ML16342C784

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Ack Receipt of Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-275/94-25 & 50-323/94-25
ML16342C784
Person / Time
Site: Diablo Canyon  Pacific Gas & Electric icon.png
Issue date: 12/27/1994
From: Gwynn T
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To: Rueger G
PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC CO.
References
NUDOCS 9501030046
Download: ML16342C784 (20)


See also: IR 05000275/1994025

Text

PRIORIT'Y Z

REGULATORYI~ftACC5lkPKMN'LSU'RmUTION SYSTEM

( RIDS )

'l ACCESSION NBR:9501030046

DOC.DATE: 94/12/27

NOTARIZED: NO

DOCKET

N

CIL:50-275 Diablo Canyon Nuclear

Power Plant, Unit 1, Pacific

Ga '5000275

50-323 Diablo Canyon Nuclear

Power Plant, Unit 2, Pacific

Ga

05000323

UTH.NAME

AUTHOR AFFILIATION

GWYNNiT.P.

Region

4 (Post

820201)

RECIP.NAME

RECIPIENT AFFILIATION

RUEGERiG.M.

Pacific Gas

& Electric Co.

SUBJECT:

Ack receipt of 941215 ltr informing NRC of steps

taken to

correct violations noted in insp repts

50-275/94-25

a

50-323/94-25.

DISTRIBUTION CODE:

IE01D

COPIES

RECEIVED:LTR

ENCL

SIZE:

TITLE: General

(50 Dkt)-Insp Rept/Notice of Violation Response

NOTES:

RECIPIENT

ID CODE/NAME

PD4-2

PD

COPIES

RECIPIENT

LTTR ENCL

ID CODE/NAME

1

1

PETERSONiS

COPIES

LTTR ENCL

1

1

INTERNAL: ACRS

AEOD/SPD/RAB

AEO~D~+~

FiI-LE CENTER

02

NRR/DRCH/HHFB

NUDOCS-ABSTRACT

OGC/HDS3

RNAL: LITCO BRYCE,J

H

NRC PDR

2

2

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

AEOD/DEIB

AEOD/SPD/RRAB

DEDRO

NRR/DORS/OEAB

NRR/PMAS/IRCB-E

OE DIR

RGN4

FILE

01

NOAC

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

YOTE TO ALL"RIDS"'RECIPIENTS:.

PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE! COYTACTTHE DOCUMENTCONTROL

DESK, ROOM Pl-37 (EXT. 504-20S3

) TO ELIMIYATEYOUR i4'AME FROXI

DISTRI8!..'TIOV. LISTS FOR DOCUh!EVTS YOU DOY'TFEED!

TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES

REQUIRED:

LTTR

20

ENCL

20

UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION IV

611 RYAN PLAZA DRIVE, SUITE 400

ARLINGTON,TEXAS 76011.6064

UtL

2 7 I95c!

Pacific

Gas

and Electric Company

Nuclear

Power Generation,

B14A

ATTN:

Gregory

M. Rueger,

Senior Vice

President

and General

Manager

Nuclear

Power Generation

Bus. Unit

77 Beale Street,

Room

1451

P.O.

Box 770000

San Francisco,

California

94177

SUBJECT:

NRC

INSPECTION

REPORT 50-275/94-25;

50-323/94-25

Thank you for your letter of December

15,

1994,

in response

to our

letter

and Notice of Violation dated

November

16,

1994.

We have reviewed your

reply and find it responsive

to the concerns

raised in our Notice of

Violation.

We will review the implementation of your corrective actions

~

~

during

a future inspection to determine that full compliance

has

been

achieved

and will be maintained.'ine

Dockets:

50-275

50-323

Licenses:

DPR-80

DPR-82

Thomas

.

wynd,

D

Division of

hact

r

to

af ty

CC;

Sierra

Club California

ATTN:

Dr. Richard

Ferguson

Energy Chair

6715

Rocky Canyon

Creston,

California

93432

9501030046 94l227

PDR

ADOCK 05000275

8

PDR

Pacific

Gas

and Electric Company

San Luis Obispo

Mothers for Peace

ATTN:

Ms. Nancy Culver

P.O.

Box 164

Pismo

Beach, California

93448

Ms. Jacquelyn

C. Wheeler

P.O.

Box 164

Pismo

Beach, California

93448

The County Telegram Tribune

ATTN:

Managing Editor

1321

Johnson

Avenue

P.O.

Box 112

San Luis Obispo, California

93406

San Luis Obispo County Board of

Supervisors

ATTN:

Chairman

Room 370

County Government

Center

San Luis Obispo, California

93408

California Public Utilities Commission

ATTN:

Mr. Truman Burns)Mr. Robert Kinosian

505

Van Ness,

Rm.

4102

San Francisco,

California

94102

Diablo Canyon, Independent

Safety Committee

Attn:

Robert

R. Wellington,

Esq.

Legal

Counsel

857

Cass Street,

Suite

D

Monterey, California

93940

Radiologic Health Branch

State

Department of Health Services

ATTN:

Mr. Steve

Hsu

P.O.

Box 942732

Sacramento,

California

94234

State of California

ATTN:

Mr. Peter

H. Kaufman

Deputy Attorney General

110 West

A Street,

Suite

700

San Diego, California

92101

Pacific

Gas

and Electric Company

Pacific

Gas

and Electric Company

ATTN:

Christopher J.

Warner,

Esq.

P.O.

Box 7442

San Francisco,

California

94120

Diablo Canyon Nuclear

Power Plant

ATTN:

John Townsend,

Vice President

and Plant Manager

P.O.

Box 56

Avila Beach, California

93424

Pacific

Gas

and Electric Company

E-Hail report to D. Sullivan

(DJS)

bcc to

DHB (IE01)ii

bcc distrib.

by RIV:

L. J. Callan

Resident

Inspector

DRSS-FIPB

HIS System

Branch Chief (DRP/E,

WCFO)

Senior Project Inspector

(DRP/E,

WCFO)

RIV File

Branch Chief (DRP/TSS)

Leah Tremper

(OC/LFDCB,

MS:

TWFN 9E10)

B. Henderson

(PAO,

WCFO)

DRS AI 94-116

DOCUMENT NAME:

R:It DC)DC4251t.lee

Tc receive copy of document, indicate inb x: "C" ~ Copy without enclosures

"E

~ Copy with e

losures "N" ~ No copy

RIV:RI:HB

C:HB

LEEllersha

APow

s

12

/94

12

94

D:DRS

TPGwyn

12~/94

D:D

ABB

ch

12/

/94

D:DRS

TPGwynn

12/

/94

Pacific

Gas

and Electric Company

E-Mail report to D. Sullivan

(DJS)

bcc to

DMB (IE01)

bcc distrib.

by RIV:

L. J. Callan

DRSS-F IPB

Branch Chief (DRP/E,

WCFO)

RIV File

Leah Tremper

(OC/LFDCB,

MS:

Resident

Inspector

MIS System

Senior Project Inspector

(DRP/E,

WCFO)

Branch Chief (DRP/TSS)

TWFN 9E10)

B. Henderson

(PAO,

WCFO)

DRS AI 94-116

DOCUMENT NAME:

R:g DC)DC425lt.lee

To receive copy of document, indicate inb x: "C" = Copy without enciosures

"E

~ Copy with e

losures "N" ~ No copy

RIV:RI:MB

C:MB

D:DRS

D:D

D:DRS

12

/94

12

94

LEEllersha

APowe

s

TPGwyn

12~/94

ABB

ch

12/

/94

TPGwynn

12/

/94

Pacific Gas ana Becttic Company,'7

Beagle Stteet

Ran Fta""ivn CA A4inr

41 SIB:"'66(

Gtegoty

.'A. Hveget

Sealant vice Ptesitle""(a"~c

Genetai Menag:t

Nv"'eat P~rr.t Geom'n

December 15, 1994

PGSE Letter DCL-94-282

I

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

ATIN: Document Control Desk

Washington, D.C. 20555

Docket No. 50-275, OL-DPR-80

Docket No. 50-323, OL-DPR-82

Diablo Canyon Units 1 and 2

Reply to Notice ofViolation in NRC Inspection

Report Nos. 50-275/94-25 and 50-323/94-25

C4entlemen:

NRC inspection Report Nos. 50-275/94-25 and 50-323/94-25, dated November

16, 1994, contained one Seventy Level )Vviolation regarding the failure to

adequateiy document a contaminated water spill and failure to provide adequate

instructions appropriate for the resistance temperature detector modification

project to preclude a contaminated water spill. PGRE's response to the Notice of

Violation is enclosed.

Sincerely,

tt,

ir. ~

I: ..

-j 'i-.

~~

Gregory M. Rueger

L. J. Callan

Mary Miller

Kenneth E. Perkins

Sheri R. Peterson

Diablo Distribution

Enclosure,

1265 S>DDh82237

28'd

272889K.TSTG

OJ.

88: CT

t66T~-33G

PGBE Letter DCL-94-282

ENCLOSURE 1

REPLY TO NOTICE OF VIOLATIONIN,

NRC INSPECTION REPORT NOS. 50-275IS4-2S AND 50-323/94-28

On November 16, 1994, as part of NRC Inspection Report Nos. 50-275/94-25 and

50-323/94-25, NRC Region IY issued one Severity Level IVviolation regarding the

failure to adequately document a contaminated water spill and failure to provide

adequate instructions appropriate for the resistance temperature detector modification

project to preclude a contaminated water spill. PG8 E's response to the Notice of

Violation is as follows:

DESCRIPTION bF THE VIOLATION

During an NRC inspection conducted on September 26 through October

.

7, with the in-office inspection through October 28, 1994, a violation of

NRC requirements was identified. In accordance with the "General

Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR 2, Appendix C, the violation is listed below:

Criterion V of Appendix 8 to 10 CFR Part 50 requires, in part, that

activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by documented instructions,

procedures, or drawings of a type appropriate to the circumstances,

and

shall be accomplished with these documented instructions, procedures, or

drawings.

Administrative Procedure OM7.ID1 requires the documentation of all

identified hardware-related or administrative problems relative to nuclear

'power generation activities, through the initiation of an action request, so

that the cause of the problems can be identiTied and actions developed to

ensure the problems do not happen again or to reduce the chance of the

problems recurring.

Contrary to the above:

A.

Documented Instructions were not appropriate to the

circumstances for the resistance temperature detector

modification project on Unit 2, ln that they did not provide

adequate measures for controlling or containing reactor

coolant system water that spilled out of the Loop 1 hot leg

during machining operations on October 5, 1994, during

Refueling Outage 2R6. (A similar event occurred in Unit 1,

during Refueling Outage 1R6).

G3'd

ZT28e9K TST6

OL

@md

ee:cv

t est-ez-vza

0

xn

B.

An action request to document a problem was not initiated

during Refueling Outage 1R6 (between March 12 and May

7, 1994) to identify the cause of a reactor coolant system

water spill during the resistance temperature detector

modification project on Unit 1, and to dsvolop actions to

ensure that the problem did not recur.

This is a Severity Level IVviolation (Supplement

1).

REASON FOR THE VIOLATIOM

PG&E agrees with the violation as stated in the inspection Report.

During the Unit 1 sixth refueling outage (1R6) and the Unit 2 sixth refueling outage

(2R6), the resistance thermal detector (RTD) bypass piping network was removed and

new RTD thermowells were installed.

Due to the multidiscipline impact of this project,

PG&E initiated a high impact team (HIT)to review the scope ofwork, scheduling and

support functions required by each of the various work groups involved.

During the 1R6 project a large drip bag (approximately six foot diameter) was utilized to

control the anticipated water flowand drainage that might result from metal

disintegration machining (MDM)process from the reactor coolant system breach.

Protective clothing precautions were specified to protect personnel from possible

contamination due to the potential exposure to contaminated water. The drip bag was

effective in containing the water during the system breach; however, due to the

scaffolding and MDMequipment configuration, the drip bag was required to be moved

when the MDMequipment was removed, resulting in a smail liquid spill (estimated 15

gallons) when the drip bag was pushed aside.

The spill was promptly controlled by

radiation protection (RP) personnel and no personnel contamination resulted.

The 1R6 experience was evaluated by the HITteam members for improvement ofthe

2R6 work activities. The HIT team recommendations

included, the use of the electro-

discharge machining (EDM) equipment Instead ofthe MDMequipment forthe system

breach, scaffolding configuration changes and a smaller (approximately three foot

diameter) drip bag for improved work access.

On October 5, 1994, during the 2R6 Loop 1 hot leg breach and removal ofthe EDM

equipment a large quantity of water was released from the system,

The water quickly

filled up the drip bag and overflowed (estimated 90 gallons).

Although precautions were taken to contain the anticipated water and protect personnel

from contamination, PG&E agrees that a more thorough pre-job planning process could

have prevented the spill of contaminated water.

PG&E further agrees that the HITteam process was inadequate to prevent a second

contaminated water spill.

K)'d

ZT288988 TSTG

Ol

CORRECTIVE STEPS TAKENAND RESULTS ACHIEVED

A thermowell drain adapter and discharge line were provided to control the water from

the remaining Unit 2 RTD installation system breach activities.

Mo further

contaminated water spills occurred as a result of the RTD thermowell installation

activities.

A case study ofthis event has been prepared for review by construction and plant

personnel to heighten awaroness of management expectations for proper planning of

work during a system breach and to emphasize the need to initiate appropriate problem

identification documentation.

Administrative Procedure AD7.NC2, "Conduct of Work," has been issued to provide

guidance to ensure construction work activities are conducted in a safo, consistent, and

effective manner,

This procedure provides specnc guidance to consider planning,

proper equipment; and materials for handling potential anticipated/unanticipated

water

releases.

PG3E believes the corrective actions taken described above should be effective and

no further actions are necessary.

CORRECTIVE STEPS THATWILLBE TAKENTO AVOIDFURTHER VIOLATIONS

DATEWHEN FULLCOMPLIANCEWILLBE ACHIEVED

PG8 E is currently in full compliance.

S8'd

ZTZ889K TST6

Ol

I