ML17053D870
| ML17053D870 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Nine Mile Point  |
| Issue date: | 06/24/1983 |
| From: | Haughey M Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8307060425 | |
| Download: ML17053D870 (32) | |
Text
pP JUN 24 1983 P ISTRIBUTXON".
See next page Docket No.:
50-410 APPLICANT:
Niagara tfohawk Power Corporation (tlt<PC)
FACILITY:
Nine Mile Point-2
SUBJECT:
SUtNARY OF CASELOAD FORECAST PANEL (CFP)
MEETINGS ANO FACILITY TOUR AT tlINE NILE POINT February 22 - 24, 1983 SUHMARY On February 22 - 24, 1983, the NRC Caseload Forecast Panel (CFP), consisting of Ilillfam Lovelace (Rth/DNI), Nary Haughey (Licensing Project Manager) and Robert Schulz (Sr. Resident Inspector),
met with the applicant and toured the tline tkile Point-2 facility and site.
The purpose of these meetings and tour was to review construction progress and collect data for the purpose of assisting the NRC staff in estimating its resource needs for licensing activities for Nine Mile Point 2.
The visit was organized in two parts:
l.
On February 22, a meeting was held with the applicant to review design and engineering, procurement, and construction progress on Nine Nile Point-2.
2.
On February 23, a tour of the Wine Nile Point-2 facility and site was made to observe the status of construction.
The CFP also held brief discussions with the applicant on February 23 and 24 concerning questions raised during the meeting and tour.
On February 24, a close-out meeting was held.
The CFP stated that, based on the percentage of completion of such things as concrete, pipe hangers, and
- cable, as determined from information provided from the applicant and from the facilfty tour, the applicant's projected construction completion date of late February 1986 appeared to be very optimistic.
The data upon which the CFP projection is based is given in the following sections of the meeting summary.
Although the CFP believed the February 1986 construction completion date was very optimistic, Nine Nile Point 2 fs still approximately three years from construction completion and construction completion estimates within a few months are still uncertain.
For this reason it was agreed, for the present, that the licensing schedule would be based on the applicant's scheduled completion date.
It was further agreed that another Caseload Forecast Panel visit would be made in the spring of 1984 to reassess the applicant's progress in meeting the February 1986 completion date.
OFFICE/
EURNAMEf DATEP 8307060425 830624 PDR ADOCK OS000410 PDR NRC FORM 318 (10-80) NRCM 0240 QFFICIAL RECORD COPY USOPO: 1981 835.960
l1 ~
4 l
t J
I
MEETING AND FACILITY TOUR DETAILS
- Tuesday, February 22, 1983, at Nine Nile Point-2 Scriba, Hew York.
The CFP met with the applicant at the NMPC offices on the Nine IHle Point-2 site.
A list of attendees is included as Attachment 1.
The applicant's presentation to the staff was supplied in eleven segments corresponding to the eleven items in the Caseload Forecast Panel Site Visit Meeting Agenda (Attachment 2) which was included in the meeting notice.
The Nt<PC presentation included a general over view of project construction, major milestones, and current and anticipated problems.
As of January 31, 1983, construction percent complete was reported by NYPC as 61.59%.
In 1982, 22.56% construction completion was planned; 23.4%
was achieved.
Current problems include:
1.
contractor performance affecting schedule, notably the mechanical/
piping contractor.
2.
limited engineering lead time to construction.
Future potential schedular problems include:
1) power generation control complex (PGCC) modifications 2) contractor performance, notably the major mechanical contractor 3) equipment qualification concerns 4) control rod drive system schedule 5) craft availability, notably welders 6)
= conversion from bulk basis project to a system based construction IIajor construction milestones completed in 1982 were:
1) set spent fuel pool liner 2) complete set spent fuel pool liner 3) cooling tower shell complete 4) intake and discharge tunnels complete OFFICE/
SURNAMEII DATE0
~
NRC FORM 318 (10-80) NRCM 0240
~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ OO ~ 0 ~I OFFICIAL RECORD COPY USQPO1 1981~980
4
~
'J
'I~,
I>
4
Major construction milestones scheduled for 1983 are:
1) 115V switchyard ready to energize 2) cable trays 80% complete 3) set main PGCC console 4) large process pipe 80% complete (hang in place, tacked in place) 5)
polar crane operational 6) diesel generator building enclosure 7) screenwell building enclosure complete 8) cooling tower complete 9) reactor building enclosure complete 10) walsh concrete 98% complete The status of bulk quantities installed is indicated in Attachment 3.
The method uses by HHPC for determining partial credit for installation is indicated in Attachment 4.
Engineering and design efforts were estimated by NNPC to be about 82% complete at the end of 1982.
Engineering milestones completed in 1982 were a) complete screenwall structural drawings and, b) complete reactor building concrete and steel drawings.
A project restraint file was made available to the CFP for review.
This file listed equipment need dates and status of delivery as of February 21, 1983.
This list indicated 3 equipment areas are experiencing short term delivery problems of 1 to 3 months.
The bulk of the equipment indicated on-site need dates in 1983.
NHPC noted a large craft work force is available in the Oswego area and craft workers are often used from the Nine Iiile Point, Unit 1 and Fitzpatrick plants.
The availability of qualified welders however was indicated as a continuing problem.
The Nine Nile Point-2 project has recently undergone a major schedule revision to evaluate the potential for improving the fuel load date.
Present
.NNPC schedules are targeted for an August 1985 early fuel load date.
Critical path items for each area were identified by NNPC.
These items have float times (extra time available for contingencies before impacting the schedule) of between zero to 4 weeks before impacting the August 1985 fuel load date.
This schedule allows little or no time for unexpected contingencies.
An extra six month period is built into the total project float time, however, when con-OFFICE/
SURNAME/
DATEP
/'"
~~FOAM 318 [1040) NRCM 0240 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY US0 PO: 19S 1-335-960
0 e
1
Separate float is identified in Nine Nile Point-2 schedules for engineering, construction, and test and startup.
Items are considered negative when they exhaust the float in any one of these
- areas, not the total project float.
This system calls attention to schedule problems before they impact the total project.
Of the 1213 pre-op and acceptance test procedures identified by NMPC as required for fuel load, 263 were identified as approved, 81 in review, 286 started, and 583 not yet started.
(The number of procedures required in the areas of In Service Inspection, Operations Surveillance and Preventive Maintenance, Start-up Tests and Special Operating Procedures have not yet been identified and are not included in this total).
A total of 300 workers were identified by NMPC as required resources for the Pre-op and Acceptance Tests Program.
Of these, 125 are already employed by NMPC. It was indicated by NMPC that the remaining personnel (mainly in the operating, technician, and test engineer categories) could be drawn from the pool of workers in the Oswego area presently working at Nine Mile Point, Unit 1 and Fitzpatrick.
Wednesday, Februar 23 l983, at Nine Mile Point-2 The CFP toured the Nine Mile Point-2 site on Wednesday to observe the'tatus of construction.
Among the areas observed were the containment building
( including the drywell and suppression pool), the turbine building, the control room building, the radwaste building, the diesel generator building, and the refueling area.
A brief meeting was held after the tour to discuss additional information necessary for the NRC staff to make its estimate of the Nine Mile Point-2 fuel load date.
Thursda
, February 24, 1983, at Nine Mile Point-2 A brief meeting was held with the applicant on Thursday morning to obtain the additional information requested by the NRC staff.
At 10:30 Thursday morning, a
summary meeting was held with the applicant.
The attendance list for this meeting is included in Attachment 1.
At this meeting, the applicant was advised by the CFP that the applicant's official scheduled construction completion date of February
- 1986, appeared very optimistic.
Discussion of a licensing review schedule was deferred pending further evaluation by, NRC staff management.
Attachments:
As stated M. Haughey, Project Manager Licensing Branch No. 2 Division of Licensing
- SEE ATTACHED PAGES FOR PREVIOUS CONCURRENCES OFFICEI SURNAME/
DATE Q DL'B¹2/Ptl" MH'augh ey-opt' e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ oo ~ o ~ ~ o ~ e ~ ~ ~ ~ e ~ e 3/ 1 6/83
~
e
~j~ ~
~ ~ e ~
~ ~ ~
4p DL:LB¹2/BC%'chw'eiicer-5/10/83 RM/DMI*
HL'ov'el'ace'"
5/10/83 DEP:DIR/PM" NSc'r'og gran's'"
eo ~ e e O e ~ e e e e ~ e ~ e ~ ~ e ~\\ ~
6r6/83 DL:AD/
~
ceo ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~
~
~ oo ~ ~ ~
TNovak
~ eeeeoooee
~ eooooooooooeoo 8/R"/83 NRG FORM 318 (10-80) NRCM 40 OFF IClALRECORD COPY USGPO: 19S1~960
0 4
Separate float is identified in Nine l1ile Point-2 schedules for engineering, constru tion, and test and startup.
Items are considered negative when they exhaust e float in any one of these
- areas, not the total project float.
This syste calls attention to schedule problems before they impact the total project.
Of the 1213 pre-o and acceptance test procedures identified by Ht<PC as required for fuel load, 263 ere identified as approved, 81 in review, 286 started, and "583 not yet started.
(The number of procedures required in the areas of In Service Inspection, Operations Surveillance and preventive Ijalntenance, Start-up Tests and Special Opera ng Procedures have not yet been identified and are not included in this total).
A total of 300 workers were iden fied by HMPC as required resources for the Pre-op and Acceptance Tests Progra Of these, 125 are already employed by Ht<PG. It was indicated by HMPG that he remaining personnel (mainly in the operating, technician, and test enqine r categories) could be drawn from the pool of workers in the -Oswego area pr sently working at Nine Iiile Point, Unit 1 and Fitzpatrick.
Mednesday, February 23, 1983, at Nine Mile Po nt-2 The CFP toured the Nine Mile Point-2 site on Wed esday to observe the status-of construction.
Among the areas observed were t containment building (including the drywell and suppression pool), the t rbine building, the control room building, the radwaste building, the diesel gen rator building, and the refueling area.
A brief meeting was held after the tour to discuss addi ional information necessary for the NRG staff to make its estimate of the ine tlile Point-2 fuel load date.
- Thursday, February 24, 1983, at Nine Mile Point-2 A brief meeting was held with the applicant on Thursday morn ng to obtain the additional information requested by the HRG staff.
At 10:30 hursday morning, a summary meeting was held with the applicant.
The attendanc list for this meeting is included in Attachment 1.
At this meeting, the app icant was advised by the CFP that the applicant's official scheduled constructio completion date of February
- 1986, appeared optimistic and completion in the 4th quarter of 1986 appeared more likely.
Discussion of a licensing review schedule was deferred pending further evaluation by NRC staff management.
I Attachments:
As stated II. Haughey, Project Manager Licensing Branch Ho. 2 Division of Licensing
- SEE ATIIUCPO PAGE P
R PREVIOUS CONCURRERCES OFFICE/
SURNAME/
DATE t/
cc:
See nex page NRC FORM 318 (10-80) NRCM 0240 "DL:LB¹2(Pt1 NHaughey:pt
'.j8 taljg/83 3/16(83 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY D:
R/Rth RS 9gins
/gj'83
- D AD(L vak 3/21/83 USGPO: 198 IM35.980
"~ i'
~
0-Separate float is identified in Nine Nile Point-2 schedules for engineering, construction, and test and startup.
Items are considered negative when they exhaust the float in any one of these
- areas, not the total project float.
This system calls attention to schedule problems before they impact the total project.
Of the 1213 pre-op and acceptance test procedures identified by NNPC as required for fuel load, 263 were identified as approved, 81 in review, 286 started, and 583 not yet started.
(The number of procedures required in the areas of In Service Inspection, Operations Surveillance and Preventive Naintenance, Start-up Tests and Special Operating Procedures have not yet been identified and are not included in this total).
A total of 300 workers were identified by NHPC as required resources for the Pre-op and Acceptance Tests Program:
of these, 125 are already employed by HI<PC. It was indicated by NHPC that the remaining personnel (mainly in the operating, technician, and test engineer categories) could be drawn from the pool of workers in the Oswego area presently working at Nine Nile Point, Unit 1 and Fitzpatrick.
Wednesday, February 23, 1983, at Nine Nile Point-2 The CFP toured the Nine tlile Point-2 site on Wednesday to observe the status of construction.
Among the areas observed were the containment building (including the drywell and suppression pool), the turbine building, the control room building, the radwaste building, the diesel generator building, and the refueling area.
A brief meeting was held after the tour to discuss additional information necessary for the NRC staff to make its estimate of the Nine Nile Point-2 fuel load date.
- Thursday, February 24, 1983, at Nine Mile Point-2 A brief meeting was held with the applicant on Thursday morning to obtain the additional information requested by the NRC staff.
At 10:30 Thursday morning, a
summary meeting was held with the applicant.
The attendance list for this meeting is included in Attachment 1.
At this meeting, the applicant was advised that, the CFP estimated date that the plant will be. ready for fuel load is 4th quarter 1986, nominally late November 1986.
0>anginal Signog by:
II. Haughey, Project Manager Licensing Branch No.
2 Division of Licensing Attachments:
As stated cc:
See nex page OFFICEI3 SURNAME$
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~
~
~
DATEp
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~
~
3/ ~(/83
~ 0 ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
3//4/83 DL:LB¹ /PII DL'2/BC MHaughey:pt AS hwencer RI1/DNI M '"'
3/jE/83 D
AD 3//I.g/83 NRC FORM 318 (10-80) NRCM 0240 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY USGPO: 'l981~9 980
0 0
Nine Nile Point 2 Mr. Gerald K. Rhode Vice Pres'ident, System Project Management Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation 300 Erie Bouleva'rd West
- Syracuse, New York 13202 cc'.
Mr.'"troy B. Conner, Qr.'., Esq.
Conner.8 Wetterhahn 1747 Pennsylvania
- Avenue, N.W.
- Washington, 'D.,C.
20006 Mr. Richard.Goldsmith
.Syracuse Universi.ty College of Law
,E.,I.. White. Hall Campus Syracuse,,
Hew York
.l3210 T. 'K. 'DeBoer, Director Technological 'Development':Programs Hew York State Energy Office Agency Building 2 Empire State Plaza
- Albany, New York 12223 Ezra I. Bialik Assistant Attorney General Environmental Protection Bureau New York State Department of Law 2 Wor'ld Trade Center Hew York, Hew York 10047 Resident Inspector Nine Nile Point Nuclear Power Station P. 0.
Box 126 Lycoming, -Hew York 13093 Mr. John W.. Keib., Esq.
Hiagara Mohawk Power Corporation 300 Erie Boulevard West
- Syracuse, Hew York 13202
0 ATTACHMENT 1 ATTENDANCE LIST
. CASELOAD FORECAST PANEL MEETINGS
. (2/22 24/83)
NAME Mary F,. Haughey W.'. Lovelace Paul D.
Eddy (2/22.and 2/24 only)
Jw~
- f. M. Sheldon J.
B.
Hadden
.N. L. Rademacker R.
H. Pinney
'D.'L. Pike (2/22 only)
R.
J..
Cohen R.
B;. Abbott.
Robert D. Schulz S.
F.
Manno (2/24.only)
Q. McGrath '(2/24 only)
ORGANIZATJON NRC - Licensing Project..Man..
NRC RM
'NYS - )PSC JRPX -~censina Stone 8 Webster - Construction NMPC -
AMC
'NMPC - Licensing Stone
& Webster -,Licensing
.NMPC - Engineering NMPC - Scheduling NMPC - OPRNS NRC - Sr.
Res. 'Inspector NMPC V. 'P. Nuclear Construction NYS PSC
2.
3.
ATTACHMENT 2 SELOAD FORECAST PANEL SLTE YJSIT MEET1NG AGENDA,~
Overview of project construction schedule including progress and major milestones completed, current probl'ems and any anticipated problem areas that may impact the current projected fuel load date.
Detailed revive and current status of design and engineering effort (by major discipline) including"any potential prob'Iems..
that may arise from necessary rework.
Detailed review artd current. status xf procurement activities including valves, pipe, instruments, cable, major components,
~
CLlvs 4.
Actual and proposed craft, work forage (by. major.craft),.craft availabil ty productivity, potential labor negotiations;and probl ems..
5 Detai1ed review and current status wf all larae.and small bore pipe hangers, restraints, snubbers.,
etc
., including desi~,
~.
rework, procurement, fabrication, delivery and installation.
.G.
Detailed review of project schedul,e identifying.critical.path itans,'near critical items, atraunt of float for various activities, the current critical path to fuel loading, methods of implementation of corrective action for any th ne'oative fIoat, and provisions for contingencies.
activities wi n'.January 31, 1983."
The estimated project percent complete as of 1
d w and current status of bulk quantities including
. current estimated. quantities, quantities installed to date, uantities scheduled to date, current percent complete for
~
t 1
s forecast installation rates, in cubic yards/nn.',
~
- each, actua versus
~
linear. feet/na., or number/mo.,
and basis for figures.
(a)
Concrete (CY)
(b)
Process Pipe (LF)
Large Bore Pipe (2 1/2" and larper)
Small Bore Pipe (2" and smaller)
{c)
Yard Pipe (LF)
(d)
Large Bore Pipe Hang rs, Restraints, Snubbers
{ea)
~
h
~ ~
~0
~ ~
~
~
~
~
~
~.0
~
~
0
~
~
~
~
~
~ ~
~
Power Control Security instrumentation Plant Lighting (k} Electr ical Circuits (ea}
Power Control
~
~
~
~
~
~
(e)
Small Bore Pipe Hangers, Restraints'(ea)
(f)
Cable Tray (LF) '-
r
~ '
~
'I (g)
Total Conduit (LF)
~
~
(h)
Total Exposed Petal". Conduit LFQ (i)
Cable (LF)
~
~
Power Control Security
. instrumentation Plant-Lighting (j}..Terminations -(ea).'
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
4 S
N ~
~
'4
~ o
~ ~
s
~
~
~
Secur> ty (1) instrumentation (ea)
B.
. Detailed review and current status of preparation of preop and acceptance test procedures, integration of preop and acceptance test activities with construction schedule, system turnover schedule, preop and acceptance tests schedule, current and proposed preop and acceptance tests prooram manpower.'a)
Total number of procedures required for fuel load.
(b)
Number of draft procedures not started.
(c)
Number of draft procedures being written.
(d)
Number of procedures approved.
. {e)
Number of proc dures in review.
(f) Total number of preoo and acceptance tests required for fue1 load.
(g)
Number of preop and acceptance tests"completed.
(h}
Number of preop and acceptance tests currently
. in progress.
(i)
Numoer of systems turned over to start-up..
0
0 Detai1ed discussion of potentia1 schedu1ar.
influence due to changes a<tributed to NUREG-0737 and other recent 1icensjng require'ments.
~
~
~
~
16.. Discussion of schedu1ar impact. if any, regaiding potentia1 deficiencies reported in accordance with IO CFR 50.55(e).
T1.
Overview of current construction" and:startup management organization:showing interfaces between the two.
'IZ.
'Site tour:and observation'f construction,activi tTes.
o J
4
~
~
NINE MILE POINT NUCLEAR STATIOIl - UNIT 2 CONSTRUCTION INDICATORS DESCRIPTIOM Reinforcing Steel Formwork Concrete Structural Steel Large Bore Pipe Large Bore Welds Large Bore Hangers Small Bore Pipe Conduit and Supports Cable Tray Cable (Pwr, Instr,Cntrl)
Cable Terminations UOM TN SF CY TN LF EA EA IF LF LF EA I/I/83 REVISED BUDGET ESTIMATE 37,676 3 079 125 261,262 20,282 246,332 18,669 16,974 159,982 619,600 126,235 5,758,541 256,917 ACTUAL INSTALLED AS OF I/16/83 31,787 2,584,320 221,317 15,816 I49>994 II,I74 6,814 23,940 312,599 81,897 600,067 78 INSTALLED AS OF I/16/83 84 84 85 78 61 60 40 15 50 65 10 0
o C
~
~ J J.
O. No. 12]87 PERCENTAGES AND CRITERIA FOR REPORTING PARTIAL CREDIT FOR LARGE BORE HANGER QUANTITIES INTO TIK PPR bl'.Status of Han er X Credit Progress Values Incremental/Cumulative..
Loaded in building
.10 /
.10
.Start Erection
.25 /
.35 A.
Permanent a'ttachment made (hanger committed).
,Erection 'in P.rogress (1)
.'30 /
. 65 D.
Tempora ry Permanent,.
All p.. ts.installed ) no pressure boundary we3.ds made.
All hanger parts installed except suppressors.
Hanger incomplete but will support pipe.
Erection Complete (2)
.30 /
.95 A.
All parts instal'led.
B.
All structure welding complete.
C.
All pressure boundary welding complete.
Accepted (2)
.05
/ 1.00 A.
Corrstruction turnover operations co.:;pleted (hot/cold set complete; QC accepted).
One or more conditions must be met to claim credit.
(1)
AI1 r orrdit.ions:,r:st be rant. to claim credit.
(2)
~ J,"0:
No.
12187 PERCENTAGES AND CRITERIA FOR REPORTING PARTIAL CREDIT FOR LARGE BORE HANGER QUANTITIES INTO THE PPR Status of Pipe Spool Loaded in building Hung i n pos'i t ion,(R imaged)
Ready to weld X Credit XX
'XXX Progress Values I nc remen ta 1 /Cummu1 at ive
.15 /
.15
..45 /,.60
.40 / 1.00 PERCENTAGES AND CRITERIA FOR REPORTING PARTIAL CREDIT
. FOR LARGE BORE VALVE QUANTITIES 'INTO THE PPR S",.atus of Pipe.'Spool Loaded
.in 'bu'i'l,ding Hung in Pos i t'ion
'(R igged)-
Ready to weld (Const.
Accept)
- X Credit XX XXX Progress Values Incremental/Cummlative
/
.60
.40 / 1.00 PERCENTAGES AND CRITERIA FOR REPORTING PARTIAL.
CREDIT FOR LARGE BORE WELD QUANTITIES INTO THE PPR Status of Weld In Progress Comp ie'te 'E Ground Q.C Accepted X Credit XX XXX Progress Va1 ues Incremental
/Cummul at i ye
.40 /
.40
.45 /
.85
.15 / 1.00
J.
O. No.
12187 PERCENTAGES AND CRITERIA FOR REPORTING PARTIAL CREDIT FOR LARGE BORE HANGER QUANTITIES INTO THE PPR Status of Han er X Credit Progress Values Incremental/Cumulative
,Loaded in building
.lo /
..1'0
.Start. Erection
.25,/
.35 A.
Permanent attachment:made (hanger committed).
Erection in Progress (I)
.30 /
.65
'A.
Temporary -.Permanent.
B.
All -:parts in~tallcd,
.no pressure boundary welds made.
C.
All hanger parts installed 'except suppressors.
D.
Hanger incomplete but will support pipe-Erection Comolete (2)
-30 /
.95 A. All parts installed.
B.
All structure welding complete.
C.
All pressure boundary welding complete.
Acccphed (2)
.05
/ 1.00 Constructi.on turnover operations completed (hot/cold set complete; QC accepted).
One or more conditions must be abet to claim credit.
(1)
(2) Al'1 condit ons nus be rat to claim credit.
e
MEMO DATED:
JUN 24 1983 MEETING-
SUMMARY
-DISTRIBUTION:
0 NRC PDR Local PDR NSIC PRC LB82 File EHylton MHaughey Bordenick, OELD l<Lovelace OPA R. Schulz
e c