ML16245A425
| ML16245A425 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oconee, Arkansas Nuclear, Crane  |
| Issue date: | 07/05/1979 |
| From: | Miller W NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM) |
| To: | Reid R Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7908290508 | |
| Download: ML16245A425 (2) | |
Text
JUL 1979 DOCKET NOS.
069,5 0-270, 50-287, and 50- 13 NOTE TO:
Robert W. Reid, Chief, Operating Reactors Branch No. 4, DOR FROM:.
William 0. Miller, Chief, License Fee ManagementrBranch, ADM
SUBJECT:
FEE CONSIDERATIONS FOR TWO APPLICATIONS EACH ON OCONEE UNITS 1, 2, AND 3 AND ANO, -
1 UNIT 1 Attached are the originals of the fee forms which you recently sent to this Branch on the subject facilities:
- 1.
ORB #4-193/79 (signed 6/19/79) for application dated May 25, 1979 on Oconee Units 1, 2,-and 3 relating to-feedwater system., For this-item, you determined-that the application-is<.exempt from fees because it was requested by NRC Order dated 5/7/79.
- 2. ORB #4-195/79 (signed 6/20/79) for application dated June 6, 1979.for ANO-1 on' feedwater system.\\. For this item, you determined that the Class III fee paid by AP&L s correct.
- 3.
ORB #4-194/79 (signed 6/20/79) for application dated 5/21/79 on Oconee Units 1, 2, and 3 which appears to res and to I&E Bulletin 79-058 on
-setpoints of the pressurizer electromatic relief valve and reactor coolant system high pressure tHp.
In this case, you determined that the application is exempt from fees because.the 5/7/79 Order (page 3)
.requested it.
- 4. ORB #4-196/79 (signed 6/20/79) for application dated 4/24/79 on ANO-1 Unit 1 which appears to also be in response to I&E Bulletin'79-05B on the same subject as item 3 above. For this item, you determined that a Class.III fee is due because it is not related to reload application, as the licensee implies.
After reviewing items 1 and 2 above, it appears that if we exempt the.appli cation for Oconee from fees and charge for ANO applicationwe would be inconsistent on fees since both items seem to be in response to NRC orders (5/7/79 and 5/17/79).
.908290609 On item 3 above, for which you requested an exemption'because the 5/7/79 Order required the.application, we can only find a discussion of the subject on page 3 of the order. This application does not seem to be a part of the ordered items, but rather only a discussion on wh~t the Bulletin'required.
Jl14 Consequently, we do not feel that item 3 for Oconee should be exempt.. We Feel Ithat Icemns 3 111u LI above arf iJom1 s)ubjecq Eo amendIMtOe.
Robert W. Reid J--ULv 19 It would be greatly apprveciated if you would re-review the above two situations and provide further comments on them for our clarification. If you agree that the fee assessments should be changed, simply provide amended-fee forms to us with any rrcessary clarifying notes.
Original Signed by Wm. o. Miller William 0. Miller License Fee Management Branch Office of Administration Enclosures.:
Items 1 thru 4 above w/applications cc w/o enclosures:
M. Fairtile, ORB-4 G. Vissing, ORB-4, R. Ingram, ORB-4 R. Diggs; LFM8 DISTRIBUTION-w/o enclosures:
Regulatory Docket Files 50-313, 50-269, 50-270, 50-287 LFMB Reactor Files 50-313, 50-269, 50-270; 50-287 (w/copy of fee forms only)
LFMB R/F
, UR A E,
DATE...................
rBC rm 318 (9-7 ) NRCM 0240 U.S.
ovUNM.RT PRINTING oFpC; 197
- a97 -*760