ML16341G385
| ML16341G385 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Diablo Canyon  |
| Issue date: | 11/29/1991 |
| From: | Yuhas G NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | Rueger G PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML16341G386 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9112160253 | |
| Download: ML16341G385 (6) | |
See also: IR 05000275/1991029
Text
PA>g
UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMI$$ION
REGION V
1460 MARIALANE, SUITE 210
WALNUTCREEK. CALIFORNIA94696.6368
ggya~ les4
Docket Nos.
50-275
and 50-323
Pacific Gas
L. Electric Company
77 Beale Street,
Room 1451
San Francisco,
94106
Attention:
Mr.
G.
M. Rueger,
Senior Vice President
and General
Manager
Nuclear
Power Generation
Gentlemen:
SUBJECT:
NOTICE OF VIOLATION AND NRC INSPECTION
REPORT
NOS.
50-275/91-29
AND
50-323/91-29
This letter refers to the routine inspection
conducted
by Messrs.
M.
Cillis,
R.
Bocanegra,
and
D.
Chancy
of this office on September
19-27,
1991 and
October 15-18,
1991, of activities authorized
by
NRC License
Nos.
DPR-80 and
DPR-82. At the conclusion of the inspection,
the findings were discussed
with
your staff members identified in the enclosed
inspection report.
Areas
examined during this inspection
are described
in the enclosed
inspection
report.
=Within these
areas,
the inspection consisted of selective
examinations
of procedures
and representative
records,
interviews with
personnel,
and observations
by the inspectors.
Based
on the results of this inspection,
certain of your activities appeared
to be in violation of NRC requirements,
as specified in the enclosed
Notice of
Violation (Notice).
The violations, involving the fai lure to label
two
containers
of licensed material
and the failure to'ost several
radiation
areas
is of concern to us because
the findings are not consistent with your
previous performance
record.
We will be interested
in seeing your analysis of
the causative
factors for the violations and
how your corrective actions
wH 1
preclude
recurrence.
You are required to respond to this letter and should follow the instruction
specitied in the enclosed
Notice when preparing your response,
In your
response,
you should
document the specified actions
taken
and any additional
actions you plan to prevent recurrence.
After reviewing your response
to this
Notice, including your proposed corrective actions
and the results of future
inspections,
the
NRC will determine
whether further
NRC enforcement action is
necessary
to ensure
compliance with NRC regulatory requirements.
The responses
directed
by this letter and the enclosed
Notice are subject to
the clearance
procedures
of the Office of Management
and Budget as required
by
the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1980,
Pub.
L.
No. 96.511.
In accordance
with 10 CFR 2.790 of NRC's "Rules
and Practice",
a copy of this
letter and the enclosure will be placed in the
NRC Public Document
Room.
9112160253 9iii29
ADQCK 05000275
0
bcc w/enclosures
docket file
Hr.
G.
Cook.
Hr.
B. Faulkenberry
Hr. J. Hartin
Resident
Inspector'roject
Inspector
bcc w/o enclosure
J, Zollicoffer
H. Smith
Region
V
H.
i 1 1 i s
i '/i~/0 I
/L<C'L.
RBocanegr
DCha
II hxglyr
i( /Zgl f
0
Should you have
any questions
concerning this inspection,
we will.be glad to
discuss
them with you.,
Si
erely,
(~pi:,
.
P. 'Yuhas,
Chief
Reactor Radiological Protection
Branch
Enclosure:
1.
2.
Inspection
Report
Nos.
50-275/91-29
and 50-323/91-29
cc w/enclosure:
J.
A. Sexton,
PGEE J.
D. Townsend,
Vice President/Plant
Manager
R.
F.
Locke,
Esq., Attorney D.
A. Taggart, Director, equality Support
B.
Thomas,
News
Serv>ces
T.
L. Grebel,
Regulatory Compliance Supervisor State of California
Bob Hendrix County Administrator