftfOVXB RBNR1A OUTLET OUTBD ISOL VELAN P304S A SC215132 H P304SAJ REt'IARKS:REG. GUIDE 1.97 ZHCSaftfOVZA RBNR1A INLET OUTLBD XSOL VELAN P30QS A SCZ15122 H P304SAK RE!!ARKS:REG. GUIDE 1.97 ZHCSYft!OVZB RBNR1A XhLET OUTLBD ISOl VELAN P3045 A SCI.15122 H P304SAL REl!ARKS:REG. GUIDE 1.97 ZHCS~tfOV3A RBNRXA INLET OUTLBD ISOL VELAN P304S A SCZQ0140 H P304SAtl REHARKSYREG. GUIDE 1.97 ZHCSYfttOV3B RBitRIB INLET OUTLBD ISOL VELAN P30QS A SC c240143 H P304SAN REtlARKS:REG. GUIDE 1.97 ZHCSYftfOVQA RBNRlA OUTLET INBD ISOL VELAN P304S A PC215lc.l H P304SAO R Et!ARKS: R EG. GUIDE 1. 97 ZHCSaftiOVQB RBt!RlB OUTLET INBO ISOL VELAN P304S A PC215121 H P30QSAP REt!ARKS:REG. GUIDE 1.97 ZHCSaftfOVSA RBN1A INLET INBD XSOL VELAN P304S A PC215121 H P304SAQ REtlARKS:REG. GUIDE 1.97 ZHCSaftfOV5B RBitlB INLET XNBD ISOL VELAN P304S A PC215121 H P30QSAR REtfARKSYREG. GUIDE 1.97 ZHCSafHOV6A RBNlA INLET XNBO XSOL VELAN P304S A PC250621 H P304SAS REllARKS:REG. GUiDE 1.97 ZHCSlft!OV6B RBN1B XhLET INBD ISOL VELAN P304S A PC250629 H P304SAT REt!ARHS:REG. GUIDE 1.97 ZHCSYfRBNRXA -
HYDROGEN RECO'.lB lA ATO!IIC INT. PZBZK B SC240135 H , PZOc.KAC REtfARKS:Yf
PAGE 39 PROJECT EQUIPHENT SYSTEH EQUIPHENT QUALIFICATION HASTER LIST NINE HILE - UNIT 2 NIAGARA HOHAHK EQUIPIIENT ID DESCRIPTION VENDOR NAKE SPEC EQ STAT ZONE ZNIND QUAL REF 2HVR<<TIS308 GEN AREA EL261 <<UC4128 HCC POHERS C071A A SC175106 H C071ASE RBIARKS'-
ZHVR<<TIS31A UC413A IHLET TEHP HCC POHERS C071A A SC289155 H C071ABF RBIARKS-2HVR<<TIS318 UCR138 INLET TEHP HCC POHERS C071A A SC289155 H C071ASG RBIARKS:
ZHVR<<TIS35A GEN AREA EL261<<UC414A HCC POHERS C071A A SC261145 H C071ASH REHARKS:
ZHVR<<TIS358 GEN AREA EL261<<UC4148 HCC POHERS C071A A SCZ61145 H C071ABI REHARKS-ZHVR<<TIS38A GTS RH A <<UC415A NCC POHERS C071A A SG261355 H C071ABJ RBtARKS:
ZHVR<<TIS388 GTS RN A <<UC4158 HCC POHERS C071A A SG261356 H C071ABK RBIARKS:
ZHVR<<UC401A RHR PUIIP RH A - UNIT CLR AIIERICAN AIR FLT PRlZH 8 ABN17504 H P412HAA REHARKS-2HVR<<UC4018 RHR PUIIP RH C - UNIT CLR AIIERICAN AIR FLT P412H 8 ABS17508 H P412HAB R El IARKS-2HVR<<UC401C RHR PUIIP RH 8 - UNIT CLR AIIERICAN AIR FLT P412H 8 ABS17509 H PRIZNAC REHARKS-ZHVR<<UC401D RHR PUIIP RN A - UNIT CLR ANERICAN AIR FLT P412H 8 ABN17504 H P41ZHAD RBIARKS ZHVR<<UC401E RHR PIMP RN C - UNIT CLR AHERICAN AIR FLT P412H 8 ABS17508 H P412NAE RBIARKS:
ZHVR<<UC401F RHR PUHP RH 8 - UNIT CLR ANERICAN AIR FLT PRlZH 8 ABS17509 H P412HAF RBIARKS 2HVR<<UCROZA LPCS PUIIP RM UNIT CLR ANERICAN AIR FLT P412H 8 ABN17503 H P412NAG REHARKS-ZHVR<<UC40ZS LPCS PUIIP Rfl UNIT CLR AllERICAN AIR FLT P412H 8 ABN17503 H PRIZHAH REHARKS-
PAGE 54 SYS -- RHS REPORT NO. Nt!P815 PROJECT EQJIPtlENT SYSTEt'I REPORT DATE 03/26/85 EQUIP!!ENT QUALIFICATION l!ASTER LIST UPDATE DATE 03/25/85 J.O.NO. 1Z17700 USER SPECIFIED REPORT RESET NO. 015 JOB NAtlE NIt!E t!ILE UNIT 2 - SORTED BY SYS/EQ1 RESET DATE 11/c23/84 JOB CLIEtlT NIAGARA t!OHAHK SELECTED FOR ZNIND IS H EQUIPtlEtlT IO DESCRIPTIOtl VEtiDOR NAtlE SPEC EQ STAT ZOnE ZNItlD QUAL REF
???i???c?i?i?i?c ci?? ii?i?i???i?f?i?i?i?c?f?c????? c?i?c %?c?f?c?i?c???c i?%?i c??i?c???i %???????c???i???i?c 5???i?i I? c?????c?? ic?????c?i%?i?i?i?i?i???c?c?i w?i?c???? K?i?? x?c?i?ice?c?i???i?c???????i?i?i?? %?f?c?c?c?i I?c???? I?i?i %%???i?i???i????????
ZRHSciHCV53B RHS LINE B TO ZllSS-REV1 VELAtl P304E A PC306712 H P304EAC REllARKS:
ZRHS?iHCV53C RHS LINE C TO 2llSS-REVl VELAN P304E A PC306712 H P304EAD REttARKSt ZRHS??HCV54A Zt!SS-REV1 SHUTDKN LINE A VELAN P304E A PCc.61643 H P304EAE RE!'ARKS t ZRHSi?HCV54B Zt!SS-REVl SHUTOHN LINE B VELAN P304E A PC261647 H P304EAF REttARKSt ZRHS??LV17A ZRHS??EIA LEVEL CONTROL COPES-VULCAN C051t! A ABN17505 H C051! lAK REt!ARKS:
ZRHS??LV17B ZRHS??EIB LEVEL CONTROL COPES-VULCAN C051H A ABS17510 H g C051llAL REt!ARKS-ZRHS?it!OVIA RHR DtlP PIA SUCTION CLOH CORP. P304Y A SC175103 H P304YAL REllARKS:REG. GUIDE 1.97 ZRHSict!OVIB RHR DttP PlB SUCTION CLOH CORP. P304Y A SC175111 H P304YAH REt!ARKS:REG. GUIDE 1.97 ZRHSiit!OVIC RHR Pt!P PlC SUCTION CLOH CORP P304Y A SC175111 H P304YAN R EHARKS: BEG. GUIDE 1. 97 ZRHSwt!OV104 RHR HEAD SPRAY ISLN VELAN P304R A SC289155 H P304ROB REt!ARKS:REG. GUIDE 1.97 ZRHSc?ttOV112 RHR SHT ON CLG SUCT ISOL VELAN P304R A PC250624 H P304RDC REttARKS t BEG. GUIDE 1. 97 ZRHS??ttOV113 RHR SHT DN CLG SUCT ISOL VELAN P304R A SCZ40142 H P304RDD REtlARKS:REG. GUIDE 1.97 ZRHS??ttOV115 RHR SERVICE HATER CROSS TIE VELAN P304R A ABS17510 H P304RDE REtlARKS:
ZRHS??ttOV116 RHR SERVICE HTR CROSS TIE VELAN P304R A ABS17510 H P304RDF RE!!ARKS-ZRHS?ct!OVlZA RHR H.E. A SHELL-SIDE OUTLET CLOH CORP P304Y A ABtl17505 H P304YAU REHARKS-
PAGE 60 SYS -- Rlfs REPORT NO. NHP815 PROJECT EQUIPlfKNT SYSTEtl REPORT DATE 03/26/85 EQUIPltENT QUALIFICATION lfASTER LIST UPDATE DATE 03/25/85 J.O.NO. 1217700 USER SPECIFIED REPORT RESET NO. 015 JOB hAllE NINE NILE - UNIT 2 SORTED BY SYS/EQ1 RESET DATE 11/23/8ft JOB CLIEttT ttIAGARA tfOHAKK SELECTEO FOR ZtflhD IS H EQUIPHENT ID DESCRIPTION VENDOR tfAff E SPEC EQ STAT ZONE ZNINO QUAL REF fffc ffffffffff Vf ffffff)f ffffff ffffff)f lf ffffffffffff ff ffff ffffffffffffffffffffffffffff ffffffffffffffffffIfffff)f ffff If ffffffffffff ffffffVi ffffffffffff ffff ff!fffff ff)f % ffffffff ff ff ff ff ffffffffffffffff % ffffffffffff)f ffffff ff ffff)f ffffffff ffffffffff ff% ff ZRtfSffRAYIA REAC BLDG DH H RttG RADN KAlfAN INSTtl P281F 8 SCZ611ff5 H P281FAK REtlARKS-ZRtfSffRAYIB REAC BLDG OH H RNG RADN KAHAN INSTH Pc.81F 8 SC2611ft5 H P281FAL REtlARKS ZRtfSffRAYIC REAC BLDG DH H RNG RAON KAHAN INSTH P281F 8 SC2611ft5 H P281FAH REHARKS:
ZRtfSffRAYIO REAC BLDG OH H RNG RADN KAHAN INSTH P281F 8 SC2611ff5 H P281FAN REtlARKS:
ZRHSffREIA REAC BLDG OH HATCH RADN KAtlAN INSTH PZ81F 8 PC2616ftft H P281FAO REHARKS:REG. GUIDE 1.97 ZRtfSffRE18 REAC BLDG OH HATCH RADN KAltAil INSTtl Pi281F 8 PCI".61609 H P281FAP REHARKS:REG. GUIDE 1.97 ZRtfSffREIC REAC BLDG DH H RNG RADN KAHAN INSTH P281F 8 PCi261638 H P281FAQ R EtfARKS f R EG. GUIDE 1. 97 ZRtfSffREID REAC BLDG DH H RNG RADN KAltAN INSTH P281F 8 PCI.61638 H P281FAR REtfARKS:REG. GUIDE 1 97
PAGE 66 SYS -- SFC REPORT NO. htlP815 PROJECT EQUIP}lsNT SYSTEtl RePORT DATE 03/26/85 EQUIP}lENT QUALIFICATICiN tlASTER LIST UPDATE DATE 03/25/85 J.O.tiO. 1217700 USER SPECIFIED REPORT RESET tiO. 015 JOB NAllE -
NItiE llILE UNIT 2 SORTED BY SYS/EQ1 RESET DATE ll/23/84 JOB CLIENT NIAGARA HOHAliK SELECTED FOR ZNIt;0 IS H EQUIPHEtiT ID DESCRIPTION VENDOR NAE SPEC EQ STAT ZO!iE Zt}IND QUAL REF Yicc%%%%ccKcc%KiccKKÃKYiYicciciccÃkcc%4fKViKKK}fKKXKÃcc%icViKÃicXccX KciYiic%!iicVc%%%)fK%%%%%%%%)fVc%<%%%%%%ic%Vilic%Ãcc%cc%%%%%%%ciciicVicceXKKci)i%%%ccKKViKYiKÃÃVi KX)fkcc%% ZSFCicLS34B SFC SKIll!lER SURGE TK HI LVL l!AG!iETROL C021L A SC328187 H C021LAii REtlARKS: ZSFCxLS55A SF POOL HTR LVL LOH tlAGNETROL C021L A SC353202 H C021LAO RE}}ARKSt ZSFCicLS55B SF POOL HTR LVL LOH HAGNETROL C021L A SC353202 H C021LAP RE}}ARKS: ZSFC>LT32A SF POOL SURGE TANK HATER LVL ROSEt}OUNT C071Hi A SC328197 H C071l'IBQ REHARKS-ZSFCxLT328 SF POOL SURGE TANK HATER LVL ROSEt!OUNT C071}l A SC328187 H C071HBR RellARKS ZSFCcit }1A FUEL POOL CHC t!OTOR GOULD PU}}PS INC. P222X A SC28916c. H P222XAA REt!ARKS ZSFCcct }1B FUEL POOL CHC l!OTOR GOULD PU}}PS IhC. P222X A SC289161 H PZZZXAB REtlARKS-ZSFCxPT3A SF POOL CIRC PP A SUCT PRESS ROSE}!OUNT C071H A SC289162 H C071tlBS R El IARKS: ZSFCciPT38 SF POOL CIRC PP B SUCT PRESS ROSEHOUNT C071}I A SCc.89161 H C07ll!BT REHARKS: ZSFCccPT30A SF POOL CIRC Pt}P DISCH PRESS ROSEtlOUNT C071}l A SC289162 H C071}}BU REHARKS-ZSFCKPT30B SF POOL CIRC PI}P DISCH PRESS ROSENOUiNT C071H A SCc.61145 H C 071}lBV RE}IARKS} ZSFCccTE31A SF POOL SURGE TANK TEHP OUTL PYCO C041D A SC328193 H C041DCQ REHARKS-ZSFC<TE3IB SF POOL SURGE TANK TEt!P OUTL PYCO C041D A SC3 28221 H C041DCR REtlARKS-ZSFCwTE8A SF POOL HT EXCH OUT TE}tP PYCO C041D A SCZ151c.Z H C041DCO REllARKS: ZSFC+TEBB SF POOL HT EXCH OUT TEt!P PYCO C041D A SC215122 H C041DCP REI}ARKS:
PAGE 77 0 SYS -- ZZZ REPORT NO. NttP815 PROJECT EQUIPtlEtlT SYSTEtl REPORT DATE 03/26/85 EQUIPHENT QUALIFICATION tlASTER LIST = UPDATE DATE 03/25/85 J.O.NO. 1217700 USER. SPECIFIED REPORT RESET NO. 015 JOB NAllE NINE tIILE - UHIT 2 SORTED BY SYS/EQ1 RESET DATE ll/23/84 JOB CLIENT HIAGARA llDHAKK SELECTED FOR ZNIND IS H EQUIPtlENT ID DESCRIPTION VENDOR NAllE SPEC EQ STAT ZONE ZNIND QUAL REF }}}}}}}}i}}}}}}}}}}f}f}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}5 }}}}}}}}}}}}}}4}}}f}}}}}}}}}}}}}}i}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}i}}}i}i}i}ii}}i}}f}}}}}i}f}}}}}f}}}}}}}}i}i}}}}}}}i}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}f}}}}}}}}}}}i}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}f}}}}}}}f}}}}}} 2HJtl-46 STR CU CA QD 500KCtl JKT 1/OGhD OKONITE E023C A ALL H E023CAL REllARKS:SEE SCEH SHEET FOR ZONE RESTRICTIONS 2NJtl-47 = STR CU THERH INS OA JKT 2/0 OKOHITE E023C A ALL E023CAR REtlARKS:SEE SCEH SHEET FOR ZONE RESTRICTIONS 2NJH-48 STR CU THERtl INS OA JKT 1/0 OKONITE E023C A ALL E023CAS REttARKS-'SEE SCEH SHEET FOR ZONE RESTRICTIONS ZNJtl-49 STR CU THERtl INS OA JKT 4/0 OKONITE E023C A ALL E023CAQ REHARKS:SEE SCEN SHEET FOR ZONE RESTRICTIONS 2NJH-50 , CU CA THISTED W/OVERALL SHLD ROCKBESTOS CO. E0248 A ALL E024BCA REtlARKS:SEE SCEH SHEET FOR ZOtlE RESTRICTIONS 2NJH-51 CU CA THISTED H/OVERALL SHLD ROCKBESTOS CO. E0248 A E024BCB REt'IARKS:SEE SCEN SHEET FOR ZONE RESTRICTIOiNS 2NJtl-52 CU CA THISTED H/OVERALL SHLD ROCKBESTOS CO. E0248 A ALL E024BCD REtlARKS-SEE SCEN SHEET FOR ZONE RESTRICTIONS 2NJtl-53 CU CA THISTED H/OVERALL SHLD ROCKBESTOS CO. E0248 A E024BCE REtlARKS-SEE SCEH SHEET FOR ZO:lE RESTRICTIONS 2NJN-07 STR CU CA EPR INS H JKT KERITE E024A A ALL E024AAG REtlARKS-SEE SCEW SHEET FOR ZONE RESTRICTIONS c.NJN-08 STR CU CA EPR INS H JKT KERITE E024A A ALL E024AAH REtlARKS:SEE SCEH SHEET FOR ZONE RESTRICTIOtiS 2NJN-09 - STR CU CA EPR INS H JKT KERITE E024A A ALL E024AAI REtlARKS:SEE SCFH SHEET FOR ZONE RESTRICTIONS ZNJN-10 STR CU CA EPR INS H JKT KERITE E024A A E024AAJ REt!ARKS:SEE SCEH SHEET FOR ZOiiE RESTRICTIONS 2NJN-ll STR CU TRX NO 4 GND JKT KERITE E0238 A ALL E023BAA REtlARKS-SEE SCEH SHEET FOR ZONE RESTRICTIONS 2NJN-12 STR CU TRX NO 2 GND JKT KERITE EOc.38 A ALL E0238AB REHARKS:SEE SCEH SHEET FOR ZONE RESTRICTIOtlS 2NJN-13 STR CU TRX NO 2 GND JKT KERITE E04238 A ALl E023BAC REHARKS:SEE SCEH SHEET FOR ZONE RESTRICTIOns
03/22/85 PAGE 2 REVISION: XX NtIP2-ENVIRONtIENTAL QUALIFICATION DATA HASTER LIST (NSSS) ISSUE OATEt XX/XX/XX SORTEO BY HARK NUtlBER HARK NO EQUIPHENT DESCRIPTION REtlARKS ENV. ZONE ENVTYP EQUALST QUAL REF SHEC IO. 822-F013G SAFETY RELIEF VALVE PC289680 HARSH C PBOOAAU ZHSS%PSV132 BZZ>>F013H SAFETY RELIEF VALVE PC289680 HARSH C PBOOAAV 2HSS%PSV127 822-F 013 J SAFETY RELIEF VALVE PC289680 HARSH C PSOOAAH ZtlSS%PSV131 822-F013K SAFETY RELIEF VAVLE PCZS9680 HARSH C PBOOAAX ZHSS%PSVlZ6 822-F013L SAFETY RELIEF VALVE PC289680 , HARSH C PBOOAAY 2HSS%P SV135 822-F013tl SAFETY RELIEF VALVE PC289680 HARSH C PSOOAAZ ZHSS%PSV121 822-F013N SAFETY RELIEF VALVE PCZ89686 HARSH C PBOOABA 2HSS%PSV134 822-F013P SAFETY RELIEF VALVE PC297691 HARSH C PBOOABB ZtlSS%PSV120 822-F013R SAFETY RELIEF VALVE PCZS9680 HARSH C PBOOABC 2tlSS%PSV130 822-F0135 SAFETY RELIEF VALVE PC289680 HARSH C PBOOABD 2HSS%P SV125 822-F013U SAFETY RELIEF VALVE PC289680 HARSH C PBOOABE ZtlSS%P SV129 822-F013V SAFETY RELIEF VALVE PC289680 HARSH C PBOOABF ZIISSKPSV124 822-N044A LEVEL TRANStlITTER RG 1.97 SC215122 HARSH 8 PBOOABG ZISCRLT13A 822-N0448 LEVEL TRANSHITTER RG 1.97 SC215122 HARSH 8 PSOOABH 2ISC%LT138 822-N062A PRESSURE TRANSHITTER RG 1.97 SC261145 HARSH 8 PBOOABI ZISC%PT6A
03/22/85 PAGE 13 REVISION- XX NHP2-KNVZRONHKNTAL QUALIFZCATZON DATA HASTER LIST (NSSS) ISSUE DATE: XX/XX/XX SORTED BY IIARK NUHBER }f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f HARK NO EQUZPHENT DESCRIPTZON REHARKS ENV. ZONE ENVTYP EQUALST QUAL REF SKEC ID. }f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}I}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f}f E12-N0508 PRESSURE TRANSHITTER SC175109 HARSH A PBOOAHH 2RHS}fPT768 K12-N051A PRESSURE TRANSHITTER SC175105 HARSH A PBOOAHX 2RHS}fPT75A E12-N0518 PRESSURE TRANSHITTER SC175109 HARSH A PBOOAHY 2RHS}fPT758 E12-N052A FLOH TRANSHZTTER- SC175105 HARSH 8 PSOOAHZ 2RHS}fFT86A E12-N0528 FLOH TRANSHZTTER SC175109 HARSH 8 PBOOAIA 2RHS}fFT868 K12-N052C FLOH TRANSHITTER SC175109 HARSH 8 PBOOAIB 2RHS}fFT86C K12-N053A PRESSURE TRANSHITTER SC175105 HARSH A PSOOAZC 2RHS}fPT7A E12-N0538 PRESSURK TRANSMITTER SC175109 HARSH A PBOOAID 2RHS}}PT78 E12-N053C PRESSURE TRANSHITTER SC175109 HARSH A PBOOAIE 2RHS}}PT7C E12-N055A PRESSURE TRANSHITTER SC175105 HARSH 8 PBOOAIF 2RHS}fPT5A E12-N0558 PRESSURE TRANSHITTER SC175109 HARSH 8 PSOOAIG 2RHS}fPT58 E12-N055C PRESSURE TRANSHZTTER SC175109 HARSH 8 PSOOAIH 2RHS}fPT5C E12-N056A PRESSURE TRANSHITTKR SC175105 HARSH 8 PBOOAIJ 2RHS}}PT6A E12-N0568 PRESSURE TRANSHITTER SC175109 HARSH 8 PBOOAIK 2RHS}}PT68 E12-N056C PRESSURE TRANSHITTER SC 175109 HARSH 8 PBOOAIL 2RHS}}PT6C
NINE NILE POINT UNIT 2 0 DOCKET NUNBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF (I C001CAB REV 25-Nar-85 ~ a a a aa a aa a a a a a a a ~
~
s
~
s ENVIRONNENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPNENT DESCRIPTION s s s s s s e s DOCUMENT REFERENCE s PARANETER s SPECIFIED s QUALIFIED I I QUAL )NARGINs RENARKS
~ VALUE s VALUE s SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED ~ NETHOD s DENO ~
l EQUIP NO.: 2CNS))PNL66B ~ s s s aa ~
~
a s s
~ ~
aa s s a aa ~ ~ s SPEC NO.: C001C I OP. TINE: ~ 100 DAYS e )100 DAYS s 3 e 2 TEST-SIN ~ YES eSYSTEN: CONTAINMENT 'TENP (F) s s s NOTE 1 s ATMOSPHERE NONITORING NORNAL I 104/88 I 104 s 1 I 2 ~ TEST-SIN I NA NOTE 2 ABNORNALs 88 l 104 ~ 1 I 2 s TEST SIN ~ ~ NA s I TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) ~ ACCIDENT) NA l 150 s 1 I 2 e TEST-S IN s YES ~ NOTE 3 sPRESS(PSIG) I NOTE 1 s IHYDROGEN ANALYZER ~ ~ s ~ NORMAL I .25"W.G. I 29"Hg s 1 e 2 I TEST SIN s NA I s s ABNORNALs ~ 25"W.G. ~ 29"Hg 1
' 2 s TEST SIN ' NA s
INANUFACTURER: CONSIP ACCIDENT s N4 ~ 29" Hg I 1 I 2 TEST SIN e YES NOTE 3 RH (/): s e s s s TEST-SIN s s NOTE 1 sNODEL NO.: K-IV s NORMAL s SO ~ 50 I 1 s 2 s NA s
~ ABNORNALI 50 e 50 s 1 ~ 2 s TEST-SIN s NA s SAFETY FUNCTION: ACCIDENTs NA 90 1 2 s TEST S IM ~ NA s ~ ~ ~
s sNONITOR HYDROGEN AND OXYGEN s RADIATION: l s s NOTE 1
)LEVELS AFTER LOCA s NORM GAMNA~ 1 8E3 ~ s ~ NA s ~ ACC GANNA s 2.2E4 s, 1E7 I 1 I 2 ~ TEST-SIN s YES ~ OP. CODE: A ~ NORM BETA s NA e 1 I NA s
s s ACC BETA s NA 1 s s NA e I NEUTRON s NA s NA I
~ SPR4Y I NA I NA I NA ~ NA e NA s NA s IACCURACY ISUBNERGENCE ~ NA s NA ~ NA s NA NA I NA ~
SPEC: NA s DEMO: NA s s s s s IZONE NO.: ABS24036 s s sSUBNERGENCE: NA ls DOCUNENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1.FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONNENT4L CONDITIONS, ISPRAY: NA ~ 1. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. s s CRITERIA, EQEDC-1, REV 1, NAY 2, 1984. 2.NORNAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS
)EQUIPNENT NOT SUBJECT TO s 2. VENDOR ENVIRONNENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, MAX DESIGN/AVER4GE.
ISUBNERGENCE OR SPRAY SDDF I) IEEE 07. 15S-5000D 3 TENPERATURE AND PRESSURE VALUES
~ SHOWN s
e s 3. EQUIPNENT OPER4BILITY TINE DATA SHEET: ARE LOCA AMBIENT CONDITIONS AT THE s e FILE NO. 33-2-C15 SANPLE PUNP LOCATION; TENPERATURE AND
~ DOCUNENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: PRESSURE VALUES SHOWN ON TEST PROFILES IACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588)CAT e ARE LOCA AMBIENT CONDITIONS AT SANPLE WITHDRAW POINT. ~ ~
s s s
~ ~
s ~ ~
~ ~
NAINT/SURVEILL s s ~
~ ~
s ~ ~
REFERENCE:
2 ~ s ~ s e ~
~ ~
e QUALIFIED LIFE (YEARS): 5
REFERENCE:
2
~ ~
s s e ~ s
~ s ~ s ~ ~
s s
NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF ¹ C001CAA REV 25-Mar-85 s
~ ~
e e ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ~
~ ~ ~
DOCUMENT REFERENCE s s PARAMETER s SPECIFIED l QUALIFIED ~ ~ QUAL l MARGIN l REMARKS e e
~ ~
s VALUE s VALUE s SPECIFIED s QUALIFIED ~ METHOD ~ DEMO I
~ ~ ~ e ~ ~
lEQUIP NO.:
~
2CMS+PNL66A e e
~
e e e e e ~ e e i SPEC NO t C001C l e OP. TIME: s 100 DAYS e )100 DAYS ~ 2 ~ TEST-SI M s YES ~
TEMP (F> e ~ ~
NOTE 1 sSYSTEM: CONTAINMENT e e NORMAL l 104/89 104 2 TEST-S I M NA l NOTE 2 sATMOSPHERE MONITORING s ss a e ABNORMALs 89 s 104 TEST SIM s NA e TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) ACCIDENTs NA 150 2 s TEST-S I M s YES e NOTE 3
- e s s
eHYDROGEN ANALYZER l lPRESS(PSIG> s s
~ e ~
e e e e e NOTE 1
~ l NORMAL s ~ 25 'W G ~ 29'g I e
2 TEST SIM . s NA l ll e e ABNORMALs ~ 25"W. G. l 29"Hg s 2 s TEST SIM e NA l NOTE 3 e IMANUFACTURER: COMSIP ls ACCIDENTs NA s 29"Hg e 2 e TEST SIM l YES s lsRH (/): e e e 2 TEST SIM e NA e NOTE 1 lMODEL NO.: K-IV NORMAL e 50 e s50 e s s ls ABNORMALI 50 ~ 50 s 2 l TEST-8 I M s NA lSAFETY FUNCTION: s s ACCIDENT ~ NA s 90 2 s TEST-8 I M l NA a RADIATION e e NOTE 1 lMONITOR HYDROGEN AND OXYGEN ~ s s s ~ e e el NORM GAMMAe 1.8E3 1 e NA l sLEVELS AFTER LOCA s e e e
~ l ACC GAMMA s 2.2E4 ~ 1E7 1 2 e TEST-SIM s YES NORM BETA l NA 1 e NA s OP. CODE: A e sl ACC BETA I NA ~ ~
1 e NA l I ~ NEUTRON s NA e 1 e s NA s llSPRAY s NA NA s NA NA s NA ~ leSUBMERGENCEe NA NA NA NA NA s NA a sACCURACY e s SPEC'A e e
~ ~ ~
e DEMO: NA ~ e e ~ ~
~ ~ >>ZONE NQ.: ABN24033 e e ~ e sSUBMERGENCEt NA ss DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1.FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, e sSPRAY: NA e s 1. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRQNMENTAL DESIG N SEE THE DOCUMENT TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS REFERENCED'.NORMAL e CRITERIA>> EQEDC-i, REV 1, MAY 2, 1984.
)EQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE.
lSUBMERGENCE QR SPRAY s s SDDF ¹ IEEF 07. 155-5000D 3.TEMPERATURE AND PRESSURE VALUES SHOWN e s s 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TIME DATA SHLET: ARE LOCA AMiBIENT CONDITIONS AT THE FILE NO ~ 33-2-C15 SAMPLE PUMP LOCATION; TEMPERATURE AN>>D PRESSURE VALUES SHOWN QN TEST PROFILESl e DOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: ~ e s e e sACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT I e
~ ~
e ARE LOCA AMBIENT CONDITIONS AT SAMPLE e e
~ ~
e e WITHDRAW POINT.
~ ~
e e ~ e e e e e e e e e e e MAINT/SURVEILL- e e
~ ~
REFERENCE:
2 ~
~ ~
e e ~ ~ QUALIFIED LIFE
~ e ~ e e ~ e (YEARS): 5. ~
e
~ ~
REFERENCE:
2 e
~ ~
e
~ ~
e ~
~ ~ ~ ~
e e
~ e ~ ~
e e
NINE MILE POINT - UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF 8 C021LAA REV 20-Mar-85 ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION
~
s s s DOCUMENT REFERENCE s M l PARAMETER I SPECIFIED s QUALIFIED ~ QUAL s MARGIN e REMARKS s s VALUE VALUE SPECIFIED s QUALIFIED s METHOD e DEMO l sEQUIP NO.: 2DFR+LS34 I'M M s e e
~ ~ ~
e s
~ ~
eSPEC NO.: C021L l OP. TIME: s 6 HRS 180 3 AN + DATA l YES sSYSTEM: REACTOR BUILDINGI l TEMP (F) s s
~ ~
NOTE 1 FLOOR DRAINS 'ORMAL 104/87 110 s 1 2>4 TEST-8IM l NA NOTE 2 SYSTEM 4BNORMALs 104 l 110 s 1 s 2,4 TEST-S IM s NA l TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) ACCIDENTs 175 281 ~ 1 2' TEST-SIM - s YES s LEVEL SWITCH lPRESS(PSIG) s s s s s e ~ ~ s NOTE 1 s s I NORMAL -0.25" WG ATMOS s 1 e TEST-S 1 M s NA s s l -0.25" WG e ATMOS ~ 1 2 TEST-S I M s NA IMANUFACTURERI MAGNETROL ABNORMAL'CCIDENTS 2.8 ~ 18 s 2 TEST-S IM s YES sRH (%): s s s
~ ~
NOTE 1 IMODEL NO.: FLS-MPX-SiMD4 NORMAL 50 s 100 s 1 TEST-.SIM e NA s s ABNORMALs 50 s 100 s 1 s TEST-S I M l NA
~ SAFETY FUNCTION: ACCIDENT l 100 s 100 s TEST-SI M ~ NA l 2RHS+E14 CUBICLE FLOOD ALM s RADIATION: s s s s ~
s
~
NOTE 1 s s NORM GAMMAI 1 ~ 1E6 s 1 l ACC GAMMA I 5. 4E7 2. 2EG 1 TEST-S IM l s lOP. CODE: A s NORM BETA s NA ~ 1 s s ACC BETA 1 ~ 3E7 l'A 1 s s s s l NEUTRON ~ e 1 s s lSPRAY s NA NA lACCURACY sSUBMERGENCE ~ NA NA s l NA s SPEC: N4 DEMO: NA ~
~ ~
s s ~ s s l ZONE NO.: ABN17505 lSUBMERGENCE: NA DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1. FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, s lSPRAY: NA s
~
s s l. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. s s CRITERIA, EQEDC-1, REV 1, 1984. 2.NOR MAL SPECIFIED TEMP ARE SHOWN AS IEQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO s2. l VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. lSUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY s s 3e SDDF I IEEE 07. 124-5000E POST-ACCIDENT OPERABILITY PERIOD: s s
~ s e
FILE NO. 23-6-Cl s DOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: s 4. CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-033 lACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,C4T s
~ ~
s ~ s s s s s MAI NT/SURVE ILL s s s
~
REFERENCE:
NA ~
~ ~ ~
lQUALIFIED LIFE l (YEARS) 11 s
~ ~
s s
REFERENCE:
2,4 ~ s
~
e s s
~ ~ ~ s ~ ~
s ~
~ s ~ e ~ s
NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF ¹ C021LAB REV 14-Mar-85 cta RclRRRs eeccssssec ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION
~ DOCUMENT REFERENCE s s
s s a aa sea sama a s a s PARAMETER ~ SPECIFIED s QUALIFIED l s QUAL IMARGINl REMARKS VALUE s VALUE s SPECIFIED s QUALIFIED l METHOD ~ DEMO l aEQUIP NO.: 2DFR+LS3B s
~ ~ ~
s
~ ~ ~
s s
~ ~
s s
~ s (SPEC NO.: C021L sOP. TIME: l b HRS l 180 s 3 ~ 2 s AN + DATA l YES s eSYSTEM: REACTOR BUILDINGl art ' s s s s s NOTE FLOOR DRAINS NORMAL s 104/89 a 110 s 1 s 2,4 s TEST-SIM l NA NOTE 2 SYSTEM ABNORMALI 107 l . 110 l 1 I 2,4 s TEST-SIM a NA l TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) ACCIDENTs 175 a 281 l 1 l 2 s TEST-S I M ~ YES I LEVEL SWITCH 'PRESS(PSIG) ' NOTE 1 s
NORMAL l -0.25"WG l ATMOS 1 2 I TEST-8 IM I NA s l ION' ABNORMALl -0.25"WG a ATMOS 1 2 e TEST-SIM I NA I IMANUFACTURER: MAGNETROL I ACCIDENT a 2. 8 s 18 l 1 l 2 s TEST-SI M s YES I s ~ a s s s ~ ~ s s NOTE 1 sMODEL NO.: FLS-MPX-S1MD4 NORMAL l 50 100 2 TEST-5 I M
'00 a a 1 s a a NA s a ABNORMAL s 50 a 100 l 1 l 2 s TEST-S IM aNA s s aSAFETY FUNCTION: ~ ACCIDENT I 100 ~ 1 s 2 l TEST SIM ~ NA s 2RHSttEIA CUBICLE FLOOD ALM 'AD P~ I AT I s s NOTE 1 l s
s NORM GAMMA s 1. 1Eb 1 s s l NA s l ACC GAMMA l 5. 1E7 l 2.2E8 l 1 s 2 s TEST-SIM l YES I i l OP. CODE: A NORM BETA a NA 1 I NA s s s ACC BETA s 1 'E7 I 1 s s YES l s I NEUTRON l NA a s 1 e NA I s s lSPRAY l NA l YES s NA s 2 TEST-SIM s NA l s sACCURACY sSUBMERGENCEI NA l NA l NA I NA NA s NA ~ l SPEC: NA s s + + + s a ~ + a ~+ + +as ~~ s + ~ + s DEMO: NA s s a s ZONE NO.: ABS17510 s lSUBMERGENCE: NA DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1.FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, s lSPRAY: NA s 1. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. s CRITERIAt EQEDC 1 t REV 1 t 1984 ~ 2.NORMAL SPECIFIED TEMP ARE SHOWN AS lEQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. sSUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY SDDF ¹ IEEE 07. 124-5000E s l 3. POST-ACCIDENT OPERABILITY PERIOD: FILE NO ~ 23-b-Cl l DOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: l 4~ CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-033 IACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT I~ s s s i s s s s s s s s s l MAINT/SURVEILL s l
REFERENCE:
NA s s s s s QUALIFIED LIFE (YEARS): 11 s s a
REFERENCE:
2t4 ~ s a s s
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
s ~
~ ~
s s
~ ~
NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEN COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF ¹ C021L4C REV 20-Mar-85 e
~
s s ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ~
~ ~
s s DOCUMENT REFERENCE e PARAMETER SPECIFIED ~ QUAL IF I ED ~ s QUAL s M4RGIN s RENARKS
'EMO s ~
VALUE SPECIFIED 'UALIFIED METHOD I EQUIP NO.: 2DFR+LS143 s s s VALUE s ~ s s
. -- ~
s a=--=a--a=-- --+ ---- -~ -- s--
~ ~
s e a e SPEC NO C021L s OP TINiE HRS I 180 e 3 ~ 2 ~ AN DATA ~ YES s sSYSTEN: REACTOR BUILDING 'TENP (F) s NOTE 1 FLOOR DRAINS I NORMAL e 104/85 I 110 I 1 e 2,4 s TEST-SIM e NA NOTE 2 SYSTEM s ABNORMALs 97 I 110 s 1 s 2~4 s TEST-SIM s NA I TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) ACCIDENTI 175 s 281 e 1 I 2 a TEST-SIN s YES ~ LEVEL SWITCH 'PRESS(PSIG) NOTE 1
'2
~ s s I
'ORNAL -0. 25" WG I ATI'IOS I 1 . I 2 I TEST-SIM I NA s
s ABNORMALe -0.2S"WG s ATMOS s 1 s 2 s TEST-SIM s NA IMANUFACTURER: MAGNETROL ACCIDENT, ~ 8 I 18 I 1 ', 2 I TEST-SIM I YES
/5 I as% ~
s
~
s s s NOTE 1 sMODEL NO.: FLS-NPX-81MD4 ~ NORMAL e 50 s 100 s 1 s 2 e TEST-SIN I NA s s I ABt4ORMALI 50 s 100 e I s 2 s TEST-SIN s N4 sSAFETY FUNCTION: e ACCIDENT s 100 I 100 s 1 s 2 s TEST-SIN I NA I RHS B PNP RM FLD WTR LVL ALM. 'ADIATION NOTE 1 s s s NORM GANM4e 8 4ES ~ 1 I NA ~ s s ACC GANNA e 6.SE7 a 2.2E8 s 1 I 2 I TEST-SIM s YES NORN BETA NA ' e OP. CODE: A ~ s 1 s s s ACC BETA s 1.4E7 1 YES s s s s NEUTRON s NA ~ s 1 e s ~ NA e e sSPRAY s NA I YES s NA e 2 s TEST-SIM I NA sACCURACY sSUBNERGENCEs NA I N4 s NA ~ NA s NA s NA SPEC: NA DENO: NA s s e sZONE NO.: ABS17509 s NOTES: FOR CONPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, ISUBMiERGENCE: NA DOCUNENT
REFERENCE:
'.NORMAL s
s
~ SPRAY: NA 1. EQUIPNENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED.
s CRITERIA, EQEDC-I, REV 1, 1984 SPECIFIED TENP ARE SIIOWN AS IEQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT. NAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. sSUBNERGENCE OR SPRAY I SDDF ¹ IEEE 07. 124-SOOOE s s 3. POST-ACCIDENT OPERABILITY PERIOD: s F ILE NO 23-6-C2
~ ~ DOCUNENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: : n. CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-033 IACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT Iss s
s s NAINT/SURVEILL
REFERENCE:
NA IQUALIFIED LIFE (YEARS): 11 REFERENCL: 2,4 ~ ~
~ s ~ ~
s s
~ ~
s ~
~ ~ ~ s
0 NINE NILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUNBER SO-410 SYSTEM CONPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF ¹ C021LAD REV 14-Nar-85 aa R R R as I RKTIRRT es
~ I ENVIRONNENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION I I I EQUIPNENT DESCRIPTION I ~
DQCUNENT REFERENCE I Taaammaaaahs~Ta~~m~~- = ~ he ~ I PARAMETER I SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED s I I QUAL INARGINs REMARKS I I I VALUE s VALUE s SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED ~ NETHOD I DEMO I I FQUIP I"IQ h Sea ~
'Dl as ~ R LS1 TT I ~ I I I I I I I ISPEC NQ.: C021L liIQP.TIME: I 6 HRS I 180 a 3 s 2 I RN + DATA I YES ISYSTEN: REACTOR BUILDINGI TEMP (F) 's I I I I I s NOTE 1 FLOOR DRAINS NORMAL I 104/85 I 110 I 1 s 2,4 I TEST-SIN a NA s NOTE 2 SYSTEM II ABNORNALI 97 I 110 1 s 2a4 I TEST SIN s NA I TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) I RCCIDENT 175 281 1 I 2 I TEST SIN I YES s s s s s ~
I I LEVEL SWITCH I I PRESS (PS IG)
' ' ' I ' s NOTE 1 I I a NORNAL t -0. 2S" WG I ATMOS 1 I
s TEST-S I M I NA I I I I ABNORNAL ~ 0 25" WG
~ ~ ATMOS s 1 I
I TEST-SIN s NA s INANUFRCTURER: NAGNETROL I I RCC IDENT s 2. 8 I 18 a 1 I 2 ~ TEST-SIN I YES I I I I
~
I
~ ~
I
~
I I I NOTE 1 tNODEL NO.: FLS-NPX-SlMD4 s ~ NORN4L I 50 I 100 I 1 2 a TEST-SIN I NA I I ABNORNALI 50 a 100 I 1 I 2 s TEST-SIM ~ NA s I SAFETY FUNCT lON: s I ACCIDENT ss 100 I 100 I 1 I 2 I TEST-SIN I NA s RHS C PNP RN FLD WTR LVL ALN I I RADIATION I ~ I I s ~ ~ NOTE 1 I I ss NORN GRNNAI 3.3ES I 1 a NA I I I ss ACC GAMNA I 5.7E7 I I 2 'E8 1 I TEST SIN ~ YES ~ IOP. CODE: A ss NORM BETA s NA 1 s NA I I I ~ ~ ACC BETA I 1.4E7 1 I YES s I I I>> NEUTRON s NA 1 I NA s I IISPRAY ~ NA I YES I NA I I TEST-SIM I NA ~ IACCURACY IISUBMERGENCEa N4 I NA s NA I NA I NA I NA I SPEC: NA RRQRCTIITDI RR ashT R R X as ZXRRtJLIRITDIT R hT RRRR K R aa CSTI I a C hsCCICCKTIRRTII1CR RRaa I I I DEMO: NA ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
I ZONE NO.: ABS17508 I I I I I I ISUBNERGENCE: NA II DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1.FOR CONPLETE ENVIRONNENT4L CONDITIONS,I ISPRAY: NR e t 1. EQUIPMENT QUALIFIC4TION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUNENT REFERENCED. I I s I CRITERIA, EQEDC-.1, REV 1, 1984. 2.NORMAL SPECIFIED TEMP ARE SHOWN AS IEQUIPNENT NOT SUBJECT TO a I 2. VENDOR ENVIRONNENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, NAX DESIGN/AVERRGE. ISUBNERGENCE OR SPRAY II SDDF ¹ IEEE 07. 124-$ 000E I I 3. POST-ACCIDENT OPERABILITY PERIOD: FILE NO. 23-6-C2 IDOCUNENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: I I 4. CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-033 IACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT IIII ~ I ~ ~ I I I ~
~ I I ~ ~ I ~ ~
s NAINT/SURVEILL I
REFERENCE:
NA ~ I I ~ I ~ s QUALIFIED LIFE I I (YEARS): 11 ~ I
REFERENCE:
2,4 I I I I
~ s ~
I I I ~
~ I I I I I I I
NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF
¹ aaaa a == a aa C021LAE =
REV aaaaa aaa aaaaaaa ==-= a- a a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 14-Mar-85 aa ENVIRONMENTAl CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION I I
~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ DOCUMENT REFERENCE I t I PARAMETER l SPECIFIED t QUALIFIED s ~ QUAL tMARGINs REMARKS I ~ ~
s VALUE ~ VALUE s SPECIFIED ~ QUALIFIED ~ METHOD s DEMO s s EQUIP NO.: 2DFR+LSI 45 ~
~
I
~ ~
I
~ ~ ~
I
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
I
~ ~
t SPEC NO.: C021L t OP. TIME:
~ ~ 6 HRS I 180 s 3 I 2 t AN + DATA l YES ISYSTEM: REACTOR BUILDING'TEMPI I (F) ~ I I ~
I ~ ~ ~ I I NOTE 1 I FLOOR DRAINS ~ ~ NO~' I 104/85 t 1 10 I 1 I 2,4 s TEST-SIM ~ NA l NOTE 2 SYSTEM t l AB.~a.(MALl 86 l 1 10 1 I 2,4 s TEST-SIM l NA s I TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) IDENT 325 281 I l TEST-S I M YES c
---- - -- - 1 ---- ---- - -II s ~ ~ is s LEVEL SWITCH 'PRi=SS(PSIG) ' ' ' ' ' ' NOTE 1 I
I I NORMAL I -0. 25" WG t ATMOS s 1 2 s TEST-S I M I NA I s I ABNORMAL ~ 0 25 "WG I ATMOS s 1 i 2 i TEST SIM ~ NA IMANUFACTURER: MAGNETROL I s ACCIDENT I 3. 8 18 1 I 2 t TEST-SI M YES I I I ('/l I s s I s I I NOTE 1 l MODEL NO.: FLS-MPX-S1MD4 s I NORMAL I 50 l 100 I 1 ~ 2 s TEST SIM ~ NA I I s s ABNORMALI 50 l 100 I 1 l 2 s TEST-SIM I NA tSAFETY FUNCTION: I s ACCIDENT I 100 s 100 I 1 l 2 liTEST-SIM I NA I ICS PMP RM FLOOD WATER 'sRADIATION NOTE 1 I LEVEL ALARM sl NORM GAMMAI 2.4E4 t I 1 I t I NA I OP. il ACC GAMMA l 2E7 I 2 'E8 I 1 I 2 t TEST-SIM t YES I s t CODE: A sl NORM BETA I NA I I 1 s NA I I ls ACC BETA I 1 ~ 3E7 1 t YES I I tt NEUTRON t NA I 1 I t NA t ltSPRAY ~ NA ~ YES s NA t 2 s TEST SIM l NA IACCURACY- ssSUBMERGENCEs SPEC: NA ~ I asiaaa aaa a a NA
--- aa t NA == =
t NA s NA a aa a t
-- NA aaaa s NA a a aa aaaaaaaaaa DEMO: NA ~
I ~ I I ~ I I I I ZONE NO.: SC175106 ~
~ ~ ~
ISUBMERGENCE: NA Is DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1 ~ FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS,l ISPRAY: NA I s 1. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. sl CRITERIA, EQEDC-1, REV 1, 1984. 2.NORMAL SPECIFIED TEMP ARE SHOWN AS l EQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO I I 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT. MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. tSUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY SDDF ¹ IEEE 07. 124-5000E I I I 3. POST-ACCIDENT OPERABILITY PERIOD: I t FILE NO. 23-6-C3 s DOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: I I 4. CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-033 tACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT I ~ I I I I ~
~ ~ ~ I ~ I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
I ILL-
~
l MAI NT/SURVE ~ I I
~
REFERENCE:
NA ~
~ ~
I I ~ I
~ I I QUALIFIED LIFE ~
I I
~
(YEARS): 11 ~ I I
~
REFERENCE:
2,4 ~ I I I I ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
I ~
~ I I I I I
NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER SO-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION NORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF II C021LAF REV 0 14-Mar-85 ~ a a a aa aaaa aa aaaa a aaaa aa a ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION I e s DOCUMENT REFERENCE I I 'Iaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa s s PARAMETER s SPECIFIED e QUALIFIED ~ s QUAL sMRRGINs REMARKS I VALUE VALUE I SPECIFIED QUALIFIED METHOD I DEMO I I s ~ ~
~ anssvm esn ~ ees as seI n e
s aa j~ eees'ct ~
~
s e a ' sa a aaaa a-~ ~
~ =-==== aaaaea aaa a aasaaaaaaeaaaaa aaaaaaaaaa, ~ SPEC NO C021L I OP TIME s I 6 HRS s 180 ~ 3 ~ 2 s AN + DATA s YES I ISYSTEM: REACTOR BUILDING TEMP (F): ~ e s I e e
t I -s NOTE 1 FLOOR DRAINS I ~ NORI1RL I 104/85 s 1 10 s 1 I 2e 4 ~ TEST SIM I NA I NOTE 2 SYSTEM ~ s ABNORMALs 102 I 1 10 s 1 s 2~4 I TEST SIM s NA s TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) I ACCIDENT 175 I 281 I 2 TEST-SIM YES
-- 1 I s s s s e LEVEL SNITCH 'PRESS(PSIG) I I ' ' ' ~ ~
NOTE 1 s I I NORMAL I 0 2S 'NG I ATMOS s TEST-S I M t NA s ~ ABNORMAL s 0 25'G ~ ATMOS ~ 1 ~ 2 ~ TEST SIM s NA s sMANUFRCTURER: MAGNETROL s I ACCIDENTI 2.8 e 18 I 1 I 2 I TEST-SIM I YES s s ~ RH Wl(/)I ~ i ~ s s s NOTE s MODEL NO.: FLS-MPX-S1MD4 s s NORMAL I 50 I 100 s 1 s 2 s TEST-SIM s NA s ABNORMALI 50 I 100 I 1 s 2 s TEST-SIM I NA I SAFETY FUNCTION: I ACCIDENT 100 100 1 I 2 TEST-SI M NA I
- I e s s s s CSH PMP RM FLD WTR LVL ALM ' RADIATION ' ' ' ' ' I I NOTE 1 ~ s NORM GAMMAs 1 ~ BE3 s s 1 ~ I NA s
s I ~ ACC GAMMA s 4. 6E7 I 2. 2EB s 1 I 2 I TEST-S I M s YES I OP. CODE: A ls NORM BETA ~ NA 1 NA ll s s s ACC BETA s 1.3E7 I 1 s I YES s ss NEUTRON e NA 1 s s sISPRAY I NA I YES s NA I 2 I TEST-SIM I NA IACCURRCY- IISUBMERGENCEI NA I NA ~ NA s NA ~ NA s NA I SPECt NR s ~ aa aa a a a aaa aaaa a aaa aa a a aa aa a aa DEMO: NA ~
~ ~ ~
s ~
~ ~
I ZONE NO.: SC175108 ~
~ ~
s ISUBMERGENCE: NA DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1.FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, s ISPRAY: NA ~ 1 EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. s sl CRITERIA~ EQEDC-l, REV 1, I'284. 2.NORMAL SPECIFIED TEMP ARE SHONN AS sEQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO I I 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE-
~ SUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY s s SDDF 8 IEEE 07.124-5000E s
s t 3. POST-ACCIDENT OPERABILITY PERIOD: s FILE NO. 23-6-C3 IDOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: s ~ 4 ~ CALCULATION NO 12177 EQS 033 sRCCEPTABLE TO NUREG OSBB,CAT Isl
~ ~
s s ~
~ s ~ s s ~
s ~
~ s s ~
I MAINT/SURVEILL-
REFERENCE:
NA e ~ s LIFE s s I QUALIFIED ~ s s (YEARS): 11 s s s
REFERENCE:
2,4 ~ s s s s s s s e s s ~
~ ~ ~ ~
s ~ s
-s ~
s
NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUNBER 50-410 SYSTEN CONPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF ¹ aaaaREV C021LAG 14-Nar-85 aaaaaaa aaaaaaa a . Raaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aa a aacaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaacaaaaaaaaaa I
~ ~ ~ ENVIRONNENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION I ~ ~ I DOCUNENT REFERENCE saaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa I PARAMETER I SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED I QUAL I MARGIN I REMARKS VRLUE I VALUE I SPECIFIED s QUALIFIED I NETHOD I DENO I s EQUIP NO.: 2DFR+LS147 aasaaa aaaa I RL R I ~ ~ ~
R ~ I SPEC NO.: C021L IOP.TINE: I 6 HRS I 180 I 3 I 2 I AN + DATA I YES I I SYSTEN: REACTOR BUILDINGI I TENP (F) I NOTE 1 FLOOR DRAINS I NORNAL s 104/85 I 110 s 1 I 2,4 I TEST-SIN I NA NOTE 2 SYSTEM I ABNORMAL s 95 I 110 I 1 I 2,4 ie TEST-SIM I NA I I TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) I RCCIDENT I 175 I 281 I 1 I 2 TESTSIM I YES I LEVEL SWITCH I PRESS (PSIG) I - s I s NOTE 1 I ~ NORNAL si -0. 25" WG I ATMOS I 1 I 2 Ii TEST-SIM I NA I ABNORMALI -0. 25" WG I ATNOS I 1 ~ 2 I TEST-SIN I NA INRNUFACTURER: NAGNETROL ACCIDENT I 2. 8 e 18 I 1 I 2 I TEST-SIN I YES I RH (/1 I (,/1 ~ I I I I NOTE 1 I NODEL NO.: FLS-NPX-S1MD4 I NORMAL I 50 I 100 I 1 I 2 I TEST SIN ~ NA I I ABNORMALI 50 I 100 I 1 I 2 I TEST SIN I NA I SAFETY FUNCTION: ACCIDENT I 100 I 100 s 1 I 2 s TEST-SIM I NA I I CSL PMP RN FLD WTR LVL ALM 'RADIATION I I NOTE 1 I I NORM GANNAI 2.6E5 I I 1 I I I NA I ACC GAMNA ~ 6 ~ 2E7 s 2 2EG ~ I ~ 2 ~ TEST SIN ~ YES I OP. CODE: R s NORM BETA I NA 1 I I s ACC BETA I 1.4E7 s 1 ~ I YES I I NEUTRON I NA I 1 I I NA I ISPRAY I NA I YES I NA I 2 I TEST-SIN I NA I 'sACCURRCY ISUBNERGENCEI NA I NA s NA si NA s NA I NA I SPEC: NA ca L Raaa a La a Rcaccaaccacca RaccaRR Rcc c aca RLRR a aaaaa I DEMO: NA I I I I IZONE NO.: ABN17503 I ISUBNERGENCE: NA s DOCUNENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1.FOR CONPLETE ENVIRONNENTAL CONDITIONS, I ISPRAY: I NA I l. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONNENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUNENT REFERENCED. I CRITERIA, EQEDC-1 s REV 1, 1984. 2.NORMAL SPECIFIED TENP ARE SHOWN AS IEGUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, NAX DESIGN/AVERAGE ISUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY SDDF ¹ IEEE 07. 124-5000E I I 3. POST-ACCIDENT OPERABILITY PERIOD: I I F ILE NO. 23-6-C3 s DOCUNENTAT ION ACCEPTABILITY I 4. CALCULATION NO. 12177-EGS-033 IRCCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT I III I I I NAINT/SURVEILL
REFERENCE:
NA I QUALIFIED LIFE (YEARS): li s
REFERENCE:
2,4
~ ~
I I
~ ~
I ~
NINE NILE POINT - UNIT 2 DOCKET NUNBER 50-410 SYSTEM CONPONENT EV4LUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1
¹ C021L4H 14-Mar-85 a>> c --ccaaaaccaaaaacaaacacaaaa QUAL REF acr REV aacacaa =-- =-====-= -- aaaaacaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaca caaaaaaaaa ~ ~ ~ ~
s ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION s s s s s s s s
~ ~ DOCUMENT REFERENCE acccaacaaar aaaaaaacaaaaaa s PARAMETER a SPECIFIED t QUALIFIED s l QUAL aNARGINs REMARKS I SPECIFIED QUALIFIED l EQUIP NO.: 2DFR+LS148 t VALUE s ------'a- --a-D-V4LUE l s Saa aaaca-as aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaatraaaaaaaaaaar NETHOD s DEMO I casa I
~ SPEC aSYSTEN: NO.: C021L FLOOR DRAINS a l OP TINE' REACTOR BUILDING aTEMP (F): l NORNAL s s 6 HRS 104/85 s t i 180 1 10 s s 1
~
t s 2 2a4
~
I
~
AN + DATA TEST SIM I s a
---a YES NA t - NOTE 1 NOTE 2 SYSTEM ABNORNALi 99 I 1 10 l 1 ~ 2a4 ~ TEST SIN ~ NA l t TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) s ACCIDENT s 175 t 281 a 1 a 2 ~ TEST-SIN s YES s I LEVEL SWITCH ~ PRESS (PSIG) s s ~ ~ ~ i ~ NOTE 1 s NORNAL s -0. 25" WG s ATMOS l 1 t 2 t TEST-SIN s NA ~
t t ABNORNALl -0. 25" WG I ATNOS s 1 s 2 t TEST-S IM s NA s aMANUFACTURER: NAGNETROL ACCIDENT s 2. 8 18 1 2 TEST-SIN l YES
-I s s s a IRH (%): l NOTE 1 tNODEL NO.: FLS-MPX-S1ND4 I NORNAL s 50 a 100 a 1 s 2 t TEST-SIM s NA t si ABNORMALs 50 ~ 100 s 1 s 2 t TEST-SIN I NA t s
aSAFETY FUNCTION: ACCIDENT I 100 s 100 s 1 s 2 ~ TEST-SIM s NA RHS A PNP RM FLD WTR LVL ALN t RADIATION t s t a s s ~ NOTE 1 i NORM GANMAs 8 4E5 ~ 1 l t NA I s s s ACC GANMA a 8. 9E7 s 2. 2E8 l 1 t 2 l TEST-SIN I YES s lOP. CODE: A s NORN BETA s NA s 1 s NA s s t ACC BETA s 1.4E7 s s 1 s I a YES s I NEUTRON s NA e 1 t NA I s sSPRAY s NA a YES t NA t 2 l TEST-S I M t N4 l s IACCURACY sSUBMERGENCEs NA I NA a NA ~ NA t NA l NA s s SPEC: NA ~ a acciaaa a araa ae a a a ac aaacaaac aacacaaacacac DENO: NA s s s s s s s s ZONE NO.: ABN17504 s s s sSUBNERGENCE: NA s DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1.FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONNENTAL CONDITIONS, t tSPR4Y: NA s 1 ~ EGUIPNENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONNENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. s s CRITERIA, EQEDC-1, REV 1, 1984. 2.NORNAL SPECIFIED TEMP ARE SHOWN AS tEQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO I 2. VENDOR ENVIRONNENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, NAX DESIGN/AVERAGE
~ SUBNERGENCE OR SPR4Y si SDDF ¹ I EEE 07. 124-5000E s
- 3. POST-ACCIDENT OPERABILITY PERIOD:
s s FILE NO. 23-6-C4 l DOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: l 4. CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-033 sACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT s Itl s s s
~ NA I NT/ SURVE ILL s
REFERENCE:
NA s QUALIFIED LIFE (YEARS): 11 s
REFERENCE:
2,4 s ~
~ s ~ s ~ ~
s
"D NINE M POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF ¹ C021LAI REV 20-Mar-85
~ ~
a a ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION a a
~ ~ ~ DOCUMENT REFERENCE s a
PARAMETER SPECI'FIED a QUALIFIED s QUAL a MARGIN s REMARKS a s a s VALUE s VALUE a SPECIFIED a QUALIFIED 'ETHOD ~
~
DEMO
~ ~ a EQUIP NO.: 2SFC+LS33A a a ~
a a ~ a sOP. TIME: l 100 DAYS 180 3 2 AN + DATA YES lSPEC NO.: sSYSTEM: C021L REACTOR BUILDINGs tTEMP (F) l a l s a a s
--a NOTE 1 FLOOR DRAINS NORMAL l 104/c)8 l 110 l 1 l 2,4 l TEST-SIM l NA NOTE 2 SYSTEM ABNORMALs 197 l 197 s 1 s 2,4 l AN + DATA a NA l TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) ACCIDENTl 175 s 281 t 1 l 2 s TEST-SIM l YES t LEVEL SMITCH 'PRESS(PSIG) NOTE 1 a 'ORMAL ~ -0. 25" WG a ATMOS l 1 a 2 s TEST-SI M l NA s a
ABNORMALl -0.25"WG l ATMOS 1 s 2 l TEST-SIt1 s NA tMANUFACTURER: MAGNETROL s ACCIDENT s 2. 8 a 18 t 1 a 2 s TEST-SIM s YES
~ RHa (/) a a a a
a a a a a NOTE 1 s MODEL NO.: 291-MP-SIMD4 s NORMAL a 50 a 100 s 1 ~ 2 ~ TESTSIM s NA a a s ABNORMALs 50 s 100 t 1 s 2 a TEST-SIM s NA <<SAFETY FUNCTION: ACCIDENT s 100 l 100 s 1 l 2 a TEST-SI M t NA SKIMMER SURGE TANK LVL ALM (RADIATION: a
', ' ~ ~ a NOTE 1 NORM GAMMAl 2.2Eb 1 NA a
s ACC GAMMA a 2. SENT a 2. 2ES s I s 2 l TEST-SI M s YES sOP. CODE: A a NORM BETA ~ NA" 1 s s NA a a s ACC BETA s 1 ~ 3E7 s 1 a YES a NEUTRON a NA s a 1 a s NA
~ SPRAY NA a YES a NA s 2 s TEST-SIM l NA s
~ ACCURACY ~ SUBMERGENCEs NA NA s NA s NA s NA ~ NA SPEC: +/-0.25" MG a DEMO: +/-0 25" WG a sEONE NO.: SC328193 a aSUBMERGENCE: NA DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1.FGR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, s aSPRAY: NA a 1. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONt'1ENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. a a CRITERIA, EQEDC-1, REV 1, 1984. 2.NORMAL SPECIFIED TEMP ARE SHOWN AS sEQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO s 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE.
~ SUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY SDDF ¹ IEEE 07. 124-5000E 3.LEVEL SMITCH IS QUALIFIED FGR a 3. POST-ACCIDENT OPERABILITY PERIOD: 11 YEARS AT 110F AND DURING LOCA FOR FILE NO. 34-2-C5 281F THEREFORE, ABNORMAL TEMP OF 197F l l DOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: ~ 4. CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-033 WILL NOT HAVE ANY DETRIMENTAL EFFECT lACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT ON THC SMITCH. a ~ ~ ~ ~
a ~ ~ a a ~
~ ~ ~ a ~ ~
a a l MA I NT/SURVE ILL ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
REFERENCE:
NA ~ a a ~ ~ sQUALIFIED LIFE a ~ a
~ ~ ~ a (YEARS)."11 ~ ~
a
~
REFERENCE:
2,4 ~
~ ~
a a a a ~ a ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a a
a
NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF ¹ C021LAJ REV 20-Mar-85 ENV1RONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION
~
s s s DOCUMENT REFERENCE
.'$ SPECIFIED QUALIFIED sMARGINl s
s PARAMETER ~ s ~ QUAL VALUE l VALUE I SPECIFIED l QUALIFIED I METHOD I DEMO IEQUIP NO ~ FC+LS33B ~ s
~
s
~
s
~
s
~
s
~
s
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
sSPEC NO.: C021L s OP TIME s 100 DAYS ~ 180 I 3 s 2 s AN ~ DATA ~ YES s ISYSTEM: REACTOR BUILDINGs s TEMP (F) NOTE 1 FLOOR DRAINS SYSTEM TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) NORMAL ABNORMALl ACCIDENTS s 104/89 133 175 s l 110 133 281 s l 1 1 s l 2,4 2,4 2
'N s TEST-SIM + DATA l NA TEST-SIM ~ NA YES NOTE 2 -- 1 e s s s s s ~ LEVEL SWITCH sPRESS(PSIG) ' s ~
NOTE 1 s s I NORMAL I -O. 25 "WG s ATMOS ~ 1 2 s TESTSIM s NA s s ABNORMAL ~ -O. 25" WG t ATMOS s 1 ~ 2 s TEST-Sit1 s NA IMANUFACTURERt MAGNETROL ~ ACCIDENTs 2 8 18 1 2 TEST SIM YES ('/l
~ ~ ~ s ~
s W ('/) RH C'/5 s s s s s s s NOTE 1 I MODEL NO.: 291-MP-81MD4 s NORMAL ~ 50 I 100 s 1 ~ 2 ~ TEST SIM s NA s s s ABNORMALa 50 s 100 s 1 l 2 s TEST-SIM I NA s sSAFETY FUNCTION: s ACCIDENTs 100 s 100 s 1 l 2 ~ TEST-SIM l NA a SKINNER SURGE TANK LVL ALM s RADIATION: t s I s NOTE 1 s NORM GAMMAs 1.8E3 s 1 a NA a s s ~ ACC GAMMA s 2 'E6 1 2 s TEST-5l tl a YES a I OP. CODE: A s NORM BETA s 'NA 1 s NA s s s ~ ACC BETA s 1.3E7 s 1 a YES s a NEUTRON I NA s 1 a NA s s s sSPRAY NA s NA e 2 a TEST-S I M a NA ~ aACCURACY eSUBMERGENCEs NA s s NA e NA a NA a NA SPEC: w/-0.25 s s DEMO: +/-0.25 s s s sZONE NO.: SC328187 s aSUBMERGENCE: NA DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1.FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS,l
'.NORMiAL s
sSPRAY: NA a 1. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED s s s CRITERIAs EQEDC-la REV la 1984 SPECIFIED TEMP ARE SHOWN AS aEQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO a 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. aSUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY s SDDF ¹ IEEE 07. 124-5000E 3.LEVEL SWITCH IS QUALIFIED FOR s a 3. POST-ACCIDENT OPERABILITY PERIOD: 11 YEARS AT 110F AND DURING LOCA FOR FILE NO. 34-2-C5 281F: THEREFORE, ABNORMAL TEMP OF 133F s IDOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: s 4 ~ CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-033 WILL NOT HAVE ANY DETRIMENTAL EFFECT sACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT Is s ON TI.IE SWITCH. s s I MA INT/SURVE ILL s s
~ ~
REFERENCE:
NA ~
~ ~
s
~ s ~ s a QUALIFIED LIFE ~ ~
s
~
(YEARS): 11 ~
~
s s
REFERENCE:
2~4 s s
~
s
~ ~
s ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s ~ ~ ~ s
0 NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF ¹ C021LAK REV 20-Mar-85
~ ~
s
~ ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ~ ~ ~ ~
s DOCUMENT REFERENCE PARAMETER SPECIF IED s QUALIFIED a QUAL MARGIN REMARKS VALUE VALUE l SPECIFIED s QUALIFIED s METHOD DEMO lEQUIP NO.: 2SFC+LS33C ~
~ ~
s s s s e--ma-==ax==--===a (SPEC NO.: C021L tOP. TIME: 100 DAYS 180 AN ~ DATA s YES REACTOR BUILDINGs aTEMP (F>: NOTE s lSYSTEM: s s s s FLOOR DRAINS ~ NORMAL ~ 104/98 110 2,4 TEST-SIM NA NOTE 2 s SYSTEM e ABNORMALs 197 l 197 2,4 AN ~ DATA s NA s TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) s ACCIDENTs 175 281 2 TEST-SIM YES s LEVEL SWITCH ~ PRESS <PSIG) a s s s s s NOTE 1 NORMAL -0.25"WG I ATMOS 2 TEST-SIM NA l s s ABNORMALs -0.25"WG I ATMOS 2 TEST-SIM NA eMANUFACTURER: MAGNETROL s ACCIDENTs 2.8 18 2 TEST-SIM YES s s eRH </): ~ s s NOTE 1
~ MODEL NO.: 291-MP-S1MD4 l NORMAL s 50 I 100 TEST-SIM a NA e s ~ ABNORMALs 50 100 TEST-SIM NA s (SAFETY FUNCTION: ACCIDENT a 100 100 TEST-SIM NA s I SKINNER SURGE TANK LVL ALM s RADIATION: s s s s NOTE 1 e NORM GAMMAs 2 2E6 ~ 1 NA ~ ACC GAMMA s 2. 6Eb 2. 2E8 1 TEST-SI M YES sOP. CODE: A NORM BETA s NA 1 NA s ACC BETA 1. 3E7 1 YES s
s s NEUTRON NA 1 NA s s sSPRAY NA YES NA TEST-S IM NA eACCURACY sSUBI'1ERGENCEt NA NA NA NA NA NA SPEC: +/-0.25 ~ s
' ' ' ' "' ~
s DEMO: +/-0.25 s s
~
s s ~ s s ~ sZONE NOs ( SC328193 ~ s
~ ~
eSUBMERGENCE: NA ~
~ ~ ~ DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1.FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, sSPRAY: NA s
~ ~ ~ 1. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED.
s
~
s
~
s CRITERIA, EQEDC-1, REV 1 ~ 1984. 2.NORMAL SPECIFIED TEMP ARE SHOWN AS lEQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO ~ ~
- 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT~ MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE.
If s s sSUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY ~
~
s s SDDF ¹ EE 07. 124-5000E 3.LEVEL SWITCH IS QUALIFIED FOR s
~
s
~
s 3. POST-ACCIDENT OPERABILITY PERIOD: 11 YEARS AT 110F AND DURING LOCA FOR
~
s
~ ~ FILE NO. 34-2-C5 281F; THEREFORE, ABNORMAL TEMP OF 197F e DOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: ~
s
~ ~ CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-033 WILL NOT HAVE ANY DETRIMENTAL EFFECT lACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT s ~
ON THE SWITCH.
~ s ~ ~
s s ~ s ~ ~ s s
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s l MAINT/SURVEILL . s s ~ ~
REFERENCE:
NA s s
~
s s s tQUALIFIED LIFE (YEARS>! 11 s s
~ ~
REFERENCE:
2,4 a
~ ~
s s
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
s s s ~ s ~
~ ~
s s
NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF ¹ C021LAL REV 20-Mar-85
~ ~
s s ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ~
~ ~
s e s s DOCUMENT REFERENCE e a PARAMETER ~ SPECIFIED e QUAL IF I ED QUAL sMARGIN ~ REMARKS VALUE e VALUE s SPECIFIED l QUALIFIED s METHOD I DEMO s
~ ~
sEQUIP NO.:
~ e 2SFC+LS33D ~
s
~
s
~
s
~ s s s s ~ ~
sSPEC NO.: C021L l OP. TIME: l 100 DAYS l 180 l 3 l 2 l AN ~ DATA l YES s sSYSTEM: REACTOR BUILDINGs s s s s
~
s MflTC OT 1 ~ FLOOR DRAINS s NORMAL ~ 104/89 ~ 1 10 ~ 1 ~ 2~4 s TEST SIM s NA s NOTE 2 SYSTEM s ABNORMALs 133 t 133 s 1 s 2,4 e AN + DATA l NA s s TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) ACCIDENTs 175 s 281 s 1 ~ 2 t TEST-S I M e YES s LEVEL SWITCH s PRESS (PSIG) l e ~ ~ s l NOTE 1 s s NORMAL ~ -0.25"WG e ATMOS s 1 s 2 s TEST-SIM ~ NA l ABNORMALt -0.25"WG s ATMOS s 1 ~ 2 s TEST-SIM t NA l 2 TEST-S I M sMANUFACTURER: MAGNETROL s s ACCIDENT l RH (%): ~ 2 8 e 18 s 1 s s s YES s NOTE 1 ~ MODEL NO.: 291-MP-S1MD4 NORMAL l 50 ~ 100 s 1 s 2 e TEST-SIM t NA ABNORMALs 50 l 100 s 1 t 2 s TEST-SIM s NA s SAFETY FUNCTION: ACCIDENT t 100 l 100 2 TEST-SI M NA s s SKINNER SURGE TANK LVL ALM t RADIATION: s a 1
- - l s s s
s s s s
-l NOTE 1 ~ NORM GAMMAt 1 BE3 s 1 s s NA s e
s s ACC GAMMA s 2.6E6 e 2.2E8 1 2 s TEST-SIt4 e YES s lOP. CODE: A s NORM BETA e NA s s 1 s l NA s s s s ACC BETA s 1.3E7 e 1 l YES s s s s NEUTRON ~ NA s s 1 s NA s sSPRAY NA l YES NA 2 s TEST-SIM s NA s s s e ~ lACCURACY sSUBMERGENCEt NA s NA s, NA l NA l NA s NA SPEC: +/-0.25 ~ s e DEMO: +/-0.25 e s e e s s s sZONE NO.: SC328187 s lSUBMERGENCE: NA DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES! 1.FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, s ~ SPRAY: NA s 1. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT EQEDC-i, REV 1, 1984. 2.NORMAL SPECIFIED TEMP ARE SHOWN AS REFERENCED'RITERIA, s lEQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO s2.. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, s MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. sSUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY e SDDF ¹ IEEE 07. 124-5000E 3.LEVEL SWITCH IS QUALIFIED FOR s 3. POST-ACCIDENT OPERABILITY PERIOD: 11 YEARS AT 110F AND DURING LOCA FOR s FILE NO. 34-2-C5 281F; THEREFORE, ABNORMAL TEMP OF 133Fs s DOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY! s 4 ~ CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-033 WILL NOT HAVE ANY DETRIMENTAL EFFECT .s ~ ACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT ON THE SWITCH. s e s s s s s s
~ ~
MAINT/SURVEILL
~ s s s e s s
REFERENCE:
NA ~
~
s
~
s ~ s s l QUALIFIED LIFE ~
~ ~ ~
(YEARS): 1 1
~ ~
s s
REFERENCE:
2,4 ~
~
s
~ ~ ~
s s s ~
~ s ~ ~
s s
~ ~ ~ s
NINE NILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM CONPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF ¹ C021LAN REV 0 20-Nar-85 ENVIRONNENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION DOCUMENT REFERENCE s =
== == === = = ~ P4RANETER ~ SPECIFIED ~ QUALIFIED e
I I s QUAL s NARGIN I REMARKS V4LUE e VALUE s SPECIFIED e QUALIFIED s METHOD I DEMO e nc cr asLS34A 2SFC c massa ~
~ ~
e
~ ~
a
~ ~ ~ s s e
s e s SPEC NO.: C021L s I OP. TINEz ~ NA e 180 I 3 s 2 I AN ~ D4TA I YES sSYSTEN: REACTOR BUILDING TEMP (F) s ~ ~ s ~ s ~ ~ NOTE 1 FLOOR DRAINS ~ ~ NORNAL ~ 104/98 ~ 1 10 s 1 s 2~4 I TEST SIN s NA I NOTE 2 SYSTEM ABNORNAL>> 197 s 197 s 1 I 2,4 e AN + DATA s NA I TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) ACCIDENTs 175 281 1 2 I TEST-SIN I YES a LEVEL SWITCH e IPRESS(PSIG) I ' s
- - s e
s
- ' - ' ' NOTE 1 e
Is NORNAL s -0.25"WG s ATNOS ~ 1 s TEST-SIN s NA s e ABNORMAL s -O. 25 "WG s ATMOS s 1 s 2 I TEST-SIN s NA INANUFACTURER: NAGNETROL ~ s ACCIDENTs 2 8 I 18 e 1 e 2 ~ TEST SIN s YES ~ s IRH (%): s
-e NOTE 1 e MODEL NO.: 291-MP-S1ND4 II NORMAL s S0 ~ 100 1 2 e TEST-S IM s NA s s I ABNORNALe 50 s 100 l 1 a 2 s TEST-SIM s NA ISAFETY FUNCTION: s s ACCIDENT s 100 s 100 ~ 1 s 2 e TEST-SI M s NA s SFC SKIMNER SURGE TNK LVL s s RADIATION I I a s ~ s ~ NOTE 1
~ ALN sl NORN GANMAs 2 2E6 s e 1 e e NA s e e I s ACC GANNA s 2. 6Eb I 2.2E8 e 1 s 2 e TEST-SIM s YES ~ I OP. CODE: B es NORM BETA s NA s 1 e NA e e es ACC BETA s 1.3E7 1 sa NEUTRON I NA 1 e
'NA e
IISPR4Y I NA I YES NA 2 TFST-SIM NA e s ~ s s sACCURACY SUBMERGENCE s NA NA e NA e NA ~ NA ~ NA SPEC: +/-0.25 e e e
~
DENO +/-0 ~5 ~ e
~
e e e ~ e ~ eZONE NO.: SC328193 ~ e e e ISUBNERGENCE: NA DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES ' ~ FOR CONPLE'I E ENV IRONNENTAL COND I T I ONS e s sSPRAY: NA s a 1. EQUIPNENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUNENT REFERENCED. CRITERIA, EQEDC-1, REV 1, 1984. 2.NORMAL SPECIFIED TENP ARE SHOWN AS IEQUIPNENT NOT SUBJECT TO 2. VENDOR ENVIRONNENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, NAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. eSUBNERGENCE OR SPRAY SDDF ¹ IEEE 07 ~ 124-5000E 3.LEVEL SWITCH IS QUALIFIED FOR
~ I 3. POST-ACCIDENT OPERABILITY PERIOD: 11 YEARS AT 110F AND DURING LOCA FOR FILE NO. 34-2-CS 281Fc THEREFORE ABNORMAL TENP OF 197F I DOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: ~ s 4 ~ CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-033 WILL NOT HAVE ANY DETRIMENTAL EFFECT aACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT e
I'
~ ~
ON THE SWITCH.
~ ~
e ~ e ~ e e e e e e ~
~ ~
~ NA INT/SURVE ILL s
REFERENCE:
NA
~ e QUALIFIED LIFE e e s
(YEARS): 1 1 s
REFERENCE:
2,4 ~ e
~
e ~ e ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e
NINE NILE POINT UNIT 2 I DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF ¹ C021LRN REV 20-Nar-85 a aa a a a ENVIRONNENTAL CONDITIONS 4ND QURLIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION DOCUNENT REFERENCE I PARANETER I SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED s QUAL sNARGINI REMARKS VALUE : VALUE : SPECIFIED ; QUALIFIED : METHOD : DEMO : I I I I ~ ~ IEQUIP NO.: 2SFC+LS34B I I I I ' I I I ~ I ISPEC NO.: C021L sOP ~ TIME: s NA I 180 s 3 ~ 2 s AN + DATA I YES ISYSTEN: REACTOR BUILDINGs TENP (F) ' s s ~ ~ NOTE 1 FLOOR DR4INS s NORMAL s 104/89 s 110 I 1 s 2,4 I TEST-SIM s NA s NOTE 2 SYSTEM ABNORNALI 133 I 133 s 1 s 2,4 s AN + DATA s NA I TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) ACCIDENTs 175 I 281 I 1 I 2 s TEST-SIM I YES
-s NOTE s
s LEVEL SWITCH IPRESS(PSIG)s s I s s
- ~ 1 s -0.25"WG ' 2 TEST-SIM I NA I NORNAL s I ATMOS s I s .
I I ABNORNAL ~ 0 25 WG ~ ATMOS ~ 1 ~ 2 ~ TEST SIN ~ NA INANUFACTURER: NRCNETROL I ACCIDENTs 2.8 s 18 s 1 s 2 ~ TEST-SIN ~ YES I IRKED IP (t( Jl J)) ~~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ NOTE 1 INODEL NO.: 291-MP-SIND4 ~ NORMAL 50 I 100 ~ 1 I 2 s TEST SIN ~ NA I I s 4BNORNAL I 50 ~ 100 I 1 I 2 I TEST-SIN I NA ISAFETY FUNCTION: ACCIDENTI 100 I 100 I 1 I 2 I TEST-SIN I NA I I I I sOP. ALM CODE: B I I RADIATION s ii NORN GANNRI ACC GANNA NORM BETA I I ACC BETA i s s 1 ~ NA 8E3
- 2. 6E6
- 1. 3E7 i'.
~
I e s 2E8
~
s 1 1 1 1
~
I 2
~
s TEST-S IN s I I s YES NA YES
~
e s NOTE 1 I I s NEUTRON I NA I 1 s NA s I .~ sSPRAY s NA s YES I NA a 2 s TEST-SIN s NA IACCURACY s SUBNERGENCE ~ NA s NA ~ NA ~ NA NA s NA SPEC: +/-0.25 I I DEMO: +/-0.25 I s ZONE NO.: SC328187
~ SUBMERGENCE NA I DOCUNENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1. FOR CONPLETE ENVIRONNENT4L CONDITIONS~ ISPR4Y: NA 1. EQUIPMENT QUALIFIC4TION ENVIRONNENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUNENT REFERENCED. I I CRITERIA, EQEDC-1, REV 1, 1984 ~ 2.NORMAL SPECIFIED TENP ARE SHOWN AS IEQUIPNENT NOT SUBJECT TO 2. VENDOR ENVIRONNENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, NAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. ISUBNERGENCE OR SPRAY ~ SDDF ¹ IEEE 07. 124-5000E 3.LEVEL SWITCH IS QUALIFIED FOR
- 3. POST-ACCIDENT OPERABILITY PERIOD: 11 YERRS AT 110F AND DURING LOCA FOR a FILE NO. 34-2-C4 281F; THEREFORE, ABNORNAL TEMP OF 133F I DOCUNENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: ~ 4 ~ C4LCULATI ON NO. 12177-EQS-033 WILL NOT HAVE ANY DETRIMENTAL EFFECT sACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT ON THE SWITCH.
I ~ I I I
~ ~
I ~ ~ I NAINT/SURVE ILL
REFERENCE:
NA I I I I ~ I IQUALIFIED LIFE (YEARS): 1 1 ~ I ~
~
REFERENCE:
2,4 I I
~
I I
~ ~ ~
I ~
~ I ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~
I ~
'l NINE NILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER SO-410 SYSTEM CONPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE OF 1 QUAL REF ¹ C021LAO REV 0 14-Nar-85 a rara = rr rra r ----==--ar aa ara- a = a aa a- aar aaarrarrraraaaaa aaa aaaarr a aaaaaaaaaaaraaaaa aaaaraarra I
~ ~ I ENVIRONNENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ~ I I I
~ aa -ar DDDDDDD I PARANETER I I SPECIFIED
~ ~ QUALIFIED I DOCUNENT REFERENCE I QUAL I MARGIN REMARKS VALUE I VALUE I SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED METHOD ~ DEMO IEQUIP NO.: 2SFC+LSSSA 'aaaaaaaaaaa'ararrr aara aaaaaaaaara'arraarra ~ = ~ rara laar aaaaraaaaI ISPEC NO.: C021L IOP.TIME: s NA I 180 I 3 I 2 I AN + DATA I YES I ISYSTEM: REACTOR BUILDINGI 'TEMP (F). ' i s I I NOTE '1 I
FLOOR DRAINS I I NORMAL I 104/77 I 110 I 1 s 2,4 I TEST-SIM I NA NOTE 2 SYSTEM I I ABNORMALs 79 I 110 I 1 s 2,4 I AN + DATA I NA I I I TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) I I ACCIDENT I 17S s 281 I 1 I 2 TEST-SIM I YES ~ LEVEL SWITCH I I PRESS(PSIG) I I I I NOTE 1 I I I NORMAL I 0 25"WG i ATMOS I 2 TEST-SIN NA I,
~ 1 I I I ABNORNALI -0.25"WG I ATNOS s 1 I 2 TEST-SIN I NA INANUFACTURER: MAGNETROL ACCIDENTI .25 I 18 1 I 2 TEST-SIN I YES I RH (/): I NOTE 1 INODEL NO.: NORMAL I 50 I 100 I 1 I 2 I TEST-SIN I NA A-153-X-EP/ VP-Y-8 I ND4 I ABNQRNALI 50 I 100 I 1 I 2 TEST-SIN I NA ISAFETY FUNCTION: I ACCIDENTs 100 I 100 I 1 I 2 I TEST-SIN I NA I SPENT FUEL POOL WTR LOW LVL s RADIATION' I s I I NOTE 1 ALN NORN GANMAs 7E5 I I
1 I I NA I I I ACC GANMA I 2.6E6 I 2.2E8 I 1 I 2 s TEST SIN ~ YES sOP. CODE: B I NORM BETA I NA I
~
1
~
I I NA
~ ACC BETA s 1.3E7 I iYES s
I NEUTRON s NA I 1 I I NA I ISPRAY NA I YES I NA 2 TEST-S IM NA ~ ACCURACY ISUBNERGENCEs s NA NA I NA I I NA NA
~
I NA rar arrrrrrr s SPEC: +/-0.25 rarrrara Drrrrrarrra Drr rara aa ra aar rraraaD ~ I DENOt +/-0.25 IZONE NO.: SC353202 I ISUBNERGENCE: NA DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1.FOR COMPLETE ENVIRQNMENTAL CONDITIONS, ISPRAY: NA 1. EQUIPNENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED-CRITERIA, EQEDC-1, REV 1, 1984. 2.NORMAL SPECIFIED TENP ARE SHOWN AS IEQUIPNENT NOT SUBJECT TO 2 VENDOR ENVIRONNENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT i NAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. ISUBNERGENCE OR SPRAY SDDF ¹ IEEE 07. 124-SOOOE s 3. POST-ACCIDENT OPERABILITY PERIOD: FILE NO. 34-2-C4 I DOCUNENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: I 4. CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-033 IACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588~CAT I I I ~ I ~
~ ~ ~ I I Is I NAINT/SURVEILL ~
I I
~
I
REFERENCE:
NA ~ I ~
~
I ~ I I iQUALIFIED LIFE s
~ I I ~
(YEARS): 11 I I
~ ~
REFERENCE:
2,4 ~ ~
~ I I ~
I ~
~ I I I I I ~ I
0 NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COI'(PONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF ¹ C021LAP REV 14-Mar-85 aacacaaaacaaaacaa ======= aaaacaazacaaaaaaaaazaaacaaaaaaaaaaaacacac aacaacccaazczaccaaaaaaacaaaaa<<zccaaacaaacaaaca>>a>>acaaaa ~ e
~
e e ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION e
~
e
~
e DOCUMENT REFERENCE I e c z caca e s PARAMETER s SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED s I QUAL eMARGINe REMARKS VALUE s VALUE I SPECIFIED ~ QUALIFIED s METHOD ~ DEMO ~ (EQUIP NO.: 2SFC+LSSSB e eaa a aaaec e aa ac a a a a
~ ~ c c c c c ascacaza a c ~ c e c a ~
ISPEC NO.: C021L I OP TIME I NA s 180 s 3 I 2 i AN + DATA i YES I (SYSTEM: REACTOR BUILDING TEMP (F) ' e NOTE 1 FLOOR DRAINS NORMAL I 104/77 s 1 10 ~ 1 s 2 4
~ s TEST SIM I NA I NOTE 2 SYSTEM s I ABNORMALs 79 i 110 I 1 I 2i4 I AN + DATA s NA =
I s TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) ACCIDENT s 17S s 281 s 1 I 2 I TEST-SI M I YES I s LEVEL SWITCH ~ s PRESS (PSIG) I s ~ s ~ I I NOTE 1 e se NORMAL s -0.25"WG s ATMOS e 1 e 2 I TEST-S I M I NA e e II ABNORMAL'0.25"WG s ATMOS I 1 I 2 I TEST-SIM I NA IMANUFRCTURER: MAGNETROL I I ACCIDENT I 2S ~ 18 I 1 s 2 s TEST SIM s YES e I sRH (%): s I NOTE 1 (MODEL NO.: ~ I NORMAL ~ 50 I 100 s 1 s 2 s TEST-SIM s NA s s A-153-X-EP/VP-Y-SIMD4 el RBNORMRLI 50 s 100 I 1 I 2 I TEST-SIM e NA e sSAFETY FUNCTION: RCCIDENT I 100 I 100 2 I TEST-SIM NA I I SPENT FUEL POOL WTR LOW LVL e I I s RADIATION: I - I I I 1 s I - I I e
- I NOTE si ALM Ie NORM GAMMRs 7E5 e NA e
e el ACC GAMMA I 2.6E6 I 2.2EB s 1 I 2 I TEST-SIM I YES e I OP. CODE: B le NORM BETA s NA 1 I NA I e e II ACC BETA s 1.3E7 I 1 I YES I e e II NEUTRON I NA e e 1 I NA ~ ((SPRAY NA YES I NA 2 TEST SIM i NA s s s ~ iiACCURRCY SPEC: +/-0.25 I
~ ~ ~
SUBMERGENCEs aaaa>> c = NA
= cc I
cc NA a<<a>>c a>>acc
~ NA --=------------
s NA s NA c- acac I NA c>> <<acaaaaaaaca s I DEMO: +/-0.25 e e e e e ~ e e ~ e (ZONE NO.: SC353202 e
~
e e (SUBMERGENCE: NA s ~ DOCUMENT REFERENCE NOTES: 1.FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS,s (SPRAY: NA 1. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. e I I CRITERIA~ EQEDC-1, REV 1 ~ 1984. 2.NORMAL SPECIFIED TEMP ARE SHOWN AS e sEQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO ( s 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. ISUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY. sis sSDDF ¹ IEEE 07. 124-SOOOE
- 3. POST-ACCIDENT OPERABILITY PERIOD:
I I FILE NO. 34-2-C4 sDOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: I e 4. CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-033 e IRCCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT I e e e e e e e e e e ~ ( e e e e e s MAINT/SURVEILL ~ e e e s
REFERENCE:
NA ~ e
~ ~
e e e e e e s QUALIFIED LIFE e
~
e e e (YEARS): 11 ~ e e
~
REFERENCE:
2.4 ~ e
~ ~ ~ ~
e e
~ e ~ ~
e ~ e ~ e e e e
0' NINE NILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUNBER 50-410 SYSTEN COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1
¹ REV 0 a aaaaa cacaaa 11-Nar-85 aa-QUAL REF C041DRA ea caaacaaaa a c- caa aaaca ac aaccca aaaaacacaaaaaa c == aaaaaaaaacacaacaccacc cacacaa s ~
s s ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPNENT DESCRIPTION s s
~
s
~ ~ I s DOCUNENT REF ERENCE s s sacaacaacaacaacacaaacacacccacaa s I PARANETER I SPECIFIED s QUALIFIED s I QUAL I MARGINs RENRRKS eVRLUE s I VALUE ii SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED s METHOD I DENO -=-
sEQUIP NO.: sSPEC NO.: (iSYSTEM: s 2CMS+TESOA C041D CONTAINNENT MONITORING SYSTEN i e
~
s(TEMP
~ I c a cacacaa I OP. TINE:
(F)- NORNAL I s aacacac NA 104/GS aaa ccccacccccc acccc c ii s s s
)100 DAYS I 1SO e
e s 3 1 s i I acccaaacaa, 2 2e4 s I a ccccca ascaacaas AN+DATA TEST-SIN s I t YES NA I
-I I
a-NOTE 1 aaaac NOTE 3 NOTE 2 s II ABNORMALI 92 I 190 I 1 s 2s4 I TEST SIN I NA ~ I TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) ~ I ACCIDENTS 175 I (00 ~ 1 s 2 I TEST-SIN I YES ~ RESISTANCE TEMPERATURE 'PRESS(PSIG) NOTE 1 1-0.25"WG TEST-SIN
's I DETECTOR (RTD) NORNAL I ATMOS 1 s
2 e s N4 I s s II 4BNORNAL(-0.25"WG I ATMOS I 1 s 2 s TEST-SIM I NA <<MANUFACTURER( PYCO s I RCCI DENT I 2. 8 s 63 1 ii 2 I TEST-SIN I YES I I RH (%): ~ I
~ ~ ~ NOTE 1 sNODEL NO.: 122-4030-04-2.7-82.3 es NORMAL I SO ii 100 I 1 2 I TEST-SIN ii N4 II ABNORMAL( SO t 100 I 1 s 2 I TEST-SIN e NA s SAFETY FUNCTION: e e ACCIDENT ~ 100 s STEAN I 1 s 2 ~ TEST-SIN I NA I NA ' RADIATION s NOTE 1 s
( I NORM GANNAI 1 ~ 1E6 s s 1 s s NA e s s le ACC GANNA I 2,6E6 I 2 2E8 I 1 I 2 I TEST-S IN I YES sOP. CODE: B ll NORN BETA I NA I 1 s sNA s I s ss ACC BETA I 1 3E7 1 s YES I
~
iNA s s ll NEUTRON e NA s 1 s s ((SPRAY I NA ( YES I NA I 2 t TEST SIN NR e IACCURACY SPEC: +/-1. 2F NOTE 5 IISUBNERGENCEI
'laaaaaaccccaaac-ca-a-NA -ca-- -aacacaccccac-a-I NA I NA NA --c cccccc e
a a a I NA a e NA cccccacccccccccacc aaaa DEMO: +/-1 ~ 2F s
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s s s (ZONE NO.: SC196113 s s ~
s s tSUBMERGENCE: II DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
N OTES: 1. FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONNENTAL CONDITIONS, s ISPRAY: I I 1 EQUIPNENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. I I CRITERIA, EQEDC-i, REV 1, NAY 2, 1984 ~ 2.NORNAL TENPERATURES RRE SHOWN AS IEQUIPNENT NOT SUBJECT TO I I 2. VENDOR ENVIRONNENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, NAX DESIGN/RVERAGE. sSUBNERGENCE OR SPRAY I I SDDF ¹ IEEE 07 145 5003 B THRU G 3.OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FRON 30. s s I 3. EQUIPNENT OPERABILITY TINE DATA SHEET: DAYS TESTED VALUE TO 100 DAYS PLUS I s FILE N0.33-2-CG NARGIN BY ANRLYSIS ~ I DOCUMENT4T ION ACCEPTABILITY: 4. SWEC CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-029 4.TERNINAL HEAD GASKET MUST BE REPLACED IACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT I le WITH A NEW GASKET WHENEVER HE4D COVER s
~ ~ ~ IS RENOVED, IN ORDER TO NAINTAIN I ~
s
~ ~ QUALIFICATION. ~ ~ ~ ~ 5.FACTORY CERTIFICATION TESTING OF RTD'Sli s H4S DEMONSTRATED ACCURACY OF <~/-1.0 Fl s NAINT/SURVEILL- ~ ~
s s THE QUALIFICATION TYPE TESTING HAS
REFERENCE:
2 (NOTE 4) II SHOWN AN ACCURACY OF +/-1.2 F. s ~ s A REVIEW OF THE SETPOINT CALCULATIONS (QUALIFIED LIFE s ~ s s s s s HAS SHOWN THAT ~/-1 ~ 2F IS AN I (YEARS): 40 ~
~ ~ ~ ACCEPTABLE ACCURACY.
s
REFERENCE:
2s4 s s s
~
i ~ s
~ s s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
( i II
NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF ¹ C041DAB REV 11-Mar-85 gazsaaaaa s zszs csaaaaaa a azs a a -a aaaaaaa aaa aaaaaaaa aaaa aaaaaaaaaazsascaaaaaazsa asc aaaaaaaasccscscsaaaaaaazsaaa aaa ~ s
~
s ~ s ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ~ s s s s e l DOCUMENT REFERENCE l
'aa aaaaaaasca aaaazsaaa aaaaaaaa l l PARAMETER s SPECIFIED e QUALIFIED l s QUAL IMARGINs REMARKS VALUE s VALUE s SPECIFIED l QUALIFIED l METHOD s DEMO l tEQUIP NO.: 2CMS+TESOB , aaaazs aaaa ~ aaaa ~ aaazsaaaaaaalaaaascaaaaaat aa aaaaaaa,aaaaaaaaaaaeaaaaaataacsaaaaascaa aaa, sSPEC NO.: C041D ltOP.TIME: s NA I >100 DAYS l 3 l 2 l AN+DATA s YES I NOTE 3 lSYSTEM: CONTAINMENT l'TEMP (F) t l s NOTE 1 MONITORING SYSTEM NORMAL l 104/85 s 150 s 1 I 2,4 l TEST-SIM l NA l NOTE 2 ss ABNORMAL'2 s 190 l 1 l 2,4 TEST-SIM l NA s TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) ll ACCIDENTI 175 I 400 l l 2 s
TEST-SIM I YES RESISTANCE TEMPERATURE I IPRESS(PSIG) I I - I 1 I l I
- l -le NOTE 1 DETECTOR (RTD) NORMAL 1-0. 25" WG e ATMOS I 1 s 2 l TEST-SIM s NA ABNORMALI -0. 25" WG l ATMOS s 1 l 2 l TEST-SIM l NA l lMANUFACTURER: PYCO s s ACCIDENT l 2. 8 e 63 l 1 l 2 s TEST-SI M I YES RH (/ 'sz s ~ ~
s i i s
~ ~
I ~ s s NOTE 1 lMODEL NO.: 122-4030-04-2.7-82.3 NORMAL l 50 l 100 s 1 l 2 s TEST-SIM I NA s l I ABNORMALs 50 l 100 s 1 ~ 2 e TEST-SIM l NA e ISAFETY FUNCTIONs ACCIDENT 100 STEAM 1 I 2 TEST-SIM l NA l
- s s s s e l NA I t RADIATION: s l I I NOTE
- i. 1E6 1 e e s NORM GAMMAs s1 s ~ e NA e ss ACC GAMMA l 2.6E6 s 2.2EG ~ 1 ~ 2 l TEST SIM s YES ~
lOP. CODE: B se NORM BETA l . NA s l l NA se ACC BETA l 1.3E7 l 1 l s s YES ss NEUTRON ~ NA I 1 NA I slSPRAY NA YES NA l 2 TEST-SIM NA lACCURACY s s e ~ s s llSUBMERGENCEl NA I NA s NA e NA l NA e NA SPEC: +/-1 2F
~ NOTE 5 a aaa 'aaacsaaaaszaaaa aa a aazszlcsaaazlaaa aaaaaaa'aaa a aa l DEMO: +/-1. 2F s ~ ~ ~
ABNORMAL s s s ~ t ZONE NO.: SC196113 s
~ ~
s lSUBMERGENCE: ss DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1.FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, s lSPRAY: s l 1. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. s l CRITERIA, EQEDC-i, REV 1, MAY 2, 1984. 2 TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS ssEQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO 1 s 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE.
'sSUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY ll SDDF ¹ IEEE-07-145-5003 B THRU G 3.OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FROM 30 e s 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TIME DATA SHEET: DAYS TESTED VALUE TO 100 DAYS PLUS FILE N0.33-2-C8 MARGIN BY ANALYSIS.
sDOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: 4. SWEC CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-029 4.TERMINAL HEAD GASKET MUST BE REPLACED lACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT Isl WITH A NEW GASKET WHENEVER HEAD COVER s IS REMOVED, IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN s s QUALIFICATION. s 5 ~ FACTORY CERTIFICATION TESTING OF RTD'Sl s s HAS DEMONSTRATED ACCURACY OF (+/-1.0 Fl l MAINT/SURVE ILL THE QUALIFICATION TYPE TESTING HAS
REFERENCE:
2 (NOTE 4) SHOWN AN ACCURACY OF +/-1.2 F. A REVIEW OF THE SETPOINT CALCULATIONS QUALIFIED LIFE s s s HAS SHOWN THAT +/-1. 2F IS AN I (YEARS): 40 ~ s ACCEPTABLE ACCURACY. 's
REFERENCE:
2,4 s s
~ ~
e s
~ ~
s ~ s ~
~ ~ ~ s ~ s s ~
0 NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUNBER 50-410 SYSTEN CONPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF ¹ C041DAD REV 11-Mar-85
~ a ra 'r r rr aaa aa raa aaa ==== = aaaaaraaraaaraaararaaaa aaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaraa raa assraaaaaraae ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICRTION I e EOUIPNENT DESCRIPTION I s I ~ DOCUMENT REFERENCE iiarraaaaaaaaaaarrrara rrraarara i s P4R4NETER s SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED s QUAL I NRRG IN s REMARKS SPECIFIED QUALIFIED I NETHOD I EQUIP NO.: 2CMS+TESOD s iaaaaraaaraa iraaaaaaa s e VALUE r ' ~ VALUE aaraaaaaaa I
ii a aarrraaa I is I DENO raaaaaara aalaaaaraaaaaassaaaaaassaaaraaaaaaaaraaa'I I SPEC NO.: C041D I OP TIME' NA I >100 DAYS 3 I 2 RN+DATA I YES I NOTE 3 I -I NOTE 1 s ~ eSYSTEN: CONTA INNENT 'ENP (F) s MONITORING SYSTEN NORMAL I 104/85 s 150 I 1 I 2,4 s TEST-SIN I NA I NOTE 2 s s s s ABNORMALI 92 I 190 I 1 e 2,4 s TEST-SIM I NA s s TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) s ACCIDENT I 175 I 400 s 1 s 2 ii TEST-SIN I YES si RESISTANCE TEMPER4TURE 'PRESS(PSIG) ' ' ' i ~ s s I s NOTE 1 DETECTOR (RTD) NORMAL l-0.25"WG s ATNOS I 1 I 2 s TEST-SIN I NA s ABNORNALI-0.25"WG s ATNOS I 1 s 2 I TEST-SIN s NA I INANUFACTURER: PYCO ACCIDENT I 2 8 ~ 63 ~ 1 i 2 s TEST-SIM s YES s s s ~ s s
~
s s s
~ ~
s NOTE 1 INQDEL NO.: 122-4030-04-2.7-82.3l I NORMAL I 50 e 1 00 ~ 1 ~ 2 ~ TEST-SIN I NA s
~ RBNORM4LI 50 ~ 100 I TEST-S IM s NA s ISAFETY FUNCTION: ~ RCCIDENTI 100 I STEAN I 1 I 2 s TEST-SIN s NA s s NA 'ADIATION s s ~
NOTE 1 NORN GANM4 I 1. 1Eb s s 1 s s NA I ACC GAMNA I 2.6Eb I 2.2E8 I 1 I 2 I TEST-SIN e YES I OP. CODE: B I NORN BETA s N4 I 1 s NA si I I ACC BETA I 1 ~ 3E7 s 1 I s I YES s s NEUTRON s NA 1 I NA s ISPRAY s NA i YES I NA s 2 s TEST-S IM s NA I IACCURACY ISUBMERGENCEs NA I NA NA I NA NA I NA I SPEC: ~/-1.2F NOTE 5 i aa r a raa rra ra r s aaraaaaaaaaaararrra r a s raaaa rr r s aarraaaa a i I DEMO: +/-1.2F I s s s s I s I ZONE NO.: SC196113 s ISUBMERGENCE: DOCUNENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1. FOR CONPLETE ENVIRONNENTAL CONDITIONS, I ISPRAY: ii 1. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENT4L DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. CRITERIAs EQEDC-1 s REV 1 s MAY 2 s 1984 NORMAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS I IEQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO I 2. VENDOR ENVIRONNENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, NAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. sSUBNERGENCE OR SPRAY SDDF ¹ IEEE-07-145-5003 B THRU G 3. OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FROM 30 I s 3. EQUIPNENT OPER4BILITY TINE DATA SHEET: DAYS TESTED VALUE TO 100 DAYS PLUS s s FILE NO.33-2-CG MARGIN BY ANALYSIS. IDOCUNENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: I 4 ~ SWEC CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-029 TERMINAL HEAD GASKET NUST BE REPLACED IRCCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT is Iis WITH 4 NEW 84SKET WHENEVER HEAD COVER s IS RENOVED, IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN s p s QUALIFICATION. s s 5.FACTORY CERTIFICATION TESTING OF RTD'Sl HAS DENONSTRATED ACCURRCY OF <+/-1 ' Fs I MR INT/SURVE ILL- THE QUALIFICATION TYPE TESTING HAS
REFERENCE:
2 (NOTE 4) SHOWN AN RCCURACY OF +/-1.2 F. s A REVIEW OF THE SETPOINT CALCULATIONS I QUALIFIED LIFE HAS SHOWN THAT +/-1 ~ 2F IS AN (YEARS): 40 ACCEPTABLE ACCURACY.
REFERENCE:
2,4 ~ ~ s e s s
~ ~
s s
~ s ~ I s s
NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 NUMBER 50-410 'OCKET SYSTEM COMPONENT EV4LUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF ¹ C041DAE REV 11-Mar-85 RR RRCC ZRRICRC Ra aaaaaaaac ac Raxaxa aaaa aaccaa ==- a aa aaaaaa a caaaxaaaaccc aaa aaacixraaaaaaaaxa I
~ ~ I ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION I I I EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ~ ~
I I~
~
DOCUMENT REFERENCE Raaaaaa Rcax R c RRRR si PARAMETER l SPEC IF IE D s QUALIFIED I QUAL s M4RG IN REMARKS le VALUE SPECIFIED QUALIFIED xaci l l VALUE I s METHOD I DEMO I l EQUIP NO.: 2CMS+TE514 a cac ,'aaaccacaaci ac', accaciccccccc a races iIcaaaa a Rara R R Ci C CI R Ci ~ ciaccaaa l I SPEC NO.: C041D lOP. TIME: )100 Race,'N+DATA l ~ NA DAYS I 2 YES NOTE 3 l SYSTEM: CONTAINMENT l l TEMP (F): I I I I I l NOTE 1 MONITORING SYSTEM ll NORMAL 104/85 150 I 2,4 TEST-S I M l NA NOTE 2 ABNORMAL 92 190 TEST-SIM NA l TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) ACCIDENT 175 400 2 ~ TEST-SIM YES RESISTANCE TEMPERATURE I I PRESS (PS IG) I I l I I NOTE 1 DETECTOR (RTD) il NORMAL s-0.25"WG ATMOS 2 TEST-SIM NA l ll ABNORMALI-0.25"WG 4TMOS 2 I TEST-SIM NA IMANUFACTURER: PYCO I s ACCIDENT I 2.8 63 2 TEST-SIM l YES I IRH (%): I
~
I
~
I NOTE 1 liMODEL NO.: 122-4030-04-2.7-82.3 iil NORMAL l 50 100 I I TEST-SIM I NA ls ABNORMALI 50 100 2 l TEST-SIM NA I SAFETY FUNCTION: se ACCIDENT s 100 STEAM I ~ TEST-S I M s NA I NA s I R4DIATION: I I ~ I I NOTE 1 l sl NORM GAMMAI 1. 1E6 1 I I NA I ACC GAMMA 2. 6E6 2. 2EB 1 2 TEST-S IM s YES iiOP. CODE: B sl NORM BETA NA 1 NA I ACC BETA I l. 3E7 1
' I YES ll NEUTRON I N4 NA IISPRAY l NA YES NA TEST-SIM NA IACCURACY ilSUBMERGENCE I NA NA NA N4 NA l SPEC: +/-1.2F NOTE 5 xac RRRic'Icaaic DEMO: +/-1 2F ~
ABNORMAL I ~ ~ I I ~ I l ZONE NO.: SC196113 <<l IBUBMERGENCE: ll DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1.FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, I lSPRAY: s I 1. EQUIPMENT QUAl IFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. I I l >> CRITERIA, EQEDC-1, REV 1, MAY 2, 1984 ~ 2 TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS lEQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO l I 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. lSUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY sl SDDF ¹ IEEE-07-145-5003 B THRU G 3.OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FROM 30 l l l l 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TIME DATA SHEET: DAYS TESTED VALUE TO 100 DRYS PLUS I'l FILE NO.33-2-CB MARGIN BY ANALYSIS' lDOCUMENTATION s I 4. SWEC CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-029 4 ~ TERMINAL HERD GASKET MUST BE REPLACED 0588,CAT I I I ACCEPTABILITY'ACCEPTABLE TO NUREG ~ I WITH A NEW GASKET WHENEVER HEAD COVER l I I I I I I IS REMOVED, IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN I I QUAL IF I CATION. I I l I ~ 5.FACTORY CERTIFICATION TESTING OF RTD'Si I ~ I ~ HAS DEMONSTRATED ACCUR4CY OF (+/-1.0 Fs I MAINT/SURVE ILL ~ I
~ I THE QUALIFIC4TION TYPE TESTING HAS s
I
REFERENCE:
2 (NOTE 4) ~
~ ~ ~ SHOWN AN ACCURACY OF +/-1.2 F.
I ~
~ ~
I 4 REVIEW OF THE SETPOINT CALCULATIONS I QUALIFIED LIFE el HAS SHOWN THAT +/-1. 2F IS AN (YEARS): 40 ~ l ACCEPTABLE ACCURACY. I
REFERENCE:
2,4 ~ ~
~ ~
I I I I
~ ~ ~ I I I ~ ~
NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF ll C041DAF 11-Mar-85 ~ QUAL REF ac ca azs ac REV 0 c a a caa zsazsazsac ac a acaaaaaaacaaaaa == a aa area aac- a c racaaaaazszszsazsaaaaaa, s ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION l s s DOCUMENT REFERENCE l ~ aaasz aazs zsziszcazi accaaacccsz czlc e l PARAMETER l SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED l l QUAL lMARGINl REMARKS s s s s VALUE ~ VALUE s SPECIFIED s QUALIFIED I METHOD I DEMO s lEQUIP NO.: 2CMS+TE51B eaaaaaaaaacc'laaacaaccaca'laaacaaaacazs,aaaaacaaaca,acaccaaac zszsecszccczsaazz aa ezs cacccc caracas lSPEC NO.: sOP. TIME: )100 DAYS l 3 2 AN+DATA l YES NOTE 3 lSYSTEM: C041D CONTAINMENT s l TEMP (F) l NA e ~ I l -' l NOTE 1 MONITORING SYSTEM NORMAL s 104/85 l 150 ' ~ 1 s 2z4 TEST SIM i NA ~ NOTE 2 s s s s ~ ABNORMALs 92 l 190 1 s 2,4 l TEST-SIM e NA 175 400 2 TEST-SIM YES l TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) RESISTANCE TEMPERATURE ACCIDENT
'PRESS(PSIG)' ~ s l 1 s s l '
s
-' NOTE 1 DETECTOR (RTD) NORMAL l-0.25"WG s ATMOS l 1 I 2 l TEST-SIM s NA ~
s
~ ABNORMALl-0.25"WG e ATMOS s 1 s 2 l TEST-SIM I NA s ~ MANUFACTURER: PYCO I ACCIDENT l 2. 8 s 63 1 I 2 TEST-SIM s YES s
s I'I z ~ s s l s NOTE 1 IMODEL NO.: 122-4030-04-2.7-82.3s NORMAL l 50 s 100 s 1 l 2 TEST-S I M s NA s s s s ABNORMAL( 50 l 100 l 1 s 2 l TEST S IM ~ NA l SAFETY FUNCTION: ACCIDENTe 100 l STEAM s 1 s 2 I TEST-SIM s NA s NA 'ADIATION ~ ~ ~ NOTE 1 s NORM GAMMAI 1. 1Eb I 1 e l NA l I s ACC GAMMA s 2.6E6 ~ 2.2EG I 1 s s TEST-S I M s YES l I l OP. CODE: B s NORM BETA s - NA 1 I NA s l ACC BETA s 1 'E7 e I - 1 l l s YES I I s NEUTRON s NA s e 1 s s NA ~ lSPRAY l NA I YES l NA l 2 s TEST-S I M s NA s l sACCURACY lSUBMERGENCEl NA ~ NA l NA l NA I NA ~ NA s SPEC: +/-1 ~ 2F NOTE 5 aa c a a a arear a ~ DEMO: +/-1. 2F s s s ZONE NO.: SC196113 eSUBMERGENCE: ~ DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1. FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, l siSPRAY: l 1. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. s CRITERIA, EQEDC-1, REV 1, MAY 2, 1984. 2. NORMAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS sEQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO I 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. l sSUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY l SDDF l) IEEE-07-145-5003 B THRU G 3e OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FROM 30 s s s 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TIME DATA SHEET: DAYS TESTED VALUE TO 100 DAYS PLUS s
- FILE NO.33-2-CG MARGIN BY ANALYSIS.
I DOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: ~ 4. SWEC CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-029 4 ~ TERMINAL HEAD GASKET MUST BE REPLACED s lACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT Isl WITH A NEW GASKET WHENEVER HEAD COVER IS REMOVED, IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN QUAL IF I CAT ION.
- 5. FACTORY CERTIFICATION TESTING OF RTD'Sil HAS DEMONSTRATED ACCURACY OF (+/-1.0 Fl lMAINT/SURVEILL- THE QUALIFICATION TYPE TESTING HAS
REFERENCE:
2 (NOTE 4) SHOWN AN ACCURACY OF +/-1 ~ 2 F. A REVIEW OF THE SETPOINT CALCULATIONS
~ QUALIFIED LIFE HAS SHOWN THAT +/-1 'F IS AN (YEARS): 40 ACCEPTABLE ACCURACY'
REFERENCE:
2,4 ~ s
~ s s ~
s ~ s ~
~ ~ ~ s s ~
NINE NILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEN COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF ¹ C041DAG REV 11-Nar-85 a a
~ ~ ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QURLIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I DOCUNENT REFERENCE I
~
'ssRRRcla saclsaa RRssexz&RRRKRa I a PARANETER e SPECIFIED s QUALIFIED I I QUAL e MARGIN I REMRRKS VALUE ~ VALUE ~ SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED I NETHOD ~ DENO I I EQUIP NO.: 2CNS+TE51C I ~ >= =- I ms=as:saassean I aaeasem mam cR I seD e ERE I a-QRRcR'chas I clsRcass I RsxsslRsscs'c!se ~
sSPEC NO.: C041D (OP. TINE: NA I )100 DAYS I 3 I 2 I RN+DRTA I YES I NOTE 3 a sSYSTEM: CONTA INNENT I
'TENP (F) s I I s -I NOTE 1 a NONITORING SYSTEN NORNAL ~ 1 04/85 ~ 1 50 ~ 1 ~ 2a4 TEST SIM ~ NA ~ NOTE 2 a II ABNORNALa 92 s 190 e 1 I 2,4 TEST-S IN a NA I s TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) s e ACCIDENT I 175 I 400 a 1 I 2 TEST-SIM I YES I RESISTANCE TEMPERATURE PRESS (PSIG) a I a
a a a a a NOTE 1 DETECTOR (RTD) ss NORMAL s-0.25"WG \ 4TNOS a 1 I 2 I TEST-SIN I NA a a sl ABNORNALe-0.25"WG s ATNOS I 1 s 2 I TEST-8 IN e NA a INANUFACTURER: PYCO ACCIDENT I 2. 8 s 63 e 1 I 2 TEST-SIN I YES a
'RH (/)
a ~
~
a a a a I a a a a ~ ~ NOTE 1 sNODEL NO.: 122-4030-04-2 '-82.3 NORNAL I 50 I 100 s 1 s 2 I TEST-SIN TEST-SIN s NA I ABNORNALI 50 e 100 I 1 I 2 s I NA I SAFETY FUNCTION: ACCIDENTs 100 STEAN I 1 2 TEST-SIN I N4 I
~ s s s
s N4 'RADIATION I ' ' I a NOTE 1 I I NORM GANNA s 1. 1Eb I s 1 I a NA a II ACC GANNA I 2 'E6 I 2.2EB s 1 I 2 s TEST-S IN I YES s I OP. CODE: B NORN BETA I N4 a 1 I I NA I Is ACC BETA 1.3E7 I s YES I eN4 s a le NEUTRON e NA I a 1 ~ l I a IsSPRAY I NA s YES s NA I 2 TEST-SIN I NA e IACCURACY s ~ SIJBNERGENCEI NA I NA s NA I NA e NA s NA e a SPEC: +/-1. 2F NOTE 5 ~ R R a RR a s LIT % s R R R Ra Ra R a ~%e Rg as@Re Rss R a RRs s KCSR DENO: +/-1. 2F a
~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~
ZONE NO.: SC196113 ~ ~ I a a sSUBNERGENCE: es DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1. FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONNENTAL CONDITIONS, a eSPRAY: I s i. EQUIPNENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUNENT REFERENCED. e CRITERIA, EQEDC-1, REV 1, NAY 2, 1984. 2.NORMAL TENPERATURES RRE SHOWN AS IEQUIPNENT NOT SUBJECT TO I I 2. VENDOR ENVIRONNENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, NAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. eSUBNERGENCE OR SPRAY II SDDF ¹ IEEE-07-145-5003 B THRU G 3.OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FRON 30 I s 3. EQUIPNENT OPERABILITY TINE DATA SHEET: DAYS TESTED VALIJE TO 100 DAYS PLUS a
,FILE N0.33-2-CB NARGIN BY ANALYSIS.
s DOCUNENTATI ON ACCEPTABILITY: I ~ 4. SWEC CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-029 4 'ERMINAL HEAD G4SKET NUST BE REPLACED IACCEPTRBLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT I a
~
a
~ WITH 4 NEW GASKET WHENEVER HEAD COVER a
IS RENOVED, IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN a a QUALIFICATION. a 5. FACTORY CERTIFICATION TESTING OF RTD'Sl a a e
~ HAS DEMONSTRATED 4CCURACY OF (+/-1.0 FI MAINT/SURVEILL a a THE QUALIFICATION TYPE TESTING HAS s
REFERENCE:
2 (NOTE 4)
~ ~
SHOWN AN ACCURACY OF +/-1.2 F. a a a
~
a A REVIEW OF THE SETPOINT CALCULATIONS IQUALIFIED LIFE a
~
s a HAS SHOWN THAT +/-1.2F IS AN (YEARS): 40 ~ a
~ ~
ACCEPTABLE ACCURACY' REF ERENCE: 2,4 ~
~ ~ ~
a
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~
a ~
~ a
NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF ¹ C041DAH REV aaac 11-Mar-85 ccaaacccaaacaccaaaacccacaccaa aaaacaaaaa aaa ace cac a ace aaaaa ac acccaacacaaaaacacacaaa aaacacacacaaaacaaaccacaacraaay I s ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION s s
~
s II I I I DOCUMENT REFERENCE I I saaaaaaaaacaaaaaaaaaccaaaacsaaa sEQUIP NO.: ISPEC NO.t ISYSTEM: 2CMS+TESiD C041D CONTAINMENT
~
s
~ ~ ~ ~
s
~
s PARAMETER aaaacaa OP. TIME: TEMP (F):
~
I a a ac s I SPECIFIED VALUE
~ ~
s s QUALIFIED c--a---a c-ca-c VALUE aaaa
>100 DAYS I
I ss s SPECIFIED aacc
'3 a
I ss QUALIFIED a 2 a I I ss s
~
s a QUAL METHOD aaaa AN+DATA ss I MARGIN s I DEMO I e I
~
YES sa I
~
s REMARKS NOTE 3 NOTE 1 s MONITORING SYSTEM s s s
~ NORMAL I 104/85 150 1 s 2,4 ~ TEST-S IM s NA s NOTE 2 s
s le ABNORMALI 92 190 1 I 2,4 I TEST-SI M s NA I I TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) s
~ ~
s RCCIDENTs 175 400 s 1 2 TEST SIM YES
-I ~ ~
RESISTANCE TEMPERATURE PRESS (PSIG) I s s s s s NOTE 1 s DETECTOR (RTD) ~ s s s NORMAL s -0 25"WG ATMOS 1 I TEST-SIM s NA II ABNORMALss -0 25"WG ATMOS 1 2 I TEST-S I M I NA I s s ~ MANUFACTURER PYCO ACCIDENT I 2.8 63 1 2 I TEST-S I M s YES s s II RH (/): s s I s NOTE 1 s s I MODEL NO.: 122-4030-04-2. 7-82. 3 s ~ NORMAL s 50 100 s 1 2 I TEST-8 I M I NA s s s I I ABNORMALI 50 100 1 s I TEST-SIM I NA s s s ISAFETY FUNCTION: s
~ ~
s ACCIDENT I 100 STEAM 1 2 TEST-SI M s NA s s I NA s s s s RADIATION: s s s s s s s s NOTE 1 s s s el NORM GAMMAs 1. 1E6 s 1 s I NA s s s II RCC GAMMA I 2 'E6 2.2E8 1 I TEST-S I M I YES s s s OP. CODE: B s s s s NORM BETA s NA 1 s I NA s s
~
s s s ACC BETA 1. 3E7 1 s I YES s s s s
~
s NEUTRON NA 1 s sNA s ss s s
~
s s s SPRAY NA YES NA TEST-S I M s NA s IACCURACY s s s s SUBMERGENCEI NA NA I NA I NA s NA SPEC: +/-1 ~ 2F NOTE 5 ~
~
s s se caccaccccccc caca cca ccccc c aeeac DEMO: +/-1. 2F s s
~
s s I I ZONE NO.: SC196113 ~ s s s ISUBMERGENCE: s s s s DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1. FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, I sSPRAY: s
~ ~
s 1. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. s
~
s
~ CRITERIA r EGEDC-1 s REV I t MAY 2 s 1984 ~ 2 s NORMAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS sEQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO ~ ~ ~
s 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPO RT, MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. ~ SUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY s s s s SDDF ¹ IEEE-07-145-5003 B THRU G 3 s OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FROM 30 s s e
~
s
~ 3 ~ EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TIME DATA SHEET: DAYS TESTED VALUE TO 100 DAYS PLUS s
s s s
~ FILE NO ~ 33-2-CG MARGIN BY ANRLYSIS.
I DOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY ~
~
s s 4. SWEC CALCULATION NO. 12177-EGS-02'9 4. TERMINAL HEAD GASKET MUST BE REPLRCED I IACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT WITH A NEW GASKET WHENEVER HEAD COVER I s s
~ ~
s
~ IS REMOVED, IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN s
s s s s QUALIFICATION. FRCTORY CERTIFICATION TESTING OF RTD Sl s ~ s s
~ ~
s HAS DEMONSTRATED ACCURACY OF <+/-).0 Fs I MA I NT/SURVE ILL ~
~
s s THE QUALIFICATION TYPE TESTING HAS
REFERENCE:
2 (NOTE 4)
~
s s
~
s
~ SHOWN AN ACCURACY OF ~/-1.2 F. ~ ~ A REVIEW OF THE SETPOINT CALCULATIONS IQUALIFIED LIFE ~
s
~ ~ HAS SHOWN THAT +/-1. 2F IS AN (YEARS): 40 s s ~ ~ ACCEPTABLE ACCURACY'
REFERENCE:
2,4 ~ s s s s s s ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s ~ s s ~ ~ ~
NINE NILE POINT - UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER SO-410 SYSTEN COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1
¹ I-Nar-85
~ QUAL REF
-= aaaaaaac C041DAI caaaac acc REV aac caaaaaaa aaac c aacaaaaaaca aa ca aaaaaa -====== a ccaaaaaaaaaaccaaa cacaaacaaaa 1
aaa aa a
~
I
~
I ENVIRONNENTAL CONDITIONS RND QUALIFICATION I I EQUIPNENT DESCRIPTION I I I ~ DOCUNENT REFERENCE I I ~ caaa aaacaa c aaa- -aaaaa el PARANETER I SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED ls s QUAL I MARGIN I RENARKS
~ ~
I
~ VALUE I VALUE SPECIFIED QUALIFIED I NETHOD I DENO I IEQUIP NO.: 2CMS+TE524 ~ ~ ~ ~ I caee ' ac aaaaccaa aaaccaaac I aa I acccca I aaaaaaaa aaaac I sSPEC NO.: C041D I OP. TINE: I NA )100 DAYS I 2 t AN+DATA I YES I NOTE 3 ISYSTEN: CONT4INNENT s
ttTEMP (F): I ~ I
~ I ' -I NOTE 1 NONITORING SYSTEM II NORMAL I 104/85 150 I 2e4 s TEST-SIN I NA I NOTE 2 I II ABNORNALI 92 I 190 I 2,4 I TEST-SIN I NA
~ TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) ACCIDENT I 17S I 400 2 I TEST-SIN I YES RESISTANCE TEMPERATURE I I PRESS (PS IG) I I I
~
I I s
-s NOTE 1 DETECTOR (RTD) II NORNAL l-0.2S"WG ATNOS 2 s TESTS IN I NA se ABNORNALs-0.25"WG I ATMOS I I TEST-S I M I NA I sNANUFACTURER: PYCO t s ACCIDENT I 2.8 I 63 I 2 I TEST-SIM t YES I I
I seRH (/): I ~ I NOTE 1 INODEL NO.: 122-4030-04-2.7-82.3 Il NORNAL 50 100 2 I TEST-SIM I NA I I I ABNORNAL 50 100 2 I TEST-SIM I NA I I SAFETY FUNCTION: II e ACCIDENT 100 STERN 2 I TEST-SIN s NA I I I NA I I RADIATION: ~ I I NOTE 1 I NA Is NORN GANNA 1 ~ 1E6 I I I'CC GANNA 2. 6E6 2. 2EG 1 2 ~ TEST S IN ~ YES I OP. CODE: B It NORM BETA NA 1 I NA I II ACC BETA 1. 3E7 1 I YES I II NEUTRON NA 1 ~ NA I I s ~ SPRAY NA YES NA 2 I TEST SIN ~ NA ~ IACCURACY IISUBMERGENCE NA NA NA N4 s NA t N4 I SPEC: ~/-1 2F
~ NOTE 5 ~ ~
I I a DEMO: +/-1. 2F I
~ ~ ~
I I I I I
~ I I
I ZONE NO.: SC196113 I I
~ ~
ISUBMERGENCE: DOCUNENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1 ~ FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONNENTAL CONDITIONS, I ISPRAY: s I 1 ~ EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONNENTAL DESIG N SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. s I CRITERIA, EQEDC-1, REV 1, NAY 2, 1984. 2.NORNAL TENPERAT+JRES ARE SHOWN AS IEQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO I I 2 ~ VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. I
~ SUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY SDDF ¹ IEEE-07-145-5003 B THRU G 3.OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FRON 30 I I 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY 'TINE DATA SHEET: DAYS TESTED VALUE TO 100 DAYS PLUS I I I - = FILE NO.33-2-C8 MARGIN BY ANALYSIS.
s DOCUMENTATION ACCEPTRBILITY: I I 4. SWEC CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-029 4. TERNINAL HEAD GASKET NUST BE REPLRCED I IIACCEPTABLE TO NUREG OS88,CAT II ~
~
I WITH A NEW GASKET WHENEVER HEAD COVER I ~ I
~ ~ IS RENOVED, IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN I I ~ ~
I QUALIFICATION. I
~ ~ ~ ~ 5.FACTORY CERTIFIC4TION TESTING OF RTD'Sl I I ~
I I HAS DENONSTRATED ACCURACY OF (+/-1.0 Fs IMAINT/SURVEILL ~ I ~ I THE QUALIFICATION TYPE TESTING HAS I
REFERENCE:
2 (NOTE 4). I I I I SHOWN AN ACCURACY OF +/-1.2 F. I I I I ~ I A REVIEW OF THE SETPOINT CALCULATIONS I s QUALIFIED LIFE I I
~ I HAS SHOWN TH4T +/-1.2F IS AN I I I (YEARS): 40 ~ I ACCEPTABLE ACCURACY.
REFERENCE:
2,4 I I
~ I I I I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
I I
NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PRGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF (I C041DAK REV 0 11-Mar-85 a a aacaaaaa aa aaaaaaaa aa aaararaa acr -=-- aaaarrcaaaraaraaaaaaaaraaa c- a aa aaararcarr aaaaraa aarcaaaaaa = r s ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION e I DOCUMENT REFERENCE I saraaaaaarrraararr araaaaar>>aas I PARAMETER I SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED I I QUAL I MARGIN s REMARKS s s VALUE s VALUE s SPECIFIED s QUALIFIED s METHOD s DEMO sEQUIP NO.: 2CMS+TE52C crra s a aaa a a I ccrc aaaara aaaaaraaaa-s s raaaaa z a aaacaaaaa s I aa rra I aaraaaaaa aaaa a ~ ISPEC NO.: C041D ~ OP ~ TIME s NA I >100 DAYS I 3 ~ 2 ~ AN+DATA s YES I NOTE 3 ISYSTEM: CONTAINMENT I TEMP (F) I I I s I ~ I NOTE 1 MONITORING SYSTEM NORMAL s 104/8S I 150 s 1 ~ 2,4 s TEST-SIM s NA I NOTE 2 2,4 s s s ABNORMALs 92 I 190 s 1 s I TEST-SIM I N4 I TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) RESISTANCE TEMPERATURE DETECTOR (RTD) s s I ACCIDENTs sPRESS(PSIG)s----- NORMAL 1-0.25"WG 175 s I sATMOS s 400 s I ss 1 1 s 2 2 I I I
-----s---s-NOTE TEST-SIM TEST-8 I M s
I YES NA s 1 s s s s ABNORMAL 0 25 WG s I ATMOS I 1 2 I TEST-S I M s N4 I MANUFACTURER PYCO s ACCIDENTI 2.8 I 63 I 1 I 2 s TEST-SIM I YES s s I jb ~ I $ s s e I s I
~
NOTE 1 ~ MODEL NO.: 122-4030-04-2.7-82.31 NORMAL I 50 s 100 I 1 I 2 I TEST-SIM I NA s ABNORMALI SO I 100 I 1 I 2 I TEST-SIM s N4 I SAFETY FUNCTION: ACCIDENT 100 I STE4M I 1 2 TEST-SIM NA s s NA s I RADIATION: I I I s s s s s ss - ss NOTE 1 s s s NORM GAMMAI 1. 1Eb I 1 s s NA s ACC GAMMA I 2.6Eb I 2. 2E8 s 1 s 2 s TEST-SIM I YES s IOP. CODE: B I NORM BETR s NA s 1 s NA I ACC BETA I 1.3E7 s 1 s s YES I NEUTRON I NA 1 NA s ISPR4Y I NA I YES s NA 2 s TEST-S IM s NA IACCURRCY sSUBMERGENCEs NA I NA s NA I NA s NA s N4 SPEC: +/-1; 2F NOTE 5 sraaaaaaaaraaaarraaaaaaaaaararraaaaararraaaaaaraaaaraa aaaaarraaaacraraaraaarrarraaaaaaaaraaaara DEMO: +/-1. 2F s s ZONE NO.: SC196113 sSUBMERGENCE: DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1.FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS,I sSPRAY: s 1. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. s CRITERIA, EQEDC-1, REV 1, MAY 2, 1984 ~ 2.NORM4L TEMPERATURES RRE SHOWN AS IEQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO I 2. VENDOR ENVIRONI'1ENTAL QUAL IFICRT ION REPORT, MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. ~ SUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY s SDDF II IEEE-07-14S-5003 B THRU G 3.OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FROM 30 s 3. EQUIPMENT OPER4BILITY TIME DATA SHEET: DAYS TESTED VALUE TO 100 DAYS PLUS s s FILE NO.33-2-C8 MARGIN BY AN4LYSIS. I DOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: 4. SWEC CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-029 4.TERMINAL HEAD GASKET MUST BE REPLACED IACCEPTABLE TO NUREG OS88,C4T Il WITH A NEW GASKET WHENEVER HEAD COVER I s IS REMOVED, IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN QUALIFICATION. 5.FACTORY CERTIFICRTION TESTING OF RTD'Sl s HAS DEMONSTRATED RCCURACY OF (+/-1.0 Fl ~ MAINT/SURVE ILL THE QUALIFICATION TYPE TESTING HAS I
REFERENCE:
2 (NOTE 4) s SHOWN AN ACCURACY OF +/-1 ~ 2 F ~ s s A REVIEW OF THE SETPOINT C4LCULATIONS s IQUALIFIED LIFE HAS SHOWN THAT +/-1.2F IS AN (YEARS): 40 I RCCEPTABLE ACCUR4CY. I
REFERENCE:
2,4
~ ~
s ~ s s
~ ~
s ~
~ s s s ~ ~
NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QU4L REF II C041DAL REV 0 ii-Mar-85 aaaa ass aa aa aa aaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaa aa I ~
~ ~
s ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ~
~
s
~
s s ~ DOCUMENT REFERENCE I aaaa aa aa PAR4METER I SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED I QUAL s MARGIN I REMARKS VRLUE SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED I METHOD aaaaaa,aaaaaaaVALUE s I DEMO
~ ~ ~ e I sEQUIP NO.: 2CMS+TE52D ~ ~ ~ ~ aaaaaaaaaa ,aaa ~
aa aaza aalaaaaaaaaaaasaaaaaaaaaaaeaaaaaalaaaa a a ISPEC NO.: C041D OP TIME I NA I )100 DAYS I 3 2 I AN+DATA YES NOTE 3 I ISYSTEM: CONTAINMENT I se TEMP (F): s s I
~
I I - -- s I -I I
- NOTE 1 MONITORING SYSTEM' l NORMAL I 104/85 I. 150 I 1 I 2,4 I TEST-SIM e NA I NOTE 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ ABNORMALI 92 s 190 I 1 s 2,4 I TEST-SIM s NA I TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) II ACCIDENT I 175 I 400 1 I 2 TEST-SIM YES RESISTANCE TEMPERATURE s ~ PRESS(PSIG) s - I - '
s s I s NOTE 1 DETECTOR (RTD) NORMAL ~ 0 25'G s ATMOS I 1 ~ 2 I TEST SIM I NA I ABNORMALI -0. 25 "WG s ATMOS s 1 I 2 ~ TEST-SI M I NA I sMANUFACTURER: PYCO ACCIDENT I 2. 8 s 63 I 1 s 2 I TEST-S IM I YES s s
~ ~ R s s s
e s s s s
~
NOTE 1 IMODEL NO.: 122-4030-04-2.7-82.3II NORMAL I 50 ~ 100 ~ 1 ~ 2 ~ TEST SIM I NA I ABNORMRLI 50 ~ 100 I 1 I 2 I TEST-SIM s NA ISRFETY FUNCTION: ~ ~ ACCIDENT 100 STEAM I 1 I 2 I TEST-SIM I NA s NA RADIATION: s I - - s I - ~ s I I s NOTE 1 s ~ s s s NORM GAMMA s 1. 1f 6 s e' s I s NA s ~
~
s
~ RCC GAMMA I 2 'E6 I 2.2E8 s 1 I 2 I TEST-SIM I YES s s OP. CODE: B NORM BETR I . NR s s s I NA s
s s
~ ACC BETA I 1.3E7 e I s s YES I s
s
~ ~ NEUTRON I N4 s 1 e s
I NA s SPRAY I NA I YES I NA I 2 I TEST SIM s NA ~ IACCURACY ~ s s s SUBMERGENCEs NA s NA I NA' NA I NA I NA I SPEC: +/-1. 2F NOTE 5 s s s s aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aa- a aaaa a a aaaa aaaaaaaaaa DEMO: +/-1 ~ 2F s s s
~ s I ZONE NO.: SC196113 s s s
ISUBMERGENCE: I es DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1.FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, I ISPRAY: s
~ ~
s 1. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. s s s
~ CRITERIA, EQEDC-1, REV 1, MAY 2s 1984. 2.NORMAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS sEQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO s ~
s s 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, . MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. I ISUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY ~
~ ~ ~ SDDF N IEEE-07-145-5003 B THRU G 3.OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FROM 30 le 3 ~ EQUIPMENT OPERRBILITY TIME DATA SHEET: DAYS TESTED VALUE TO 100 DAYS PLUS ~
s
~
s FILE NO.33-2-C8 MARGIN BY ANALYSIS. I DOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY ~
~ ~
s 4~ SWEC CALCULRTI ON NO. 12177-EQS-029 4.TERMINAL HEAD GASKET MUST BE REPLACED I IACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT Ils WITH A NEW GASKET WHENEVER HEAD COVER I s s s s s IS REMOVED, IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN s ~ s s
~ QUALIFICATION.
s ~
~
s s 5.F4CTORY CERTIFICATION TESTING OF RTD'S ~ s s
~ ~ ~ H4S DEMONSTR4TED ACCURACY OF (+/-1.0 FI s MAINT/SURVEILL s ~
e
~ THE QUALIFICATION TYPE TESTING HAS s
REFERENCE:
2 (NOTE 4) s SHOWN 4N RCCURACY OF +/-1 ' F.
~ s A REVIEW OF THE SETPOINT CALCULATIONS
<<QUALIFIED LIFE s ~ ~ ~ eI s HAS SHOWN THAT +/-1.2F IS AN
~ (YEARS): 40 II ACCEPTABLE ACCURACY.
s
REFERENCE:
2,4 II s s
~ s ~ s s s ~ s s s
NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE OF QUAL REF ¹ C041DAM li-Mar-85 aaaaaa aaaraaraa r = REV
-=- aaar ra araaaaaara rara rrraarr aarraaar aaaraaassraaraa ar rrraaraaaaraar raaaaaraaae ~ ~
s
~ ENVIRONMENTRL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION s s ~ ~
s DOCUMENT REFERENCE I s PARAMETER I SPECIFIED ~ QUALIFIED I QUAL IMARGINi REMARKS VALUE I VRLUE s SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED I METHOD I DEMO I IEQUIP NO.: 2CMS+TE53A s arr'r rara rrarar rara I aaaar arar s
', aarrarraal ,arrraaarrra raaaaaaaraa I I raarral ,raraarrrraraarra ISPEC NO.: C041D I OP. TIME: I NA I )100 DAYS I 3 2 I AN+DATA YES NOTE 3 sSYSTEM: CONTAINMENT I TEMP (F): I I I - s I -- I I
I - I I NOTE 1 s s MONITORING SYSTEM I NORMAL I 104/85 I 150 I 1 I 2,4 s TEST-SIM I NA I NOTE 2 s ABNORMALI 92 190 2,4 TEST-SIM NR I I ~ s 1 I I I s TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) RESISTANCE TEMPERRTURE DETECTOR (RTD) I I ACCIDENT I IPRESS(PSIG)l NORMAL I 175 0 25 WG I I I 400 ATMOS I I I 1 1 I I i 2 2 I I TEST-SIM I TEST-S M s I I
---I -NOTE YES NA I 1
s s ABNORMAL'0.25"WG I ATMOS s 1 ~ TEST-SIM I NA s IMANUFACTURER: PYCO ACCIDENT I 2 8 s 63 s 1 s 2 s TEST SIM I YES s
~ ~
s
~ s s s s
s NOTE 1 I MODEL NO.: 122-4030-04-2. 7- 82.3l e NORMAL I 50 I 100 I 1 I 2 I TEST-SIM I NA s ABNORMRL ~ 50 I 100 I 1 I 2 I TEST SIM ~ NA I s SAFETY FUNCTION: ACCIDENTs 100 i STEAM 1 2 I TEST-SIM NA s s s ~ s NA ~ RADIATION: I s s I is NOTE 1 s s NORM GAMMAI 6. 1E6 I s NA s ACC GAMMA s 5. 4E7 s 2. 2E8 e 1 I 2 I TEST-S I M s YES I s OP. CODE: B I NORM BETR I = NA 1 I NA s ACC BETA I 1.3E7 I 1 s I YES I NEUTRON s NA s 1 s NA IACCURRCY SPEC: +/-1 ~ 2F NOTE 5 ISPRAY ISUBMERGENCEI I NA NA iNA I s YES iNA I s NA I I 2 NA i I TEST-SIM NA s e saarraaarrrrararararrrrrraa raaraaaaaaaraararaaaaraaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaraaaaaaaaaararaaraaaaaaaaaaaa NA NA I DEMO: +/-1. 2F
'C1 s
s is I ZONE NO 96 1 16 s s I SUBMERGENCE: II DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1. FOR'OMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, I ISPRAY: eEQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO I I
- 1. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN CRITERIA, EQEDC-1, REV 1, MAY 2, 1984
- 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT,
'.NORMAL SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED.
MAX TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS DESIGN/AVERAGE. ISUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY s SDDF ¹ IEEE-07-145-5003 B THRU G 3.OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FROM 30 I s s 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TIME DATA SHEET: DAYS TESTED VALUE TO 100 DAYS PLUS FILE N0.33-2-C8 MARGIN BY ANALYSIS~ IDOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: 4. SWEC CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-029 4 ~ TERMINAL HEAD GASKET MUST BE REPLRCED IACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,C AT II WITH A NEW GASKET WHENEVER HEAD COVER s s IS REMOVED, IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN QUALIFICATION. 5.FRCTORY CERTIFICATION TESTING OF RTD'Sl HAS DEMONSTRATED ACCURACY OF (+/-1.0 Fl I MAINT/SURVE ILL THE QUALIFICATION TYPE TESTING HAS
REFERENCE:
2 (NOTE 4) SHOWN AN ACCURACY OF ~/-1.2 F. A REVIEW OF THE SETPOINT CALCULATIONS s s s I QUALIFIED LIFE HAS SHOWN THAT +/-1.2F IS AN s (YEARS): 40 s ACCEPTABLE ACCURACY.
REFERENCE:
2,4 ~ is
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
s ~
~ ~
i~ ~
~
s
~
is
NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF ¹ C041DAN REV 0 aaaaa aacsaazaaaaaaaz aaaaaaaaaaa Ii-Mar-85 ~ zcsz a zaaa aaz aa aaa aazazaaza zz zaaaaazzaazazaacsacsaaag I s ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION s I DOCUMENT REFERENCE s I ,csaaaaazcsaa csaaazzaaaaaaaaaaaaal I PAR4METER s SPECIFIED s QUALIFIED I I QU4L i MARGIN s REMARKS VALUE VALUE I SPECIFIED QUALIFIED I METHOD I DEMO I sEQUIP NO.: 2CMS+TE53B zaaaaaaaz s
'zazzzzzaazz'za s
azaa a 'a = s a'a aa -- alaaaaaaaa zai scaazsc'aaascaaazaaaaa aa', ISPEC NO.: C041D s OP TIME' NA s )100 DAYS I 3 ~ 2 ~ AN+DATA I YES s NOTE 3 s ISYSTEM: CONTAINMENT ~ TEMP (F) ~ I i I I I I NOTE 1 s s MONITORING SYSTEM s NORMAL s 104/85 I 150 s 1 ~ 2,4 iTEST-SIM s I NA I NOTE 2 ABNORMALI 92 I 190 I 1 I 2,4 I TEST-S IM s NA TEST-S I M I TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) RESISTANCE TEMPERATURE s ACCIDENT I IPRESS(PSIG) s 175
'e 400 I
i 1 I e 2 s s YES I
-e NOTE 1 DETECTOR (RTD) NORMAL s -0.25"WG s RTMOS s 1 2 e TEST-S I M s NA ii ABNORMALs -0.25"WG e ATMOS I 1 I 2 ei TEST-SIM e NA IMANUFACTURER: PYCO RCCIDENT ~ 2.8 s 63 s 1 I 2 I TEST-SIM s YES I IRH (/) s ~ ~
s
~ s s ~
s
~ NOTE 1
!MODEL NO.: 122-4030-04-2.7-82.3I I NORMAL I 50 s 100 I 1 s 2 s TEST-SIM I NA s s s s ABNORMALI 50 I 100 I 1 I 2 s TEST-SIM e NA s ISAFETY FUNCTION: ~ ACCIDENTs 100 ~ STERM s 1 ~ 2 s TEST-SIM I NA N4 'ADIATION ' ' s s s NOTE 1 s NORM GAMMAI 6. 1E6 I e I iNA l is I ACC GAMMA I 5.4E7 I 2.2E8 I 1 s 2 I TEST-S IM I YES IOP. CODE: B I NORM BETA I NA s s 1 I NA si s I ACC BETA I 1.3E7 I I 1 s s I YES e s s NEUTRON I NA s 1 s I NA e iSPRAY I NA I YES I NA I 2 TEST-S IM I NA e IRCCURACY I SPEC: +/-1. 2F NOTE 5 ISUBMERGENCEI
,a NR a
I aa z NA za = I z NA I NA a a N4 azaa z azaa I aaaaaaaaaaaa aaa NA ei s DEMO: +/-1. 2F s s e ZONE NO.: SC196116 ISUBMERGENCE: DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1 FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONSe I ISPRAY: s 1. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. CRI TER IR, EQEDC-I s REV 1 s MAY 2 s 1984. 2.NORMAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS
~ EQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. ~ SUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY SDDF ¹ IEEE-07-145-5003 B THRU G 3.0PERRBILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FROM 30 s
I 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TIME DATA SHEET: DAYS TESTED VALUE TO 100 DAYS PLUS s FILE N0.33-2-C8 MARGIN BY ANALYSIS~ I DOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: I 4. SWEC CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-029 4.TERMINAL HEAD GASKET MUST BE REPLACED IACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT i Il WITH A NEW GASKET WHENEVER HEAD COVER I IS REMOVED, IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN s QUALIFICATION. 5.FACTORY CERTIFICATION TESTING OF RTD'Sl i HAS DEMONSTRATED ACCURACY OF (+/ 1 ~0 F I s M4INT/SURVEILL- THE QUALIFICATION TYPE TESTING H4S
REFERENCE:
2 (NOTE 4) SHOWN AN ACCURACY OF +/-1 ~ 2 F. i A REVIEW OF THE SETPOINT CALCULATIONS
~ QUALIFIED LIFE HAS SHOWN THAT +/-1. 2F IS 4N (YEARS): 40 RCCEPTABLE ACCURACY.
I
REFERENCE:
2,4 ~ ~ s ~ I s s s s s
~ ~
s s s ~
NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1
¹ 13-Mar-85 QUAL REF aaa aaaa aaa C041DAO REV a aaaaaaaaaaacsciacsscscacscsaciaaaacs naaa aaaa aaanaaaaaaaaanaaaaa aaaa aaaacsaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaacsaacsaaaaa ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION l DOCUMENT R EFERENCE I PARAMETER l SPECIFIED li QUALIFIED I QUAL lMARGIN ~ REMARKS l VALUE I VALUE l SPECIFIED QUALIFIED l METHOD l DEMO I EQUIP NO.: 2CMS+TES3C aa acsa a I aaaaaaaascssla aaciaa cl asc aaa ~
aaaa ~ ~ aciaact ~ sca ciciaaaclaaaaasca I SPEC NO.: TIMEz >100 DAYS 3 2 AN+DATA YES NOTE 3 SYSTEM: C041D CONTAINMENT I OP. sTEMP (F) s NA l s I l -' l NOTE 1 MONITORING SYSTEM I l NORMAL l 104/85 \ 150 l 1 I 2,4 I TEST-SIM I NA s NOTE 2 I I l ABNORMALI 92 s 190 l 1 l 2,4 s TEST-SIM s NA I ACCIDENTI 175 400 2 TEST-SIM l YES i1 -' l I 1 I I s
'PRESS(PSIG) ' I I
e I - NOTE 1
-0.25"WG '3 TEST-SIM I
l NORMAL I l ATMOS I 1 2 l NA l ABNORMALl -0.25"WG is ATMOS s 2 I TEST-SIM I NA MANUFACTURER: PYCO ACCIDENTI 2.8 I l 1 I 2 l TEST SIM I YES i lRH (/): I I I NOTE 1 MODEL NO.: 122-4030-04-2.7-82.3s I NORMAL l 50 I 100 I 1 l 2 s TEST-S I M I NA I I ABNORMAL! 50 l 100 l 1 2 TEST-S I M l NA l SAFETY FUNCTION I I ACCIDENTI 100 l STEAM I 1 2 TEST-S I M NA
-l s s NA I I 'ADIATION NOTE 1 I
I NORM GAMMAI b. 1E6 s 1 I l NA I s ACC GAMMA I 5 4E7 I 2 2E8 ~ 1 2 s TEST-S I M s YES I NA l B I NORM BETA s NA l s 1 I I I I ACC BETA l 1.3E7 l I 1 YES I NA I l NEUTRON l NA ~ 1 s I TEST-S I M ACCURACY SPEC: +/-1.2F NOTE 5 I I lSPRAY ISUBMERGENCEI I ==-=- INA s NA s s YES NA s si
---------- aaaaaaaaaaaaascaaaaaaaaaaa NA NA l a'a 2
NA aa aaaa s I aaci NA I s NA NA a sc I I a claaa a a DEMO: +/-1. 2F I I I I I I ZONE NO.: SC196116 I I SUBMERGENCE: DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1.FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, s SPRAY: s 1 EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DES I G N SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. I CRITERIA, EQEDC-1, REV 1, MAY 2, 1984 ~ 2.NORMAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS EQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO 2~ VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. SUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY s SDDF ¹ IEEE-07-145-5003 B THRU G 3.OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FROM 30 I s 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TIME DATA SHEET: DAYS TESTED VALUE TO 100 DAYS PLUS I FILE NO.33-2-C8 MARGIN BY ANALYSIS~ DOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: s 4. SWEC CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-029 4. TERMINAL HEAD GASKET MUST BE REPLACED ACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588 s CAT II WITH A NEW GASKET WHENEVER HEAD COVER I IS REMOVED, IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN I QUALIFICATION. I I 5.FACTORY CERTIFICATION TESTING OF RTD'Sl HAS DEMONSTRATED ACCURACY OF (+/-I ~ 0 Fl MAINT/SURVEILL'- THE QUALIFICATION TYPE TESTING HAS
REFERENCE:
2 (NOTE 4) SHOWN AN ACCURACY OF +/-1.2 F. I A REVIEW OF THE SETPOINT CALCULATIONS QUALIFIED LIFE I HAS SHOWN THAT +/-1.2F IS AN I (YEARS): 40 ACCEPTABLE ACCURACY.
REFERENCE:
2.4
~ I I ~
I I
~ I s I ~ I I ~
I ~
NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1
¹ 13-Mar-85 QUAL REF aaaa aaaa C041DAP aa aaaa REV a aa- a aa aa a a a a a a a a a -- a aa aaaaaaaaaaaaa a aaaaaaaaaa ~ ~
s
~ ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION s ~ ~ ~
s
~ ~ ~ s DOCUMENT REFERENCE I PARAMETER s SPECIFIED QUALIFIED s QUAL l MARGIN l REMARKS iVALUE SPECIFIED QUALIFIED'METHOD l DEMO aa s s VALUE a--
s ~ s s sEQUIP NO.: 2CMS+TE53D s s ' aaaaa s s aaaa' aaa aa'aaaaaa'aaaaaaa sSPEC NO.: C041D sOP. TIME: s NA >100 DAYS 2 AN+DATA e YES l NOTE 3 lSYSTEM: CONTAINMENT lTEMP (F): s s s s NOTE 1 s MONITORING SYSTEM NORMAL s 104/85 s 150 2.4 s TEST-SIM s NA l NOTE 2 s ABNORMAL 92 l 190 2 4 s TEST-SIM s NA s TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) ACCIDENT I 175 l 400 2 TEST-SIM YES s ~ RESISTANCE TEMPERATURE l PRESS (PSIG) s s s s I s s s
- s ~
NOTE 1 DETECTOR (RTD) NORMAL s -0. 25 "WG ATMOS 2 s TEST-SIM e NA s ABNORMAL -0.25"WG iATMOS s 2 s TEST-SIM l NA lMANUFACTURER: PYCO ACCIDENT s 2.8 s 63 2 s TEST-SIM l YES
~ RH (%): s s
s s NOTE 1 sMODEL NO.: 122-4030-04-2.7-82 3>> I NORMAL 50 100 2 TEST-SIM s NA s s s ABNORMAL 50 s 100 2 e TEST-SIM e NA s lSAFETY FUNCTION: ACCIDENT 100 s STEAM 2 TEST-SIM l NA l BAD I AT ION: NOTE 1 s l NA s s s l NORM GAMMA 6. 1E6 1 s NA s s I ACC GAMMA 5. 4E7 2. 2EG 1 2 TEST-S I M s YES lOP. CODE: B l NORM BETA NA 1 I NA s I ACC BETA 1. 3E7 1 s e YES s s s NEUTRON NA 1 I NA s s lSPRAY NA YES NA 2 I TEST-S I M e NA l sACCURACY lSUBMERGENCE NA NA NA NA l NA l NA SPEC: +/-1. 2F NOTE 5 a a aaaa aaa aaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaa I s s DEMO: +/-I ~ 2F s s s s s s lZONE NO.: SC196116 s s eSUBMERGENCE: DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1 ~ FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS. s eiSPRAY: e 1. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. s CRITERIAe EQEDC-1 e REV 1, MAY 2 1984. 2-NORMAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS sEQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO I 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIF I CAT ION REPORT. MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. lSUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY SDDF ¹ IEEE-07-145-5003 B THRU G 3 ~ OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FROM 30 s I 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TIME DATA SHEET: DAYS TESTED VALUE TO 100 DAYS PLUS FILE NO ~ 33-2-C8 MARGIN BY ANALYSIS~ l DOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: s 4. SWEC CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-029 4 ~ TERMINAL HEAD GASkET MUST BE REPLACED lACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT s s WITH A NEW GASKET WHENEVER HEAD COVER s s s IS REMOVED, IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN QUALIFICATION. s
- 5. FACTORY CERTIFICATION TESTING OF RTD'S ~
HAS DEMONSTRATED ACCURACY OF <+/-I ~ 0 Fs I MAI NT/SURVE ILL s THE QUALIFICATION TYPE TESTING HAS
REFERENCE:
-2 (NOTE 4) s s SHOWN AN ACCURACY OF +/-1 ' F~
A REVIEW OF THE SETPOINT CALCULATIONS
! QUALIFIED LIFE s s HAS SHOWN THAT +/-1 'F IS AN (YEARS): 40 s ACCEPTABLE ACCURACY.
REFERENCE:
2e4 ~
~
s s s ~
~ s ~ s s s s s s s s
s i
~
NINE NILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUNBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALURTION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF tf C041DAQ REV 25-Nar-85 aaaa --- a aaa aaaa a -=-----aa aaaaaa aaa a a a aaaaaaa -- -- ----- aaaaaaaaaaa aa aaaaaaa aaaa ENVIRONNENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EGUIPHENT DESCRIPTION ~ s
~ ~
I DOCUMENT REFERENCE I aa a aaa'aaaaaa a I PARAMETER I SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED I QUAL sNARGINI REMARKS VALUE SPECIFIED QUALIFIED IEQUIP NO.: 2CNS+TE54A aa a'-aa I VALUE
----a'a s -a-aaa I
a a -aa ' s METHOD a a' s DEMO I aia a NA,
~ ~
sSPEC NO.: C041D tOP. TINE: 's I )100 DAYS I 3 I 2 AN+DATA I YES I NOTE 3 siSYSTEM: CONTR I NMEloIT 'TEMP (F) -s NOTE '1 s MONITORINB SYSTEM I'IORHAL i 104/85 t 150 I 1 I 2,4 s TEST-S I I'1 sNA l s NOTE 2 s s ABNORNALs 'so2 I 190 I 1 I 2,4 s TEST-SIN I NA I t TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) I ACCIDENTI 175 I 400 s 1 s 2 TEST-SIN I YES s RESISTANCE TEMPERATURE 'PRESS(PSIG) ' NOTE 1 DETECTOR (RTD) NORNAL s -0.25"WG I RTNOS s 1 TEST SIN ~ NA s s ABNORNRLs -0.25"WG s ATMOS s 1 I 2 TEST-S I M s NA si INANUFACTURER: PYCO s ACCIDENT s 2. 8 I 63 o 1 s TEST-SIN t YES I
~ hara '!Il s,r z ~
s- s s s s i s s NOTE 1 sHODEL NO.: 122-4030-04-2. /-8 ~ 4 s
~ I NORMAL I 50 s 100 I 1 s 2 s TEST SIH s NA ~
s ABNQRMALs 50 I 100 I 1 s TEST-S IM t NA s s SAFETY FUNCT1ON: I ACCIDENT i 100 s STEAN t 1 I 2 TEST-SIN I NA NA 'RADIATION I ' ' I s s
~ s s NOTE 1 s
s I NORN GAN! IA I 6 1E6 1 NA i s s ACC GAMMA I 5.4E7 I 2.2E8 I 1 I 2 I TEST-SIN I YES I I OP. CODE: B I NORM BETA I NA I
~
1 o I NA I I s ACC BETA s 1.3E7 1 s YES s N~U ROM NA i I NA s s ISPRAY I NA I YES I NA I 2 s TEST-S IN I NA s sACCURACY sSUBNERBENCEI NA i NA s NA t NA NA ~ NA I SPEC: +/-1.2F NOTE 5 i s s DEMO: +/-1.2F s o oZONE NO. z SC196116 s ISUBNERGENCE: DOCUNENT,
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1.FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONNENTAL CONDITIONS, I ISPRAY: I 1. EGUIPNFNT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTRL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUNENT REFERENCED. CRITERIA'GEDC-I o REV 1, MAY 2t I'F84 ~ 2.NORMAL TENPFRATL!RES RRE SHOW!N AS iiEQUIPHENT NOT SUBJECT TO 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, NAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. ~ SUBNERGENCE OR SPRAY ~ SDDF ft IEEF 07 145 5003 B THRU G 3.OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FROM 30 s
- 3. EQUIPsitENT OPERABILITY TINE DATA SHEET: DAYS TESTED VALUE TO 100 DAYS PLUS s FILE NO. 33-2-CB HARBIN BY ANALYSIS.
I DOCUNENTATION ACCEPTABIL IT Y: I s 4. SWEC CALCULRTI ON NO. 12177-EQS-029 4.TERNINRL HEAD GASKET MUST BE REPLACED
~
s ACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,C AT II WITH A NEW GASKET WHENEVER HEAD COVER s IS RENOVED, IN ORDER TO tlAINTAIN s QUALIFICATION-s s 5.FACTORY CERTIFICATION TESTING OF RTD'Sl s
' HAS DEI1QNSTRRTED ACCURACY OF (+/-1.0 Ft t MAINT/SURVEILL THE QUALIFICATION TYPE TESTING HAS
REFERENCE:
2 (NOTE 4) SHOWN AN ACCURACY OF +/-1.2 F. s A RFVIEW OF THE SETPOINT CALCULATIONS I QUALIFIED LIFE s HAS SHOWN THRT +/-1.2F IS AN o (YEARS): 40 s ACCEPTABLE ACCURACY. I
REFERENCE:
2,4 s
~ ~ ,~ o s ~
s ~ s s s s s s s s
NINE MILE POINT DOCKET NUMBER
- UNIT 2 50-410 0
SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF ¹ ---- C041DAR REV 13-Mar-85 ~ caacaaaca aaacac ca a accaaccacaaccac aa aa a a a a caaca c acaaacacacaacc aca aa aa a
~
s
~ ~ ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ~
s
~ ~ =-=-
DOCUMENT REFERENCE aaa s e acaacccccaa ac l I PARAMETER s SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED ~ QUAL ~ MARGIN ~ REMARKS ac VALUE VALUE SPECIFIED QUALIFIED l
~ ~
I s l METHOD e DEMO l sEQUIP NO.: ~
~ ~ ~
e s c eric cca e s ccccc a cc ca s c ~ ccicaac s s l SPEC NO.: l lOP. TIME: s )100 DAYS AN+DATA YES NOTE 3 siSYSTEM: l siTEMP <F): l s s s NOTE 1 ll NORMAL s 104/85 s 150 2,4 s TEST-S IM NA s NOTE 2 ABNORMALs 92 s 190 2.4 l TEST-S I M NA I I TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) s s ACCIDENT l 175 400 2 TEST-SIM YES l RESISTANCE TEMPERATURE I s PRESS (PS I G) s s s l NOTE 1 DETECTOR (RTD) sl NORMAL s -0.25"WG ATMOS 2 l TEST-SIM NA I s ~ ~ ABNORMALs -0.25"WG ATMOS 2 TEST-SIM NA s lMANUFACTURER: PYCO ss ACCIDENTsi 2.8 s 63 2 TEST-S IM YES seRH <%): s s s s NOTE 1 sMODEL NO.: 122-4030-04-2. 7-82.3 ss NORMAL s 50 l 100 2 TEST-SIM NA ss ABNORMALs 50 s 100 2 s TEST-SIM NA s lSAFETY FUNCTION: ss ACCIDENTS 100 s STEAM 2 s TEST-SIM NA s iNA s s sRADIATION: l s s s s s NOTE 1 ss NORM GAMMAI 6. 1E6 1 l NA s s sl ACC GAMMA 5 ~ 4E7 2. 2EG 1 TEST-8IM I YES s lOP. CODE: B sl NORI'1 BETA s NA 1 l NA s ss ACC BETA I 1 ~ 3E7 1 l YES ss NEUTRON ~ NA 1 s s NA s esSPRAY s NA YES NA 2 s TEST-S IM l NA (ACCURACY lsSUBMERGENCEI NA NA NA NA NA l NA SPEC: +/-1.2F NOTE 5 cca aaa a caaa a a a caa a c a ccaaaccaac l DEMO: +/-1. 2F ~
~ ~ ~
s s
~ ~
s ~ l ZONE NO.: SC196116 ~
~
s
~
s s eSUBMERGENCE: DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1 ~ FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, s sSPRAY: l ~ 1 EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. CRITERIA~ EQEDC-1~ REV 1, MAY 2, 1984. 2.NORMAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS eEQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO l s 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL OUALIFICATION REPORT. MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE lSUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY SDDF ¹ IEEE-07-145-5003 B THRU G 3.OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FROM 30 s s s s 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TIME DATA SHEET: DAYS TESTED VALUE TO 100 DAYS PLUS FILE NO.33-2-C8 MARGIN BY ANALYSIS. l DOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: s s 4. SWEC CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-029 4.TERMINAL HEAD GASKET MUST BE REPLACED IACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT I ~ s
~
s WITH A NEW GASKET WHENEVER HEAD COVER
~
s s
~ IS REMOVED, IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN ~ ~ ~ ~ QUALIFICATION.
s ~
~
s
~ 5.FACTORY CERTIFICATION TESTING OF RTD'S ~
s ~ HAS DEMONSTRATED ACCURACY OF (+/-1.0 Fs ILL-s s l MA INT/SURVE ~ s s
~ THE QUALIFICATION TYPE TESTING HAS ~/-1.2 ACCURACY'ac
REFERENCE:
2 (NOTE 4) s
~ ~ ~ SHOWN AN ACCURACY OF F.
s s
~
s
~ A REVIEW OF THE SETPOINT CALCULATIONS lQUALIFIED LIFE s ~
s s HAS SHOWN THAT +/-1.2F IS AN (YEARS): 40 s
~
s s ACCEPTABLE
REFERENCE:
2~4 s
~ ~
s s ~ s ~ s s s s e s s ~ s ~ s s
0 NINE MILE POINT - UNIT 2 DOCKET NUNBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF lI C041DAS REV 13-Nar-85 aaaaaaa cise aaaaaaa a s s ENVIRONNENTAL CONDITIONS AND QU4LIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION DOCUNENT REFERENCE saaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa s PARANETER SPECIFIED s QUALIFIED I s QUAL I MARGIN I REMARKS VALUE SPECIFIED QUALIFIED a-- -a-I VALUE s 's NETHOD DEMO IEQUIP NO.: 2CNS+TE54C ,'a aaaaccaaaala ~ ' s
' aaaacsaaaa s s aa s s
sSPEC NO.: C041D s OP. TINE: I I )100 DAYS I 3 AN+DATA s YES I NOTE 3 ISYSTEN: CONTR INNENT sTEMP (F): s ~ s s s s s s s s s NOTE 1 MONITORING SYSTEN I NORNAL s 104/85 150 s 1 2 s TEST-SIN s NA s NOTE 2 s I RBNORMALs 92 s 190 I 1 I 2,4 s TEST-SIM ss NA I I TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) I ACCIDENT I 175 400 s 1 2 s TEST-SIN YES s RESISTANCE TEMPERATURE I PRESS (PSI8) I s I ~ s
~ NOTE 1 DETECTOR (RTD) NORMAL -0.25"WG ATNOS 1 2 I TEST-SIN I NA I s iABNORMALs -0.25"WG s ATMOS 1 s
2 I TEST-S IN s NA s sNANUFACTURER: PYCO I ACCIDENT I 2.8 63 1 2 I TEST-SIN s YES I s sRH (%): s s NOTE INODEL NO ~ 122 4030 04 2 ' 82 's NORMAL s 50 50 100 1 s 2 s TEST-SIN TEST-SIN I I NA s 1 s s I ABNORMALI 100 1 s 2 I NA si ISAFETY FUNCTION: 4CCI DENT I 100 STERN 1 s 2 I TEST-S IN NA NA s R4DIAT ION: s s s s s s s
~ ~ NOTE 1 s NORN GAMMAs 6. 1E6 1 I I NA I s ACC GANMA s 5. 4E7 2.2EG 1 TEST-SIN s YES s IOP. CODE: s NORM BETR NA 1 I NA s s ACC BETA 1. 3E7 1 ss I YES s I NEUTRON s NA 1 s NA I ISPRAY NA YES NA i'A 2 TEST-SIM I NA sACCURACY SPEC: +/-1. 2F NOTE 5 ISUBMERGENCEs s
a-a a a a NA
-aaaccaaaaccaa NA aa =--
s aaaaaaaaaaaaa NA a a --NA-a aaa I NA aa ss DENO: +/-1. 2F s s s s s I ZONE NO.: SC196116 s s ISUBNERGENCE: s DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1. FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, I sSPRAY: I 1. EQUIPNENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONNENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. CRITERIR, EQEDC-i, REV 1, MAY 2. 1984. 2.NORMAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS sEQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO s 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QU4LIFICRTION REPORT, NAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. ISUBNERGENCE OR SPRAY SDDF II IEEE-07-145-5003 B THRU G 3.OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FROM 30 I 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TINE DATA SHEET: DAYS TESTED VALUE TO 100 DAYS PLUS s FILE NO ~ 33-2-C8 NARGIN BY ANALYSIS. I I DOCUNENTAT ON RCCEPTAB ILI TY: s 4. SWEC CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-029 4.TERMINAL HERD GRSKET NUST BE REPLACED sACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588cCAT III WITH A NEW GASKET WHENEVER HEAD COVER s IS RENOVEDc IN ORDER TO I'IAINTAIN QUALIFICATION. 5.FACTORY CERTIFICATION TESTING OF RTD'Sl s s HAS DENONSTR4TED ACCURACY OF <+/-1 ~ 0 Fs s s I MAINT/SURVEILL- THE QUALIFICATION TYPE TESTING HAS
REFERENCE:
2 (NOTE 4) SHOWN AN ACCURACY OF +/-1 ' F. A REVIEW OF THE SETPOINT CALCULATIONS I QUALIFIED LIFE HAS- SHOWN THAT +/-1.2F IS AN (YEARS): 40 ACCEPTABLE ACCURACY. s
REFERENCE:
2,4 s ~ s ~
~ ~ ~ s s s s ~
NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF ¹ C041DAT REV 13-Mar-85 c ac a cc c c ccc ss caaac cc aa acaca ca csea ac a a ccc ccc a aaaaaaaaaaacacac I ~ I I ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION
~ I EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ~ I
'caccaca a == ceca aacaaca aaa PARAMETER I SPECIFIED ~ QUALIFIED I l DOCUMENT REFERENCE s l QUAL I MARGIN I REMARKS
~ ~ VALUE l VALUE l SPECIFIED QUALIFIED METHOD DEMO l lEQUIP NO.: 2CMS+TE54D C I aaaaaaaaaa, aC ---==-- Caaaaaaaaaa, ~
aac CCC CC,
~
aaaa
~
C Caa aaa
~ ~ ~ I ~
ISPEC NO.: ISYSTEM: I C041D CONTAINMENT MONITORING SYSTEM s I l OP TIME leTEMP(F):s----- I NORMAL I
~ NA 104/85 I
I
) 100 DAYS l
150
~
l I 3 1 s I l 2 2, 4
~
I I
-- ---I -NOTE AN+DATA TEST-S I M ~
l s YES NA s l NOTE 3 NOTE 2 1 I s ABNORMALI 92 l 190 l 1 's 2,4 l TEST-SI M s NA I l TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) ACCIDENT l 175 I 400 2 l TEST-SIM YES s
----- I -----1 I -- I - - -l -
s RESISTANCE TEMPERATURE l IPRESS(PSIG) l I l ~ I - I NOTE l DETECTOR (RTD) l I NORMAL l -0.25 "WG l ATMOS I 1 I 2 l TEST-SIM l NA I ABNORMAL( -0.25" WG I ATMOS l 1 l 2 l TEST-SIM I NA I lMANUFACTURER: PYCO ACCIDENTl I 2.8 s 63 l 1 l 2 I TEST-SIM l YES l I I&A 'LAI ~ ~ I I I I I I I I I I I NOTE 1 (MODEL NO.: 122-4030-04-2.7-82.3 Il NORMAL l 50 l 100 1 2 l TEST-SIM I NA ll s s I ABNQRMALI 50 s 100 1 l 2 s TEST-SIM I NA s ~ SAFETY FUNCTION'A ss ACCIDENTI 100 l STEAM l 1 l 2 l TEST-SIM I NA l
' RADIATION I
s NOTE 1 I NORM GAMMAl 6. 1E6 s 1 l I l NA I s l ACC GAMMA s 5. 4E7 I 2. 2E8 l 1 2 I TEST-SIM ~ YES IOP. CODE! B ~ l NORM BETA s NA NA ACC BETA l 1.3E7 ~ 1 s YES l II NEUTRON I NA I I 1 I NA I lsSPRAY I NA l YES I NA s 2 s TEST-SIM I NA sACCURACY SPEC: +/-1 2F
~ NOTE 5 slSUBMERGENCEI slac a ---= NA ac-l a
NA a-ccac -a I a c-NA I cacc-acacaac NA l NA I NA
-c--a- -a-- ~
DEMO: +/-1.2F I
~ ~ ~ ~
I ZONE NO.: SC196116 i( lSUBMERGENCE: ~ s DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES'.FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS' lSPRAY: lsl l. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. I I CRITERIA, EQEDC-1, REV 1, MAY 2, 1984. 2.NORMAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS lEQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO l I 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORTs MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. lSUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY el SDDF ¹ IEEF-07-145-5003 B THRU G 3.OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FROM 30 I l I 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TIME DATA SHEET: DAYS TESTED VALUE TO 100 DAYS PLUS FILE NO. 33-2-C8 MARGIN BY ANALYSIS. I DOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: sl 4. SWEC CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-029 4.TERMINAL HEAD GASKET MUST BE REPLACED IACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT I WITH A NEW GASKET WHENEVER HEAD COVER IS REMOVED, IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN I I I QUALIFICATION. I I I ~ 5.FACTORY CERTIFICATION TESTING OF RTD'Sl I HAS DEMONSTRATED ACCURACY OF <+/-1.0 Fl l MAINT/SURVE ILL THE QUALIFICATION TYPE TESTING HAS l REFERENCE 2 (NOTE 4) SHOWN AN ACCURACY OF ~/-1.2 F. l s A REVIEW OF THE SETPOINT CALCULATIONS I lQUALIFIED LIFE HAS SHOWN THAT +/-1 ~ 2F IS AN l (YEARS)! 40 ~ ~ ACCEPTABLE ACCURACY'
REFERENCE:
2.,4 I I I I I ~
~ ~
I ~ I ~ I I
~ ~
I NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF ll C041DAU REV 13-Mar-85 aaraaaara----- a-- raaaaaa aaaaaaaraaaaaaaaaraaaaaaaaraaaaraaaaaaaaaaaaaraaaaaraaaaaaaaaraaaaarrraaaaaarrarrrraaraaaaaraaarar; s s
~ ~ ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ~
s
~ ~
DOCUMENT REF ERENCE ee ra s s PARAMETER s SPECIFIED l QUALIFIED I QUAL l MARG IN l REMARKS lEQUIP NO.:
~ ~
I
~
a aa I rara l rara VALUE aaa l ee -----------ea VALUE l SPECIFIED e ra aa l QUALIFIED a aaraaa a a l ee METHOD l DEMO s e aaaaasraaaraaaaaaaaaaal (SPEC NO.: l l OP. TIME: s NA s >100 DAYS s 3 2 AN+DATA l YES s NOTE 3 lSYSTEM: 'TEMP (F) NOTE 1 ls NORMAL l 104/85 s 150 1 2,4 TEST SIM l NA NOTE 2 ll ABNORMALI 92 e ~ e s s 190 l 1 2,4 TEST-SIM I NA l TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) ll ACCIDENTs 175 400 l 2 TEST SIM l YES RESISTANCE TEMPERATURE I IPRESS(PSIG) l l s l 1
~ -- s -s NOTE 1 ll NORMAL -0.25"WG s
DETECTOR (RTD) s s ATMOS s 1 s 2 ~ TEST SI M l NA ABNORMALl -0.25"WG l ATMOS l 1 2 s TEST-S I M l NA IMANUFACTURER: PYCO l 'CCIDENT l 2 8
~ s 63 ~ 1 s 2 l TEST-S I M ~ YES l sRH (%): ~ ~ s ~ ~
s s s
~
NOTE 1 lMODEL NO.: 122-4030-04-2.7-82.3 sl 50 100 ' NORMAL l l l s 2 s TEST SIM ~ NA s Il ABNORMALl 50 100 s 1 l 2 l TEST-S I M s NA sSAFETY FUNCTION: ss ACCIDENTs 100 l STEAM s 1 2 s TEST-SI M e NA l
'RADIATION I
l s NA e ss s NORM GAMMAs ACC GAMMA s e6.5.4E7 1E6 s l 2.2E8 s 1 s s TEST-S I M s s NA s s I NOTE 1 s l 1 s I YES lOP. CODEz B ls NORM BETA s NA l 1 s NA ss s s s ss ACC BETA s 1.3E7 e 1 YES l s se NEUTRON s NA s 1 NA s s s ssSPRAY s NA YES ~ NA l ~ TEST-S I M l NA I IACCURACY ssSUBMERGENCEl NA NA NA l NA l NA l l SPEC: +/-1. 2F NOTE 5 llaaa a a aa aa a s
---- s aaaaaa a aa DEMO: +/-1 ~ 2F ~ ~
s s
~ s s ~
l ZONE NO.: SC196116 ~
~
s s lSUBMERGENCE: ss DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
N OTES: 1 ~ FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, l lSPRAY: I s 1. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. s s l CRITERIA, EQEDC-1, REV 1, MAY 2, 1984. 2.NORMAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS eEQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO s l 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT. MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. sSUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY SDDF ll IEEE-07-145-5003 B THRU G 3. OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FROM 30 s l s 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TIME DATA SHEET: DAYS TESTED VALUE TO 100 DAYS PLUS s s FILE NO. 33-2-C8 MARGIN BY ANALYSIS. s DOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: s s 4. SWEC CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-029 4 TERMINAL HEAD GASKET MUST BE REPLACED
~
lACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT s I s s s s WITH A NEW GASKET WHENEVER HEAD COVER s s s s s IS REMOVED. IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN s s ~ QUALIFICATION. s
~
s
~ 5.FACTORY CERTIFICATION TESTING OF RTD'Sl HAS DEMONSTRATED ACCURACY OF <+/-1.0 FI ~ s s ~ s I MAINT/SURVE ILL s ~
s
~ THE QUALIFICATION TYPE TESTING HAS
REFERENCE:
2 (NOTE 4) s l SHOWN AN ACCURACY OF +/-1 2 F ~ ~ s A REVIEW OF THE SETPOINT CALCULATIONS QUALIFIED LIFE s s l l HAS SHOWN THAT +/-1. 2F IS AN (YEARS): 40 s
~
s s ACCEPTABLE ACCURACY. ~
REFERENCE:
2,4 ~ s s s s s
~ s s s ~ ~
s s
~ s ~ ~
s ~
NINE NILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUNBER 50-410 SYSTEN COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF II C041DAV REV 13-Nar-85 aacacaraz a aa aca aa c a ccaaaaaaaaczrcc c ccc ccccaaaaca ca ENVIRONNENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPNENT DESCRIPTION e e e e I DOCUNENT REFERENCE I s PARANETER I SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED I s QUAL sNARGINI REMARKS , I I IEQUIP NO.: 2CNS+TESSB VALUE I VALUE s SPECIFIED zcaaac DrsaaaaDazsrlc I QUALIFIED s caacaacaaaal ,aca -=- NETHOD s DENO s crace cc aaaaaaaaczczz
-----s----- ----- -----
e ~ s I ~ ~ s ISPEC NO.: TINE' )100 3 2 AN+DATA YES NOTE 3 ISYSTEN: C041D CONTAINNENT
~ OP iiTENP(F): I NA ~ DAYS ~
I
~
I
~
I ---es---s-NOTE s s 1 MONITORING SYSTEM I NORMAL s 104/85 e 150 I 1 I 2 4 e I TEST SIM s NA ~ NOTE 2 e e ~ ABNORMAL s 92 s 190 I 1 I 2 4 e I TEST SIN ~ NA TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) ACCIDENT I 175 400 1 I 2 I TEST-SIN YES ~ s RESISTANCE TEMPERATURE s sPRESS(PSIG) I -- - s s s I I s e
~ -s NOTE 1 DETECTOR (RTD) I NORNAL s -0. 25 "WG s ATNOS s 1 s 2 s TEST-SIN I NA s ABNORMALI -0.25"WG I ATNOS s 1 I 2 is TEST-SIN s NA sNANUFACTURER: PYCO e ACCIDENT s 2. 8 s 63 s 1 I 2 s TEST-SIM s YES e
e 'RH e (/ i e e s NOTE 1 sNODEL NO.: 122-4030-04-2.7-82.3I I NORMAL I 50 s 100 s 1 I 2 e TEST-SIM e NA I ABNORNALI 50 s 100 I 1 I 2 ~ TEST SIM ~ NA ISAFETY FUNCTION: I ACCIDENTs 100 ~ STERN ~ 1 e 2 I TEST SIN I NA NA I RADIATION I I I I I s NOTE 1 iNA ~ s e NORM GAMMA ~ 6. 1E6 1 l I e e s ACC GANNA s S.4E7 I 2.2E8 s 1 e 2 I TEST-SIN e YES IOP. CODE: B ~ NORN BETA ~ ~ NA ~ 1 I NA e I ACC BETA I 1.3E7 s 1 NEUTRON s NA e 1 e e s NA I e eSPRAY ~ NA ~ YES ~ NA I 2 ~ TEST SIN ~ NA eRCCUR4CY SPEC: +/-1. 2F NOTE S
~ SUBMERGENCEs NA a aaaaaaaaaaccarcar ==-
s
---=
NA ~ NA Daaaacacaa i z-N4 aaaca I araaa NA Da I NA rraaaaaaaaaaaa aaaarca DENO: +/-1. 2F e e s ZONE NO.: SC196116 e e e ISUBNERGENCE: DOCUNENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1.FOR CONPLETE ENVIRONNENTRL CONDITIONS, I sSPRAY: s l. EQUIPNENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. CRITERIRe EQEDC 1 e REV 1 e NAY 2e 1984 2.NORNAL TENPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS eEQUIPNENT NOT SUBJECT TO s 2. VENDOR ENVIRONNENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. sSUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY SDDF II IEEE-07-145-5003 B THRU G 3. OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FROM 30 e e s 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TINE DATA SHEET: DAYS TESTED VALUE TO 100 DAYS PLUS e FILE NO ~ 33-2-C8 MARGIN BY ANALYSIS. I DOCUNENTAT ION ACCEPTABILITY: e 4. SWEC CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-029 4.TERNINAL HEAD GASKET NUST BE REPLACED sACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT II WITH A NEW GASKET WHENEVER HEAD COVER IS RENOVED, IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN e QUALIFICATION. e 5.FACTORY CERTIFIC4TION TESTING OF RTD'Sl e HAS DEMONSTRATED 4CCURACY OF (+/-1.0 Fs s NAINT/SURVEILL- THE QUALIFICATION TYPE TESTING HAS
REFERENCE:
2 (NOTE 4) SHOWN AN ACCURACY OF ~/-1.2 F. A REVIEW OF THE SETPOINT CALCULATIONS s I QU4LIFIED LIFE HAS SHOWN THAT +/-1.2F IS 4N (YEARS): 40 ACCEPTABLE ACCURACY.
REFERENCE:
2,4 e e e e s e
NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF arear ¹ C041DAW
= aaacrrcraraaa REV ccrc rrc rc a aaa a x x xrcacs r a acr aa rra r a a a arrear 13-Mar-85 s ~
s s ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION I EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION I DOCUMENT REFERENCE rrrrxrcrra' s s s aa serac c PARAMETER I SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED iMARG IN REMARKS
'ALUE
~ s s s rxaacrrrrsaaarrarraar QUALIFIED s a---a-c -- SPECIFIED s VALUE I I I DEMO IEQUIP NO.: 2CMS+TESSC ~ ~ ~ aa-rrcaax'ccrarassraaa ',arrear Caccrrr
~ CC rr a s sSPEC NO.: C041D ~ OP. TIME: s NA I )100 DAYS I 3 s 2 I YES I NOTE 3 lSYSTEM: CONTAINMENT 'TEMP (F) s s
s s s NOTE 1 MONITORING SYSTEM NORMAL s 104/85 I 150 I 1 s 2,4 I NA s NOTE 2 s s ABNORMALI 92 s 190 s 1 I 2,4 NA I TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) s ACCIDENTI 175 s 400 I 1 I 2 I YES RESISTANCE TEMPERATURE IPRESS(PSIG) s s NOTE DETECTOR (RTD) s s ii NORMAL I -0.25"WG I ATMOS 's 1 2 s NA s I 4BNORM4Lsi -0.2S"WG s ATMOS s 1 2 I NA ~ MANUFACTURER PYCO I s ACCIDENT s 2 8 s 63 ~ 1 2 YES s s iRH (%): s
~ s ~ ~
s s s NOTE 1 sMODEL NO.: 122-4030-04-2.7-82 ~ 3I s NORMAL s 50 s 100 s 1 2 NA s s s ABNORMALI 50 s 100 s 1 2 I NA ISAFETY FUNCTION: ACCIDENTI 100 s STEAM I 1 s 2 I NA I NA s RADIATION ' I s s s NOTE 1 e I NORM GAMMAI 6. 1E6 I s 1 s NA s s s 4CC GAMMA e 5.4E7 I 2.2E8 I 1 s 2 YES IOP. CODE: B NORM BETA I NA I s 1 s I NA s I ACC BETA s 1.3E7 I 1 I I YES s s NEUTRON I NA s s 1 s s NA s s ISPRAY s NA I YES I NA 2 I NA sACCURACY sSUBMERGENCEs NA I NA I NA s NA I NA SPEC: +/-1 ~ 2F NOTE 5 Iarracaaaarrrrcccar == araacrra aaaacrxraaaraaarraaaaaacraa crrrrar acrcc r ccrc s DEMO: +/-1. 2F s s ABNORMAL sZONE NO.: s SC196116 s sSUBMERGENCE: DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1 ~ FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, siSPRAY: 1. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIG N SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. I CRITERIA, EQEDC-1, REV 1, MAY 2, 1984. 2 TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN 4S sEQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO s 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. ISUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY SDDF ¹ IEEE-07-14S-S003 B THRU G 3.OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FROM 30
- 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TII'IE DATA SHEET: D4YS TESTED VALUE TO 100 DAYS PLUS s
FILE N0.33-2-C8 MARGIN BY ANALYSIS. s DOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: I 4. SWEC CALCUL4TION NO. 12177-EQS-029 4 ~ TERMINAL HEAD G4SKET MUST BE REPLACED IACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT s s WITH A NEW GASKET WHENEVER HEAD COVER s s IS REMOVED, IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN s s s QUALIFICATION. s 5.FACTORY CERTIFICATION TESTING OF RTD'S s s HAS DEMONSTRATED ACCURACY OF <+/-1 ' F s MAINT/SURVEILL s THE QUALIFICATION TYPE TESTING HAS
REFERENCE:
2 (NOTE 4) s s SHOWN AN ACCURACY OF +/-1.2 F. 4 REVIEW OF THE SETPOINT CALCULATIONS ~ QUALIFIED LIFE s HAS SHOWN THAT +/-1 2F IS AN (YEARS): 40 ACCEPTABLE ACCUR4CY-s
REFERENCE:
2.4
~ ~ ~ s s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
s ~ s ~
NINE NILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUNBER 50-410 SYSTEM CONPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF QUAL REF ¹ C041D4X REV 1 13-Nar-85 araaaaraaaaaaaaaaaaaa a ========= aaraaaaaaaaaaaraaaaraaaaaaaaaraaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaraaaaaaa raaaaaaaaraaaaaaaaa aaaaaraaaaaaaarra
~ ~ ~ ~ ENVIRONNENTAL CONDITIONS RND QUALIFIC4TION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION s s ~ ~ ~ a == arcs aaaa I PARANETER s SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED s
s DOCUNENT REFERENCE I QUAL s NARGIN s REMARKS IEQUIP NO.: 2CMS+TE55D aaaaa aa VRLUE s VALUE ara aaaraaaa I SPECIFIED
'rraaascaaaa I QUALIFIED rara 'aaNETHOD e
aaaa a' I DENO I
'aaaaaaaaacsa ----- ---- '-----'-----'-----'---'-.NOTE e ~ e e
scsccsa I SPEC NO: C041D (OP. TIMEt I NA s >100 DAYS I 3 I 2 s AN+DATA I YES s NOTE s SYSTEN: CONTAINMENT sTEMP(F) I I s s s s s 1 NONITORING SYSTEM ~ NORNAL ~ 104/85 s 150 s 1 ~ 2e4 ~ TEST SIN s NA I NOTE 2 s I TYPE: <DESCRIPTION) s ABNORMALI 92 I I oe0 e 1 I 24 I TESTSIN I NA ACCIDENT s 175 s 400 s 1 ~ 2 s TEST SIM I YES RESIST4NCE TENPERATURE I PRESS(PSIG) I I I s I NOTE 1 25'G s s DETECTOR (RTD) ~ NORMAL I 0 I ATMOS I 1 ~ 2 I TEST SIN I NA ~ s s ~ ABNORNALs -0.25"WG I ATNOS I 1 I 2 I TEST-SIM I NA s sMANUFACTURER: PYCO s ACCIDENT s 2. 8 I 63 s 1 I 2 I TEST-SIN YES (/) s e s IRH ~ ~ s s NOTE 1 NO.: 122-4030-04-2. 7-82 ~ 3 s I MODEL NORNAL I 50 100
~ I s s 1 I 2 I TEST-SIN s NA s ABNORNALI 50 e 100 I 1 I 2 e TEST-SIN I NA s sSAFETY FUNCTION: I ACCIDENT 100 I STEAN 2 TEST-SIN s s 1 I I NA NA I RADIRT ION: I s l I I o
I I - s s NOTE 1 s s s NORN GANNA e b. 1E6 s 1 e I NA I s s s ACC GANMA I 5.4E7 s 2.2EB s 1 s 2 e TEST-SIN I YES sOP. CODE: B I NORN BETR s NA I 1 s s ACC BETA s 1.3E7 1 s I s YES I NEUTRON I NA I I 1 e I ~ NA I s s sSPRAY ~ NA s YES I NA s 2 ~ TEST SIM I NA sRCCURRCY sSUBNERGENCEI NA NA NA NA s I NR NA SPEC: +/-1. 2F NOTE 5 ,aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaacsaaaaaaraaraaaaara s s aa arcsraaaraaaacsaaaraaraarraaraaaaaa s ~ aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa-' s DEMO: +/-1 ~ 2F s s ZONE NO ~ . SC1 oe6116 ssSUBNERGENCE: ss DOCUNENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES- 1-FOR CONPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONSel ISPRAY: s e l. EQUIPNENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONNENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUNENT REFERENCED. s s CRITERIA, EQEDC-1, REV 1 e NAY 2, los'84 ~ 2.NORMAL TENPERATURES ARE SHOWN RS IEQUIPNENT NOT SUBJECT TO s 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, NAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. ISUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY I SDDF ¹ IEEE-07-145-5003 B THRU G 3.OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FRON 30 Is 3. EQUIPNENT OPERABILITY TINE DATA SHEET: DAYS TESTED VALUE TO 100 DAYS PLUS -s e I FILE N0.33-2-C8 MARGIN BY ANRLYSIS. s DOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: I 4 ~ SWEC CRLCULATION NO ~ 12177-EQS-02ele 4.TERMINAL HE4D GASKET NUST BE REPLACED eACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT s Is WITH A NEW GASKET WHENEVER HEAD COVER IS RENOVED. IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN QUALIFICATION. s 5.FACTORY CERTIFICATION TESTING OF RTD'Sl I NAINT/SURVE ILL HAS DENONSTRATED ACCURACY OF (+/-1.0 Fs THE QUALIFICATION TYPE TESTING HAS I
REFERENCE:
2 <NOTE 4) SHOWN AN ACCURACY OF ~/-1 ' F~ A REVIEW OF THE SETPOINT CALCULATIONS s eQUALIFIED LIFE HAS SHOWN THAT +/-1 ~ 2F IS AN (YERRS>: 40 ACCEPTABLE ACCURACY'
REFERENCE:
2,4 s s s s s s s s ~ s ~
~ ~
s ~
~ ~ ~ ~
NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF ll C041DAY REV 13-Mar-85 ca caa ca ac ca a a a ac aaaaacccaaaacaaacaacccaccccca cc ac a a a caaacaaaaaa ccc a
~ ~ ~
s ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ~
~ ~ ~
s DOCUMENT REFERENCE c aa cccacac a c'aaa ss PARAMETER s SPECIFIED s QUALIFIED QUAL l MARGIN REMARKS lEQUIP NO.: 2CMSATE56A
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
s
~ ~
VALUE VALUE acaaaaaa l
~
SPECIFIED ca aaaaa 'ac l QUALIFIED a -a- s METHOD DEMO s ca aaaca laacaaa sscaaaaaaa acaaca s ~ SPEC NO.: C041D 1 OP. TIME: e NA >100 DAYS AN+DATA s YES NOTE sSYSTEM: CONTAINMENT s lTEMP (F): l s s s s s s s s NOTE 1 MONITORING SYSTEM s s s NORMAL l 104/85 s 150 2,4 TEST-SIM I NA I NOTE 2 s s ABNORMALs 190 TEST-SIM I NA s l TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) s ACCIDENT l 175 I 400 2 TEST-SIM I YES s s RESISTANCE TEMPERATURE lPRESS(PSIG) l s s s s s s s I NOTE 1 DETECTOR (RTD) l NORMAL s -0.25"WG s ATMOS TEST-SIM l NA s s s ABNORMALl -0.25"WG l ATMOS TEST-SIM NA lMANUFACTURER: PYCO s s ACCIDENT I 2 8
~ 63 TEST-SIM I YES s lRH (/): l s s
s s s I NOTE 1 IMODEL NO.: 122-4030-04-2.7- 82.3l I NORMAL 50 s 100 2 TEST-SIM s NA s s
~
s s ABNORMALI 50 100 2 TEST-SIM s NA s lSAFETY FUNCTION: l ACCIDENT l 100 STEAM TEST-SIM I NA s s NA s RADIATION: s s s s NOTE 1 NORM GAMMAs 6. 1E6 l 1 l NA s s ACC GAMMA s 5. 4E7 s 2. 2E8 1 TEST-SIM YES s OP. CODE: B s NORM BETA s NA 1 ss NA s l ACC BETA l 1. 3E7 s 1 s YES NEUTRON NA 1 l NA lSPRAY s NA YES NA 2 TEST-SIM s NA (ACCURACY lSUBMERGENCEl NA l NA NA NA NA NA SPEC: +/-1 ~ 2F NOTE 5 aaa caaaa aa caacaaaaaaaaaccaaacaacacaccaaaccaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aa'a caccac cac DEMO: +/-1 ~ 2F s ABNORMAL s s lZONE NO.: SC196116 s ~ SUBMERGENCE: DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1.FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, l ISPRAY: 1. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. s s I CRITERIA'QEDC-1 s REV 1 v MAY 2e 1984 ~ 2 TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS sEQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. ISUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY s SDDF ll IEEE-07-145-5003 B THRU G 3.OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FROM 30 s s s 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TIME DATA SHEET: DAYS TESTED VALUE TO 100 DAYS PLUS s s F ILE -NO. 33-2-CB MARGIN BY ANALYSIS. s DOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY 4. SWEC CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-029 4.TERMINAL HEAD GASKET MUST BE REPLACED l IACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588, CAT I s s s WITH A NEW GASKET WHENEVER HEAD COVER l s s s IS REMOVED, IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN s s QUALIFICATION. s s 5.FACTORY CERTIFICATION TESTING OF RTD'Sl s s HAS DEMONSTRATED ACCURACY OF (+/-1.0 Fl s MAINT/SURVEILL s s s THE QUALIFICATION TYPE TESTING HAS
REFERENCE:
2 (NOTE '4) s s SHOWN AN ACCURACY OF +/-1 ' F~ s s A REVIEW OF THE SETPOINT CALCULATIONS l QUALIFIED LIFE s s s HAS SHOWN THAT +/-1.2F IS AN (YEARS): 40 s s s ACCEPTABLE ACCURACY. I
REFERENCE:
2 ' s s s ~
~ ~ ~ s s s s ~ ~ s ~ s s ~
NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF ¹ C041DAZ REV rara --= ca aaaa aa --- 13-Mar-85 a c aacc a ccac a a a aa aaac--ar- a aaa aaaaraaccac a aaacaaacccccaaac ccccacccc I
~ ~ ~ ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ~
I
~ ~
DOCUMENT REFERENCE aaccaaaaccaa -- ~ ai I ai PARAMETER I SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED I a s QUAL ~ M4RGIN I REMARKS VALUE I VALUE I SPECIFIED a QUALIFIED ~ METHOD I DEMO s IEQUIP NO.: ISPEC NO.: i'SYSTEM: 2CMS+TE5bB C041D CONTAINMENT MONITORING SYSTEM s I
~
IITEMP (F) OP. TIME: NORMAL ac I I s DDDDDDD NA 104/85 cc I s I I cc aa aa
>100 DAYS 150 I
s I 3 1
~
I I s 2 2,4 ac ~ s I a a D I Daaaaa AN+DATA I YES I TEST-SIM I iNA NA I I
-I I
ac NOTE NOTE NOTE 3 1 2 I ss ABNORMALI 92 I 190 I 1 ~ 2,4 TEST-SIM s I TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) I I ACCIDENT I 175 I 400 1 2 I TEST-SIM s YES s
- ~ ~
I RESISTANCE TEMPERATURE 'PRESS(PSIG) s
' I I NOTE 1 DETECTOR (RTD) ss NORMAL I -0.25"NG I ATMOS s 1 I TEST-SIM I NA s ~ 4BNORMAL ~ Oa 25" NG s ATMOS s 1 TEST-SIM I NA I IMANUFACTURER: PYCO ls ACCIDENTs 2.8 I b3 I 1 2 s I
TEST-SIM I I~ YES I I I I ~ I I I
~
I NOTE 1 IMODEL NO.: 122-4030-04-2.7-82.3 as NORMAL I 50 ~ 100 I 1 s TEST-S IM I NA a I I ss ABNORMALs 50 I 100 I 1 I 2 I TEST-SI M I NA I ISAFETY FUNCTION: sl ACCIDENTI 100 I STEAM s 1 I 2 I TEST-S I M s NA
'RADIATION I NOTE 1 s N4 I s NORM GAMM4 I b. 1Eb I I 1 I I NA I II ACC GAMMA I 5.4E7 I 2.2E8 I 1 I 2 TEST SI M s YES IOP. CODE: B I'ORM BETA s NA I 1 I NA I I
I II ACC BETA s 1.3E7 s a 1 I a YES I I I sl NEUTRON s NA I 1 s NA s I IsiSPRAY I NA ia YES I NA s 2 I TEST-S IM I NA I IACCURACY IISUBMERGENCEI NR I NA s NA a NA I NA I NA I SPEC: +/-1.2F NOTE 5 ~ I acaaa casa a c Dcc c D c D iac a crace c acaa a a DEMO: +/-1. 2F I I
~ I I ~ I s ZONE NO.: SC19bl lb aSUBMERGENCE: s DOCUMENT REFERENCE NOTES: 1 ~ FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONSa I ISPRAY: ~ I 1 ~ EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED.
I CRITERIA s EQEDC-1 a REV I t MAY 2 a 1984 ~ 2.NORMAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN 4S sEQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO s I 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT a MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. ISUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY SDDF ¹ IEEE-07-145-5003 8 THRU G 3.OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FROM 30 I I 3. EQLIIPMENT OPERABILITY TIME DATA SHEET: DAYS TESTED VRLUE TO 100 DAYS PLUS I FILE N0.33-2-C8 MARGIN BY ANALYSIS. I DOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: II 4 ~ SNEC CALCULATION NO. 4 ~ TERMINRL HEAD GASKET MUST BE REPLACED sACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT II ~ I I WITH A NEW GASKET WHENEVER HERD COVER I I I I I IS REMOVED I IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN I I I
~ ~ QUALIFICATION.
I I 5.FACTORY CERTIFICATION TESTING OF RTD'Sl I I HAS DEMONSTRATED ACCURACY OF <+/-I ~ 0 Fs I MA INT/SURVE ILL THE QUALIFICATION TYPE TESTING HAS I
REFERENCE:
2 (NOTE 4) I I I I SHOWN AN ACCUR4CY OF +/-1 2 F. ~ I I I A REVIEW OF THE SETPOINT CALCULATIONS QUALIFIED LIFE
~ ~
s
~
I I I HAS SHOWN THAT +/-1 ~ 2F IS AN (YEARS)z 40 I ~ I I ACCEPTABLE ACCURACY. I
REFERENCE:
2.4 ~
~
I I I I
~ I I ~
I I
~ ~ ~ I I I
0 l 'I
NINE NILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUNBER 50-410 SYSTEN COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QU4L REF ¹ C041DBA REV 0 13-Nar-85 aaacaaccaalcac aaaaaaaaaa c
~ ~ ~
s ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION s s s s DOCUNENT REFERENCE ~ c a a a a a a c aaaaaaaaaa PARANETER I SPECIFIED s QUALIFIED s QUAL siMARGINI
~ ~
s VRLUE s VALUE I SPECIFIED s QU ALIFIED s NETHOD s DENO I IEQUIP NO.: 2CNS+TE56C i i caa aaaaa i ccaacaccacl ,caccaaacaaa I aaaacaaacca ', caa a a , aaa a a ca,aaaaa ,aaaa aa t SPEC NO.: C041D I I OP. TIME: NA >100 DAYS I 3 2 AN+DATA YES NOTE 3 sSYSTEN: CONTAINNENT I TENP
~ (F) s s s I ----- I s - - -I - I NOTE 1 NONITORING SYSTEN sl NORNAL I 104/85 s 150 I 1 t 2,4 TEST-SIN I NA I NOTE 2 s
sl ABNORNALI 92 s 190 t 1 I 2,4 I TEST-SIN I NA I I TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) I I ACCIDENT I 175 400 I 1 2 TEST-SIN I YES RESISTANCE TENPERATURE I IPRESS(PSIG) I - - - s I ---- I --- s I s I NOTE 1 DETECTOR (RTD) ss NORNRL I -0.25"WG s RTNOS I 1 I 2 I TEST-SIN s NA s sl ABNORMAL) -0.25"WG I ATMOS s 1 I 2 I TEST-SIN I NA INANUFACTURER: PYCO s s ACCIDENTs 2~8 s 63 s 1 s s 2 s TEST-SIM I YES I s I s RH ('/): ~ s ~ s s NOTE 1 INODEL NO.: 122-4030-04-2.7-82.3 sl NORNAL s 50 s 100 s 1 2 s TEST-SIN s N4 I t ABNORMALI 50 I 100 I 1 s 2 s TEST-SIN t NA s sSAFETY FUNCTION: I I RCCI DENT I 100 s STE4N s 1 I 2 ~ TEST-SIN s NA s I NA 'RADIATION ~ s
~
s s NOTE 1 s I s NORM GANNAI 6. 1E6 s 1 s s NA I I s RCC GANNA I 5.4E7 s 2.2E8 1 ~ TEST-SIN I YES sOP. CODEt B ts NORN BETA ii NA 1 s s NA I II ACC BETA I 1.3E7 s 1 s s YES I II NEUTRON s NA 1 s I NA I lsSPRAY I NA s YES NA I s TEST-SIN s NA s sACCURACY SPEC: +/-1.2F NOTE 5 ssSUBMERGENCEii I,l,caaacaaaacacaaaac NA acaa caac s NA s NA ccaaaaaaaaaaaaaacaaaaa s I NA I NA s DENO: +/-1.2F ~
~
s s s ~ ~ s s s I ZONE NO.: SC196116 ~ s
~ ~
siSUBMERGENCE: Il DOCUNENT REFERENCE NOTES! 1.FOR CONPLETE ENVIRONNENTAL CONDITIONS, e ISPRAY: s s 1 ~ EQUIPNENT QUALIFICRTION ENVIRONNENTAL DESIG N SEE THE DOCUNENT CRITERIA, EQEDC-1, REV 1, NAY 2, 1984 ~ REFERENCED'.NORMAL I I I TENPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS IEQUIPNENT NOT SUBJECT TO I I 2. VENDOR ENVIRONNENT4L QUALIFICATION REPORT, NAX DESIGN/AVERAGE ISUBNERGENCE OR SPRAY sl SDDF ¹ IEEE-07-145-S003 B THRU G 3.OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FRON 30 s I 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TINE DATA SHEET: DAYS TESTED VALUE TO 100 DAYS PLUS s s I FILE N0.33-2-C8 NARGIN BY ANALYSIS. IDOCUNENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: I I 4. SWEC CRLCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-029 4 ~ TERNINAL HEAD G4SKET NUST BE REPLACED sACCEPTABLE TO NUREG OS88,CAT I s s s s WITH A NEW GASKET WHENEVER HEAD COVER s s
~
s IS RENOVED, IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN s ~
~
s
~ QUALIFICATION.
s s
~ ~
s 5 ~ FACTORY CERTIFICATION TESTING OF RTD'Sl s i s HAS DENONSTRRTED ACCUR4CY OF (+/-I ~ 0 Fl MAINT/SURVEILL s s t s
~
s s THE QUALIFICATION TYPE TESTING HAS
REFERENCE:
2 (NOTE 4) i
~ ~ ~ SHOWN AN ACCURACY OF +/-1 ~ 2 F.
s
~ ~
s s A REVIEW OF THE SETPOINT C4LCULATIONS I QUALIFIED LIFE ~
~ ~ ~ HAS SHOWN THAT +/-1.2F IS AN (YEARS): 40 ~
s
~
s ACCEPTABLE ACCURACY. I
REFERENCE:
2,4 ~ s
~ ~ ~
s
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s ~ ~ ~ s ~ ~
I NINE MIL OINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF aaaaa ¹ C041DBB aaaaaaaaaaa REV 0 acaaaa aaa a a a a aaa aaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa a- aaaaaraaa 13-Mar-85 aaa aaa ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION s s EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION s
~ ~
s s s s s
~ ~ s I DOCUMENT REFERENCE I I l'aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa a a I I PARAMETER s SPECIFIED ~ QUALIFIED s QUAL I MARGIN I REMRRKS s
VALUE I VALUE I SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED I METHOD I DEMO s sEQUIP NO.: 2CMS+TE56D ~ ~ aaaaa s a aasaaa iaaraaaaaaaasaaaa a aaalaaaaaaaaaaal,aaaaaalaaaaaaaa ISPEC NO.: C041D s sOP. TIMEz i NA )100 DAYS 3 AN+DATA YES NOTE 3 ISYSTEM: CONTAINMENT s'TEMP (F)
~ s s
I s I ii - I I NOTE 1 MONITORING SYSTEM NORMAL ii 104/85 s 150 1 I 2,4 I TEST-SIM I NA s NOTE 2 ls ABNORMALI 92 s 190 s 1 s 2s4 I TEST SIM s NA s TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) ACCIDENTI 175 400 TEST-SIM i1 s I 2 YES RESISTANCE TEMPERATURE I IPRESS(PSIG) s
- I ~
s 1 I s s I
~
s I
~
i
~
s NOTE 1 DETECTOR (RTD) ls NORMAL I -0.25"WG s ATMOS 1 I 2 I TEST-SIM NR iNA s s s II ABNORMALs -0.25"WG ~ ATMOS s I 2 I TEST-SIM s s sMANUFACTURER: PYCO Is ACCIDENTs 2.8 s 63 s 1 I 2 s TEST-SIM I YES IIRH (%): ~ s NOTE 1 i50 s s ~ s s IMODEL NO.: 122-4030-04-2.7-82.3 ss NORMAL s 50 I 100 1 2 s TEST-8 I M s NA s sil ABNORMALs I 100 s 1 I 2 i TEST-SIM s NA sSAFETY FUNCTION: sl ACCIDENTs 100 s STEAM I 1 2 i TEST-SIM I NA s I NA I s R4DIATION: s
. s s s i NOTE 1 I s s NORM GAMMAs 6. 1Eb s 1 s NA 2 'E8 e s ls ACC GAMMA 's 5.4E7 s 1 2 I TEST-SIM I YES I IOP. CODE: B ss NORM BETA s NA I 1 s s NA s I ACC BETA s 1.3E7 s s 1 s YES I ls NEUTRON NA s IACCURACY IsSPRAY SUBMERGENCE I
i NA NA iYES s l NA i 1 NA s 2 i TEST-SIM s NA NA I
~ s I I I NA NA NA NA SPEC: +/-1. 2F NOTE 5 s s ~ ~ a aaaaa s
a a aa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaa e aa a DEMO: +/-1. 2F ~
~
s s s s s II s ii IZONE NO.: SC196116 s
~
s
~ s ISUBMERGENCE: DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1. FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, I sSPRAY: I s 1. EQUIPMENT QUALIFIC4TION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. I s CRITERIA, EQEDC-1, REV 1, M4Y 2 1984. 2.NORMAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN 4S IEQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO I s 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. ISUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY ls SDDF ¹ IEEE-07-145-5003 B THRU G 3.OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FROM 30 s I I 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TIME DATA SHEET: DAYS TESTED VALUE TO 100 DAYS PLUS I FILE NO.33-2-C8 M4RGIN BY ANALYSIS~ I DOCUMENTATION 4CCEPTABILITY: sl 4. SWEC CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS- 029 4.TERMINAL HEAD GASKET MUST BE REPLACED sRCCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT I s s
~ ~
WITH A NEW GASKET WHENEVER HEAD COVER s ~
~
s
~
s IS REMOVED, IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN s i QUALIFICATION. s s ~ s ~ 5.FRCTORY CERTIFICATION TESTING OF RTD Sl H4S DEMONSTRATED ACCUR4CY OF (+/-1.0 Fl s ~ ~ s s I MA INT/SURVE ILL ~ s s
~
THE QUALIFICATION TYPE TESTING HAS
REFERENCE:
2 (NOTE 4> SHOWN AN ACCURRCY OF +/-1 '
~ s i ~ ~
s
~
F.
~ s A REVIEW OF THE SETPOINT CALCULATIONS IQUALIFIED LIFE s s
is HAS SHOWN THAT +/-1.2F IS AN s (YEARS>: 40 s
~ ~ ~
ACCEPT4BLE ACCURACY. I
REFERENCE:
2.4 s
~ ~
s s ~ s ~ i
~ ~ ~ ~ s ~ s II
NINE NILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUNBER 50-410 SYSTEN COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF ¹ C041DBC 13-Nar-85 REV aa rar a aaaacaa aac a
= ==-- aaacaaaaaaaaacrcaacaa caacracraaacarraararaaaa, ENVIRONMENTRL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION s EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION I sracraaaaaraarcarraaaraa a s I PARAMETER s
I SPECIFIED s I QUALIFIED I I DOCUNENT REFERENCE ~ I QU4L I I MARGIN s I REMARKS SPECIFIED QUALIFIED
-----,====--
VALUE VALUE METHOD DENO sEQUIP NO.: 2CNSWTE574 s
,ac ~ s ~
aaasaaacararrrcsraraaaaaaaas I a -- crs s aa r s aac,a aca,
~ === aaraac ISPEC NO.: C041D sOP. TINE: I NA I )100 DAYS I 3 I AN+DATA I YES I NOTE 3 ISYSTEN: CONTA INNENT 'ENP (F) -I NOTE 1 NONITORING SYSTEN s NORMAL I 104/85 I 150 I 1 I 2,4 I TEST-SIN I NA I NOTE 2 e
ABNORNALI 92 I 190 I 1 s 2,4 I TEST-SIN I NR I I TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) s s ACCIDENTs 175 I 400 I 1 I 2 I TEST-SIN I YES RESISTANCE TEMPERATURE I 'PRESS(PSIG)' ' ~ s I -I NOTE 1 DETECTOR (RTD) I NORMAL I -0.25"WG s ATNOS I 1 I 2 s'EST-SIN I NA I ABNORMALI -0.25"WG I ATMOS 1 I 2 I TEST-SIM I NA I INANUFACTURER: PYCO ACCIDENTI 28 ~ 63 I 1 s 2 s TEST-SIM I YES s s s RH (/)! s s ~ ~ s s NOTE 1 INODEL NOe 122 )030 04 2e 7 82 3~ s I NORNAL s SO s 100 I 1 s 2 s TEST-SIN I NA s I ABNORNALs SO I 100 s 1 ~ 2 I TEST-S IN I NA ISAFETY FUNCTION: s ACCIDENT s 100 I STEAN s 1 I 2 TEST-SIN I NA I s NA 'R4DIATION s I I NOTE 1 s s NORM GANNA I 6. 1E6 s I 1 I NA .s s s RCC GAMNA s S. 4E7 I 2. 2E8 s 1 ~ TEST S IN I YES I IOP. CODE: B NORN BETA s = NA I s NA s IACCURACY I ACC BETA NEUTRON
!SPRAY ISUBNERGENCEs s ~
s 1.3E7 NA NA NA I s I s YES NA I ss s 1 1 NA NA s2 s s NA TEST-S IN NA
=-- aacarraa aar r ra s
I I I YES N4 NA NA s I I s SPEC: +/-1. 2F NOTE 5 ,aaraaaacaaara aaaaaraaaaaa aaracaaaraaaacr aaaa a aaaaaarrraaaaaaaas DENO: +/-1 2F
~
s s s IZONE NO.: SC196116 ~ SUBMERGENCE: DOCUNENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1 ~ FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONNENTAL CONDITIONS, I sSPRAY: s 1 ~ EQUIPNENT QURLIFICATION ENVIRONNENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. s s CRITERIA, EQEDC-1, REV 1, MAY 2, 1984 ~ 2.NORMAL TENPERATURES RRE SHOWN AS s EQUIPNENT NOT SUBJECT TO I 2 ~ VENDOR ENVIRONNENTAL QURLIFICATION REPORT, NAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. ISUBNERGENCE OR SPRRY SDDF ¹ IEEE-07-145-5003 B THRU G 3.OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FRON 30 I 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TINE DATA SHEET: DAYS TESTED VALUE TO 100 DAYS PLUS s FILE N0.33-2-C8 MARGIN BY AN4LYSIS. s DOCUNENTRT ION ACCEPTABILITY: 4. SWEC CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-029 4.TERMINAL HEAD GASKET MUST BE REPLACED sACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT Il WITH A NEW GASKET WHENEVER HEAD COVER ~ IS REMOVED, IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN s s QUALIFICATION. s 5.FACTORY CERTIFICATION TESTING OF RTD'St s s I HAS DENONSTRATED ACCURACY OF (~/-1.0 Fl I NAINT/SURVEILL s s THE QUALIFICATION TYPE TESTING HAS s s
REFERENCE:
2 (NOTE 4) SHOWN AN ACCURACY OF +/-1.2 F. A REVIEW OF THE SETPOINT CALCULATIONS IQUALIFIED LIFE HAS SHOWN THAT +/-1. 2F IS 4N s (YERRS): 40 ACCEPTABLE ACCURACY. I
REFERENCE:
2,4 s s s s s s s
NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF ¹ C041DBD REV aaaa a aa aaaaaaa- aaaaaaaa aaaaaaa aaaaaa 13-Mar-85 ~ aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaa aaa- a aaaaaaa a aa a aaa ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION s DOCUMENT REFERENCE i aaaaaaaaa aa aaaaaaaaaaaaaa l l PARAMETER s SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED si QUAL IMARGIN REMARKS s s s s VALUE s VALUE l SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED METHOD s DEMO IEQUIP NO.: 2CMS+TE57B ai ssaaaaaaaaaaass aa = a- , aaaaaaaaaa s s s s lSPEC NO.: C041D I OP. TIME: )100 DAYS s s s AN+DATA YES NOTE 3 lSYSTEM: CONTAINMENT I TEMP (F): ~ s s s s s l NOTE 1 s MONITORING SYSTEM s NORMAL s 104/85 s 150 s 2 4 s TEST-SI M l NA NOTE 2 il ABNORMALsi 190 l TEST-S IM s NA iACCIDENT s ~ s s TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) i s 175 400 s TEST-S I M s YES RESISTANCE TEMPERATURE s PRESS (PS I 6) ~ s ~ s s s NOTE 1 DETECTOR (RTD) s NORMAL ~ -0.25"WG l ATMOS I TEST-SIM I NA s ABNORMALl -0.25"WG l ATMOS s 2 I TEST-SIM s NA lMANUFACTURER: PYCO ACCIDENT l 2.8 s 63 s 2 l TEST-SIM s YES sRH (/): I s
~
s
~
s s s s NOTE 1 IMODEL NO.: 122-4030-04-2.7-82.3 ~ NORMAL 50 100 l TEST-SIM l NA s s ABNORMAL'CCIDENT>> 50 l 100 s s TEST-S IM ~ NA (SAFETY FUNCTION: 100 l STEAM l ii TEST-S IM l NA s NA s RAD I AT ION: s s s s s s NOTE 1 NORM GAMMAl 6. 1E6 NA l s ACC GAMMA s 5.4E7 2. 2E8 1 s TEST-S I M l YES 10P. CODE: B I NORM BETA I NA 1 s s NA s s l ACC BETA I 1. 3E7 1 l YES I I NEUTRON s NA 1 s i s NA s s sSPRAY s NA YES NA 2 l TEST-S I M s NA IACCURACY ISUBMERGENCEI NA NA NA NA l NA s NA SPEC: '+/-1 2F
~ NOTE 5 ~ a aaaa ii DEMO: ~/-I ~ 2F s s
s s ZONE NO.: SC196116 is
~ SUBMERGENCE DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1. FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, l iiSPRAY: s 1. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. l CRITERIA, EQEDC-1, REV 1, MAY 2, 1984. 2.NORMAL TEMPERATURES ARE. SHOWN AS sEQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO l 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. iiSUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY SDDF ¹ IEEE-07-145-5003 B THRU G 3.OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FROM 30 s 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TIME DATA SHEET: DAYS TESTED VALUE TO 100 DAYS PLUS FILE NO. 33-2-C8 MARGIN BY ANALYSIS. l DOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: 4. SWEC CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-029 4.TERMINAL HEAD GASKET MUST BE REPLACED IACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT Il s s WITH A NEW GASKET WHENEVER HEAD COVER s s IS REMOVED, IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN s s QUALIFICATION. s s 5.FACTORY CERTIFICATION TESTING OF RTD'Sl s s s s HAS DEMONSTRATED ACCURACY OF (+/-1.0 Fs l MAINT/SURVE ILQ- s THE QUALIFICATION TYPE TESTING HAS
REFERENCE:
2 (NOTE 4) SHOWN AN ACCURACY OF +/-1.2 F. A REVIEW OF THE SETPOINT CALCULATIONS s QUALIFIED LIFE HAS SHOWN THAT +/-1. 2F IS AN (YEARS):, "40 ACCEPTABLE ACCURACY. s REFERENCE 2,4
~ ~ ~ s ~ s ~ s ~ s ~ s
NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVRLUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF II C041DBE REV 13-Mar-85 ~ aaaaziaaa aaraaaa ar --- ~ I r a aa a r --- r aa arrar aa aa aaaaaaaaaaaaaziaaaaaaaazsaaaaaaaaazsaaa aaaaa r a
~ ~ ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QURLIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ I DOCUMENT REFERENCE ~ aaaaalzziaazeaaazs aaa I I PARAMETER I SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED s s QUAL I MARGIN s REMARKS >>EQUIP NO.: 2CMS+TE57C ' ' s - --'rzlaaaraaaaiz VALUE I VALUE ~
s SPECIFIED I
-aaraaaaaazs'aa QU ALIFIED I METHOD aaaaaaaaa,aziriza aazi I
DEMO I aaaaa,aaazsra aaaa
>>SPEC NO.: C041D ~ ~ OP TIME I NA ~ >100 DAYS I 3 I 2 I AN+DATA ~ YES s NOTE 3 ISYSTEM: CONTAINMENT TEMP (F) ~
NOTE 1 I MONITORING SYSTEM ssi NORMAL s 104/85 s 150 I 1 2,4 I TEST-SIM I NA I NOTE 2 I I ABNORMALt 92 I 190 2,4 TEST-SIM NA
----- i---I -NOTE ~ I 1 I I I I TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) I s ACCIDENT I 175 I 400 t 1 s 2 I TEST-SIM I YES I RESISTANCE TEMPERATURE 'PRESS(PSIG) ~ ' I s I l 1 DETECTOR (RTD) sl NORMAL I -0.25"WG I ATMOS I 1 2 TEST-S I M s NA I sl RBNORMALI -0.25"WG s ATMOS I 1 s 2 I TEST-S I M I NA i>>MANUFACTURERS PYCO I I ACCIDENT I 2. 8 I 63 ~ 1 I 2 I TEST-S I M s YES I I sRH (%): ~ I I I I ~ ~ NOTE 1 IMODEL NO.: 122-4030-04-2.7-82.3 I I NORMAL I 50 s 100 s 1 2 TEST-S I M s NA I I ssiABNORMALI 50 I 100 t 1 I 2 I TEST-S IM I NA I I SAFETY FUNCTION: I I ACCIDENT>> 100 I STERN I 1 I 2 I TEST-S I M t NA I I NA RADIATION I s I NOTE 1 I
I t NORM GAMMAI 6 ~ 1E6 I 1 I I NA I
~ I ACC GAMMA s 5 4E7 I 2 2E8 s 1 2 I TEST-S I M I YES I IOP. CODE: B II NORM BETA I . NA I 1 s NA si ss ACC BETA I 1.3E7 s 1 I I YES ss NEUTRON s NR 1 I
I NA s s ~ SPRAY I NA I YES I NA I TEST-S I M NA I'aaaa t s IACCURACY
-=-=--
s>>SUBMERGENCEI NA I NA s NA I NA I NA I NA I SPEC: +/-1 2F
~ NOTE 5 aaa aaaaa aararraaaarziaa zl aa a a a aaaaaarsza a I DEMO: +/-1.2F ~
I I
~
I ~ I ~ I ZONE NO.: SC196116 ~ I
~ ~
ISUBMERGENCE: DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1.FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, I sSPRAY: s s 1 ~ EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIG N SEE THE DOCUMENT I I I CRITERIA, EQEDC-1, REV 1, MAY 2, 1984. REFERENCED'.NORMAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS IEQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO I I 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. >>SUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY Is SDDF II IEEE-07-145-5003 B THRU G 3.OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FROM 30 I I 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TIME DATA SHEET: DAYS TESTED VALUE TO 100 DAYS PLUS I I s FlLE N0.33-2-C8 MARGIN BY ANRLYSIS. 's DOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: ~ I 4. SWEC CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-029 4.TERMINAL HEAD GASKET MUST BE REPLACED IRCCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT ~
~
I I WITH A NEW GRSKET WHENEVER HEAD COVER I I ~ ~ IS REMOVED, IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN I I
~ ~ ~
I QUALIFICATION. I
~ I I
5.FACTORY CERTIFICATION TESTING OF RTD'Sl HAS DEMONSTRATED ACCURACY OF <+/-1.0 Fs
~ ~ ~
I MAINT/SURVE ILL I I I ~ THE QUALIFICATION TYPE TESTING HAS
REFERENCE:
2 (NOTE 4) ~ I
~ I SHOWN AN ACCURACY OF +/-1.2 F.
I ~ ~
~ I A REVIEW OF THE SETPOINT CRLCULATIONS s QUALIFIED LIFE HAS SHOWN THAT +/-1.2F IS AN (YEARS): 40 I ~ ~ ~
ACCEPTABLE ACCURACY.
REFERENCE:
2,4 I I
~ I I I ~ ~ ~ I I ~
I ~ I ~
NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF ¹ C041DBF REV 13-Mar-85 Rccccccacccccac c c a Dc c a Dc ccacaaaccaccccccacca ca cacccccc R D Cc DSS DR ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION I I I DOCUMENT REFERENCE I I Dcc ccrc Ccrc Dccaccacccccccc I PRRAMETER I SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED I QUAL IMARGINI REMARKS SPECIFIED QUALIFIED I VALUE I VALUE I caccccI'cccccccacc I METHOD DEMO I
--- '---- ----- ---I -
s s IEQUIP NO.: 2CMS+TES7D I,accaccacaaclccaaaaa aaceaccaaccaaaceeacc 'aaaa acrcaaI'aaacacl,aacaacaaaaaaccccl, ISPEC NO.: ISYSTEM: I C041D CONTAINMENT MONITORING SYSTEM
~ OP TIME 'TEMP (F)
NORMAL I
~
I ----- ----- NA 104/85 I >100 DAYS I I I 150 s 3 1 I I 2 2e4 I I i AN+DATA TEST SIM I I I YES NA I
~
NOTE 3 NOTE 1 NOTE 2 ABNORMAL s 92 I 190 I 1 I 2s 4 i TEST SIM I NA I I TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) I ACCIDENT 175 I 400 I 1 I 2 I TEST-SI M I YES I
-- - - -I s
RESISTANCE TEMPERATURE IPRESS(PSIG) ' I I I I I NOTE 1 I DETECTOR (RTD) I - NORMAL s -0.25"WG I ATMOS I 1 I 2 I TEST-SIM I NA I I ABNORMAL'0.25"WG I ATMOS I 1 I' I TEST-SIM I NA I IMANUFACTURER: PYCO ACCIDENTI 2 8 ~ 63 I 1 ~ 2 I TEST SIM I YES I I
~
I~
~
I
~
I
~
I NOTE 1 IMODEL NO.: 122-4030-04-2.7-82 3 I I
~ NORMAL I SO I 100 I 1 I 2 I TEST-SIM ie NA I I I ABNORM4L s 50 I 100 I 1 I 2 I TEST-SIM I NA ISAFETY FUNCTION: s ACCIDENT ~ 100 I STEAM ~ 1 I 2 I TEST SIM ~ NA NA I RADIATION s I I I I ~ I NOTE 1 I s NORM GAMMAI 6 lE6 I I 1 I I NA I I ACC GRMMA I S. 4E7 I 2. 2E8 I 1 I 2 I TEST-S IM I YES I IOP. CODE: B NORM BETA I ~
NA ~ 1 I I I NA I I I ACC BETA I 1.3E7 I I 1 I liYES le I NEUTRON I NA 1 I I NA I ISPRAY I NA I YES I NA I 2 I TEST-SIM I NA I IACCURACY ISUBMERGENCEI NA I NA NA I NA I NA I NA arrr s I SPEC: +/-1 ~ 2F NOTE 5 eaa Racr aaarrrraaaacrraa aaaaaaaa a D Daa CCDCDDCCCCD Rccaa aaa C Ca Daaaaraa I DEMO: +/-1. 2F I I I I I I I ZONE NO.: SC196116 I ~" ISUBMERGENCE: DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1 ~ FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, I sSPRAY: I 1 ~ EQUIPMENT QUALIFIC4TION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED' I CRITERIAs EQEDC-1, REV 1, MAY 2, 1984 ~ 2.NORMAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS I IEQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO i2. l VENDOR ENVIRONMENT4L QUALIFICATION REPORT,
¹ IEEE-07-14S-5003 B THRU G MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE.
eiSUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY SDDF 3.OPER4BILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FROM 30 I 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TIME DATA SHEET: DAYS TESTED VALUE TO 100 DAYS PLUS FILE NO ~ 33-2-CB MARGIN BY ANALYSIS. I DOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: I 4~ SWEC CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-029 4 ~ TERMINAL HEAD GASKET MUST BE REPLACED I IACCEPTRBLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT WITH A NEW GASKET WHENEVER HEAD COVER I I IS REMOVED, IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN I I QUALIFICATION. I I I 5.FACTORY CERTIFICATION TESTING OF RTD'Sl I I HAS DEMONSTRATED ACCURACY OF (+/-1 ~ 0 Fl I MA INT/SURVE ILL THE QUALIFICATION TYPE TESTING H4S I
REFERENCE:
2 (NOTE 4) SHOWN AN ACCURACY OF +/-1.2 F. A REVIEW OF THE SETPOINT CALCULATIONS I IQUALIFIED LIFE HAS SHOWN THAT +/-1 ~ 2F IS AN (YEARS): 40 I ACCEPTABLE RCCURACY. I I
REFERENCE:
2e4 I I I I
NINE NILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUNBER 50-410 SYSTEN COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF ¹ C041DBG REV aa alla aa11'a a a aaaaaaa 13-Nar-85 11 a a a a11aa aaas1a 1aaas111al aaa 'a
~ ~ ~
I ENVIRONNENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION I EGUIPNENT DESCRIPTION I
~ ~
I DOCUNENT REFERENCE I I >> PARANETER s SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED ~ si QUAL I MARGIN I REMARKS SPECIFIED QUALIFIED I IEQUIP NO.: 2CNS+TE584 aa'aaa VALUE I aa--a a'aaaaaaaa'a VALUE s aaaaaaaai I
~ NETHOD aaaaaaa I
I DEMO I
, --- a ISPEC NO.: C041D I I OP. TIME: I NA I >100 DAYS 3 2 I AN+DATA is YES I NOTE 3 ISYSTEN: CONTAINNENT IITENP (F)-
s s
-I NOTE 1 NQNITORING SYSTEN NORNAL I 104/85 I 150 I 1 I 2,4 ~ TEST SIN s NA I NOTE 2 I
ABNQRNALI 92 s 190 I 1 I 2~4 I TEST SIN ~ NA I TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) ~ s ACCIDENT s 175 s 400 I 1 I 2 s TEST-SIM a YES I RESISTANCE TENPERATURE 'PRESS(PSIG) ' ' ' I I ~ I I NOTE 1 DETECTOR (RTD) ss NORMAL s -0.25"WG I ATNOS I 1 I 2 I TEST-5IM I NA ss ABNQRNALI -0.25"WG I ATMOS I 1 s 2 I TEST-SIN I NA I sNANUFACTURER: PYCO I I ACCIDENTs 2.8 I 63 s 1 I 2 TEST-SIM I YES (I /5) ~ I I I R I I I
~ ~
I I NOTE 1 IMODEL NO.: 122-4030-04-2.7-82.3 es NQRNAL ~ 50 s 100 I 1 2 s TEST-S I M I NA s It ABNORMAL( 50 s 100 s 1 s 2 TEST-SIN e NA a I SAFETY FUNCTION I I ACCIDENTI 100 I STEAN I 1 I 2 s TEST-SIN I NA I I NA ' RADIATION ' ' ' s
~
I I NOTE 1 I I NORN GANMAI 1. 1E6 I ~ NA ~ I I'CC GAMNA I 2. 6E6 I 2.2EB s 1 ~ I TEST SIN I YES I I OP. I CODE: B tl NQRN BETA I NA I 1 I NA I I I I ACC BETA I 1 ~ 3E7 I I 1 I YES I I NA al NEUTRON s NA ~ 1 I I I ~ I IISPRAY s NA s YES I NA I 2 I TEST-S I M I NA I IACCURACY ~ sSUBNERGENCEs NA e NA I NA ~ NA NA a NA I SPEC! +/-1 ~ 2F NOTE 5 DEMO: +/-1. 2F ~
~
I I
~ ~ ~ ~
I ZONE NO.: SC196113 ~
~
I
~
ISUBMERGENCE:
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1.FQR CONPLFTE ENVIRONMENT4L CONDITIONS,I ISPRAY: s s 1. EQUIPNENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONNENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. I I CRITERIA~ EQEDC-1, REV 1, MAY 2, 1984. 2.NORMAL TENPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS IEGUIPNENT NOT SUBJECT TO 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, I'IAX DESIGN/AVER4GE. ISUBMERGENCE OR SPR4Y SDDF ¹ IEEE-07-145-5003 B THRU G 3.OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FRON 30
- 3. EQUIPNENT OPERABILITY TINE DATA SHEET: D4YS TESTED VALUE TO 100 DAYS PLUS I FILE NO. 33-2-CB NARGIN BY ANALYSIS.
I DOCUNENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: I I 4. SWEC CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-029 4 ~ TERNINAL HEAD GASKET MUST BE REPLACED
!ACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT I ~ ~ ~ ~ WITH A NEW GASKET WHENEVER HEAD COVER I ~ ~
I
~ IS RENOVED, IN ORDER TQ NAINTAIN ~ ~ ~
I QUAL IF ICATION. ACCURACY'OCUMENT 5.FACTORY CERTIFICATION TESTING OF RTD Sl
~ ~
I I HAS DEMONSTRATED ACCURACY OF (+/-1.0 Fl
~ NAINT/SURVEILL I I ~ I THE QUALIFICATION TYPE TESTING HAS
REFERENCE:
2 (NOTE 4) I I I ~ SHOWN AN ACCURACY OF +/-1 ~ 2 F. I ~ I
~ I 4 REVIEW OF THE SETPOINT CALCULATIONS ~ QUALIFIED LIFE ~
I
~ ~ HAS SHOWN THAT +/-1. 2F IS AN (YEARS): 40 ~ ~ ~ ~ ACCEPTABLE I
REFERENCE:
214 ~ I I
~ I I I I I I ~ ~ I ~ I I I ~ I
NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 0 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF ¹ C041DBH REV
=-=--=-- -- aaaaaa 13-Mar-85 aa = a a aa aaaaaaaaaaaaa a a aaaaaee aaa aaaaaaaaaa aaa aaaa ~ ~ ~ ~ ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION s s
s s s s s DOCUMENT REFERENCE s s aa aaaa aaaa PARAMETER SPECIFIED QUALIFIED QUAL sMARGINl REMARKS s s I I s s SPECIFIED QUALIFIED s VALUE VALUE I s s METHOD I DEMO s
~ s s EQUIP NO.: 2CMS+TE58B ~
aaaaaaaaaaasaaa aaaaaas aasaaaa ~ a -a aaaaaaas a a'aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa NO.: >100 DAYS l 3 2 AN+DATA l YES NOTE 3 sSPEC sSYSTEM: C041D CONTAINMENT
~ OP. TIME: 'TEMP (F) s NA l l
I I - - -'I NOTE 1 MONITORING SYSTEM NORMAL ' 104/85 s 150 s 1 l 2,4 I TEST-SIM s NA l NOTE 2 s I ABNORMALl 92 l 190 l 1 2r4 s TEST-S IM s NA TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) I ACCIDENT I 175 400 1 2 TEST-S I M l YES I s RESISTANCE TEMPERATURE lPRESS(PSIG) ' ' s s I s s
-l NOTE 1 s
DETECTOR (RTD) s I NORMAL s 0 25"WG l ATMOS I 1 s I TEST-SIM s NA s s s ABNORMALs -0.25"WG I ATMOS s 1 s 2 ~ TEST-SIM s NA s <<MANUFACTURER: PYCO s I ACCIDENTs 2.8 l 63 l 1 s TEST-SIM l YES s s s s l RH (/): s NOTE 1 I MODEL NO.: 122-4030-04-2. 7- 82. 3 l s NORMAL I 50 s 100 l 1 s 2 TEST-SI M I NA ~ s l I ABNORMALl 50 l 100 s 1 2 s TEST-S IM s NA ISAFETY FUNCTION: I ACCIDENTs 100 s STEAM s 1 s s TEST-S I M s NA s I NA s s lRADIATION s s s s s s s NOTE 1 s s s NORM GAMMAs 1 ~ 1E6 l l 1 s I NA s s s l ACC GAMMA s 2.6E6 s 2.2E8 l 1 2 s TEST-SIM s YES lOP. CODE: B s I NORM BETA s - NA l 1 s NA l s ACC BETA l 1.3E7 I 1 l YES l s s s s NEUTRON ~ NA l l 1 s l NA l s sSPRAY I NA s YES l NA 2 ~ TEST-S IM l NA s sACCURACY ~ SUBMERGENCE'A s NA ~ NA s NA I NA s NA s SPEC: +/-1. 2F NOTE 5 s s aa a a a a a a aaa DEMO: w/-1.2F s s s sZONE NO.: SC196113 s s sSUBMERGENCE: DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1.FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, s lSPRAY: s 1. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. s CRITERIA, EQEDC-1, REV 1, MAY 2, 1984. 2.NORMAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS lEQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO I 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. sSUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY l SDDF ¹ IEEE-07-145-5003 B THRU G 3.OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FROM 30 s I 3 ~ EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TIME DATA SHEET: DAYS TESTED VALUE TO 100 DAYS PLUS s FILE NO.33-2-C8 MARGIN BY ANALYSIS~ l DOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: s 4. SWEC CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-029 4.TERMINAL HEAD GASKET MUST BE REPLACED lACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588, CAT I s WITH A NEW GASKET WHENEVER HEAD COVER s s s s
~
s IS REMOVED, IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN s ~ s s s QUALIFICATION. s 5.FACTORY CERTIFICATION TESTING OF RTD'Sl HAS DEMONSTRATED ACCURACY OF <~/-1.0 Fs
~ MA INT/SURVE ILL ~ ~ ~ ~ THE QUALIFICATION TYPE TESTING HAS
REFERENCE:
2 (NOTE 4) s s s s SHOWN AN ACCURACY OF +/-1.2 F. s
~ ~ ~ ~ A REVIEW OF THE SETPOINT CALCULATIONS I QUALIFIED LIFE ~ ~
s
~ HAS SHOWN THAT +/-1. 2F IS AN (YEARS): 40 s s
s
~ ACCEPTABLE ACCURACY.
REFERENCE:
2.4 s
~ ~
s s s
~ s s ~
s ~ le s ~
~ s
NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUNBER 50-410 SYSTEN COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1
¹ C041DBI REV 16-Nar-85 QUAL REF ~
s
~
s ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ~ s
~
s s ~ t)QCUFIENT R EFERENCE s s PARANETER s SPECIFIED e QUALIFIED s QUAL tsNARGIN s RENARKS s I VALUE t VALUE s SPECIFIED QUALIFIED s METHOD s DENO ~ s
~ ~
sEQUIP NO.: s 2CMS+TE58C ~
~
s s
~ s s TINE: NA )100 DAYS l 3 2 I AN+DATA YES I NOTE 3 aSPEC NO.: C041D s sOP. e e e
NOTE 1 ISYSTEN: CONTAINNENT 'TENP (F) sl NORNAL 104/85 150 2 4 TEST-SIN NA NOTE 2 NONITORING SYSTEM t e e 1 e e ~ s ABNORNALs 92 s 190 s 1 2,4 e TEST-SIN t NA e ~ TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) ACCIDENT s 175 s 400 l 1 2 TEST-SIM I YES I RESISTANCE TENPERATURE 'PRESS(PSIG) ' NOTE 1 DETECTOR (RTD) ~ NORMAL s -0. 25"WG l ATNOS l 1 2 s TEST-SIN s NA s s ss ABNORNAL>> -0.25"WG l ATMOS s 1 2 s TEST-SIM e NA ~ sMANUFACTURER: PYCO ACCIDENT ~ 2 8 ~ 63 s 1 2 s TEST S IN ~ YES ~ I lRH (%) I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s NOTE 1 sMODEL NO.: 122-4030-04-2.7-82.3 ~ s NORNAL s 50 s 100 ~ 1 2 s TESTSIN e NA s se 4BNORNAL ~ 50 s 100 s 1 2 TEST-SIN s NA s lSAFETY FUNCTION: e e ACCIDENT ~ 100 s STEAM s 1 2 s TEST-S IM s NA s
'RADIATION s s NOTE 1 NA s e
il NORM GANNAs 1 1E6 s 2.2E8 s 1 s TEST-SIN e NA YES e s s ss ACC GANNA ~ 2.6E6 e s 1 s ~ s et NORN BETA l NA 1 s s NA I
~ OP. CODE: B s s
I e ACC BETA s 1. 3E7. e s 1 ~ YES s s ee NEUTRON e NA e 1 s NA ~ TEST-S I M s s ssSPRAY ~ NA s YES s NA 2 ~ s NA a eACCURACY ssSUBNERGENCEs N4 s NA s NA N4 e N4 s NA s SPEC: +/-1. 2F NOTE 5 ~ s
~
s DEMO: +/-1. 2F s s
~ ~ ~
s s s ~ s ZONE NO.: SC196113 ~
~ ~
s 1.FOR CONPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, s lSUBNERGENCE: DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: I sSPRAY: e s i. EQUIPMENT QUALIFIC4TION ENVIRONNENTAL DESIG N SEE THE DOCUNENT REFERENCED. 2.NORMAL TEMPERATURES 4RE SHOWN AS s s CRITERIA> EQEDC 1 t REV 1 t MAY 2e 1984 ~ s EQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO t s 2. VENDOR ENVIRONNENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, NAX DESIGN/AVERAGE.
~
sSUBNERGENCE OR SPRAY SDDF ¹ IEEE-07-145-5003 B THRU G 3.OPER4BILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FROM 30 s s ~ 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TIME DATA SHEET: DAYS TESTED VALUE TO 100 DAYS PLUS s s s FILE N0.33-2-C8 MARGIN BY ANALYSIS. s DOCUNENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: 4. SWEC CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-029 4.TERNINAL HEAD GASKET NUST BE REPLACED lACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT I ~ s
~
s WITH A NEW GASKET WHENEVER HEAD COVER
~
s s s IS RENOVED, IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN s ~ QUALIFICATION.
~
s ~ s 5. FACTORY CERTIFICATION TESTING OF RTD'Sl s
~
s s s s s HAS DEMONSTRATED ACCURACY OF (+/-1.0 Fe THE QUALIFICATION TYPE TESTING HAS s NAINT/SURVEILL s s SHOWN AN ACCURACY OF +/-1.2 F.
~
s ~
REFERENCE:
2 (NOTE 4) ~
~
s
~
s s ~ A REVIEW OF THE SETPOINT C4LCULATIONS HAS SHOWN THAT .+/-1.2F IS AN s ~ ~ s QUALIFIED LIFE ~
~ ~ ~
(YEARS): 40 ~ s s s ACCEPTABLE ACCUR4CY.
REFERENCE:
2,4 ~ s s s
~ ~ ~ s s s s s ~ ~
s ~
~ ~ ~ ~
NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF ¹ C041DBJ REV 16-Mar-85 ss s s
~
s ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION s
~
s
~
s s s DOCUMENT REFERENCE ~ W PARAMETER s SPECIFIED t QUALIFIED ~ QUAL I MARGIN s REMARKS SPECIFIED QUALIFIED METHOD DEMO s EQUIP NO.: 2CMSssTE58D a=md s s s VALUE
-m----
s s s VALUE s
~
s s s s
~
s s I
~ ~
s
=
s sSPEC NO.: C041D s OP TIME' NA ~ )100 DAYS s 3 ~ 2 AN+DATA s YES I NOTE sSYSTEM: CONTAINMENT 'TEMP (F) s s s s s NOTE 1 s MONITORING SYSTEM NORMAL s 104/85 s 150 s 1 s 2s4 s TEST-SIM s NA s NOTE s ABNORMALs 92 s 190 s 1 s 2s4 s TEST-S IM s NA e TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) s ACCIDENTs 175 s 400 t 1 s 2 s TEST-S I M ~ YES RESISTANCE TEMPERATURE
~ ~
NOTE 1 sPRESS(PSIG)'ORMAL DETECTOR (RTD) s -0. 25"WG s ATMOS s 1 ~ 2 s TEST-S I M s NA e ABNQRMALs -0.25"WG s ATMOS s 1 I 2 ~ TEST-SIM ~ NA sMANUFACTURER: PYCO 4CCIDENTs 2.8 s 63 t 1 s 2 TEST-SI M l YES s a s s s s NOTE 1 s MODEL NO.: 122-4030-04-2. 7-82 .31 NORMAL s SO ~ 100 s 1 s 2 s TEST-S I M s NA s s s ABNORMALs SO l 100 s 1 I 2 ~ TEST-S I M ~ NA s sSAFETY FUNCTION: ~ ACCIDENT ~ 100 ~ STEAM s 1 ~ 2 s TEST-S IM s NA s ~ NA s RADIATION: s I
~ ~ s s NOTE 1 s
s s NORM GAMMAe 1. 1E6 s s 1 s s NA s s ACC GAMMA s 2.6E6 s 2.2E8 ~ 1 ~ 2 s TEST-8 I M ~ YES I OP. CODE: B NORM BETA s NA .s NA s
~
s ACC BETA s '.3E7 s e 1 s YES s s s s NEUTRON s NA s ~ 1 s NA s s s sSPRAY l N4 l YES s NA ~ 2 ~ TEST-SIM ~ NA ~ sACCURACY sSUBMERGENCEs NA a N4 s NA s NA s NA s NA s SPEC: +/-1. 2F NOTE 5 s DEMO: +/-1. 2F s s s I ZONE NO.: SC 1961 13 s s sSUBMERGENCE: s DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1.FOR CQMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, ~ sSPRAY: s 1. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. s s CRITERIA, EQEDC-1, REV 1, MAY 2, 1984. 2.NORMAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS sEQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. sSUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY s SDDF ¹ IEEE-07-145-5003 B THRU G 3.OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FROM 30 s s 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TIME DATA SHEET: DAYS TESTED VALUE TO 100 DAYS PLUS FILE N0.33-2-C8 MARGIN BY ANALYSIS.
)DOCUMENTATION 4CCEPTABILITY: 4. SWEC CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-029 4.TERMINAL HEAD GASKET MUST BE REPLACED lACCEPTABLE TO NUREG OS88,CAT WITH A NEW GASKET WHENEVER HEAD COVER s
IS REMOVED s IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN QUALIFICATION. 5 FACTORY CERTIFICATION TESTING OF RTD S ~ HAS DEMONSTRATED ACCURACY OF <+/-1.0 Fl MAINT/SURVEILL THE QUALIFICATION TYPE TESTING HAS
~/-1.2 s
REFERENCE:
2 (NOTE 4) SHOWN AN ACCURACY OF F. s A REVIEW OF THE SETPOINT CALCULATIONS s QUALIFIED LIFE HAS SHOWN THAT +/-1. 2F IS AN (YEARS): 40 ACCEPTABLE ACCURACY.
REFERENCE:
2,4 s
~
s s
~
a
~ ~ ~ a a s ~ ~
s s
~ ~
s ~
NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50 410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF ¹ C041DBK REV Ib-Mar-85 I
~ ~
I ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION I EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ~ I ~
~ DOCUMENT R EFERENCE ~ s PARAMETER s SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED I QUAL IMARGINI REMARKS I VALUE s VALUE l SPECIFIED s QUAL IF IE D s METHOD l DEMO I ~ ~ ~
I sEQUIP NQ.: 2CMSssTE594 ~ I I
~
I I ~ I I ~ I SPEC NO.: C041D l IOP. TIME: l NA s >100 DAYS s 3 ~ AN+DATA I YES s NOTE sSYSTEM: CONTAINMENT s I TEMP (F) s ~ NOTE 1 MONITORING SYSTEM NORMAL s 104/85 I 150 I 1 2,4 TEST SIM I NA ~ NOTE 2 ABNORMALI 92 s 190 l 1 4 s TEST-8 I M I NA s l TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) ACCIDENT l 1 75 I 400 I 1 l TEST-S I M s YES RESISTANCE TEMPERATURE s ~ PRESS (PSIG) NOTE 1 DETECTOR (RTD) l I NORMAL l -0. 25" WG I ATMOS I 1 2 I TEST-S I M I NA I I s s ABNORMAL s 0 25 WG l ATMOS l 1 2 s TEST-SIM ~ NA I lMANUFACTURER: PYCO ACCIDENT ~ 2. 8 l 63 I 1 2 TEST-S I M ~ YES I ssRH (%): I ~ ~ NOTE 1 IMODEL NO.: 122-4030-04-2. 7-82.3 as NORMAL s 50 s 100 s 1 2 s TEST-S I M l NA I ABNORM4Ls 50 I 100 I 1 2 s TEST-S I M s NA ~ ISAFETY FUNCTION: sl ACCIDENTI 100 l STEAM l 1 I TEST-S IM I NA I s NA ~ 'ADIATION ~ I I ~ NOTE 1 I I s NORM GAI'1M4s 1. 1Eb I 1 s NA
~ s ACC GAMMA s 2 6Eb l 2 2E8 l 1 I TEST-S I M s YES IOP. CODE: B NORM BETA I NA 1 s NA '.3E7 ~ s ~
I I I ls ACC BETA s ~ 1 YES I ~ ~ NEUTRON s NA s 1 l NA ~ ssSPRAY l NA l YES I NA TEST-S IM ~ NA IACCURACY SUBMERGENCE'A NA ~ NA s NA s NA ~ SPEC: +/-1. 2F NOTE 5 ~
~ ~ ~
DEMO: +/-1. 2F ~
~
I I
~ I ~ I I
oZONE NO.: SC196113 ~ I
~ ~
lSUBMERGENCEt DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES 1 FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, I ISPRAY: I l 1. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DES IGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. CRITERI4 s EQEDC-1 s REV 1 s MAY 2 s 1984 2 NORMAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS IEGUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. ISUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY SDDF ¹ IEEE-07-145-5003 B THRU G 3 ~ OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FROM 30 I I l I 3. EQUIPMENT OPER4BILITY TIME DAT4 SHEET: DAYS TESTED VALUE TO 100 DAYS PLUS I FILE N0.33-2-CG MARGIN BY ANALYSIS-e DOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: 4. SWEC C4LCUL4TION NQ. 12177-EQS-029 4. TERMINAL HEAD GASKET MUST BE REPLACED IACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588sCAT II ~
~
I WITH A NEW GASKET WHENEVER HEAD COVER s I I
~ ~
I IS REMOVED, IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN I I
~ ~
I QUALIFICATION. OF RTD 'S
~
I I
~
- 5. FACTORY CERTIFICATION TESTING s
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ HAS DEMONSTRATED ACCURACY OF (+/-1.0 Fl I MA INT/SURVE ILL- ~ I THE QUALIFICATION TYPE TESTING HAS SHOWN AN ACCURACY OF ~/-1 ' ~ ~
I
REFERENCE:
2 (NOTE 4) ~ I I I F. I I I I I A REVIEW OF THE SETPOINT CALCULATIONS HAS SHOWN THAT ~/-1. 2F IS AN
~ ~
I s QUALIFIED LIFE I I
~ ~
I I I (YEARS): 40 ~
~ ~ ~
ACCEPTABLE ACCUR4CY. I
REFERENCE:
2,4 ~
~ ~
I I
~
I ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
I ~
NINE MILE POINT - UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF ¹ C041DBL REV 16-Mar-85 C
~
I
~ ~ ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION I
EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ~
~ ~
s DOCUMENT REF ERENCE PARAMETER I SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED QUAL ~ MARGIN I REMARKS I VALUE ~ VALUE e SPECIFIED ~ QUALIFIED s METHOD DEMO IEQUIP NO.: 2CMS+TE59B ~ ~ I I CC C ~
~ ~
I sSPEC NO.: C041D I s OP. TIME: s )100 DAYS AN+DATA I YES I NOTE 3 ISYSTEM: CONTAINMENT e I TEMP (F)! ~ ~ NOTE 1 MONITORING SYSTEM se NORMAL 104/85 150 I 1 2>4 TEST-SIM I NA s NOTE 2 es ABNORMAL ~ 9g 190 1 TEST-S IM I NA I I TYPES'DESCRIPTION) II 4CCIDENT e 175 I 400 1 2 TEST-SIM s YES s RESISTANCE TEMPERATURE s I PRESS (PS I G) I NOTE 1 DETECTOR (RTD) ss NORMAL ~ -0 25"WG ATMOS 1 TEST-SIM I NA
~ I ABNORMAL -0.25"WG ATMOS 1 TEST-SIM I NA I IMANUFACTURER: PYCO sl ACCIDENT 2. 8 63 1 TEST-SIM I YES I esRH (%): I ~ ~ NOTE 1 IMODEL NO.: 122-4030-04-2.7-82.3 se NORMAL e 50 100 1 2 TEST-SIM s NA I ABNORMALI 50 I 100 1 2 TEST-SIM ~ NA I SAFETY FUNCTION: I I ACCIDENT ~ 100 STEAM 1 2 TEST-SIM I NA ~
I NOTE ~ NA ssRADIATION: I 1
~ I NORM GAMMA 1 ~ 1E6 1 N4 ACC GAMMA 2. 6E6 2.2E8 1 TEST-SIM YES I OP. CODE: B ee NORM BETA NA I 1 NA I II ACC BETA 1. 3E7 1 YES le NEUTRON NA I 1 NA I
IISPRAY NA YES s NA 2 TEST-S IM NA IACCUR4CY IISUBMERGENCE NA NA I NA NA NA NA SPEC: +/-1. 2F NOTE 5 DEMO: +/- i. 2F ~
~ ~ ~
I ~ ~ I ~ ~ IZONE NO.: SC196113 ~
~ ~ ~ I sSUBMERGENCE: ee DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
N OTES: 1.FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, s eSPR4Y: I I 1. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. I I CRITERIA, EQEDC-1, REV 1, MAY 2, 1984. 2. NORMAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS IEQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. ISUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY ss SDDF ¹ IEEE-07-145-5003 B THRU G OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FROM 30 I e I 3. EQUIPMENT OPER4BILITY TIME DATA SHEET: DAYS TESTED VALUE TO 100 DAYS PLUS FILE NQ. 33-2-C8 MARGIN BY ANALYSIS. I DOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: s I 4. SWEC CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-029 TERMINAL HEAD GASKET MUST BE REPLACED sACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT II I
~ ~
WITH A NEW GASKET WHENEVER HEAD COVER I I I
~ ~ IS REMOVED, IN ORDER TO M4INTAIN I
I I I I QUALIFICATION. I I I I I FACTORY CERTIFICATION TESTING OF RTD Ss I I
~
I I I HAS DEMONSTRATED ACCURACY OF (+/-1.0 Fe s M4INT/SURVEILL I ~ I ~ THE QUALIFICATION TYPE TESTING HAS
REFERENCE:
2 (NOTE 4) I I I I SHOWN AN ACCURACY QF +/-1.2 F. I
~ I I I A REVIEW OF THE SETPOINT CALCULATIONS I QUALIFIED LIFE ~
I I
~
HAS SHOWN THAT +/-1.2F IS AN ACCURACY'. I ACCEPTABLE (YEARS): 40 ~
~ I
REFERENCE:
2,4 I ~ I I
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
I I
~ ~ ~ ~
0 NINE NILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUNBER 50-410 SYSTEN CONPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF a'aa
¹ C041DBN REV 25-Nar-85 aa a z aaaaaaa a as" aaaaaaaaa aaaaa aaaaaa aaa aaa . aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaa aaaaa, s
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION s s s DOCUMENT REFERENCE s s a aa a aaaaa PARANETER I SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED QUAL I NARGIN s RENARKS SPECIfIED VALUE VALUE
'aaa-------a'--aQUALIFIED s
s s s s I METHOD DEMO s IEQUIP NO.: 2CMB+TE59C 'aaaaaaaaaaal---a- ---. = aaaaaaa-a
~
aaa s ~
~ ~ ~
sSPEC NO.: C041D IOP. TIME: s NA I >100 DAYS I 3 1 2 AN+DATA s YES s NOTE 3 l SYSTEM: CONTA INNENT s 'TaNP s E (F) s s s
~ s s NOTE MONITORING SYSTEM s I NORNAL I 104/85 s 150 I 1 I 2,4 I TEST-BIN s NA I NOTE 2 ABNORNALs 92 190 2,4 TEST-S IM s TYPE: (DESCRIPTION)
RESISTANCE TEMPERATURE I ACC I DENT I
'PRESS(PSIG) '
175; s 400 s I 1 1 2 s TEST-SIN I I NA YES ~ NOTE 1 DETECTOR (RTD) NORNAL I -0.2S"WG s ATNOS I 2 s TEST-SIN I NA ss s s ABNQRNALI -0.25"WG I ATNOS 1 s 2 s TEST-SIN I NA I sNANUFACTURER: PYCO ACCIDENT I 2. 8 I 63 s 2 s TEST-SIN s YES I s s IRH (/): s s s s
~ ~ NOTE I NODEL NO ~: 122-4030-04-2. 7-82 ~ 31 s NORMAL s 50 I 100 s 1 s
TEST-BIN NA s s I ABNQRNALI S0 I 100 s 1 I 2 s TEST-SIM sNA l ss ISAFETY FUNCTION: ACCIDENTs 100 s STEAM s 1 s 2 TEST-SIN NA I I NA 'ADIATION s ~ s s NOTE 1 s NQRN GANNA I 1. 1E6 s t 1 s s NA I s ACC GAMNA s . 2. 6Eb I 2. 2EG I 1 s TEST-SIN. s YES s OP. CODE: B I NORM BETA I NA s s s s NA s s I ACC BETA I 1.3E7 s s I YES s
~ NEUTRON ~ NA ~ 1 s s
s I NA s IACCURACY I 'PEC: +/-1.2F NOTE 5 ISPRAY sSUBMERGENCE s a s
~
aaa a NA NA I I YES NA aaaa I I NA NA I s NA 2 s'A TEST-SIN s s NA htA s I DEMO: +/-1. 2F s s s s I ZONE NO.: SC196113 s ISUBNERGENCE: DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1.FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, s ISPRAY: s 1 ~ EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DEBIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. s CRITERIA'QEDC-1 s REV 1 r NAY 2v 1984. 2.NORMAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS IEQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO I 2 ~ VEt'IDOR ENVIRONNENTAL QUAL IF I CAT IQN REPORT ~ NAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. IBUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY SDDF ¹ IEEE-07-145-5003 B THRU G 3.OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FRON 30 s s I 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TINE DATA SHEET: DAYS TESTED VALUE TO 100 DAYS PLUB s ~ FILE NO.33-2-CB NARGIN BY ANALYSIS. s DQCUNENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: I 4. SWEC CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-029 4.TERMINAL HEAD GASKET NUBT BE REPLACED s sACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588~CAT Is s WITH A NEW GASKET WHENEVER HEAD COVER I IS RENOVED, IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN QUALIFICATION. s
- 5. FACTORY CERTIFICATION TESTING OF RTD'Bs
~ HAS DEMONSTRATED ACCURACY OF (+/ 1 0 FI t'IAINT/SURVEILL- s s THE QUALIFICATION TYPE TESTING HAS
REFERENCE:
2 (NOTE 4) s SHOWN AN ACCURACY OF +/-l..2 F. A REVIEW OF THE SETPOINT CALCULATIONS IGUALIFIED LIFE HAS SHOWN THAT +/-1.2F IS Al'I I (YEARS): 40 s ACCEPTABLE ACCURACY. I
REFERENCE:
2>4 s s s s
NINE MIL OINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF ¹ C041DBN REV 16-Mar-85 s s s
~
s ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ~ s
~ ~
s s
~ DOCUMENT REFERENCE s Dxxseo a l PARAMETER s SPECIFIED l QUALIFIED ~ s QUAL e MARGIN t REMARKS VALUE VALUE SPECIFIED QUALIFIED METHOD DEMO ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s ~ ~ ~
EQUIP NO.: ~ ~ ~ e 2CMS+TE59D ~
~
s s
~ ~
s s ~ ~ s ~ ~ eSPEC NO.: C041D s sOP. TIME: ~ N4 ~ )100 DAYS t 3 s 2 AN+DATA e YES ~ NOTE 3 CSYSTEM: CONTAINMENT TEMP (F). s NOTE s s MONITORING SYSTEM NORMAL s 104/GS ~ 1SO e 1 I 2~4 s TEST-SIM ~ NA l NOTE 2 s ts ABNORMALs 92 s 190 s 1 s 2,4 s TEST-S IM s NA a I TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) l ~ ACCIDENT t 175 l 400 a 1 s 2 l TEST-S I M e YES I RESISTANCE TEMPERATURE 'PRESS(PSIG) ' ' ' s NOTE 1 DETECTOR (RTD) l1 NORMAL ~ -0. 25 "NG 'TMOS s 1 s
~ TEST-S I M s NA s
s ABNORMALs -0.2S"WG l ATt10S 1 s 2 ~ TEST SIM s NA ~ sMANUFACTURER: PYCO l l ACCIDENTs 2.8 l 63 t 1 a s TEST-S I M l YES s alRH (%): s s
~ ~
s NOTE 1 I MODEL NO. s 122-4030-04-2. 7-82. 3 ss NORMAL e 50 l 100 s 1 ~ 2 TEST-S I M t NA s ~ s ABNORMALs 50 l 100 s 1 s 2 s TEST-8IM ~ NA ~ SAFETY FUNCTION: ACCIDENTs 100 s STEAM ~ 1 s 2 e TEST-SIM s NA NA RADIATION ' ' ' ~ s s s ~ NOTE 1 s t a NORM GAMMAI 1. 1E6 e 1 e NA s s s ss ACC GAt1MA s 2.6Eb s 2.2EG l 1 l 2 s TEST-S IM ~ YES sOP. CODE: B se NORM BETA s NA e 1 NA s s ts ACC BETA 1.3E7 s 1 s s YES s
'ES e
s II NEUTRON s NA 1 I NA s s s ssSPRAY NA l NA l 2 s TEST-S I M t NA sACCURACY ssSUBMERGENCEe NA l NA ~ NA ~ NA s NA NA ~ SPEC: +/-1 ~ 2F NOTE 5 ~
~
s s DEMO: +/-1. 2F ~
~
s
~
s s s s s s t ZONE NO.: SC196113 s s
~ ~
sSUBMERGENCE: sl DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1.FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS,a sSPR4Y: t e 1 ~ EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT EQEDC-1, REV 1, MAY 2, 1984. 2.NORMAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS REFERENCED'RITERIA, sEQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO s e 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE sSUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY SDDF ¹ IEEE-07-145-S003 B THRU G 3.OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FROM 30 s e ~ 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TIME DATA SHEET: DAYS TESTED VALUE TO 100 DAYS PLUS s t s FILE NO 33 2 CG t1ARGIN BY ANALYSIS. l DOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: s s 4. SWEC C4LCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-029 4.TERMIN4L HEAD GASKET MUST BE REPLACED tACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT I ~ s s a WITH A NEN GASKET NHENEVER HEAD COVER s IS REMOVED, IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN s QUALIFICATION. s ~ S.FACTORY CERTIFICATION TESTING OF RTD'Sl s s
~ ~ ~ HAS DEMONSTRATED ACCURACY OF (~/-1.0 Fl ~ MAINT/SURVE ILL ~ ~
s s THE QUALIFICATION TYPE TESTING HAS
REFERENCE:
2 (NOTE 4) ~ s
~ ~ SHOWN AN ACCURACY OF ~/-1.2 F. ~ s A REVIEW OF THE SETPOINT CALCULATIONS s
sQUALIFIED LIFE
~ ~
s s
~
s H4S SHONN THAT +/-1 'F IS 4N (YEARS): 40 s
~ ~ ~ ACCEPTABLE ACCURACY.
REFERENCE:
2,4 s
~
s ~
~
s
~ ~
s ~ s s
~ ~
s ~
~ ~
s s
NINE NILE PQINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF ¹ C041DBO REV 0 18-Nar-85 sc
~ ~
s s ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPNENT DESCRIPTION s s
~
I s DOCUNENT REFEREI'ICE ls PARANETER s SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED QURL sMARGINs REMARKS SPECIFIED QURL IF I E D VALUE VALUE
- NETHOD DENO I s s a ~ a s I a EQUIP NQ.: 2CMS+TE67A s ~
s
~ ~ ~
s
~ ~ ~ ~ ----a=sam - - a as=a =as=
a aas= I SPEC NQ.: C041D I s OP. TINE: s 100 DAYS I )100 DAYS AN+DATA I YES I NOTE 3 sSYSTEM: CONTAINMENT alTEMP (F): a s s NOTE 1 MONITORING SYSTEM ss NORMAL 150/135 150 2~4 s TEST-SIM s NA I NQTE 2 II ABNORNALI 190 s 190 2~4 I TEST-SIN s NA s I TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) ACC I DENT s 270 s 400 2 s TEST-SIM I YES RESISTANCE TEMPERATURE s sPRESS(PSIG) I s NOTE 1 DETECTOR (RTD) iil NORNAL a .5 TO 1.0 a ATMOS TEST-SIN I NA I Iai ABNORMALI 2 2 2,4 ~ AN+DATA s NA s sNRNUFACTURER: PYCO s I ACCIDENTI 40 a 63 2 ~ TEST SIN i YES I s s I IRH (/): I s s I I ~ NQTE 1. I NODEL NQ.: 122-7039-314 ~ a NORNAL a 90 ~ 100 s TEST-SIN s NA s s II ABNORMALI zing 100 100 TEST-SIM s NA s ISAFETY FUNCTION: s I RCCIDENT i 100 .STEAN s TEST SIM ~ NA NONITOR SUPPRESSION POOL I s RADI AT ION: s s s I I a NOTE 1 s WATER TEMPERATURE ls NORM GAMNAI s s s s s s s s ls ACC GANNA 5. 5E7 2. 2EG s TEST SIN s YES s NOTE 6 a OP. CODE: A NORN BETA s a s ll s s ACC BETA I s s s s a~ NEUTRON I a s s s IsSPRAY s YES YES I TEST-SIN NA iNA a s IACCURACY I ~ SUBNERGENCEs <2 SEC 10 SEC 2v4 AN + DATA a s NOTE 7 SPEC: +/-1. 2F (NOTE 5) ~ i R DENO: ~/-1. 2F ~
~
a
~ s s s ~ ~ ~
I EONE NO.: PC215121 ~
~ ~ ~
s ISUBI'IERGENCE: YES DOCUNENT
REFERENCE:
. NOTES: 1. FOR COI'IPLFTE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, I ISPRAY: YES 1. EQUIPNENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIG N SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED.
CRITERIA t EQEDC-1 t REV I v MAY 2 v 1984 ~ NORMAL TEI'IPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS a ~ 2. VENDOR ENVIRONNENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. s SDDF ¹ IEEE-07-145-5003 B THRU G 3a OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FROM 30
- 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TII'IE DATA SHEET: DAYS TESTED VALUE TO 100 DAYS PLUS FILE NO. 33-2-C9 HARGIN BY ANALYSIS.
s DOCUNENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: 4. SWEC CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-029 TERMINAL HEAD GASKET NUST BE REPLACED ~ sACCEPTABLE TQ NUREG 0588.CRT I s
~
s s WITH A NEW GASKET WHENEVER HEAD COVER a saNOTES: (CONT.) IS REMOVED, IN ORDER TO NAINTAIN I s6.COMBINED RADIATION FOR GRNNA. BETA AND QUALIFICATION. s s I s NEUTRON FOR 40 YEARS OF QUALIFIED LIFE 5.FACTORY CERTIFICATION TESTING OF RTD Sl PLUS ACCIDENT INCLUDING APPLICABLE HAS DEMONSTRATED ACCURACY OF <+/-1.0 Fl I NAINT/SURVE ILL s iBETA REDUCTION l AND NEUTRON CONVERSION THE QUALIFICRTION TYPE TESTING HAS
REFERENCE:
2 (NOTE 4) IS 5.5E7 RADS. SHOWN AN ACCURACY OF ~/-1.2 F. s s s
~ ~ A REVIEW OF THE SETPOINT CALCULATIONS s QUALIFIED LIFE 117.THE RTD THERNOWELL IS ALWAYS SUBNERGED HAS SHOWN THAT +/-1 ~ 2F IS AN (YEARS): 40 TO MEASURE SUPPRESSION POOL WATER TEN- ACCEPTABLE ACCURACY.
REFERENCE:
2.4 PERATURE. THE RTD TERNINATION HEAD COVER IS SUBJECTED TO SUBNERGENCE FOR ONLY s s ~ I 2 SECONDS.
~ s ~ s ~ s s a
NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 0 OF 1 QUAL REF tt C041DBP REV 0 18-Mar-85 s
~
s
~ ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ~
s s s s DOCUMENT REF ERENCE s s s sl PARAMETER s SPECIFIED s QUALIFIED I QUAL l MARGIN t REMARKS
~ ~
s
~ a VALUE VALUE I SPECIFIED QUALIFIED s METHOD a DEMO s lEQUIP NO.: 2CMS+TE67B s s ~
s s s
~ ~ ~
s s s
~
lSPEC NO.: C041D s s OP. TIME: l 100 DAYS s )100 DAYS 2 l AN+DATA s YES s NOTE 3 sSYSTEM: CONTAINMENT alTEMP (F): s s s NOTE 1 MONITORING SYSTEM sl NORMAL 150/135 a 150 2,4 s TEST-SIM s NA s NOTE 2 s ABNORMALs 190 190 2~4 s TEST-SIM l NA I TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) ACCIDENT t 270 400 TEST-SII'l YES a
-I s s a s RESISTANCE TEMPERATURE l lPRESS(PSIG) s s
s s s NOTE 1 DETECTOR (RTD) tt NORMAL .5 TO 1.0 a ATMOS 1 2 TEST-SIM l NA s ABNORMAL s 2 s 1 2,4 AN+DATA l NA lMANUFACTURER: PYCO s a ACCIDENT s 40 63 1 2 l TEST-SIM s YES s s s tRH (/): s s s s NOTE 1 tMODEL NO.:122-7039-314 ss NORMAL a 90 a 100 1 2 s TEST-SII'1 s NA s
~ l ABNORMALs 100 l 100 s 1 2 ~ TEST-SIM s NA l SAFETY FUNCTION: ACCIDENT I 100 s STEAM s 1 2 a TEST-SIM I NA MONITOR SUPPRESSION POOL s s RADIATION: s s
s NOTE 1 WATER TEMPERATURE st NORM GAMMA s ll ACC GAMMA 5.5E7 2.2E8 2 s TEST-S IM ~ YES NOTE 6 IOP. CODE: INACCURACY A ls NORM BETA s s s s ss ACC BETA s s s s ss NEUTRON s s slSPRAY YES YES 2 ~ TEST-SIM s NA alSUBMERGENCE <2 SEC 10 SEC 2,4 s AN + DATA a NA t NOTE 7 SPEC: +/-1.2F (NOTE 5) s DEMO: +/-1.2F ~
~ ~ ~
s s
~ ~ ~ ~
t ZONE NO.: PC215121 ~
~
s
~
~ SUBMERGENCE: YES DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: i. FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, t aSPRAY: YES l s 1. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. s CRITERIA, EQEDC-1, REV 1, MAY 2, 1984 ~ 2.NORMAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS s s ~ s 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, I'IAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. s s ls SDDF tt IEEE-07-145-5003 8 THRU G 3 OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FROM 30
~
s l I 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TIME DATA SHEET: DAYS TESTED VALUE TO 100 DAYS PLUS FILE NO.33-2-C9 MARGIN BY ANALYSIS. l DQCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: 4. SWEC CALCULATION NO. $ 2177-EQS-029 4.TERMINAL HEAD GASKET MUST BE REPLACED aACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT I s
~ ~ ~ WITH A NEW GASKET WHENEVER HEAD COVER s
s l I NOTES: (COI'tT. ) IS REMOVED, IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN I lb. COMBINED RADIATION FOR GAMMA, BETA AND QUALIFICATION. s s NEUTRON FOR 40 YEARS OF QUALIFIED LIFE 5.FACTORY CERTIFICATION TESTING OF RTD'Sa s PLUS ACCIDENT INCLUDING APPLICABLE HAS DEMONSTRATED ACCURACY OF <~/-1.0 Fl l MAINT/SURVE ILL- BETA REDUCTION AND NEUTRON CONVERSION THE QUALIFICATION TYPE TESTING HAS
REFERENCE:
2 (NOTE 4) I s IS 5.5E7 RADS. SHOWN AN ACCURACY OF ~/-1.2 F. s
~
s
~ A REVIEW OF THE SETPOINT CALCULATIONS t QUALIFIED LIFE ls7 ~ THE RTD THERMOWELL IS ALWAYS SUBMERGED HAS SHOWN THAT +/-1.2F IS AN (YEARS): 40 as TO l'1EASURE SUPPRESSIOiN POOL WATER TEM- ACCEPTABLE ACCURACY.
REF ERENCE: 2,4 la PERATURE. THE RTD TERMINATION HEAD COVER s ll IS SUBJECTED TO SUBMERGENCE FOR ONLY ll s ~
.2 SECONDS. ~ ~
s ~ s s
NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEN CQNPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF ¹ C041DBQ 18-Nar-85 a aaaa REV
==-- -- a -- -=----= aaa aaaaa a a a aaazaaaaaaaaaa a aa- a ~ ~
a s ENVIRONNENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ~
~
s s ss a t I DOCUNENT REFERENCE I a a aas---- aa I I PARANETER s SPECIFIED s QUALIFIED s t QUAL tMARGINI REMARKS VALUE VALUE SPECIFIED QUALIFIED NETHOD I DENQ I EQUIP NO.: 2CNS>>TE68A s
~ ~ ~ a -a a a a ~ -- aaa a
a aaaaa s
~ a zaaa a a
a a-a--- -a s
~ -aa s a
a------- sSPEC NO.: C041D aOP. TINE: 100 DAYS >100 DAYS 3 2 AN+DATA YES I NOTE 3
-I s s ~ s s s s
~ SYSTEN: CONTAINMENT 'TENP (F) NOTE 1 MONITORING SYSTEN I s NORMAL I 150/135 s 150 s 1 I 2, 4 s TEST-SIN I NA t NOTE 2
~ s ABNORNALs 190 I 190 I 1 I 2,4 I TEST-SIN I NA a TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) ACCIDENTs 270 400 I 2 I TEST-SIN I YES - NOTE 1 s s 1 I s RESISTANCE TENPERATURE. I aPRESS(PSIG) s s I ' ~
DETECTOR (RTD) NORMAL a .5 TO 1.0 I ATNOS s 1 I 2 I TEST-SIN ~ NA s Is ABNORNALa 2 s 2 s 1 I 2,4 AN+DATA I NA <MANUFACTURER: PYCO s I ACCIDENT I 40 s 63 ~ 1 aa 2 a TEST-SIM 's YES s s s asRH (/): ~ s ~ ~ NOTE 1 I MODEL NO.: 122-7039-314 sl NORNAL s 90 I 100 I f ~ s TEST-SIM I NA as ABNORNALa - 100 s 100 I 1 2 TEST-SIM s NA ISAFETY FUNCTIONs t a ACCIDENT I 100 I STEAN s 1 s 2 TEST-SIM s NA MONITOR SUPPRESSION POOL s s RADIATION: I I I NOTE 1 WATER TENPERATURE as NORN GANNA's s
~ s ACC GANMA t S.SE7 I 2.2E8 I 4 I 2 s TEST-SIN t YES NOTE 6 sOP. CODE: A NORN BETA I ~ s s s s
s a ACC BETA s s s s s s NEUTRON s s s s s s s s ~ SPRAY I YES I YES I 1 s TEST-8 IN s NA I sACCURACY ~ ~ SUBMERGENCE s <2 SEC I 10 SEC 1 s 2 4 AN ~ DATA a NA I NOTE 7
+/-f a
SPEC: ~ 2F (NOTE 5) ~
~ ~ ~
DENO: +/-1. 2F ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
s ~ s I iONE NO.: PC215121 s
~ ~
s aSUBNERGENCE: YES DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
I'lOTES: 1 ~ FOR CONPLETE ENVERONNENTAL CONDITIONSil ISPRAY: YES ~ s 1. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVERONNENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. s CRITERIA, EQEDC-1, REV 1, NAY 2, 1984 ~ 2.NORNAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS
- 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, MAX DESIGN/AVERAGc ss SDDF ¹ IEEE-07-145-5003 B THRU G 3.OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FROM 30 s
s s a 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TEME DATA SHEET: DAYS TESTED VALUE TO 100 DAYS PLUS s s ~ FILE N0.33-2-C9 NARGIN BY ANALYSIS. a DOCUNENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: sa 4. SWEC CALCULATION NQ. 4.TERMINAL HEAD GASKET NUST BE REPLACED sACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT I s
~ ~ ~ WITH A NEW GASKET WHENEVER HEAD COVER s
s IINOTES: (CONT.) IS RcMOVED IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN s a6.COMBINED RADIATION FOR GAMMA, BETA AND QUALIFICATION. s s s I NEUTRON FOR 40 YEARS OF QUALIFIED LIFE 5.FACTORY CERTIFICATION TESTENG OF RTD'Sl s s PLUS ACCIDENT INCLUDING APPLICABLE HAS DEMONSTRATED ACCURACY OF <+/-1 0 Fl ~ s NAINT/SURVEILL BETA REDUCTION AND NEUTRON CONVERSION THE QUALIFICATION TYPE TESTING HAS RFFFRENCE: 2 (NOTE 4)' IS 5 'E7 RADS. SHOWN AN ACCURACY OF ~/-1.2 F. s s
~ ~ ~ A REVIEW QF THE SETPOINT CALCULATiONS t IGUALIFIED LIFE Is7.THE RTD THERNOWELL IS ALWAYS SUBNERGED HAS SHOWN THAT +/-1.2F IS Al'I (YEARS): 40 st TQ NEASURE SUPPRESSION POOL WATER TEN ACCEPTABLE ACCURACY.
s
REFERENCE:
2,4 s ~ PERATURE. THE RTD TERMINATION HEAD COVER IS SUBJECTED TO SUBNERGENCE FOR ONLY ss 2 SECONDS. s ~
~ s ~ ~ ~ ~
NINE MILE INT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUNBER 50-410 SYSTEN COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE i. 1'F QUAL REF ¹ C041DBR REV 16-Nar-85
-a--a-----------a----- aaaaa aaaaaaaaaaa aaaaahaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa --ag s
s s s ENVIRONNENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION s s s s I DOCUNENT REFERENCE s s s PARAMETER s SPECIFIED s QUALIFIED s I QUAL sNARGINI REMARKS VALUE I VALUE I SPECIFIED e QUALIFIED I METHOD I DENO s EQUIP NO.: ~ ~ ~ ~
~ 2CNSssTE68B ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
s s s ~ ~ s s ISPEC NO.: C041D I OP TINE ~ 100 DAYS I >100 DAYS I 3 I 2 e AN+DATA s YES s NOTE 3 TENP (F) ' NOTE sSYSTEM: CONTA INNENT i2,
~ I I ~ ~ I ~
MONITORING SYSTEM NORNAL I 150/13S I 150 e 1 I 2, 4 I TEST-SIN s NA ~ NOTE. 2 iABNORNAL s s 190 I 190 I 1 s 4 iTEST-SIN s ~ NA
~ TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) ACCIDENT I 270 s 400 e 1 i 2 ~ TEST SIN I YES RESISTANCE TENPERATURE 'PRESS(PSIG) ' NOTE 1 DETECTOR (RTD) NORNAL I 5 TO 1 ~ 0 s ATMOS s 1 ~ 2 ~ TEST SIN ~ NA s ~ ABNORMALI 2 ~ 2 I 1 ~ 2s4 s AN+DATA ~ NA ~
TEST SIN i2 NANUFACTURER PYCO ACCIDENTS 40 I 63 I 1 I 2 s YES I/I
~ ~ e s I /S ~ ~ s s
s s s s s NOTE 1 NO.: 122-7039-314 TEST-SIN I MODEL ISAFETY FUNCTION: I I s NORNAL iABNORNAL ACCIDENT
~
is s 90 100 100 i100 s s e 100 STEAN s s I 1 1 1 I s s 2 2 I s iTEST-SIN s TEST-SIN
~
I s NA NA NA s NONITOR SUPPRESSION POOL I RADIATION ~ ~ ~ I ~ I ~ NOTE 1 I WATER TENPERATURE ~ NORM GAMNAe s ACC GANNA s I 2 I TEST-SIN s YES NOTE 6
~ OP. CODE! A e NORN BETA s s s ~ ~ s ACC BETA s s ~ .
e NEUTRON I eSPRAY I YES YES s 1 s 2 s TEST-SIN I NA ~ s sACCURACY- eSUBMERGENCEI <2 SEC e 10 SEC I 1 I 2s4 I AN + DATA I NA e NOTE 7 SPEC: +/-1 ~ 2F (NOTE 5) s s I . DENO: +/-1 ~ 2F s s s ZONE NO.: PC21S121
~ SUBNERGENCE: YES DOCUNENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1.FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONNENTAL CONDITIONS, ~
~ SPRAY: YES I 1- EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONNENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED.
s s CRITERIA, EQEDC-1, REV 1, MAY 2, 1984 ~ 2.NORMAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS s I 2. VENDOR ENVIRONNENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORTs NAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. SDDF ¹ IEEE-07-145-5003 B THRU G 3.OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FRON 30 s s 3. EQUIPNENT OPERABILITY.TINE DATA SHEETs DAYS TESTED VALUE TO 100 DAYS PLUS s s FILE N0.33-2-C9 MARGIN BY ANALYSIS. IDOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: e 4. SWEC CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-029 4 ~ TERMINAL HEAD GASKET NUST BE REPLACED IACCEPTABLE TO NUREG OS88,CAT WITH A NEW GASKET WHENEVER HEAD COVER INOTES: (CONT.) IS RENOVED, IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN I 6 ~ CONB I NED RADIATION FOR GANNA, BETA AND QUALIFICATION ~ s NEUTRON FOR 40 YEARS OF QUALIFIED LIFE 5.FACTORY CERTIFICATION TESTING OF RTD Sl HAS DENONSTRATED ACCURACY OF <+/-1.0 Fs s s e PLUS ACCIDENT INCLUDING APPLICABLE NA INT/SURVE ILL s BETA REDUCTION AND NEUTRON CONVERSION THE QUALIFICATION TYPE TESTING HAS SHOWN AN ACCURACY OF +/-1.2 F. e s
REFERENCE:
2 (NOTE 4) IS 5. 5E7 RADS. A REVIEW OF THE SETPOINT CALCULATIONS e , ~ QUALIFIED LIFE I7.THE RTD THERNOWELL IS ALWAYS SUBNERGED HAS SHOWN THAT +/-1.2F IS AN e (YEARS): 40 e TO NEASURE SUPPRESSION POOL WATER TEN- ACCEPTABLE ACCURACY.
REFERENCE:
2,4 s PERATURE. THE RTD TERNINATION HEAD COVER IS SUBJECTED TO SUBNERGENCE FOR ONLY 2 SECONDS. s s s s s s s s
NINE MIL OINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF ¹ C041DBS REV 0 16-Mar-85 ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION DOCUMENT REFERENCE s s PARAMETER a SPECIFIED s QUALIFIED s QUAL ~ MARGINs REMARKS s s s s VALUE VALUE a SPECIFIED s QUALIFIED METHOD s DEMO s
~ s ~ ~
s EQUIP NO.: 2CMS+TE69A s
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a sas s ~ ~
sSPEC NO.: C041D ~ OP T I ME 100 DAYS s )100 DAYS 2 AN+DATA ~ YES s NOTE 3 TEMP (F): NOTE 1 s s s
~
sSYSTEM: CONTAINMENT s s s ~ ~ MONITORING SYSTEM NORMAL a 150/135 a 150 s 2,4 s TEST-S I M a NA a NOTE 2 s s ABNORMAL'CCIDENT 190 s 190 s I 2,4 I TEST-SI M a NA ~ s TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) I 270 400 2 s TEST-S IM YES s RESISTANCE TEMPERATURE s PRESS (PS IG) ~ s s
~
s s ~ ~ NOTE 1 DETECTOR (RTD) s NORMAL a ~ 5 TO 1.0 ATMOS s TEST-S I M ~ NA s s ABNORMALa 2 2 2,4 AN+DATA a NA s aMANUFACTURER: PYCO ACCIDENTs 40 s 63 s TEST-SIM s YES a
~ RH (%): ~
s s s s s s s ~ NOTE 1 l MODEL NO.: 122-7039-314 NORMAL 90 100 TEST-SIM s NA s 100 100 2 s TEST-SIM e NA lSAFETY FUNCTION: ABNORMAL'CCIDENTs 100 STEAM 2 ~ TEST-SIM s NA ~ MONITOR SUPPRESSION POOL a RADIATION: ~ s s s s s s NOTE 1 WATER TEMPERATURE s NORM GAMMAe s ACC GAMMA a 5.5E7 2. 2E8 ~ TEST-SI M YES NOTE 6 aOP. CODE: A a NORM BETA s s s ACC BETA s s s
~ NEUTRON s sSPRAY . YES YES 2 TEST-SIM NA-
~ ACCURACY sSUBMERGENCEs <2 SEC 10 SEC a AN + DATA NA NOTE 7 SPEC! ~/- 1 . 2F (NOTE 5) a s s DEMO: +/-1. 2F s s s s s s ZONE NO.! PC215121 s s eSUBMERGENCE! YES DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1 ~ FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, s sSPRAY: YES ~ 1 ~ EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. s CRITERIA v EQEDC-1 s REV 1 e MAY 2 s 1984 ~ 2.NORMAL TEMPERATURES, ARE SHOWN AS s s 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. s s SDDF ¹ IEEE-07-145-5003 B THRU G 3.OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FROM 30 s
- 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TIME DATA SHEET: DAYS TESTED VALUE TO 100 DAYS PLUS s
FILE N0.33-2-C9 MARGIN BY ANALYSIS. s DOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: 4 ~ SWEC CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-029 4 ~ TERMINAL HEAD GASKET MUST BE REPLACED sACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT Is WITH A NEW GASKET WHENEVER HEAD COVER s aNOTES: (CONT.) IS REMOVED, IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN
~ 6.COMBINED RADIATION FOR GAMMA, BETA AND QUALIFICATION.
NEUTRON FOR 40 YEARS OF QUALIFIED LIFE 5.FACTORY CERTIFICATION TESTING OF RTD'Sa s PLUS ACCIDENT INCLUDING APPLICABLE HAS DEMONSTRATED ACCURACY OF <~/-1.0 Fa I MAINT/SURVE ILL BETA REDUCTION AND NEUTRON CONVERSION THE QUALIFICATION TYPE TESTING HAS a
REFERENCE:
2 (NOTE 4) IS 5.5E7 RADS ~ SHOWN AN ACCURACY OF ~/-1.2 F. A REVIEW OF THE SETPOINT CALCULATIONS s QUALIFIED LIFE s l7.THE RTD THERMOWELL IS ALWAYS SUBMERGED HAS SHOWN THAT ~/-1 'F IS AN (YEARS): 40 TO MEASURE SUPPRESSION POOL WATER TEM- ACCEPTABLE ACCURACY.
REFERENCE:
2,4 s PERATURE. THE RTD TERMINATION HEAD COVER IS SUBJECTED TO SUBMERGENCE FOR ONLY 2 SECONDS. s
e NINE MIL OINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF ¹ C041DBT REV 16-Mar-85 s ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION s s e s DOCUMENT R EFERENCE ~ s
~ ~ a PARAMETER t SPECIFIED t QUALIFIED s QUAL sMARGIN REMARKS s VALUE ~ VALUE s SPECIFIED s QUALIFIED METHOD DEMO sEQUIP NO.: 2CMS+TE69B ~
s s s
~ ~
e s s e s e s ~ SPEC NO C041D t OP. TIME: t 100 DAYS t )100 DAYS t 3 AN+DATA s YES NOTE 3 eSYSTEM: CONTAINMENT 'TEMP (F) NOTE 1 MONITORING SYSTEM NORMAL s 150/135 s 150 t 1 2,4 s TEST-SIM s NA NOTE 2 a ABNORMALa 190 s 190 t 1 2,4 s TEST-S IM NA t TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) ~ ACCIDENTt 270 s 400 s 1 2 e TEST-S I M s YES RESISTANCE TEMPERATURE s PRESS (PS I 8) ~
~
s e e s NOTE 1 s DETECTOR (RTD) NORMAL e .5 TO 1.0 t ATMOS t 1 2 TEST-S I M s NA s ABNORMALt 2 e 2 s 1 2,4 AN+DATA s NA sMANUFACTURER: PYCO e s ACCIDENT ~ 40 s 63 s 1 2 TEST-SIM YES s s RH (/): s e s e e NOTE 1 t MODEL NO.: 122-7039-314 NORMAL s 90 100 TEST-SIM NA ABNORMALe s100 s s 100 s t 1 1 s e TEST-SIM TEST-SIM e s NA s SAFETY FUNCTION: ACCIDENTe 100 s STEAM s 1 ~ NA MONITOR SUPPRESSION POOL t RADIATION: s s s s s s NOTE 1 WATER TEMPERATURE e NORM GAMMAa e ACC GAt1MA ~ 5 'E7 s 2.2E8 e 4 2 TEST-8 It1 s YES NOTE 6 e OP. CODE: ~ NORM BETA ~ s s s s ACC BETA e s s NEUTRON ~ s s sSPRAY s YES t YES s 1 2 TEST-SIt1 <<ACCURACY sSUBMERGENCEt <2 SEC s 10 SEC s 1 2,4 AN + DATA NOTE 7 SPEC: +/-1.2F (NOTE 5) t s DEMO: +/-1 2F
~
s e s tZONE NO ~ . PC215121 s ~ SUBMERGENCE! YES s DOCUI1ENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1.FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, s tSPRAY: YES e 1. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESI GN - SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. s s CRITERIA, EQEDC-1, REV 1, MAY 2, 1984 ~ 2.NORMAL TEt1PERATURES ARE SHOWN AS s s
- 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE.
s SDDF ¹ IEEE-07-145-5003 B THRU G 3 ~ OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FROM 30 e s
- 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TIME DATA SHEET: DAYS TESTED VALUE TO 100 DAYS PLUS s FILE NO. 33-2-C9 MARGIN BY ANALYSIS.
t DOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: 4 ~ SWEC CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-029 4 'ERMINAL HEAD GASKET MUST BE REPLACED aACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT Is WITH A NEW GASKET WHENEVER HEAD COVER eNOTES: (CONT.) IS REMOVED, IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN a6.COMBINED RADIATION FOR GAMMA, BETA AND QUALIFICATION. s NEUTRON FOR 40 YEARS OF QUALIFIED LIFE S.FACTORY CERTIFICATION TESTING OF RTD'St PLUS ACCIDENT INCLUDING APPLICABLE HAS DEMONSTRATED ACCURACY OF <~/-I 0 Ft ~ MAINT/SURVEILL BETA REDUCTION AND NEUTRON CONVERSION THE QUALIFICATION TYPE TESTING HAS
REFERENCE:
2 (NOTE 4) IS 5.5E7 RADS. SHOWN AN ACCURACY OF +/-1.2 F. s A REVIEW OF THE SETPOINT CALCULATIONS t QUALIFIED LIFE e7.THE RTD THERMOWELL IS ALWAYS SUBMERGED HAS SHOWN THAT +/-1. 2F IS AN (YEARS)t 40 TO MEASURE SUPPRCSSION POOL WATER TEM- ACCEPTABLE ACCURACY.
REFERENCE:
2,4 PERATURE. THE RTD TERMINATION HEAD COVER IS SUBJECTED TO SUBMERGENCE FOR ONLY 2 SECONDS. s ~ e ~
~ e ~ e
NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 0 OF 1 16-Mar-85 QUAL REF
¹--C041DBU -s=---a REV-- -- -------a- ----s=----- a m--- -s=-aa == ===-=s-=====
s=
~ ~ ~
e ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION e ~, EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION e e
~
e e DOCUMENT REFERENCE e l PARAMETER s SPECIFIED l QU4LIFIED s e QUAL aM4RGINI REMARKS VALUE a VALUE t SPECIFIED s QUALIFIED s METHOD ~ DEMO s
~ e ~ ~s ss e ss s ~
lEQUIP NO.: ~ ~ e 2CMSssTE704 e e ~ e ~ e e e TIME )100 DAYS l 3 l 2 t AN+DATA l YES t NOTE 3 sSPEC NO.: C041D ~ OP t NA t sa ~ I TEMP (F) ' NOTE 1~
~ s ~
e e sSYSTEM: CONTAINMENT ~ s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ MONITORING SYSTEM s NORMAL a 104/93 s 150 l 1 s 2,4 l TEST-SIM I NA s NOTE2 e ABNORMALI 106 ~ 190 a 1 I 2,4 l TEST-SIM s NA a. TYPE! (DESCRIPTION) ACCIDENT l 200 400 t ' 2 TEST SIM l YES
- - ~ ~
t s ~
'PRESS(PSIG) ' ' t -e NOTE 1 I RESISTANCE TEMPERATURE s s s DETECTOR (RTD) NORMAL I-0. 25 "WG l ATMOS a 1 t 2 e TEST-SIM s NA e e
t ABNORMALl 0 25 "WG ~ ATMOS s 1 t 2 s TEST SIM t NA I aMANUFACTURER: PYCO tMODEL e e NO.:122-7039-314 I s I ACCIDENT I I /s ~ g NORMAL I ABNORMAL
~
e s
- 2. 8 SO SO e
~
e I
~
63 100 100 e
~
si s 1 1 1 s2 I e e
~
2 2 l I
~
TEST-SIM TESTS I M TEST SIM a iNA l e l YES NA e
~
e l NOTE 1 ~ SAFETY FUNCTION: i ACCIDENT s 100 s STEAM l 1 e 2 ~ TEST SIM ~ NA ~
'ADI4T ION NOTE s1 e e 1
s MONITOR SUPPRESSION POOL WATER TEMPERATURE iNORM GAMMAs 2E6 e 1
~
NA i'ES s a s e sACC G4MMA t a 3.2E7 ' I 2.2EB e
~e 2 ~ TEST-SIM a ~ OP. CODE: A s NORM BETA l NA 1 e
s l NA ACC BETA s 1 ~ 3E7 a s YES e NEUTRON I NA e 1 a s NA sSPRAY l NA l YES ~ NA ~ 2 ~ TEST SIM ~ NA eACCURACY ~ SUBMERGENCEs NA t NA s NA t NA ~ NA l NA SPEC: +/-1. 2F (NOTE 5) I DEMO +/ 1 2F e e sZONE NO.: SC196113 e e tSUBMERGENCE: DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1.FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, l sSPRAY: l 1. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. e CRITERIA s EQEDC-1 s REV 1 s MAY 2s 1984. e 2-NORMAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS lEQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. sSUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY SDDF ¹ IEEE-07-145-5003 B THRU G 3.OPER4BILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FROM 30 e e s 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TIME DATA SHEET:
~ DAYS TESTED VALUE TO 100 DAYS PLUS FILE NO.33-2-C9 MARGIN BY ANALYSIS.
iDOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: e 4. SWEC CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-029 4 ~ TERMINAL HEAD GASKET MUST BE REPLACED eACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT WITH A NEW GASKET WHENEVER HEAD COVER IS REMOVED, IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN QUALIFICATION. e S.FACTORY CERTIFICATION TESTING OF RTD'Sl e HAS DEMONSTRATED ACCURACY OF (+/-1.0 Fl MAINT/SURVE ILL THE QUALIFICATION TYPE TESTING HAS SHOWN AN ACCURACY OF +/-1.2 F.
~
REFERENCE:
2 (NOTE 4) e e A REVIEW OF THE SETPOINT CALCULATIONS ~ HAS SHOWN THAT +/-1.2F IS AN e
~ QUALIFIED LIFE s (YEARS): 40 ACCEPT4BLE ACCURACY'
REFERENCE:
2,4 ~ e e e e ~ s e e e
~ ~
e e e e e e
NINE MIL OINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF ¹ C041DBV REV 16-Mar-85
~
s s s ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION s
~ ~ ~ --~ s s PARAMETER s SPECIFIED s QUALIFIED s ~
DOCUMENT REFERENCE e s QUAL s s MARGIN s
~ REMARKS VALUE s VALUE l SPECIFIED s QUALIFIED l METHOD ~ DEMO I e EQUIP NO.: 2CMS+TE70B a s ~
a ~
~ ~ ~
s s
~ ~ ~ ~
aSPEC NO.: C041D s I OP. TIME: s 100 DAYS s )100 DAYS 3 4N+DATA ~ YES NOTE 3 ISYSTEM: CONTAINMENT s s TEMP (F): s a s s s NOTE 1 s MONITORING SYSTEM ea NORMAL 104/93 s 150 1 2,4 ~ TEST S IM ~ NA s NOTE 2 s ABNORMAL 106 190 s 1 a TEST-S I M s NA s s TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) ACCIDENT 200 400 s 1 s TEST-S IM s YES RESISTANCE TEMPERATURE l lPRESS(PSIG) a s a
~
s
~ s NOTE 1 DETECTOR (RTD) ~ l NORMAL -0.25"WG ATMOS 1 s TEST-S I M s NA s sl ABNORMAL -0.25"WG ATMOS 1 2 a AN+DATA e NA e lMANUFACTURER: PYCO ACCIDENT 2.8 s 63 s 1 2 s TEST-SIM ~ YES ~
s IRH (/): s
~ ~ ~
s NOTE 1 sMODEL NO.: 122-7039-314 es NORMAL 50 100 TEST-S I M l NA
'A 1
ABNORMAL 50 s 100 1 TEST-SIM s NA ~ SAFETY FUNCTION: ACCIDENT 100 I STEAM 1 ~ TEST SIM s MONITOR SUPPRESSION POOL s s RADIATION: a s s s
~ ~
s NOTE 1 WATER TEMPERATURE ~ s NORM GAMMA 2E6 1 s s se ACC GAMMA 3.2E7 2. 2EG 1 TEST-S I M s YES IOP. CODE: A Is NORM BETA NA 1 s s s s s s ACC BETA 1. 3E7 1 s s s sl NEUTRON NA 1 s s s s IsSPRAY NA YES NA 2 TEST-S I M NA s s s s sACCURACY elSUBMERGENCE NA NA s NA NA s NA s NA s NOTE 7 SPEC: +/-1. 2F (NOTE 5) ~ s DEMO: +/-1. 2F s
~
s s s a ZONE NO.: SC215122 s
~
s
~
sSUBMERGENCE: DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
N OTES: 1 ~ FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, I sSPR4Y: s I 1 ~ EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIG N SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. s CRITERIAs ECIEDC 1 t REV 1 ~ MAY 2~ 1984 ~ 2.NORMAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS IEQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO as 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. lSUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY SDDF ¹ IEEE-07-145-5003 B THRU G 3.OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FROM 30 ~ s s 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TIME DATA SHEET: DAYS TESTED VALUE TO 100 DAYS PLUS FILE N0.33-2-C9 MARGIN BY ANALYSIS. s DOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: ls 4 SWEC CALCULATION NO. 12177-'QS-029
~ 4 ~ TERMINAL HE4D GASKET MUST BE REPLACED aACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT I ~ ~ ~
s WITH A NEW GASKET WHENEVER HEAD COVER
~
s
~
s IS REMOVED, IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN QUAL IF I C4T ION. s ~ ~ s s s s s
~ ~ 5.FACTORY CERTIFICATION TESTING OF RTD'Ss s ~
a s
~ HAS DEMONSTRATED ACCURACY OF <+/-1.0 Fl s MAINT/SURVEILL- s ~
s s THE QUALIFICATION TYPE TESTING HAS
REFERENCE:
2 (NOTE 4) s
~
s s SHOWN AN ACCURACY OF +/-1.2 F. s s
~
s
~ A REVIEW OF THE SETPOINT CALCULATIONS s QUALIFIED LIFE s ~
a s HAS SHOWN THAT +/-1 ~ 2F IS AN (YEARS): 40 e s s s ACCEPTABLE ACCURACY.
REFERENCE:
2,4 ~ s a s
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s ~ s s ~ ~ ~
a ~
~ s
NINE NILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUNBER 50-410 SYSTEN CONPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHFET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF tt C041DBW REV 18-Nar-85 a a
~ ~ ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ~
a a
~
a DOCUI'1ENT REFERENCE a s PARANETER s SPECIFIED s QUALIFIED QUAL t NARGIN s RENARKS a a VALUE I VALUE s SPECIFIED ~ QUALIF I ED I t'1ETHOD ~ DEI IO I a EQUIP NQ.: 2CNS+TEI 01 ~ a a a a a ~ a a
~
a----- ---I -hlOTE1 s a a ~ a a a ISPEC NO.: C041D s QP. TINE: 100 DAYS )100 DAYS a 2 AN+DATA .I YES I NOTE 3 ISYSTEN: CONTAINMENT a TEMP (F): s a a I a MONITORING SYSTEM NORNAL s 150/135 I 150 I 2,4 a TEST-SIM s NA I NOTE 2 a s ABNQRMALs 190 I 190 s TEST-SIN s NA I a TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) ACCIDENT I 340 400 I I TEST-SIN a YES s RESISTANCE TEMPERATURE s PRESS (PS I 6) s a a NOTE 1 DETECTOR (RTD) s NORMAL s .5 TO 1.0 ATMOS a s TEST-SiM I NA a a ABNORNALa a 2 4 AN+DATA a NA INANUFACTURER: PYCO a ACCIDENTs 45 a 6 a 2 TEST-SIM s YES s sRH (/): s a I NOTE INODEL NO.: 122-4030-04-2.7-82.3l I NORMAL s 90 s 100 2 a TEST-SIN ~ NA a a ABNORNALI 100 s 100 2 I TEST-S IN s NA,s ISAFETY FUNCTION: ACCIDENT I STEAN s STEAN 2 s TEST-SIN I NA s MONITOR SUPPRESSIQN POOL s RADIATION: I a a
~ ~
NOTE 1 s WATER TEMPERATURE a NORM GAMMA' a a a a ACC GANNA ~ 4.2E7 2. 2F8 a a TEST-SIN s YES I NOTE 6 sOP. CODE: A NORM BETA a a a a a a a I ACC BETA a a a a a NEUTRON I a a a sSPRAY a YES YES a a s TEST-8 IN s NA s a
~ ACCURACY ISUBNERGENCEI NA NA a NA I NA s NA I SPEC: +/-1.2F (NOTE 5) I a a DEMO: +/-1. 2F a
a l20NE NO.: PC306713 a a a ISUBNERGENCE: YES DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1. FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, I aSPRAY: YES EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION Et'IVIRONNENTAL DESIG N SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. a a CRITERIA'QEDC 1v REV is NAY 2. 1984- 2.NORNAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS a
- 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT~ NAX DESI GN/AVERAGE.
s SDDF tt IEEE-07-145-5003 B THRU G 3.0PERABiLITY PERIOD EXTENDED FRQN 30 s
- 3. EQUIPNENT OPERABILITy TINE DATA SHEET-. DAYS TESTED VALUE TO 100 DAYS PLUS FILE NQ. 33-2-C9 NARGIN BY ANALYSIS.
s DOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: s 4 ~ SWEC CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-029 4 ~ TERNINAL HEAD GASKET MUST BE REPLACED I ACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588 s CAT I ~ a a WITH A NEW GASKET WHENEVER HEAD COVER sNOTES: (CONT.) IS RENOVEDs IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN a s6.CQNBINED RADIATION FOR GANMAs BETA AND QUALIFICATION. I a NEUTRON FOR 40 YEARS OF QUALIFIED LIFE 5. FACTORY CERTIFICATION TESTING OF RTD'Sl PLUS ACCIDENT INCLUDII'IG APPLICABLE HAS DENQNSTRATED ACCURACY OF (~/-1.0 Fs s NAINT/SURVEILL BETA REDUCTION AND NEUTRON CONVEPSION THE QUALiFICATION TYPE TESTING HAS I
REFERENCE:
2 (NOTE 4) a IS 4 ~ 2E7 RADS. SHOWN AN ACCURACY OF +/-1.2 F. a A REVIEW OF THE SETPOINT CALCULATIONS sGUALIFIED LIFE HAS SHQWhl THAT ~/-1.2F IS AN (YEARS): 40 ACCEPTABLE ACCURACY.
REFERENCE:
2,4 a a a a a a
~ a ~ a a ~ ~ ~
NINE MILE POINT UhlIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF QUAL REF (t C041DBX REV 18-Mar-85 Sic aaR cc
~ ~ ~ ~ ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION s ~ ~ ~
I s i DOCUMENT R EFERENCE sails aa RDea aac s a PARAMETER l SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED s s QUAL sMARGINs REMARKS VALUE SPECIFIED QUALIFIED METHOD aEQUIP NO.: 2CMS+TE102 s
~
s s
' s VALUE t ~
s s
~
s s s
---- ---= -=-----=-
s s s=~- s s s DEMO s s s s sSPEC NO.: C041D s s OP. T I ME: l 100 DAYS l >100 DAYS AN+DATA l YES l NOTE 3 asSYSTEM: CONTAINt'aENT 'TEMP (F) l -s NOTE 1 s MONITORING SYSTEM l a NORMAL s 150/135 s 150 s 1 s s 2,4 TEST-SIM s NA s NOTE 2 s sl ABNORMALi 190 a 190 s 1 TEST-S IM l NA s TYPE (DESCRIPTION) sl ACCIDENTl 270 l 400 I 1 TEST-S IM l YES RESISTANCE TEMPERATURE PRESS(PSIG)'s s NOTE s DETECTOR (RTD) NORMAL l .5 TO 1.0 s ATMOS l 1 2 s TEST-S IM l NA il ABNORMALl 2 l 2 s 1 2.4 AN~DATA s NA iMANUFACTURER: PYCO l l ACCIDENT s 40 63 1 s TEST-SIM l YES s 'RH (/) s s
~"
s
~ ~
s NOTE 1 sMODEL NO.:122-4030-04-2.7-82.3 ss NORMAL s 90 s 100 s 1 TEST-SIM I NA s ls ABNORMALI 100 I 100 I 1 s TEST-SIM l NA i a SAFETY FUNCTION: is ACCIDENTs STEAM i STEAM l 1 ~ TEST SIl'1 a NA s MONITOR DRYWELL AREA ssRADIATION: s s s s NOTE 1 TEMPERATURE si NORM GAMMA( s s s s ls ACC GAMMA l s5.4E7 s 2.2E8 s 4 TEST-SIM s YES l s NOTE 6 s aOP. CODE: A as NORM BETA s s I s s s si ACC BETA s s s a s sa NEUTRON s s lsSPRAY a YES l YES 1 TEST-S If'1 l NA I lACCURACY l SUBMERGENCEs
~ NA s NA I 1 s NA s NA SPEC: +/-1.2F (NOTE 5) ~
s
~
s DEMO: +/-1. 2F s
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
s ~ s l ZONE NO.: PC289681 s s
~
s s sSUBMERGENCE: NA DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
I'lOTES: FOR COMPLFTE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, s sSPRAY: YES EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION cNVIRONMENTAL DESI GN SEE THE DOCUMENT RFFERENCED ~ s CRITERIA~ EQEDC-i, REV 1. MAY 2, 1984 ~ 2. NORMAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS s a s 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, i'1AX DESiGN/AVERAGE. s sa SDDF tl IEEE-07-145-5003 B THRU G OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTEhlDED FROM 30 s EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TIME DATA SHEET: DAYS TcSTED VALUE TO 100 DAYS PLUS s FILE N0.33-2-C12 MARGIN BY ANALYSIS ~ s DOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: ~ l 4 SWEC CALCULATION NO 12177 EQS 029 TERtlINAL HEAD GASKET MUST BE REPLACeD s lACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT I ~
~ ~ ~ WITH A NEW GASKET WHENEVER HEAD COVER s INOTES: (CONT.) IS REl'10VED, IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN s l 16.COMBINED RADIATION FOR GAMMA'ETA AND QUALIFICATION.
s NEUTRON FOR 40 YEARS OF QUALIFIED LIFE 5.FACTORY CERTIFICATION TESTING OF RTD'Sl s s PLUS ACCIDENT IhlCLUDING APPLICABLE HAS DEMONSTRATED ACCURACY OF <+/-1.0 Fl i MAINT/SURVE ILL l ~ BETA REDUCTION AND NEUTRON CONVERSION THE QUALIFICATION TYPE TESTING HAS REFEREt'lCE: 2 (NOTE 4) s s IS 5.4E7 RADS ~ SHOWN AN ACCURACY OF +/-1.2 F. s s
~ ~ ~
s A REVIEW OF THE SETPOINT CALCULATIONS s QUALIFIED LIFF ~ s
~
s HAS SHOWN THaAT ~/-1.2F IS AN (YEARS): 40 ~ s s s ACCEPTABLE ACCURACY.
REFERENCE:
2.4 s
~ ~ ~
s ~ s s s a s s s s s s s ~
~ s
0 NINE NILE POINT UNIT 2 50-410 SYSTEN COMPONENT EVALUATION WORt( SHEET PAGE DOCKET NUMBER 1 OF 1 QUAL REF tt C041DBY REV 18-Nar-85
~ ~
s s ENVIRONNENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPNENT DESCRIPTION ~ s
~
s I DOCUMENT REFERENCE s ~ raararraarrarrrrarraraaaaarrra II PARANETER I SPECIFIED sQUALIFIED s t QUAL I MARGIN I REMARKS
~ ~
s
~ VALUE I VALUE I SPECIFIED s QUALIFIED NETHOD s DEMO sEQUIP NQ.: 2CMS+TE103 s s s I,raarararaar,arra aarrra 'rarrraassara ~
s s s s s ISPEC NO.: C041D slOP. TINE: 100 DAYS s >100 DAYS 3 2 AN+DATA YES NOTE 3 ISYSTEN: CONTA INNENT IITENP (F): s s s s s s NOTE 1 NONITORING SYSTEM NORNAL 150/135 s 150 2,4 TEST-SIN NA NOTE 2 s ABNORMAL 190 s 190 s TEST-8 IN s NA s ~ TYPE-. (DESCRIPTION) ACCIDENT I 340 ~ 400 2 s TEST-SIN YES RESISTANCE TEMPERATURE ssPRESS(PSIG) s s NOTE 1 DETECTOR (RTD) Is NORMAL I .S TG 1.0 ~ ATt'IQS s 1 2 s TEST-SIN ~ NA s sl ABNORNAL s 2 1 2,4 I AN+DATA s NA ~ sNANUFACTURER: PYCO I s ACCIDENT 45 63 I TEST-SIN YES ssRH (/): s s s s ~ NOTE sNODEL NO.: 122-4030-04-2.7-82.3 st NORMAL s 90 s 100 2 TEST-SIN NA s ls ABNORMAL 100 s 100 TEST-SIN s NA I SAFETY FUNCTIONs ACCIDENT STEAN STEAM 2 s TEST-SINAI TEST-SIM ~ NA s I s s MONITOR DRYWELL AREA s RADIATION: s s s I ~ s
~ NOTE 1 s s TENPERATURE ss NORN GAMNA s s s s ss ACC GANNA 5. 2E7 2. 2E8 s
I YES NOTE 6 s OP ~ CODE: A ss NORM BETA s s ss ACC BETA s Is NEUTRON s tsSPRRY YES YES ~ TEST-SIN sACCURRCY ssSUBNERGENCE NA NA s NA SPEC: +/-1 2F
~ (NOTE S) ~ s DENO: +/-1.2F s s ~
s s s s ~ s ZONE NO ~ . PC261641 s s
~ ~
ISUBMERGENCE: NA II DOCUNENT REFEREiNCE: NOTES: 1.FQR CONPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS~ I (SPRAY: YES s s i. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONNENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. CRITERIA, EQEDC-1, REV 1, NAY 2, 1984. 2.NORNAL TENPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS s I s 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMEI'(TAL QUALIFICATIGI'I REPORT, I'IAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. s ss SDDF tt IEEE-07-145-S003 B THRU G 3.OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FROM 30 s I I 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TINE DATA SHEET: DAYS TESTED VALUE TO 100 DAYS PLUS s FILE NO.33-2-C12 MARGIN BY ANALYSIS. s s DOCUI'IENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: s s 4. SWEC CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-029 4. TERMINAL HEAD GASKET N)UST BE REPLACED I sACCEPTABLE TQ NUREG OS88,CAT I ~ s
~
s WITH A NEII GASKET WHENEVER HEAD COVER
~
s s
~ IS REMOVED, IN ORDER TO NAINTAIN s ~ ~ ~ ~ QUALI F I CAT I ON. s ~
s
~ ~ 5.FACTORY CERTIFICATION TESTING OF RTD'Sl IsNOTES: (CONT.) HAS DEMONSTRATED RCCURACY OF (+/-1.0 F>>
I NAINT/SURVE ILL sb.CONBINED RADIATION FOR GAMNA, BETA AND THE QUALIFICATION TYPE TESTING HRS
REFERENCE:
2 (NOTE 4) s NEUTRON FOR 40 YEARS OF QUALIFIED LIFE SHOWN AN ACCURACY OF'/-1 ~ 2 F. PLUS ACCIDENT INCLUDING APPLICRBLE BETA A REVIEW OF THE SETPOINT CALCULATIONS s QUALIFIED LIFE - REDUCTION AND NEUTRON CONVERSION IS HAS SHOWN THAT +/-1.2F IS AN (YEARS): 40 s I 5.2E7 RADS. ACCEPTABLE ACCURACY.
REFERENCE:
2,4 ~ s s
~
s
~
s s ~
~ ~
s ~
~ ~ ~ s s s s s
0 NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF ¹ C041DBZ REV 18-Mar-85 s
~
a a ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ~
~ ~ ~
DOCUMENT REF ERENCE s
~ s wa a Mct sl PARAMETER SPECIFIED QUALIFIED QUAL l MARGIN l REMARKS QUALIFIED ar ra +as--
a a a a a
~ VALUE VALUE s SPECIFIED s ~ METHOD l DEMO a l EQUIP NO.: 2CMS+TE 104 ~ ~ ~ ~ a xx m a a s= , = saasaaaaaamsaaarmz-m--
a SPEC NO.: C041D s s OP. TIME: 100 DAYS )100 DAYS 2 l AN+DATA l YES s NOTE 3 sSYSTEM: CONTAINMENT saTEMP (F): a a a NOTE 1 MONITORING SYSTEM sl NORMAL 150/135 s 150 l TEST-SIM l NA s NOTE 2 ABNORMAL ~ 190 190 2,4 TEST-8 IM s NA s TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) ACCIDENT 340 l 400 2 TEST-S Il'1 l YES a PRESS (PS I 6) NOTE 1
~ a RESISTANCE TEMPERATURE s I a
a a a a a DETECTOR (RTD) ls NORMAL .5 TO 1.0 ~ ATMOS 2 a TEST-8 I M l NA a a al ABNORMAL a a 2,4 AN+DATA a NA I lMANUFACTURER: PYCO ~ l ACCIDENT a 45 63 ~ TEST-SIM s YES a a l I RH (%): a a a
~
a NOTE 1 I MODEL NO.: 122-4030-04-2. 7-82. 3 as NORMAL 90 s 100 2 s TEST-S I M a NA s a a sl ABNORMAL 100 100 2 TEST-SIM ~ NA I sSAFETY FUNCTION: ACCIDENT STEAM s STEAM s TEST-S I M a NA MONITOR DRYWELL AREA l s RADIATION: a a a a a a
~ a a I'lOTE 1 TEMPERATURE sl NORM GAMMA a a a
a sa ACC GAMMA 4.4E7 2. 2EG l TEST-S IM l YES NOTE 6 IOP. CODE: A ls NORM BETA a a a a a a II ACC BETA a a a a s a ls NEUTRON a a a a sISPRAY YES YES s TEST-S I M l NA IACCURACY s ~ SUBMERGENCE NA NA s NA NA SPEC: +/-1. 2F (NOTE 5> a a l DEMO: +/-1. 2F ~ a a a
~ a a ~
I ZONE NO.: PC261649 a a a
~
lSUBMERGENCE: NA DOCUMENT REFERENCE! N OTES: 1.FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, l (SPRAY: YES I ~ 1 EQUIPMENT QUALIF I CAT I ON ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. a l a CRITERIA, EQEDC-1, REV. 1, MAY 2, 1984 ~ 2.NORMAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS s l 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. a SDDF ¹ IEEE-07-145-5003 B THRU G 3.OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FROM 30 a l s 3 EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TIME DATA SHEET DAYS TESTED VALUE TO 100 DAYS PLUS FILE NO.33-2-C12 ' a a a MARGIN BY ANALYSIS. a DOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: I 4. SWEC CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-029 4.TERMINAL HEAD GASKET MUST BE REPLACED sACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT I a a a a WITH A NEW GASKET WHENEVER HEAD COVER
~ ~ ~
a IS REMOVED, IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN a a a a a QUALIFICATION ~ a a a lsNOTES: (CONT.) 5. FACTORY CERTIFICATION TESTING OF RTD'S I a a s l 6. COMB INED RADIATION FOR GAMMA, BETA AND HAS DEMONSTRATED ACCURACY OF <~/-1.0 Fl l MAI NT/SURVE NEUTRON FOR 40 YEARS OF QUALIFIED LIFE THE QUALIFICATION TYPE TESTING HAS IL'EFERENCE: 2 (NOTE 4) PLUS ACCIDENT INCLUDING APPLICABLE SHOWN AN ACCURACY OF +/-1.2 F~ BETA REDUCTION AND NEUTRON CONVERSION A REVIEW OF THE SETPOINT CALCULATIONS s QUALIFIED LIFE IS 4.4E7 RADS. HAS SHOWN THAT ~/-1.2F IS AN l (YEARS>: 40 ~
~
a a ACCEPTABLE ACCURACY.
REFERENCE:
2,4 a a a ~ a a
~ ~ ~ a a ~
a ~
~ ~ ~ a a a
NINE NILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUI'1BER 50-410 SYSTEN CQNPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF tt C04}DCA REV }8-Har-85 vRzss B'as
~ ~
a a ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION a
~ ~
a I I I a a DOCUNENT REFERENCE s ss as=asaa-aalu ss:s I I PARANETER s SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED I t QUAL I MARGIN s REHARKS a VALUE I VALUE a SPECIFIED s QUALIFIED I NETHOD s DENO s EQUIP NO.: 2CNSstTE}05 ssaa=aaa=-a=a=ms-.====-====<a===========-s=====<>=-=~a~===~~=~~ s= = ~ ISPEC NO.: C04}D s sOP. TIME: I 100 DAYS s )}00 DAYS a 3 s s AN+DATA s YES t NOTE 3 sSYSTEN: CONTA INHENT 'TEMP (F) a a a a a NOTE 1 MONITORING SYSTEM s s NORNAL t 150/135 s 150 I 1 i 2~4 a TEST-SIM s NA s NOTE 2 la ABNORNALI 190 190 2,4 I TEST-SIN NA a a s 1 a I s s TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) I s ACCIDENT I 340 s 400 s TEST-SIN I YES s RESISTANCE TENPERATURE 'PRESS(PSIG) NOTE 5 TO 1.0 TEST-SIN
's DETECTOR (RTD) NORMAL s ~ t ATNOS s I I NA a
a ss ABNORMALs 2 I 2 I 1 AN+DATA I NA aMANUFACTURER: PYCO ACCIDENT s 45 63 a 1 I TEST-S I M I YES ~ a a
~
a a a
~
a
~ ~ a NOTE 1 I NODEL NO 122 4030 04 2 7 82 3 s I NORMAL I 90 I 100 I 1 I 2 TEST-SIN a NA ~ ! t ABNORMAL s 100 a 100 1 s TEST-SIN s NA I SAFETY FUNCTION: ACCIDENT I 2 TEST-SIN s
MONITOR DRYWELL AREA s ~ RAD I AT ION i a STEAN I i s STEAN I a 1 I
~
I a a a a a NA I a NOTE 1 TEI'IPERATURE I I NORN GANNA I a a a a a a a ~ ~ ACC GAMMA I 6. 3E7 2 288
~ I 2 TEST-S IN a YES NOTE 6 s OP. CODE: A as NORN BETA ~ ~ I a
a a a a a as ACC BETA I a a a
'ES a a a a a ls NEUTRON s a a a a a
a a slSPRAY YES a } a s TEST-SIN I NA !ACCURACY silSUBNERGENCEI NA s NA a NA si NA NA s NA s SPEC: +/-1. 2F (hlOTE 5) a a
~
a DEMO: +/-1 . 2F ~ a
~ ~
a ~ ~ a a ~ (ZONE NO.: PC250619 ~
~ ~
a ISUBNERGENCE: NA DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1.FOR CONPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, I ISPRAY: YES a I 1. EGUIPt'1ENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONNENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUNENT REFERENCED. CRITERIA s EQEDC-1 s REV 1 s NAY 2s 1984 2.NORMAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS s s 2. VENDOR ENVIRQNNENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, NAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. a at SDDF tl IEEE-07-145-5003 8 THRU G 3. OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FRON 30 a a I I 3. EQUIPHENT OPERABILITY TINE DATA SHEET: DAYS TESTED VALUE TO 100 DAYS PLUS a FILE NO.33-2-C}2 MARGIN BY ANALYSIS. s DOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: sl 4. SWEC CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-029 4.TERHINAL HEAD GASKET NUST BE REPLACED sACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588.CAT I a a a a WITH A NFW GASKET WHENEVER HEAD COVER
's ~ ~ ~
a IS RENQVED, IN ORDER TO a a NAINTAIN'UALIFICATION. a a a a t 's NOTES: (CONT. ) 5. FACTORY CERTIFICATION TESTING'F RTD '8 I a 16 COMBINED RADIATION FQR GANNA ~ BETA AND HAS DEMOhlSTRATED ACCURACY QF <+/-}.0 Fl INAINT/SURVEILL NEUTRON FOR 40 YEARS OF QUALIFIED LIFE THE QUALIFICATION TYPE TESTING HAS
REFERENCE:
2 (NOTE 4) PLUS ACCIDENT INCLUDING APPLICABLE SHOWN AN ACCURACY QF +/-1.2 F. a BETA REDUCTION AND NEUTRON CONVERSION A REVIEW OF THE SETPOINT CALCULATIONS sQUALIFIED LIFE IS 6.3E7 RADS. HAS SHOWN THAT +/-1.2F IS AN (YEARS): 40 I I ACCEPTABLE ACCURACY. REFERFNCE: 2i4 a a a a
~
a
~ a ~ ~
a ~
~ a a ~
a ~ a a
NINE MILE POINT - UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1
¹ 18-Mar-85 QUAL REF C041DCB REV ------=-= aaraaaaa aaaaaaaaaararaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaarrraaaaaaaaaarcararaaaaaraaaraaaaraaaaraaa ~
s
~ ~ ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ~ ~
s s s ~ ss DOCUMENT REFERENCE ss s I I PARAMETER I SPECIFIED s QUALIFIED I QUAL s MARGIN I REMARKS IEGUIP NQ.: 2CMS+TE106
~ ,,rr ~
aaa ,carr VRLUE
',= r I VALUE I SPECIFIED ,aaaaaa ra I , ==
QUALIFIED I METHOD I laa rara aaa, ==- DEMO
, araaaaaaa = ar, sSPEC NO.: C041D ~ s OP TIME' 100 DAYS s )100 DAYS I 3 I 2 I AN+DATA s YES ~ NOTE 3 ISYSTEM: CONTAINMENT TEMP (F) ' ' I I s ~ NOTE 1 s s MONITORING SYSTEM s I NORMAL I 150/13S I 150 I 1 I 2,4 I TEST-SIM s NA I NOTE 2 s
s sl ABNQRMALs 190 I 190 s 1 s 2,4 I TEST-SIM I NA TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) ACCIDENTI 340 '400 2 TEST-SIM I YES s RESISTANCE TEMPERATURE-ss
'IPRESS(PSIG)l ----- s I
1 s
' - -- s s
I - - -I ~ NOTE 1 DETECTOR (RTD) NORMAL I ~ 5 TQ 1.0 I ATMOS I 1 I 2 I TEST-SIM I NA II ABNORMRLI 2 s 2 I 1 s 2~4 ~ AN+DATA s NR MANUFACTURER: PYCO I RCCIDENTI 45 I 63 I 1 s 2 I TEST-SIM I YES sI I\ ~ ~ s
/1 ~ ~
s s s
~ s I s NOTE 1 IMQDEI NO.: 122-4030-04-2.7-82.3 s I NORMAL s 90 s 100 I 1 I 2 I TEST-SIM I NA I ~ I ABNORMALI 100 I 100 I 1 I 2 I TEST SIM I NA I SAFETY FUNCTION: I I ACCIDENT STEAM STEAM 1 2 I TEST SIM NA s ~ ~ s ~
MONITOR DRYWELL AREA 'RADIATION ~ ~ ~ s s ~ ~ NOTE 1 s TEMPERRTURE Is NORM GAMMAs s I ~ ACC'AMMA I 4 4E7 ~ 2 2E8 s 4 ~ 2 I TEST SIM I YES I NOTE 6 sOP. CODE: A II NORM BETA s s s s s II ACC BETA s s s s s II NEUTRON s I s ssSPRAY s YES I YES s 1 2 TEST-S I M I NA s sACCURACY lsSUBMERGENCEI NA s NA I NA I NA s NA . I NA ~ SPEC: +/-1.2F (NOTE 5) ~ s s s ABNORMAL
~
I . DEMO: +/-1. 2F s s s
~ ~
s s
~ s s
sZONE NO.: PC240612 ~
~
s
~
ISUBMERGENCE: NA ~ s DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1.FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS~a ISPRAY: YES s I 1. EQUIPMENT GURLIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. s CRITERIA, EQEDC-l, REV 1, MAY 2, 1984. 2 TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS I I 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE.
~ I SDDF ¹ IEEE 07 145 5003 B THRU G 3.OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FROM 30 I s 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TIME DATA SHEET: DAYS TESTED VALUE TO 100 DAYS PLUS s
s FILE NO.33-2-C12 MARGIN BY ANALYSIS. I DOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: I ~ 4 ~ SWEC CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-029 4.TERMINAL HEAD GASKET MUST BE REPLACED s IACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT I WITH A NEW GASKET WHENEVER HEAD COVER IS REMOVED, IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN QUALIFICATION. s s I NOTES: (CONT. ) 5. FACTORY CERTIFICATION TESTING OF RTD'Sl s I lb.COMBINED RADIATION FOR GAMMA, BETA AND HAS DEMONSTRATED ACCURACY OF (+/ 1 ~ 0 F I
~ MAINT/SURVE ILL ~ ~ NEUTRON FOR 40 YEARS OF QUALIFIED LIFE THE QUALIFICATION TYPE TESTING HAS
REFERENCE:
2 (NOTE 4) s s PLUS ACCIDENT INCLUDING APPLICABLE SHOWN AN ACCURACY OF +/-1.2 F. s st BETR REDUCTION AND NEUTRON CONVERSION A REVIEW OF THE SETPOINT CALCULATIONS I QUALIFIED LIFE IS 4.4E7 RADS. HAS SHOWN THAT +/-1. 2F IS AN (YEARS): 40 ACCEPTABLE ACCURACY.
REFERENCE:
2,4 s s
~ s s ~ ~ ~
s s
~ s s ~ ~ s
NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF ¹ C041DCC REV 16-Mar-85 s
~ ~ ~ ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ~
s
~ ~ ~
s
~
s s DOCUMENT REFERENCE PARAMETER SPECIFIED QUALIFIED QUAL s MARGIN ~ REMARKS s e I ~ e VALUE 'ALUE s
~
SPECIFIED ~
~
QUALIFIED ~ METHOD ~ s DEMO ~ a s EQUIP NO.: 2CMS+TE107 ~
~
e s ~ s e s s ~ SPEC NO.: C041D OP. TIME: 100 DAYS a >100 DAYS 3 l 2 s AN+DATA ~ YES I NOTE 3 s sSYSTEM: CONTAINMENT s s s I TEMP (F): s s s
-s NOTE 1 MONITORING SYSTEM al NORMAL s 1 04/'P3 150 ~ 1 ~ 2 4 ~ ~ TEST S IM ~ NA s NOTE 2 ABNORt1AL 106 190 I 1 a 2,4 s TEST-SIM s NA e TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) s s ACCIDENT 200 400 s 1 l 2 s TEST-SIM l YES RESISTANCE TEMPERATURE s tPRESS(PSIG) e s NOTE 1 DETECTOR (RTD) NORMAL I -O. 2S"WG ATt1OS 1 2 TEST S I M ~ NA el ABNORMAL 25"WG ATMOS 1 2 TEST-8 I M s NA e sMANUFACTURER: PYCO ACCIDENT 2.8 63 1 2 I TEST SIM s YES s s sRH (%): s s ~ ~
s s NOTE 1 sMODEL NO.: 122-4030-04-2.7-82.3 es NORMAL 50 100 s 1 2 TEST-S I M I N4 s s ABNORMAL 50 100 s 1 2 TEST-S IM a NA s tSAFETY FUNCTION: Ies ACCIDENT 100 STEAM 1 2 s TEST-S I M s NA MONITOR SUPP CHAMBER AREA e s RADIATION: s s s s s NQTE 1 TEMPERATURE I NORM GAMMA 2E6 1 s N4 s
~
ls ACC GAMMA 3.2E7 2. 2L8 1 2 s TEST-S I t1 l YES s .. sOP. CODE: A Il NORM BETA NA 1 NA s II ACC BETA 1 ~ 3E7 1 s ~ YES s s
;, NEUTRON NA 1 s e NA e s ssSPRAY NA YES NA 2 s TEST-SI M ~ N4 s tACCURACY leSUBMERGENCE NA NEi NA s NA s NA N4 s SPEC: +/-1. 2F (NOTE 5)
DEMO: +/-1 ~ 2F ~ s
~ ~ ~ ~
s s s sZONE NO.: SC215122 ~ s
~
s eSUBt1ERGENCE: DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1.FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, a sSPRAY: s s 1. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. CRITERIAe EQEDC-1 s REV 1 o MAY 2 s 1984. 2.NORMAL TEMPERATURES 4RE SHOWN AS eEQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO 2 VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT,
~ MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE ~ ~ SUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY SDDF ¹ IEEE-07-145-5003 B THRU G 3.OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FROM 30 s l 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TIME DATA SHEET: DAYS TESTED VALUE TO 100 DAYS PLUS s
s FILE NO.33-2-C8 MARGIN BY ANALYSIS. l DOCUMENTATION 4CCEPTABILI TY: 4 ~ SWEC CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-029 4.TERMINAL HEAD GASKET MUST BE REPLACED sACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT I ~
~ ~
s WITH A NEW GASKET WHENEVER HEAD COVFR
~ ~ ~ ~ IS REI'IOVED, IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN s
s s s QUALIFICATION.
~ s S.FACTORY CERTIFICATION TESTING OF RTD'Ss HAS DEMONSTRATED ACCURACY OF <+/-1.0 ~ s ~ ~ ~ ~
Fl MAINT/SURVEILL ~ ~ THE QUALIFICATION TYPE TESTING HAS
+/-1.2 e s ~
REFERENCE:
2 (NOTE 4) ~ s
~
s SI.IOWN AN ACCURACY OF F. A REVIEW OF THE SETPOINT CALCULATIONS
'F s s ~
QUALIFIED LIFE
~
HAS SHOWN THAT +/-1 s s s
~
s s s IS AN (YEARS): 40 ~ s
~
s ACCEPTABLE'CCURACY.
REFERENCE:
2,4 s
~ ~
e s s
~ s s s s s ~ ~ ~ s ~ s ~ s
NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER SO-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF ¹ C041DCD REV 16-Mar-85
~
I
~ ~ ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ~ ~ ~
I DOCUMENT REFERENCE
~ PARAMETER s SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED s s QUAL ~ MARGIN1 REMARK+
VALUE VALUE SPECIFIED QUALIFIED METHOD DEMO s ~ ~ ~ I I I I I EQUIP NO.: 2CMSssTE108 ~ I
~
I ~ ISPEC NO.: C041D ~ OP TIME ~ 100 DAYS I >100 DAYS ~ 3 ~ 2 AN+DATA 1 YES I NOTE 3 sSYSTEM: CONTAINMENT ITEMP (F) I I NOTE 1 MONITORING SYSTEM NORMAL e 150/135 s 150 1 1 I 2,4 TEST-SIM s NA s NOTE 2 I ABNORMALI 190 s 190 s 1 l 2,4 TEST-SIM ~ NA 1 TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) RESISTANCE TEMPERATURE ACCIDENTS
'PRESS(PSIG) 270 s 400 I 1 I 2 TEST-SIM TEST-S I M ---I' l YES NOTE 1 DETECTOR (RTD> l 'ORMAL .5 TO 1.0 1 ATMOS s 1 l 2 s s NA ABNORMALl 2 s 2 s AN+DATA I NA eMANUFACTURER: PYCO ACCIDENT l 40 I 63 1 1 l 2 TEST-SIM 1 YES I I /s ~ ~
I I NOTE 1 sMODEL NO.: 122-4030-04-2. 7-82. 3 ~ NORMAL l 90 s 100 l 1 I 2 TEST-SIM I NA I ABNORMALI 100 1 100 s 1 s 2 TEST-S IM I NA sSAFETY FUNCTION: s ACCIDENT ~ 100 l STEAM s 1 I 2 TEST-S I M l NA I RAD I AT ION: NOTE
~ ~
MONITOR SUPP CHAMBER AREA ~ I 1 TEMPERATURE s NORM GAMMA' I I I I ACC GAMMA s 5. SE7 2.2EG s 4 I 2 s TEST-S I M l YES NOTE 6 sOP. CODE: INACCURACY A s NORM BETA ~ I I I I ACC BETA I I I I I NEUTRON I I I lSPRAY YES s YES s 1 I 2 s TEST-8 I M 1 NA sSUBI'1ERGENCE ~ <2 SEC s 10 SEC I 1 s 2s4 I AN + DATA s NA I SPEC: +/-1. 2F (NOTE 5 ) ~ DEMO: +/-1 ~ 2F I I I I I I I sZONE NO.: I I ISUBMERGENCE: s DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1 ~ FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, I sSPRAY: 1 ~ EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. CRITERIA I EQEDC-1 s REV 1 s MAY 2 s 1984 ~ 2.NORMAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHQNN AS
~ 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE.
SDDF ¹ IEEE-07-145-5003 B THRU G 3.OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FROM 30 EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TIl'1E DATA SHEET: DAYS TESTED VALUE TO 100 DAYS PLUS FILE NO.33-2-C13 MARGIN BY ANALYSIS 1 DOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: 4. SWEC CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-029 4 ~ TERMINAL HEAD GASKET MUST BE REPLACED
~ ACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT WITH A NEN BASKET NHENEVLR HEAD COVER I
I l NOTES: (CONT. > IS REMOVED, IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN I lb.COMBINED RADIATION FOR GAMMA, BETA AND QUALIFICATION ~ I I ~ NEUTRON FOR 40 YEARS OF QUALIFIED LIFE 5.FACTORY CERTIFICATION TESTING OF RTD Sl PLUS ACCIDENT INCLUDING APPLICABLE HAS DEMONSTRATED ACCURACY OF <+/-1.0 Fs MAINT/SURVEILL BETA REDUCTION AND NEUTRON CONVERSION THE QUALIFICATION TYPE TESTING HAS
+/-1.2 s
REFERENCE:
2 (NOTE 4) IS 5.5E7 RADS. SHONN AN ACCURACY OF F. A REVIEW OF THE SETPOINT CALCULATIONS s QUALIFIED LIFE HAS SHONN THAT +/-1.2F IS AN (YEARS): 40 ACCEPTABLE ACCURACY.
REFERENCE:
2,4 ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
I I I ~
~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~
NINE NILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUNBER 50-410 SYSTEN CONPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF ¹ C041DCE REV ih-Mar-85 ENVIRONNENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION I EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ~ I ~
~ ~ ~ DOCUNENT REFERENCE ~ s PARAMETER 'PECIFIED s QUALIFIED I QUAL s NARGIN e RENARKS VALUE I VALUE I SPECIFIED s QUALIFIED l NETHQD I DENQ e I I I I EQUIP NO.: 2CNSssTE 109 I I Ct I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
I ISPEC NO.: C041D I s OP. TINE: I 100 DAYS l >100 DAYS ~ 3 s 2 l AN+DATA ~ YES I NOTE 3 ISYSTEM: CONTAINNENT ~ ~ Ts=MD sc's I I I I I NOTE 1 I NONITORING SYSTEM NORNAL I 150/13S s 150 s 1 s 2,4 TEST-SIN e NA I NOTE 2 as ABNORNALs 190 s 190 s 1 s 2,4 s TEST-S I M s NA I TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) sl 4CC1DENTs 270 l 400 I 1 s 2 I TEST-SIN ~ YES RESISTANCE TEMPERATURE 'PRESS(PSIG) ' ~ I I NOTE 1 DETECTOR (RTD) Is NORMAL s ~ 5 TO 1 ~ 0 l ATMOS s 1 s TEST S IN ~ NA ~ ss ABNORNAL ~ 2 I 2 I 1 s 2,4 s AN+DATA e NA INANUFACTURER: PYCO I I ACCIDENTs 40 ~ 63 s 1 s TEST-SIN l YES I s 'RH
~ I (/) I I
I I I I
~ ~ ~
I NOTE 1 INODEL NO.: 122-4030-04-2.7-82.3ll NORMAL l 90 l 100 l 1 I 2 s TEST-SIN I NA I I ~ s ABNQRNAL>> 100 I 100 I 1 l 2 s TEST-SIN s NA sSAFETY FUNCTION: ACCIDENTl 100 l STEAM l 1 I 2 s TEST-SIN I NA NONITOR SUPP CHANBER AREA RADIATION I I I NOTE 1 TEMPERATURE I ~ NORM GANNAs I I I I ls ACC GANNA s
" 5.5E7 s 2. 2E8 s 4 ~ TEST SIN I YES NOTE 6 I I I OP. CODE: A ~ s NORM BETA e I I I I I I sl ACC BETA I '0 I I NEUTRON 's4 I I I
I SPRAY YES YES 1 I 2 I TEST-SIN l NA
~ ~ s s lACCURACY IISUBNERGENCEI <2 SEC SEC I 1 I AN ~ DATA ~ N4 SPEC: +/-1. 2F (NOTE S) ~ ~ ~
I DEMO: +/-1. 2F I I
~ I I
I ~ I I I s ZONE NO.: PC215121 ~
~ ~ ~
sSUBNERGENCE: YES DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1 ~ FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONSsl ISPRAYz YES I I 1. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONNENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. CRITERIAs EQEDC 1s REV 1s NAY 2s 1984 ~ 2.NORNAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS I I ~ 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QU4LIFICATION REPORT, MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. I SDDF ¹ IEEE-07-145-5003 B THRU G 3.OPERABILITY PERIOD -EXTENDED FROM 30 s ~ 3 EQUIPI'IENT OPERABILITY TIME DAT4 SHEET DAYS TESTED VALUE TO 100 DAYS PLUS a s FILE NO.33-2-C13 MARGIN BY ANALYSIS. I DOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: I 4. s SWEC CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-029 4.TERNINAL HEAD GASKET MUST BE REPLACED sACCEPTABLE TQ NUREG 0588,CAT Iss WITH A NEW GASKET WHENEVER HE4D COVER I asNOTES: (CONT.) IS RENOVEDs IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN I I b. COMBINED RADIATION FOR GANNA, BETA AND QUALIFICATION. s I NEUTRON FOR 40 YEARS OF QUALIFIED LIFE 5 FACTORY CERTIFICATION TESTING OF RTD 8 s I PLUS ACCIDENT INCLUDING APPLICABLE HAS DENONSTRATED ACCURACY OF (+/-1.0 Fl l NA INT/SURVE ILL I e BETA REDUCTION AND NEUTRON CONVERSION THE QUALIFICATION TYPE TESTING HAS
REFERENCE:
2 (NOTE 4) IB 5. 5E7 RADS. SHOWN AN ACCURACY OF +/-1. 2 F. I I ~ I I A REVIEW OF THE SETPOINT CALCULATIONS s QUALIFIED LIFE ~ I
~ I HAS SHOWN THAT +/-1. 2F IS AN ~ I (YEARS): 40 ~ ~ ACCEPTABLE ACCURACY.
REFERENCE:
2,4 I I
~ ~
I I I ~
~ I ~ I ~ ~
I ~
~ ~ ~ ~
NINE NILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUNBER.50-410 SYSTEN CONPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QURL REF ¹ C041DCF REV 18-Nar-85 Dc% x c I Ra Rp cia I
~ ~
I
~ ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION '
I EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ~
~ I DOCUNENT REFERENCE
'- curn m mma
~
I
~
l PARANETER s SPECIFIED I s QUALIFIED s t s QUAL l MARGIN s REMARKS VALUE l VALUE t SPECIFIED s QUALIFIED l NETHOD s DEMO sEQUIP NO.: 2CMS+TE116 I 2 R c R B R Raeseea I I I SPEC NO.: C041D ~ l OP TINE l 100 DAYS s >100 DAYS I 3 a 2 l AN+DATA ~ YES i NOTE 3 ISYSTEN: CONTAINNENT ~ ~ TENP (F) ' ~ i ~ NOTE 1 MONITORING SYSTEM ss NORMAL s 150/13S s 150 s 1 I 2,4 l TEST-SIM s NA t NOTE 2 ss ABNORNALI 190 s 190 t 1 s 2,4 ei TEST-SIN s NA I TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) ll ACCIDENTs 340 l 400 1 2 TEST-S IM I YES RESISTANCE TEMPERATURE 'PRESS(PSIG) NOTE DETECTOR (RTD) NORMAL
'l s .S TO 1.0 I ATMOS I 1 I e TEST-SIN I NA I I
ls ABNORMRLI 2 I 2 ~ AN+DATA l NA lNANUFACTURER: PYCO I I ACCIDENTs 45 s 63 I 1 I 2 TEST-S IN l YES I I I I I NOTE 1 lNODEL NO.: 122-4030-04-2.7-82.3 ls NORNAL I 90 I 100 1 I 2 ~ TEST S IN 6 NA
~ s ABNORMALI 1 00 l 1 00 ~ 1 ~ 2 l TEST SIM s NA I lSAFETY FUNCTION: >il ACCIDENTl STEAM I STEAM s TEST-SIN s NA l I
NONITOR SUPP CHANBER AREA 'RADIATION I I
~
NOTE 1 TEMPERATURE ll NORM GANMAl I I ACC GANNA 4.2E7 2.2E8 s 4 l 2 l TEST-S I M s YES NOTE 6 I I I sOP. CODE: A NQRN BETA s I I I I I I I I I el ACC BETA s I I I I I ss NEUTRON I ltSPRAY I YES s YEB I I 2 TEST-S IN I NA IACCURACY ~ ~ SUBMERGENCE ~ NA t NA s NA ~ NA NA eNA s SPEC: +/-1.2F (NOTE 5) I I I ~ DENO: +/-1. 2F ~ I
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
sZONE NO.: PC306713 ~
~ ~ ~
~ SUBMERGENCE: NA DOCUNENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1. FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONNENTAL COND ITIOiNS, a ISPRAY: YES s l 1. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRQNNENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUNENT REFERENCED. CRITERIA> EQEDC-1 i REV 1 e MAY 2t 1984 ~ 2.NORNAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS I I s a 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTRL QUALIFICATION REPORT. NRX DESIGN/AVERAGE. I SDDF ¹ IEEE-07-145-5003 B THRU G 3.OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FRON 30 I s l 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TINE DATA SHEET: DAYS TESTED VALUE TO 100 DAYS PLUS I I FILE N0.33-2-C(2 MARGIN BY ANALYSIS. IDQCUNENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: a s 4. SWEC CALCULATION NO. 4.TERMINAL HEAD GASKET NUST BE REPLACED tACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CRT I I II
~
WITH A NEW GASKET WHENEVER HEAD COVER I saNOTES: (CONT.) IS REMOVED, IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN I l sb.CONBINED RADIATION FOR GAMNA, BETA AND QUALIFICATION~ I I l l NEUTRON FOR 40 YEARS OF QUALIFIED LIFE 5.FACTORY CERTlFICATION TESTING OF RTD'Sl I I PLUS ACCIDENT INCLUDING APPLICABLE HAS DEMONSTRATED ACCURACY OF <+/-1.0 Fl l NAINT/SURVEILL- BETA REDUCTION AND NEUTRON CONVERSION THE QUALIFICATION TYPE TESTING HAS
REFERENCE:
2 (NOTE 4) l I IS 4. 2E7 RADS. SHOWN AN RCCURACY OF +/-1 ~ 2 F.
~ ~ ~ ~ A REVIEW OF THE SETPOINT CALCULATIONS I QUAL IF IED LIFE I ~ ~ ~ HAS SHOWN THAT ~/-1. 2F IS AN I
(YEARS): 40 ~
~ I ACCEPTABLE ACCURACY.
REFERENCE:
2,4 I ~ I ~ I I I ~
~ ~ ~ I ~ ~
I ~ I ~
~ I
NINE HILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUNBER 50-410 SYSTEN CONPONENT EVALUATION WORK PAGE 1 OF QUAL REF N C041DCG REV 18-Mar-85 ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION DOCUMENT REFERENCE I PARA!'iETER a SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED QUAL s MARGIN ~ REMARKS I I I VALUE VALUE s SPECIFIED s GUALIFIED ~ NETHOD ~ DEMO I EQUIP NO.: 2CMS+TE 1 I? I I
~ ~
I I I I SPEC NO.: C041D s OP ~ TINE: 100 DAYS >100 DAYS 3 AN+DATA YES s NOTE 3 ISYSTEN: CONTAINNENT I TEMP (F): I ~ I I NOTE 1 NONITQRING SYSTEM NORMAL 150/135 s 1SO I 1 2,4 TEST-SIM s NA s NOTE 2 ABNORNALl 190 190 I 1 2,4 TEST-SIN I NA I I TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) ACCIDENT I 340 I 400 TEST-SIN I YES I s RES I STANCE TENPERATURE s PRESS (PSI G) s I ~ ~ NOTE DETECTOR (RTD) a NORNAL I .5 TO 1.0 ATMOS I 1 TEST-BIN I NR s ABNORMALI 2 I RN+DATA NA INANUFACTURER: PYCO ~ ACCIDENTI 45 I 63 1 2 TEST-S IN s YES I I I IRH (/): I I I I I I NOTE 1 >>MODEL NO.: 122-4030-04-2.7-82.3 ~ I NORMAL I 90 I 100 I 1 TEST-SIN sNA l a I I ABNORNAL ~ 100 I 100 I 1 TEST-SIH NA I SAFETY fUNCTION: a ACCIDENTS STEAM STEAM 2 TEST-SIN ~ NA I I I MONITOR DRYWELL AREA I RADIATION: I I ~ NOTE 1 I TEMPERATURE I >>NORM GAMMAI s I I I I I s ACC GANNA s 5.4E7 2 2E8 TEST-SIN YES NOTE 6 I I lOP. CODE: A s NORI4 BETA s I I I I ACC BETA I a NEUTRON I >>SPRAY I YES YES .1 TEST-8 IM NA aACCURACY I lSUBNERGENCEl NR NA I NA NA NA NA SPEC: +/-1.2F (NOTE 5) ~ DENO: +/-1.2F aZONE NO.: PC289681 I ISUBNERGENCE: SCEN DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1.FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, l ISPRAY: YES a 1. EQUIPNENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMEt'ITAL DESI GN SEE THE DQCUNENT REFERENCED. I I CRITERIA, EQEDC-i, REV 1, NAY 2, 1984 ~ 2.NORMAL TEI4PERATURES ARE SHOWN AS I I
- 2. VENDOR ENVIRONHENTAL QUALIF CATION REPORT, NAX DESIGN/AVERAGE.
I SDDF tt IEEE-07-145-5003 B THRU G 3.OPERABILITY PERIQD EXTENDED FRQN 30 s 3. EGUIPNENT OPERABILiTY TINE DATA SHEET: DAYS TESTED VALUE TO 100 DAYS PLUS I FILL= NO. 33-2-C12 HARBIN BY ANALYSIS.
~ DOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: ~ 4~ SNEC CALCULATION NO 12177 EQS 029 4.TERNINAL HEAD GASKET NUST BE REPLACED lACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT (41TH A NEI4 GASKET I4HENEVER HEAD COVER I
INOTES: (CONT.) IS REMOVED> IN ORDER TO NAINTAIN I l 6. CONBINFD RADIATION FOR GAMMA, BETA AND QUALIFICATION. NEUTRON FOR 40 YEARS QF QUALIFIED LIFE 5. FACTORY CERTIFICATION TESTING OF RTD'Ss I PLUS ACCIDENT INCLUDING APPLICABLE HAS DEMONSTRATED ACCURACY OF (~/-1 ~ 0 Fl I HA INT/SURVE ILL- BETA REDUCTIQN Ah!D NEUTRON CONVERSION THE QUALIFICATION TYPE TESTING HAB
REFERENCE:
2 (NOTE 4) IS 5.4E? RADS. SHO(4N AN ACCURACY OF +/-1.2 F. A REVIE(4 OF THE SETPOINT CALCULATIONB I QUALIFIED LIFE-(YEARB): 40 I I HAS SHO(4N THAT ~/-1 RCCEPTABLE ACCURACY.
'F IS AN REFERFNCE: 2,4 I I ~ ~ ~
I ~
~ ~ ~ I I I ~ ~
I I
NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF ¹ C041DCH REV' 18-Mar-85
~ ~ ~ ~ ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ~
I
~ ~ -- -- DOCUMENT REFERENCE ~ ~
~ m =- m=ms --ws= '~ I
~
PARAMETER SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED a QUAL I MRRG IN I REMARKS
~
VRLUE VALUE SPECIFIED QUALIFIED METHOD DEMO EQUIP NO.: 2CMS+TE118
~ ~
s I
~
I ----I= ~ I I I
~
I
~ ~
I
~
I ' I I I
~
I s SPEC NO.: SYSTEM: C041D CONTAINMENT MONITORING SYSTEM I I
~ ~
OP. TIME: TEMP(F)s----- NORMAL I s 100 DAYS 150/135 s I s
)100 150 DAYS - s I
I 3 1 2,4
~
s AN+DATA TEST-S I M I I I YES NA I I
~
I NOTE NOTE NOTE 3 1 2 ABNORMALI 190 s 190 I 1 F 4 TEST-S I M I NA I TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) sa ACCIDENTI 340 I 400 a 1 s TEST-S I M I YES s RESISTANCE TEMPERATURE I IPRESS(PSIG) ~ I I I I I NOTE 1 DETECTOR (RTD) NORMAL I .5 TO 1.0 I ATMOS a 1 s TEST-S I M I NA I II ABNORMAL' I 2 s 1 s AN+DATA I NA I sMANUFACTURER: PYCQ ls ACCIDENTs 45 I 63 I 1 TEST-SIM I YES I I IRH (/): ~ I I I ~ ~ I NOTE sMODEL NO.: 122-4030-04-2.7-82.3 II NORMAL I 90 I 100 I 1 TEST-SIM I NA ls ABNORMALI 100 a 100 s 1 TEST-SIM ~ NA a SAFETY FUNCTION: ACCIDENTI STEAM I STEAM I TEST-S I M I NA I MONITOR DRYWELL AREA 'RADIATION ~ I I I I I NOTE 1 TEMPERATURE aaaNQRM GAMMA( I I I I I
~ I ACC GAMMA I 4.4E7 I 2.2EG s 4 ~ TEST-SIM I YES NOTE 6 OP. CODE: Is NORM BETA a I I
ACC BETA I I I I I I
" I I ~ NEUTRON s I I I I SPRAY YES I YES I 1 TEST-SIM I NA ACCURRCY- lsSUBMERGENCEI I'IA I NA I NA NR I NA I SPEC: +/-1. 2F (NOTE S) ~ ~ ~
I DEMO: +/-1 ~ 2F ~
~
I
~ ~ I ~ I ZONE NO.: PC261649 I I ~ I I SUBMERGENCE: N4 DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1. FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIQNS, I SPRAY: YES I I 1. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIG N SEE THE DOCUMENT CRITERIA'QEDC-1 t REV 1 t M4Y 2t 1984 REFERENCED'ORM4L
~ TEMPERATURES 4RE SHOWN AS
- 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE.
SDDF ¹ IEEE-07-145-S003 B THRU G 3 OPER4BILITY PERIOD
~ EXTENDED FROM 30 I s 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TIME DATA SHEET: DAYS TESTED VALUE TO 100 DAYS PLUS FILE NO.33-2-C12 MARGIN BY ANALYSIS~
DOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: ~ I 4. SWEC CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-029 TERMINAL HEAD GASKET MUST BE REPLACED ACCEPTABLE TO NUREG OS88,CAT II
~ I I WITH A NEW GASKET WHENEVER HEAD COVEP.
IINOTES: (CONT.) IS REMOVED~ IN ORDER TQ MAINTAIN I a6.COMBINED RADIATIQN FOR GAMMA, BETA AND QUALIFICATION. I s NEUTRON FOR 40 YEARS OF QUALIFIED LIFE 5.FACTORY CERTIFICATION TESTING OF RTD'Sl PLUS ACCIDENT INCLUDING APPLICABLE HAS DEMONSTRATED RCCURACY OF <~/-1.0 Fs MAINT/SURVEIL'EFEREtlCE: BETA REDUCTION AND NEUTRON CONVERSIOhl THE QUALIFICATION TYPE TESTING HAS 2 (NOTE 4) I ~ IS 4. 4E7 RADS. SHOWN AN ACCURACY QF +/-1.2 F.
~ ~ A REVIEW OF THE SETPOINT CALCULATIONS QUALIFIED LIFE HAS SHOWN THAT +/-1.2F IS AN ~ ~ ~ I (YEARS): 40 ~ ~ ~ ~ ACCEPTABLE ACCURRCY.
REFERENCE:
2,4 I ~ I I I
~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ I ~ ~
NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 QF 1 QUAL REF ¹ C041DCI REV 18-Mar-85 a a a s=-a=====a====== s s s s ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ~ s s s
~
s
~ ~ DOCUMENT R EFERENCE as s ll PARAMETER s SPECIFIED ~ QUALIFIED QUAL lMARGINs REMARKS s
s s EQUIP NO ~ . 2CMS+TE119 s
~
s s
~ ~
s s s s VALUE l VALUE a s SPECIFIED s QUALIFIED t s METHOD I DEMO aa- a '--a =-=-=-- ' a sSPEC NO.: C041D l s OP. TIME: l 100 DAYS s )100 DAYS AN+DATA s YES ~ NOTE lSYSTEM: CONTAINMENT ~ I TEMP (F): s s NOTE 1 MONITORING SYSTEM NORMAL 150/135 s 150 2,4 l TEST-SIM t NA a NOTE 2 s ABNORMAL a 190 190 2,4 s TEST-S IM ~ NA s TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) ACCIDENT s 340 400 2 s TEST-S IM a YES l RESISTANCE TEMPERATURE ~ s PRESS (PSIG) s s s s s NOTE 1 DETECTOR (RTD) ll NORMAL .5 TO 1.0 ATMOS ~ TEST SIM l
'NANA s
ABNOPMAL s 2 2 AN+DATA lMANUFACTURER: PYCO ACCIDENT 45 63 l TEST-SIM l YES s
~ s RH (/>: I s s s
NOTE 1 sMODEL NO.: 122-4030-04-2.7-82.3 ~ s NORMAL ~ 90 100 1 s TEST-S I l'I l NA s s ABNORMAL 100 100 s 1 s TEST-S I M l NA l SAFETY FUNCTION: ACCIDENT STEAM STEAM 1 s TEST-S IM s NA s MONITOR DRYWELL AREA I s RADIATION: s s s s s s NOTE TEMPERATURE sl NORM GAMMA s s s s s s ll ACC GAMMA 5. 1E7 2. 2E8 ~ TEST 8 IM s YES, s NOTE 6 I OP. CODE: A ls NORM BETA s s s s sl ACC BETA s s s s s s s
~ s NEUTRON s llSPRAY YES YES 1 s TEST-S IM I NA s lACCURACY ltSUBMERGENCE NA NA NA ~ NA s s
SPEC: +/-1. 2F (NOTE 5) ~ ~ DEMO: +/-1. 2F ~
~
s
~ ~ s ~ ~
aZONE NO.: PC261638 ~ ~ sSUBMERGENCE: NA DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1. FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONt".ENTAL CONDITIONS, s sSPRAY: YES l s 1 EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESI GN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. s s s a CRITERIA, EGEDC-1, REV 1, MAY 2, 1984. 2- NORMAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS s
- 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE.
s SDDF ¹ IEEE-07-145-5003 8 THRU G 3 OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FRQt4 30 a ~ 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TIME DATA SHEET: DAYS TESTED VALUE TQ 100 DAYS PLUS s a a F ILF NQ. 33-2-C12 MARGIN BY ANALYSIS. lDOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: 4. SWEC CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-029 TERMINAL HEAD GASKET MUST BE REPLACED sACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT I ~
~ ~ ~ WITH A NEW GASKET WHENEVER HEAD COVER s s
l lNOTES: (CONT ~ ) IS REMOVED, IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN s s I l6.COMBINED RADIA'TIQN FOR GAMMA, BETA AND QUALIFICATION. s NEUTRON FOR 40 YEARS OF QUALIFIED LIFE 5. FACTORY CERTIFICATION TESTING OF RTD'Sl s s PLUS ACCIDENT INCLUDING APPLICABLE HAS DEMONSTRATED ACCURACY OF (+/-1.0 Fl s MAI NT/SURVE ILL BETA REDUCTION AND NEUTRON CONVERSION THE QUALIFICATION TYPE TESTING HAS
REFERENCE:
2 (NOTE 4> l I IS 5. 1E7 RADS. SHOWN AN ACCURACY OF +/-1.2 F. s s s s
~ A REVIEW QF THE SETPOINT CALCULATIONS lQUALIFIED LIFE s ~
s s HAS SHOWN THAT +/-1 ~ 2F IS AN
'(YEARS): 40 s ~ ~ ~ ACCEPTABLE ACCURACY.
s
REFERENCE:
2,4 s s
~ ~
s
~
s ~ s s s s
~ ~
s ~
~ ~ ~ ~
NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF QUAL REF N C041DCJ REV 18-Mar-85 ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION I I
~
DOCUMENT REFERENCE s 1 1 PARAMETER I SPECIFIED 1 QUALIFIED I QUAL ~ MARGINl REMARKS
~ ~
s VALUE t VALUE I SPECIFIED 1 QUALIFIED s METHOD s DEMO I I I EQUIP NO.: 2CMS+TE 120 I
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
I
~ ~ ~
I
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
I SPEC NO.: C041D l OP. 1 TIME: l 100 DAYS l >100 DAYS l 3 l YES I NOTE 3 ISYSTEM: CONTAINMENT 'TEI'1P (F> NOTE 1 I MONITORING SYSTEM ITYPE: (DESCRIPTION) a s RESISTANCE TEMPERATURE
PRESS(PSIG)'N+DATA ls I I NORMAL ABNORMALI ACCIDENT 1
a 150/135 190 340 a s I 150 190 400 s 1 s 1 1 I s 2.4 2,4
~
I TEST-SIM TEST-S IM TEST-S I M I I 1
~
NA NA YES l I I NOTE 2 DETECTOR (RTD) Is NORMAL 1 5 TO 1.0 s ATMOS I 1 s TEST-SIM 1 NA I sa ABNORMAL! 2 ~ 2 I 1 I AN+DATA ~ NA !MANUFACTURER: PYCO s 1 ACCIDENT 1 45 63 1 TEST-SIM 1 YES I t /5 I I I ~ ~ I NOTE 1 lMODEL NO.: 122-4030-04-2.7-82.3 NORt'1AL ~ 90 s 1 00 1 ~ 2 s TEST-S IM I NA as ABNORMALI 100 s 100 s 1 s 2 TEST-5 IM ~ NA I SAFETY FUNCTION: ACCIDENTS STEAM 1 STEAM s 1 ~ 2 1 TEST-SIM a NA MONITOR DRYWELL AREA 'RADIATION ~ I ~ I~ NOTE I I I TEMPERATURE 1>> NORM GAMMAl I I I I 1 1 ACC GAI'1MA 1 3.8F7 1 2.2EG s 4 I TEST-S I M s YES NOTE 6 I s OP. CODE: A ts NORM BETA I I I ACC BETA I I I I I ~ I NEUTRON ~ I I I s ~ SPRAY l YES s YES t 1 s TEST SIM s NA tACCURACY 1 I SUBMERGENCE 1 NA a NA 1 NA 1 NA a NA s NA SPEC: +/-1. 2F (NOTE S) ~
~ ~
I DEMO: +/-1. 2F ~
~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~
aZONE NO.: PC250625 I I I ~
~ SUBMERGENCE: NA DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1.FOR COMPLETF ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS,l ISPRAY: YES le 1. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFEREh!CED. I CRITERIA, EQEDC-1, REV 1, htAY 2, 1984. 2.NORMAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS
- 2. VENDOR ENVIROt'lMENTAL QL'ALIFICATION REPORT, MAX DESIGl'l/AVERAGE-I SDDF tt IEEE-07-145-5003 B THRU G 3.OPERABILITY PEPIOD EXTENDED FROM 30 I 1 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TIME DATA SHEET- DAYS TESTED VALUE TO 100 DAYS PLUS I
FILE NQ. 33-2-C12 MARGIN BY ANALYSIS.- I DOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: 1 s 4 SWEC CALCULATION NQ. 12177-EQS-029
~ 4.TERMINAL HEAD GASKET MUST BE REPLACED lACCEPTABLE TQ NUREG 0588,CAT II~ ~
I WITH A NEW GASKET WHENEVER HEAD COVEP. I IINOTES: (CONT.> IS REMOVED. IN ORDER TO t'1AINTAIN I I 1 l6.COMBINED RADIATION FOR GAMMA, BETA AND. QUALIFICATION. I 1 1 NEUTRON FOR 40 YEARS OF QUALIFIED LIFE S.FACTORY CERTIFICATIQh! TEST NG OF RTD Sl I I PLUS ACCIDENT INCLUDING APPLICABLE HAS DEMOhlSTRATED ACCURACY OF (+/-1.0 Fl l MAINT/SURVE ILL BETA REDUCTION AND h!EUTRON CQNVERSION THE QUALIFICATION TYPE TESTING HAS I
REFERENCE:
2 (NOTE 4) IS 3.8E7 RADS. SHOWhl AN ACCURACY OF ~/-1.2 F.
~ ~ ~ ~ A REVIEW OF THE SETPOINT CALCULATIONS lQUALIFIED LIFE I I I I HAS SHOWN THAT +/-1. 2F IS AN I I (YEARS): 40 ~ ~ ACCEPTABLE ACCURACY.
REFERENCE:
2,4 ~
~ ~ ~ ~
I
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ I
NINF MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50 410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF l) C041DCK REV 18"Mar-85 aaaa aaa I I I ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EGUIPMENT DESCRIPTION I I DOCUMENT REF ERENCE saaaaaa aaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa' I PARAMETER s SPECIFIED ~ QUALIFIED I QUAL a MARGIN s REMARKS I VALUE VALUE SPEC IF IED GUALIFIE D I METHOD l DEMO I s EGUIP NO.: 2CMSiaTE121 I I
~ ~
s I
~
a ~
-- .aas I a a a<aa I aaa ISPEC NO.: C041D s QP. TIME: I 100 DAYS )100 DAYS l AN+DATA l YES I NOTE 3 lSYSTEM: CONTAINMENT I TEMP (F): I NOTE 1 MONITORING SYSTEM a NORMAL ~ 150/135 150 1 I
2,4 a TEST-SIM l NA I NOTE 2 I I s ABNORMALI 190 190 2,4 s TEST-S I M l NA s TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) ACCIDENT l 340 400 1 I 2 I TEST-SIM a YES RESISTANCE TEMPERATURE a PRESS (PS I G) s I I NOTE 1 DETECTOR (RTD) l NORMAL ~ .S TO 1.0 ATMOS 1 l TEST-S I M s NA a I I a ABNORMALI 2 1 2.4 AN+DATA l NA a IMANUFACTURER: PYCO I ACCIDENT l 4S 63 1 2 TEST-SIM l YES I RH (/) ~ I ~ NOTE 1
'22 a
I MODEL NO ~ 4030 04 2 7 82 3 l
~ ~ l NORMAL I 90 100 1 2 I TEST-SIM s NA l ABNQRMALl 100 100 I 2 s TEST-S IM I NA l lSAFETY FUNCTION: I ACCIDENTs STEAM STEAM 2 l TEST-S IM s NA I
MONITOR DRYWELL ARE4 I RADIATION: I NOTE
~ ~
I I 1 I TFMPERATURE I NORM GAMMAI I I I s ACC GAMMA s 4.5E7 2.2E8 I TEST-SIM l YES l NOTE 6 I s OP. CODE: A l NORM BETA I I ACC BETA I I I
~ NEUTRON ~ I lSPRAY YES 1 TEST-S IM a NA IACCURACY sSUBMERGENCEI NA NA I NA ~ NA I SPEC: +/-1. 2F (NOTE 5> I DEMO: +/-1. 2F I
I lZONE NO.: PC240603 I I I ISUBMERGENCE: YES DOCUMENT REFEREI'lCE: N QTES: l. FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMEI'lTAL CONDITIONS, l
~ SPRAY: YES l 1. EGUIPi lENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN BEE THE DOCUl'1ENT REFERENCED.
CRITERIA, EQEDC-1, REV 1, MAY 2, 1984. NORMAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS s I 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, MAX DES I GN/AVFRAGE. I I SDDF l) IEEE-07-145-5003 B THRU G 3. OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FROM 30 I EGUIPI'1ENT OPERABILITY TIME DATA SHEET: DAYS TESTED VALUE TQ 100 DAYS PLUS FILF NQ.33-2-C12 MARGIN BY ANALYSIS. IDOCUl'1ENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: I 4. SWEC CALCULATION NO. 12177-FGS-029 TERMIN4L HEAD GASKET MUST BE REPLACED IACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588;CAT Is I WITH A NEl'l GASKET WHENEVER HEAD COVER I
~ NOTEB: (CONT.) IS REMOVED, IN ORDER TQ MAINTAIN l 6.COMBINED RADIATION FOR GAMMAi BETA AND QUAL IF ICATIQN.
I NEUTRON FOR 40 YEARS QF GUALIFIED LIFE FACTORY CERTIFIC4TION TESTING OF RTD'Sl PLUS ACCIDENT INCLUDING APPLICABLE HAS DEMONSTRATED ACCURACY OF <+/-I.O Fs s MAINT/SURVEILL BETA REDUCTION AND NEUTRON CONVERSION THE QUALIFICATION TYPE TESTING H4S
REFERENCE:
2 (NOTE 4> s IS 4.5E7 RADS. SHQWN AN ACCURACY OF +/-1 ~ 2 F. I I 4 REVIEW OF THE SETPOINT CALCULATIONS l lQUALIFIED LIFE I I HAS SHOWN THAT +/-1.2F IS AN I I (YEARS): 40 ACCEPTABLE ACCURACY.
REFERENCE:
2,4 I ~
~ I
NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF QUAL REF ¹ C041DCL REV 16-Mar-85
-a--------aa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, ~ ~ ~ ~ ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ~
s
~ ~
DOCUMENT REFERENCE sQUAL s PARAMETER s SPECIFIED s QUALIFIED l sMARGIN REMARKS l VALUE s VALUE SPECIFIED l QUALIFIED METHOD e DEMO s ~ lEQUIP NO.: 2CMS+TE122 s s s s s
~ ~ s s sSPEC NO.: C041D s s sOP.TIME:. s 100 DAYS s )100 DAYS AN+DATA s YES NOTE CSYSTEM: CONTAINMENT sTEMP (F): ~
s
~ s s s
s s l NOTE s s MONITORING SYSTEM s s NORMAL l 104/93 s 150 2 s TEST-SI M e NA s NOTE ABNORMAL s 106 190 2,4 s TEST-S I M l NA s TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) s s ACCIDENT s 200 s 400 s TEST-SIM s YES RESISTANCE TEMPERATURE s s PRESS (PS I G) ~ s
~
s NOTE 1 DETECTOR (RTD) NORMAL l-0.25"WG ~ ATMOS ~ TEST-S I M s NA s s ~ ABNORMALs-0.25"WG ATMOS 2 s TEST-S I M s NA IMANUFACTURER: PYCO ACCIDENT 2.8 ~ 63 2 ~ TEST-SI M s YES sRH (%): ~ ~ s NOTE 1 IMODEL NO.: 122-4030-04-2.7-82.3l s NORMAL ~ 50 s 100 2 s TEST-S I M s NA s s ABNORMAL s 50 s 100 2 s TEST-S I M NA s SAFETY FUNCTION: l ACCIDENT s 100 s STEAM 2 TEST-8IM s NA s MONITORING SUPP. CHAMBER AREA l RADIATION: s s s NOTE 1 TEMPERATURE NORM GAMMAe 2E6 1 NA s s s ACC GAMMA s 3.2E7 s 2. 2E8 1 TfST-SIM s YES l OP. CODE: <<B NORM BETA ~ NA s 1 s NA s s l ACC BETA 1. 3E7 1 s YES NEUTRON l NA s 1 s NA sSPRAY s NA YES NA TEST-SIM s NA sACCURACY sSUBMERGENCE s NA NA NA NA s NA SPEC: +/-1 ~ 2F NOTE 5 ABNORMAL DEMO: +/-1 ~ 2F s l ZONE NO.: SC215122 s
- i. FOR s
sSUBMERGENCE: DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, s sSPRAY: s 1 ~ EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. s s s CRITERIA, EQEDC-1, REV 1, MAY 2, 1984 ~ 2 TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS lEQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE sSUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY SDDF ¹ IEEE-07-145-5003 B THRU G 3. OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FROM 30 s s s 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TIME DATA SHEET: DAYS TESTED VALUE TO 100 DAYS PLUS s s FILE NO. 33-2-C13 MARGIN BY ANALYSIS. l DOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: 4. SWEC CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-029 4 ~ TERMINAL HEAD GASKET MUST BE REPLACED lACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT Ill WITH A NEW GASKET WHENEVER HEAD COVER IS REMOVED, IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN QUALIFICATION. 5.FACTORY CERTIFICATION TESTING OF RTD'Ss s HAS DEMONSTRATED ACCURACY OF (~/-1.0 Fs l MAINT/SURVEILL- THE QUALIFICATION TYPE TESTING HAS
REFERENCE:
2 (NOTE 4) SHOWN AN ACCURACY OF +/-1.2 F. A REVIEW OF THE SETPOINT CALCULATIONS s s QUALIFIED LIFE HAS SHOWN THAT +/-1. 2F IS AN (YEARS): 40 ACCEPTABLE ACCURACY.
REFERENCE:
2,4 s s s s
~ ~ ~ s ~ s ~ s ~ ~
s s
NINE NILt POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUNBER 50-410 SYSTEN COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF II C041DCM REV 0 16-Nar-85
~
s
~ ~ ENVIRONNENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPNENT DESCRIPTION s ~ ~
s DOCUNENT REFERENCE I s ~ s s s I PARANETER s SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED I QUAL ~ MARGIN ~ RENARKS
~ s ~ VALUE I VALUE s SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED I NETHOD ~ DEMO ~
s EQUIP NO.: 2CNS+TE123 e SPEC NO.: C041D s eOP. TINE: e 100 DAYS e )100 DAYS I 3 AN+DATA I YES e NOTE 3 sSYSTEN: CONTAINNENT 'TEMP (F) s s s s ~ ~ NOTE 1 MONITORING SYSTEM s ~ NORMAL ~ 1 50/ 135 ~ 1 50 s 1 2 I TEST-S I M ~ NA s NOTE 2 s s ABNORNALI 190 I 190 s 1 2,4 TEST-S I M ~ NA I TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) ACCIDENTs 270 e 400 I 1 s TEST-S IM ~ YES RESISTANCE TEMPERATURE s s PRESS (PS IG) ~ s I s s s s
~
s
~
NOTE 1 DETECTOR (RTD) NORNAL s AS TO 1.0 e ATNOS I 1 2 s TEST-SIN e NA s s ~ ABNORNALa 2 s 2 s 1 4N+DATA ~ NA IMANUFACTURER PYCO s s ACCIDENTS 40 ~ 63 ~ 1 2 s TEST-SIN I YES s sRH (%): a ~ s a s
~ ~
NOTE 1 aMODEL NO.: 122-7039-314 II NORNAL s 90 I 100 e 1 TEST-S I M e NA a s ABNORNALa 100 s 100 s 1 s TEST-S IM s NA eSAFETY FUNCTION: ACCIDENTS 100 STEAM 1 TEST-SIN NA s ~ ~ ~ ~ MONITOR SUPPRESSION POOL e s RADIATION: e s s s s ~ s NOTE 1 WATER TENPER4TURE ss NORM GANNAs s I'CC GAMN4 s s s ~ S ~ SE7 2.2E8 s 4 s TEST S IN ~ YES s NOTE 6 IOP. CODE: A ss NORM BETA I'CC BETA s s s s s s s ~ s s s s II NEUTRON s a s s ssSPRAY YES I YES s 1 s TEST-S IN I NA sACCURACY ~ SUBNERGENCE ~ <2 SEC ~ 10 SEC ~ 1 AN + DATA I NA SPEC: +/-1 ~ 2F (NOTE S ~
~ ~ ~
DEMO: +/-1 ~ 2F s s s s s ~ ~ s ~ s I ZONE NO.: PC215121 ~ s s s sSUBNERGENCE: YES DOCUNENT
REFERENCE:
NOT ES: 1 ~ FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONNENTAL CONDITIONS~ ~ ISPRAY: YES e s l. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIG N SEE THE DOCUNENT REFERENCED. s s CRITERIA, EQEDC-1, REV 1, NAY 2, 1984. 2 a NORMAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS s DENOTES:
- 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFIC4TION REPORT, NAX DESIGN/AVERAGE.
s s SDDF (I IEEE-07-145-5003 B THRU G OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FROM 30 s s s ~ 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TINE DATA SHEET: DAYS TESTED VALUE TO 100 DAYS PLUS s FILE NO. 33-2-C13 NARGIN BY ANALYSIS. s DOCUNENTATION ACCEPTABILfTY: 4 ~ SWEC C4LCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-029 TERNINAL HEAD GASKET MUST BE REPLACED ~ ACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0S88,CAT ~ ~ WITH A NEW GASKET WHENEVER HEAD COVER s s s (CONT.) IS RENOVED, IN ORDER TO N4INTAIN s s sa6.CONBINED RADIATION FOR GANNA, BETA AND QUALIFICATION. s s NEUTRON FOR 40 YEARS OF QUALIFIED LIFE S.FACTORY CERTIFICATION TESTING OF RTD'Ss s s s s PLUS ACCIDENT INCLUDING APPLICABLE HAS DEMONSTRATED ACCURACY OF <+/-1 ~ 0 Fs s NAINT/SURVEILL BETA REDUCTION AND NEUTRON CONVERSION THE QUALIFICATION TYPE TESTING HAS
REFERENCE:
2 (NOTE 4) IS 5. SE7 RADS. SHOWN AN ACCURACY OF +/-1.2 F.
~
s s
~ A REVIEW OF THE SETPOINT CALCULATIONS IQUALIFIED LIFE ~ ~
s s HAS SHOWN THAT +/-1.2F IS AN (YEARS): 40 s s
~ ~ ACCEPTABLE ACCURACY.
I
REFERENCE:
2,4 ~ s
~ ~
s
~ ~ s ~ s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
NINE NILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM CONPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF ¹ C041DCN REV ib-Nar-85 e e ENVIRONNENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFIC4TION EQUIPNENT DESCRIPTION e e
~ DOCUNENT REFERENCE e PARAMETER s SPECIFIED s QUALIFIED s QUAL sNARGINs REMARKS SPECIFIED QURLIFIED NETHOD DENO ----------~~- -- -- --s=-
V4LUE VALUE I e e s ~ EQUIP NO.: 2CNS+TE124 ~
~
e s
~
e s s s ---=== -=====
~ ~ ====--
sSPEC NO.: C041D lOP. TINEz s 100 DAYS s )100 DAYS l 3 s ~ AN+DATA s YES s NOTE 3 lSYSTEN: CONTR INNENT l TEMP (F): e NOTE 1 e MONITORING SYSTEM NORNAL s 150/135 s 1S0 s 1 ~ 2~4 s TEST-SIN e NA s NOTE 2 ABNORMALI 190 I 190 l 1 l 2,4 s TESTS IN s NA I TYPE (DESCRIPTION) 4CCIDENTl 270 l 400 s 1 l 2 s TEST-8 I M e YES ~ RESISTANCE TEMPERATURE s
'PRESS(PSIG) -s NOTE 1 DETECTOR (RTD) I 'ORNAL .5 TO 1 ~ 0 e ATNOS l 1 s 2 TEST-SIN s NA s I ABNORN4L ~ 2 ~ 1 s 2,4 AN+DAT4 I NA eMANUFACTURER: PYCO I ACCIDENTs 40 l 63 s 1 s 2 s TEST-SIN s YES e
e (VS s e s e
~ e e NOTE 1 sMODEL NO.: 122-4030-04-2.7-82.3l e NORNAL s 90 s 100 e 1 l 2 ~ TEST S IM ~ NA s e s ABNORNALs 100 l 100 l 1 e 2 s TEST-S IN ~ NA s lSAFETY FUNCTION: ACCIDENTe 100 s STEAM l 1 s 2 TEST SIM ~ NA s
~ NONITORING SUPP. CHANBER ARE4 'ADIATION NOTE 1 e TEMPERATURE s NORM GANN4s e e e e ~ ACC GANNA I 5.5E7 2 ~ 2E8 s TEST SIN s YES s NOTE 6 s OP. CODE: A NORN BETA e e e e e e ~ ACC BETA I I e e e e e e e s NEUTRON I e e e lSPRAY l YES l YES l 1 l 2 s TEST-SIN s NA sACCURACY eSUBMERGENCEI <2 SEC s 10 SEC ~ 1 s 2,4 AN ~ DATA I NA e SPEC: +/-1. 2F (NOTE 5) e e s DEMO: +/-1 ~ 2F e e e e s ZONE NO.: PC215121 sSUBMERGENCE: YES s DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1 ~ FOR CONPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, s
~
e e e SPRAY: YES e e 1 2.
~ EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONNENTAL DESIGN CRITERIA, EQEDC-1, REV 1, NAY 2, 1984 VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, '.NORNAL SEE THE DOCUNENT REFERENCED.
TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS NAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. SDDF ¹ IEEE-07-145-S003 B THRU G 3.OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FROM 30 e a 3. EQUIPNENT OPERABILITY TIME DATA SHEET: DAYS TESTED V4LUE TO 100 DAYS PLUS e FILE N0.33-2-C13 MARGIN BY ANALYSIS.
~ DOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: s 4 ~ SWEC CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-029 4.TERNINAL HEAD G4SKET NUST BE REPLACED lACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT Is WITH A NEW GASKET WHENEVER HE4D COVER e sNOTES: (CONT.) IS REMOVED, IN ORDER TO NAINTAIN eb.CONBINED RADIATION FOR GANNA, BETA AND QUALIFICATION.
NEUTRON FOR 40 YEARS OF QUALIFIED LIFE 5. FACTORY CERTIFICATION TESTING OF RTD 'S s PLUS RCCIDENT INCLUDING APPLICABLE HAS DENONSTRATED ACCURACY OF <~/-1.0 Fs ILL I MAINT/SURVE
REFERENCE:
2 (NOTE 4) BETA REDUCTION AND NEUTRON CONVERSION IS 5 ~ SE7 RADS. ~ THE QUALIFICATION TYPE TESTING HAS SHOWN RN ACCURACY OF ~/-1.2 A REVIEW OF THE SETPOINT CALCULATIONS F. s QUALIFIED LIFE HAS SHOWN THAT +/-1.2F IS AN (YEARS): 40 ACCEPTABLE 4CCURACY.
REFERENCE:
2,4 e
0 NINE MIL OINT - UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF ¹ C041DCO REV 16-Mar-85 I I I I ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION I ~ EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION I I DOCUMENT REFERENCE saaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ss PARAMETER a SPECIFIED s QUALIFIED I s QUAL s MARGIN s REMARKS I ~ I ~ VALUE I VALUE s SPECIFIED l QUALIFIED I METHOD I DEMO I I I IEQUIP NO.: 2SFC+TEGA I I
~ ~ ~
I I I SPEC NO.: C041D s ~ OP TIME I >100 DAYS s AN+DATA ~ YES ~ NOTE 3 TEMP (F): I I tSYSTEM: SPENT FUEL POOL ~ ~ I
~
I ~ ~ NOTE 1 COOLING AND s ~ NORMAL l 104/93 s 150 e 2,4 s TEST-S I M I NA ~ NOTE 2 CLEAN-UP et ABNORMALe 106 e 190 ~ 2,4 ~ TEST-SI M s NA s ~ TYPE (DESCRIPTION) le ACCIDENTl 200 l 400 e e TEST-S IM ~ YES I PRESS (PS IG) NOTE
~
RESISTANCE TEMPERATURE I ~
~
I I 1 DETECTOR (RTD) t I NORMAL s -0.25"WG ATMOS s I TEST-S I M s NA s I I ABNORMALI-0.25"WG I ATMOS I s TEST-8 IM a NA I IMANUFACTURER: PYCO ~ I ACCIDENT ~ 2.8 I 63 I TEST-SIM s YES
~ IRH (/): ~ ~
I NOTE 1 sMODEL NO.: 122-4030-04-2.7-9 Is NORMAL I 50 100 s TEST-S I M s NA ~ I I IRRADIATION: sssABNORMALs 50 100 TEST-S IM I NA ISAFETY FUNCTION: s I ACCIDENT I 100 STEAM s TEST-S I M ~ NA I I I IMONITORING SF POOL HT EXCH s ~ I NOTE 1 I OUT TEMPERATURE ss NORM GAMMAs 2Eb 1 I I NA s I I as ACC GAMMA s 3.2E7 2. 2E8 1 TEST-SIN YES s I I OP. CODE: A ~ s NORM BETA I NA 1 I NA s I YES I ts ACC BETA I 1 ~ 3E7 1 I ll NEUTRON NA 1 TEST-S I M I NA ~ IISPRAY NA YES NA s ~ NA s tACCURACY seSUBMERGENCEI NA NA NA I NA ~ NA ~ SPEC: +/-1. 2F (NOTE 5) DEMO: +/-1. 2F I I
~
I ~
~ ~
I ZONE NO.: SC215122 ~ ~ ~ SUBMERGENCE: DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1 ~ FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, I ~ SPRAY: ~ l 1. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. CRITERIA, EQEDC-1, REV 1, MAY 2, 1984. 2.NORMAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS lEQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO e l 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. IISUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY sl SDDF ¹ IEEE-07-145-5003 B THRU G 3.OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FROM 30 I I ~ s 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TIME DATA SHEET: DAYS TESTED VALUE TO 100 DAYS PLUS s I FILE N0.34-2-C3 MARGIN BY ANALYSIS. ~ DOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: 4 ~ SWEC CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-029 4.TERMINAL HEAD GASKET MUST BE REPLACED I I lACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT ~ ~ WITH A NEW GASKET WHENEVER HEAD COVER
~ ~ ~
I IS REMOVED, IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN I I
~ ~
I I QUALIFICATION ~
~ ~ ~
I S.FACTORY CERTIFICATION TESTING OF RTD'Ss I ~
~
I I HAS DEMONSTRATED ACCURACY OF (+/-1 ' Fe l MAINT/SURVE ILL ~
~ ~ ~ THE QUALIFICATION TYPE TESTING HAS
REFERENCE:
2 (NOTE 4) ~
~ ~
I SHOWN AN ACCURACY OF +/-1.2 F. I I ~ I ~
~ A REVIEW OF THE SETPOINT CALCULATIONS s QUALIFIED LIFE I ~
I ~ HAS SHOWN THAT ~/-1.2F IS AN I ~ ACCEPTABLE ACCURACY' (YEARS): 40 I ~
REFERENCE:
2,4 I ~ I I
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
I ~ I I
~ ~
I ~
NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF ¹ C041DCP REV 0 16-Mar-85 c Rac I xzccRR
~ ~ ~
I ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ~
~ ~
I DOCUMENT REFERENCE I PARRMETER I SPECIFIED s QUALIFIED s s QUAL ~ MARGIN ~ REMARKS VALUE l VALUE I SPECIFIED ~ QUALIFIED l METHOD I DEMO ~
~ gyves I s EQUIP NO.: 2SFC+TE8B ~ ~ ~
I ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
I ~
~ ~ ~ ~
TIME 100 DAYS I >100 DAYS 3 2 AN+DATA YES t NOTE SPEC NO.: C041D OP I
-I - ~
s ISYSTEM: SPENT FUEL POOL s s
'TEMP (F) ~
s
~ ' I NOTE 1 COOLING AND NORMAL I 104/93 l 150 s 1 I 2,4 TEST-SIM s NA I NOTE 2 CLEAN-UP ABNORMALs 106 ~ 190 ~ 1 s 2,4 TEST-SIM s NA I a TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) s s ACCIDENT s 200 s 400 s 1 s 2 TEST-SIM I YES I I I RESISTRNCE TEMPERATURE 'PRESS(PSIG) ' ~ ~ I I I NOTE 1 DETECTOR (RTD) NORMAL s-0.25"WG s ATMOS s 1 TEST S IM I NA 4BNQRMALI-0.25"WG l ATMOS s 1 I 2 s TEST-8 I M I NA s eMANUFACTURER: PYCO s s RCCIDENT s 2. 8 s 63 I 1 2 ~ TEST SIM YES s I ~
I
~
I I I NOTE 1 s MODEL NO.: 122-4030-04-2. 7-9 ~ I NORMAL I 50 s 100 e l. I 2 I TEST-SIM s NA s ABNORMALI 50 t 100 ~ 1 a 2 I TEST-SIM I NA I s SAFETY FUNCTION: ACCIDENTl 100 I STEAM l . 1 s 2 TEST-SIM s NA I I ~ MONITORING SF POOL HT EXCH 'RADIATION NOTE 1 OUT TEMPERATURE ls NORM G4MM4I 2E6 I NA I I ss RCC GAMMA l 3.2E7 s 2.2EG e 1 s 2 I TEST-S IM I YES I s OP. CODE: A NORM BETA ~ NA s ~ 1 s NA I
~ ~ ACC BETA ~ 1 3E7 ~ I 1 I YES I I ss NEUTRON ~ N4 1 s NA I I ssSPRAY I NA I YES e NA 2 TEST-SIM s NA ~ ACCURACY esSUBMERGENCEt NA s NA ~ NA ~ NA I NA I NA ~
SPEC: +/-1 ~ 2F (NOTE 5) ~
~ ~ ~
MC!s as DEMO: +/-1 ~ 2F
~
I
~ ~ ~ ~
I I
~ I ~ 20NE NO.: SC215122 ~ ~
ISUBMERGENCE: ls DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1.FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS,I INOPERABILITY lSPRAY: ~ ~ 1 ~ EQUIPMENT QUALIFIC4TION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. I I CRITERIA, EQEDC-1, REV 1, MAY 2, 1984. 2.NORMAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS IEQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO I l 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE.
<<SUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY .SDDF ¹ IEEE-07-145-5003 B THRU G 3 PERIOD EXTENDED FROM 30 I I s 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TIME DATA SHEET: DAYS TESTED VALUE TO 100 DAYS PLUS FILE N0.34-2-C3 M4RG IN BY ANALYSIS.
s DOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: 4 ~ SWEC CALCULATION NQ. 12177-EQS-029 4.TERMIN4L HEAD GASKET MUST BE REPLACED IACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT I ~
~ ~
I WITH A NEW GASI(ET WHENEVER HEAD COVER IS REMOVED, IN ORDER TO M4INTAIN I QUALIFICATION.
- 5. FRCTORY CERTIFICATION TESTING OF RTD S e I
I ~ HAS DEMONSTRATED RCCURRCY OF (+/-1.0 Fl
~ ~
I MAINT/SURVEILL
~ ~
I THE QUALIFICATION TYPE TESTING HAS
+/-1.2 ~
REFERENCE:
2 (NOTE 4) ~ I I
~
SHOWN AN ACCURACY OF F. I
~ ~
A REVIEW OF THE SETPOINT CALCULATIONS QUALIFIED LIFE
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
I HAS SHOWN THAT +/-1.2F IS AN (YEARS): 40 I
~ ~ ~ ACCEPTABLE ACCURACY.
REFERENCE:
2,4 I ~ I I
~ I I I ~ ~
I ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ I
NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM CONPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF ¹ C041DCQ REV 16-Mar-85 a Qa
~ ~ ~ ~ ENVIRONNENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ~ ~ ~ ~
s ~ a sl DOCUNENT R EFERENCE s a I PARANETER e SPECIFIED s QUALIFIED a QUAL I NARG IN l REMARKS VALUE e VALUE s SPECIFIED QUALIFIED l NETHOD I DENO s s EQUIP NO. K 2SFCssTE314 ~
~ ~ ~
s a
~ s a ~ s ~ ~
s
~
s ISPEC NO. C041D OP TIME I 100 DAYS >100 DAYS 3 2 AN+DATA YES NOTE 3
-I K e ~ s ~ s s e eSYSTEMK SPENT FUEL POOL 'TENP (F) s NOTE 1 COOLING AND ls NORMAL I 104/98 e 150 s 1 2 s TEST-SIM a NA s NOTE 2 CLEAN-UP ABNORNALs 197 s 197 ~ 1 I TEST-S I M s NA a TYPEK (DESCRIPTION) ss ACCIDENTs 175 s 400 s 1 ~ TEST-SIN s YES RESIST4NCE TEMPERATURE ' PRESS (PS I G) s ~ ~ NOTE 1 s-0.25"WG TEST-S I M 's DETECTOR <RTD) NORMAL a ATMOS e 1 2 ~ a NA ~
s ABNORNALl-0.25"WG I ATNOS 1 2 TEST-S I M a NA e IMANUFACTURERK PYCO ~ e ACCIDENTS 2 8 ~ 63 ~ 1 2 ~ TEST-SI M s YES s s I'/ S s s s
~
a
~ ~
NOTE 1 s MODEL NO. K 122-4030-04-2.7-9 ~ I NORNAL e 50 s 100 ~ 1 TEST-S I M s NA
~ I ABNORNALt 50 t 100 l 1 2 s TEST-SIN s N4 e sSAFETY FUNCTION: s I ACCIDENT t 100 e STEAN l 1 2 e TEST-S IM l NA sNONITORING SF POOL SURGE TANK 'RADI4TION a s NOTE 1 OUTLET TEMPERATURE el NORM GANN41 2.2E6 1 s N4 e s
s ae ACC GAMNA s ~ 2.6E6 s 2.2E8 ~ 1 TEST-S I M s YES s sOP. CODE: A It NORN BETA s N4 ~ e 1 s N4 ~
~ s ACC BETA e 1.3E7 s 1 s YES I a
ee NEUTRON I NA a a 1 s N4 s llSPRAY ~ NA s YES e NA TEST-8 I M s NA eACCURACY eaSUBNERGENCEe N4 I NA e NA s NA ~ NA SPECK +/-1. 2F (NOTE 5) ~
~ ~ ~
DEMO: +/-1. 2F ~ s
~ ~ ~ ~
s ~ ~ a ZONE NO. K SC328193 s
~ ~ ~
sSUBNERGENCEK DOCUNENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1.FOR CONPLETE ENVIRONNENTAL CONDITIONS, a eSPRAY: 1. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONNENTAL DESIG N SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. s CRITERIA, EQEDC-1, REV 1, NAY 2, 1984 ~ 2.NORMAL TENPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS IEQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO 2 VENDOR ENVIRONNENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORTs NAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. sSUBNERGENCE OR SPR4Y SDDF ¹ IEEE-07-145-5003 B THRU G 3:OPER4BILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FROM 30 s e s 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TINE DAT4 SHEET: DAYS TESTED VALUE TO 100 DAYS PLUS FILE NO.34-2-C5 MARGIN BY ANALYSIS. a DOCUNENTATION ACCEPTABILITYK e s 4. SWEC CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-029 4 TERNINAL HEAD GASKET MUST BE REPLACED IACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT I ~
~ ~ ~ WITH A NEW GASKET WHENEVER HEAD COVER ~ ~ ~
s IS RENOVED, IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN
~ ~ ~ ~ QUALIFICATION.
s
~ ~ ~ ~ 5. FACTORY CERTIFICATION TESTING OF RTD 'S s ~
s
~ ~ HAS DENONSTRATED ACCURACY OF <+/-1.0 Fl I NA INT/SURVE ILL s ~ ~ ~ THE QUALIFICATION TYPE TESTING HAS
REFERENCE:
2 <NOTE 4) ~ s
~
s SI.<OWN AN ACCURACY OF +/-1 ~ 2 F.
~ ~
A REVIEW OF THE SETPOINT CALCULATIONS s QUALIFIED LIFE - - s
~ ~
s
~
a HAS SHOWN THAT ~/-1.2F IS AN (YEARS)K 40 a
~ ~ ~ ACCEPTABLE ACCUR4CY.
REFERENCE:
2,4 ~
~
s
~
s s s s
~ ~ ~ s ~ ~
a ~ s ~
~ ~
NINE NILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUNBER 50-410 SYSTEN COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF ¹ C041DCR REV 16-Nar-85 ENVIRONNENTAL CONDITIONS AND QU4LIFICATION EQUIPNENT DESCRIPTION s s DOCUNENT REFERENCE PARRNETER I SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED s QUAL ~ NARGINe RENARKS VALUE ~ VALUE ~ SPECIFIED e QU4LIFIED ~ NETHOD ~ DENO s
~
EQUIP NO.: 2SFC~TE31 B ~ ~ e e s ~ ~ s
-----s ~
s s SPEC NO.: eSYSTEM: C041D SPENT FUEL POOL COOLING AND
'TEMP(F)'-----'-----
I OP TINE? NORNAL
~
e 100 DAYS 120/109
~
s
>100 DAYS 150 s
I s 3 1
~
s 2 2, 4 s AN+DATA TEST-SIN
~
I YES NA s I NOTE 3 NOTE 1 NOTE 2 CLEAN-UP ABNORMALs 123 a 197 a 1 s 2,4 TEST-SIN s NA s t TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) ACCIDENT s 300 s 400 s 1 s 2 s TEST-SIM s YES RESISTANCE TENPER4TURE s PRESS (PS I 6) I NOTE 1 DETECTOR (RTD) s NORNAL I-0.25"WG I ATMOS I 1 s e TEST-SIN s NA I s s ABNORMALI-0 25"WG e ATNOS s 1 s 2 a TEST-SIN s NA s eNANUFACTURER: PYCO ACCIDENTs 2.8 s 63 s 1 s s TEST-SIN s YES s g/) s s ~ s
~ ~
s s NOTE 1 I NODEL NO.: 122-4030-04-2. 7-9 I NORMAL a 50 s 100 s 1 s 2 TEST-SIN t NA a ABNORMALI 50 I 100 s 1 e 2 ~ TEST-SIN I NA 2 TEST-SI M sSAFETY FUNCTION: sNONITORING SF POOL SURGE TANK s e ACCIDENTs
'4D IRT I ON 100 I STERM s 1 ~ ~
e t NA
-' NOTE 1 OUTLET TEMPERATURE e NORN GRMNAI 2.8E6 e s 1 s ~ NA s s
s s 4CC GAMMA e 1. 1E7 a 2.2EG e l. s TEST-S IN e YES ~ OP. CODE: A NORM BETA I NA ~ f e NA s s s ~ ACC BETR ~ 1.3E7 s 1 ~ YES e s s NEUTRON e NA s 1 e NA s s SPRAY NA ~ YES ~ NA 2 s TEST-SIN I NA e s s s sACCURACY s sSUBNERGENCE ~ NA s NA e NA e NA e N4 e NA ~ SPEC: +/-1. 2F (NOTE 5) I s s DEMO: +/-1. 2F s s s s e IZONE NO.: SC328221 s eSUBNERGENCE: t DOCUNENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1 ~ FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONNENTAL CONDITIONS, eSPRAY: 1 ~ EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONNENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUNENT REFERENCED. s CRITERIA, EQEDC-1, REV 1, NAY 2, 1984. 2.NORMAL TENPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS
~ EQUIPNENT NOT SUBJECT TO I 2. VENDOR ENVIRONNENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE.
sSUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY SDDF ¹ IEEE-07-145-5003 B THRU G 3 OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FROM 30
~
s 3. EQUIPNENT OPERABILITY TINE DATA SHEET: DAYS TESTED VALUE TO 100 DAYS PLUS e FILE NO.34-2-C5 MARGIN BY ANALYSIS. s DOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: 4. SWEC CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-029 4.TERMINAL HEAD GASKET MUST BE REPLACED eACCEPT4BLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT II WITH A NEW GASKET WHENEVER HEAD COVER s s IS REMOVED, IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN s QUALIFICATION. 5.FACTORY CERTIFICATION TESTING OF RTD Se HAS DENONSTRATED 4CCURACY OF (~/-f. 0 F s s I N4 INT/SURVE ILL THE QUALIFICATION TYPE TESTING HAS
REFERENCE:
2 (NOTE 4) SHOWN AN ACCURACY OF ~/-1.2 F. A REVIEW OF THE SETPOINT CALCULATIONS I QUALIFIED LIFE H4S SHOWN THAT +/-1.2F IS AN (YEARS): 40 ACCEPTABLE ACCURACY.
REFERENCE:
2,4 ~ s
~ s ~ ~ ~ s
NINE NILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM CONPQNENT EVALUATION NORK SHEET PAGE 1 QF 1 QUAL REF tt C051MAA REV 19-Mar-85 a'a a s a a A saaa aa a aa a
~ ~
a ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMFNT DESCRIPTION a
~ ~ ~
DOCUMENT REFERENCE I ~ aa aa a a a a a a I PARAMETER I SPECIFIED t QUALIFIED a QUAL s t4ARGIN s REMARKS
'UAL s ~
SPEC I F I ED I F I ED a I EQUIP NO.: 2CSL+FV114 a a a I s a VALUE
~ ~
a VALUE a -.--- I
~ ~ ~ ----------- ---= ---- s s
i METHOD I
'i DENO I ~ a aaa
~ SPE C NO C051l'I s sOP TINE s 100 DAYS a 100 DAYS i 3 s 2~4 AN + DATA I YES I NOTE 4
'TEI"P (F) I NOTE 1 ISYSTEN:
ILON PRESSURE CORE SPRAY NORMAL I 104/85 I 122 1 a I TEST SI,I s NA ~ NOTE 2 a a s i ABNORMAL ~ 9+ s 122 ~ 1 a 2 I TEST-S IM s NA s TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) ACCIDENTI 175 s 340 s 1 s 2,5 TEST-SIN a YEB a IMOTOR OPERATED VALVE~ 'PRESS(PSIG) ' NOTE 1 a a IRELIANCE AC MOTOR, CLASS RH ss NORMAL s
.25"laIG s 0 1 2 TEST-BIN I NA tINSULATION sl ABNORNALI .25"NG I 0 1 ~ 2 TEST-S IN I NA I s MANUFACTURER: LIMITORQUE s s ACCIDENTs 2.8 I 25 s 1 s 2 TEST-S IN I YES I 'RH (/)
a ~ s a a a a a a ~ NOTE INODEL NQ.: SMB-00-5 as NORMAL I 50 I 100 s 1 I 2 TEST-SIN s NA I a ls ABNORNALI 50 a 100 s 1 s s TEST-S IM si NA ISAFETY FUNCTION: sis ACCIDENTs 100 s STEAN s 1 s 2,5 TcST SIM . I NA I LPCS TEST BYPASS RADIATION s a a a NOTE 1 a sl NORM GANMAs 7.7E5 1 I TEST-BIN I NA si s ACC GANMA ~ 1. 1E8 s 1. 66EG a 1 s TEST-Site a YES NOTE 5 sOP. CODE: A ss NORM BETA I NA 1 s NA s II ACC BETA s 1.3E7 s 1 AN+DATA s YES
'A a
NA a a ss I ISPRAY NEUTRON sNA I s NA s NA NA 1 NA NA I NA NA NA NA s
~
NA s s (ACCURACY I I SUBMERGENCE ~ NA s ~ ~ s SPEC: NA a a aaaas ' 2' a DENO: NA ~
~
a a a ~ a a a IZONE NO.: SC175103 ~
~ ~
a ISUBt'IERGENCE: NA II DOCUNENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1.FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, I sSPRAY: NA 1. EQUIPHENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DQCUNENT REFERcNCED. a a CRITERIA, EQEDC-1, REV 1 i I'IAY 2, 1984. 2.iNORHAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOHtsl AS HAX IEQUIPMENT NOT SUBsIECT TO 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMiENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, DESIGN/AVERAGE. a-sSUBNERGENCE OR SPRAY I ~ SDDF tt RSTD DATED 3-9-79 FOR REPORT 80003 3.QUALIFIED LIFE IS BASED ON ZONE SPE-EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TIN" DATA SHEeT: CIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL VALUFS, IJHICH a a FILE NO. 27-5-C6 INCORPORATE MAXIMUM, MINIMUM AND s DOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY 4. CALCULATION NUMBER 12177-EOS-025 AVERAGE CONDITIONS. IACCEPTABLE TO NURFG 0588,CAT I sl 5. GE PHASF 3 TEST REPORT 4.OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FROM a t s SDDF tt IEEE Oib. 820-5007C 30 DAYS TESTED VALUE TO 100 DAYS BY ANALYSIS ~ I 5.RADIATION QUALIFICATION WAS EXTENDED a FROM 20 NEGARADB IN REF. 2 TO 166 s MAINT/SURVEILL- a a a a NEGARADB IN REF. 5 (GE PHASE 3 TEST
REFERENCE:
2 a
~
a a REPORT), WHICH HAS SUCCESSFULLY a s a COMPLETED TESTING UP TO 30 DAYS OF IGUALIFIED LIFE a POST-LOCA TESTING. (YEARS): 20 (SEE NOTE 3) Il REFERFNCE: 2,4 ~
~ ~ ~ ~
a
~ ~
a ~ a a
~ a ~ a a ~
a ~
NINE tlILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM CONPQNENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 2 23-Nar-85
--aa REV 0 "-aa QUAL REF It COSlNAB -a-aa -a-a-- aaaaa -- a a aaaaaa-aaaaaaaa -aaaaaaaaa a--aaa aa =-- aaa aaraa a =--- aaaaaa ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION I
EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ~ I ~ I ~ I I DOCUMENT REFERENCE I I I PARAMETER I SPECIFIED I QURLIF I ED I I QUAL INARGINt RFNARKS SPECIFIED QUALIFIED METHOD DENO t EQUIP NO.: 2ICSssAOV109 'taaaaaaaaaaa s
~
VALUE s VALUE aaa = aaaaa'aaaaaaaaaaa'a I a a aaaa'aaaaaraaaaa'a-aa s ~ ~ ~ aaaaa'aaaaaa'aa--aaaaa .=---== ~ tSPFC NO.: CO51N I I QP ~ TIHE, s 12 HRS I )100 DAYS ~ 3 4 s AN+DATA I YES I NOTE 3 ssSYSTENt REACTOR CORE I sTENP (F)' I s s I s s NOTE ISOLATION II NORNAL ~ 104/8S s 194 ~ 1 s 2 I TEST SIN ~ NA s NOTE 2 sl ABNORMAL) 86 I 194 I 1 I 2 s TEST SIM ~ NA I TYPF: (DESCRIPTION) ACCIDENTI 325 I 380 I 1 I 2 I TEST-SIN I YES LIMIT SWITCH s I PRESS (PSIG) I I I I ~ ~ I NOTE 1 I I I I NORMAL I -0. 25" WG e ATMOS I 1 2 TEST-SIN ~ NA e I ABNORNALI -0. 25" WG e ATNOS I 1 I 2 I TEST-8 IM s NA INANUFACTURER: NAMCQ ACCIDENTI 3 8 100 2 TEST-SIM I YES
~ IRH (/):
I I 1 I I ' I
- I -' NOTE
~ NODEL NQ.: EA740 I s NORhlAL I 50 e 100 I 1 e 2 t TEST-SIN I NA I I I s I ABNORNAL s 50 s 100 I 1 s 2 I TEST-SIN I NA I SAFETY FUNCTION: ACCIDENT 100 STERN 2 I TEST-SIN t NA I I INDICATE POSITION OF TURB. ~ s I RADIATION: I s e I I - 1 s I s s
- I NOTE 1 tEXH DR ISOLATION VALVE ~ I NORM GANNAI 2 'E4 s I NA I ACC GAMMA I 2E7 I 2. 04E8 I 1 I 2 I TEST-SIN I YES I sOP. CODE: A stsNORH BETA t . NA s 1 I ~ I NA I ss ACC BETA I 1.3E7 I 1 e I YES I
ss NEUTRON I NA I I 1 ~ I I NR I I ltSPRAY I NA I NA t NA I NA ~ NA I NA ~ IACCURACY ssSUBNERGENCEI NA I NR I NA I NA I NA I t4A SPEC: NA ~ a aaa a a a I
~
DEHO: NA I I I ~ I I ~
~ ~
I IONE NO.: SC1/5106 ~ I I
~ I 'sSUBNERGENCE: NA sl DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1.FOR CQNPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, I ISPRAY: NA 1. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. I I CRITERIAs EQEDC-1 s REV 1 s NAY 2s 1984 ~ 2.NORIIAL TEt'IPERATURES ARE SHOWhl AS I EQUIPNENT NOT SUB JECT TO I I 2. VEhlDOR ENVIRONNENTAL QUAL IFICRTION REPORT, HAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. ISUBNERGENCE OR SPRAY SDDF e IEEE-O7.16O-SOOSA 3.OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FROM 33 s I 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TIME DATA SHEET: DAYS TESTED VALUEs TO 100 DAYS PLUS I I FILE NQ- FSK-27-6-C5 NARGIN, BY AhiALYSIS. I I 4. CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-41 IACCEPTABLE TQ NUREG 0588,CAT I Its ~ ~
~ I I ~ I ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~
s I'IAINT/SURVE ILL ~
~ ~ ~
I I
REFERENCE:
2 ~ I
~ ~
I ~ I I IQUALIFIED LIFE
~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~
(YEARS): 40 ~
~ ~ ~ I I I I
REFERENCE:
2 ~ I I ~ I ~ I I
~ ~
I I
~ I I I ~ ~
NINE NILE OINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUNB"R 50-410 SYSTEN CONPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 2 QUAL REF tt C051NAB REV 0 OF 2 a! js aaaa 23-Nar-85 s s
~ s ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPNENT DESCRIPTION s s ~
s I DQCUNENT REFERENCE s 's I s PARANETER t SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED I I QUAL I NARGIN I REMARKS VALUE I VALUE I SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED I METHOD I DENO IEQUIP NO.: s ~ aaaaaa s ~ s s a a s s ~ ~ ~
~
sSPEC NO.: s OPs TINE 12 HRS )100 DAYS 3 4 s AN+DATA
~ s ~
sSYSTEN: ~ t
~
sTENP
~ 'P (F) s I s s ~ I YES I NOTE 3 I I I I s ~ t NOTE 1 s
i ~ NORMAL s 104/85 i 140 s 1 s 2s4 I TEST SIN I NA I NOTE ls ABNORMALs 86 I 268 I 1 ~ 2s4 ~ TEST SIN NA TYPE (DESCRIPTION) st ACCIDENTt 325 346 s ~ ~ SOLENOID VALVE I I 1 ~ 2,4 I TEST-SIN I YES I s ~ PRESS(PSIG) I ~ I I t NOTE 1 ss NORNAL I -0 '5"WG I ATMOS s 2 s I TEST-SIN
~
s NA I ABNORNALI 0 25"WG ~ ATMOS ~ 1 ~ 2 s TEST SIN ~ NA ~ sNANUFACTURER: ASCO I ACCIDENTs 3. 8 110 I s s 1 I 2 I TEST-SIN YES
~ s RH (/) s s
s s
~ s s ~
s
~ KspxMa s'%LJsi 1 A
I INODEL NQ.: 206-380-3RF I NORMAL ~ SO ~ 100 I 1 ~ 2 ~ TEST SIN ~ NA ~ s I I ABNORNALI 50 I 100 I 1 s 2 s TEST-SIN I NA s I SAFETY FUNCTION' I ACCIDENT I 100 I STEAN I 2 TEST-SIN s 1 I I I NA TURBINE EXH. DR. ISOLATION I RADIATION I I i
~ ~ s s I NOTE 1 IVALVE I NORN GANNA s 2. 4E4 I s
s 1 t NA I s I ACC GANNA I 2E7 I 2.0E8 I 1 I 2 I TEST-SIN s YES sOP. CODE: A sl NORN BETA . NA ll 1 s s ACC BETA I 1.3E7 I 1 I YES I s sl ' s
~ ACCURACY IISPRAY ~ I NEUTRON SUBNERGENCE I
I s NA NA NA s
~
NA NA I t i 1 NA NA iNA s I NA I t i NA NA s t
~
NA NA NA I
~
I s SPEC: NA ssaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaai s ~ DEMOt NA ~
~
s s s s s ~ s
~ s s I ZONE NO.: SC17S106 ~ ~ ~ ~
s tSUBNERGENCE: NA DOCUNENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1 ~ FOR CONPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, s sSPRAY: NA I s 1 EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUNENT REFERENCED s s CRITERIAi EQEDC 1 s REV 1 s MAY 2i 1984 2.NORNAL TENPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS s sEQUIPNENT NOT SUBJECT TO I I 2. VENDOR ENVIRONNENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. tSUBNERGENCE OR SPRAY SDDF tt IEEE-07. 160-5004C 3.OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FRON 32 s s ii
- 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TINE DATA SHEET: . DAYS TESTED VALUE, TO 100 DAYS PLUS I s
Il FILE NO ~ FSK-27-6-C5 NARG IN, BY ANALYSIS. I I 4 ~ CALCULATION NO. 12177.-EQS-16 sACCEPTABLE TO NUREG OSGG,CAT I I t 5. ASCO INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE s INSTRUCTION FORM V-5969 AND V-5999 s s s ~ s s ~ s s
~ s s s ILL-s ~
I NAINT/SURVE s
~
s
~
s
REFERENCE:
4,S ~ s s
~
Is QUALIFIED LIFE s I s I s s
~
(YEARS): 40 s s s s
REFERENCE:
2,4 ~
~
s s
~ s s s s ~ ~ ~ ~ s ~ s s ~ ~ s
NINE NILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUNBER 50-410 SYSTEN COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 2 QUAL REF II COSINAC REV 0 23-Nar-85 e c s ztgtc s gse s cs s RvRs s = ~
~ ~ ~
s ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ~
~ ~ ~
s ~ s s DOCUNENT REFERENCE a s eezzMse s s MME M?a I I PARANETER ~ SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED ~ QUAL IMARGINI REMARKS I s VALUE I VALUE s SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED s NETHOD s DEI'10 a s EQUIP NO.: 2ICS+AOV110 s s s s RclR s R K ~ R7 cR ~ ~ Rs zsDz ~ a ~ I SPEC NO.: C051N I I OP. TINE: I 12 HRS I >100 DAYS I 3 I 4 s AN+DATA s YES I NOTE 3
'TENP (F)' ' ' I NOTE 1 sSYSTEN: REACTOR CORE I s
ISOLATION I I NORMAL s 104/85 ~ 194 s 1 ~ 2 s TEST SIM ~ NA ~ NOTE 2 s s I s ABNORNALI 86 I 194 I 1 I 2 I TEST-SIM I NA a TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) ~ ACCIDENT ~ 325 s 380 I 1 I 2 ~ TEST SIN I YES I LINIT SWITCH I I PRESS(PSIG) I
' I ~ I s NOTE 1 Il NORNAL s -0.25"WG I ATNOS I 1 I 2 I TEST-SIN I NA s
sl ABNORMAL<< -0.2S"WG a ATNOS s 1 I 2 a TEST-SIN I NA s
<<MANUFACTURER: NAMCO s I ACCIDENT a 3. 8 s 100 s 1 s 2 I TEST-SIN I YES FL ~ l ~
s s s
~
i ~
~ ~
s s s'<<0<<E
~ s 1
INODEL NO.: EA740 sl NORMAL I SO s 100 ~ 1 s 2 s TEST-SIM ~ NA s s II ABNORNALI 50 I 100 s 1 I 2 I TEST-SIN I NA s I SAFETY FUNCTION: ss ACCIDENTS 100 s STEAN s 1 s 2 I TEST-SIN I NA I INDICATE POSITION OF TURB. RADIATION s s ~ s, a s s NOTE 1 s IEXH DR ISOLATION VALVE <<I NORN GANNAs 2.4E4 s 1 s s I NA I s I I ACC GAMNA s 2E? I 2.04E8 I 1 I 2 I TEST-SIM s YES sOP. CODE: A II NORN BETA s NA s 1 s s a NA I s II ACC BETA s 1.3E7 s 1 s s s YES s s as NEUTRON a NA s s 1 I NA I s a I SPRAY I NA s NA I NA s NA I NA I NA ~ IACCURACY IsSUBNERGENCEI NA I NA I NA I NA s NA a NA SPEC: NA s s
~ ~
DEMO: NA s
~
s a s s
~ s I IONE NO.: SC17S106 s s ~
s ~ s
~
ISUBMERGENCE: NA ss DOCUNENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1 ~ FOR CONPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, I
<<SPRAY: NA l. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONNENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED.
s CRITERIA, EQEDC-1, REV 1, NAY 2, 1984. 2.NORNAL TENPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS
~ EQUIPNENT NOT SUBJECT TO 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. <<SUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY s s SDDF II 1EEE-07 160-S005A ~ 3.OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FROM 33 I s
s s s 3. EQUIPNENT OPERABILITY TINE DATA SHEET: DAYS TESTED VALUE, TO 100 DAYS PLUS s s FILE NO. FSK-27-6-C5 MARGIN, BY ANALYSIS. I 4. CALCULATION NO. 1217?-EQS-41 I ACCEPTABLE s TO NUREG 0588 e CAT II I s s s s
~ s ~ ~
s ~ ~
~ ~
s el I NAINT/SURVEILL ~
~ ~ ~
REFERENCE:
2 ~
~ ~ ~
s ~ s I QUALIFIED LIFE - ~ s s s s s I (YEARS): 40 s s s
~
REFERENCE:
? s s ~
s
~ s ~ s s s s ~
a ~ s s s s s s s
~ ~
NINE I'IILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 2 QUAL REF tt C051MAC REV 0 OF 2 ~ ---------------
--=--- -- aaaa---a-aaaaa aaaa-a --a a -a- --aa-a-aa-a--- aaa- -- 23-Nar-85 ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ~
s s s s
~ I I DOCUNENT REFERENCE al I PARANETER I SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED QUAL MARG 1 N s ~ ~ REMARKS I VALUE VALUE SPECIFIED QUALIFIED I EQUIP tSPEC NO.:
NO.: 2ICS+AOV110 ~
~ ~ ~
e s
~ ~
I s
~
s
~
s s s
~ I s
s NETHQD s
~
DENO aa s
~ a-C051N '(Q ~ ~ s OP ~ TINE ~ 12 HRS ~ )100 DAYS I 3 I 4 AN+DATA YES NOTE 3 sSYSTEM: REACTOR CORE ~ I TENP (F) I ' I ~ ~ ~ s I s s 'see aE e s ISOLATION s I NORMAL 104/85 I 140 2,4 TEST-SIM ~ ~
s s 1 s s I NA I NOTE 2 ABNORMAL', 86 I 268 I 1 I 2,4 I TEST-SIM I NA I TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) ACCIDENTS 325 s ~ I 346 I 1 s 2 )4 ~ TEST SIN s YES SOLENOID VALVE I I PRESS (PSIG) I I I I
~
I NQTE 1 s I s NORMAL s -0. 2S" NG s ATt'lOS s 1 s 2 s TEST-SIN e NA s s s I s ABNORNAL s -0.25" NG ~ ATMOS s 1 t 2 I TEST-SIM s I NA s INANUFACTURER: ASCO I ACCIDENT I 3. 8 110 s e s I 1 I 2 s TEST-SIM s YES s s s sRH \(II I ~ s s s s s s s s sMMt ~ s s'sees' s IMODEL NO.: 206-380-3RF II NORNAL I 50 I 100 I 1 s s 2 s I TEST-SIN s s NA s s ABNQRMALI 50 I 100 I 1 ', 2 I TEST-SIN I NA ISAFETY FUNCTION: I ACCIDENT 100 STEAM TURBINE EXH. DR. ISOLATION
~ s s t 1 I 2 e TEST SIN I NA I s
I s RADIATION ~ I I I I NOTE IVALVE ss NORM GANNAs 2 'E4 e 1 I s s I NA I s 1 I s ACC GANNA s 2E7 I 2. OEG I 1 I 2 I TEST-SIN YES IOP. CODE: A ss NORN BETA NA ' s ~ s s 1 s NA I ACC BETA e 1 ~ 3E7 t 1 I YES s s es NEUTRON t NA s s NA I s s ISPRAY I NA I NA I NR I NR I NA I NA s tACCURACY isSUBNERGENCEs NA NA NA NA NA s
~ s I I ~ NA s s
SPEC: NA ~ s s
~ ~
DENO: NA s
~
s s I ZONE NO.: SCi?5106 ~ s
~ ~
ISUBNERGENCE: NA DOCUNENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES 1 ~ FOR CONP'TE ENVIRONNENTAL CONDITIONS ~ ~ eSPRAY: NA I e 1. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONNENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. I I CRITERIR, EQEDC-i, REV 1, NAY 2, 1984. 2.NORMAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS IEQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO ll 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, NAX DESIGN/AVERRGE. sSUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY s s s Is I t II 3 SDDF tt IEEE-07.160-5004C EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TINE DATA FILE NO. FSK-27-6-C5 SHEET'AYS 3.OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FROM 32 TESTED VALUE, TO 100 DAYS PLUS NARGIN, BY ANALYSIS's 4 ~ CALCULATION NQ 12177 EQS 16 IACCEPTABLF TO NUREG OS88,CAT III S. ASCO INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE s s Is INSTRUCTION FORM V-5969 AND V-5999 I s ~ s s ~ s s s s s s s s
~ s I NAINT/SURVE ILL II I
s
REFERENCE:
4,5
~ ~
s ~ ~ s IQUALIFIED LIFE e s ~ s ~ s I (YEARS): 40 s s
REFERENCE:
2,4 ~
~
s s
~ ~ ~ ~ s t I s
e NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEN CQNPQNENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 2 QUAL REF ¹ C051MAD REV 0 23-Nar-85 ~ aaaaaaaa a aaaaa ee a aaaa a aaa! 'a a a 'a a 'a a a a a a a aaaaaaa e
~
e e ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION e e
~ ~
DOCUMENT REFERENCE
---aa ~ ~ e e I ~ ---aaaaaaase ~ I PARANETER ~ SPECIFIED s QUALIFIED I I QUAL INARGINs REMARKS e VALUE ~ VALUE e SPECIFIED e QUALIFIED s NETHOD s DENO I I EQUIP NO.: 2ICS+AOV130 aaaaaaa'aaaaaaa aaa'aaa ==-=-=='==- -= = ~ === aaaaaasaaaaaasaaaaaaa I SPEC NO.: C051M ~ s QP TINE I 12 HRS s )100 DAYS s 3 e 4 ~ AN+DATA s YES I NOTE 3 eSYSTEN: REACTOR CORE s ~ TENP (F) I I s e s I ~ NOTE ISOLATION s e NORNAL I 104/85 s 194 I 1 I 2 s TEST-SIN s NA s NOTE 2 e te ABNORNALI 86 I 194 e 1 s 2 I TEST-SIM s NA I TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) ACCIDENT 325 380 2 TEST SIN s
LINIT SWITCH
~ ~ 'PRESS(PSIG) ~
I ' I I 1 I
~
s YES
-'~
NOTE t e NQRNAL I 0 ~ 25 WG I ATNQS t 1 I 2 I TEST SIN s NA ~ ls ABNQRNALI -0.25"WG I ATMOS I 1 I 2 I TEST-SIN I NA I INANUFACTURERz NANCO I ACCIDENT I 3.8 100 1 I 2 TEST-SIM YES I s s IRH (/): e I s e I ' s s
' -I NOTE 1 sMODEL NO.: EA740 I I NORNAL I 50 I 100 I 1 s 2 I TEST SIN s NA ~ I e
I s ABNORNAI I 50 I 100 I 1 e 2 e TEST-SIN s NA s I SAFETY FUNCTION: I ACCIDENT 100 STEAM I 2 TEST-8IM NA I INDICATE POSITION QF ST LINE s I I RAD I AT ION: s I t I t 1 I I e I s s
- I NOTE 1 e
I DR. ISOLATION VALVE ls NORM GANMA ~ 2.4E4 e 1 e NA e I e I I ACC GANMA I 2E7 I 2 04EG
~ I 1 I 2 I TEST-SIM I YES eOP. CODE: A le NORM BETA I NA 1 e NA e
e tl ACC BETA I 1.3E7 I 1 e I YES e e I ~ NEUTRON I NA 1 s NA t s e s (SPRAY I NA I NA I NA I NA I NA I NA I IACCURACY IISUBMERGENCEI NA I NA I NA NA NA " NA SPEC: NA ssaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa e
= ------- -- -- s aaa s
a---a--a s a aaaaaaaa aaa' DENOs NA ~
~ ~ ~ e ~ e IZONE NO.: SC 175106 ~
e e e ISUBNERGENCE: NA st DOCUNENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1.FQR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, I ISPRAY: NA I ~ 1. EQUIPNENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONNENTAL DESIGN SEE'HE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. e e CRITERIA, EQEDC-1, REV 1, NAY 2, 1984. 2.NORMAL TENPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS sEQUIPNENT NOT SUBJECT TO t I 2. VENDOR ENVIRONNENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, I'IAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. eSUBNERGENCE OR SPRAY I I SDDF ¹ IEEE-07. 160-S005A 3.OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FROM 3. I e
~ s 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TINE DATA SHEET: DAYS TESTED VALUE, TO 100 DAYS PLUS e
e I ~ FILE NO. FSK-27-6-CS NARGIN, BY ANALYSIS. e e s t 4. CALCULATION NO. 1217?-EQS-41 sACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT ~ e e ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
e e I PAINT/SURVE ILL ~
~ ~
e
REFERENCE:
2 e e
~ ~ ~ e IQUALIFIED LIFE ~ e ~ ~
e ~ (YEARS): 40 e
~ ~ ~
REFERENCE:
2 e e
~ ~ ~ e ~ ~ ~ e ~ ~
e e
~ e
NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 2 QUAL REF (l C051MAD REV 0 OF 2 KCl R 23-Mar-85
~ s casRKRsszJ RK a Rs ~ s ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION s s
s
~
l DOCUMENT REFERENCE l I ~ PARAMETER ~ SPECIFIED s QUALIFIED l l QUAL IMARGINl
-s REMARKS l l
s EQUIP NO.: 2ICS+AOV130 s ia s
~
s xjRDzaR s VALUE I VALUE RR s SPECIFIED l QUALIFIED masse-m-asm'---ala s METHOD
--al a DEMO l ~
l SPEC NO.: ~ lSYSTEM: C051M REACTOR CORE ISOLATION I lOP. TIME: llTEMP(F>:s---- a NORMAL l 12 HRS 104/85 l l
>100 DAYS 140 - s l -- --
3
. I l
4 l I AN+DATA TEST-SIM I I ---I YES l NOTE 3 NOTE 1
~ s a l 1 s 2a4 a l NA I NOTE 2 s
I s ABNORMALl 86 I 268 l 1 l 2,4 TEST-SIM l NA l I TYPE: s (DESCRIPTION> I l ACCIDENT I 325 346 SOLENOID VALVE a s 1 l 2a4 I TEST SIM i YES I l IPRESS(PSIG) l l ll l
~
s l s l NOTE 1 NORMAL l -0.25"WG l ATMOS l 1 I 2 l TEST-SIM l NA 1 ~ ABNORMAL' 25 'WG I ATMOS l 1 s 2 l TEST-SIM I NA I lMANUFACTURER: ASCO l I ACCIDENT( 3 8 110 I ~ 1 l 2 a TEST SIM l YES I l ~ a l = l l l NOTE BIVALVE sMODEL NO.: 206-380-3RF s I 1 s l s NORMAL ii 50 s 100 l 1 l 2 I TEST-SIM I NA s s l I ABNORMAL( 50 I 100 l 1 l 2 s TEST-SIH l NA ISAFETY FUNCTION: l ACCIDENT 100 STEAM s l TURBINE EXH. DR. ISOLATION s s a s 1 I 2 l TEST-SIM l NA l s ~ RADIATION I l l s s s s NOTE 1 NORM GAMMAI 2.4E4 I 1 I l NA I I ACC GAMMA l 2E7 l 2.0E8 a 1 l 2 a TEST-SIM YES l lOP. CODE: A I l NORM BETA s . NA I 2 s ll ACC BETA s 1.3E7 a s I 1 1 s 2 s ii NA l YES s s al NEUTRON l NA s 1 s 2 NA sl slSPRAY ~ NA I NA s NA l NA l NA s NA s sACCURACY SUBMERGENCEl NA l NA l NA s ~
. ~ NA ~ NA I NA s SPEC: NA s s
s
~ ~l s
s
~ DEMO: NA ~ ~
s s
'A ~ ~
s ~ s
>ZONE NO.: SC175106 ll (SUBMERGENCE:
aiSPRAY: NA ll DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES 1 FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS a l s I s 1 EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED ~ s l l CRITERIA, EQEDC-1, REV 1, MAY 2, 1984. 2.NORMAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS IEQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO s I 2 ~ VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. sl sSUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY s s s s sl s 3 SDDF (l IEEE-07. 160-5004C EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TIME DATA FILE NO. FSK-27-6-C5 SHEET'AYS 3.OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED TESTED VALUE, TO 100 DAYS PLUS MARGIN, BY ANALYSIS. FROM 32 l I s 4~ CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-16 aACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT Il l 5. ASCO INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE l s s I INSTRUCTION FORM V-5969 AND V-5999 s ~ s s s s s
~ s s s ~
s s ~ I MAINT/SURVEILL ~
~
s s s s
REFERENCE:
4,5 s s
~
s a s LIFE s s s I QUALIFIED s s s s (YEARS): 3. 0 s
~ ~ ~
REFERENCE:
2,4 ~
~
s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s ~ s s
NINE NILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUNBER SO-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION IaIORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 2 QUAL REF ¹ COS1MAE REV 0 23-Nar-85
~ ~
a
~ ENVIRONNENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION a a ~ ~
a ~ a a DOCUNENT REFERENCE e a ~ Re CIRRe a s I PARANETER I SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED s I QUAL aNARGINI RENARKS I VALUE VALUE I SPECIFIED QUALIFIED NETHOD I DEMO s a ~ ~ ~ IEQUIP NO.: 2ICS+AOV131 z2ee&Re K v cDe eiSPEC sSYSTEN: a NO.: C051M REACTOR CORE ISOLATION s I IITENP (F): I e OP TINE' NORNAL I I --104/85-- 12 HRS I I
)100 194 DAYS ~
I 3 1 I 2
~
I I
--- ---I AN+DATA TEST-SIN ~
I s YES NA I I NOTE 3 NOTE NOTE 2 1 I I ABNORNALI 86 I 194 I 1 a 2 I TEST SIN ~ NA ~ I TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) I ACCIDENT 325 380 2 TEST SIN LIMIT SNITCH
~ 'PRESS(PSIG) s ~
I 1 I
~
I YES
-' NOTE 1 a
a I I NORNAL I 0 25 WG e ATMOS I 1 a 2 I TEST SIM I NA I I ABNQRNALI -0. 25" Is)G I ATNOS I 1 I 2 s TEST-SIN I NA sMANUFACTURER: NAMCO I I ACCIDENT I 3.8 I 100 I 1 2 I TEST-SIM I YES I (/): - s saRH a ~ I a a a a s a s
-s NOTE a Pa~I 1 ~
aMODEL NO.: EA740 I I NORMAL I 50 s 100 ~ 1 I 2 I TEST SIN I NA I a a I I ABNORI'IALI 50 I 100 I 1
'EST-SIN I NA I SAFETY FUNCTION: ACCIDENT 100 STEAN 2 TEST SIN ei INDICATE POSITION OF ST LINE IDR. ISOLATION VALVE s
I s s RADIATION: a I - I I I I 1 I s I i i s NA a I NOTE 1 a a I I NORM GANNA ~ 2 ~ 4E4 a 1 I a s I ACC GANNA I 2E7 I 2.04EG I 1 I 2 I TEST-SIN I YES s a IOP. CODE: A Is NQRN BETA I NA s NA a se ACC BETA I 1.3E7 I 1 I YES s a ls NEUTRON
'A I NA e NA I a
a IISPRAY I NA I NA s NA I NA ~ NA sACCURACY I I SUBMERGENCE I NA NA NA NA
~ s ~ s i NA SPEC: NA ~ ~
DEMO: NA ~ a e a a a
~ ~ ~ a a ZONE NO.:
a I SC175106 a
~
a a sSUBNERGENCE: NA la DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES! 1.FOR COMPLETE ENVIRQNNENTAL CONDITIONS,I ISPRAY: NA I I 1- EQUIPNENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. a a I I CRITERIA, EQEDC-1, REV 1, NAY 2, 1984. 2.NORNAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS IEQUIPNENT NDT SUBJECT TO I I 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, NAX DESIGN/AVERAGE sSUBNERGENCE OR SPRAY SDDF ¹ IEEE-07 ~ 160-5005A 3 OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FROM 33 I a a s s a. EQUIPNENT OPERABILITY TINE DATA SHEET: DAYS TESTED VALUE, TO 100 DAYS PLUS a I I. FILE NO. FSK-27-6-C5 MARGIN, BY ANALYSIS. I a a s I 4. CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-41 IACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT ~ a a ~ ~ a ~ a
~ ~
a a e e e
~ a a ~ ~
a
~ ~
INAINT/SURVEILL ~ a a a I
REFERENCE:
2 a e ~ QUALIFIED LIFE a a I II I (YEARS): 40 a a a a
REFERENCE:
2 a a
~ ~
a a ~
~ ~ ~ a a a a e e a
NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 2 QUAL REF (l C051MAE OF 2 REV 0 EIRcc cl~Ãi Gaia RD ~ R ssRza R~Rs Ra x Ra s 23-Mar-85 s s ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION I EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ~ I s DOCUMENT REFERENCE
++~~++--~- I I PARAMETER ~ SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED I a
QUAL IMARGINs I REMARKS s VALUE I VALUE I SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED I METHOD ~ DEMO 2ICS AOV131 ~ ~
< a~ ms aaaa ma ala a aaa I SPEC NO ' COSiM a
I
~
OP TIME'
~
12 HRS )100 s s ~
~ s DAYS I 3 I 4 I AN+DATA ~ YES I NOTE 3 I
~ SYSTEM REACTOR CORE I ~ TEMP (F) I I I s I s I NOTE 1 ISOLATION ~ ~ NORMAL I 104/85 ~ 1 40 I 1 I 2s4 ~ TEST S IM I NA I NOTE 2 s I ABNQRMALa 86 I 268 I 1 I 2,4 s TEST-SIM I NA I TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) ACCIDENT I 325 346 2,4 TEST-SIM i1 I I I I 1 I I I YES I I SOLENOID VALVE IPRESS(PSIG) s ~ ~ I s ~ I s NOTE 1 . I
~ s NORMAL I 0 25 'WG s ATMOS I 1 I 2 s TEST-SIM I NA Is ABNORMALI -0.25"WG TEST-SIM i1 s ATMOS s I 2 s I NA I IMANUFACTURER: ASCO I I ACCIDENT I 3.8 s 110 I 1 I 2 I TEST-SIM I YES I MODEL. NO.: 206-380-3RF s ~ PaH (I I s s s ~
s
~
I I -I NOTE 1 s s I NORMAL I 50 I 100 s I 2 I TEST-8 1M I NA I ISAFETY FUNCTION: I I ABNORMALI SO I 100 I 1 2 . I TESTS I M I NA I s I ACCIDENTs 100 I STEAM ~ s 2 s TEST-SIM I NA ~ I TURBINE EXH DR ISOLATION I RADIATION I s . ~ I I s s I NOTE 1 IVALVE sl NORM GAMMAI 2.4E4 s II ACC GAMMA I 2E7 I 2 OE8 s 1 I 2 ~ TEST SIM YES
~ QP. CODE: A II NORM BETA I , NA I I 1 I ~
NA
~
I II ACC BETA I 1 ~ 3E7 I a 1 I s s s YES I ia NEUTRON I NA ~ I 1 I NA I slSPRAY NA
' s NA NA sACCURACY ~ ISUBMERGENCEI NA s
s NA a NA a I NA NA I NA NA I I NA NA si c ns r ~ sass NA s ~ s=
~
s ~ DEMO: NA ~ ~ s s s s ~ s a ZONE NO.: SC175106 II aSUBMERGENCE: NA I I DOCUMENT REFERENCE NOTES: 1.FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, I
~ SPRAY: NA I I 1 EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED I I CRITERIAs EQEDC 1 i REV 1 i MAY 2i 1984 ~ 2.NORMAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS s EQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO s I 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE.
ISUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY I I SDDF ll I EEE-07 ~ 160-S004C 3.OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FROM 32 s a 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TIME DATA SHEET: DAYS TESTED VALUE, TO 100 DAYS PLUS I sl FILE NO. FSK-27-6-CS MARGIN, BY ANALYSIS. I I 4~ CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-16 I ACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588, CAT I s I 5. ASCO INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE I I INSTRUCTION FORM V-5969 AND V-5999 I s s s s s s s s s s s s s ~ a s s s s s s s I MAINT/SURVE ILL ~ s s
REFERENCE:
4,5 I
~ ~ ~
I
~ ~ s ~ QUALIFIED LIFE ~ ~
a (YEARS): 3 0 ~ s ~ I
REFERENCE:
2s4 ~ ~
~ s ~ s ~ s ~ ~ ~ s ~ s ~ s ~ ~
NINE NILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEN CONPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET m PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF ¹ COS1NAF REV 19-Nar-85 aa a a aaa aaa a a aa a aa aaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaa a aaa ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICRTION EQUIPNENT DESCRIPTION s s I DOCUNENT REFERENCE I ~ aaaaaaaa a a aa aa aaa aaaaaa s PARAMETER s SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED s I QUAL INARGINI REMARKS SPECIFIED QUALIF1ED METHOD DENO s IEQUIP NO.: 2ICS+FV)08 aa, s VALUE a a ------- I VALUE I
,= raaaaaaaai s
aaaa aa I I a a a,aaaaaa,aaaaaa aaaaa sSPEC NO.: C051N sOP TINE: 12 HOURS 100 DAYS I 3 2,4 TEST-S I M NOTE 4 sSYSTEM: ITENP (F)
~ ~
I
' ---- I ' - ' ---- t I
s s NOTE 1 I NORNAL s 104/8S I 122 s 1 s 2 TEST SIN I NA s NOTE 2 I ABNORNALs 86 I 122 I 1 I 2 iTEST-SIN s t NA I TYPE "(DESCRIPTION) ACCIDENT I 32S i 340 1 2e5 TEST-SIN YES
-I NOTE ~ ~ ~
s INOTOR OPERATED VALVEr 'PRESS(PSIG) ' ' ' s I ' 1 IH.K.PORTER DC MOTOR, CLASS s NORMAL I 0 25"WG I 0 I 1 s 2 TEST-SIN s NA s I INSULATION ~ ABNORMAL' 25"WG. I 0 I 1 I 2 I TEST-SIN s NA s NANUFACTURER: LINITORQUE ~ ACCIDENT I 3 8 I 105 I 1 I 2e5 TEST-SIN I YES I s ('I 1 s s s NOTE 1 sNODEL NO.: SNB-00-5 NORMRL s 50 I 100 I 1 s 2 s TEST-SIN I NA s ABNORNAL ~ 50 ~ 100 s 1 I 2 I TEST-SIN I NA s SAFETY FUNCTION: I ACCIDENTs 100 I STEAN I 1 I 2,5 I TEST-SIN s NA sTEST BYPASS TO CONDENSATE I RADIATION NOTE 1 ISTORAGE TANK FLOW CONTROL ~ NORN GANMAI 2.4E4 I 1 s s TEST-SIN I NA IVALVE t ACC GAMMA I 2E7. 1. 66E8 s TEST-SIN I YES s NOTE 5 sOP. CODE: A I NORM BETA I NA I I 1 I s I NA s s s ACC BETA I 1.3E7 I s 1 I I YES si s I NEUTRON s NA s I 1 s. I NA I s ISPRAY NA s YES I NA s 2 TEST-SI M t NA IACCURRCY ISUBMERGENCEt NA I NA I NA I NA I NA s NA SPEC: NA I aaaaaa a a aa a DEMO: NA s s ZONE NO.: SC175106 s sSUBMERGENCE: NA DOCUNENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES 1 FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS e ~ sSPRAY: NA 1 ~ EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONNENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. CRITERIAe EQEDC-1, REV 1, NAY 2, 1984. 2.NORMAL TENPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS NAX
~ EQUIPNENT NOT SUBJECT TO 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, DESIGN/AVERAGE.
sSUBNERGENCE OR SPRAY SDDF ¹ RSTD DATED 3-19-79 FOR REPORT B0009 3.QUALIFIED LIFE IS BASED ON EONE SPE-EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TIME DATA SHEET: CIFIC ENVIRONNENTAL VALUES, WHICH s FILE NO. 27-6-C2 INCORPORATE MAXINUN, NININUN AND
~ DOCUNENTATION RCCEPTABILITY: CALCULATION NUNBER 12177-EQS-026 AVERAGE CONDITIONS. EXTENSION OF sACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,C AT It s 5. GE PHASE 3 TEST REPORT THE QUALIFIED LIFE WILL BE INCREASED LINI-s s I SDDF ¹ IEEE 016.820-5007C PENDING CONPLETION OF THE GE s
s s TORQUE TESTING PROGRAN. s 4.OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FROM s s 30 DAYS TESTED VALUE TO 100 DAYS BY s MAINT/SURVEILL s s ANALYSIS'EE REFERENCE 4 ~
REFERENCE:
2 5.RADIATION QUALIFICATION EXTENDED FRON s s 20 MEGARADS IN REF. 2 TO ibb NEGARRDS LIFE s I QUALIFIED s BY REF. S (GE PHASE 3 TEST HAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED TEST-I REPORT),'HICH i (YEARS): 2 (SEE NOTE W)
REFERENCE:
4 s ING UP TO 30 DAYS OF POST-LOCA TEST-ING.
~ I ~ s s s s ~
II
NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORV< SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF ¹ C051MAG REV 0 23-Mar-85 a e R R a s R a RR Qsa c~s ~RÃ Dczc R e cxa B c~a a r R Gas R K z R Rz N R ~ s s
~
s ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIQNS'ND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION e s a
~
I ~ DOCUMENT REFERENCE I I I PARAMETER ~ SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED QUAL I MARGIN s REMARKS s s
~ I I VALUE VALUE SPECIFIED QUALIFIED METHOD DEMO I I EGU I P NO.: 2 I CSssPCV1 15 ,, -ma=====a== I ma=a === =='s=aaasa== =m I am=ma===-=a ~ ~ '+a I ~ ====a=a '=a-aaaa====
s
'==== ~
a a ~ I SPEC NO.: C051M OP. TIME: 12 HRS I >100 DAYS I 3 4 AN+DATA YES NOTE 3 sSYSTEM: REACTOR CORE s e I ITEMP (F): I
----- ----- --- - I I
I
- - -I -
s NOTE 1 s ISOLATION ~ I NORMAL I I 104/85 I I 194 I s 1 I I 2 s s TEST SIM a I NA ~ 'OTE 2 I I I ABNORMAL! 86 I 194 I 1 I 2 I TEST-SIM a NA I I TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) I I ACCIDENTS 32S e 380 I 1 ~ 2 ~ TEST SIM I YES ~ LIMIT SWITCH ~ I PRESS(PSIG) I I I I s s s NOTE 1 s NORMAL s -0.25"WG I ATMOS s 1 I 2 s TEST-SIM I NA s s s ABNORMAL s -0.2S "WG as ATMOS I 1 a 2 I TEST-SIM a NA I eMANUFACTURER: NAMCO ~ I ACCIDENT I 3 8 I 100 a 1 s 2 s TEST SIM ~ YES s s s ~ ~ s a~Ma a'sOsF e ~ s s s ~ s 1 sMODEL NO.: EA740 I ~ NORMAL s 50 s 100 ~ 1 ~ 2 I TEST SIM s NA ~
~ I ABNORMALI 50 e 100 I I I 2 I TEST SIM ~ NA ~
ISAFETY FUNCTION: s ~ ACCIDENT ~ 100 s STEAM ~ 1 I 2 I TEST SIM I NA ~ s I INDICATE POSITION OF TURBINE ~ s RADIATION I
' I s I I I NOTE 1 ~ LUBE OIL PRESSURE VALVE II NORM GAMMAI 2s4E4 s 1 aa NA I e
s I I ACC GAMMA I 2E7 s 2 04E8 I 1 I 2 I TEST SIM I YES I s OP. II NORM BETA I NA
'A 'A I CODE: A NA 1 I sa ACC BETA I 1.3E7 I s
1 s YES I II NEUTRON I NA 1 I NA s elSPRAY NA NA NA ~ NA e eACCURACY - a I
~ I SUBMERGENCE s NA I NA ~ NA ~ NA ~ NA ~ NA s ~
SPEC: NA s s
~
s
~
DEMO: NA e
~
s s e
~ s s s s ~
I ZONE NO.: SC175106 ~ s
~ ~
ISUBMERGENCE: NA II DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1 ~ FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, I sSPRAY: NA I ~ 1. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFEREN(eED-s CRITERIA s EQEDC 1 s REV 1 s MAY 2s 1984 2.NORMAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS sEQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORTs MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. ISUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY ls SDDF ¹ IEEE-07.160-5005A 3.OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FROM 33 s s ~ I 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TIME DATA SHEET: DAYS TESTED VALUE, TO 100 DAYS PLUS a II FILE NO. FSK-27-6-C4 MARGINs BY ANALYSIS s s I 4~ CALCULATION NO 12177 EQS 41 sACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT s s s ~ s ~ s ~ s s s
~ e s s s
s ~ s s IMAINT/SURVEILL- s a
~ ~
a s
REFERENCE:
2 II
~ s s ~ ~
s I QUALIFIED LIFE s
~ ~ ~ ~ s (YEARS): 40 s ~
s s
REFERENCE:
2 s
~
s
~ ~ s ~ s ~ ~ ~ ~
s
~ ~
s s
NINE NILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEN CONPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE OF 1 QUAL REF ¹ COS1NAH REV 19-Nar-85 ~ aaaaaaaaaaaaaraaraaaaaaaaaararaaaaraaaaaaaaaaaaaraaaraaaa aaaaraaaaaaraararraraaaaaaaaaaar araa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaa ENVIRONNENTAL CONDITIONS RND QUALIFICATION EQUIPNENT DESCRIPTION ~
~ ~
I si DOCUMENT REFERENCE ss I s PARAMETER I SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED s I QUAL iNARGINi RENARKS i VALUE I VRLUE I SPECIFIED QUALIFIED I NETHOD DENO rr s s ~ tEQUIP NO.: 2RHS+FV38A a s a --s as I J sSPEC NO.: C051N ~ ~ OP TINE' 100 DAYS ~ 100 DAYS I 3 I 2s4 f TEST SIM NOTE 4 sSYSTEN: ~ iTENP (F)' . I I s ~ I I NOTE 1 IRESIDUAL HEAT RENOVAL tl NORNAL i 104/85 I 122 I 1 I 2 i TEST-SIN I NA s NOTE 2 I I II ABNORNALs 92 i 122 s I 2 I TEST-SIN s NA i TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) ACCIDENT I 175 340 2s5 TEST SIN YES
- NOTE s s s ~ ~ 1 i ~ s sNOTOR OPERATED VALVEs I 'PRESS(PSIG) ' ' ' ' ' ' ~ ~ RELIANCE AC MOTORs CLASS RH I I NORMAL I 0 25"WG s 0 I 1 I 2 I TEST SIN s NA I INSULATION Is ABNORNALI -0.25"WG si 0 I TEST-SIN I NA I MANUFACTURER: L IMITORQUE I s 'ACCIDENT ~ 2 8 ~ 25 I 1 ~ 2 I TEST SIN I YES I 'RH I I ~ ~ (/) * ~ I I I i NOTE 1 ~ NODEL NO.: . SNB-00-5 I I NORMAL I 50 s 100 s '1 si 2 I TEST-SI M I NA tl ABNORNALI 50 ~ 100 I s 2 I TEST-SIN s NA I SAFETY FUNCTION: I I ACCIDENT I 100 100 I 1 I 2, 5 I TEST-SIN NA -I si s I SUPPRESSION POOL RETURN LINE I I I RAD AT ION: s I I ~
I s NOTE 1 I ISOLATION VALVES NORM GANNA ~ 7 ~ 7E5 ~ I TEST-S IN s NA TEST SIN 5 s1 I I I ACC GANMA s 1 ~ OE8 s 1 ~ 66EG s 1 I 2s4sS I ~ YES s NOTE OP. CODE: A ll NORM BETA I . NA NA
'A I 'A s s II RCC BETA 1.3E7 i AN+DATA YES 'A I I s I I I II NEUTRON s NA I I NA I I s I SPRAY s NA I NA s NA NA NA IACCURACY SPEC: NA ~
s I >> i IISUBNERGENCEs aaaaaa a NA a I NA I NA I NA I s I DENOa NA
~ I I ~ ~
sZONE NO.: SC196114 ~
~
I
~
siSUBMERGENCE: NA ~ I DOCUMENT REFERENCE NOTES: 1 ~ FOR CONPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS~ ISPRAY: NA i s 1. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONNENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. CRITERIA s EQEDC-I s REV 1 s NAY 2s 1984. 2.NORMAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS MAX I EQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO i s 2. VENDOR ENVIRONNENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, DESIGN/AVERAGE. ISUBNERGENCE OR SPRAY II SDDF ¹ RSTD DATED 3-9-79 FOR REPORT B0003 3.QUALIFIED LIFE IS BASED ON ZONE SPE-I I I 3 EQUIPNENT OPERABILITY TINE DATA SHEET CIFIC ENVIRONNENTAL VRLUES, WHICH FILE NO. 27-7-19 INCORPORATE NAXINUM, NININUM AND s DOCUNENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: s I 4. CALCULATION NUMBER 12177-EQS-025 AVERAGE CONDITIONS. sACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT I It S. GE PHASE 3 TEST REPORT 4.OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FROM SDDF ¹ IEEE 016.820-5007C 30 DAYS TESTED VALUE TO 100 DAYS BY
~ ~ ANALYSIS.
i 5. RADIATION QUALIFICATON WAS EXTENDED FRON 20 NEGARADS IN REF. 2 TO 166 si NAINT/SURVEILL NEGARADS IN REF. 5 (GE PHASE 3 TEST i
REFERENCE:
2 s REPORT), WHICH HAS SUCCESSFULLY i COMPLETED TESTING UP TO 30 DAYS OF I QUALIFIED LIFE I ~ POST-LOCA TESTING. (YEARS): 20 (SEE NOTE 3) I I ~
~
REFERENCE:
2,4 ~ I I ~ I I
~ ~ ~ I ~ ~
NINE NILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 0 SYSTEM CONPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF II C05}NAI REV }9-Nar-85 ~ xR z csa a R 'R Ra Sea Raaj!ERR Ra R xx a aces K?ts sac5 a a a cl s ENVIRONNENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ~
~
s
~
s DOCUMENT REFERENCE
~
aa: I PARANETER I SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED s ~ QUAL IMARGINI REMARKS VALUE a VALUE a SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED I NETHOD I DENO I I EQUIP NO.: 2RHSssFV38B Ra ea aa
~ SPEC NO.: C05}N I OP TIME a 100 DAYS I 100 DAYS s 3 s 2s4 I TEST SIN s s NOTE 4 sSYSTEN: aTENP (F) s I I I NOTE 1 IRESIDUAL HEAT REMOVAL I NORMAL a 104/93 s 122 ~ 1 i 2 I TEST-SIN s NA a NOTE 2 s ABNORNALI 106 I 122 I I 2 s TEST-SIM I NA I ~ TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) s ACCIDENT I 200 ii 340 s 1 I 2,5 TEST-SIN s YES sNOTOR OPERATED VALVE, s PRESS(PSIG) s I s I s ~
s
~ NOTE 1 'RELIANCE AC NOTORs CLASS RH I NQRNAL I -0.25"WG s 0 1 s
2 TEST-SIN I NA s s INSULATION ABNORNALI -0.25"WG I 0 I s 2 TEST-SIN s NA a I NANUFACTURER: L IN I TORQUE I ACCIDENT s 2.8 I 25 I 1 I 2,5 s TEST-SIN I YES I s s RH (/): ~ ~ ~ s NOTE aNODEL NO.: SNB-00-5 s NORMAL s 50 I 100 s 1 I 2 TEST-SIN I NA s I SAFETY FUNCTION: I SUPPRESSION POOL RETURN LINE
~
is ABNQRNALs ACCIDENT
'ADIATION '
i}00 s 50 I I 100 100 I I I I I 2,5 I s s TEST SIN TEST-SIN s
~
s s NA NA
~
s s NOTE 1 a ISOLATION VALVES s NORM- GANNAs 2Eb a s
} s s TEST-SIN a NA s s
I ACC GANNA I 3. 2E7 I 1 ~ 66E8 I 1 a I TEST-S I M s YES s NOTE 5 sOP. CODE: A I NQRN BETA s NA s s I NA s I ACC BETA a 1.3E7 I I s AN+DATA ~ YES i. a a NEUTRON a NA s NA I s sSPRAY ~ NA I NA ~ NA I NA I NA s NA s sACCURACY sSUBMERGENCEI NA I NA I NA I NA a NA I NA s SPEC: NA s cl a a ~a R DD Q a RcRc asa Ra s DENO: NA s s s s s s
~ ZONE NO.: SC215122 s s
s s ISUBMERGENCE: NA DQCUNENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1.FOR CONPLETE ENVIRONNENTAL CONDITIONS, I ISPRAY: NA ~ 1 ~ EQUIPNENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONNENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. s CRITERIA, EQEDC-}, REV 1, NAY 2, 1984. 2.NORMAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS MAX IEQUIPNENT NOT SUBJECT TO I 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, DESIGN/AVERAGE. ISUBNERGENCE OR SPRAY I SDDF II RSTD DATED 3-9-79 FOR REPORT B0003 3.QUALIFIED LIFE IS BASED ON ZONE SPE-s
- 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TIME DATA SHEET: CIFIC ENVIRONNENTAL VALUES, WHICH s
FILE NO. 27-7-}9 INCORPORATE NAXINUN, NININUN AND s DOCUNENTAT ION ACCEPTABILITY: a 4. CALCULATION NUNBER 12177-EQS-025 AVERAGE CONDITIONS. IACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588sCAT I ss s 5. GE PHASE 3 TEST REPORT 4.OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FRON e SDDF (I IEEE 016.820-5007C 30 DAYS TESTED VALUE TO 100 DAYS BY ANALYSIS.
- 5. RADIATION QUALIFICATON WAS EXTENDED s FRON 20 NEGARADS IN REF. 2 TO 166 I NAINT/SURVEILL- NEGARADS IN REF. 5 (GE PHASE 3 TEST
REFERENCE:
2 REPORT), WHICH HAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED TESTING UP TO 30 DAYS OF iQUALIF I ED LIFE s s s POST-LOCA TESTING. (YEARS): 20 (SEE NOTE '3 I
REFERENCE:
2,4 ~
~
s s
NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF ¹ C051MAJ REV
-- 19-Mar-85 Ra a essa @mares-earns----- -- as s aa a s ~ ~
s
~ ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION I EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION el s
s
~ ~ ~ l DOCUMENT REFERENCE a
s z !5REIs s sas Rcl R'as asl1R asR a t I PARAMETER s SPECIFIED t QUALIFIED s QUAL l MARGIN( REMARKS s s ~ a VALUE s VALUE s SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED s METHOD DEMO l EQUIP NO.: 2RHS+FV38C ~ ~ ~ s s
~ -s=aa--=s=m== s s
s s tSPEC NO.: C051M t s OP. TIME: 100 DAYS 100 DAYS 2,4 a TEST-S IM s NOTE 4 tSYSTEM: t s TEMP (F): a s s s s s
~ 1 'OTE sRESIDUAL HEAT REMOVAL ls NORMAL a 104/93 l 122 s s s 2 a TEST-8 I M t NA NOTE 2 s
s al ABNORMALs 106 I 122 2 iTEST-S I M e a NA I l TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) a t ACCIDENTS 200 340 2,5 t TEST-S IM t YES a l MOTOR OPERATED VALVE, l aPRESS(PSIG) l s l ~ ~ NOTE 1 tRELIANCE AC MOTOR, CLASS RH al NORMAL t -0.25"WG s 0 2 s TEST-SIM iNA s e l s INSULATION aia ABNORMALt -0.25"WG l 0 2 I TEST-S IM I NA t a MANUFACTURER: LIMITORQUE a l ACCIDENTS 2.8 t 25 2 a TEST-S I M I YES a s s IRH (/): I s s s s NOTE 1 sMODEL NO ~ . SMB-00-5 l s NORMAL a 50 s 100 2 aTEST-S I M s ai NA ai s et ABNORMALl 50 s 100 2 l TEST-8 I M t NA t tSAFETY FUNCTION: a I ACCIDENT l 100 100 l TEST-S IM NA l SUPPRESSION POOL RETURN LINE s t RADIATION: l s s s s ~ ~ s NOTE 1 2,5',4,5 t ISOLATION VALVES sl NORM GAMMAt 2E6 1 s TEST-S IM t NA es ACC GAMMA l 3.2E7 1. 66EG 1 I TEST-S IM l YES a NOTE 5 sOP. CODE: A II NORM BETA NA 1 NA l s ll ACC BETA t 1 ~ 3E7 1 AN+DATA I YES sa NEUTRON s NA 1 s NA s s tsSPRAY NA NA NA NA lACCURACY lsSUBMERGENCEl NA NA NA NA SPEC: NA s s s
~
DEMO: NA ~
~
s
~ ~ s t ~ s I ZONE NO.: SC215122 s s
s s sSUBMERGENCE: NA DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1.FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, I tSPRAY: NA l l 1 ~ EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. I CRITERIA s EQEDC 1 s REV 1 s MAY 2s 1984 ~ 2.NORMAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS MAX eEQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO ~ l 2 VENDOR ENV I RONMENTAL QUALI F I CAT I ON REPORT s DESIGN/AVERAGE. ISUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY sil SDDF ¹ RSTD DATED 3-9-79 FOR REPORT B0003 3.QUALIFIED LIFE IS BASED ON ZONE SPE-s l l 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TIME DATA SHEET: CIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL VALUESs WHICH s s I FILE NO. 27-7-13 INCORPORATE MAXIMUM, MINIMUM AND IDOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: l ~ 4. CALCULATION NUMBER 12177-EQS-025 AVERAGE CONDITIONS ~ IACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT ss 5. GE PHASE 3 TEST REPORT 4.OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FROM s s SDDF ¹ IEEE 016.820-5007C 30 DAYS TESTED VALUE TO 100 DAYS BY s s s s
~ ~ ANALYSIS.
s s
~ ~
s s 5.RADIATION QUALIFICATON WAS EXTENDED FROM 20 MEGARADS IN REF. 2 TO 166 s s s s s ~ tMAINT/SURVEILL ~ s s s MEGARADS IN REF. 5 (GE PHASE 3 TEST I
REFERENCE:
2 s s
~
s REPORT), WHICH HAS SUCCESSFULLY s s s s COMPLETED TESTING UP TO 30 DAYS OF I QUALIFIED LIFE s
~ ~ ~ POST-LOCA TESTING.
I (YEARS): 20 (SEE NOTE 3) s
~
s s I
REFERENCE:
2,4 ~ s
~ ~ ~ ~
I s ~
~ s ~ s s ~ ~ s
NINE NILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET. NUNBER 50-410 SYSTEN CONPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 QUAL REF ¹ COSiNAK OF 2 REV 0 aaaa a aa a a aaa aaa 23-Nar-85 aa aaaa aa aa 'aa I I ENVIRONNENTAL CONDITIONS AND GUAL1FICATIQN s EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION DOCUMENT REFERENCE 'aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa' PARANETER 'PECIFIED 'UALIFIED I I I QUAL s MARGIN I RENARKS f VALUE VALUE SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED aasa s a I NETHOD I DENO I IEGUIP NO.: 2RHS+LV27A s a alaa aa ~ a a s aa a ea aaa aaa ~ ~ a aa aaaaa a a ~ s SPEC NO.:, C051N OP TINE I 6 HRS >200 DAYS 3 s ~ ~ I I 4 RN+DATA YES NOTE 3 TEMP (F) ' s 's s aSYSTEM: RESIDUAL HEAT I s I
~ ~
s NOTE 1 REMOVAL Il NORNAL I 204/87 s 194 s 1 a I 2 s TEST SIM I a NA I NOTE 2 II ABNORNALI 104 I 194 I 1 I 2 s a TEST-SIN s NA s I I TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) I ACCIDENT I 175 380 2 TEST SIM s ~ s 1 YES I LINIT SWITCH I sPRESS(PSIG) I s I s ~ ~ NOTE 1 II NORMAL s 0 25" WG ~ ATMOS s 1 I 2 ~ TEST SIN s NA s s ~ ABNORMALI 0 25" WG I ATMOS I 1 I 2 ~ TEST SIN ~ NA ~ aNANUFACTURER: NAMCO ACCIDENT I 2~8 100 I I ~ I 1 2 TEST SIN I YES I (/)
~ ~
s s s s s s ~ ~ espvFc s s s s ~ aaasa x~ s sNODEL NO.: EA740 al NORNAL 50
~
100 s2 2 TEST-SIN s I a 1 I s I NA a
~ ABNORNALI 50 I 100 s 1 I 2 ~ TEST SIM s NA I SAFETY FUNCTION: ACCIDENT 100 STEAN I a s s I 1 a s TEST-S IM I NA I I INDICATING THE POSITION OF I ~ RADIATION I I ~ I I s ~ NOTE I THE ISOLRT ION VALVES FOR s I NORN GAMMAI 1. 1Eb s s 1 I s s NA I STN CONDENSING NODE OF RHS I ACC GANNA I 5 4E7 2 04E8 2 ~ I ~ 1 I I TEST S IM ~ YES IOP. CODE: A sl NQRN BETA I , NA s I 1 s NA If ACC BETA s 1.3E7 I 1 I YES s
I fs NEUTRON NA sACCURACY slSPRAY I'UBMERGENCE'A s s NA sNRNA l I NA 1 I NA I NA I s NA NA I I SPEC: NA aaaaa--a-aa --a-a- -----aa aaa- -aaaa- --------aa-a aaa---aa-aa-aa s I NA ~ NA I NA s NA I s ~ DEMO: NA s s
~ s s ~ s s sZONE NO.: ABN17505 s
ISUBNERGENCE: NA la DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1.FQR COMPLETE ENVIRONNENTAL CONDITIONS, I I SPRAY: NA I I 1. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONNENTRL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUNENT REFERENCED-CRITERIA, EQEDC-1, REV 2, NAY 2, 2984 ~ 2.NORMAL TENPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS IEQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TQ s s 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, NAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. sSUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY II SDDF ¹ IEEE-07. 160-5005A 3.OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FRON 33 EQUIPNENT OPERABILITY TINE DATA SHEET: DAYS TESTED VALUE, TO 100 DAYS PLUS s FILE NO. FSK-27-7-2 MARGIN, BY ANALYSIS. e I 4 ~ CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-41 I I ACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588 s CAT I ~ II
~ s I ~ s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s s
s NA INT/SURVE ILL ~ s a
REFERENCE:
2 ~ I
~ ~
LIFE
~ ~
I QUALIFIED (YEARS): 40 /
REFERENCE:
2 I s s
~ s s s ~ ~ ~ s s s s s s s s ~
( NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUNBFR 50-410 SYSTEN CONPQNENT EVALUATION WQRK SHEET PAGE 2 OF 2 23-Nar-BS QUAL REF tt C051NAK REV 0 aaaaaaaaa = = aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaa ==== aaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa-a-a ==- I
~ ~ ~ ENVIRONNENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPNENT DESCRIPTION I DOCUNENT REFERENCE I I aaa I I PARANETER I SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED I I QUAL INARGINI REMARKS. I VALUE I VALUE I SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED I NETHOD s DEMO I I s EQUIP NQ.: 2RHS+LV17A a a aaa a a 'a a a aa 'aal a aa a a aaa a a as a ~ a a 'a at SPEC NO.: C051N OP. TINE: 6 HRS >100 DAYS I 3 4 AN+DATA I YES NOTE 3 '40 I I I I I I
I sSYSTEM: RESIDUAL HEAT slTEMP (F) ' - - - I I t . -I s NOTE 1 RENOVAL NORMAL '04/87 s s s 1 'I 2,4 I TEST-SIM I NA I NOTE 2 I I Is ABNORMALs 104 I 268 I 1 s 2,4 s TEST-SIN I NA I ~ TYPE (DESCRIPTION) I ACCIDENT 175 s 346 1 ~ 2r4 I TEST SIM t YES ~ SOLENOID VALVE PRESS (PSIG) I s I I NOTE 1 I I I ~ NORMAL I 0 25'G I ATNOS I 1 2 I TEST-SIN I NA I I s I ABNORMALI -0 25"
~ WG I ATMOS I 1 s 2 I TEST-SIM ~ NA I INANUFACTURER: ASCO I I ACCIDENTs 2 8 I 110 1 2 I TEST SIM I YES I I
I I IRH (%): s s s
~ ~ , I I -I NOTE 1 INODEL NO.:
I 206-380-3RF ll NORMAL ~ SO I 100 s 1 I 2 I TEST SIM ~ NA st ABNORNALs 50 s 100 s 1 I 2 I TEST SIN I NA ISAFETY FUNCTION: Il ACCIDENTI 100 I STEAN I 1 I 2 I TEST-SIN I NA I ISOLATION VALVE FOR RADIATION ' ' I I ' I I NOTE 1 ISTN CONDENSING MODE OF RHS I I NORM GANNA I 1. 1E6 I 1 I 2 I I NA I I I I ACC GANNA t 5 }E7 s 2 OEB I 1 I 2 s TEST SIN ~ YES I IOP. CODE: A sl NORM BETA I . NA 1 I 2 I NA s I II ACC BETA s 1.3E7 I I 1 I YES tl NEUTRON I NA 2 I s NA slSPRAY s NA I NA I NA I NA t NA I NA IACCURACY- ~ ISUBMERGENCEI NA s NA s NA I NA I NA s NA ~ I I SPEC: NA I I
~
I I I ~ I DEMO: NA I ~ I I I ZONE NO.: ABN17505 st ISUBNERGENCE: NA I I DOCUNENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1. FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONNENTAL CONDITIONS, I sSPRAY: NA I I 1. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUNENT REFERENCED. I I CRITERIAr EQEDC 1 r REV 1 r NAY 2r 1984 2.NORMAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS tEQUIPNENT NOT SUBJECT TO ~ ~ 2. VENDOR ENVIRONNENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, NAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. ISUBNERGENCE QR SPRAY Il SDDF 0 IEEE-07. 160-5004C 3.OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FROM 32 I I s I 3. EQUIPNENT OPERABILITY TINE DATA SHEET: DAYS TESTED VALUEr TO 1 00 DAYS PLUS I
~ ~ F ILE NO. FSYs-27-7-2 NARGIN, BY ANALYSIS~
I I I I 4. CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-16 sACCEPTABLE TQ NUREG 0588,CAT I s I 5. ASCO INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE I I INSTRUCTION FORM V-5969 AND V-5999 I I ~ I I I I I I I I I I I t NAINT/SURVEILL I I
~ ~
s
REFERENCE:
4,5 ~ I I I ~ I I ~ tQUALIFIED LIFE ~ I
~ I s (YEARS): 40 I ~
I ~ s
REFERENCE:
2,4 I~ I
~ ~ ~ ~ I I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I I I ~ I
NINE NILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUNBER S0-410 SYSTEN CONPQNENT EVALUATION NQRK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 2 QUAL REF II C051NAL REV 0 23-Nar<<85 ac ac a a aa a ac a ca'aa ac 'c a
~ ~ ~
s ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND GUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ~
~ ~ ~
I DOCUNENT REFERENCE s aa aaaa a a a aaaaaa as I PARANETER ~ SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED s s QUAL sNARGINI RENARKS SPECIFIED t QUALIFIED s EGUIP NO.: 2RHSwLV 178 s VALUE
,,acaaaaaaaaa,aacaacaaaaal,aacacacaaaa'aaacaaaa t VALUE I aa aaaaaca ~
s
~
NETHOD I DEMO I ca aaa-aa ---a'ac- '--a-aaa --a-- s NO.: I OP TINE )100 DAYS s SPEC ISYSTEM: C051N RESIDUAL HEAT RENOVAL.
~
t I TEMP (F) s NORNAL I I I 6 HRS 104/89 t I s 194
~
s s 3 1 s s
~
4 2 s AN+DATA I TEST SIN s s s YES NA
'OTE s
s I NOTE 3 s'(QTF 1 NOTE 2 s s ABNORNALs 1.07 194 2 I TEST-SIM NA I s
----- ---- --- ----- ---I s ~ s t 1 s t s TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) ~ I ACCIDENTs 175 I 380 I 1 s 2 s TEST-SIN I YES I LINIT SWITCH stPRESS(PSIG)l t ss s I I NOTE 1 s I I NORMAL s 0 25 'Is)G I ATNOS s 1 ~ 2 s TEST SIN s NA I I s ABNORMAL s 0 2S tsIG ~ ATNQS ~ 1 s 2 I TEST SIN I NA ~
sNANUFACTURER: NANCO ~ I ACCIDENT I 2 8 I 100 s 1 s 2 I TEST SIN s YES I s sRss (/) s s
~ ~ ~ ssspvpc NOTE 1 s ~
INODEL NO.: EA740 I t NORMAL s 50 I 100 1 2 t TEST-SIN I NA SAFETY FUNCTION s ~ ABNORMAL ACCIDENTS
~ 50 100 s 100 STEAM s
I 1 s s 2, 2 I TEST SIN I TEST-SIN I NA NA I s
~
s INDICATING THE POSITION OF I I s s RADIATION: I ' I t 1 t I
' - I s
NOTE 1 ITHE ISOLATION VALVES FOR I s NORN GAMNAI i. 1E6 s I 1 I I NA ISTN CONDENSING NODE OF RHS II ACC GANNA I 3.6E7 I 2.04EG I 1 s 2 I TEST-SIN I YES I sOP. CODE: A NORM BETA s . NA 1 s Is ACC BETA I 1.3E7 I 1 s sl NEUTRON I NA s 1 s NA s s s ISPRAY I NA I NA I NA ~ NA I NA ~ NA IACCURACY ttSUBNERGENCEI NA t NA I NA st NA s NA s NA s s SPEC: NA aaccaaaac aaaaaacacaaacccacaacaca caaaaaaacaaaaaaccaaaaac acacacaacaaaaaaaaacaaacaaa s DENO: NA ~
~ ~ ~
s s ~ s s OZONE NQ.: ABS17S10 s s s s sSUBNERGENCE: NA II DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1.FQR CQNPLETE ENVIRONNENTAL CONDITIONSs I ISPRAY: NA EGUIPNENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUNENT REFERENCED s s I I I 1 CRITERIA, EGEDC-1, REV 1, NAY 2, 1984. '.NORMAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOtslN AS I EGUIPNENT NOT SUBJECT TO ~ s s 2. VENDOR ENVIRONNENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, NAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. sSUBNERGENCE OR SPRAY SDDF 0 IEEE-07. 160-S005A 3.OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FROM 33 I s s s 3. EGUIPNENT OPERABILITY TINE DATA SHEET: DAYS TESTED VALUEs TO 100 DAYS PLUS I s ls FILE NO. FSK-27-7-2 MARGIN, BY ANALYSIS. s s I s 4. CALCULATION NO. 12177-EGS-41 s s IACCEPTABLE TO NUREG OS88,CAT
~ ~
I s ~
~ s ~ s s ~
s s ~ s ~ s NAINT/SURVEILL
~ ~
s ~ I s ~
REFERENCE:
2 s
~
s
~
s s s s ~ s IGUALIFIED LIFE s s
~ ~
(YEARS): 40 s s s
~
s
REFERENCE:
2 ~
~ ~ ~ ~ s ~ ~ ~ =~ ~ s ~ s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s
NINE NILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEN COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 2 OF 2 QUAL REF ¹ C051NAL REV 0 23-Nar-85 ~ mD c Rc e c s cs Daasszx ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION s s s s
~ ~ s DOCUNENT REFERENCE I s
~ R~s @Re R R aac ~ I t PARAMETER s SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED I t QUAL I MARGIN I REMARKS s VALUE I VALUE I SPECIFIED s QUALIFIED I NETHOD I DENO I I a aa Rata a a IEQUIP NO.: 2RHS%LV}7B ~ s ~ s
~ s ~ ~
s ~ s . s a
---s- --- ---I s ~ ~ s ~ s s ISPEC NO.: C051N s sOP.TIME: I 6 HRS a >100 DAYS a 3 s 4 's AN+DATA s YES s NOTE 3 ISYSTEN: RESIDUAL HEAT lsTENP(F)- I I t NOTE}
REMOVAL ~s. NORMAL I 104/8'9 140 I 1 I 2s4 s TEST SIN I NA a NOTE 2
----- ----- '---- '---- '--I ~
s s I ABNQRNAL s 107 I 268 I 1 I 2,4 ~ TEST-SIN I NA s I TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) SOLENOID VALVE I I ssPRESS(PSIG)a I I ACCIDENTI NORMAL I 175
-0.25"WG -- t a
s 346 ATMOS a a I 1 1 s s 2,4 2 s I TEST-SIN TEST-SIN I I YES NA NOTE 1 I al ABNORNALI -0.25"WG I ATNOS I 1 s 2 s TEST-SIN I NA I t tMANUFACTURER: ASCO ~ ACCIDENT ~ 2 8 I 1 10 I 1
' 2 I TEST SIN I YES ~
s s I sRH (/): ~ ' I I NOTE 1 tNODEL NO.: 206-380-3RF sl NORMAL s 50 t 100 I 1 I 2 s TEST-SIN s NA s s s I aa ABNORMALI 50 I 100 I 1 s 2 s TEST-SIN I NA I s I SAFETY FUNCTION: ACCIDENT 100 STEAN I 2 TEST-SIN NA I
- I a1 1
s ISOLATION VALVE FOR I s RADIATION s
' s s
s s a NOTE 1 ISTN CONDENSING NODE OF RHS NORM GAMMAI 1. 1E6 t I I s NA s I I ACC GANNA s 5. }E7 s 2. 0E8 I 1 s 2 a TEST-SIN I YES I I OP. CODE: A al NORM BETA I . NA I 1 s s II ACC BETA I 1 4E7 I 1 s I I YES I ts NEUTRON s NA 1 NA s IISPRAY aACCURACY s SPEC: NA IISUBNERGENCEs s a s a
-- NA = -- --
s NA I NA a NA I
--NA -- I NA ~
s
~~- ~ ~ ~ DENOt NA s ~ ~ ~
s s s s s IZONE NO.t ABS}7510 ~
~ ~ ~
sSUBMERGENCE: NA II DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1.FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS,s ISPRAY! NA I I 1. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONNENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DQCUNENT REFERENCED ~ a a CRITERIA, EQEDC-}, REV 1, NAY 2, 1984. 2.NORMAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS aEQUIPNENT NOT SUBJECT TO a I 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, NAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. sSUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY It SDDF ¹ IEEE-07. 160-5004C 3.OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FROM 32 s t I 3" EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TINE DATA SHEET: DAYS TESTED VALUE, TO 100 DAYS PLUS s s I FILE NO. FSK-27-7-2 MARGIN, BY ANALYSIS. s s I I 4 ~ CALCULATION NO 12177-EQS-16 IACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT I I I 5. ASCO INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE s INSTRUCTION FORM V-5969 AND V-5999 s s s s ~ s s s s ~ s s s ~ I NAINT/SURVE ILL ~
~ ~ ~
I s
REFERENCE:
4,5 s
~
s s s
~
s I QUALIFIED LIFE - s
~
s s s
~
I (YEARS): 40 s
~
s s
REFERENCE:
2s4 ~
~
s
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s ~ s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s ~ s
0 NINE NILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUNBER 50-410 SYSTEM CONPONENT EV4I UATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 2 QUAL REF ¹ C051NAN REV 0 23-Nar-85
~ -- -- c-aa---a-----.--.a aaaa--aaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaa .aaaaa aa- aaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaarraaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaa aa ~ ~
s
~ ~ ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION s s
s s s I DOCUNENT REFERENCE I s aaaaaa aaa si s PARANETER I SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED I s QUAL siNARGINI REMARKS e VALUE I VRLUE ~ SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED s METHOD I DEMO I I EQUIP NO.: 2RHS+PV214 ssa-aaaa aaa-,aaaaaaaa
~ ~ s aa,aa a .aaaaaa'a = aaa a. 'aaa --=a 'a a asaaaaaasa aaa rr I SPEC NO.: C051M ~ I OP TIME' 6 HRS ~ >100 DAYS ~ 3 ~ 4 ~ AN+DATA s YES ~ NOTE 3 s ISYSTEM: RESIDUAL HEAT ~ s TFe IP (Fl \I r ~ s ~
s s s s s
~
e I ~ IOTE I~ r lre'TE s s REMOVAL NORMAL I 104/85 I 194 I 1 I 2 I TEST-SIN ', NA I NOTE 2 I s s ~ ~ RBNORMAL I 92 s 194 ~ 1 ~ 2 s TEST S IM I NA I TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) ~ I ACCIDENT t 175 ~ 380 I 1 s 2 I TEST SIN I YES LIMIT SWITCH IPREBS(PSIG) I I ~ s ~ I I NOTE 1 I s I NORNAL I 0 25" WG I ATI'IOS I 1 ~ 2 i TEST SIN I NA s I I ABNORNALI 0 25" WG t ATMOS ~ 1 t 2 ~ TEST SIN I NA I INRNUFACTURER: NRtiCO ACCIDENT 2 8 100 2 TEST SIN s I t s sRH (/):
~
t I I ' I 1 s I I '
~ YES -'~
NOTE 1 sMODEL NO.: EA740 I s NORMAL I 50 s 100 I 1 s 2 I TEST BIN I NA s
\ ABNORMAL ~ 50 I 100 I 1 I 2 I TEST SIN ~ NA ~
ISAFETY FUNCTION: s t ACCIDENT( 100 I STEAN I 1 2 I TEST-SIN t N4
-I ~
I INDICATING THE POSITION OF I IRADIATION: s I I I I s NOTE 1 ITHE ISOLATION VALVES FOR ss NORN GANMAI 7 'E5 e I ISTN CONDENSING NODE OF RHS I I ACC GANNA s 1 1E8 I 2 04EG I 1 I 2 I TEST SIN I YES IOP. CODE: A NORM BETA I NA e I 1 s s NA I I s s I I 4CC BETA I 1.3E7I s 1
~
s YES I It NEUTRON I NA s 1 e I NA I I slSPRAY I NA I NA I N4 I NA I I'IR I NR I IACCURACY s SPEC: NA IISUBMERGENCEI
,Iaaaaaaaaaaaaar=aaa..
NA aaaaaaaaa. I NA I aaaaaaaaaaaa NA a --I NA I NA aa aaaaaaarraaaaaa I aa a a .aaaar NA aaaaaas DEMO: NA II s II I I ZONE NO.: SC175103 ISUBNERGENCEs NA ts DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1.FGR COt'IPLETE ENVIRGNMFNTAL CONDITIONS, I ISPRAY: NA i. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN BEE THE DOCUNENT REFERENCED. ~ t I CRITERIA, EQEDC-i, REV 1, NAY 2, 1984. 2.NOIENAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS IEQUIPNENT NOT SUBJECT TO 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. sSUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY sil SDDF ¹ IEEE-07. 160-5005A 3.OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FROM 33 s s 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TINE DATA SI.IEFT: DAYS TESTED VALUE, TO 100 DAYS PLUS s F ILE NO. FSK-27-7-2 MARGIN, BY ANALYSIS. I s 4. CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-41 IACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CA T Iss I ~ ~ I
~ ~
s r s s s s i s s s i s s s s I NAINT/SURVE ILL I
~ ~
s s
REFERENCE:
2 ~ s s
~ ~ s ~ ~ s I QUALIFIED LIFE I t I (YEARS): 40 s ~
s
~
s REFERENCE 2 ~
~
s
~ s I i s
s
~
s ~ I s
~ ~
s ~
~ s
NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 2 OF 2 QUAL REF ¹ C051MAM REV 0 23-Mar-85 ccccc cc cc c c c ccc c c c c cc s
~
s s ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ~
~
s
~
t I DOCUMENT REFERENCE
--I s ~ e s s s PARAMETER s SPECIFIED a QUALIFIED s QUAL IMARGINl REMARKS l l VALUE l VALUE l SPECIFIED s QUALIFIED s METHOD a DEMO ~
l EQUIP NO.: 2RHS+PV21A ~
~
s s
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
s
~ ~ c s ISPEC NO.: C051M l IOP. TIME: 6 HRS )100 DAYS 3 l 4 AN+DATA l YES' NOTE 3 s s s ~
lSYSTEM: RESIDUAL HEAT ~ l TEMP (F): l . a l l I s l NOTE 1 s REMOVAL s s NORMAL e 104/85 I 140 s 1 a 2. 4 l TEST-SIM t NA l NOTE 2 s ~ l ABNORMALt 92 268 1 2 4 l TEST SIM NA
'ES s e s s ~
s TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) l I ACCIDENT l 175 l 346 l 1 I 2.4 s TEST-SIM l SOLENOID VALVE l tPRESS(PSIG) ~ ~ l l l l NOTE 1 s tl
~
NORMAL l -0.25"WG l ATMOS l 1 t 2 l TEST-SIM NA s s s Il ABNORMALl -0.25"WG I ATMOS I 1 l 2 l TEST-SIM s l NA lMANUFACTURER: ASCO l I ACCIDENT 2e 8 1 10 l 2 TEST SIM l YES 1 I l s ~ s s ssRH (/): a
' ' l ' ' ~
NOTE lMODEL NO.z 206-380-3RF I I NORMAL l 50 ~ 100 I 1 l 2 s TEST SIM s NA ~ s s ABNORMAL as 50 l 100 l 1 l 2 I TEST-SIM I NA I s SAFETY FUNCTION: I t ACCIDENT ~ 100 s STEAM ~ 1 I 2 I TEST SIM I NA s ISOLATION VALVE FOR ~ l RADIATION I a l I NOTE 1 Il
~ ~ s sSTM CONDENSING MODE OF RHS NORM GAMMAs 7.7E5 I l l 1 a s NA I s
l s ACC GAMMA ~ 1 1EG ~ 2 OE8
~ I 1 l 2 l TEST SIM YES i l OP. CODE: A It NORM BETA l . NA 1 I s
l NA tl s s s ACC BETA l 1.3E7 s l YES II e s NEUTRON s NA s l 1 I ~ s NA ~ l (SPRAY l NA NA e l I NA I NA l NA l NA l sACCURACY lSUBMERGENCEI NA NA NA
~ I s l NA l NA NA SPEC: NA s ~ cc c cc ~ ~
c c ccc DEMO: NA ~
~ ~ ~ ~ s s s sZONE NO.: SC175103 ~ ~
a s s ISUBMERGENCE: NA sl DOCUMENT REFERENCE NOTES: 1 ~ FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONSsl lSPRAY: NA ~ l 1 EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED ~ s I I CRITERIA s EQEDC I r REV 1 s MAY 2 s 1984 ~ 2.NORMAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS ! (EQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO l I 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, MAX DESiGN/AVERAGE lSUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY Il SDDF ¹ IEEE-07. 160-5004C 3.OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FROM 32 s s s s a 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TIME DATA SHEET: DAYS TESTED VALUE, TO 100 DAYS PLUS F ILE NO. FSK-27-7-2 s s I s MARGIN, BY ANALYSIS. s l 4 ~ CALCULATION NO ~ 12177-EQS-ib sACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CA T I a I S. ASCO INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE s t INSTRUCTION FORM V-5969 AND V-5999
~ s s s s s
s ~ ~
~ ~ s s
s s l MAINT/SURVEILL ~ s s ~
~
s s s s
REFERENCE:
4,5 s s s s s s s LIFE s s l QUALIFIED ~
~
s s s (YEARS): 40 ~ s
~ ~
s
REFERENCE:
2,4 at s
~ s s ~ ~ ~ ~
s s
~ ~ ~ s s s
0 NINE NIL POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEN COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 QUAL REF tt C051NAN REV 0 OF 2 23-Nar-85 aaaaaaaraaaaaaraaaaaraa rrraaaarraraaaaaaaaraaaaaraaaaraaraaaaaaar araaara aa s s
~ ~ 'NVIRONNENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ~
s s
~
DOCUNENT REFERENCE I s a I PARANETER I SPECIFIED QUALIFIED s s I I s QUAL INARGINI RENARKS I t I VALUE I VALUE SPECIFIED QUALIFIED I EQUIP NO.: 2RHS+PV21B s I I
~
r r r s s s i I s i a a r
~
arra a I a METHOD aar s DENO I SPEC NO.: C051N TINE: s s sOP. s 6 HRS I )100 DAYS 3 I 4 AN+DATA YES NOTE 3 ITENP (F) ' s is t I ISYSTEN: RESIDUAL HEAT s I s RENOVAL s s I ~ s NOTE 1 s NORNAL s 104/85 I 194 i 1 I 2 TEST SIM I NA NOTE 2 s s s ABNORMALi 92 ' 194 s s s 2 I TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) ACCIDENTS 175 380
~ 1 s 2'
I TEST SIN TEST SIM s NA I i1 s s s I 1 YES LINIT SWITCH tsPRESS(PSIG)s s s
~
s I
~
t
~
s s'OTE1
~ 'e LJ ~ r s ts NORNAL I -0.25"WG I ATNOS I 1 s 2 I TEST-SIM I NA I s
s s t ABNORMALi -0. 25" WG I ATNOS l s 2 I TEST-S IM t NA I IMANUFACTURER: NANCO ACCIDENT( 2 8 100 2
~ s t s 1 s I TEST SIN s YES r
s s s s s s
~ ~ s L e p\ M s ~ s ~
INODEL NO.: EA740 NORMAL I 50 100 2
~
s I s 1 ~ ~ TEST SIN ~ NA I s ABNORMALI 50 I 100 t 1 I 2 ~ TEST SIN ~ NA ~ sSAFETY FUNCTION: I I ACCIDENT ~ 100 STEAN I 2 TEST SIM s 1 ~ I ~ NA ~ I INDICATING THE POSITION OF I IRRDIATION t I I I ~ ~ ~ NOTE 1 ITHE ISOLATION VALVES FOR ISTM CONDENSING MODE OF RHS ss NORM GANNAs 7.7E5 I s 1 I I NA I' I ACC GANMA s 3 7E7 s 2 04E8 I 1 s 2 I TEST SIN I YES s IOP. CODE: R ls NORM BETA I NA I 1 s s ACC BETA I 1 'E7 s 1 I I YES s sl NEUTRON e NA 1 s NA s IISPRAY NA NA NA NA sACCURACY sSUBNERGENCEI I NA I I NA I I NA s s NA I I NA NA I I NA NA
--arar ~
SPEC: NA arr ra ~ DENO: NA s s
~ ~
s ~ ~ s ~ s s s sZONE NO.: SC175111 ~ s
~ ~
ISUBNERGENCE: NA II DOCUNENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1.FOR CONPLETE ENVIRONNENTAL CONDITIONS, I ISPRAY: NA I s 1. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONNENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUNENT REFERFNCED. I I CRITERIA~ EQEDC 1 s REV 1 s NAY 2s 1984 ~ 2.NORNAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS IEQUIPNENT NOT SUBJECT TO I I 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, MAX DESIGN/AVERRGE. sSUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY SDDF tt I EEE-07. 160-5005A 3.OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FRON 33 s s EQUIPNENT OPERABILITY TINE DATA SHEET: DAYS TESTED VALUE, TO 100 DAYS PLUS FILE NO. FSK-27-7-2 MARGIN~ BY ANALYSIS. I I 4 ~ CALCULRTION NO. 12177-EQS-41 sACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT s s s s ~ s s s s s s ~ s ~ s s s s s s s s NA I NT/SURVE ILL s
~
s s s
REFERENCE:
2 s s s s s ~ s ~ sQUALIFIED LIFE ~
~ ~
s (YEARS): 40 ~
~
s s
REFERENCE:
2 iI s s ~ s ~ le
~ ~
s s
NINE NILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUNBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 2 OF 2 QUAL REF ¹ C051NAN REV 0 23-Nar-85 RsssRR cs RcR Rs Rs sa s s s K s s s s Rs
~ ~
1
~ ENVIRONNENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPNENT DESCRIPTION 1 1 ~
1 I I I DOCUMENT REFERENCE I s s
~ PARAMETER I SPECIFIED ~ QUALIFIED I QUAL aiNARGINs RENARKS a -a' 1
SPECIFIED VALUE
-+as=-a'--- --s=
QUALIFIED s=-aa'e=s=- VALUE
-I+a-as=- a-a's=a= -- 's=-a -------
1 I I I I NETHOD 1 DENO I 1 I EQUIP NO.: 2RHS+PV21B ~ ~ s SPEC NO.". C051N I I OP TINE ~ 6 HRS I >100 DAYS I 3 i 4 I AN+DATA ~ YES ~ NOTE 3 ISYSTEN: RESIDUAL HEAT s I TENP (F) I ~ I 1 I 1 ~ NOTE 1 1 RENOVAL a I NORNAL I 104/85 I 140 I 1 I 2,4 I TEST-SIM s NA I NOTE 2 1 I I ABNORMALI 92 I 268 1 1 s 2r 4 ~ TEST SIN ~ NA s TYPE! (DESCRIPTION) ACCIDENT 1 175 I 346 a 1 I 2,4 e TEST-SIN I YES I SOLENOID VALVE I IPRESS(PSIG) I I I I I I I NOTE 1
~ 1 NORNAL 1 0 25"WG I + ATNOS I 1 I 2 I TEST SIN I NA ~
Is 0 25" WG 1 ABNQRNALI s ATMOS s 1 I 2 s TEST SIN ~ NA ~ INANUFACTURER: ASCO I ~ ACCIDENTs 2 8 ~ 1 10 ~ 1 i 2 I TEST SIN YES I 1 1 1 ~ RH (/I 1
~ ~ ' 1 1
s
~ ~ ~ asserts e'O'EJ 1 a s
e,
<<MODEL NO.: 206-380-3RF ~ ~ NORMAL I 50 ~ 100 s 1 s 2 I TEST SIN 1 NA ~ ~
1 1
~ ~ ABNQRNAL s 50 ~ 100 1 1 I 2 I TEST SIN I NA ISAFETY FUNCTION: I ACCIDENT 100 I STEAN 2 TEST-SIM 1 s a 1 I 1 s NA I ISOLATION VALVE FOR I I RADIATION' s I I I I I NOTE 1 ISTN CONDENSING NODE OF RHS I NORM GANNA I 7 ~ 7E5 I ~ ~ 1 ~ NA i' I ACC GANNA I 3 7E7 I 2 OEG I 1 I 2 I TEST SIN i YES I IOP. CODE: A ss NORN BETA I ~ NA I s 1
ACC BETA I 1.3E7 I 1 1 I I YES i's .1 NEUTRON I NA I 1 NA s 1 slSPRAY NA NA IACCURACY 1 I I NA I NA I NA s NA I IISUBMERGENCEI NA ~ NA I NA 1 NA I NA I NA s SPEC: NA 1 1 i DEMO: NA 1 1 1
~
1 ~ ~ 1 1 ~ I ZONE NO.: SC175111 ~
~ ~ ~
ISUBMERGENCE: NA ss DOCUNENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1.FOR CONPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS,a ISPRAY: NA 1 EQU I PNENT QUALIFICATION ENV I RONNENTAL DESIGN
~ ~ ~ . SEE THE DOCUNENT REFERENCED.
I I CRITERIA r EQEDC 1 1 REV I r NAY 2 r 1984 ~ 2.NORNAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS IEQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO a a 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, NAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. ISUBNERGENCE OR SPRAY I I SDDF ¹ I EEE-07. 1*0-5004C 3.OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FRON 32 I 1 I I 3. EQUIPNENT OPERABILITY TINE DATA SHEET: DAYS TESTED VALUE, TO 100 DAYS PLUS 1 1 1 I I, F ILE NO. FSK-27-7-2 MARGIN, BY ANALYSIS. 1 1 I 4~ CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-16
~ ACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT I 1 I 5. ASCO INSTALLATION AND NAINTENANCE I I INSTRUCTION FORM V-5969 AND V-5999 1 ~ ~ ~ ~
1 1 1 1
~ 1 1 1 1 ~ 1 1 ~ 1 I NA INT/SURVEILL 1 ~
1 1 I
REFERENCE:
4,5 1
~ ~ ~
1 1 1
~ ~
IQUALIFIED LIFE 1 1
~
1 I (YEARS): 3. 0 ~ 1 ~ 1 I
REFERENCE:
2,4 1 1
~
1
~ 1 ~ 1 ~ 1 ~ 1 1 ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ 1
NINE NILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUNBER 50-410 SYSTEN COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1
¹ REV 0 19-Nar-85 QUAL REF C051NAO rr r rrr r rr r r r rr r rr r rrrrrrr rrr r r rr rr I ~
I ~ ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION I ~ EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION I I I I I I I DOCUNENT REFERENCE I I
~ I s
~ I r ~ I
~ I PARAMETER l SPECIFIED l QUALIFIED QUAL INARGINI RENARKS SPECIFIED QUALIFIED DENO l rrrrrrrrrrr'rrrrrrrrrrr'rrrrrrrrrr 'rrrrrrrr'rrrrrrrrrrr rrrrrrrrrr I I I VALUE I VALUE l l I NETHOD I l EQUIP NO.: 2CSH+HCV133 ~
I I I ~
~
I r I I a SPEC NO.: CO51N ~
~ ~ ~ OP TINE' 12 HRS l >100 DAYS l 3 i 4 l AN+DATA I YES l NOTE 3 I SYSTEN: HIGH PRESSURE ~
I I TENP (F) I I
' I l ~ l NOTE 1 104/93 ' NOTE '2
~ CORE SPRAY NORMAL I 194 I 1 I 2 ~ TEST SIN s NA ~
~ ~
I I ABNORMALl 106 l 194 I 1 l . 2 l TEST-SIN I NA I ACCIDENT 200 380 i 2 I TEST SIN YES I TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) LINIT SWITCH ~ I ~
~
PRESS(PSIG) '
~ ---- ~
l --- I 1 I --- l ----- ~
' - -I~
NOTE I I I I NORNAL s 0 2S WG l ATNOS I 1 s 2 I TEST SIN I NA i I I ~ I ~ ABNORNALl -0.25"WG I ATNQS s 1 s 2 l TEST-SIN l NA INANUFACTURER: NANCO le ACCIDENT I 2~8 l 100 I 1 ~ 2 - l TEST SIN I YES I ~ I
~ ~ RH (/) . I ~ ~
I I I NOTE 1 lNQDEL NO.s EA740 ~
~ ~ ~ NORNAL ~ 50 I 100 ~ 1 l 2 l TEST SIN s NA ~
I ~
~ ~ ~ ABNORNALI SO I 100 I 1 I 2 ~ TEST SIN ~ NA ~
I SAFETY FUNCTION: ~
~ ~ ~ ACCIDENT ~ 100 I STEAN l 1 ~ 2 l TEST SIN I NA l sCORE SPRAY TEST BYPASS l I RADIATION l I l l . ~ ~ l NOTE 1 I VALVE POSITION INDICATOR ~ ~ ~ ~ NORM GANNAI 2E6 l l NA I ~
I I
~ ACC GAMMA l 3.2E7 I 2.04EB l 1 I 2 s TEST-SIN l YES ~ OP. CODE: A ~ ~ ~
I NORN BETA I . NA l ~ 1
~
I I NA I I I I ACC BETA s 1 'E7 I I YES l I I I I I NEUTRON s NA I
~
1
~
NA a I I I SPRAY
~
NA NA NA NA rrNA lACCURACY SUBNERGENCEI NA I l I r rrrr
~ ~
I ~ I I ~ SPEC: NA I I I ~ r I ~ I DEMO: NA ~ ~ I ~ ~ I I I
~ I I ZONE NO.: SC215122 ~ I ISUBNERGENCE: NA I I I ~ DOCUNENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1.FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, I ISPRAY: NA ll i. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICRTION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. I I I II ~I CRITERIAs EQEDC-1, REV 1, NAY 2, 1984. 2.NORMAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN RS I I lEQUIPNENT NOT SUBJECT TO 2. VENDOR ENVIRONNENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. I lSUBNERGENCE OR SPRAY I I I I SDDF ¹ IEEE-07. 160-5005A 3.OPERABILITY PERIOD EXTENDED FROM 33 I I
~ I 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TINE DATA SHEET: DAYS TESTED VALUE, TO 100 DAYS PLUS I
I FILE NO. 27-4 NARGIN, BY ANALYSIS. I I le 4. CALCULRTION NO. IRCCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT Il s
~
I l l
~ I I ~ ~ I ~ ~
I ~ ~ I ~ ~ l NAINT/SURVEILL ~ ~ I I I
REFERENCE:
2 ~
' ~ ~
I QUALIFIED LIFE
~ ~ ~
s I I (YEARS): 40 ~ I
~ ~
REFERENCE:
2 ll I ~ I ~
~ I ~ ~
I I
~ I ~ I ~ I
NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 0 OF 1
¹ 20-Mar-85 QUAL REF C071AAA REV 0 aaaa aa sl a aa aa a a -- = aaaaa -=- aaaa aaaaaaada aaaaaaaaa aaaaa aaa ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ~ ~ I DOCUMENT REFERENCE I s ~ PARAMETER I SPECIFIED l QUALIFIED QUAL s MARGIN l REMARKS VALUE VALUE SPECIFIED QUALIFIED l METHOD l DEMO I IEQUIP NO.: 2HVRssTIS16A >>
I ~
--- aaaaa s a-a s iaa e
I I s s
~
l TEST-S I M I I l YES
~
I ISPEC NO.: C071A OP TIME 100 DAYS I >100 DAYS 3 2 I s lSYSTEM:
~ ~
REACTOR BUILDINGTEMP (F) s
' ' - s s ~ ~ I I NOTE 1 I VENTILATION I NORMAL l 104/88 l 120 s 1 I 2 TEST-8 I M s NA NOTE 2 ABNORMALl 88 s 120 ~ 1 ~ 2 . l NA I NA s 255 2 TEST-SIM YES l TYPE: (DESCRIPTION)
TEMPERATURE SWITCH ACCIDENT l
'PRESS(PSIG) l ,
NA l I I " 1 I I l
~
I
~ I I NOTE 1 I sie NORMAL' I-0.25"WG l ATMOS 1 l 2 TEST-SI M ~ NA I I
I es ABNORMALs -0.25"WG I ATMOS s NA I NA I 2 TEST-S I M YES i1 siMANUFACTURER: UNITED ELECTRIC se ACCIDENTs NA l 18 l 1 I I I I I /s ~ I I NOTE 1 IMODEL NO.: 802P-5AS ss NORMAL I 50 59 I 1 2 TEST-8 I M I NA ~ I I eis iABNORMALl 50 I 59 e I 2 NA I NA I lSAFETY FUNCTION: s s ACCIDENT l NA I 100 ~ 1 s 2 ~ TEST-S I M I NA ~ I START UNIT COOLER UPON I
~
NOTE 1
'E3 'RADIATION's REACHING HIGH TEMPERATURE NORM GAMMAI 1 I 1 I NA I ACC GAMMA I 2.2E4 I 1E7 I 1 I 2 s TEST-SI M s YES IOP. CODE: A ls NORM BETA s NA I 1 I s NA I sl ACC BETA ~ NA I 1 s NA ~
I el NEUTRON l NA 1 s NA I I ~ l SPRAY ~ NA l NA ~ NA I NA s NA NA IACCURACY slSUBMERGENCEI NA I NA I NA s NA NA s NA I
~ ~
SPEC: NA ~ I
~ ~
DEMO: NA ~ I I ~ I ~ lZONE NO.: ABS24036 ~
~ ~ ~
DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1 ~ FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, I lSUBMERGENCE: NA I ~ 1 ~ EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. ISPRAY: NA CRITERIA s EQEDC-1 I REV 1 s MAY 2, 1984 ~ 2. NOR MAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS I I ~ 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE
~ EQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO SDDF ¹ IEEE-07. 144-5000A ISUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY. s l 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TIME DATA SHEETs I
I l I FILE NO. 22-1-C3
~ DOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY> ~ ~ ~ ~
IACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT I ~
~ ~ ~ ,I I ~
I I
~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~
I I I I ~ I MA I NT/SURVE ILL ~
~ ~
I I . I
REFERENCE:
NA I
~ ~ ~ I ~ I I ~
lQUALIFIED LIFE I I (YEARS): 10 ~
~ ~ ~
I
REFERENCE:
2 ~
~ I I ~ ~ ~
I ~ I I
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I I I
NINE MILE POINT - UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF ¹ C071A4B REV 0 17-Mar-85
~ ~
a
~ ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ~ ~ ~ ~
a I DOCUMENT REFERENCE I rrrrrrrrrrzerrr SPECIFIED QUALIFIED QUAL MARGIN REMARKS r---r-r '-r---- -- ' ' -rr-- ' -r 'r-rr-=====- ' ~
~ PARAMETER ~ I s s s s a
I VALUE s VALUE I SPECIFIED s QUALIFIED s METHOD s DEMO e EQUIP NO.: 2HVRssT I 8ibB ~ ~ ~ a a a
~
I I SPEC NO.: C071A I OP. TIME: I 100 DAYS I )100 DAYS s 3 I 2 I TEST-SIM I YES eSYSTEM: REACTOR BUILDINGa 'EMP (F) o ~
~ ~ ~ a a
a a NOTE 1 VENTILATION I NORMAL ~ 104/88 s 120 ~ 1 I 2 ~ TEST SIM ~ NA NOTE 2 a ABNORMALs 88 s 120 I 1 s 2 s NA I NA 255 2 TEST SIM ' I YES s TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) TEMPERATURE SWITCH I ACCIDENT
'PRESS (PSIG) ' ~ NA - I ' - ~
1 I I I - - s NOTE 1 s NORMAL I -0. 25" WG I ATMOS I 1 I 2 I TEST-SI M I NA a ABNORMALa -0.25"WG ATMOS'a 1 s 2 I N4 I NA s 2' a s sl s MANUFACTURER: UNITED ELECTRIC s ACCIDENTs NA I 18 I 1 s TEST SIM ~ YES a
/a/'S a a
a a a a a a a a a a a NOTE 1 IMODEL NO.: 802P-5AS: s NORMAL I 50 I 59 s 1 s 2 I TEST-SIM s NA a a I - ABNORMALe 50 ~ 59 ~ ' ~ 2 I NA I NA 100 2 TEST SIM NA I SAFETY FUNCTION: START UNIT COOLER UPON s s ACCIDENT RADIATION: s a NA s I s s 1 I s I
~
I - a NOTE 1 REACHING HIGH TEMPERATURE ~ NORM GAMMAI 1 8E3 a 1 a a I NA I a s ACC GAMMA s 2 2E4 ~ 1E7 ~ 1 ~ 2 I TEST SIM I YES I OP. CODE: A e NORM BETA ~ NA a 1 a I NA s a a I ACC BETA I NA 1 a a I NA, I a I NEUTRON I NA 1 IACCURACY SPEC: NA
~ SPRAY ISUBMERGENCEI NA s NA s 'A s NA s NA I NA s DEMO: NA a
aZONE NO.: ABS2403b a sSUBMERGENCE: NA DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1 ~ FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENT4L CONDITIONS, s sSPRAY: NA ~ l. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. CRITERIA, EQEDC-is REV is M4Y 2s 1984 ~ 2.NORMAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS IEQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO I 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QU4LIFICATION REPORTs - M4X DESIGN/AVERAGE ISUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY. SDDF ¹ IEEE-07. 144-5000A a I 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TIME DATA SHEET: FILE NO. 22-1-C3 IDOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: sACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT a ~ a a ~ a a a a a a MAINT/SURVEILL a
REFERENCE:
NA a a I QUALIFIED LIFE a a a a a a (YEARS): 10 ~
~
a a REFERENCEi 2 ~
~
a a a ~ a ~ a ~
~ ~ ~ ~
a ~ a a a ~
NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE OF QUAL REF ¹ C071AAC REV 0 17-Mar-85
~ ~ ~
I ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ~ I
~ ~
I DOCUMENT REFERENCE
~ ~ PARAMETER ~ SPECIFIED ~ QUALIFIED i QUAL IMARGINl REMARKS s VALUE l VALUE I SPECIFIED l QUALIFIED s METHOD I DEMO I I I I I EQUIP NO.: 2HVR+T IS194 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
s I ~ ~ I I I ~ ~ ISPEC NO.: C071A ~ s OP TIME s 100 DAYS ~ >100 DAYS I 3 l 2 TEST-S I M I YES I I REACTOR BUILDING'TEMP (F) I CSYSTEM: NOTE 1 I VENTILATION NORMAL I 104/89 s 120 I 1 l 2 s TEST-SI M I NA l NOTE 2 ABNORMALI 89 I 120 I 1 l 2 I N4 s NA I l TYPEs (DESCRIPTION) l ~ ACCIDENTs NA I 255 ~ 1 ~ 2 s TEST-SIM l YES s I TEMPERATURE SWITCH 'PRESS(PSIG) I NOTE 1 I
'ORMAL -0 25" WG I ATMOS a 1 l 2 s l NA ABNORMALI -0.25" WG I ATMOS I 1 I 2 s NA l I I lMANUFACTURER: UNITED ELECTRIC ACCIDENTS NA I 18 1 2 ~ YES s I /'a I I NOTE 1 NO.: 802P-SAS 50 59 2,
2 IMODEL el NORMAL I I 1 I I NA l I I ss ABNORMALl 50 s 59 1 2 I NA ISAFETY FUNCTION: ~ s ACCIDENT ~ NA ~ 100 l 1 I ~ s NA l iSTART s UNIT COOLER UPON R4DIATION- ' ~ e NOTE 1 REACHING HIGH TEMPERATURE as NORM GAMMAI 1.8E3 s I 1 s l NA I I I s ~ ACC GAMMA l 2. 2E4 s iE7 ~ 1 s 2 TEST-8 I M ~ YES s IOP. CODE: A ~ l NORM BETA l NA I I 1 I NA l I I le ACC BETA I NA 1 I NA I l s NEUTRON s NA 1 s NA I NA NA N4 I ~ ISPRAY ~ NA a NA s l NA s I I IACCURACY s ~ SUBMERGENCEI NA l NA ~ NA l NA I NA l NA I SPEC: NA ~ I
~ ~
I DEMOs NA ~
~ ~ ~ I ~ I IZONE NO.: ABN24033 I I ~ ~
lSUBMERGENCE: NA DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1.FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, l lSPRAY: NA l I 1. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED'AL I I CRITERIA, EQEDC-i, REV 1, MAY 2, 1984 ~ 2. NOR TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS lEQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO I s 2 VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT a MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. lSUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY. SDDF ¹ I EEE-07 144-SOOOA
~
I I s s 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TIME DATA SHEET: I FILE NO. 22-1-C3 I DOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: ~
~
I I sACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,C4T ~
~ ~
I I I I I ~ I I I I I I
~ I I ~ I ~ ~
I I MA INT/SURVE ILL ~ I I
~ I ~
REFERENCE:
NA
~ I I ~ I s QUALIFIED LIFE ~ ~ ~ ~
(YEARS): 10
REFERENCE:
2
~ ~ ~ I I ~
I ~ I I I ~
~ ~ ~ ~
NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF ¹ C071AAD REV 0 17-Mar-85
~ ~
e e ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ~
~ ~
e
~ DOCUMENT REFERENCE s PARAMETER I SPECIFIED s QUALIFIED I e QUAL s MARGIN a REMARKS VALUE s VALUE e SPECIFIED s QUALIFIED I METHOD I DEMO I ~ e IEQUIP NO.: 2HVR+TIS19B e e e e e e e e e e e ~
I SPEC NO.: C071A s OP. TIME: I 100 DAYS I >100 DAYS I 3 s 2 e TEST-S IM s YES s eSYSTEM: REACTOR BUILDING 'EMP (F)
~ NOTE 1 VENTILATION NORMAL I 104/89 I 120 e 1 s 2 e TEST-SIM I NA e NOTE 2 TYPES'DESCRIPTION) s ABNORMALs 89 s 120 ~ 1 . ~ 2 ~ NA NA s I I ACCIDENTs NA s 255 s 1 a 2 ~ TEST-S IM YES I e TEMPERATURE SWITCH IPRESS(PSIG) e ~ ~ NOTE 1 e I 'ORMAL -0.25" WG I ATMOS I 1 I 2 TEST-SIM I NA s e
I ABNORMALI -0.25" WG s ATMOS I - 1 s 2 s NA I NA I I MANUFACTURER: UNITED ELECTRIC ACCIDENT s NA I 18 a 1 e 2 e TEST-S IM e YES e e e e NOTE 1. 50 59 2 TEST-S I M NA IMODEL NO.: 802P-5AS ~ s NORMAL ABNORMALI s 50 s s 59 s I 1 1 s s 2 s sNA s s I NA a I I SAFETY FUNCTION: ACCIDENT ~ NA ~ 100 ~ 1 s 2 s TEST-SIM NA I ~ START UNIT COOLER UPON 'ADIATION. I ~ ~ e e e e NOTE 1 REACHING HIGH TEMPERATURE I NORM GAMMAI 1.8E3 s 1 s e e NA s ACC GAMMA s 2.2E4 I 1E7 s 1 s 2 s TEST-SIM s YES s e OP, CODE: A s NORM BETA s NA ~ e 1 NA I INACCURACY ACC BETA s NA e 1
~
NA e I NEUTRON I NA s I 1 e e NA I e ISPRAY I NA s NA I NA a NA NA s NA a ISUBMERGENCEs NA a NA I NA s NA NA NA s SPEC: NA e e DEMO: NA e e sZONE NO.: ABN24033 eSUBMERGENCE: NA DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1 ~ FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS,
~ SPRAY: NA s 1. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED.
CRITERIA, EQEDC-l, REV 1, MAY 2, 1984. 2.NORMAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS EQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE.
¹ ~
eSUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY. SDDF IEEE-07. 144-SOOOA e 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TIME DATA SHEET: FILE NO- 22-1-C3
~ DOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: e e
e
~ ~ ACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT e e e ~ ~
e e e ~ e e ~ e s MAINT/SURVEILL- ~
~ ~ ~
REFERENCE:
NA ~
~ ~
e e ~ ~ e I QUALIFIED LIFE e
~
e
~
e e
~ (YEARS) 10 ~
e
~ ~
I
REFERENCE:
2 e e
~
e
~ ~
e ~
~ e e e ~ ~
e e e e e e
NINE MILE POINT , UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF ¹ C071AAE REV 0 20-Mar-85 s
~ ~ ~ ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ~ ~
s s s
~ DOCUMENT REFERENCE s s s PARAMETER s SPECIFIED s QUALIFIED s QUAL ~ MARGIN REMARKS s
VALUE s VALUE s SPECIFIED s QUALIFIED METHOD DEMO a
~ a 2HVR+T 1 8224 ~ a s sEQUIP NO.: ~ ~ s ~ s s s s ~ ~ ~
lSPEC NO.: C071A s s OP. TIME: s 100 DAYS s )100 DAYS e 3 s 2 s TEST-S IM YES REACTOR BUILDING'TEMP (F) s s NOTE 1 ISYSTEM: s VENTILATION ss NORMAL s 104/85 s 120 s TEST-SIM NA NOTE 2 s a sl ABNORMALs 95 s 120 l 1 s 2 TEST-SIM NA I TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) ss ACCIDENTS 175 s 255 - s 1 s TEST-SIM YES
'PRESS(PSIG) s NOTE 1 TEMPERATURE SNITCH s a
s NORM4L
's s -0.25" WG s ATMOS s 1 2 TEST-SIM NA se ABNORMALs -0.25" WG l ATMOS s 1 l 2 l TEST-SIM NA sMANUFACTURER: UNITED ELECTRIC l s ACCIDENTl 2 8 s 18 ~ 1 s 2 s TEST-SIM YES s I /'i e s ~ s s s
s s NOTE 1 TEST-S I M s sMODEL NO.: 802P-5AS ss NORMAL s 50 59 1 s 2 s NA ls ABNORMALl 50 s 59 l
~
2 ~ TEST-S IM. s NA sSAFETY FUNCTION: l I ACCIDENTs 100 s 100 l 1 TEST-S I M s NA
RADIATION NOTE 1 START UNIT COOLER UPON REACHING HIGH TEMPERATURE ll NORM GAMMAs 2 6E5 ~ s 4 4
s 2 TEST-SIM NA YES s ~ ACC GAMMA l 3 6E6 ~ 1E7 s l s s OP. CODE: A ls NORM BETA s NA s 1 NA s s s s ACC BETA s 6. 1E6 ~ s I YES s ls NEUTRON l NA s s 1 NA s
' N4 NA llSPR4Y l NA NA NA s slSUBMERGENCEs NA NA l NA NA NA eACCURACY s s ~ s SPEC: NA ~ s ~ a DEMO: NA ~ s s s s s s l ZONE NO.: ABN17503 s ~
s s sSUBMERGENCE: NA DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1.FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, ISPRAY: NA s s i. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN BEE THE DOCUMENT 2.NORM REFERENCED'L TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS s CRITERIA, EQEDC-1, REV 1, MAY 2, 1984 ~ ll s EQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE.
¹ s
ISUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY. I ~ SDDF IEEE-07. 144-SOOOA s s s s 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TIME DAT4 SHEET: l s FILE NO. 22-1-C3 s DOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: l I 4. CALCULATION NO. 12177-PR (C) 0 sACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT I s s s s s s s s s s s
~ s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
s ~ l MAINT/BURVEILL-s a s s
~ ~
REFERENCE:
NA s ~ s ~ s a
~ ~
sQUALIFIEP LIFE s s
~
s s (YEARS): 10 ~
~ ~
s
REFERENCE:
2 s ~
~ ~
s ~ s ~ s ~ s s a a s ~ s s s s
NINE NILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUNBER SO-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF QUAL REF II C071AAF REV 0 17-Mar-85
~ ~ ~ ~ ENVIRONNENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPNENT DESCRIPTION ~
a a a I I I I I DOCUNENT REFERENCE a a I a PARANETER s SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED ~ QUAL s MARGIN a REMARKS I VALUE VALUE I SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED METHOD I DEMO ~ a s a a a ~ a EQUIP NO.: 2HVR+TI 822B a ~ a ~ ~ ~ a a a a a ~ a ~ a s sSPEC NO.: C071A I OP. TINE: s e 100 DAYS s >100 DAYS e 3 s 2 I TEST-S I M s YES ISYSTEN: REACTOR BUILDINGTEMP (F) ' s a a a
~ NOTE 1 VENTILATION TEST-S I M s NA NOTE 2 ABNORMALI 95 e 120 e 1 I 2 TEST-S IN s NA s TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) II ACCIDENTe 17S e 255 . e 1 s 2 TEST-5 I M s YES e TEMPERATURE SWITCH a I PRESS (PSIG) ' ' ' ' ~ a NOTE 1 s
a ~ s NORNAL ~ 0 25 WG I ATMOS ~ 1 e 2 TEST-SI M I NA ABNORNALs -0.25" WG I ATNOS I 1 s 2 s TEST-SIN a NA UNITED ELECTRIC ACCIDENT I 2. 8 18 2 TEST-SIN YES NANUFACTURER sl - I I s s a 1 a ~ e ~ a ( lb ~ ~ a a I a a NOTE 1 a IMODEL NO.) 802P-5AS I I NORNAL s 50 I 59 ~ 1 s 2 TEST-SIN e NA e a I ABNORNAL a 50 I 59 ~ 1 s 2 TEST-SIN I NA ~ a sSAFETY FUNCTION! ACCIDENT e 100 I 100 s 1 I 2 TEST-SIN I NA
' NOTE a START UNIT COOLER UPON RADIATION 1 'A s
I REACHING HIGH TENPERATURE s e NORN GANNA I 2. 6E5 s NA e a a sl ACC GANNA s 3.6E6 s 1E7 TEST-SIN I YES a IOP. CODE: A ~ s NORM BETA I 1 NA s INACCURACY a ss
~ ~
esSPRAY ACC BETA NEUTRON IISUBMERGENCEI I 6.'1E6 NA NA NA s s I NA NA I I I 1 NA NA
~
s
'A NA NA NA s
s I sl YES NA NA NA I
~
a SPEC: NA a
~ ~
a DENO: NA ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
a a I ZONE NO. s ABN17503 ~ a a a sSUBNERGENCE: NA DOCUNENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1.FOR CONPLETE ENVIRONNENTAL CONDITIONS, e ISPRAY: NA I e 1. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONNENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. a a CRITERIA, EQEDC-1, REV 1, MAY 2, 1984. 2. NOR NAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS aEQUIPNENT NOT SUBJECT TO s s 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, NAX DESIGN/AVERAGE.
~ SUBNERGENCE OR SPRAY SDDF 5 IEEE-07. 144-5000A a s 3. EQUIPNENT OPERABILITY TIME DATA SHEET:
FILE NO. 22-1-C3
~ DOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: s I 4 ~ CALCULATION NO. 12177-PR (C) 0 sACCEPTABLE TO NUREG OSSS,CAT I ~ ~ ~ ~
a a a
~ a a ~
a ~ ~ a a a a a a a a a s NAINT/SURVEILL a a
~ ~ ~ =
REFERENCE:
NA a a
~
a a a ~ a sQUALIFIED LIFE a ~ a a a a a (YEARS): 10 ~ a ~ a
REFERENCE:
2 ~
~ ~ ~ ~ a a a a a a ~
a ~ a ~ a ~ a a
NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF ¹ C071AAG REV 0 20-Mar-85 ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION e e e DOCUMENT REFERENCE PARAMETER SPECIFIED l QUALIFIED QUAL sMARGINs REMARKS s s s VALUE 'ALUE SPECIFIED e s s QUALIFIED a"s l t tETHOD t DEMO s s EQUIP NO ~ . 2HVR+TIS23A e e e ~ s
~ ~
e ~ s e e SPEC NO-: C071A s OP. TIME: e 100 DAYS s >100 DAYS e 3 s 2 s TEST-SIM l YES CSYSTEM: REACTOR BUILDINGs Tc'MPC'MC I L C'MD F )l ~ e
~ ~ ~ NOTE 1 VENTILATION s NORMAL s 104/85 s 120 l 1 e 2 s TEST-S I M a NA NOTE 2 e s ABNORMALs 99 s 120 l I l 2 s TEST-SIM ~ NA s TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) s ACCIDENT s 175 s 255 s 1 e 2 s TEST SIM ~ YES TEMPERATURE SNITCH sPRESS(PSIG) ' NOTE 1 NORMAL s -0.25" NG l ATMOS s 1 s 2 s TEST-SIM a NA e ~ ABNORMALs -0.25" NG l ATMOS ~ 1 s 2 s TEST-SIM s NA I sMANUFACTURER: UNITED ELECTRIC s ACCIDENTl 2.8 a 18 s 1 s 2 ~ TEST-SIM s YES II/% /% A ~
e
~ s e ~
e e e sMODEL NO.: 802P-5AS s NORMAL s 50 e 59 s 1 s 2 ~ TEST-S IM ~ NA e ABNORMAL e 50 l 59 s 1 e 2 s TEST-S IM s NA l s SAFETY FUNCTION: ~ ACCIDENT s 100 s 100 s 1 s 2 . l TEST-SI M a NA START UNIT COOLER UPON s RADIATION NOTE 1 REACHING HIGH TEMPERATURE a NORM GAMMAl e s ACC GAMMA I 8.2E5 ~ lE7 ~ 4 ~ 2 e TEST SIM l YES NOTE 3 s OP. CODE: A e NORM BETA s e e e ACC BETA t e e s NEUTRON e e aSPRAY s NA l NA ' NA s NA e NA ~ NA a eACCURACY ~ SUBMERGENCE'A s NA s NA ~ NA s NA ~ NA s SPEC: NA DEMOx NA e e e e lZONE NO.: ABN17504 lSUBMERGENCE: NA DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1. FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, l lSPRAY: NA a l. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. e e CRITERIA, EOEDC-i, REV 1, MAY 2, 1984. 2.NORMAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS sEQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TQ 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. UNACCEPTABLE eSUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY. SDDF ¹ IEEE-07. 144-5000A 3.COMBINED RADIATIQN FOR GAMMA AND BETA e e 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TIME DATA SHEET: FOR 40 YEARS OF QUALIFIED LIFE PLUS e FILE NO. 22-1-C3 ACCIDENT INCLUDING APPLICABLE BETA s DOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: s 4~ CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-50 REDUCTION IS 8.2E5 RADS. TQ NUREG 0588,CAT e e e e e e e l MA I NT/SURVE ILL e
REFERENCE:
NA e QUALIFIED LIFE e (YEARS): 10 e e
REFERENCE:
2 e e e
NINE NILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEN CONPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF Il C071AAH REV 0 20-Nar-85 cs s ENVIRONNENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION s I DOCUMENT REFERENCE I s s s PARAMETER. s SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED I a QUAL ~ MARGIN s REMARKS s VALUE s VALUE s SPECIFIED s QUALIFIED s NETHOD s DENO s
~ s ~ ~
I EQUIP NO.: 2HVRrrTIS23B s s s
~
s s s s ~ ~ ~ s I SPEC NO.: C071A I OP ~ TINE: I 100 DAYS s >100 DAYS s 3 ~ 2 s TEST-SIM s YES sSYSTEN: REACTOR BUILDING s s s s s s s s NOTE 1 VENTILATION NORMAL I 104/85 I 120 s 1 ~ 2 s TESTSIN s NA NOTE 2 s s ~ ABNORNALs 97 I 120 s 1 I 2 s TEST-SIN s NA ACCIDENT I 175 2SS ' 2 TEST-SIN YES ~ TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) s I 1 s ~ e TENPERATURE SNITCH 'PRESS(PSIG) NOTE 1 s 'ORMAL
~ 0 25" WG I ATMOS I 1 ~ 2 'EST SIM I NA ~ ABNORNALI -0.25"NG s'TMOS I 1 s 2 ~ TEST-SIM . s NA s INANUFACTURER: UNITED ELECTRIC ACCIDENTs 2. 8 s 18 I 1 s 2 s TEST-SIN ~ YES s
s I/ /'r J r ~ ~ ~ ~ s s a NOTE 1 INODEL NO.: 802P-SAS s NORNAL s 50 I 59 I 1 ~ 2 ~ TEST SIM ~ NA s s s ~ ABNORNALs 50 s 59 I 1 I 2 I TEST-SIM s NA ISAFETY FUNCTION: s ACCIDENT a 100 s 100 I 1 s 2 I TEST-SIN s NA START UNIT COOLER UPON 'ADIATION' NOTE 1 REACHING HIGH TENPERATURE NORN GANMA ~ e ACC GAMNA a 4. 79E6 1E7 s 4 s 2 s TEST-SIM I YES NOTE 3 s sOP. CODE: A s NORM BETA I s s ACC BETA I s s NEUTRON. I s s sSPRAY NA I NA ~ NA ~ NA s NA I NA s s s sACCURACY aSUBNERGENCEs NA I NA s NA I NA s NA ~ NA s SPEC: NA s DENO: NA s s OZONE NO.r ABS17508 sSUBNERGENCE: NA ~ DOCUNENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES 1 FOR CONPLETE ENVIRONNENTAL CONDITIONSr I ISPRAY: NA s 1 ~ EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONNENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUNENTREFERENCED. CRITERIA, EQEDC-1 r REV 1, NAY 2, 1984. 2.NORMAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOIsIN AS sEQUIPNENT NOT SUBJECT TO s 2. VENDOR ENVIRONNENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORTr NAX DESIGN/AVERAGE
~ SUBNERGENCE OR SPRAY. s SDDF 0 IEEE-07. 144-5000A 3.COMBINED RADIATION FOR GANNA AND BETA s 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TIME DATA SHEET: FOR 40 YEARS OF QUALIFIED LIFE PLUS s ~ FILE NO. 22-1-C3 ACCIDENT INCLUDING APPLICABLE BETA s DOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: ~ 4. CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-50 REDUCTION IS 4.79E6 RADS. ~ ACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT Is ~
s s s NAINT/SURVEILL s s
REFERENCE:
NA s
~ QUALIFIED LIFE s (YEARS): 10 s
REFERENCE:
2
~ ~
s ~ s s
~ a a ~
s ~ s ~ s ~
NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF ll C071AAI REV 0 20-Mar-85 e ' ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION I ~ EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION I I DOCUMENT REFERENCE ~ s PARAMETER s SPECIFIED ~ QUALIFIED 1 s QUAL 1 MARGIN e REMARKS I s EQUIP NO ~ . 2HVRssTIS23C ~ I VALUE ~ I VALUE s I SPECIFIED I
~
QUALIFIED a . a . s Ia I METHOD TEST-S I M I
~
DEMO 1
~
a -I=-== SPEC NO.: C071A lOP. TIME: 100 DAYS >100 DAYS 3 2 YES 1 SYSTEM: I REACTOR BUILD NGl 'TEMP (F) ' s 1 1 1 s I
~
I I NOTE
'20 ~ ~ s s
VENTILATION NORMAL 1 104/85 I 120 I 1 s 2 TEST-SI M 1 NA NOTE 2 I ABNORMALl 97 ~ TEST-8 I M a NA 1 1 TYPE? (DESCRIPTION) ACCIDENTl 175 1 255 1 1 I 2 s TEST-S I I'1 1 YES TEMPERATURE SNITCH 'PRESS(PSIG) ' ~ I
~ I NOTE 1 NORMAL I -0.25"WG s ATMOS 1 1 I 2 s TEST-S I M e NA I
I ABNORMALl -0.25"NG a ATMOS 1 1 s 2 s TEST-S I M s NA lMANUFACTURER: UNITED ELECTRIC ACCIDENT s 2 8 s 18 ~ 1 s 2 I TEST-SI M I YES I S ss'a I I I
~
I
~
I NOTE 1 lMODEL NO.: 802P-5AS s 'ORMAL I 50 I 59 ~ 1 ~ 2 I TEST-SIl i I NA 1 s ABNORMALs 50 l 59 2 TEST-8 I M I NA sSAFETY FUNCTION: 1 ACCIDENTs 100 I 100 1 1 I 2 s TEST-S I M s NA START UNIT COOLER UPON 'ADIATION ~ ~ ~ NOTE 1 REACHING HlGH TEMPERATURE NORM GAMMAI I I s ACC GAMMA 1 7.32E6 s 1E7 4 I 2 s TEST-8 I M s YES s NOTE I sOP. CODE: A I NORM BETA s I I I I ACC BETA I I I I I I s I I I I I I I I s NEUTRON s I I I ISPRAY s NA s NA I NA 1 NA NA sACCURACY ~ SUBMERGENCE ~ NA s NA ~ NA 1 NA s NA NA I I SPEC: NA I I ABNORMAL DEMO: NA I I I I I 1 ZONE NO. c ABS17509 I ISUBMERGENCE: NA DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1.FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONSs 1 ISPRAY: NA s 1. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. I I CRITERIA s EQEDC-1 s REV 1 s MAY 2>> 1984 ~ 2 TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS lEGUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT s MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. ISUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY. SDDF ll IEEE-07. 144-SOOOA 3.COMBINED RADIATION FOR GAMMA AND BETA s 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TIME DATA SHEET: FOR 40 YEARS OF QUALIFIED LIFE PLUS I FILE NO. 22-1-C3 ACCIDENT INCLUDING APPLICABLE BETA lDOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: s 4~ CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-50 REDUCTION IS 7.32E6 RADS. lACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT
~ ~
I I ~ I ~
~ I I I ~
I I I
~ I I
I MAINT/SURVE ILL - ~ I I ~ I I I I
REFERENCE:
NA ~ ~ I ~ ~ I ~ ~ sGUALIFIED LIFE I I
~ ~
(YEARS): 10 ~ I I I
~ I
REFERENCE:
2 I I
~ I I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
I ~ I I I I
0 NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF fl C071AAJ REV 0 20-Mar-85 I I I I ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION I EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ~
~ I I ~ I I DOCUMENT REFERENCE I s
s I PARAMETER. l SPECIFIED s QUALIFIED I s QUAL s MARGINl REMARKS s VALUE s VALUE l SPECIFIED l QUALIFIED METHOD s DEMO l I I I I I EQUIP NO.: 2HVR+T I S23D I I ~
~ ~ ~ ~ I I I I I I
~ ISPEC NO.x C071A l OP. TIME: 100 DAYS >100 DAYS 3 2 TEST-S I M YES I
---- ---- - - - s e s s s s sSYSTEM: REACTOR BUILDING'TEMP (F) ' ' ' ~
I ~ I I NOTE 1 I I VENTILATION Is NORM4L l 104/85 s 120 s 1 l 2 s TEST-S I M NA l NOTE 2 ABNORMAL'9 I 120 l 1 I 2 TEST-SIM s NA s I TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) ss ACCIDENTl 175 I 25S 1 l 2 I TEST-SIM l YES a TEMPERATURE SWITCH 'PRESS(PSIG) ~ s s I ~ ~ NOTE 1 s s NORMAL ~ -0. 25" WG I ATMOS s 1 I I TEST-S I M s NA I I ~ ~ ABNORMALI -0.25" WG l ATMOS 1 I 2 s TEST-S IM ~ NA s s MANUFACTURER: UNITED ELECTRIC ACCIDENTl 2,8 l 18 I 1 s 2 I TEST-8 IM s YES I
~ ~
I I I
~
I
~ ~
NOTE 1 IMODEL NO.: 802P-5AS ls NORMAL s 50 s 59 s 1 s 2 I TEST-S I M ~ NA I ll ABNORMALs 50 I 59 l 1 I 2 2 s TEST-SI M TEST-S IM l NA NA I lSAFETY FUNCTIONS s s ACCIDENTS 100 ~ 100 s 1 I ~ l e START UNIT COOLER UPON s I RADIATION: I ', s NOTE 1 I I REACHING HIGH TEMPERATURE NORM GAMMAs ACC GAMMA 8. 42E6 1E7 I 4 e TEST-SIM YES s NOTE 3 I I ~ OP. CODE: A ss NORM BETA l I INACCURACY I I I ss ACC BET4 I
~ ~ NEUTRON l I ~ ISPRAY NA l NA I NA I NA ssSUBMERGENCEl NA I NA s NA l NA I NA l NA I I SPEC: NA ~ ~ I ~ ~
DEMO: NA ~ ~ I I I I
~ I OZONE NO.: ABN17S04 ~ ~
sSUBMERGENCE: NA ss DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1.FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, ISPRAY: NA l s 1. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. I CRITERIA, EQEDC-i, REV 1, MAY 2, 1984 ~ 2.NORMAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS sEQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO s s 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. ISUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY. ss SDDF (l IEEE-07. 144-5000A 3.COMBINED RADIATION FOR GAMM4 AND BETA
~ I 3. EQUIPMENT OPER4BILITY TIME DATA SHEET: FOR 40 YEARS OF QUALIFIED LIFE PLUS I l l FILE NO 22-1-C3 ~ ACCIDENT INCLUDING APPLICABLE BETA I DOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: s ~ 4 ~ CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-S0 REDUCTION IS 8.42E6 RADS.
sACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT I II I ~
~
I ~
~ I I I ~ I ~ I I I ~
MAINT/SURVE ILL I I
~ I ~
REFERENCE:
NA I ~ I I ~ ~ I QUALIFIED LIFE ~
~ ~
I I I (YEARS): 10 ~ I I I
REFERENCE:
2 I ~ I I I I I ~ I I I I I ~
~ I I I
NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUNBER 50-410 SYSTEM CQNPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF tt C071AAK REV 0 20 Nar 85 s-D R R cs e
~ e ENVIRONNENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION DOCUNENT REFERENCE ~ ==== = = == = ~ == ~ ~ PARAMETER ~ SPECIFIED ~ QUALIFIED ~ s QUAL s MARGIN s RENARKS s VALUE =
s VALUE ~ SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED s NETHOD s DEMO s
~ EQUIP NQ. x 2HVRKTI 823E m s m s s m m ~ m ~ ~
SPEC NO.: C071A OP. TINE: I 100 DAYS )100 DAYS 3 2 TEST-SIN YES
-I NOTE s s s s s s s s s sSYSTEN: REACTOR BUILDINGs TENP (F): s ~
s s s s s 1 VENTILATION Is NORMAL ~ 104/85 s 120 s 1 s 2 I TEST-SIN s NA s NOTE 2 ss ABNORNALs 97 s 120 s 1 I 2 I TEST-SIM I NA s TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) I ACCIDENT 175 255 1 2 TEST-SIN I YES s e s s s s s TEMPERATURE SWITCH 'PRESS(PSIG) ' s s e a NOTE 1 NORNAL t -0.2S"WG s ATMOS s 1 2 ~ TEST-SIN t NA s ss ABNORNALs -0.25"WG ~ ATNOS I 1 s 2 I TEST-SIN I NA s INANUFACTURER: UNITED ELECTRIC ss ACCIDENTs 2.8 I 18 ~ 1 I 2 s TEST-S I M s a-YES s
~
s s s s e s s NOTE 1 sMODEL NO ~ . 802P-5AS ~ s NORMAL t 50 s 59 s 1 I 2 TEST-S I M I NA ~ I ~ ABNQRNALI 50 s 59 s 1' I TEST-SIM I NA s SAFETY FUNCTION s s ACCIDENT s 100 ~ 100 I 1 I 2 TEST-S I M a NA s START UNIT COOLER UPON ' s s a s s s NOTE 1 RADIATION'EACHING HIGH TEMPERATURE I s NORN GAMMAI s s s II ACC GAMNA s 4.39E* s 1E7 ~ TEST S IM ~ YES I NQTE IOP. CODE: A ls NORN BETA s s s s a s s ss ACC BETA I s s s s I s NEUTRON s s s s s s lsSPRAY s NA s NA NA a NA s NA ss NA s IACCURACY tlSUBMERGENCEI NA I NA s NA t NA s NA s NA s L s ea s SPFC s'eA ~
~ ~
s s DEMO: NA ~ ~ s s ~ s s IZONE NO.: ABS 17508 s s ISUBNERGENCE: NA Is DOCUNENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1.FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONNENTAL CONDITIONS, ISPRAY: NA s I 1 ~ EQUIPNENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONNENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. CRITERIA e EQEDC-1 e REV 1, NAY 2e 1984 ~ 2.NORNAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS
~ EQUIPNENT NOT SUBJECT TO s s 2 VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT a NAX DESIGN/AVERAGE.
sSUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY. ss SDDF tt IEEE-07. 144-SOOOA 3.COMBINED RADIATION FQR GANNA AND BETA I t 3. EQUIPNENT OPERABILITY TIME DATA SHEET: FQR 40 YEARS OF QUALIFIED LIFE PLUS FILE NQ. 22-1-C3 ACCIDENT INCLUDING APPLICABLE BETA s DOCUNENTATION ACCEPTABILITY' I 4 CALCULATION NO 12177 EQS 50 REDUCTION IS 4 ~ 39Eb RADS. IACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT I's s
~ s ~ ~
s ~ s s ~ ~
~ s ~ ~
s ~ s NAINT/SURVEILL- ~ s
REFERENCE:
NA
~ s ~ s
~ QUALIFIED LIFE s ~ (YEARS): 10 sl
REFERENCE:
2
~ s s s s s s ~ ~ s ~ s ~ ~ ~ s
NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 '1 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE OF 1 QUAL REF ¹ C071AAL REV 0 20-Mar-85 I
~ ~ ~ ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ~ ~ ~
I I I DOCUMENT REFERENCE
~ ~ ~ ~ PARAMETER.I SPECIFIED s QUALIFIED QUAL s MARGIN s REMARKS I ~
I I I VALUE l VALUE ~ SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED l METHOD l DEMO
~ ~ ~ I I ~
I s EQUIP NO.: ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ISPEC NO.: ~ I
~ ~ OP. TIME: 100 DAYS )100 DAYS I 3 s 2 s TEST-SIM s YES TEMP (F): I NOTE 1 lSYSTEM: G ~ ~
I
~ ~
I I NORMAL I 104/85 120 1 ~ 2 s TEST-S I M I NA NOTE 2 I I
~ ~ ABNORMALs 97 120 1 2 a TESTS IM l NA l TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) I ~ ~ ~ ACC I DENT I 175 255 1 I 2 s TEST-SIM l YES s ~ ~ I ~
NOTE 1 TEMPERATURE SWITCH ~ I ~
~
PRESS(PSIG) I I I I I I I
~ ~ NORMAL s -0.25"WG I ATMOS 1 s 2 s TEST SIM s NA I ~
I I I I I ~ ABNORMALl -0.25"WG ~ ATMOS I 1 ~ 2 ~ TEST SIM ~ NA I I MANUFACTURER: UNITED ELECTRIC I I I ~ ACCIDENT l 2.8 I 18 I 1 2 ~ TEST SIM I YES I I ~ I ~ RH (/): l I I I TEST-SIM I NOTE 1 IMODEL NO.: 802P-5AS ~ I I I NORMAL 50 59 1 s 2 I s NA
~ ~ ~
I ABNORMAL>> 50 I 59 I 1 2 s TEST-S I M I NA ISAFETY FUNCTION: I I I ~ ACCIDENT s 100 100 I 1 2 I TEST-S I M s NA I I START UNIT COOLER UPON I ~ I ~ RADIATION: l I I I I NOTE 1 I I I I ~ I I REACHING HIGH TEMPERATURE I I NORM I I 2 TEST-8 IM YES NOTE GAMMA'CC I I ~ I I GAMMA I b. 12E6 1E7 s I l I I I ~ I l OP. CODE: A I ~ NORM BETA s I I I I I I I I I
~
I I ACC BETA I I I I I
~ ~ ~ ~ NEUTRON I I I I
I
~ ~
SPRAY NA s NA I NA NA l
~ ~
lACCURACY ~ I
~ ~ SUBMERGENCEl NA I NA NA NA s ~ I SPEC: NA ~ ~
ABNORMAL I ~ I DEMO: NA I I I I ~ I I ~ I ~ l ZONE NO.: ABS17509 I ~ ISUBMERGENCE: NA
~ ~ ~ ~ DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1.FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONSa l ISPRAY: NA ~ I ~
~
- 1. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED.
~ ~
I I CRITERIA, EQEDC-1 a REV 1, MAY 2, 1984. 2 TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS EQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO ~ I
~ ~ 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE- ¹ ~
lSUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY. ~
~ ~ ~ SDDF IEEE-07. 144-5000A 3. COMBINED RADIATION FOR GAMMA AND BETA I ~ ~ ~
I 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TIME DATA SHEET: FOR 40 YEARS OF QUALIFIED LIFE PLUS I I I I ~ FILE NO. 22-1-C3 ACCIDENT INCLUDING APPLICABLE BETA I DOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: ~ I
~ ~ 4~ CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-50 REDUCTION IS 6.12E6 RADS.
IACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT Is(
~ ~ ~ ~
I ~
~ ~ ~
I ~ I
~ I I MAINT/SURVEILL- ~ ~ ~ ~
I ~
REFERENCE:
NA ~ ~ I ~ I
~ ~
I s QUALIFIED LIFE ~
~ ~
I (YEARS): 10 I
~ ~
I
REFERENCE:
2 ~
~ I I ~
I I I ~ I I
~ I ~ I ~ ~ ~ I
NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF ¹ C071AAM REV 0 17-Mar-85 s e e e
~ ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION e e
e e e DOCUMENT REFERENCE s PARAMETER. s SPECIFIED e QUALIFIED s QUAL MARGIN REMARKS eVALUE a s VALUE s SPECIFIED l QUALIFIEp e METHOD DEMO e ~ EQUIP NO.: 2HVRssTIS24A e e e e e SPEC NO.: C071A s OP. TIME: s 100 DAYS s )100 DAYS l 3 s 2 TEST SIM a SYSTEM: 'EACTOR BUILDINGl 'TEMP (F) ~ e s e e e e e NOTE 1 VENTILATION NORMAL s 104/85 l 120 l 1 s 2 e TEST-SIM NA e NOTE 2 e e e e a ABNORMALs 92 s 120 s 1 l 2 TEST-SIM NA TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) ACCIDENT! 175 255 l 2 TEST-SIM YES e TEMPERATURE SWITCH 'PRESS(PSIG) ' ---- s s l 1 a e e NOTE 1 e e e e NORMAL l ~ 25 WG s ATMOS e 1 l 2 TEST-SIM NA e s ABNORMALs .25"WG l ATMOS 1 l 2 TEST-SIM NA sMANUFACTURER: UNITED ELECTRIC s ACCIDENT ~ 2 8 I 18 l 1 e 2 TEST-SIM YES s RH (%): e ~ ~ ~ e e e e e NOTE 1 IMODEL NO.: 802P-5AS ~ NORMAL l 50 a S9 l 1 TEST-SIM NA e ~ ABNORMALs 50 ~ S9 I 4 e 2 TEST-SIM NA ISAFETY FUNCTION: ACCIDENTS 100 s 100 s 1 s 2 TEST-SIM NA START UNIT COOLER UPON 'ADIATION ' ' ' ~ e e e e e NOTE 1
~ REACHING HIGH TEMPERATURE ~ NORM GAMMAl 1 GE3 l e 4 ~ NA a ACC GAMMA l 2,9E6 l 1E7 s 4 I 2 TEST-SIM YES lOP. CODE: A l NORM BETA s NA 1 NA ~ ACC BETA s ~ 6 1E6 ~ l 4 s YES e
NEUTRON s NA ~ NA lSPRAY NA NA NA NA NA lACCURACY lSUBMERGENCEs eNA s l a NA l l NA I a NA NA SPEC: NA e e DEMO: NA e e sZONE NO.: SC196116 e e
~ SUBMERGENCE: NA DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1 ~ FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, l
~ SPRAY: NA 1 ~ EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED.
e e e CRITERIA, EQEDC-1 s REV 1, MAY 2, 1984 ~ 2.NOR MAL.TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS sEQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO l 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. sSUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY. SDDF ¹ I EEE-07 ~ 144-SOOOA e e e 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TIME DATA SHEET: e e FILE NO. 22-1-C3 s DOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: ~ 4. CALCULATION NO. 12177-PR (C) 0 sACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT Is e e l MAINT/SURVE ILL
REFERENCE:
NA e e e IQUALIFIED LIFE (YEARS): 10
~
REFERENCE:
2 e
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e ~ e
NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 ' DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE OF 1 QUAL REF ¹ C071AAN REV 0 17-Mar-85 I I
~ ~ ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ~ ~ ~
I I ~ I DOCUMENT REFERENCE s s I I PARAMETER s SPECIFIED s QUALIFIED s QUAL sMARGINl REMARKS VALUE ~ VALUE ~ SPECIFIED s QUALIFIED s METHOD ~ DEMO I I I I I I ~ IEQUIP N0.$ 2HVR+T I 824B ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I I I ~
lSPEC NO. $ C071A s lOP. TIME: s 100 DAYS l )100 DAYS I 3 s 2 l TEST-SIM I YES s REACTOR BUILDINGI I TCMD (C'i ~ I ISYSTEM$ I I I NOTE 1 I VENT IL4TION s s
" NORMAL l 104/SS ~ 120 ~ 1 l 2 s TEST-SI M l NA l NOTE 2 sl ABNORMAL'2 ~ 120 s 1 ~ 2 ~ TEST SIM I NA ~
l TYPE$ (DESCRIPTION) ACCIDENTS 175 I 255 I 1 I 2 I TEST-SIM l YES I I TEMPERATURE SWITCH
~ ~
I IPRESS(PSIG)e -
~ I l - I I I NOTE 1 ~ s NORM4L I . 25"WG l ATMOS s 1 s 2 ~ TEST SIM ~ NA ~
ls ABNORMAL' 25 WG ~ ATMOS ~ 1 I 2 I TEST-SIM ~ NA s IMANUFACTURER$ UNITED ELECTRIC ACCIDENT ~ 2 8 ~ 18 I 1 l 2 ~ TEST SIM ~ YES ~
~ ~ ~ I NOTE 1 I I lMODEL NO.$ 802P-5AS le NORMAL s S0 I 59 s 1 s 2 I TEST-SIM l NA I ss ABNORMALs S0 ~ 59 ~ 1 s 2 I TEST SIM I NA ~
<SAFETY FUNCTION: ACCIDENTs 100 l 100 l 1 I 2 l TEST SIM l NA START UNIT COOLER UPON l IR4DIATION ' ' ' ~ I I I NOTE 1 l REACHING HIGH TEMPERATURE ls NORM GAMMAI 1.8E3 s I ss ACC GAMMA s 2 9Eb ~ 1E7 s 4 ~ 2 ~ TEST SIM ~ YES I NA lOP. CODE: A ~ l NORM BETA s NA 1 I I a ACC BETA l 6. 1E6 s
~ NEUTRON ~ NA 1 l I IISPRAY NA NA l NA I NA NA NA - I I ~ ~ ~
I l ACCUR4CY IsSUBMERGENCE ~ NA ~ NA ~ NA ~ NA s NA I NA l I ~ SPEC: NA I I I DEMO: NA ~
~ ~ ~
I I ~ I
~ ~
I l ZONE NO. $ SC196116 ~
~ ~ ~
I ISUBMERGENCE$ NA DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1.FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS,'I lSPRAY$ NA s I 1. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. CRITERIA~ EQEDC 1s REV 1, MAY 2, 1984 ~ 2.NORMAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS lEQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO l l 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. ISUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY. SDDF ¹ IEEE-07. 144-5000A 3 ~ EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TIME DATA SHEET: I I FILE NO. 22-1-C3 I DOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: s l 4~ CALCULATION NO. 12177-PR (C) 0 sACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT I I ~
~ ~ ~
I
~
I I I I I ~ I I ~ I ~ ~ I ~ ~ I I ~ I I I s MAINT/SURVEILL
REFERENCE:
NA I I I I lQUALIFIED LIFE - ~ I
~ I (YEARS) $ 10
REFERENCE:
2 I I
~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ I I I ~ I I I
NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION NORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF ll C071AAO REV 0 20-Mar-85 ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION s DOCUMENT REFERENCE s PARAMETER s SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED s ~ QUAL sMARGINs REMARKS s I VALUE s VALUE l SPECIFIED ~ QUALIFIED s METHOD ~ DEMO s I
~ EQUIP NO 2HVR+TIS25A I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
s SPEC NQ.: C071A ~ OP TIME l ea~ el
~ 100 DAYS ~ )100 DAYS ~ 3 ~ 2 s TEST SIM s YES ~
I IiaeMI I I I I e ISYSTEM: REACTOR BUILDING ~
~
TE MP '(F) I I VENTILATION I NORMAL I 104/85 l 120 I 1 I 2 I TEST-8 I M I NA l NOTE 2 ABNORMAL'2 120 2 TEST-SIM NA
-----s-.----s ---- -----s-----
s I 1 l l l TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) ACCIDENTI 175 I 255 2 TEST-SIM l YES s TEMPERATURE SNITCH sPRESS(PSIG)l
~ 25"NG s
1 I s s I ---s-NOTE s 1 I I l NORMAL s s ATMOS s 1 2 I TEST-S M s. NA I ABNORMAL s
~ 25 "NG ~ ATMOS I 1 e 2 I TEST-8 I M I NA I sMANUFACTURER: UNITED ELECTRIC ACCIDENT I 2. 8 s 18 I 1 ~ 2 s TEST SIM s YES ~
I lRH (%): ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I NQTE ] sMQDEL NO.: 802P-5AS s NORMAL I 50 s 59 l 1 I 2 e TEST-SIM s NA l s ABiNORMALs 50 I 59 I 1 e 2 s TEST-8 IM ~ NA ~
~ SAFETY FUNCTION: s ACCIDENT s 100 s 100 s 1 s 2 . I TEST-SIM l NA l START UNIT COOLER UPON ~ RADIATION' I s s I I l NOTE 1 REACHING HIGH TEMPERATURE ~ NORM GAMMA' I I I s ACC GAMMA s 3-54E6 s 1E7 I 4 ' 2 s TEST-SIM l YES l NOTE 3 I I I I I sOP. CODE: A s NORM BETA s I
ACC BETA I I I I I s I I I I
~ NEUTRON s II lACCURACY SPEC: NA ISPRAY sSUBMERGENCEI I
I l NA NA iNA s s NA I I NA NA I s NA NA l l NA NA I I NA NA l s l I I I I I ABNORMAL DEMO: NA I I I I I OZONE NO.: SCi'96116 I sSUBMERGENCE: NA DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES'.FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, s lSPRAY! NA l 1. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED., I CRITERIA, EQEDC-l, REV 1, MAY 2, 1984. 2 TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS lEQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO l 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. ISUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY. I l 3 SDDF () IEEE-07 '44-5000A EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TIME DATA FILE NO. 22-1-C3 SHEET'OR 3.COMBINED RADIATION FOR GAMMA AND BETA 40 YEARS QF QUALIFIED LIFE PLUS ACCIDENT INCLUDING APPLICABLE BETA lDOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: 4 ~ CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-50 REDUCTION IS 3.54E6 RADS. sACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT I ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
I ~ ~
~ I ~ ~
I MAINT/SURVEILL I I
~ ~
i
REFERENCE:
e NA I ~ I I I I
~ I I QUALIFIED LIFE ~ ~ ~ ~
I ~ (YEARS): 10 I I
REFERENCE:
2 ~
~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ I I ~
I I
~ ~
I ~ I ~
~ I
NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF ¹ C071AAP REV 0 17-Mar-85 s
~ R s s s s ~
s s ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION s s
~ ~
s s s DOCUMENT REFERENCE
~ PARAMETER ~ SPECIFIED ~ QUALIFIED ~ e QUAL I MARGIN s REMARKS s s VALUE s VALUE I SPECIFIED s QUALIFIED I METHOD I DEMO s s ~ ~
2HVR+TIS25B ~ ~ s ~ sEQUIP NO ~ . ~
~ s ~ s s s s ~
TIME 100 DAYS )100 3 2 TEST-8 I M YES ISPEC NO.: C071A OP
- -DAYS I
CSYSTEM: REACTOR
~
BUILDINGs 'TEMP (F)
~
s ~
' - s s
NOTE 1 VENTILATION NORMAL I 104/85 120 1 2 I TEST-S I M s NA I NOTE 2 i s s s s s ABNORMALI 92 e 120 s 1 a 2 TEST-SIM s NA ~ 255 2 TEST-SIM YES i1 TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) ACCIDENTs 175 I 1 I ~ s ~
~ e TEMPERATURE SWITCH 'PRESS(PSIG)' ' ' ~ ~ NOTE 1 s
s s s NORMAL I ~ 25"WG I ATMOS s 1 s
' a TEST-SIM ~ NA s s ABNORMALs .25"WG s ATMOS a s 2 s TEST-S IM s NA s sMANUFACTURER: UNITED ELECTRIC ACCIDENTI 2.8 I 18 I 1 a 2 s TEST-8 1M I YES ~
s I i'I fe/$ s s s s
~
s s s s NOTE 1 sMODEL NO.: 802P-5AS s NORMAL I 50 s 59 ~ 1 s 2 TEST-SIM e NA
~ ABNORMAL'0 s S9 I 1 ~ 2 I TEST-S IM s NA e s SAFETY FUNCTION: I ACCIDENTe 100 s 100 s 1 - s 2 TEST-SIM s NA a START UNIT COOLER UPON 'ADIATION s NOTE 1 REACHING HIGH TEMPERATURE s NORM GAMMA s 1 ~ 1E6 4 e s
s NA s ACC GAMMA I SE5 ~ 1E7 I 4 e 2 ~ TEST-8IM a YES a e OP. CODE: A e NORM BETA s NA s 1 s NA s I ACC BETA I 6. 1E6 s YES I NEUTRON s NA ~ s 1 e s NA ~ sSPRAY I NA s NA s NA s NA NA e NA s s sACCURACY ~ SUBMERGENCEI NA ~ NA I NA s NA NA s NA I SPEC: NA s DEMO: NA s s s I ZONE NO.: SC196113 eSUBMERGENCE: NA DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1.FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CON DITIONS,s
, SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED.
s ISPRAYc NA s 1 ~ EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN CRITERIA, EQEDC-l, REV 1, MAY 2, 1984. 2.NORMAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS s IEQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO ~ 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. ISUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY. SDDF ¹ I EEE 144-5000A e'. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TIME DATA SHEET: s s IDOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: s iFILE s
~ 4 ~
NO. 22-1-C3 CALCULATION NO 12177 PR (C) 22 0 eACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0S88,CAT s II s s
~ s ~ s ~ s s s ~ s s ~ s s ~ ~
e MAINT/SURVEILL- ~ s
~ ~
REFERENCE:
NA s s
~ ~
e e IQUALIFIED LIFE - s (YEARS): 10
REFERENCE:
2 s ~
~ ~
s s
~ s s s s ~ ~ s ~ ~
NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF ¹ C071AAQ REV 0 17-Mar-85 ~ R I cs x R I
~
I I I ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION
~ DOCUMENT REFERENCE ~
I s PARAMETER.I SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED QUAL ~ MARGIN I REMARKS VALUE I VALUE a SPECIFIED s QUALIFIED s METHOD I DEMO I I 2HVR+T I 825C I ~ I I ~ ~ IEQUIP NO.: ~ I I I I ~ I ~ ~ I ISPEC NO.! C071A ~ ~ OP TIME I 100 DAYS ~ )100 DAYS e 3 ~ 2 ~ TEST-S I M ~ YES s ISYSTEM: REACTOR BUILDINGTEMP (F) ~ ~ NOTE 1 I I VENTILATION II NORMAL I 104/85 I 120 s 1 I a NA I NOTE 2 I I N4 I I s ~ ABNORMAL ~ 92 ~ 1 20 ~ 1 2 I ~ I TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) s s ACCIDENT s 175 s 255 e 1
~
2 I I I YES,II TEMPERATURE SWITCH I 'PRESS(PSIG) I I NOTE 1 I I I
'ORMAL -. 25 "WG ~ ATMOS I 1 I 2 I NA ~
I I ss ABNORMALI .25"WG s ATMOS I 1 I 2 ~ NA sMANUFACTURER: UNITED ELECTRIC s ~ ACCIDENT I 2 8 I 18 I 1 I I YES I
~ I RLI /)
LI I( V'a Y'a ~ I NOTE 1 IMODEL NO.: 802P-5AS se NORMAL s 50 I 59 s 1 I 2 ~ N4 I I II ABNORMALI 50 59 I 1 I 2 I N4 I I SAFETY FUNCT I ON I I ACCIDENT ~ 100 I 100 ~ 1 NA I START UNIT COOLER UPON I s RADIATION: I I ~" I ~ ~ I
~ NOTE 1 REACHING HIGH TEMPERATURE el NORM GAMMAs 1 1E6 s 4 ~ NA I s ~ ACC GAMMA I 5E5 s 1E7 ' s 2 I TEST-S I M I YES I NA I IOP. CODE: A s ~ NORM BETA ~ NA 1 s I ACC BETA s 6. 1E6 I 4 s YES I I
I ~ ~ NEUTRON ~ NA 1 e N4 I IISPRAY I NA I NA I NA I NA I NA I NA s IACCURACY slSUBMERGENCE ~ NA I NA ~ NA ~ NA ~ NA ~ NA I I SPEC: NA ~ I I I DEMO: N4 ~
~ ~
I
~ I ~ I I I s ZONE NO.: SC196113 I I sSUBMERGENCE: NA DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1.FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, s ISPRAY: NA ~ s 1 ~ EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. I I CRITERIA, EQEDC-1, REV 1, MAY 2, 1984. 2. NOR MAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS IEQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO I I 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE aSUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY. s I SDDF ¹ I EEE-07. 144-5000A I I I I 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TIME DATA SHEET: FILE NO. 22-1-C3 I DOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: I I 4. CALCULATION NO. 12177-PR (C) 0 IACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT I I I I ~ I
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ I I ~ I ~ I I MAINT/SURVE ILL ~ ~ ~
I
REFERENCE:
NA ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
I I
'0 ~
I
~ QUALIFIED LIFE I ~ ~
I I (YEARS) ~
~
I
REFERENCE:
2 ~
~ ~
I I I
~ I ~ I ~ I ~ I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION NORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF (l C071AAR REV 0 20-Mar-85 a a e
~ ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND GUALIFIC4TION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION a a ~
a DOCUMENT RE FERENCE a s PARAMETER. s SPECIFIED s QUALIFIED I QUAL sMARGINa REMARKS a VALUE l VALUE s SPECIFIED s QUALIFIED l METHOD s DEMO a
~ ~ ~
2HVRssT I S25D
~ a a lEQUIP NO.: a ~
a a
~
a a ~ a a ~ a a lSPEC NO.: C071A e eOP.TIME: l 100 DAYS s )100 DAYS s 3 2 s TEST SIM ~ YES I REACTOR BUILDING TEMP (F) a ~ ~ NOTE 1 s SYSTE M: s ~ ~ s a VENTILATION ls NORMAL e 104/85 l 120 s 1 s 2 l TEST-S IM s NA NOTE 2 a sl ABNORMALe 92 l 120 1 2 s TEST-S I M s NA s 255 2 TEST-S I M YES l
- 175 TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) s s ACCIDENTS a ~ 1 I s l s
TEMPERATURE SNITCH 'PRESS(PSIG) ' ' s
~ a ~
NOTE 1 a a ss NORMAL a -.25"WG s 4TMOS e 1 2 TEST-S I M a NA e a a ls ABNORMALs ~ 25"NG s ATMOS l 1 2 s TEST SIM ~ NA ~ MANUFACTURER UNITED ELECTRIC I I ACCIDENT l 2. 8 s 18 s 1 2 s TEST-S I M s YES e a a sRH (/) ~ a a
~
NOTE 1 lMODEL NQ.: 802P-5AS ss NORMAL e 50 a 59 a 1 2 e TEST-SIM s NA l
~ s ABNORMALa 50 l 59 1 2 I TEST-SIM s NA l e SAFETY FUNCTION: ~ ~ ACCIDENTS 100 ~ 100 s 1 e 2 ~
s TEST-SIM s NA START UNIT COOLER UPQN 'RADIATION ~ a
~
a
~
a NOTE 1 REACHING HIGH TEMPERATURE ll NORM GAMMA' 2 a a TEST-S I M a a YES a a NOTE 3 a a ACC GAMMA l 2.73E6 l 1E7 l 4 a a s Is NORM BETA a aOP. CODE: A s a a a ls ACC BETA s a a a a ss NEUTRON ~ a a a a asSPRAY NA l NA s NA NA ~ NA s NA e sACCURACY lsSUBMERGENCEe'A l NA s NA NA s NA s NA s SPEC: NA a a
~
a
~
DEMO: NA a
~ a a ~
a ~ ZONE NO.: SC196116 a ~ s a a eSUBMERGENCE: NA DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1.FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, s ISPR4Y: NA e e 1. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. a CRITERIA, EQEDC-l, REV 1 s MAY 2s 1'984- 2.NORMAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHONN AS sEQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO e s 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE-
~ SUBMERGENCE OR SPR4Y. le SDDF 4t IEEE-07. 144-5000A 3.COMBINED RADIATION FOR GAMMA AND BETA a s s 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TIME DATA SHEET: FOR 40 YEARS OF QUALIFIED LIFE PLUS a
l l FILE NO. 22-I-C3 ACCIDENT INCLUDING APPLICABLE BETA l DOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: s e 4. CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-50 REDUCTION IS 2.73E6 RADS.
'ACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588sCAT I a a
a
~ ~ ~
a ~ a
~ ~
a ~
~ ~
a a
~ ~ ~ ~
MAINT/SURVE ILL
~ a I ~ a ~
REFERENCE:
NA a a a a ~ ~
~ ~
l QUALIFIED LIFE ~
~
a a (YEARS): 10 a a a a REFERENCE'. 2 a a a a a ~
~ a ~ a ~ ~
a ~ a a e s
~ ~
NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEN COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF ¹ C071AAS REV 0 17-Mar-85 e Ma s ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION I. EQUIPNENT DESCRIPTION s s DOCUNENT REFERENCE s
=~~================~====~===== ~ s PARAMETER s SPECIFIED s QUALIFIED s QUAL I NARG IN s REMARKS VALUE I VALUE e SPECIFIED e QUALIFIED s NETHOD e DENO I
'EQUIP s NO 2HVR+TIS264 ~ ~ s
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e s
a ~ ~ s Rs e ~ s I SPEC NO.: C071A ~ ~ OP TINE s 100 DAYS I >100 DAYS I 3 ~ 2 I TEST SIN ~ YES REACTOR BUILDINGI TENP (F): I I NOTE 1 s CSYSTEM: e e I ~ s VENTILATION ~ s NORNAL ~ 104/93 I 120 ~ 1 - ~ 2 ~ TEST SIN s NA NOTE 2 s s ss ABNORMALI 106 s 120 s 1 I 2 I TEST-SIN a NA e TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) ACCIDENTI 200 I 255 1 2 TEST-SIM YES I
- --- s s ~
I I
~ s TENPER4TURE SWITCH I aPRESS(PSIG) s a
s s I I -e NOTE 1 s Is NORNAL e
.25"WG I ATMOS s 1 s 2 ~ TEST-SIN I N4 e s
s ~ s ABNORNAL ~ ~ 25 WG I ATMOS ~ I NANUFACTURER: UNITED ELECTRIC I I ACCIDENTe 2-8 s 18 s 1 e 2 I TEST-SIN s YES I s s s s s s NOTE 1 INODEL NO.: 802P-54S s NORNAL s 50 ~ 59 s 1 s 2 I TEST SIN s NA s ~ ABNORNAL ~ 50 s 59 ~ 1 ~ 2 s TEST SIN ~ NA ~ SAFETY FUNCTION: ACCIDENT I 100 I 100 ~ 1 ~ 2 ~ s TEST SIN ~ NA s s START UNIT COOLER UPON a 'RADIATION s I ' ' ' -'s NOTE 1 REACHING HIGH TENPERATURE el NORM GANMA>> 2E6 I s 4 ~ s NA s I ACC GANM4 ~ 1E6 s 1E7 I 4 s 2 s TEST SIN ~ YES sOP. CODE: A sa NORN BETA I NA 1 a NA s s II ACC BETA e 6 '1E6 e s a YES a s s ss NEUTRON I NA e 1 a NA s ssSPRAY s NA s NA s NA s NA s NA s NA s sACCURACY ~ ISUBMERGENCE ~ NA I NA s NA s NA I NA s NA SPEC: NA ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
DEMO: NA ~ s s ~ ~
~ ~
e ZONE NO.: SC215122 s
~ ~ ~
ISUBNERGENCE: NA ss DOCUNENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1 ~ FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONNENTAL CONDITIONS, a ISPRAY: NA I s 1 ~ EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONNENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUNENT REFERENCED. s CRITERIA> EQEDC I t REV 1 a NAY 2a 1984 ~ 2.NORNAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS IEQUIPNENT NOT SUBJECT TO s 'e
- 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, NAX DESIGN/AVERAGE.
~ SUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY. e s SDDF ¹ IEEE-07a 144-59004 s I 3. EQUIPNENT OPERABILITY TINE DATA SHEET:
s s ~ s FILE NO. 22-1-C3 s DOCUNENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: e e 4. CALCULATION NO. 12177-PR (C) 0 eACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT s I' ~ ~ s s s ~ ~ s s ~ s s ~ s ~ ~
~ s s s s NAINT/SURVEILL ~ ~
REFERENCE:
NA s ~ ~
~ s ~ QUALIFIED LIFE (YEARS): 10 s
REFERENCE:
2 ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s ~ ~
s s s ~
NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF ¹ C071AAT REV 0 20-Mar-85
~ ~ ~ ~ ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ~ ~ ~ ~
e s
~ ~ DOCUMENT REFERENCE s
s PARAMETER s SPECIFIED l QUALIFIED s QUAL s MARGIN s REMARKS s VALUE ~ VALUE SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED s METHOD s DEMO s
~ s ~ s ~
2HVR+T IS26B s l EQUIP NO.: ~ s
~
s s s ~ s s s eSPEC NO.: C071A sOP. TIME: ~ 100 DAYS s )100 DAYS s 2 s TEST-SIM s YES s <<SYSTEM: REACTOR BUILDINGs 'TEMP (F) s s s s s s s NOTE 1 s VENTILATION NORMAL l 104/93 120 s 2 s TEST-SIM l NA s NOTE 2 i'55 s s s s s ABNORMALl 106 s 120 2 s TEST-SI M l NA s s TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) s ACCIDENTs 200 2 s TEST-SIM l YES s iTEMPERATURE s SWITCH ePRESS(PSIG) l s a ~ s
~
s s s s NOTE 1 s s NORMAL ~ ~ 25"WG l ATMOS 2 s TEST-SIM s NA s s e ABNORMALi' .25"WG l ATMOS a 2 l TEST-8 IM l NA e l MANUFACTURER: UNITED ELECTRIC ACCIDENT e 2. 8 l 18 s 2 l TEST-SIM s YES s e s s RH (/) e s ~ s s NOTE 1 eMODEL NO.: 802P-5AS s NORMAL s 50 s 59 s 2 s TESTS I M s NA s s s s s ABNORMALs 50 l 59 2 TEST-SIM ~ NA sSAFETY FUNCTION: ACCIDENT s 100 e 100 a s 2 . I TEST-SIM s NA START UNIT COOLER UPON aRADIATION: s s s s NOTE 1 s s REACHING HIGH TEMPERATURE l NORM GAMMAs s s s s ACC GAMMA s 5. 51E6 l 1E7 2 I TEST-SIM ~ YES ~ NOTE 3 s s lOP. CODE: A s ~ NORM BETA s s s s s s ACC BETA s s s s s s s
~ NEUTRON ~ s s s e s
s lSPRAY NA s NA I NA NA NA a IACCURACY ISUBMERGENCEs NA s NA s NA e NA l NA s I SPEC: NA s s s DEMO: NA s s s s l ZONE NO-: SC215122 e s lSUBMERGENCE: NA DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1 ~ FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, a sSPRAY: NA s s 1. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. CRITERIA i EQEDC-1 t REV 1 a MAY 2e 1984 2.NORMAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS
- 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATI REPORT, MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE.
'N sEQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO s aSUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY. SDDF ¹ IEEE-07 ~ 144-5000A 3.COMBINED RADIATION FOR GAMMA AND BETA s 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TIME DATA SHEET: FOR 40 YEARS OF QUALIFIED LIFE PLUS FILE NO. 22-1-C3 ACCIDENT INCLUDING APPLICABLE BETA ~ DOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY ~ i4.
s CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-50 REDUCTION IS 5.51E6 RADS. sACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT Is e e s s s s s MAINT/SURVEILL
REFERENCE:
NA lQUALIFIED LIFE s (YEARS): 10
REFERENCE:
2
~ s ~ s s ~
s s
~ ~
s ~ s ~ s s
0 NINE NILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEN COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF (I C071AAU REV 0 20-Nar-85 ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION a a a EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ~ a s DOCUNENT REFERENCE a a a a s PARAMETER. s SPECIFIED s QUALIFIED a a QUAL I MARGIN s REMARKS a a a a a a VALUE VALUE s SPECIFIED s QUALIFIED METHOD DEMO a EQUIP NO ~ . 2HVR+T IS26C a a
~ ~
s a a a a a
~ ~ ~
a s SPEC NO.: C071A s OP. T INES a 100 DAYS >100 DAYS s 3 s TEST-SIN s YES s s SYSTEM: REACTOR BUILDING TENP (F):
~ a I a
a a a a
~
a a NOTE 1 VENTILATION s NORNAL a 104/93 120 a 1 2 i'EST-SIM I NA NOTE 2 s ABNORNALs 106 s 120 1 2 s TEST-SIM NA s I TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) ACCIDENTe 200 a 255 1 2 TEST-SIN YES I TEMPERATURE SWITCH ~ PRESS (PSIG) I a a NOTE 1 NORNAL .25"WG s ATMOS 2 TEST-SIN s NA a ABNORMALI .25 "WG s ATMOS s TEST-S I N s NA s sMANUFACTURER: UNITED ELECTRIC I ACCIDENT ~ 2.8 18 2 I TEST-S I M s YES ~ a s RH (%): a a a a a a NOTE 1 sNODEL NO.: 802P-5AS I NORNAL s 50 s 59 2 s TEST-SIN s NA s ABNORNALs 50 s 59 2 I TEST-S I M I NA s s SAFETY FUNCTION: s ACCIDENT s 100 I 100 2 TEST-SIN NA I ATION:
~ s s START UNIT COOLER UPOiN I RAD s a a
a a a a
~ a a NOTE 1 I REACHING HIGH TEMPERATURE s NORN GAMNA ~ 2E6 s 4 a NA s s ACC GANNA 1. 3E6 1E7 TEST-SIN I YES sOP. CODE: A s NORM BETA s NA 1 s NA e a
s ACC BETA ~ 6. 1E6 4 s YES s a ~ NEUTRON si NA 1 I NA ~ a a sSPRAY NA ~ NA NA ~ NIA ~ sACCURACY sSUBNERGENCEa NA NA NA I NA s SPEC: NA DEMO: NA a a sZONE NO.: a a ~ SUBMERGENCE: DOCUNENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1.FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, I ~ SPRAY: s 1 ~ EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONNENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. CRITERIA, EQEDC-1, REV 1, NAY 2~ 1984. 2.NORNAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS sEQUIPNENT NOT SUBJECT TO s 2. VENDOR ENVIRONNENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, NAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. sSUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY. SDDF l) I EEE-07 ~ 144-5000A a s 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TIME DATA SHEET: a FILE NO. 22-1-C3 s DOCUNENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: s s 4. CALCULATION NO. 12177-PR (C) 0 sACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT Is a a a a a a NAINT/SURVEILL
REFERENCE:
NA s QUALIFIED LIFE (YEARS): 10 a
REFERENCE:
2
~ ~ ~ a a ~
a ~
~ ~ ~ a a ~
a ~
NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF ¹ C071AAV REV 0 17-Mar-85 a
~ ~ ~ ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ~ ~ ~
s s s DOCUMENT REFERENCE l s a ~ ~ PARAMETER, s SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED ~ s QUAL s MARGIN I REMARKS s e VALUE l VALUE l SPECIFIED e QUALIFIED s METHOD ~ DEMO s s EQUIP NO.: ~
~
s s s s ~~ ~
~
s s
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
s sSPEC NO.: l ~ OP TIME ~ 100 DAYS ~ )100 DAYS ~ 3 l 2 l TEST SIM ~ YES CSYSTEM: 'TEMP s s (F> ~ s s
~
s a s a s s NOTE 1 s s e NORMAL I 104/93 e 120 s 1 s 2 s TEST-S I M l NA NOTE 2 s ss ABNORMALI 106 l 120 s 1 I 2 s TEST-SIM s NA a TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) sl ACCIDENTs 200 e 255 e 1 e 2 ~ TEST-SIM ~ YES TEMPERATURE SN I TCH 'PRESS (PSIG) NOTE
'A s ~ 1 s
s NORMAL I 25"WG s ATMOS l 1 l 2 s TEST SIM ~ NA ~
~ 'BNORMAL' 25" NG s ATMOS ' ' 2 ~ TEST SIM IMANUFACTURERs UNITED ELECTRIC s I ACCIDENT l 2.8 s 18 s 1 s 2 l TEST-SIM s YES s
s s s ~ s NOTE 1 eMODEL'O.: 802P-5AS ~ s NORMAL I 50 e 59 s 1 s 2 a TEST-S IM ~ NA ~ ABNQRMALs 50 l 59 l 1 s 2 s TEST-SIM a NA lSAFETY FUNCTION: l e ACCIDENTs 100 a 100 a 1 s 2 s TEST-SIM s NA START UNIT COOLER UPON s s s NOTE 1 s REACHING HIGH TEMPERATURE ls NORM GAMMAl 2E6 NA s
~ s ACC GAMMA ~ 9 3E5 1E7 s 4 s 2 I TEST-SIM l YES sOP. CODE: A ~ ~ NORM BETA s NA ~ 1 s NA s s
s a s ACC BETA l 6. 1E6 I e YES s NEUTRON e NA s l 1 s s NA esSPRAY s NA s NA a NA s NA a NA s NA IACCURACY ~ ~ SUBMERGENCE l NA l NA l NA I NA I NA ~ NA SPEC: NA s s a s s DEMO: NA s s s s s s s s s l 20NE NO.: SC215122 ~
~ ~ ~
lSUBMERGENCE: NA DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1.FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, l sSPRAY: NA e e 1. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT EQEDC-1, REV 1, MAY 2, 1984 ~ 2.NORMAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHONN AS REFERENCED'RITERIA,
~ EQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO s l 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT e MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE UNACCEPTABLE OR SPRAY.
lSUBMERGENCE SDDF ¹ IEEE-07 ~ 144-5000A
~ s 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TIME DATA SHEET:
s FILE NO. 22-1-C3 l DOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: s ~ 4. CALCULATION NO. 12177-PR (C) 0 TO NUREG 0588,CAT I ~ s
~ ~ ~
s
~ s s s s s s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
s ~ ~ s MAINT/SURVEILL ~
~ ~ ~
s
REFERENCE:
NA s s
~ ~
a s s ~ s s QUALIFIED LIFE s s s s (YEARS>: 10 a s
~
s
REFERENCE:
2 s s s s
~ ~
s ~ s ~
~ s ~ a ~ s s ~ ~ ~
0 NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF ll C071AAW REV 0 20-Mar-85
~ ~
s
~ ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ~
a
~ ~
s DOCUMENT REFERENCE a e s ~ PARAMETER s SPECIFIED ~ QUALIFIED ~ s QUAL IMARGINl REMARKS s s s VALUE s VALUE s SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED s METHOD s DEMO ~
'1 EQUIP NO.: 2HVRssTIS26E s ----- -- -- --- ----- ---- 'NA s a s ~ s ~ s s I
l SPEC .NO.: sSYSTEM: C071A REACTOR VENTILATION aa l OP. BUILDING <<TEMP (F): TIME: NORMAL s s l 100 DAYS 104/93 s s l
>100 DAYS 120 s
a 3 s l s 2 2 s s l TEST-SIM TEST-SIM
~
a YES l NOTE l 1 NOTE 2 ABNORMALl 106 120 l 1 2 TEST-SIM NA s l TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) a ACCIDENTl 200 s l
---255 l
I 2 s l TEST-SIM
'ES s - - - -I -
TEMPERATURE SMITCH lPRESS(PSIG)<< l ~ s l s NOTE 1 NORMAL ~
.25"WG s ATMOS s 1 l 2 s TEST-SIM s NA l s
ABNORMALs ~ 25"WG s ATMOS s 1 s 2 s TEST-SIM s NA s
~ MANUFACTURER UN1 TED ELECTRIC ~ ACCIDENT s 2 8 l 18 s 1 l 2 ~ TEST SIM YES a RH (/): NOTE s 1 <<MODEL NO.: 802P-5AS ~ NORMAL s 50 s 59 1 l 2 ~ TEST SIM s NA ABNORMAL<< 50 ~ 59 1 s 2 s TEST-SIM s NA a l SAFETY FUNCTION: ACCIDENT l 100 l 100 l 1 l 2 . l TEST-SIM l NA START UNIT COOLER UPON s RADIATION ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s NOTE 1 REACHING HIGH TEI'<<PERATURE s NORM GAMMAs s s ACC GAMMA s 3.'91E6 s lE7 s 4 a 2 s TEST-SIM ~ YES s NOTE 3 ~ OP. CODE: A s NORM BETA s s s ACC BETA s s
s s NEUTRON s s s <<SPRAY NA NA NA NA ~ NA ~ NA lACCURACY sSUBMERGENCEs NA s NA s NA I NA s NA s NA s s SPEC: NA ~ s s
~
DEMO: NA s a s s s OZONE sSPRAY: NO.: <<SUBMERGENCE: SC215122 NA NA s s l 1 DOCUMENT
~
REFERENCE'OTES: EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN 1.FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS,l SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. CRITERIAs EQEDC 1 s REV 1 s MAY 2s 1984 ~ 2.NORMAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS <<EQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO 2 VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORTs MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. sSUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY. 3. SDDF I IEEE-07. 144-5000A 3. COMBINED RADIATION FOR GAMMA AND BETA s s EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TIME DATA SHEET: FOR 40 YEARS OF QUALIFIED LIFE PLUS FILE NO. 22-1-C3 ACCIDENT INCLUDING APPLICABLE BETA IDOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: 4~ CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-50 REDUCTION IS 3. 91E6 RADS. I' s ~ ACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588sCAT s s s s s l MAINT/SURVE ILL a
REFERENCE:
NA s a s s QUALIFIED LIFE (YEARS): 10 s
REFERENCE:
2 s s
~ ~ ~ ~
s ~
<< ~
s s a ~
~ s
NINE NILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER SO-410 SYSTEN COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF ¹ C071AAX REV 0 17-Nar-85
~ ~ ~
s ENVIRONNENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ~
~
s s s ~ s s s DOCUNENT REFERENCE s s I s PARRNETER e SPECIFIED e QUALIFIED e QUAL s MARGIN a REMARKS I VALUE s VALUE I SPECIFIED e QUALIFIED I METHOD s DENO I eEQUIP NO ~ . 2HVR+T I S27A s s s s s s
~
s s
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
sSPEC NO.: C071A I s OP TIME s 100 DAYS s >100 DAYS ~ 3 ~ 2 s TEST SIN ~ YES ~ SYSTEN: REACTOR BUILDING ~ s s ~ ~ s
~
s
~ ~ NOTE 1 s
VENTILATION ss NORNAL s 104/88 I 120 I 1 ~ 2 I TEST SIN I NA ~ NOTE 2 s s ss ABNORNALs 94 s 120 1 s 2 s TEST-SIN I NA s 255 i2 e TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) ACCIDENT I 175 s 1 ~ 2 ~ TEST SIN ~ YES I TENPERATURE SWITCH a sPRESS(PSIG) I I s NOTE 1 se NORNAL .25"WG ATMOS 1 s 2 TEST-SIN NA ee ABNORNAL s
~ ~ 25"WG s
s ATMOS s s 1 s e s TEST-SIM iNA s e e e sNANUFACTURER: UNITED ELECTRIC ~ ~ ACCIDENTS 2 8 ~ 18 I 1 I 2 I TEST-SIN I YES a s s s s
~
s s s s s s s s NOTE 1 eNODEL NO.: 802P-5AS sl NORMAL s 50 ~ 59 ~ 1 s 2 s TEST SIN ~ NA ~ s s ls ABNORNRLs 50 s 59 ~ 1 2 s TEST-S I M I NA s sSAFETY FUNCTION: s I ACCIDENT s 100 s 100 ~ 1 I 2 I TEST SIN ~ NA ~ START UNIT COOLER UPON s IA1I LVls1 RHD LH BHIJ ION ~ s s s s s NOTE 1 REACHING HIGH TEMPERATURE I I NORM GAMNAI 5.1E5 e 4 s e NA I ls ACC GANNA I 6.9ES s 1E7 a 4 s 2 s TEST-SIN s YES sOP. CODE: A ss NORN BETA s NA 1 s s NA s s s s ACC BETA s 6 1E6
~ a s s s YES s s
s sl NEUTRON I NA s s 1 s s NA s slSPRAY I NA s NA ~ NA I NA s NA I NA s sACCURACY alSUBNERGENCEs NA NA . I NA NA NA NA "NA s ~ s s s SPEC. s ~ DEMO: NA ~ s
~
s s s s s IZONE NO.: SC240135 ~ s ~
~
ISUBNERGENCE: NR Is DOCUNENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1.FOR CONPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, I ISPRAY: s s NR sEQUIPNENT NOT SUBJECT TO s s I s
- 1. EQUIPNENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONNENTAL DESIGN 2.
CRITERIA, EQEDC-1, REV 1, NAY 2, 1984 VENDOR ENVIRONNENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT,
'.NORNAL SEE THE DOCUNENT REFERENCED.
TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS NAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. ISUBNERGENCE OR SPRAY. SDDF ¹ IEEE-07.144-5000A s 3 EQUIPNENT OPERABILITY TINE DATA SHEET FILE NO. 22-1-C3 s DOCUNENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: e s 4. CALCULATION NO. 12177-PR (C) 0
~ ACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s ~ s ~ s s ~
s ~ ~
~ ~
s ~ s NAINT/SURVEILL- ~
~ ~ ~
REFERENCE:
NA s s
~
s s ~ QUALIFIED LIFE s s s s
~ ~ s (YERRS): 10 s s ~ ~
e
REFERENCE:
2 s s s s s s s ~ s s s s s s s ~ s s s s
NINE NIL POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM CONPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF ¹ C071AAY REV 0 17-Mar-85 s s
~
s
~
s ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPNENT DESCRIPTION ~ s s
~
s DOCUMENT REFERENCE e l s PARAMETER l SPECIFIED ~ QUALIFIED s QUAL a MARGIN REMARKS s s VALUE s VALUE s SPECIFIED l QUALIFIED e METHOD t DENO s EQUIP NO.: 2HVRssTI S27B ~
~
a s ' s s s
~
s s s s
~ s e
as eSPEC NO.: C071A s s OP ~ TINE' 100 DAYS ~ )100 DAYS I 3 I 2 TEST-SIN s YES sSYSTEN: REACTOR BUILDING'TEMP (F) ~ ' s s s s NOTE 1 s VENTILATION ts NORMAL e 104/88 I 120 t 1 s 2 TEST-SIM s NA s s NOTE 2 ls ABNORNALs 94 I 120 s 1
~
2 ~ TEST-SIN ~ NA a TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) s s ACCIDENT ~ 175 s 255 ~ 1 ~ 2 I TEST-SIM s YES TENPERATURE SWITCH 'PRESS(PSIG) s NOTE 1 NORNAL s
's ~ 25"WG e ATNOS 1 2 TEST-SIN NA ee ABNORNALs -.25"WG s ATMOS I 1 2 s TEST-SIN NA sNANUFACTURER: UNITED ELECTRIC ACCIDENT I 2. 8 e 18 t 1 2 TEST-SIM YES ~ ~ s ~ s s s s
s NOTE 1 eNODEL NO.: 802P-5AS le NORNAL s 50 59 1 2 TEST-8 IM ae ABNORMAL'0 e 59 s 1 l 2 TEST-SIN tSAFETY FUNCTION: se ACCIDENT>> 100 s 100 t 1
~
2 s TEST-SIM START UNIT COOLER UPON BAD I AT I 0 N ~ ~ NOTE 1 l REACHING HIGH TEMPERATURE l I NORM GAMMAt 5. 1E5 s s s NA s s tt ACC GANMA s 7.4E5 s 1E7 ~ 4 s 2 l TEST-S IN YES ~ OP CODE; A Ie NORM BETA s NA e e 1 s NA s e s l ACC BETA s 6 ~ 1E6 I YES It NEUTRON s NA s s 1 l NA llSPRAY s NA s NA NA s NA . l NA NA sACCURACY ~ ISUBNERGENCEt NA ~ NA s NA s NA I NA NA SPEC: NA s s
~ ~
DENO: NA ~
~ ~
s s s s ~ ~ OZONE NO.: SC240135 ~
~
s s tSUBNERGENCE: NA It DOCUNENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, l lSPRAY: NA e s 1. EGUIPNENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN THE DOCUNENT REFERENCED. s s CRITERIA s EGEDC-1 s REV 1 s NAY 2 s 1984 AL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS IEQUIPNENT NOT SUBJECT TO s s 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT~ DESIGN/AVERAGE. ~ SUBNERGENCE OR SPRAY. a s SDDF ¹ I EEE-07. 144-5000A s I 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TINE DATA SHEET: s
~ t FILE NO ~ 22-1-C3 I DOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: s s 4 ~ CALCULATION NO ~ 12177-PR(C) 22 0 lACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT I ~ ~
s
~
s s
~ s s a s s s s s s s ~
s ~ ~ s ~ ~ l NA INT/SURVEILL ~ s
~ ~
REFERENCE:
NA e s
~
s
~ ~ ~ ~
l QUALIFIED LIFE s s
~
s (YEARS): 10 ~
~ ~
s
REFERENCE:
2 s s s
~ ~ ~
s s s a ~ s ~ s ~ s s s s s s
NINE NIL OINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUNBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALU4TION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF ¹ C071AAZ REV 0 17-Nar-85 I I
~ ~ ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPNENT DESCRIPTION ~
I I
~
I I
~ DOCUMENT REFERENCE I I PARANETER I SPECIFIED,'UALIFIED QUAL s MARGIN I RENARKS I
I I V4LUE s VALUE I SPECIFIED s QUALIFIED I NETHOD s DEMO s a EQUIP NO.: 2HVR+T I S27C ~
~
I I I I I I I I
~ ~
I
~
I I I s SPEC NO.: C071A s ~ OP. TINE: s 100 DAYS s )100 DAYS s 3 s 2 TEST-SIN I YES I sSYSTEN: REACTOR BUILDING sTENP (F)'
~ e s ~ ~ NOTE 1 I
I VENTILATION sl NORNAL I 104/88 s 120 s 1 I 2 TEST-SIN I NA I NOTE 2 I sl ABNORNALs 94 s 120 s
~
2 ~ TEST-SIN s NA s I TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) s I ACCIDENTs 175 s 2S5 ~ 1 TEST-SIN s YES TEMPERATURE SWITCH 'PRESS(PSIG) ' ' ' ' NOTE 1 sll NORMAL I - ~ 25"WG s ATMOS s 1 2 I TEST-SIN I s NA s s I I ABNORMALs .25"WG s ATNOS I 1 2 TEST-SIN s NA s I NANUFACTURER: UNITED ELECTRIC s ~ ACCIDENT I 2 8 ~ 18 ~ 1 I 2 TEST-SIM I YES I I I I ssnn NOTE 1 INODEL NO.: 802P-5AS ~ ~ NORMAL ~ 50 s 59 1 2 TEST-SIN ~ NA I sa ABNORNALs SO I 59 1 2 TEST-SIM s NA ~ SAFETY FUNCTION: ACCIDENT I 100 s 100 s 1 I 2 TEST-SIN I NA START UNIT COOLER UPON 'RADIATION ' ' ' ' s NOTE 1 I REACHING HIGH TEMPERATURE s s NORN GANMAa 5. 1E5 I s 4 I NA I s I I sl ACC GANNA I 2. 1E6 I 1E7 I 4 I 2 TEST-SIN s YES I OP. CODE: I I A sa NORN BETA I NA 1 I NA I I I
~~ ACC BETA ~ 6 1E6 I s YES s I
I II NEUTRON I NA I I 1 s NA I sACCURACY SPEC: NA lsSPR4Y
~
I I ssSUBMERGENCEI
~ ~
INA I NA I I NA NA s s NA NA s s NA NA I NA NA s NA NA s I I I I I DEMO: N4 ~
~ I I I
I I ~ I ~ I I IZONE NO.: SC240135 ~
~
I I I I sSUBNERGENCE: NA ~ ~ DOCUNENT REFERENCE NOTES: 1.FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONNENTAL CONDITIONSs I ISPRAY: NA I I 1. EQUIPNENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONNENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED'AL I I I s CRITERIA, EQEDC-1, REV 1, NAY 2, 1984 ~ 2. NOR TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS IEQUIPNENT NOT SUBJECT TO 2- VENDOR ENVIRONNENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORTs NAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. sSUBMERGENCE OR SPR4Y. s ~ SDDF ¹ IEEE-07. 144-SOOOA s ~ 3 EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TINE DATA SHEET I s FILE NO- 22-1-C3 I DOCUNENTAT ION ACCEPTABILITY: s s 4. CALCULATION NO. 12177-PR (C) 0 IACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588sCAT II I
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I I I I I I I I I ~
I ~ I I NA INT/SURVEILL
REFERENCE:
I NA ~
~ I I I ~
I I LIFE
~
I QUALIFIED ~
~ ~
I I I (YEARS): 10 ~ ~
REFERENCE:
2 ~
~
I I I I I ~
~ I ~ I ~ ~
I ~ I I I I
NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 20-Mar-85 QUAL REF ll C071ABA REV 0 a I I I I a I a a m m, s aa ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION a I I ~ EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION I I I I I DOCUMENT REFERENCE s I PARAMETER I SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED s QUAL l MARGIN s REMARKS I VALUE s VALUE I SPECIFIED s QUALIFIED s METHOD s DEMO s I I I I ~ ~ I ~ s EQUIP NO ~ . 2HVRssTIS28A ~ I I
~
I I ~ I ~ I I ~ sSPEC NO.$ C071A s l OP. TINE: l 100 DAYS s >100 DAYS l 2 s TEST-S I M I YES I I sSYSTEM$ REACTOR BUILDING TEMP (F) s s
~ I I NOTE 1 I
VENTILATION ss NORMAL I 104/85 I 120 ~ 2 l TEST-SIM l NA l NOTE 2 I ss ABNORMALs 87 I 120 s 2 s TEST-8 IM I NA TYPE$ (DESCRIPTION) ss ACCIDENTI 200 I 255 I s 2 ~ TEST SIM I YES s e TEMPERATURE SWITCH ~ IPRESS(PSIG) I 'I l
~
I I ~ NOTE 1 I I ss NORMAL l .25"WG I ATMOS s 2 I TEST-SIM s NA l ls ABNORMALs ~ 25 WG s ATMOS s I TEST-8 I M s NA l lMANUFACTURER$ UNITED ELECTRIC s s ACCIDENTI 2.8 I 18 2 s TEST-8 I M I YES l I I s IRH (/) $
~ ~ I I I I ~ ~ NOTE 1 sMODEL N0.$ 802P-5AS ss NORMAL l 50 s 59 I 2 s TEST-SIM s NA l ABNORMALs 50 I 59 I 2 l TEST-SIM I NA I
~ SAFETY FUNCTION: I s ACCIDENT s 100 s 100 s 2 - l TEST-S IM ~ NA s START UNIT COOLER UPON s sRADIATION$ ~ s
~ I I ~ I I NOTE 1 I I I REACHING HIGH TEMPERATURE sl NORM GAMMAI I I I I I
I sl ACC GAMMA I 3.26E6 I lE7 I I 2 s TEST-S IM YES I NOTE 3 I I sOP. CODE: A ss NORM BETA s I I I I I I I I ACC BETA s I I I I I le NEUTRON s I I llSPRAY NA I NA s NA e NA s NA s IACCURACY ssSUBMERGENCEI NA l NA s NA I NA s NA s I SPEC: NA ~
~ I ~
DEMO NA ~ I ~
~ ~ ~ ~
I IZONE NO.$ SC261145 I
~ ~
sSUBMERGENCE$ NA DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1 ~ FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, I eSPRAY$ NA s ~ 1. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. I CRITERIAs EQEDC-1, REV 1s MAY 2s 1984 ~ 2.NORMAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS sEQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO s s 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. lSUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY. SDDF 5 IEEE-07 '44-5000A 3.COMBINED RADIATION FOR GAMMA AND BETA I I s s 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TIME DATA SHEETs FOR 40 YEARS OF QUALIFIED LIFE PLUS I s s FILE NO. 22-1-C3 ACCIDENT INCLUDING APPLICABLE BETA I DOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: I l 4~ CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-50 REDUCTION I 8 3- 26E6 RADS. IACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT II ~ ~
~
I ~ I
~
I ~
~ ~
I I I ~ I ~ I I I
~ I MAINT/SURVEILL-I ~ ~ ~ ~
REFERENCE:
NA
~ ~
I ~ s QUALIFIED LIFE ~
~
I
~
(YEARS) $ 10 ~
~ ~ ~
l
REFERENCE:
2 ~
~ ~
I
~ I ~ ~
I ~
~ ~
I I I ~
~ I I ~
NINE I'IILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUNBER 50-410 SYSTEN COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF ¹ C071ABB REV 0 20-Nar-85 e R R a aa ENVIRONNENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPNENT DESCRIPTION
-a e:-- s DOCUMENT REFERENCE s a a s aaa a PARANiETER s SPECIFIED e QUALIFIED s s QUAL aNARGINe REMARKS I s VALUE s VALUE I SPECIFIED s QUALIFIED a NETHOD e DENO ~
s EQUIP'O.: 2HVR+T I S28B ~ ~ ~ s s e ~
~
m m ~ s s s a w a
~ SPEC NO C071A IOP. TIME: I 100 DAYS I )100 DAYS I 3 s 2 s TEST-SIN e YES a s SYSTEN: REACTOR BUILDING TEMP (F> ' ' s s NOTE a sph~l I ~ s I '04/85 e a s s s VENTILATION I NORMAL I 120 s 1 I 2 e TEST-SIN I NA e NOTE 2 ~ ABNORNAL ~ 87 I 120 ~ 1 ~ 2 s TEST SIN ~ NA ~
e TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) ACCIDENT ~ 200 s 255 s 1 s 2 s TEST SIN s YES a TEMPERATURE SWITCH ~ PRESS(PSIG) I s ~ s I s ~ NOTE 1 I NORMAL I .25 "WG s ATNOS s 1 ~ 2 s TEST-SIN I NA e s ABNORNALI .25"WG s ATMOS s 1 s 2 s TEST-SIN I NA aNANUFACTURER: UNITED ELECTRIC I ACCIDENTI 2.8 I 18 e 1 s 2 s TEST-SIN s YES s s aaa~ g /$ s s e s s s s s NOTE } sMODEL NO.: 802P-5AS a NORNAL s 50 I 59 I '1 e 2 I TEST-SIN s NA s I ABNORMAL s 50 I 59 s 1 e 2 s TEST-SIN s NA e sSAFETY FUNCTION: ACCIDENT s 100 s 100 s 1 s 2 - ~ TEST-SIN s NA I START UNIT COOLER UPON s RADIATION I s s s s s NOTE 1 REACHING HIGH TENPERATURE I NORM GANMAs e s s ACC GAMNA s 3 26E6 s 1E7 ~ 4 s 2 I TEST SIN s YES s NOTE 3 e OP. CODE: A NORM BETA s ACC BETA
'A s s s e NEUTRON s s e s sSPRAY e NA I NA I NA s NA ~ NA ~ ACCURACY ISUBMERGENCEI NA s NA ~ NA ~ NA s NA ~ NA s SPEC: NA e ~
s s DEMO: NA s s s s s s IZONE NO ! SC261145 s s sSUBNERGENCE: NA DOCUNENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1.FOR CONPLETE ENVIRONNENTAL CONDITIONS sSPRAY: NA s 1 ~ EQUIPNENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONNENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUNENT REFERENCED. CRITERIA, EQEDC-i, REV 1, NAY 2, 1984 ~ 2.NORMAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS IEGUIPNENT NOT SUBJECT TO I 2. VENDOR ENVIRONNENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, NAX DESIGN/AVERAGE sSUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY. a SDDF ¹ IEEE-07. 144-5000A 3.CONBINED RADIATION FOR GANNA AND BETA a s s 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TINE DATA SHEET: FOR 40 YEARS OF QUALIFIED LIFE PLUS s s a FILE NO. 22-1-C3 ACCIDENT INCLUDING APPLICABLE BETA ~ DOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: e 4 CALCULATION NO. 12177-EGS-50
~ REDUCTION IS 3 26E6 RADS.
sACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT e III s s e NAINT/SURVEILL-
REFERENCE:
NA s QUALIFIED LIFE s s (YEARS>: 10
REFERENCE:
2
~ ~ ~ ~
s s s ~ e e
~ s a ~ ~ s
NINE NILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUNBER SO-410 SYSTEN COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 17-Nar-85 QUAL REF ¹ C071ABC REV 0 I I
~ ~ ENVIRONNENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPNENT DESCRIPTION ~
I
~ ~
DOCUNENT REFERENCE I PARANETER I SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED s I QUAL I NARGIN ss RENARKS s I EQUIP NO.: 2HVRssTIS28C- I I VALUE I I I VALUE I I
~ ~
I SPECIFIED
~ ~ ~
QUALIFIED I=--~I=---- YES ~
~
I METHOD e
~
s
--==--=-===-
DENO s
~ ~
I SPEC NO.: C071A ~ OP TINE ~ 100 DAYS ~ )100 DAYS I 3 ~ 2 ~ TEST SIN I s TENP (F ) NOTE 1 ISYSTEN: REACTOR BUILDIN8 ~
~ ~ s s ~ ~ ~ ~
NOTE 2 VENTILATION I NORMAL ~ 104/SS I 120 I 1 I 2 I TEST-SIN ~ NA I ABNORNALI 87 I 120 I 1 a 2 ~ TEST-SIN I NA s 200 255 2 I TEST SIN YES I I TYPE: s (DESCRIPTION) TEMPERATURE SWITCH s ACCIDENT
'PRESS(PSIG) ~
I I I
~
I 1
~
I - I s
~
I s
-sI NOTE ~ NORMAL I ~ 25"WG I ATNOS I 1 I 2 s TEST-SIM s NA s s ABNORNALs .25"WG I ATNOS s 1 s 2 I TEST SIN s NA ~
I NANUFACTURER: UNITED ELECTRIC ~ ACCIDENT I 2. 8 I 18 I 1 I 2 I TEST-SI M s YES I I Ib I I I ~ I I I ~ NOTE 1 INODEL NO.: 802P-5AS NORMAL IIRRADIATION ~ SO I 59 I 1 ~ 2 I TEST-SIN ~ NA I s ABNORMAL'0 s 59 s 1 I 2 s TEST-SIN I NA sSAFETY FUNCTION! ACCIDENTs 100 I 100 s 1 I 2 ~ I TEST SIN ~ NA I
~ ' ' I I I NOTE 1 START UNIT COOLER UPON s s ~
NORM GANNA 1E6 NA s REACHING HIGH TENPERATURE ~ s I ACC GANNA s 1 2E6 ~ 1E7 s 4 ~ 2 ~ TEST SIN s YES A NORN BETA NA NA I OP. CODE: I s ACC BETA s 6. 1E6 s ~ 4 I YES NEUTRON I NA s 1 ~ s I NA ISPRAY sACCURACY eSUBNERGENCEs NA ~ NA s NA I NA ~ NA s NA SPEC: NA DENO: NA I OZONE NO.: SC261145 I sSUBNERGENCE: NA ~ DOCUMENT REFERENCE NOTES: 1 ~ FOR CONPLETE ENVIRONNENTAL CONDITIONS, I ISPRAY: NA 1. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONNENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. I CRITERIA, EQEDC-i, REV 1, MAY 2, 1'F84. 2.NORMAL TENPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS IEQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO 2- VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORTs NAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. ISUBNERGENCE OR SPRAYS SDDF ¹ IEEE-07. 144-SOOOA s 3. EQUIPNENT OPERABILITY TINE DATA SHEET: I I FILE NO 22-I-C3
~
IDOCUNENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: s 4 ~ CALCULATION NO. 12177-PR (C) 0 I IACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT ~ I I I I I ~ I ~ ~ I I ~ I I I I ~ I I I
~ I I NA I NT/SURVEILL- I
REFERENCE:
NA
~ ~ ~
I ~ I
~ I s QUALIFIED LIFE ~
I
~ ~
I (YEARS) ! 10 I ~
REFERENCE:
2 I ~ I ~ I ~ I I I I
NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF (I C071ABD REV 0 20-Mar-85 ~ M w s I
~ ~ ~
I ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION I EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ~ I I I I DOCUMENT REFERENCE I I s PARAMETER, s SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED I I QUAL IMARGIN ~ REMARKS I VALUE VALUE SPECIFIED QUALIFIED I METHOD DEMO
~
I ~ ~ s 2HVRssT I 830A I I IEQUIP NQ.: ~
~ ~ ~ =~ I a
I I I I I I I ~ sSPEC NO.: C071A flOP. TIME: s 100 DAYS I )100 DAYS I 3 s 2 ~ TEST SIM ~ YES ISYSTEM: REACTOR BUILDING'TEMP <F) I I ~ I I I I NOTE 1 I I VENTILATION NORMAL s 104/85 s 120 s 1 I 2 I TEST SIM I NA I NOTE 2 I al ABNORMAL'6 s 120 s 1 ~ 2 s TEST-S I M s NA I TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) ACCIDENT I 325 ~ 255 s 1 s 2s5 ~ AN + DATA s NA s NOTE 3 I I TEMPERATURE SWITCH PRESS<PSIG)'s NOTE 1 I NORMAL s
. 25"WG I ATMOS ~ 1 2 s TEST-S I M I NA s I s s ABNORMAL ~ ~ 25 WG I ATMOS I 1 I 2 TEST-S I M s NA s sMANUFACTURER: UNITED ELECTRIC I I ACCIDENTs 3. 8 I 18 1 2 s TEST-S I M I YES I I 'RH (/) ~ ~
I I
~ ~ I I
I I NOTE 1 sMODEL NO.: 802P-SAS ~ s NORMAL I 50 I 59 1 ~ 2 TEST-S IM ~ NA I I ss ABNORMAL'0 s 59 I 1
' s TEST-S IM I NA I ISAFETY FUNCTION: I I ACCIDENTI 100 s 100 s 1 I 2 ~ I TEST-S I M I NA s I I START UNIT COOLER UPON RADIATION NOTE 1 REACHING HIGH TEMPERATURE NORM GAMMAs 2 ~ 4E4 ~ 4 I NA I I ~ ~ ACC GAMMA s 8 ~ 3E5 ~ 1E7 s 4 s TEST-S IM s YES ~
IOP. CODE: A le NORM BETA s NA s NA I sl ACC BETA s 6 1Eb s I 4 I YES I I II NEUTRON I NA I NA I ssSPRAY I NA I NA I NA NA ~ NA ~ NA ~ IACCURACY ssSUBMERGENCEI NA I NA I NA NA s NA ~ NA I I SPEC: NA ~
~ I I ~ ~
DEMO: NA ~ ~ I ~ ~ I ~ ~ I ZONE NO. s SC175106 ~ I I
~
sSUBMERGENCE: NA ss DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1 ~ FQR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, I sSPRAY: NA I s l. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. CRITERIA, EQEDC-1, REV 1 s MAY 2, 1984- 2.NORMAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS
~ EQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO 2 VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORTs MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE.
ISUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY. SDDF ff IEEE-07. 144-SOOOA 3.UNIT COOLER IS NORMALLY OPERATED VIA
~ I 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TIME DATA SHEET: TEMPERATURE INDICATING SWITCH. HQW-I FILE NO. 22-I-C3 EVER, DURING THE DBA OR IN ANY OTHER s DOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: I I 4. CALCULATION NO. 12177-PR (C) 0 EVENT, IF THE TEMIPERATURE INDICATING ~ ACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588 s CAT I S. LOGIC DRAWING NQ. 12177-LSK-22-18 SWITCH FAILS, THE CONTROL ROOM OPER- ~ ~ ~ ~ ATOR CAN OPERATE TH UNIT COOLER VIA A fc I
I I I I CONTROL SWITCH MOUNTED ON THE CONTROL sA
~
I I
~
PANEL. SEE REFERENCE 5. I ~ I
~ I s MAINT/SURVEILL ~
I ~
~
I I
REFERENCE:
NA ~ ~
~ I I I s QUALIFIED LIFE (YEARS): 10 I
REFERENCE:
2 I ~
~ I ~ ~ ~ I ~ I ~ ~
I I
~ I I ~
NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 50-410 SYSTEN CQNPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 DOCKET NUNBER OF 1 20-Nar-85 QUAL REF Il C071ABE REV 0
~
I I I ENVIRONNENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION I DOCUMENT REFERENCE PARANETER I SPECIFIED s QUALIFIED I I QUAL I NARGIN s RENARKS s QUALIFIED DENO I EQUIP NO.: 2HVRssTIS30B s VALUE ~ VALUE I I I SPECIFIED I
~ -~m I ~ m NETHOD s ~
I
~
NO.: C071A sOP. TINE: I 100 DAYS )100 DAYS 3 I 2 s TEST SIN I YES I sSPEC s s I NOTE 1 SYSTEN: REACTOR BUILDING TENP (F) s s s ~ ~ ~ I e 104/85 120 1 2 TEST-SIN NA NOTE 2 VENTILATION NORNAL I s ~ ~ ABNORMALI s 86 s 120 a 1 s 2 I'EST-SIN s NA (DESCRIPTION) ACCIDENTs 325 255 I 1 I 2,5 AN + DATA I NA ~ NOTE 3 I TYPE: I I TEMPERATURE SNITCH I PRESS (PS IG) ~ I ~ s I I NOTE 1 I NORNAL s
~ 25"WG ~ ATMOS 1 s 2 I TEST-SIN ~ NA I ABNORNALI .25"NG I ATMOS I 1 I 2 I TEST-SIN I NA IMANUFACTURERx UNITED ELECTRIC ACCIDENT I 3.8 I 18 a 1 s 2 I TEST-SIM I YES I I I I RH (%): ~ ~ ~ I I ~
I I NOTE 1 sNODEL NQ.: 802P-5AB I NORNAL I 50 s 59 ~ 1 ~ 2 TEST-BIN I NA ~ I I ABNORNAL ~ 50 ~ 59 s 1 s 2 s TEST-SIN I NA ISAFETY FUNCTION: I ACCIDENT s 100 s 100 s 1 s 2 ~ TEST SIN I NA s I ~ I I NOTE 1 START UNIT COOLER UPON RADIATION s
~
I NORN GAMNAs 2.4E4 4 NA I REACHING HIGH TENPERATURE s s I I ACC GAMNA I 1 ~ 1E6 s lE7 s 4 s 2 I TEST-SIN I YES I NORN BETA NA I NA I I OP. CODE! A ~ I I ACC BETA I 6: 1E6 s 4 YES I
~ NEUTRON s NA I NA s I ISPRAY I NA I NA s NA I NA NA NA IACCURACY sSUBNERGENCEI NA I NA I NA I NA NA I NA I SPEC) NA I NA DEMO:
I I ZONE NO.: SC175106 sSUBMERGENCE: NA s DOCUNENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1.FOR CONPLETE ENVIRONNENTAL CONDITIONS, s sSPRAY: NA I 1 ~ EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONNENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUNENT REFERENCED. CRITERIAs EQEDC-1, RFV 1, NAY 2, 1984. 2.NORMAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AB I IEQUIPNENT NOT SUBJECT TO I 2 VENDOR ENVIRONNENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORTs MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. ISUBNERGENCE OR SPRAYS s SDDF 4 IEEE-07. 144-5000A 3.UNIT COOLER IS NORMALLY OPERATED VIA I I I 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TINE DATA SHEET: TEMPERATURE INDICATING SNITCH, HOW-s FILE NO. 22-1-C3 EVER, DURING THE DBA OR IN ANY QTHER s DOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: s 4. CALCULATION NO. 12177-PR (C) 0 EVENTs IF THE TEMPERATURE INDICATING IACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT Ie I 5. LOGIC DRAWING NO. 12177-LSK-22-1S SNITCH FAILS, THE CONTROL ROOM OPER-I ATOR CAN OPERATE THE UNIT COOLER VIA A CONTROL SWITCH MOUNTED QN THE CON-I TROL PANEL. SEE REFERENCE 5. I NA INT/SURVE ILL
~
REFERENCE:
NA I
<<QUALIFIED LIFE (YEARS): 10 s
REFERENCE:
2
~ ~ ~ I ~ I ~ I ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~
I I
e NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF ¹ C071ABF REV 0 17-Mar-85 s s a s ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION a s s s I DOCUMENT REFERENCE s e PARAMETER. I SPECIFIED a QUALIFIED a QUAL a MARGIN e REMARKS s s s VALUE VALUE SPECIFIED QUALIFIED a METHOD I DEMO I 2HVRssT I S31A s ~ EQUIP NO.: s s s s s ~ s s s s ~ s ~ ~ s ~ ISPEC NO.: C071A s I OP. TIME: 100 DAYS ~ >100 DAYS 2 a TEST-S I M ~ YES a ISYSTEM: REACTOR BUILDINGs TEMP (F): s I NOTE 1 VENTILATiON NORMAL s 104/95 ~ 120 2 e TEST-S I M a NA NOTE 2 a s ~ ABNORMALs 139 139 2,5 I TEST-8IM I NA a a TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) a ACCIDENTs 175 a 255 2 a TEST-S IM a YES s TEMPERATURE SWITCH ~ PRESS(PSIG) a e e s s s NOTE 1 s s I NORMAL I .25"WG ATMOS 2 s TEST-SIM a NA I s ABNORMALa .25"WG ATMOS 2 I TEST SIM s NA s a MANUFACTURER: UNITED ELECTRIC ACCIDENT I 2.8 I 18 2 I TEST-SIM I YES s sRH (/): s a s e s NOTE 1 IMODEL NO.: 802P-5AS e NORMAL a 50 s 59 2 I TEST-SIM I NA a 50 59 TEST-S IM NA ABNORMALa s'A s s s s I s ISAFETY FUNCTION: ACCIDENTS 100 s 100 ~ I TEST-S I M ~ I SENSE INLET AIR TEMPERATURE aRAD IATI ON: a s s NOTE 1 FOR 2HVRssUC413A I NORM GAMMAI 1. BE6 s I NA I ACC GAMMA s 7 1E5
~ 1E7 s TEST-S IM I YES a OP. CODEs A s NORM BETA NA 1 s NA I I ACC BETA I 6.'1E6 s YES a s
s s NEUTRON NA 1 NA sSPRAY NA NA NA NA I NA I NA sACCURACY ISUBMERGENCEI NA NA NA NA NA I NA I s SPEC: NA s DEMOS NA s sZONE NO.: SC289155 s ISUBMERGENCE: NA DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1 ~ FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONSs s aSPRAY: NA I l. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESI GN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. s s CRITERIAs EQEDC-1 s REV 1s MAY 2s 1984 ~ 2.NORMAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS IEQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO s 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. ISUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY. s SDDF ¹ IEEE-07. 144-5000A s s s 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TIME DATA SHEET:
~ FILE NO. 22-1-C2 DOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: 4. CALCULATION NO. 12177-PR (C) 0 I' ~ a aACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT I 5. CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-31 a MAINT/SURVEILL I
REFERENCE:
NA IQUALIFIED LIFE (YEARS): 10
REFERENCE:
2
~ ~
s s s ~
~ ~
NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50 4 1 0 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF ¹ C071ABG REV 0 17-Mar-85 e
~ ~ ~ ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ~
e e e
~ e t DOCUMENT REFERENCE e e
PARAMETER SPECIFIED QUALIFIED e, QUAL MARGIN REMARKS e e I s a t l s s e e VALUE I VALUE l SPECIFIED ~ QUALIFIED s METHOD i DEMO I s EQUIP NO.: 2HVRssT I 831B e e e e e e
~ ~ ~
e
~ e e ~
e
~ a e
e e sSPEC NO.: C071A s eOP TIME s 100 DAYS e >100 DAYS l 3 e 2 s TEST SIM t YES eSYSTEM: REACTOR BUILDING ls=s ~ e e e e NOTE 1 e VENTILATION NORMAL ~ 104/95 ~ 120 a 1 l 2 e TEST-SIM l NA NOTE 2
~ s ABNORMALI 139 s 139 s 1 ~ 2s5 s TEST SIM ~ NA
<<TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) l ~ ACCIDENT ~ 175 s 255 ~ 1 s 2 ~ TEST SIM ~ YES
'8 TEMPERATURE SWITCH 'PRESS(PSIG) e NOTE 1 sl NORMAL l .25"WG t ATMOS s 1 l 2 s TEST-SIM s NA e
e ss ABNORMALl ~ 25"WG l ATMOS e 1 s 2 s TEST-SIM s NA IMANUFACTURER: UNITED ELECTRIC ACCIDENT' 8 e 1 ~ 2 s TEST SIM ~ YES I J%
/% ~ ~ ~ s ~ e e e e
e NOTE 1 lMODEL NO.: 802P-5AS ss NORMAL s 50 e 59 s 1 ~ 2 t TEST SIM s NA e ~ e ABNORMALs 50 s 59 e 1 s 2 ~ TEST-SIM l NA SAFETY FUNCTION: l ACCIDENT I 100 l 100, 1 l 2 l TEST SIM NA e ~ ~ ~ s ~ SENSE INLET AIR TEMPERATURE 'RADIATION ' ' ' ' l l s NOTE 1 FOR 2HVR+UC413B ll NORM GAMMAs 1 ~ GE6 l 4 e e s NA l ee ACC GAMMA ~ 9.7ES t ~ 4 s 2 l TEST SIM ~ YES l OP. CODE: A I I NORM BETA l NA e e 1 l NA e ACC BETA l 6. 1E6 e e 4 I e s YES s e st NEUTRON NA e e l NA
'A e ~ 1 a t SPRAY NA NA I NA NA l NA .NA sACCURACY ~
IsSUBMERGENCEs
~
NA s
~ NA I a ~ NA e NA s
l NA s SPEC: NA ~
~ ~ ~ e e
DEMO: NA ~
~ ~
e e e e
~ ~
lZONE NO.! SC289155 ~
~ ~ ~
sSUBMERGENCE: NA DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1.FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS,a eSPRAY: NA ~ s 1. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. CRITERIA, EQEDC-i, REV 1, MAY 2, 1984 ~ 2.NORMAL TEMPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS eEQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO e s 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. sSUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY. SDDF ¹ IEEE-07. 144-5000A e e ~ 3 EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TIME DATA SHEET e e FILE NO. 22-1-C2
~ DOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: a t 4. CALCULATION NO. 12177-PR (C) 0 'ACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588sCAT Ile l 5. CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-31 ~ ~ ~ ~ e ~ e e ~
e e
~ ~ ~ e s MAINT/SURVE ILL ~
e ~
~
REFERENCE:
NA ~
~ ~
e e e ~
~ ~
s QUALIFIED LIFE ~
~ ~
e (YEARS): 10 ~ e
~
e
REFERENCE:
2 ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
e ~
~ ~ ~ e e ~
e e
~ ~ ~ ~
NINE MILE PLAINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM CONPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF II C071ABH REV 0 20-Mar-85 ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPNENT DESCRIPTION s s DOCUMENT REFERENCE a s PARANETER s SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED a s QUAL IMARGINs REMARKS s VALUE ~ VALUE s SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED ~ METHOD s DEMO s s EQUIP NO.: 2HVR+TIS3SA s s
~ ~
s s s s s s
~ ~ s ~
s
~ ~
SPEC NO.: C071A OP. TINE: 100 DAYS >100 DAYS 3 2 TEST-SIN YES ~ s s s s s a ~ aSYSTEN: REACTOR BUILDING sTEMP (F):
~ s s s s
s s NOTE s 1 VENTILATION s NORNAL s 104/85 I 120 s 1 s 2 ~ TEST SIM ~ NA s NOTE 2 s s s ABNORMAL'7 s 120 s 1 s 2 a TEST-SIM ~ NA I TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) ACCIDENT 200 255 2 TEST SIM YES TEMPERATURE SWITCH sPRESS(PSIG) I
~ - -, --- ~
s
----- I s --- 1 s
s
~
s
----- ~
s
-s NOTE 1 s
s NORNAL .2S"WG ATNOS s 2 TEST-S I M NA s
'8 s s a I 1 a s s s
s s ABNORMAL'.25"WG is ATMOS s 1 s 2 ~ TEST-S I M I NA s /MANUFACTURERS UNITED ELECTRIC ACCIDENT 2.8 1 2 TEST-SIM YES
-I ~ s s ~ a s s
s s RH (/): I s NOTE 1 INODEL NO.: 802P-SAS ~ NORNAL ~ 50 ~ 59 1 2 a TEST-SIN a NA I s s s s ABNORMAL'0 s 59 s 1 s 2 s TEST-SIM I NA a s I SAFETY FUNCTION: a ACCIDENT s 100 a 100 s 1 a 2 . I TEST-SIM s NA s s START UNIT COOLER UPON I RADIATION s s s ~ s ~ ~ NOTE 1 REACHING HIGH TEMPERATURE a NORM GAI'INA s I s s s s ACC GAMMA s 3.26E6 a 1E7 s 4 s 2 . e TEST-SIM s YES ~ NOTE 3 IOP. CODE: A a NORM BETA s s s s s ACC BETA s s s s s NEUTRON s s s s ISPRAY NA : NA NA I NA I NA NA I s a sACCURACY sSUBNERGENCEs NA I NA I NA s NA I NA I NA s s s SPEC: NA ~ s s s s DEMO: NA s s s s s s IZQNE NO.: SC261145 s sSUBNERGENCE: NA DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1.FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS,I I SPRAY: . NA I 1 ~ EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SEE THE DOCUNENT REFERENCED. CRITERIA, EQEDC-1, REV 1, NAY 2, 1984. 2.NORMAL TENPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS IEQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO I 2. VENDOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE. aSUBNERGENCE OR SPRAY. SDDF (I I EEE-07. 144-5000A 3.COMBINED RADIATION FOR GAMNA AND BETA s I 3. EQUIPNENT OPERABILITY TINE DATA SHEET: FOR 40 YEARS OF QUALIFIED LIFE PLUS s FILE NQ. 22-1-C3 ACCIDENT INCLUDING APPLICABLE BETA s DQCUNENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: I 4~ CALCULATION NO. 12177-EQS-50 REDUCTION IS 3.26E6 RADS. sACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT Iss s s s I MAINT/SURVEILL
REFERENCE:
NA s s QUALIFIED LIFE - (YEARS): 10
REFERENCE:
2 s s s s s
NINE NILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEN CONPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF, 1 QUAL REF ¹ C071ABI REV 0 17-Nar-85 aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaacaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaacaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ac aacaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa s s s s ENVIRONNENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPNENT DESCRIPTION ~
~
s
~
s s I DOCUMENT REFERENCE s PARANETER s 'SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED s QUAL sNARGIN REMARKS I VALUE I VALUE s SPECIFIED s QUALIFIED NETHOD I DEMO s s s sEQUIP NO.: ~ s s s s s s s s
~
ISPEC NO.: I OP. TINE: e 100 DAYS I >100 DAYS I 3 I 2 TEST-S IN I YES sSYSTEN: GI 'TENP (F) s s NOTE 1 s NORMAL e 104/85 I 120 I 1 s 2 TEST-SIN e NA NOTE 2 s s ABNORMAL'7 s 120 I 1 s 2 TEST-SIM NA I TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) s ACCIDENTs 200 s 25S I 1 I 2 TEST-SIN s YES TENPERATURE SWITCH 'PRESS(PSIG) ' s s s NOTE 1
~ NORNAL I 25"WG s ATNOS I 1 ~ 2 ~ TEST-SIN NA s
s ABNORNALs .25"WG I ATMOS I TEST-SIN NA IMANUFACTURER: UNITED ELECTRIC ACCIDENT e 2. 8 I 18 s 1 s 2 s TEST-SIN YES RH (/) s s s s NOTE 1 INODEL NO.: 802P-5AS s NORNAL I 50 e 59 I '1 TEST-SIN NA s s s ABNORNALI 50 I 59 s 1 I 2 s TEST-SIN s NA sSAFETY FUNCTION: I ACCIDENT 100 100 1 2 TEST-SIM NA e ~ s ~ START UNIT COOLER UPON IRADIATION: " I s s I s s NOTE 1 REACHING HIGH TEMPERATURE NORM GAMMAI 1E6 e I 4 s 'NA e I ACC GANNA I 9.7ES I 1E7 e 4 s 2 s TEST-8IM s YES e OP. CODEs A s NORN BETA I NA I s 1 s NA s s ACC BETA I 6 ~ 1E6 I s 4 s YES s s I NEUTRON s NA s 1 s I NA s s sSPRAY I NA I NA s NA I NA s NA sACCURACY ISUBNERGENCE ~ NA s NA ~ NA I NA s NA SPEC: NA s DEMOS NA s s sZONE NO.: SC261145 s s s
~ SUBNERGENCE: NA ~ DOCUMENT
REFERENCE:
NOTES: 1 ~ FOR COMPLETE ENVIRONNENTAL CON DITIONS, s SEE THE DOCUMENT REFERENCED. s sSPRAY: NA I 1. EQUIPNENT QUALIFICATION ENVIRONNENTAL DESIGN CRITERIA, EQEDC-1, REV 1, NAY 2, 1984 ~ 2.NORMAL TENPERATURES ARE SHOWN AS sEQUIPMENT NOT SUBJECT TO s 2. VENDOR ENVIRONNENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT, MAX DESIGN/AVERAGE.
~ SUBMERGENCE OR SPRAY. SDDF ¹ IEEE-07. 144-5000A s
s s 3. EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY TINE DATA SHEET: FILE NO. 22-1-C3
~ DOCUMENTATION ACCEPTABILITY: I 4'. CALCULATION NO. 12177-PR (C) 0 eACCEPTABLE TO NUREG 0588,CAT ~ ~
s I NAINT/SURVE ILL s s
~ ~
I
REFERENCE:
NA ~
~
s s IQUALIFIED LIFE (YEARS): 10
REFERENCE:
2 s s
~ ~
s ~ s ~
~ ~ ~ ~
s s s ~ s ~ s ~
NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NUMBER 50-410 SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 QUAL REF ll C071ABJ REV 0 20-Mar-85
* ~~ ~I ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND QUALIFICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ~ ~ ~
I s DOCUMENT REFERENCE I PARAMETER l SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED ~ s QUAL l MARGIN I REMARKS VALUE VALUE l SPECIFIED I QUALIFIED I METHOD l DEMO s
~ s ~ ~ I I ~I~ I I EQUIP NO.: 2HVRssTIS38A ~ ~ ~ I I ~
SPEC NO.: C071A l I OP. TIME: ~ 100 DAYS a >100 DAYS I 3 I 2 l TEST-SIM ~ YES e s I I REACTOR BUILDINGI TEMP (F) I ~ NOTE 1 I SYSTEM: ~ ~ s
~ s ~
VENTILATION ~ NORMAL I 104/85 s 120 l 1 s 2 l TEST-8 I M s NA l NOTE 2 s ABNORMALs 85 s 120 ~ 1 I 2 l TEST-SIM I NA a I TYPE: (DESCRIPTION) ~ ACCIDENT I NA I 255 e 1 s 2 l TEST-SIM s YES s TEMPERATURE SWITCH 'PRESS(PSIG) ' NOTE 1 I I NORMAL s ATMQS s ATMOS I 1 s 2 s TEST-8IM I NA I I a ABNORMALI ATMOS l ATMOS I 1 s 2 ~ TEST-8 I M s NA s l MANUFACTURER: UNITED ELECTRIC s s ACCIDENT I NA s 18 I 1 I 2 s TESTSIM l YES I I c /s ~ I ~ I NOTE 1 lMODEL NO.: 802P-SAS s NORMAL l 50 I 59 ~
'1 I 2 ~ TEST-SIM I NA s I
I I ABNQRMALs 50 l 59 s 1 s 2 ~ TEST-SIM s NA 100 2 TEST SIM NA ~ SAFETYFUNCTION: START UNIT COOLER UPON s ACCIDENT I
'ADIATION '
NA I s 1 l I I l s
- I NOTE 1 I REACHING HIGH TEMPERATURE NORM GAMMAs 2.67E3 I}}