ML16180A436
| ML16180A436 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 02/01/2016 |
| From: | Luminant Generation Co |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML16042A346 | List: |
| References | |
| txx-16006, CP-20160003 | |
| Download: ML16180A436 (119) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:ooo. 1 t*I'~~~' OKLAHOMA NEW ME.XICO i-}. c,O O\O lO *O f. 0 fl O i...ol-.* .............. ___ .* - - . . . t.i> o~ Miles SCALE c/>-v~ 10 a 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 MILES SITE COORDINATES UNIT NO. 1 UNIT NO. 2 TEXAS GRID Y=229, 723. 96 Y=230,0l0.86 (FEET) X=l,911,921.11 X=l ,911 ,951.27 U.T.M. GRID N=3,573,903 N=3,573,991 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. (METERS) E=614,393 E=614,401 (ZONE 14) FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 LATITUDE 32°17 1 52.02 1 1 32°17 1 54. 85 11 LONGITUDE 97°47 1 06.15 11 97°47 1 05.79 11 SITE LOCATION FIGURE 2.1-1
*~'?,;
"\
"1i "t
/"/
r-
\
/
/
/
////
/
;---*** ,. ,, *.<P'
.. ,.,., .<P' CREEK RESERVOIR T O l .T. ~
RY. CO. ,._IN TRAC K ~------ AMENDMENT 89 AUGUST 20, 1993
* ,,, .<Ji' PR OP [R TY LIN[ I SIT[ 8()JNOllT S;->f;>("
~. .<b;
--- PL AN TACC f SS ROA O
- - ROA D EASE MENT
,.,..,, .~ .. ,.,,.di" 18Qo 2-00 H£T
"'\
.\ .,
*.si'?P
\\ *~ .JO ._.\
\ \
,- ----, .r> "'"-,
\ *t '<Jf'
/
/
/
~
( { V?// ./ J '-\'-.\. \. ..,i,o' "'"
.. tt1*<il'
\
\
\__
,tt<Jf' TOl . T.* 1. F.
~
RT.CO . ..... AMENDMENT 87 DECEMBER 18, 1992
,t,,.
r;";r~ .... " COMANCHE PE AK S. E. S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UN ITS 1 and 2 1100 ZltOO FUT OWNERSHIP OF SURFACE RIGHTS ~-f, *.- ;;;i;a;;;;;I \.\ *~ IN THE EXCLUSION AREA
- t""'.p> *"' '<fl' ... \"l._. .('//l \ \ \ FIGURE 2 .1-2 A
.\ \.\ -~ \ .\ \ \ _/ .0 \ *'"" c:~ *i"'""" ~' ', ~ SQUAW CREEK \ \ \__ ~ .. ."**"" TOA.T.&1.F. ll'f.CO ....~ AMENDMENT 87 DECEMBER 18, 1992 LEGEND .r,,.1(- *'"" ~.<l>, - - EXCLUSION AREA COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. PLANT ACCESS ROAD Ft.JAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT LONE STAR GAS 6" PIPELINE UNITS 1 and 2 WEST TEXAS GULF 26" OIL PIPELINE 1800 HOO F"HT ", EASEMENTS WITHIN =:;I .\ "\ ._. *..-~ THE EXCLUSION AREA .,.,.."" .,,,.<fl' ,._it* *cr:P '!> .\ .\ .\ FIGURE 2.1-28 ~ ~ -~ "\ \ \ \ \ .. i."1'1*"" \ \ \_ .. '!.)**"" AMENDMENT 89 AUGUST 20, 1993 .. ,_..,..,,.,,. lUllll ~:4J, IMMSS P:Olt llt!N("AL EX!tl<>f'ATION MAY IE COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S. ~' ucu111* ~ l'lMT.-cct:SS- FNAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT - S S '"<0 EGAE SS lllGHTS fOlllH<EllALlllTUlt:HS UNITS 1 and 2 OUTITAIOOlllG .... J . . . ,.fT EXCLUSION AREA ~'\ \ "J "J MINERAL RIGHTS .. ,_.,.."" .. '!.,_,,,,,. .. ,."..."" '\ "\ \ \ Fl(JLff 2.1-2 C~ I, [Vfl I ) \kb!i \ \ l, J f40" ~P 1 e,,.... KEY: -MATED 1976 POPULATION CTED 1980 POPULATION lJECTED 2000 POPULATION I ) iJ~ ~ <"~'\.- *NOTE 1970 AND PROJECTED 2020 POPULATION )-'.) FROM 0 TO 1 MILE IS NIL --L# 1434 SCALE IN MILES 3 N NNW -- NNE -- -----r~i&:~~N~,- - -- -- 1 GRAFORD* I I I I I DALLAS I I I WNW f!f:I; I I 11: @STRAWN
- GORDON r--- DALLAS COUNTY
-"EwscoU"NTv -Z l~PAN 0 '_J_ MINGUS ~U~Y --T- PAL O PINT O COUNTY - -COUNTY ERATH \ 1 I l ~AXAHACHIE I I I I MAYPEARL w .,.,,.,._.... ) ~i~~ ~*1~~ E c,O~ N"r c,"'-"'30-< ~%. . \ ~o'°"'"' \\ \ q,ITALY //" // c.0'ff>-'/ ~¥~ ~DUBLIN 0~ \ MO~GAN HILLSBORO \ ,../\\ r ESE KEY : 20 ESTlto!ATE D 1976POPlJLATI ON ~F&Jl:X'TE0138CPOf'IJ!.A.T!ON 60 PJl0J[CT£0 2000POPUlAT I ON / ~.- \5.,12 c,o'°> ~WHITNEY ~ ~~'\~/ REFERENCE : ~/ THE BASE f OR THIS MAP WAS PREPARED F ROM PORTIONS OF TH E ~ FOLLOWING U. S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY I
- 250,000 MAPS
\ *ABBOTT ABILENE, 1954 , REVISED 196!5 COMANCHE \ BROWNWOOD, 1954, REVISED 1964 DALLAS , 1954, REVISED 1963 \ / SHERMAN, 1954 , REVISED 1963 ) / WACO, 1954, REVISED 1963 / ~c.;;;,"'~('" 750 -m- .CLIFTON (bWEST SW c,0'1-":J:.c,%., .c.O'° -~,.- //y.~"" / // HAMILTON ~ COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. / \ ,..,.."\ c,O'°~-{~.?"" FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT \ '?-~~...,~~~~~ UNITS 1 and 2 \ \ POPULATI ON DISTRIBUTION BY SECTOR-AREA SSW ,,,./ .:m- \ lOTOSOMILES s FIGURE 2.1-4 97°47' .JO" ---\.- . . . - r., *.\**r\_.-r:.:.*""""'.*-~.~ -..1,>:~,)**-* ../"} ----~*~--:.**~"> *- \ L \~\r~ ) t \ \ J/ *Z<~ ~.*.r., *\*****-~!:'( **... ' \\r,r 1 t ~-~----.--.~_- ..-......:.:.7 . * \} - i-r/'--1 - '<:::*. \J\\,\\" ) . / '1 ,\ *,"\.:it..****..... 01 co*oo*l/ .~" , \ \ ~._ii:.\I ?f~ 1\~ * \,. .* ) \ \ .. ** :f \~'t\ -~~,{( ~:-*/\ r ~* ~ Jt , _,..; I ",,zp~x t * '" ;' f_1* *.* ** *-' \\ : * *-t:-: ' f'.. \.,'\ :- I y' ,, .'II,_,_.\ ; 10~. _., ' ,\' ' .... 1* ' - , .,1:* *,\ j I I , ! \ -~'o\ ;/!-* '* ' ' r_ ,, " )_;. . ) \\ -> *. '. ~ i \' ** : r . l \ ** *;*
- ~ ~
I \ , j(- \ ,* I I NE . '>,*,\\. :*~*~/ ~'.>';). {~:;"(1 \ -*~ ) \, !\-;; ~ . t'. --~~+1~1 ' ' \.* J. ~ ~ .~ \ ~-,_..:A ~ ..\ . '") --.,. "~
- \' r,
....... \ LEGEND PROPERTY LINE '*:*' -*~. .:~~i~.~~~~-,~1~~r EXCLUSIOll AREA ,*~ ~~p,_,, ... -~ ~- .... . . :--..:,... . .;" .~ . - , . )' ~.~ ~~- * ,*, " , ,, ** ). } : / I ./'./: ,Y"' \* _.., ,. ...-** .. y ' 1.J.~ . ..... *: /1"ic._, 32°17 1 30" 32°17* 30" '.:{;'.,-~Hf~::~(... **.' ~*" I __,,, - ~~-,f\ .. u(_ *, ~- { l\ *~*. \~\_I, \\I *. \ \ * . \., ~.\ ..! .' \ ,..~.\."-*.* .../ . .\.:.¥ **--.:.:*****,_"'.,,:'cl * <.;<,, ,~< ~ /' ,. ' . . ._J~~:::t:(.> -~-:.} AMENDMENT 53 . ~ , ". *.. ,_ _Y. NOVEMBER 5, 1984 ,"/ 'I . I COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT KM.I UNITS 1 and 2 I IHLI LOW POPULATION ZONE 0-4 111LES 97°47'30" ~ FIGURE 2,1-5 10,000,000 f- - I 5,000,000 - 0/0 0/ f-ASSUMED UNIFORM POPULATION DENSITY OF 500 PEOPLE I SQUiRE MI~ / 1,000 ,000 f-I ~ty 0 /0 500,000 I / --0 I/ z: 0 c( 0 I 0 w c(
- E:
u 100,00 ,_ f-f- I0 /0 50,000 l/~ I 0 I / CPSES CUOJLAnVE POPULATION CURVE, 1980 0 I 0 10,000 ,_ I I 5,000 I-0 I I l 0 I I-I- 0 1,000 0 I 10 20 30 40 50 MILES FROM CPSES SITE COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 1980 CUMULATIVE POPULATION FIGURE 2, 1-6 10,000,000 ,_ I /0/- --+---~ 0 5,000,000 : ~ AS SUMED U_NI FORM POPULATI ON DENS ITY i / ,_ OF 1000 PEOPLE I SQUARE MI LE 0 ~/ 0 1,000,000 ~ // 0 ;0----t----- 1 / I 500,000 ~--+---+---I------+---;- * ---1---------+----l----~ v 1 I 1t 100,000 1--~------1----1------l----1--:- /+---+I- - --+-- - - + -- - - 50 .ooo
- I - - - - -
1- ---1-1 l0 / lK I 0/ I I I CPSES CUMULATIVE POPULATION CURVE, 2020 ~ 10 ,000 l-=- - - - + -1---- / ---4-- - ----+-- - - - + -- - - *- + - - -- - - -+--- --- - 0 5,000 ~----++--+---+-----+-----+----+----+-------I i 0 0 1,000 1 . . - - - - - - 1 1I - . & . - - - ' - - - - - . l . . . . - - - _ J , . - - - - ' - - - - . l . . . . - - - - - J 0 10 20 30 40 50 MILES FROM CPSES SITE COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 2020 CUMULATI VE POPULATION FIGURE 2.1-7 (EA~Th /.(WEST *.*.* .:RE.FUELING .TRACKS . : AR-1028 . KEY *
- AIRPORTS STATUTE MILES 0 10 20
~~: REFUELING TRACKS COMANCHE PE AK S. E. S i: VICTOR AIR LANES FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 AMENDMENT 82 JULY 31, 1991 AIR TRAFFIC O TO 20 MILES REFERENCE : This map was prepared from portions of aectional aeronoutiea l charts, San Antonio a Ft. Worth . FIGURE 2, 2-1 0 K LAH OM A. DALLAS FORT* W~RTH \ ~I \~ e Ml OLAND :BILENE ' WACO 0 I;; ., SITE TEXAS L _ _::':__J 300 NORTH SAN ANTONIO STATUTE MILES 0 100 200 - --l COMANCHE PE AK S. E. S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 CLIMATOLOGICAL STATIONS AND REGION FIGURE 2. 3-1 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 AIR POLLUTION POTENTIAL NUMBER OF DAYS IN 5 YEARS
Reference:
Holzworth, G.C., 1972 FIGURE 2. 3- 2
FORT WORTH DALLAS CLEBURNE SCALE IN MILES 0 20 40 60 80 100 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 LOCAL METEOROLOGICAL STATIONS FIGURE 2.3-3
SCA L E IN MILES 0.5 1
-***---=====--1
~" ~ 0
1000 1000 NW SE -::::; -::::; (/) Cf) 900 SITE 900 ~ ~ GRADE i--: LL i--: LL 800 800 z-z0 0 I-i= <i
> w w _j
_J w w 600 600 5 4 -s 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 DISTANCE FROM STATION (MILES) 1000 1000
-::::; NNW SSE :J
(/) (/)
~ 900 SITE 900 ~
I-' LL GRADE ~ LL z 0 800 Ci:
- i.....
800 z 0 I-
<i
~ ~
w _J w ~ _j w 600 600 5 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 DISTANCE FROM STATION (MILES) COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 TOPOGRAPHIC CROSS SECTIONS (CORRESPONDING TO RADIALS SHOWN IN FIGURE 2. 3-4 FIGURE 2. 3-5
1000 1000 w E :i" 3 SITE (/)
~~ 900 ~
Cf) 900 ~ I-GRADE
~
I-LL LL. z 800 V) 800 z0 0 I- ~ i==
~/-
<(
<( > 700 700 > w w _J _J w w 600 5 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 DISTANCE FROM STATION (MILES) 1000 1000 3(/) ESEI :i" Cf) SITE ~ 9001 WNW GRADE 900 ~ f--'. r-: LL. RESERVOIR 1--- SQUAW CREEK LL. z0 800 z W%'1 800 0
~
<( DAM i==
> 700 700
<(
w w _J _J w w 6005 600 4 3 2 0 2 3 4 5 DISTANCE FROM STATION (MILES) COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 TOPOGRAPHIC CROSS SECTIONS (CORRESPONDING TO RADIALS SHOWN _____ IN FIGURE 2. 3-4) I FIGURE 2.3-6
1000 1000 SW NE ':::J ':J (f) (f) 900 900 ~ - ~ i-: i-: u... u... z0 800 800 z 0 j:: j:: <t
<t 700 700 > > w w _J
_J w w 600 600 5 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 DISTANCE FROM STATION (M I LES) 1000 1000
'.]' WSW ENE ':J (f) (f)
~ 900 SITE GRADE ~
~
900 ~ i-: ~ LL
~ LL z 800 V) 800 z 0
~
0 I-
<t I-w 700 ~
Cl:) 700
<t w
_J _J w w 600 600 5 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 DISTANCE FROM STATION (MILES) COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 TOPOGRAPHIC CROSS SECTIONS (CORRESPONDING TO RADIALS SHOWN IN FIGURE 2. 3-4) ___ _ FIGURE 2, 3- 7
1000 1000 s N ':J
- (f)
~
SITE (/) -r:
~
900
- s:: GRADE 900
-r:
~
ii: LL LL z0 800 >.... 800 z 0 I-
~
~
~
<! 700 700 >
w ~ w _j _j w w 600 600 5 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 DISTANCE FROM STATION (MILES) 1000 1000 SSW NNE
':J
(/) ~:s:: ':J (f)
~ 900
~
SITE GRADE 900 e I- >.... ~ LL LL z 0 800 ~
~
800 z 0 I-
<(
~ I-w 700 700 >
_j w _j w w 600 600 5 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 DISTANCE FROM STATION (MILES) COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 TOPOGRAPHIC CROSS SECTIONS (CORRESPONDING TO RADIALS SHOWN IN FIGURE2.3-4)______ FIGURE 2. 3-8
N WAXAHACHIE
~
0 10 20 30 40 L I - -* . _ ' =ti COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 GEtlERP.L TOPOG RAPHIC FEATURES TO 50 MI LES FIGURE 2,3-9
N NW / NE E SW SE s 10 METER 60 METER COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 WIND DIRECTION FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS AT CPSES FIGURE 2. 3-10
N w s
- - DALLAS LOVE FIELD (1 MAY 1972 - 31 DEC. 1972) ---COMANCHE PEAK (15 MAY 1972 - 31 DEC. 1972)
COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 WIND DI RE CTI ON FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS FIGURE 2. 3-11
COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 / _) "~</ * .
,~ ,;~J/~~:--- ~~
- FACILITY PLAN INCLUDING LOCATION OF METEOROLOG ICAL TOWER
~-------. \ FIGURE 2, 3-12
CPSES/FSAR FIGURE 2.3-13 This Figure has been deleted. 94 Amendment 94 August 1. 1996
CPSES/FSAR FIGURE 2.3-14 91 This Figure Has Been Deleted Amendment 91 April 15, 1994
CPSES/FSAR FIGURE 2.3-15 91 This Figure Has Been Deleted Amendment 91 April 15, 1994
CPSES/FSAR FIGURE 2.3-16 91 This Figure Has Been Deleted Amendment 91 April 15, 1994
CPSES/FSAR FIGURE 2.3-17 91 This Figure Has Been Deleted Amendment 91 April 15, 1994
N COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 DILUTION FACTORS-LONG TERM (x 10-7 SECONDS/METER3) _______.,O,___TO . . . ~ .-'-M=IL=E=S_ _ FIGURE 2. 3-18
s COMANCHE PE AK S. E. S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 DILUTION FACTORS-LONG TERM (x 10-8 SECONDS/METER3)
~---'-O_TO 50 MILES FIGURE 2. 3-19
L EGEN D CATCHME NT BOUN DARY
'\
- - - SUB- CATCH MHll BOUNOART
- * * *SP[Cl/\l SUS-CATOlMENT FOR SAFE SH UT-DOWN DAM UN-I s~:l~~:;c:~E;T~E~~N~~~CT~;:~~TION GIYENI A U.S. GS STREAM GAIJG!NG STAT ION NOlE i*:SER~l)IR LEvH Sl!OWN AT 71!!':) THIS IS A f LOOC STllGE ONLY ~MAL OPEAATfNG ~ Evh IS eE TWE~ N 770' ANO n~*
,/
'; --:....,,,,, ~-r,,
j
" "'~c~
,,.').. j
;oi COM ANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
0, " FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT o.:£} UN ITS 1 and 2 off 1J~ S'i'-1\'., CHEK :~. ClfilJPE t: .4.. i
d !o ~ ~I~ ~~
~;
wi~ ~ z ~i" ii u
8 ?W I TCHG,EAR B JI L.l?J!::f!_ . P L AN - Q P e R'Al"IN C, F LOOR E'L . 83 ~* ~ 10" U NI T ,. '2 '.0-W ITC H <'\b-"'-R i?UI L C> ; N c, p.;. RT "'L A N - OPE'R A TI NC, FL O OR
<2? E l e -3!>' - 1 0~
U N IT
- 1 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S Fiii.AL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 SWITCHGEAR BUILDING ROOF DRAINS FIGURE 2.4 - 3
COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 TOPOGRAPHIC MAP OF SITE FIGURE 2. 4 -4
\ I -
\ J.----\- \ \ \
l-----1 \ \ \ \
~ ~
1-----
\ " \
\
\
\
\
\
\
-- --~\
__,...,-"/'-\\--------
\
\
\ ----1
\-~ \ ____ ---\-- \
~
\
\
\
\
\ \
\ \ -- \
- 1. \ ------\--
1 ~\
~
r\
~
\
\
\-----1'--
\ \
() \ \ 0 \ \ \
\ \ _t \
/
/
\------.L-----1 \ /
/
\ \\ -\-------- /
\1--------+--- -\-----
}...:
\ \ \ \ \ ---vi81L ENE
\
_J..- -
----\\
>-!!Pi--- \
\ \
I
\
\
\
____ \>--_ - \
/
,-- )
\
\
\\
-..J.---
\
\I
_.--V -
\ /
\- _-r-_
\ . . . ,--<s-"-""-1\.,'\.iv \ ----, /
\ ~ \-- -- ------ -...__..-5:
\ Iv-~ \ \
\
\ --t r-
\ \ I
>\ \_,
\\..--- --- I"'I _.. ...l.\
~-l/
/ /'------.......__; l
( I I \
<... ..... ,_,.,, "-.../ I - ....-\ / \
v-- -- ._, / \ I J y \....- t....., / /
'-......,, !-___........_ I
.; "-'-.. I
"---,....._ ____ J...,
~ "-
"-, /
l/ I-< 10 20 30 40 50 Miles
'-, / +\c/
',{ ./'
\ o~
\ v*
\; r/>
REFERENCE : The base fo r this map was prepared from a port ion of the Texas Highway map, prepared for COMANCHE PEAK S.E .S. Gulf Oil Corp by Rand Mc Nally, 1971 edition, and the Surface -Water Developme nt map of the Texas Water FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT Development Board, November 1968 . UNITS 1 and 2 TEXAS PORTION OF BRAZOS RIVER BASIN FIGURE 2, 4-5
- POSSU.11 K/NC00.11 LAKE APPRO.f/.llATELf ~
25.ll!LES UPSTREA.11 ~- ([)'!ST/NCJ TARRANT JOHNSON SHPHrnVILLE ERATH BOSQUE ~ /
\ /
\ //
\ /
\ HAMILTON
\
\
COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT POSSIBLE FUTU RE LA!E UNITS 1 and 2 REFERENCE The base to r thi s ~ EXISTING LAKE map was prepare d from porf ior-s of U.S.GS 1*2so,ooo quodro nt mops
& SELECTED STREAMGAGING STATIONS REG !ONAL TOPOGRAPHIC MAP of Abilene, Dallas-Fort Wor th,
- m~~JEirif1i~~ITATION Brownwood and Waco sect ions, FIGURE 2, 4-6
COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 SURFACE HATE R USER MAP OF BRAZOS RIVER FIGURE 2. 4- 7
Y* og111-8
;50 a::
>-0 0
- I
~i;_ /
(/) w
...J w
a::
<I:
- J a(/)
u.. 0 (/) 0 z
<I:
(/)
- J 0
I 1-z
<I:
w a::
<I:
w (.'.)
<I:
z
<I:
a:: 0 (.'.)
~
0980-8 1-m a:: 1-z 0 u 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IO .;- r<> C\I aN0::>3S CJ3d 133.:l ::i1sn::> .:lO saNvsnOHJ. NI 3~CJVH::>Sla COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 MEAN ANNUAL, 50 YEAR AND HISTORICAL PEAK FLOODS ON BRAZOS RIVER FIGURE 2. 4-8
160 2200' BROAD CREST 752 ~ ~
-----r-Tl"..l"Ar~78j'...... ~
140 790 ~O' UNCONTROLLED OGEE *----- ----- ~
,CRES\~E~~~~~ SPILLW~-::::: !
788 1
~
~ I .--- __.....--::;:::. ? 11 I !
120 786 1 VI _V_ '-._ c6t.1BINED TOT AL DISC~ARGE
~
b 784
~ v ;" i 130 I
100 782 j!!; 80 INFLOW --ti-( I l\I 120 I I I I
] I
~n*
I 780
~
~
780 778 I I I I I I I I I I
~ 776 I 0::
~ I I 60 774 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 SPILLWAY DISCHARGE IN THOUSANDS OF CFS 40 I
SPILLWAY RA TING I I 20
\
0 AREA IN THOUSANDS OF ACRES 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 6 820 TIME IN HOURS _..).-- 800 HYDROGRAPHS ~ I IJ-+-r
~
780 60 r - - - - - + - - - H - - - - + - - - + - - - ! - -
- 760 ~
CAPACIT\~
~ 740 1"
I J ~ ! i AI ----f-t----t-- z J71 ~ 50 I ! 0
~
720
/
v ARE~=r ~ 700
~
~
TOP OF CONSERVATION STORAGE: ELEV. ns.d """
§ 40 680 AREA: 3,272 ACRES - +
CAPACITY1150,953 ACRE~FEET 1
-+----+---+-+--+--t--
I\ DRAINAGE AREA1 64 SQUARE hllLES ~ 660 I I I I I I DESIGN STORM RAINFALL: 39.1 INCHES 0 30 640 ~~~--'----'--'---'---'---'-----'--__J'---'---'---'---'----' DESIGN STORM RUNOFF1 34.1 INCHES 0 20 40 60 80 100 :20 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 I
- i:;
20 779 CAPACITY IN THOUSANDS OF ACRE-FEET AREA - CAPACITY CURVE
~ 10
~
~ ~776 SPILLWAY DISCHARCE
- 1775
~ COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
a 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 TIME IN HOURS FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNIT I and 2 MASS CURVE SQUAW CREEK RESERVOIR FLOOD ROUTING AMENDMENT 78 JANUARY 15, 1990 FIGURE 2.4-9 051589027 .DGN
5,000.---.-~-.--.......l~~l~--~.----~..----,~~,~----..----~....----~-----
- 6. 14 Hrs.
- 3. 45 Hrs.
(_I .~---+---<fl--+--\_\ ~fs 1 I---+-- 4 , 310 4,000~--+-~+---l-~-\+----l~'l--~~~+---+-~-+------+~-+-~I---+-~+---+~
/ / ' \ \600 71'
\'-J-... UPPER1 1 I \\ WATERSHED (38. 01 SQ.I MJ.)I 3,000 ~--+-~~~~~~,~~~-+-~~~~~~~l~~l~~I~~~~~~~~
V) ~a. MAX. 6 HOURS u.. u ,_ b. REST OF STORM z J 0 ....J u.. 2 6 9 12 15 TIME IN HOURS COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S. NUCLEAR PLANT UNITS 1 and 2 SQUAW CREEK WATERSHED UNIT HYDROGRAPHS FIGURE 2.4-10
i---
~
i---
~----- ~*
i--- ~
~
~ ~ ~
790 r - - -- 'r-* . scR at E.\e-J. 789
~ ~
.......-- ~
-l-- - 788 ,.,,...,,,-
~
e.... - 181
~ .--
----- ~
/'--
~
~
0
- J c;;
I I!
-~
780 - - -
,_....--- ~
~
_,.,,. ~ i' L..---'
~
I 18~..- ,,,,,, E _J w 785 _l.---___ 4 --
~~ _,,. .../ .- ~-
Crest at 769.5
~
~~ / . . . . . -, I
> I~
w / I ._
~
_J 1s~ ~ / 3 3 a:: .---- +----- -* - w
~ <l: ~
_i---
~~~/
----- 1si. _.,,;"' / ~*-
~---- v~
s' _/ / /
~---
. H ... *~ IT I 40 . ___
i ** ~
- 1 ,,,,,, _......:;
(/) (/)
----;-;;; ~:/
~/
COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S. 780 ---~9// FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
~~~ UNITS 1 and 2
~:?'
___.. 11
- Safe Shutdown Impoundment Yv Discharge Characteristics Spillway 776 j(" FIGURE 2 . 4 - 11 0 5 10 15 20 DISCHARGE IN 1.000 CFS
1f400 l ,300 l, 200 l fl 00 I\ 1 ,000 \ 900
'\
Vl LL 800 \ u z 700 \
- s
0 ......J LL 600 \ 500 \ 2 400 \ 300
' \ -- - - -
I 200 100 I ""' ...........
~
0
~
0 2 3 4 5 6 TIME IN HOURS COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. NUCLEAR PLANT UNITS 1 and 2 SAFE SHUTDOWN IMPOUNDMENT UNIT HYDROGRAPH FIGURE 2.4-12
25 YEAR RETURN PERIOD FLOOD POST POSSUM KINGDOM Cl z 0 () w (/) a::: w a.. 1-w w LL. u ro u LL. 0 (/) Q z <l: (/)
- > I 0
I AFTER COMPLETION I- OF MORRIS SHEPPARD z DAM I 3 0 ....J Li..
- ic:
<l: 251--~~~- ~~~~---.~~--1--+-~~--+~--+~~-+--~--+~---l w a.. _J <l: z 151----~~~-+---.,__~---#--+-~~-+~~-+~-+~~-t-~-+~----1 z <l: 5L-~---L~-41Cl.~~~~_.._~~___.J...~~--L~--l.~~_._~_...~~ 98 90 70 50 30 20 10 5 2 PROBABILITY OF EXCEEDANCE COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 PROBABILITY OF EXCEEDENCE OF ANNUAL PEAK FLOW ON THE BRAZOS RIVER AT STATION 8-0910 NEAR GLEN ROSE FIGURE 2. 4-13
EFFECT IVE FETC H (Fe) = :~: ;~ 2 I. 25 MILES
~1c, L.
17.24 EFFECTIVE FETCH (Fe) = g:~i 2 = RE FER ENCE: ALL WAVE CALCULATIONS ARE DO NE ACCORD IN G TO PROCEDURES PRESENTED IN THE CORPS OF ENGWEERS "COMPUTATI ON OF FREEBOAROALLOWANCE S FORWAVESINRESERVOIRS."ETL !l l0-2-8DATEOAUGUST1, 1966, \MILE PUBLICATI ON . 0 )KI LO METER
-= 371
=
4 2° . 7 43 892 J--- -- 551 ~ 2 ~ ~ 1200 ~
~ ~ ~ 3 1300 1126 750 685 ~ . 9 14 14 00 1'00
~ 5 ~ .~ OH
~
"~
12° ~ 4~0
~ u~ ~ 4E;o 4 1 29
-- J--
1750 1750 1750 8 ~ L- ~ 170 0 1 69 1 "~ 9 .995 4250
~ 1530 JO 1'o .9 78 2543 woo ll 180 . ':151 571
~ .914 ~
324 543 375
~
13 14
.866 400
.: SI 346 324 350 193 15 .H3 J50 N 230,000
/ 8 60
'-.. _____.//
,)
/
/
'\ ,,,-A l N 227 ,000 :
- \ I PEAK S. E.S. ANALYSIS REPORT I I UNITS 1 and 2
\ _\ / FETCH DIAGRAM SAFE SHUTD0\1N l MPOUNDMENT DAM rlGU RE 2. 4-15
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNIT S 1 and 2 SPILLWAY DISCHARGE CHANNEL GRADING FIGURE 2, 4 - 19
Surface Area (Acres) 800100 90 60 50 20
---- ~',1 ~-r-:*11.*---,-**1**- *~r---~sn.::.*
. I . * '
11 I I I"- 1 I 770
~
c c (/) v. ~ c: I'
, u*
- Ii
-+~~+++-i-++.L+l-H-h-J+...l.:.811 ..
760 -~ c w L&. COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S. I FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT I I. 1
'740
- ! 11 UNITS 1 and 2
~. 1 T~W 100 200 300 tl*. J'. *l J1: :Jl]TT;rnr* i1[
UJ. _:_** .. :.;_;_: '.. ,, _._'._ 1 t l .. ili.JlL._.LJ. ___L
- 1 FIGURE 2. 4- 22. I.: c .. L~J.lJ730 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Storaoe Capacity (Acre-Feet)
UNITS 1 and 2 LAYOUT OF S.S.I. DAM AND RELATED FACILITIES FiGURE 2. 4 - 23
100,000.----.---...,..--...,..---..----.,----...-__,,.---...---...,....-...,..--....--- I0,000 .__--+----+---~r---+-----1---+--+----+-----+----+----+---t AVERAGE DISCHARGE a
--r z OF 1,555 CFS 0
l (.) w I 1 ! 1.000 ..___rl-~ (/) n:: w Cl.. 1-w w LL. I (.) CD 100.__--+--+--+---+----1---+--+----~ *----1--+----I-~ ~ (.) z I i I I . I I I I 0 .____- I
-i--+--------+1--
I
---1------*-- l - - ---t------------+------1 I I I I
I :
, I I.___ _.__ _.__ _.__ _...___ __..____._ __._ __.__ __.__ _.__ _ _ __,
0 .01 .I .5 2 10 30 50 70 90 98 99.5 99.9 99.99 PERCENT OF TIME INDICATED DISCHARGE WAS EQUALLED OR EXCEEDED COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 Flow Probab i l i ty Curve For The Brazos River At Station 8-0910 Near Glen Rose FIGURE 2. 4--24
20,000-------------------------------- 10,000 l-----l--l----+--11*-----+-1-r-I ! i I 1 1
- I I I
I I I I I 1,000 I a z I 0 u I I w U) : I I i-I a:: I I
- w 0... 100 1----+-----+----+--~-+---~ --A~-V-E-R+-AG-E---+D-l -
SC~~-E-ti ~ w 70.8 CFS i 1 I w I I I LL. I I II I u I CD I i
'.:) I I u I
-z 10 ! -+ --: I I 3: I 0 _J LL 1---.+---ie----+---+------+---+----+----l-+---+-*~+---+--~ I 0 .1L.--_.__---'_ _..i.._ _.....__ ____._ _....._ _.___---'-------'----.1----' 0.01 .I .5 2 10 30 50 70 90 98 99.5 99.9 99.99 PERCENT OF TIME INDICATED DISCHARGE WAS EQUALLED OR EXCEEDED COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 Flow Probability Curve For The Paluxy River At Station 8-0915 Ne~r Glen Rose FIGURE 2. 4-25
WV) 0 Z! 0~
- ,~
- :1 Ii
~ll! ~ ;;
I f I J ~------*-*----*-- --- ------ -**** * - - -- -- - - ---*--- - - - - - -------* ----- ~ -~ *-*** -- *-- - *----- -* *- I I
,/*~ , I
1.FLOWSINCPM. 2.920 GPM OURINC EMERC£NCY TANK FILL MAKE-UP FROM LAKE GRANBURY
'-----~ m~R~RIZsuRY AUXILI ARY r - - - - - - - - - - - I FEEOWATER PUMPS
. - - - - - - - 1 t~~~~ATIVE 1------ F!R£
~~m~TION TO SAFE r - - - - - - - - - - - - - - T -- --------; f~~J8~~~ENT
-fIT DEalaal.l,1"2 COMANCHE PEAK S.E. S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 AND 2 PLANT WATER SYSTEM UNI T 1- NORMAL OPERATIONS UNIT 2 - SHUTDOWN AT 4 HOURS 1FIC002<t28.DCN
N LEGEND ~ OUTCROP OF PALUXY AQUIFER COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S. AREA WHERE AQUIFER IS CONFINED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 OUTCROP OF PALUXY FORMAT I ON REFERENCE The bose mop for this iltustro11on was prepared from portions of U.S.G S. quadrangle mops. for Abilene, Brownwood, Dallas and Waco. FIGURE 2.HO
\
'* N COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 OUTCROP OF GLEN ROSE FORMATION REFERENCE The base map for this illustra tion was prepared from portions of U.S.G.S. quad r ang le mop s for Abi lene, Brownwood, Dallas and Waco. FIGURE 2. 4-31
,! , /) '.
------ ~ f-- ----~-!:~~_'.':":':'.. C_C*:'~~*r ,,
-JCJH NS C) N C ()UN'i" '-1' I
/)
.,J r
\
\ \...__
LEGEND
------fl:iJ-- ELEVATION CONTOUR COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
~AQUIFER OUTCROP FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 ELEVATl ON OF TOP OF TWIN MOUNTAINS FDRViATlON REFERENCE The bose mop for this ill ustrot1on was prepare d from portions of U.S.G.S . quadrangle maps for Abilene, Brownwood, Dallas and Waco. FIGURE 2. ~- 32
COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 PUB LI C SUPPLY, INOUS TR IAL Aim I RR IGA TI ON WELLS 0 TO 20 MILES FIGURE 2.4- 33
/
N
! SITE@
\ ;'
~
I
- /
* H*'. :, '
~ ... ........... ~
.,,\ .....
/
,.\
\
*tt -~ " ------.'-._
0 10 20 MILES LEGE N D COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
---600 Pl EZOMETRIC SURFACE
_,.-- ELEVATION CONTOUR FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 PIEZ OMETRI C SURFACE , TWI N MOUNTArns FORMATION , REFERENCE The bou mop for thi l i!lu$fro1ion wos prepore d from S!TE REGIOil portions ot U.S.G.S. quodranole mops for Abilene, Brownwood, Dall as ond Waco. FIGURE 2. 4- 34
034 0
. 48 A36
\ '
050 \
\
042 046 04~ 430 Q41 47A 17A 16A 15~ 21A 330 0 0 0 ~: 30 29 02a 0 ,27 013 O~s
~
0 DOMESTIC WELL fJ. STOCK WELL isp
*,\
COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 THE BASE FOR THIS MAP WAS PREPARED FROM PORTIONS OF THE FOLLOWING U.S.G.S WATER WE LLS , QUADRANGLE MAPS HILL CITY, 1961 SITE VICINI TY NEMO, 1961 FIGURE 2.4-35
.. ./;_../
~ ..(';~
'~.
~- ,,,..._
@SITE 0 2 M I.
COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 PIEZOMETRIC SURFACE, REFERENCE : THE BASE FOR T HIS MA P WAS PREPARED TW IN MOUNTAINS AQU IFER, FROM THE HILL CITY, 1961 , U.S.G.S. QUADRANGL E. SITE VICIN ITY FIGURE 2. 4- 36
~
N I \ z 0 (fJ z
*x
.J~
- PW (CPSES Production wells)
- OB (CPSES Observation wells)
- 50-402 (TWDB Observation wells)
- Plant Site 0 SCALE IN MILES !5 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 LOCATION OF PRODUCTION AND OBSERVATION WELLS FIGURE 2.4-37
10 9 8 --- 7 --- 6 5 --- 4 --- 3 2 --- -- 0 0 0 0 Q ____ 9 -- 8_ 7_ 6 -- _J 5 _ _J w 3 4 __ Cl w Cl..
- > 3 --
Cl.. 0 a:: u.. 2 __
\
I-w w u.. 0 0 o_ 0 9 - 8 -- 7 6_ 5_ 4_ 3 2 - 0 0 0 (133.:l) NMOOM\fHO COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 DISTANCE-DRAWDOWN CURVES TRINITY SAND (TWIN MT.) FIGURE 2. 4- 38
I I I I I I I II I I II I IIi 111'-l. I i I I I I I I ! I i I I I I I I I I i ' 210 a:: I I I- I- I- I- H-~ -~I I I I I ~~ Cl...c:( lJ.J 3 l-
*---+-- OBSERVATION I WELL NO. 3r++-"""---
I r-~,..., ~---- _ _ , ___-~-* , --. ~ -~~ ' -- T - ,___ -- - - ___"__ , a u.. l.J.. ......... EL. 890 FT. I jo._~.._._..-..-~ '°""-"-i--1o....,._~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I ,._,._,__ , 220 II 0 I I I I ' I I I ,_""' ' ' 190 I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I '
- I /" I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I ! v 'N..
IIIII IIII /'- ?~
~I a:: I I I OBSERVATION WELL NO. 4 , ................
- i ..--.. 200 I EL. 848 '
~ i t: I I i\
! I I I ! I I I I
~! - 210 i ~T ~lt I 1 1 1 1 1 1 111 I I 11 I I I 11 I I I I L
1 1
'l l I~
1 I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I 220 10 15 20 25 5 10 15 20 25 5 10 15 20 25 5 10 15 20 25 5 10 15 20 25 5 10 15 20 25 5 10 15 20 25 5 10 15 20 25 I 5 10 15 20 25 I 5 10 15 20 25 I 5 10 15 20 25 -- - JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL UY JUNE JU LY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER 1975 COMANCHE PE AK S. E. S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 HYDROGRAPH OF OBSERVATION WELLS FIGURE 2. 4- 39
*-"iut <P '-c/
(,~ . : f~N~f~"'i ~r'(., . t**4*. . -~
----- ~L-*------ ~~:::A~~v PiP: ;<;. ~ ~
~-
- _.,_ ____ ~ - -==:~ -* ------ . .L
- - - ~j~
~ l UNE4"'
'4~
-~ ... *" f'\
"~
L.e:A.v~~ y I
'f't/l \"/<XJ'? ~~Kl ~,; ~
_t"A.£E ~ C~~~l~ WAt..L -------' 10" w. " 1o'b (NGNu."".c.L) 1Ae1.U O .F
!Af;T,l..L t.Un~P.
F'LA'!.ltllt-.4
.-.it£Uft..cC1 TD COl"C.
4~~4':tl'1'1
"-'~
r ~
.k-I
~l~!I' tt:All i N~~
!>Ulli
- uP
~OOF I N4~
~JU.veL Fi~
0-: Q_
/f.cTAL CA?e
~~'.:- FLA~J~
r<> I / -= .'.\ETAL tAP FL.J..eH IN.i, _L PLAN fJ-~~~,~ (L.P.) e>Loll(tN~"
,~d_
12~1( al 'vaoo .
~OC::KIN~ e:iol..1f'O ~ *~
T~ CONC: * --'t-
.......- - - - - - - - - O...IUl"S-'7 op~~I Ne; I
t T.?P 0F i 1 C'-'i"IC.
~L..A!!:>:-i
( L. 't*)
\~
'° SECTION t>ttull.£ ~TTOl 1V c;.clNG , "'4C JULY 31, 1979 B.LOC.t::: I t--4 <:, A. S. FCJI.. \.lo~, .S.1~
~e~e>.
£.,µ R"Do~- ~ m~ rN>O'*
COMANCH~ PEAK S. E.S. FNAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT ELEVATION UNITS 1 and 2 ROOF DRAINS DETAIL OF RELIEF AND DRAINAGE OPENING J.t~F. DW G .. 'Z ~'20 ~A\ ~-o--;o" -~~\J' & FIGURE 2. 4-42
t-A~~1CO A.,.~';\ c\\.1 C, ~c "J>1' or 0 SCALE IN 50 MILES JOO
~'---.,,,* "~1A
~* ~1.~1.'7[".; "
~ *M 0
-v-1J'1*'
Gut.f
<..... rn. -*VJ)" . .
0 f~~rpus
*K .. ' l j .) hr1Jl18ay COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
- ~_fl1
_~tr Boflins Bay FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT JAN 0 -. p L /J.
~* ~-~I"'.
; In UNITS 1 and 2
REFERENCE:
RAISZ, ERWIN, 1957, 11 LANDFORMS :\*.-;: OF THE UNITED STATES
\~\~ PHYSIOGRAPHY r~~.
'" r"'<<>deCil,Y
~(~w\\ FIGURE 2.5.1-1
Character of Rocks Silt, 1ome 1and ond grovel Shale, marl and sand Marl and limy shale Chalky limeslone Shale Ferruginous sand, sandstone, shale, sandy shale, clay and some lignite and gypsum Limestone Shale Limestone Shale Hard, fossiti!;<ous~estone (oJren honey* combed), reef molerial, sh ale, chert and dolomite Limestone ond limy shale Shale and calcareous clay t--ine to medium grained sand, shale,
--0 sandy ond calcareous shale, some c pyrite and iron nodules
~len Rose Formation 0-1500t ..
a a Limestone, shale -and anhydrite Comanche Conglomerate, fine to coarse
~
~
(Lower ..., grained sand, sandstone, si )t .. Cre to ceous) Hensel member 0-175+/-
..0 stone, shale, sandy shale, clay, c
0
;: Caw Creek 0 u
c limy cloy ond limestone 0 member *;; 2. Shale inter- Limestone E Pears al I Trinity I c 0 member
~ "E bedded 0 IL -+i -;: with sand I Shale
,.,, 11 Hammet1 member .,,
-+I C>
;;o z)> 0 E
0
~
2 N N C> co ~ --0 c
~I Gl () --0
...... c 0 ci I 0-1 30:t c ro Sligo member Limestone
~I u.. ::>
0 0 ~ a
~
z (/) ~ I; c
--0 -;
)> ..,., )> ;: "c-r c ~ )> ro 3 rr ro c
<{
J a o "c !!- Sand a.id Conglomerate,
'~:~~::;:
I- a conglomer* fine to coorsa zmZ 0, 4.n I~.,., Vl """I :J t ate with sond and sond-
-i - -I () ca.. C>
.N
~ -; -< I m """I 3
"' <O a
Hosston member II ~ 0-0 l1sso+/-
~ _§ o- ~
E
"'c:
calcareous cement, stone, siltstone, shale, sandy and Ul -i Gl Cf> )>
-4 z -u Ul
- J r+
0.. a~ u 0 0 0 u shale ond limestone calcareous. shale, cloy and limestone
~
OJ )> m m " a
~
I ~ c N :::i !:( I-u:c ;" D
-0 a... (/) )> ........ " "'
I (""') N (/) - "
- 0 (/)
l.O co co Jurassic Cotton Volley
? Sands, conglomerate and shale
(""') 0 mm
-u . Pe nnsy l van i an Mineral Wells Formal ion 0- 60t Shale "'ith limestone seams and layers r Shale, limestone, dolomite, sandstone, c 0 (/)
- 0 . Paleozoic I Most of Paleoroic rocks undifferentiated, Including Ouachita Focies evoporites., and metamorphics 3:
- z -;
I ARKANSAS ANDARKO BASIN
-;r"/!!?~ASIN I
HARDE M A L
- BASIN r
0 c (/) i> z J> u.. ..J &.tJ
- c
<I) z er: &.tJ 1-U) c LL.I UPLIFT 0 IOO llO AMENDMENT 7 JULY 31, 1979
*ALSO KNOWN llS "STRMN BASIN" COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
SOURCES:T.ctonic Mop of Taxa1 , G*olo9ico l Hlfhwoy Mop Flt\IAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT of T .. a1 , Dollo1 Geolagicol Society, 1963. T *Cion i ~ Map of *h* Mid*Co"ti"ont R*gion , UNITS 1 and 2 G*olo9icol Hi9hwoy Map of tho. Mld* Contlnonl Region, A. A. f'.G., 1966 Modified with data REGIONAL TECTONIC STRUCTURE from Turner (Ref. 129) FK.Jl.IRE 2 .5.1-3
LEGEND Scale in Miles QU~TERNARY Qr - Recent 50 100 Qp - Plei5tocene TERTIARY Tp - Pliocene undiv. Tm-To - M1ocene~01igocene undiv. Tj - Eocene, Jackson Te l - Eocene, Claiborne Tmw - Eocene, Midway-Wilcox MESOZOIC AMEi~OMENT 2 COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S. Ku K1
- Upper Cretaceous
- Lower Cretaceous JULY 27, 1978 FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT PALEOZOIC P - Penn i an UNITS 1 and 2 IP - Pennsy1 vanlan M- - Mi ssippian-Cambrian PRE-CAMS RIAN pt - Igneous and metamorphics REGIONAL GEOLOGY SDUR~7: Te~:~~~f~~aln~~~~:~Y A~6ciation of Petroleum Geolog i sts. 197 3 FIGURE 2.5.1-4
-uoo YOUNG DALLAS ST[ll'HEllS I MC LENNAN L IL... '9 llELL WILLIAMSO..
\
AMENDMENT 7 JULY 31, 1979 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT ftEFER TO FIGURE 2.5.1-23 FOft DETAILED UNITS 1 and 2 ELLENBURGER IN THE SITE VICINITY. ELLENBURGER STRUCTURE MODIFIED AFTER: TU~NER (~EF.12~) FIGURE 2.5.1-4a
I Y.: I A' i f. i SITE 12,000 A" 10,000 8,000 l&J ~ 4,000 LOCATION OF CROSS-SECTION A" IA' IJ
~! tLIJ+/-E I
o I:-*.-: -::.:.-"/.'.:.< ! SANDS TON E SA LT I CALLAHAN 1 EAST LA N O I i? I SMIT H I WOO U I II l I ~ SHA L E M ET A MORPHOSE D
".. ,_ I'*1 qo* oo*w
~ ROC KS 12,000
~* DOLO M I TE ~GR A N ITE 10,000 8,000 ~ L IME S T ONE ~ NORMAL FAULT SITE 6,ooo E
!CRo*, SPI 4,000 IL ~ ANHY DR I TE ~ T HRUST F A UL T z
Ki, 2,000 '.j
~~ GRAPHIC ~CAL E LEVEL ..J V [RT l (Al [Xll G(,( flAl iON 20X
<(
2 ,000 ~ rr: 4 , 000 ~ 6 , 0CJO AMENDMENT 7 e,oco JULY 31, 1979 10,000 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 MODIFIED AFTER: Geological Highway Map of Texas, REFER TO FIGURES 2.s.2-30 AND 2.s.1-31 REGIONAL EAST-WEST The American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 1973. FOR CROSS SECTIONS IN SITE VICINITY. GEOLOGIC CROSS SECTION FIGURE 2. 5. 1-5
MONTAGUE IWISE\ JACK I PALO PINTO I ERATH iHAMIL'I'(>NI MILLS ILAMPA1 BURNET BLANCO s N PROJECTED SAS MUENSTER *FORT 1IORTH TUSI SITE LAMPASAS LLANO OUACHITA BA..CJIN ARCH UPLIFT FRONT ARCH 0 -
------ --------- -- /
,/ '
I
"' /I I
/ /.....:..
-.... / /' .
Y.T 1 -. . . -.~ t.a
/,jr.:!°' ' PRE-- 1,, _,,~~
e -2000
~/~
*/
... /...._ CAJIBRIAN :'- ~
v '°\>-. .. -2000 ?i 1-1 z 1-1
-- :: - --- irV~) /' '"'
~
....._' '---- (S /
~
-4000 /-... ' - - -4000 tn
-6000
-_,. I
-6000 E
~
H
- z:
H >oJ
! -8000 -8000 g
-10,000 -10,000 SCALE IN MILES VERTICAL BXAGGZRATIClf 40X
.->aTH-IOUTB GD:Jl.OGIC SECTION
~ QIUWU-*NkX> COUWli, TEXAS "TI MCJBMSTD AllCll TllN)(JG11 ~ UPLIFT z
)> ('") *ALSO DIOm AS STRAW BASilf ro c251~:0 c... ):>
0 fT1 (/) ~ C3: rrn
- 0 I mg- 1:1>
c )> )> -<Z INIJEX STRUCTURAL MAP z~Z CJ
-~ - -I ('")
('") 'fl!! W3:
~ JTI DATUM: TOP ELLENBURGER N -I -< I ~
z CONTOUR INTERVAL: 1000 P'T.
- n (f) )> m -j
- Ul i3 :z
~ MO>IPil:D FIOt TURNER (M:F .129)
...... V'> ;o 0 ..... z '"O \.D -....J
-....J I V'> -i
- x ru ~ m \.D 0\
V'>
- J ~ )> MODIFIED FROM FIGS 8 AND 14, fT1 V'>
I Q.. f:a ;;ii;;: TEXAS WATER DEVELOPMENT BOARD, APPIWJXIMATE no N (f) REPORT 157, VOL.l, 1972 SCALE
;::! =1 ::0 V>
0 ::::c mm
- z a en 0 SOMI.
I DPD TO FIOODS 2.5.l-4a AND
- 0 2.5.1-23 TllllJ 2.S.l-31 POa l<<>RE
-I DBTAILl!D STltOCTURE MPS
DENSITY FORMATION LITHOLOGY 22 24 26 28
~ shole, green, sticky, orogonite concretions
....: 0 UJ shale, buff-colored, papery wit'i sandy lominotion~
~
Q:
...J MIDWAY FM.
UJ and concretions I- < 0.. shale sondv on .d Qloucon i tic shole, groy, sticky NAVARRO GROUP
~ sandstone and sandy shale morl, gray
~-:S
**.*.*.-.*.*, marl, block,
...=-""-i:. sticky with sand Ien ti Is I l!
I
! LL TAYLOR GROUP ~ chalk,
-~-
white, hard shale, sandy i ...J
- £~ shale, dork morly, fossiliferous 10 t¥~-
-~- shale, cnolk gray, calcareous, fossiliferous AUSTIN GROUP cholk, white; marl with glouconite shale, calcareous, minor sand and chalk I ~*
sno1e, 01ack; tM1n*beaoed sane stone 1
"'I EAGLE FORD GROUP rt~a~ es't~~~ya~dds~~°d~~~nc: ~t~~~tus a~hb~: e 5
- i 0
UJ u WOODBINE GROUP L:...----=~ sandstone, green, bentonitic; shale, red
=.:... ..........
~ - ~*...:.*~ sandstone , brown & white, sholy partings
\
I- : *~*:: :* .*. UJ Q: u W1.SHITA GROUP
~
,~-=:-
shale, gray-block , calcareous witli limestone stringers, oolitic , dense
~
55- I
.::r--::=
FREDERICKSBURG G. ~ shale, black, calcareous; I imestone, fossiliferous fh+~ sandstone, with redbeds & minor sha le PALUXY FM . UJ
- ~: ::~ *.:
sandstone
'""- calcareous I
u ~~~ sondstone & siltstone with shaly partings z
< GLEN ROSE FM.
.>6::~:* sandstone , ca l careous ond s i hy sandstone with anhydrite end limestone stringers /\
~
- E 0
u
~-=::=.:.
anhydrite, mottled, pure, massive limestone, oolitic, sandy, shaly sandstone, calcareous, sholy 4
)
~:-:-:::-.
)
== limestone, shaly, lossiliterous ii shale, red & gray i sholy sandstone TRAVIS PEAK FM.
(TWIN MTSJ .:_~......=:-- I
~-:;-t.-:::+-
~-:o~.::~::
- basal conglomerate with chert pebbles
~-.;.
shale, red, green & gray, waxy I
~-
----- -=--
-=----=-
~~--
I I I I II COTTON VALLEY FM ~--- muds tone, varicolored u --=---- shale with dense limestone stringers & minor I I v:;
~ I
"'Q:<
~~
anhydrite
~ shale, maroon, red with anhydrite, salt & silty
~
-, r.UCKNER FM .
~.
sandstone strlnaers
~limestone, brownish gray, crystalline, SMACKOVER LS. foss il iferous, dolomite stringers '~
NORPHLET-LOUANN"~ redbeds, evoporites, conglomerates 1-°' EAGLE MILLS FM . ? t~~li~ shale and redbeds, arenaceous ~
~
OUCH IT A FACIES C:f/,.,. ,..,.. shale, limestone, dolomite, sandstone, evoporites, and metamorphic rocks
)
Amendment 67 February 5, 1988 SOURCE : Crosby, 1971 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 ROCK DENSITY VARIATION WITH DEPTH FIGURE 2. 5 .1-7
--**c~==---f~~~~* -- ,*--*--- *-* ~~--'" -****-~-*-.~ --,7 -- If;
"\ *
'~
)
\;
/
<):
- 1. c u c'H E x 0 F n ~ ~~;~~~~D L CDA,T -~
0
'===-
SCALE !N 50
~=~-t=:=~-~
~ILES 10 0 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT Mlll!GALS) UNITS 1 and 2 OUlSll Y 2. 67 qm/ cm3 REGIONAL BOUGUER
;{~FE RCIU: AMEPJ CAN Gt.OPHY S!CAL UN ICN (69)
GRAVITY MAP FIGURE 2.5.1 -8
z 0
~
x ~x w I I I; I ~1~ 0 UJ z f-z
- J 0
()
/
,,""':r:
, ~
oss*osr a::
--,, .... __w_
LEGEND al {~ ALLUVIUM QUATERNARY ****.*** *
- 01: TERRACE EDWARDS LIMESTONE COMANCHE PEAK LIMESTONE LOWER CRETACEOUS WALNUT FORMATION PALUXY SAND Kgr I GLEN ROSE LIMESTONE
~
OE SOTO OIL CO. 8 .W. WANN NO. I ~ ~5rr~ 9D~~ !iD82 ~0 - 1 DftY a ABANDONED 8/11/!12 Kgr v c. 3 Ml AM[ N[)>!ENT 2 JULY27 , 19 78 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. 0 FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UN ITS 1 and 2
- .A.. PLYMOUTH (N£. DAVIS)
'( T.H. COUSINS NO.I EL. BIODF TOTAL DEPTH 6!110~0-e ORY 8 ABANOOllEO 11/23."I VICINITY GEOLOGIC MAP FIGURE 2.5.1-10
LOCAL G[OlOGlt CIXU191 TY, I CAL ! .. TY, ICAL THICKNESS IN FUT I; § TH ICKNESS IN FEET 1Boo
~
QUATlU*AR' Qal ALLUVIAL DE,OSITS ~ JO Qt Ked ALLUVIAL TEll"-'CES EDWARDS LIHESTOME
!.:: I r ..."'
0
!s I *... l u
I 100 Kep CO~CHE PEAK LIMESTONE ~........,,,,. u I f'../ ............ -- x "'* 100 l<aol* WALNUT FOll~TIOM (SHALE) ~ I
~ I...
100 l(px PALUXY SAND ~ "' ~
~
... ~ 48oO i .., ,,,. I
- LIMESTONE AND SHALE ; >
~
Oil CLAYSTONE ~ LOWER CUTAC [OUS I 80-90
-- --- J
- 11. ~SSIVE LIMESTONE u ...
_,_ "'zz
'~
CL. LIMESTONE AND SHALE
~~:
I~ C C"l~ CME SHIH II 60-70 GLEN ltOSE ~* I I -- ---- Kgr LIMESTONE 111. Oil CLAYSTONE; KASSIVE LIMESTONE o-o~ 111 60-65 ~..,, c;;;
~ 2
~
IV. LIMESTONE ANO SHALE I -- ---- Oil CLAYSTONE CL. ti. i
.i ::; _....
j IV 30-40 l<w u u~
'- .,.; ltOO i"'
~
- u
! ~!r
~
Ktm T\JIN MOUNTAINS SANDSTONE I 250
~ :I u c
z
§i g 0
2500 PENNSYLVANIAN t----- 1 STRAW N SERIES
>55 Pmw MINERAL WELLS CLAYSTONE I
~i (65 FEET OF THIS FORMATION L--:
PENETRATED IN SITE BORINGS)
~ :;;s.; u u PllE*CAAI NOT TO SCALE Amendment 67 KEY:
x EXPOSED FO~TIOM STATION SITE POSITION WITHIN 5 HILES OF SITE February 5, 1988 COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S FNAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 LOCAL GEOLOGIC COLUMN FG..f'E 2.5.1-11
vtJ t((
)
?!<::{
- c GAMMA l-o.. RESISTIVITY RAY LU Cl 0
I ZONE 50 UPPER 58 LOWER 74 UJ z: 0 100 I-V) ZONE II UJ
- E
...... I
....I 139 150 ZONE IIIA I I 158 200 ZONE IV I
---1---+-1 ---r** - - 1 233 I
I I 250 I I TWIN MOUNTAINS FORMATION 300 L----~-----'-------'---'-----' 294 0 40 80 0 100 200 300 400 (COUNT /SEC/IN) (OHMS PER INCH) COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT BASED ON BORING P-10 UNITS 1 and 2 LITHOLOGIC SECTION Amendment 67 AT PLANT SITE February 5, 1988 FIGURE 2. 5, 1-13
- Mid-Cont. Petr. Ca.,
Squaw Creek Cottle Co. No . t
~ -<i V *
*Fitzgerald Morrison No . 1 /'"""-
),.
-v-r 0
Cordova Bend Domsite care T e s V
\I Santo Fe RR Water Well No.8 ~
Cleburne 0 I
*Oil test - Ory and abandoned I °\...
,.. I t
I I Line of Section -1 Note Borings at CPSES revealed variable quantities I yI ~:~ I I I
-=--r
<Y-....._ I
"'o of cloystone (instead of /I .i\. I "o~
shale) within the Glen Rose I SITE I
~ I
- IR,ve~
limestone and Twin Moun-tains formation I
\
I I I\ I . I I : I \ 1 ./ I BORING I ~ PALUXY SAND Datum 0 ALTERNATING LIMESTONE AND CLAYSTONE Elev 771 *- I ZONE II MASSIVE LIMESTONE GLEN ROSE Elev. 709 - *- -- -- - - -- -- - -- --- - - --
- -ZONE m IAl~NATING LIMESJ~~s~~~E FORMATION
-- --" '~'""
Elev. 646 - * - Elev. 615- - ZONE Dl ALTERNATING LI MES TONE AND CLAYSTONE
,;R.NQS-"""']'
300
-CD if r- -- ...;:;:::=-
anhynte pos1t1on - = z l> 0 - Upper Water Sand I TWIN MOUNTAINS
- -...... __ ~dip
.c a
a. l/) ro FORMATION
-I (/)~
l/) ~ c ~ l> ....., )> (=Trinity or Travis Peak Sand
....... -I
-I ......
zmZ ro 3 cr ro Lower Wo ter Sand of wo fer well drillers) rn Gl - --{ 0 -s :::s
-i -< I tn l .......
<:~ "'O (f) l> m c
ll> 0. 3 n::::c ...... z -s ro
............. '< :::s MINERAL zn Q) l> ""O rt- TO 506
....... ::i !::( m <..n TO 5577 TO 4504 FORMATION TO 1225
-I l/)
a.. (/) l> ~
,_. °'
('"') N (/) 7' \£)
-I
...... :::0 (/) co 0 mm co 0 5 10 15 20 ZS z ""O .
0:::0 (f)
. HORIZONTAL SCALE IN MILES
-i
COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. LEGEND: \ e BORING LOCATION \ FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT .- - ""'- BEDROCK CONTOURS UNITS 1 and 2 I ~ GROUND SURFACE CONTOURS
\
VICINITY BEDROCK CONTOUR MAP
/) FIGURE 2.5.1-15
;8;. 1 ""'
~~ I ,, -/
\rs~~~!/a ~~)) )
""-'--'- I I g I I(\%
~\~\ ~~ ~/////
/ /
'\ . (~_/ ~~~-- _,,.,,. . *--*'
>/ //
~//// ,,o//
/
~** ,,,_
II I -------~--- ./ ./
;j/ -- . __../
>11{/;>*- */
/ / (~~ ~
~_,.'.'._: 1, 0, 8 -----==---~
-~=~~-*~=~-~
. . ---------. -~ ). i\ \ ..,rt.. ~r
-~--~CL)~
~ "
~ SS\ rJ 1/
C l ti*:UL~7!.'lf. ',.,1 ,1r:t:~ \
;r<;AKES.TRUCT UR<
\ ' \
\
\
\
~P-5
\ ( ~~ ~
~ *.
, P-14
\~ ~,-~ -. e~:(L,'5 l)SJ1& 2
-(,.<-
---:_';: , \ - -\- P- 2S
~ -------.. P-20 * ... ~ ~ \
- - "" ............_ . ' - - - ~, \ P-29
/--,.~~ ~~~ -~.
- ,~~ ?,.
\ - - .\- L- ~";.,~~.
I
) I ~ " ' """"
/.~-- ,,o~ /
/ ,,,,,--*oo ~ j (T((=~ -
~
! 'IH~MLA7 ED B£ GPOCK cc:H QIJRS
\ ,,o ~\
** ** * * **
- f57I ").TD ac: o ~oC< cc.y:- *:u?.s
- - - G?.Curn S lJ::l ~ ;.1.'.£ UJ.'flCUP5 MTb
- COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
~ \\~
~j
'\ .
- l. R e c ~: CR(.P; Gl! f Qi{ IS USU1'Ll'1 WITH '. N St '1£?.;.L f[ [ l o r l i:. ~ EU ST [.'!(, GK'1lHlfl SLCf "*C:'
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
~ \ UNITS 1 and 2 ~J
HOOD ANO SOMlRV (LL COUNTI ES, TEXAS SCAL£ ;,~ FEET 4 H.J. GRUY AND ASSOCIATES , INC
N A 00 10° ~..------,----..- 10° goo NUMBER OF SEGMENTS MEASURED -o 5 10 15 20 25 30 - 900 DIRECTIONS AND FREQUENCIES OF STRAIGHT STREAM SEGMENTS w IN LOWER HALF OF PALUXY BASIN E N oo l_O~_-r---,--...,.__ ,I 0° 0 900 w NUMBER OF FRACTURES MEASURED -- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 E 900 STRIKES AND FREQUENCIES OF STRUCTURAL TRENDS IN LOWER HALF OF PALUXY BASIN COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
Reference:
Howell, 1967, Unpublished senior thesis, Bay,lor University. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 RELATIONSHIP OF STREAM CHANNEL ALIGNMENTS TO STRUCTURAL TRENDS IN LOWER PALUXY BASIN FIGURE 2. 5.1-18
A' AREA MAP AREA COVERED BY THIS FIGURE A 0 25 50 Miles A Meridian - A' COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT SOURCE: Boone, P., 1963 UNITS 1 and 2 PRE-CRETACEOUS PALEOTOPOGRAPHY FIGURE 2.5.1-19
0 K L A H0 MA
/
/
Lubbock ~ No swelling, granit i c Q Low swelling, little or th i n montmorillonite ~ Medium swelling, montmorillonite cloy
- High swell ing, montmorillonite clay 0 100 200 MILES COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 Modified after Carter,' The Soils of Texas', Texas Agric. Expe i. Sta. Bulletin No. 431, 1951. DISTRIBUTION OF EXPANSIVE SOILS FIGURE 2.5.1-20
PRESSURE IN LBS I SQ, FT,
~
0 0 g
~
0 0 Q Q ~ 0
,01
---- -- . ""'i--..
.02 0
(/) w
- x:
u .03 z: 0 s .04
! '\
""'~ \ (/) z: CJ
\
'-' .OS
.06 DEPTH DRY DENSITY BORING MOISTURE CONTENT FEET LBS/FT3 P-lOA 265.2 105,4 13. 4 COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 CONSOLIDATION TEST DATA FIGURE 2.5.1-21
EX !STING GROUND SURFACE 800 ~ GUN ROSE LIMESTONE 750 L-WET UNIT WEIGHT
- 155 L8./fT. 3 700 L-Et.670' Ii EXISTING PIEZOMETRIC LEVEL IN THE TWIN MOUNTAINS FORMATION 650 L-Et.610' 600 .__ ASSUMPT!~S
.... TWIN MOUNTAINS FORMATION l. WATER LEVEL IN GLEN ROSE LIMESTONE ..."""" WET UNIT WEIGHT
- 1~5 LBS ./FT. 3 REMAINS CONSTANT AT Et. 770'.
~ 2. PIEZOMETRIC LEVEL IN THE TlHN MOUNTAINS 550 L- FORMATION DROPS FROM EL.670' TO EL . *SO'. ~ 160' ~ LAYER l 500 L-PIEZOMETRIC LEVEL AFTER 450 ~ ASSUMED DRAWDOWN 400 .__ 150' POINT B @ LAYER 2 EL. 375' 350 ~ SETTLEMENT CALCUL ATIONS USE THE FOLLOWING EQUATION: P' f S = H Cc Log!O -p-,- o Where S = Settlement In feet H = Layer of th I ckness f n feet Cc"' Slope of consolidation curve on strain vs log pressure plot P' f= Effective stress after drawdown in psf P' = Effect1ve stress before drawdown i n psf 0 Divide Twin Mountains into two l ayers and find Calculate settlement in each layer effer.t1ve stresses in each layer at midpoi nt {A & B) 41 800 At':_ P' 0 * (200' x 155 lb/ft3) t (80' x 135 1b/ft3) - Layer 1 S = (!60')(.034) L09JO (
- i* 0.55 33P64 (140 x 62.4 lb/ft3) = 33,064 psf P' f = (20 0' x 155 lb/ftJ) + (80 x 135 lb / ft3 ) = 41,800 psi Layer 2 S * (150')(.034) Lo910 ( ~g~l):0.61 At! P' 0 = (200' x 155 lb/ft3) + (225' x 135 ib/ft3) - TOTAL SUBS l DENCE = l. 16' (295 x 62.4 lb/ft3) = 42,964psf Al lGmMrnT 4 JANIJARY 31. 1979 P' f = (200' x 155 lb / ftl) + (ISO' x 135 lb/ft3) +
{75 (135 lb/ft3 - 62.4 lb/ft3) J *56,695psf COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 SUBSIDENCE CALCULATION FIGURE 2.s.1-22
J .*- \--7 1 7.~,~~ . )
- 7~ ~1
( f\.. . , .___/) /
.\ ( I .~
\
.. /
\\' 'jc)JJ \\\\\J)J\ \
I/;( ~~ I
/ / 1 ,,# / .,. /
-,, /It\({1'.1J>/
' \./~ /
l 8 ' / /
/ ' ?
§ \
. / '
y/,
' >/ \,/
\
/
/" ,...,,.,,.,,----.-
COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 LEG ENO Ellenburger-Structure Map {/ PRODUCING GAS WELL e PRODUCING OIL WELL
<,:> ORY AND ABANDONED WE LL FIGURE 2 . 5
- 1- 2 3 0 PERMITTED LOCATION NL NO LOG ONP DID NOT PENETRATE MAPPED HORIZON SCALE IN FEET 32000 0 32000
- 4189' TOP OF STRUCTURE (SUBSEA) l".i1"lli - --
II I
\
. I Ellenburger-Structure Map
<) PRODUCING GAS WELL
"'.> DRY AND ABANDONED WELL Z. PLUGGED WfLl JULY 27, 1978 PERMITTED LOCATION CONTOUR INTERVAL: 100 FEET Nl. NO LOG DNP DID NOT PENETRATE MAPPED HORIZON SOMERVELL AND SOUTHERN HOOD COUNTIES, TEXAS
- 4552' NOTE: See Figure 2.5.1-30 And SCALE IN FEET _J TOP Of STR UCTURE (SUBSE Al 8000 0 8000 Figure 2.5.1-31 For Cross Sections A-A' And B-8 1
, Respectivel y MAY', 1978 ~~-...--HJ.
**-*GRUY AND ASSOCIATES, INC
--- u~~~ou~~~-s~~~~-~~~~~~~~~~~~~D-~L_~_.r_~_~_
* ' ~6b.
'1 *~
C( '\ \~ J ";
. ~
\ '
~1-~J
~ / ' f '~;~~<~:/-,*.
' r
\. . (p- j:....
\. ~
*r,,, ,t _\ .,..
,,J
.. ' ; . ::::)
,,**; .,~"'( ,,."
,~ ,1 ,~
\~
!.:1 :~::>: , *,, ." .: r:>,
I :***- - *' *J9 I \'!-
-\ - , *- \ ':'
i 1oo- '. ~: "_~~---~ :;:~----r0#\ *., ;i"'
.*._, c..'
'/""J \- r. I ,,,.. \
\ ,,,*1 \ ,1~
\ i;l N
i' COMANCHE PEAK S. E. S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 Marble Falls-Structure Map AMENDMENT 2 FIGURE 2.5.1-24 JULY 27, 1978 CONTOUR INTERVAL : 100 FEET ONP DID NOT PENETRATE MAPPED HORIZON SOMERVE;LL AND SOUTHERN HOOD COUNTIES, TEXAS SCALE IN FEET
-3841' TOP OF STRUCTURE (SUBSEA)
.NOTE: See Figure 2.5.1-30 And 800~~~~~~~o~...,...~8~000~!.l.iii.lii~l6000 Figure 2.5.1-31 For Cross Sections MAY, 1978
*-*- -- LINE OF CROSS SECTIONS A-A' And B-8 Resoectivelv 1
- DALLAS, TEXAS H. J_ GRUY AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
I~ 8 000 8,000
~
16,000 2.4,000 S CALE: 1i1'* c:=--==----i1::::===:::l---- COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 NOTE: Marble Falls Structure TH E GEOLOGICAL INFORMA TION REPRINTED HEREIN IS THE PROPERTY OF THE GEOMAP COMPANY , AND AMENDMENT 16 Geo Map HAS BEEN EXTRACTED FROM THEIR MAP NO. MBFL- MARCH 31, 1981 T29A, Horizon A, (Notice 1/23/81). FIGURE 2.5.1- 24 0
r COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 I Marble Falls-Net Hydrocarbon LEflENO v PRODUCING GAS WELL Isopachous Map
-¢- ORY AND ABANDONED WELL FIGURE 2.5.1-25 0 PLUGGED WELL 0 PERMITTED LOCATION AMENDMENT 2 CONTOUR INTERVAL* 10 FEET NL NO LOG JULY 27, 1978 SOMERVELL AND SOUTHERN HOOD COUNTIES, TEXAS ONP DID NOT PENETRATE MAPPED HORIZON SCALE IN FEET E6' NET THICKNESS OF PlllY NOTE: See Figure 2.5.1-30 and 8000 0 8000 16000 Figure 2.5.1-31 for Cross Sections MAY, 1978 LINE OF CROSS SECTIONS A-A 1 and B-8 1 , respectively. DALLAS, TEXAS H.J. GRUY AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
' j
-~
/
.*...*.:.;. \
*;,_ -~
~* ~ '*
~ '- -~q,
~~- * \ \.'\\~)
\/
COMANCH~NALYSIS REPORT PEAK S.E.S. FINAL SAFETY d 2 UNITS 1 an LE (j EN 0 AS WELL p PRODUCING G NOONED WELL V ORY ANO ABALL AMENUMEf H 28 0 PLUGG~~E:~OCATION JUL y 27' 197 PERMI ON NL NO LOG ETRATE MAPPED HORIZ ONP DID NOT PEN CTURE (SUBSEA)
~orE: See F'igfurer Cross 2. 5. 1-30
-~642' Sec and TOP OF STRU t'ons
°
- F; "g ure 2
- r.:J
- 1- _31 , res pee t 1 vely
- A-A' and B 8 '
I - I
~
COMANCHE PEAKS. ES . FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 I Big Saline-Net Hydrocarbon PRODUCING GAS WELL Isopachous Map DRY AND ABANDONED WELL FIGURE 2.5.1-27 0 PLUGGED WELL AMENDMENT 2 0 PERMITTED LOCATION JULY 27, 1978 CONTOUR INTERVAL= 10 FEET NL NO LOG ONP DID NOT PENETRATE MAPPED HOR IZON SOMERVE;LL AND SOUTHERN HOOD COUNTIES, TEXAS SCALE IN FEET 15' NET THICKNESS OF PAY NOTE: See Figure 2.5.1-30 And 6000 J'l["_JIU'il"§_ 0 6000 16000 2 Figure 2.5.1-31 For Cross Sections MAY, 1978 LINE OF CROSS SECTIONS A-A' and B-B', Respectively DALLAS, TEXAS H.J. GRUY AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
-~~--.--------**-*-* - ---** -----*-
i
\
'\.,
\
\
'\
-~
\_
\Ai COMANCHE PE.Ll.K S. E.S FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS *1 and 2 Strawn-Structure Map PRODUCING GAS WELL DRY ANO ABANDONED WELL AMrnDMEIH 2 FIGURE PLUGGED WFLL PERMITTED LOCATION JULY 27, 1978 CONTOUR INTERVAL' 100 FEET NL NO i...OG SOMERVELL AND SOUTHERN HOOD COUNTIES. TEXAS DNP OiO NOT PENETRATE MAPPED HORIZON
-1980' !OP OF STRUCTURE (SUBSEA) rWTE: See Figure 2.5.1-30 And BOOO SCALE IN FEET 0 8000 6000 Figure 2.S.1-31 For Cross Sections w.-...i-..----........._-..waa i A-A' and B-t3' , Resµect i ve ly MAY, 1978 DALLAS, TEXAS H.J. GRUY AND ASSOCIATES, INC LINE OF CROSS SECTIONS
r COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 I Strawn-Net Hydrocarbon .!:..[Ji END 1:) PRODUCING GAS WELL Isopachous Map
')- ::>RY AND ABANDONED WELL FIGURE 2.5.1-29 0 PLUGGED WELL AMENDMENT 2 0 PERMITTED LOCATION JULY 27, 1978 CONTOUR INTERVAL* 10 FEET NL NO LOG DNP DID NOT PENETRATE MAPPED HORIZON SOMERVELL AND SOUTHERN HOOD C8UNTIES, TEXAS SCALE IN FEET 43' NET THICKNESS OF PAY 1~0TE: See Figure 2.5.1-30 And 8000 0 ** -* 8000 16000 Figure 2.5.1-31 For Cross Sections MAY, 1978 LINE OF CROSS SECTIONS A-A' and B-~ , Respectively 1
DALLAS, TEXAS H.J. GRUY AND ASSOCl~TES, INC.
LO CAL GEOLOGiC NORT HW~sr SOUTHEAST CO~U MN A A' M I D -CON~ I NENT P~ TR OL.E: 'J M GU..FO'lCO RP
'-; C ' C "M: l " t o s ~
C"OAP COMANCHE PEAK No
- Souo 11r1 (:**eei.. Cott1e STEAM ELECTRIC STATION
( PROJECTED INTO LINE OF SECTION ) BA St LOWER CRETACEO US
\ )
;soo' I
--~.~. --r---, i' t
**z::
6 3 Miles
~L I r
*~
z
~I {
i . DATUM 2000 SUBSEA < z
~ I >
...J
! i >-
I/) l j I* r l~ z w z a.. 1~l - i I
~
I I
\_
?
I J' ' 4)00' TOP EL L £~8U AGER NOTE: See Figure 2.5.l-23A for location of cross section. z u COMANCHE PE AK S. E. S. ~ 0 FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 HOOO ANO SOMERVEL L COUNT!ES , T EX AS VE RTICA L SCAL[ ,NFEET Northwest To Southeast
/\MEiWMENT 2 Structural Cross Section A-A' JULY 27, 1978 FICiURE 2. 5.1-30
SOUTHWEST NORTHEAST B B' I -' I LEVEL soc'
'[
I 1000' i > I 1500'
., z DATUM 2oco' SUBSEl
~ ~
<{ '
_J (/) z z w Q.
. 3000'
'1 "- i
( * *~
' 3500' .. 4000 '
f_.4500' NOTE: See Figure 2.5.l-23A for location of cross section . lsooo' COMANCHE PEAK S. ES FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
- 5500' UNITS 1 and 2
~
HOOD AND SOMERV ELL COUN TIES, TEXAS VERTICALSCll.L EiN FEEi Southwest to Northeast O 1QC 20 C~ C ~ ?C AMENDMENT 2 Structural Cross Section B-B' HORI ZON TAL SC ALE l>.SNOTED lr 6000 ' jLJL Y 27, 1978 FIGURE 2.5.1-31 H J *~R U f ANO ASSOCIATE S ' INC
v
~ <,
r~ KC: Y .
~-
- - PA L UXY S ANO /GL EN ROSE CONTOU R
- - - - GLEN ROS E MAR KER BED
\
\, __
)(
96o"
' ~'
.?:fo~ I\ / IO
-7..::-
DATUM : BASE PALUXY SAND/TOP GLEN ROSE LIMESTONE
\. \.
CONTOUR INTERVAL 25 FT. X=OUTCROP POINTS 0 I 2 Ml.
--~~~--~~ ====='
K, . 1
~ ""~'
l_ ___ /- 1 >>--==~~ Amendment 67 February 5, 1988 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 STRUCTURE MAP OVERLAY UPPER GLEN ROSE MARKER BED ZONE I/ZONE II FIGURE 2.5.1~32
-<): JACK GRYNBERG & ASSOCIATES
" HOOPER N0.2 D
"- A GULF 01 L CORP
~ '<(-. c.L.CAMPBELL No. 1 GULF OIL CORP. -\:}......_
D.McINTOSH
! NO . 1 '- . . . .
I\ /
~ Ml D-CONTI NENT PETROLEUM CORP. B--
~ SQUAW CREEK CATTLE CO. NO. l ./-\__ "- INDEX TO STRUCTURAL CROSS-SECTIONS
~ W. I. D. #2 /-V B.M. FITZGERALD VAN MORRISON NO.l PALEOZOIC I // W.I.D. #3 A - A' FIGURE 2.5.1-30 GULF ENERGY AND MINERALS CO.U.S.
OTIS ROLLINS NO.l I I / efDALLAS PRODUCTION CO. B - B' FIGURE 2.5.1-31 Ac BEN J. TAYLOR I // HUBBARD NO.l CRETACEOUS WIGGINS NO.l I / W.I.D. #14 C - C' FIGURE 2.5.1-34 W.I.D. #12 / I D - D' FIGURE 2.5.1- 33 0 .... I ~ --f- VICINITY GEOLOGIC MAP GULF OIL CORP. (R.D.ALLEN) 1 r J FIGURE 2.5.1-10 AND BRATTEN RANCH N0.1-A _ _ _ _ _ --0,.. CPS~S
~- THE BARON CO.\ t I OUTCROP STRUCTURAL MAP GULF ENERGY A~D MINERALS CO.U.S. 1~ NELON7, 0.1-B /
+- - FIGURE 2. 5.1-32 BRATTEN RANCH. 7 W. I.D. # 21 \ AND RELATED CRETACEOUS MAPS 1
/ \ SINGER-LAYNE TEXAS I / \\TEXAS UTILITIES WW N0.1 I \ C' I ,,. \ ~
DE SOTO 0 IL CO. I ;'0 c,O. c,O. \ OIL PROSPECTORS (C.H.KADANE ET AL)
<;/ \\~~'-1~-yv M.M.BUNT ET AL NO.l
\\\
B. W. WANN NO. 1 \
/'00~ 0 1 2 3 4 SCALE IN MILES
\ /_,,/ \ AMENDMENT 4 JANUARY 31, 1979
\ 5 MILE RADIUS \ \ \
COMANCHE PEAK S.E .S.
\ NUCLEAR PLANT
\
\ L PLYMOUTH (M.E.DAVIS)
T.H. COUSINS NO.l
\
~
"r-'
A' UNITS 1 and 2 STRUCTURAL CROSS-SECTION LOCATIONS FIGURE 2.5.1-33
10 5 0 MILES 5 MILES GULF ENERGY & MINERALS CO. U.S. SITE OTIS ROLLINS NO. 1 W.I.D.#12 WEST c BEN J. TAYLOR C'
~
0 WIGGINS NO. 1 EAST 0 1000 GAMMA RAY Gt.. P4 SINGER-LAYNE TEXAS 100( g~ Ctv;/-U)(y TEXAS UTILITIES
- 0st~4N l..1 'lJ 0 WATER WELL NO. 1
~
"1£~ 0 ONt
~~
900 900 RESISTIVITY
~~ ........
OIL PROSPECTORS (C.H.KADANE ET AL)
....... '---.. M.M. BUNT ET AL NO.I
........ 0
.L' 800 ',<olV£ I < -¢-
<o~' ~
800 V£ !~, ............... t-
~
"-- 0 w t-
~
~
glf lg 700 700 _J w _J
~~SELF<.
> w w > _J RESISTIVITY w POTENTIAL _J w U1 N r 9r < w 600 9,.. <.Otv,tOtvt 1,,a k: 600 ~ > w 0 > co 0 < 11,b CD ct: z g~ 0 z: 0 t- < ~ > 500 w 500 ~ _J w w 0 _J 0 w
'° LINE-OF-SECTION: INDEX MAP FIG. 2.5.1-33 400 400 GAMMA-RAY AND RESISTIVITY LOGS CORRELATED AMENDMENT 4 300 WITH LOGS OF CORE BORING P-10 AT SITE. JANUARY 31, 1979 300 (FIG. 2.5.5-17)
COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S. 0 NUCLEAR PLANT 0
'° UNITS 1 and 2 200 200 CRETACEOUS STRUCTURE WEST TO EAST CROSS-SECTION C-C' FIGURE 2.5.1-34
15 10 0 MILES NORTHWEST SITE SOUTHEAST JACK GRYNBERG &ASSOCIATES HOOPER NO. 2 D <> D' GULF OIL CORP. GAMMA RAY C.L. CAMPBELL NO. 1 0 W.I.D.#2
<>- MIO-CONTINENT PETROLEUM CORP.
SQUAW CREEK CATTLE CO. NO.l 800 800 0 0 -<)- o*- SINGER-LAYNE TEXAS TEXAS UTILITIES WATER WELL NO. 1 700 GAMMA RAY 0 700 0 0 SELF POTENTIAL RESISTIVITY 0 I- ~ SELF POTENTIAL *o 0 _s:- 1-600 kg ~
~
600 _J w k~£ RESISTIVITY _J w w ZoN£ >
~~>
_J w _J c:( ~ c:( 500 w 500 ~
~
> 0 w 0 0 > co (V'\
~ 0
~Cfo110 c:( cc
~~2:=
c:(
- z:
0 :z: Pc,l't!tsJz //~ 0 ~
~
~ w 400 400 ~ _J w
//41}'f Jl;t w
_J g~L 0 0 w l.J\ LINE-OF-SECTION: INDEX MAP FIG. 2.5.1-33 300 0 0 l.J\ c__ 300 200 GAMMA-RAY AND RESISTIVITY LOGS CORRELATED WITH LOGS OF CORE BORING P-10 AT SITE. c 200 AMENDMENT 4 JANUARY 31, 1979
>~
(FIG. 2.5.5-17) COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. NUCLEAR PLANT 0 UNITS 1 and 2 0
'° CRETACEOUS STRUCTURE NORTHWEST TO SOUTHEAST CROSS-SECTION D-0' FIGURE 2.5.1-35
3
"'Tl z
)> (")
l' Cl c
- lJ m
I G"> rT'1
;:o V>
3: rT'1 (/) c z- ri:i ro (/)~
)> )>
z ZONE 0 - NO DAMAGE (/) -I (") ZONE 1 - MINOR DAMAGE N (/) l'Tl 3:
...... -I cn
-< I ZONE 2 - MODERATE DAMAGE
<.Tl N
- z ('""')
)>
- z ......
;:o ~z OJ )>
)> m
-u ZONE 3 - MAJOR DAMAGE I (/)
1--' CJ :;:><;: ::::i !:::( m
-0 a.. (/) )>
rT'1 3: N (/)A
;:o )>
- ><;
- '"CJ
...... :0 (/)
- z m* SOURCE: Algermissen and Perkins, 1973 (64)
(/) -u !TI 0:0 .(/)
-I
100° 95° 90°_"~---
'\
I
../
- --- ----"\
I
\
35°---+- 0 100 200 SCALE IN MILES LEGEND
............. ISOSEISMALS e LOCATION OF INTENSITY REPORTS COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.
FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT o EARTHQUAKE EPICENTER UNITS 1 and 2 I-XI I INTENSITY (MODIFIED MERCALLI) 1882 BONHAM (PARIS) TEXAS Doceka 1 ( 69) EARTHQUAKE ISOSEISMAL MAP FIGURE 2. 5. 2-3
g90 92° {' '"'"" d LIMIT OF FELT AREA Marksville (f L,. 0 MI SS!SS I P:I
* ~ ~o a-..._ 3 0
~-* *-*-*----~*-:-1 0
"' ~o *
~
... 3 St. Francisville I _ IV 4 4 0 2
0 IV - V
- 0 JOO 0
3-4 Thibodaux 0 GULF OF MEXICO LEGEND: 4 Denotes Rossi-Forel int ensity at reporting location I-IV Denotes range in Rossi-Forel intensities intensities reported in contoured area 0 20 40 60 Miles SCALE COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 1930 DONALDSONVILLEt LA.
REFERENCE:
Neumann (24) EARTHQUAKE ISOSEISMAL MAP FIGURE 2. 5. 2-4
10s* 106. 104. 102. 100° 98. 95* sp:;;~ I ~~* *1*~ 6 \ oWol~ I (./) C) c z
~
36l I I I l I I I ~ .. nTalo4o..
\
I ~36'
- o
{'") t:tJ rr oJv.g. .
.J oft.Wt**~ 1 lfanV"in0 I I ~ 1 cO I 0
K H I z ~
~--
- Albuj[Uerque I r"~*~
o 11J.cum.o CD t:tJ c: z(/) o.gu Ena.ncia 3 l'.l> H
~
St.JoJuu . w MI E xI In 1011...u...
- I I" I
- I H OTo t:tJ 34*
('/) oSocorro l'.l>
- I 0..
~ I I oGlobe I I I I r-n.A.-ru.g x I I .... l I oLubbock
~
_J .I oela.irem t co 0 0.. CD (/) H Cll I I f o.A.bik= 1I. Fort'
. -*:-r ~~.,
Tucson. *
- o 0 32* Baird I
- o ~ Vl 0 l" '" -
-I t:-1 )>
-I c:
0 Oden. W*s* \ N
-...J
-I JT1 V1 0
T ( 5on AJ>.g*~'f ___J
- x - - I ~,,_-
r- ....0 I
---t--
JT1 IV II , Ill Vl 0 Auet1~ AUG. 16 VIII
-~cl>:_.~
...,, z
)> ()
______J 0 o San A n.:tonu. I ~I~ ro
*/"~"""
cs c ::x::
~ (J) ~ *
~ ..0 ..... c ~ )> **1 ____ /
'°
- c~w zmZ
<<l-- J-28' *---
--- I I I \.\. I J __:Y;l1/'--i2'd'
- ><
- ..... - -1 ()
N
- rn
- e:: < I I El .xr
..... ...,, m 01 (J) )>
JMf oc IC I 0 N I 01 (./) 0 (./) rn -i (./)
-i
..... rT1
....... z CJ
)>
~ )>
-0 m I o .fonine>
(./) >< o... (J) 7'
$~ N (J) r ::u (/) 1-t----..-J___ I 3: mm
-0 .
I 16' I I I I I I
- I ~::.2J.-l~26'
~
0 (f)
" ::u .
-l I 110. 108° 106° 104. 102' 100'
ELL IS /
/"
\,'/
HILL 1
\ NAVARRO 32°N ----;-~--;--:t~~~~:-::--:_::---:------~~~-----_);.
J<. ----
~ ... - -
90/' LIMIT 0 F FE L.T ARE A
/llards (33), ' /' .
,f\ ) \/ ANDERSON
/ / 1.1 f-*-- - \
\,'(l// TEHUACANA \.
\ -~
( k~'\* NOAA EPICENTER(l19 ! 1~x1A ~
)
'\ 1
\
1 I s M 6I
- PRAgIE HILL
\
LIMESTONE L
./J.. 1
\
\
\
0 TUGfil
/
e DOCE KAL .. EPICENTER (69) -"/"" F R E E T 0 N E ..
/-
C LENN AN GROESBECKO
' ' ' ../ ,, ,,.. ,,. /
/,
,,,./ \ \ ,,,./
, \ -;;?ORNTON
/ \ ~
\
I FALLS ),-// LEON
// ~'
,/-< ROBERTSON \ _,,-' ~----
310N ~~~~----~,_-.-k--------i..._' ~-"'---+-------"
/ \\ I /*~,
MADISON I I I \
~ ~
MILAM ' / I I . I COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
.,,,. OIL OR GAS FIELD UNITS 1 and 2
~-------- --*
FAULT, HACHURES ON 1932 WORTHAM-MEXIA EARTHQUAKE DOWNTHROWN SIDE LOCATION MAP FIGURE 2. 5. 2-6
AFTER BRAZEE (1972) Ref. 2.5-88 v 0 5 10 15 20 AREA OF MMIV OR CREATER 25 30 35 40 4.5 (1000 SQ MI) A. Felt Area - Modified Mercalli Intensity Relationship for Eastern and Central U. S. Earthquakes AFTER FLAWN (1970) Ref. 2. 5-89 35 30
*'I I I MEXIA FIELD I I I I OIL PRODUCTION HISTORY z
0 25 t-< u I I I I I
§c;;" 20 I
"',.J P..11'1 I \
g! 15 I I I I
\
\
\
- cl I
~
10 I \
~ . I I
\.
5 I
.. ~ ... .....
I 0 ii I '-IC-_ 1920 1922 1924 1926 1928 1930 1932 TIME YEARS B. Mexia Field Oil Production History COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 MEXIA EARTHQUAKE OBSERVATIONS FIGURE 2.5.2-7
102* 98° 96° 94° oGoodl d oM.l!rico
*Le
- K 38*
/
i *A.... I
.r~MO.
.-1* - Ak~l *.-;~
I cYellrill<
.....-+-4_;___-"-'--~~i- 36" oCJUroemo t
- 32° Statute Miles 6 8 so 8 Tho L
cBun 30" Rr~* 30* 100° 98° 96" 94* 92* COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 1952 EL RENO, OKLAHOMA SOURCE: Murphy,L.M. and Cloud,W.K. (27) EARTHQUAKE INTENSITY MAP FIGURE 2. 5, 2-8
100* 99* 98" 97* 96. KANSAS 37* 36" 36. OKLAHOMA Limits of Felt Area 35' 35* TEXAS 34* 34* 3J" 33* 3 0 100* 99* 17 June 1959, 04:27:07 CST 60 80 100 32* Scale of Miles "8. 97* 96" COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 SOURCE: Eppley,R.A. and Cloud,W.K. (93) 1959 SOUTHERN OKLAHOMA EARTHQUAKE ISOSEISMAL MAP FIGURE 2.5.2-9}}