ML17054A063

Forwards Requests for Addl Info Re Environ Rept Sections on Dewatering Sys,Radiological Consequences & Disposal of Wastes.Responses Should Be Submitted as Changes to FSAR by 831021

ML17054A063
Person / Time
Site:	Nine Mile Point
Issue date:	08/30/1983
From:	Schwencer A Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Rhode G NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORP.
References
NUDOCS 8309080188
Download: ML17054A063 (10)

Text

Docket No.:

50-410 CHickey PUFFS(i( )

0 ISTRIBUTION:

AUG 3 D 1983 (Document Controls NRC PDR Local PDR NSIC PRC LB82 Fil'e EHylton Mr. Gerald K. Rhode MHaughey Senior Yice President Region I Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation ELJo'rdan, DE(A:IE 300 Erie Oaulevard West Jh1Taylor, DRP:IE

Syracuse, New York 13202 Bordenick, OELD RWescott

Dear Mr. Rhode:

PEasley RSamworth

Subject:

Nine hlile Point 2

OL Environmental Review - Requests for Additional Information We have completed our initial review of the accident analysis, hydrologic engineering, and aquatic resources sections in the Nine hiile Point (2)

Environmental Report and have identified additional information required for our review in Enclosures 1,

2r and 3,~ respectively.

As discussed in our letter of August 19, 1983, additional requests for information concerning the Environmental Report will be transmitted to you as we complete our reviews of the remaining sections.

We are taking this approach in order to allow the maximum time for you to respond to our questions.

Consistent with the licensing review schedule for Nine Mile Point 2

responses to these requests for additional information should be submitted as changes to the FSAR by October 21, 1983.

If you have any questions concerning the enclosed requests for additional information please call the licensing project(manager, Mary F. Haughey, at (301) 492-7897.

Sincerely,

Enclosures:

As stated 4<081 op~0(r ~,

A. Schwencer, Chief Licensing Branch No.

2 Division of Licensing cc:

See next page BSO9080<si SSOSiO PDR ADOCK 050004i0

)

C PDR OFFICE/

SURNAME/

DATE 5 DL:LB

/PM DL:

BC h1Haughey:pt S/3Pj83........

~ o ~

~ o ~ ~ ~ o

~

~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o

~ o ~ ~

~

ASchwencer

~ o ~ o ~ oo ~ o ~ o ~ o ~ ~ o ~ o ~ ~

8/Fo'o/o83 ooooooo ~ ~

~ ~ ~ ~

o ~

NRC FORM 318 u0-80) NRCM 0240 OFF I CIA L R ECOR D COPY USOPO: 1981~o9(0

1&

pg l

J

(. !

Nine Mile Point 2

Mr. Gerald K. Rhode Senior Vice President Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation 300 Erie Boulevard West

Syracuse, New York 13202 CC:

Mr. Troy B. Conner, Jr.,

Esq.

Conner 8 Wetterhahn Suite 1050 1747 Pennsylvania

Avenue, N.W.

Washington, D. C.

20006 Mr. Richard Goldsmith Syracuse University College'f Law E. I. White Hall Campus

Syracuse, New York 13210 Mr. Jay Dunkleberger, Director Technological Development Programs New York State Energy Office Agency Building 2 Empire State Plaza

Albany, New York 12223 Ezra I. Bialik Assistant Attorney General Environmental Protection Bureau New York State Department of Law 2 World Trade Center New York, New York 10047 Resident Inspector Nine Mile Point Nuclear Power Station P; 0.

Box 126

Lycoming, New York 13093 Mr. John W. Keib, Esq.

Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation 300 Erie Boulevard West

Syracuse, New York 13202

i~

0 g r

E SURE 1

HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING SECTION ENVIRONMENTAL AND HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING BRANCH ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW QUESTIONS NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 DOCKET NO. 50-410 E240. (1 8>

(ER 2.',3. 2. 2)

In section 2.4.13.2 of the FSAR the zone of influence of the de-watering system is estimated to be two miles under worst case

, conditions.

Provide in more detail the assumptions and calcu-lations employed to arrive at this estimate.

Also provide an estimate of the maximum induced groundwater level change out-side of the NMPC or PASNY property boundaries.

0

EN SURE 2

NINE NILE POINT UNIT 2 ENVIRONNENTAL REPORT DOCKET NO. 50-410

. ~Radiological Consequences of Accidents Review 450-4 Table 7A.6-9 appears to have incorrectly numbered references.

Also, the significance of the comparisons made are not clear.

It appears that different types of risk (individual and total) are being compared.

Clarify this.

t Aquatic Resources Nine Hile Point Unit 2 OL Review Request for Additional Information ENCLOSURE 3

Provide all data in your possession on the concentration of NIREX in the adjacent waters or sediments of Lake Ontario.

Oescribe procedures for disposal of pre-operational cleaning solution wastes.

~ ~~~

~

~