ML17054A555

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Request for Addl Info to Complete Review of Draft SER Re pressure-temp Limit Curves to Comply W/Explicit Closure Flange Matl Temp Requirements of 10CFR,App G.Info Should Be Submitted as FSAR Amend No Later than 840515
ML17054A555
Person / Time
Site: Nine Mile Point Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 03/06/1984
From: Schwencer A
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Rhode G
NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORP.
References
NUDOCS 8403270314
Download: ML17054A555 (8)


Text

i Docket No.:

50-410

'r.

Gerald K. Rhode Senior Vice President Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation 300 Erie Boulevard West

Syracuse, New York 13202

Dear Mr. Rhode:

March 6, 1984

.. D'ISTR IBUTION:

i'ocument Control PIRC PDR L

PDR NSIC PRC LB¹2 File EHylton MHaughey Region I

EJordan, IE
NGrace, IE Bordenick, ELD ACRS (16)

Subject:

Request for Additional Information Concerning Nine Mile Point 2

(NMP-2)

In the process of reviewing information submitted to date for NMP-2 in preparation for the Draft SER, additional information needed to complete our review has been identified in the area of materials.

The additional information needed is identified in Enclosure 1 to this letter.

In order to meet the present licensing schedule for NMP-2, this information is required to be submitted as an amendment to the FSAR no later than May 15, 1984.

If you have any questions concerning the above information, please contact the licensing project manager, Nary Haughey, at (301) 492-7897.

Sincerely,

Enclosure:

As stated QWokosl afgaed bye A. Schwencer, Chief Licensing Branch No.

2 Division of Licensing cc w/ enclosure:

See next page DL: LB NFHaughey:pt 3/P/84 DL.L ¹2/BC ASchwencer 3/P /84

'4032703i'4. 840306.

'PDR- 'ADOCK""050004i0, E

PDR'

4 1

h II

Nine Mile Point 2 Mr. Gerald K. Rhode Senior Vice President Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation 300 Erie Boulevard West

Syracuse, New York 13202 CC:

Mr. Troy B. Conner, Jr.,

Esq.

Conner 8 Wetterhahn Suite 1050 1747 Pennsylvania

Avenue, N.W.

Washington, D.

C.

20006 Mr. Richard Goldsmith Syracuse Uni versi ty College of Law E. I. ophite Hall Campus

Syracuse, New York 13210 Mr. Jay Dunkleberger, Director Technological Development Programs New York State Energy Office Agency Building 2 Empire State Plaza
Albany, New York 12223 Ezra I. Bialik Assistant Attorney General Environmental Protection Bureau New York State Department of Law 2 World Trade Center New York, New York 10047 Resident Inspector Nine Mile Point Nuclear Power Station P. 0. Box 99
Lycoming, New York 13093 Mr. John W. Keib, Esq.

Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation 300 Erie Boulevard West

Syracuse, New York 13202 Jay M. Gutierrez, Esq.

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region I 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia.

Pennsylvania 19406

REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 251.<

Provide pressure temperature limit curves that comply with the explicit closure flange material temperature requirements of the amended (May 27, 1983) Appendix G, 10 CFR 50, or Provide the analysis that shows that the closure flange region is less limiting than the beltline region.

Include as a minimum the following information:

a.

A description of the finite element analysis used to determine the stresses within the closure flange region.

b.

Indicate the peak bolt-up, pressure, and thermal stresses determined by the finite element analysis at the inside and outside surface locations of the flange to head and flange to shell junctions.

c.

Indicate how the bolt-up, pressure, and thermal stresses were combined to determine the maximum applied stress intensity factors.

d.

Indicate the flaw geometry used to calculate the maximum applied stress intensity factors.

e.

Indicate the maximum applied stress intensity factors for the flange to head and flange to shell junctions.

NINE MILE PT 2

g1

is@

~

~

f.

Indicate the nondestructive examination methods that will be used during inservice examination to determine that the critical flaw

size, which was used in determining the maximum applied stress intensity factors, is not within the flange to head and flange to shell junctions.

g.

Indicate whether the nondestructive examination methods identified in (f) have been evaluated to demonstrate that the examination methods are capable of locating and sizing flaws of the geometry used for calculating the maximum applied stress intensity factors.

Indicate the results of the evaluation.

251.5 Provide the lead factors for each surveillance capsule.

251.6 Provide revised pressure-temperature curves that allow for an increase in the RTNDT which will represent the predicted radiation damage for the affected time period of the curves.

NINE MILE PT 2

r