ML16181A401

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
NRR E-mail Capture - Beaver Valley, Unit 2 Acceptance Review Request for Alternative to ASME Class 1 & 2 Requirements for Components Connected to the Steam Side of the Pressurizer
ML16181A401
Person / Time
Site: Beaver Valley
Issue date: 06/29/2016
From: Justin Poole
Plant Licensing Branch 1
To: Lashley P
First Energy Services
References
Download: ML16181A401 (2)


Text

NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: POOLE, JUSTIN C Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2016 3:33 PM To: Lashley, Phil H.

Cc: LAMB, TAYLOR A

Subject:

BEAVER VALLEY, UNIT 2 ACCEPTANCE REVIEW RE: REQUEST FOR ALTERNATIVE TO ASME CLASS 1 & 2 REQUIREMENTS FOR COMPONENTS CONNECTED TO THE STEAM SIDE OF THE PRESSURIZER

SUBJECT:

BEAVER VALLEY POWER STATION, UNIT 2 ACCEPTANCE REVIEW RESULTS RE: REQUEST FOR ALTERNATIVE TO ASME CLASS 1 AND CLASS 2 REQUIREMENTS FOR COMPONENTS CONNECTED TO THE STEAM SIDE OF THE PRESSURIZER By letter dated June 3, 2016, FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company submitted a relief request for Beaver Valley Power Station, Unit 2. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this relief request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed relief in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.

If you have any questions, please contact me.

Justin C. Poole Project Manager NRR/DORL/LPLI-2 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (301)415-2048 1

Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 2929 Mail Envelope Properties (Justin.Poole@nrc.gov20160629153200)

Subject:

BEAVER VALLEY, UNIT 2 ACCEPTANCE REVIEW RE: REQUEST FOR ALTERNATIVE TO ASME CLASS 1 & 2 REQUIREMENTS FOR COMPONENTS CONNECTED TO THE STEAM SIDE OF THE PRESSURIZER Sent Date: 6/29/2016 3:32:33 PM Received Date: 6/29/2016 3:32:00 PM From: POOLE, JUSTIN C Created By: Justin.Poole@nrc.gov Recipients:

"LAMB, TAYLOR A" <Taylor.Lamb@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "Lashley, Phil H." <phlashley@firstenergycorp.com>

Tracking Status: None Post Office:

Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1809 6/29/2016 3:32:00 PM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received: