ML16216A602
| ML16216A602 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Quad Cities  |
| Issue date: | 05/02/2016 |
| From: | Palagi B Operations Branch III |
| To: | Exelon Generation Co |
| Shared Package | |
| ML15274A320 | List:
|
| References | |
| SVP-16-001 | |
| Download: ML16216A602 (1) | |
Text
ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station Date of Examination: 04/18/2016 Itm Task Description lnitials a
b.
c#
1.
W R
I T
T E
N
ítN 6e
- b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401N and whether all l(/A categories are appropriately sampled.
u 6f
- c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topicq_
I
ü lt ffi
- d. Assess whether the iustifications for deselected or rejected l(/A statements are appropriate
íl ü,4 -P 2.
S I
M U
L A
T o
R
- a. Using Form ES-30't-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major transients.
íN ¿ 6e
- b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule wthout compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be rspated on subsequent days.
ítf * &
c.
To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in with the qualitative and Appendix D.
flfl 4 P 3.
W A
L K
T H
R o
U G
H
- a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline msets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:
(1) the outlne(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants'audit test(s)
(4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the fom (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, mergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form.
\\tl á r
- b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES'301-1:
(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examnations ftl k
¿r'/ &
- c. Determine f there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.
ír,l ?
4.
G E
N E
R A
L
- a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections.
fltl & 6e
- b. Assess whether the 10 CFB 55.41143 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.
.4 K
- c. Ensure that l(/A importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5 I ltl 6 N
- d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.
K
- e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage
á #
rinted Date t/t¿/t
/h2lt¿p l¿qtr Itdtf-
- a. Author
- b. Facility Reviewer (-)
- c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)
- d. NRC Supervisor
\\l
- lndependent NRC reviewer nitial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.
Note:
. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines.