ML17053C479

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Violation from Insp on 801021-23 & 1104-06
ML17053C479
Person / Time
Site: Nine Mile Point Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 12/09/1980
From:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To:
Shared Package
ML17053C476 List:
References
50-410-80-11, NUDOCS 8103300013
Download: ML17053C479 (4)


Text

APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation Docket No. 50-410 This refers to the inspection conducted by a representative of the Region I (Philadelphia) office at the Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 2, Scriba, New York, of activities authorized by NRC License No.

CPPR-112.

During this inspection conducted on October 21-23 and November 4-6, 1980, the following apparent item of noncompliance was identified:

10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V, states in part, "Activities affect-ing quality shall'e accomplished in accordance with...instructions (and) procedures".

The Nine Mile Point Nuclear -Station, Unit 2 PSAR, Appendix D, Quality Assu-rance

Program, Paragraph D.2.2, states in part, "NMPC will require Stone and Webster Enginee} ing Corporation...

to maintain and implement separate but subsidiary Quality Assurance programs responsive to and designed to satisfy the intent of the Quality Assurance'ri'teria of"'Appendix B."

Project Procedure 16, Revi'sion 8, dated July 10, 1980 states in part, "After five E&DCRs and/or N&Ds have been written against a document, the following will apply:

Design drawings...will be revised (addended}

and reissued within 2 months of E&DCR and/or N&D Change No. 5." and "Whenever a...draw-ing...is being revised

('addended),

all E&DCRs written against the document that are outstanding up to the time the document revision enters final review shall be incorporated."..."All E&DCRs and addenda will be incorpo-rated to reflect the final as-built conditions...."

Quality Control Instruction 6.1 dated January 23, 1980 states in part, "FQC is responsible for closing and maintaining the status of E&DCRs that require inspection by FQC."

Contrary to the above, as of November 6, 1980 the following discrepancies and/or deficiencies in records and drawings existed.

1.

Five (5)

E&DCRs with closing dates in excess of the maximum time authorized by procedure had not been incorporated into Drawing Numbers 12177-EC-38A6 and 12177-EC-38C-7.

SXOSSOO 0>>

2.

Drawing Number 12177-EC-38A-4 does not reflect the as-built condition of the facility because ESDCR C10199 was incorrectly incorporated into the drawing.

3.

EIIDCR C10379 was still, open even though all work affected by the EIIDCR had been completed on Nay 30, 1978.

This item is an infraction.