ML16180A436

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
FSAR Amendment 107, Figures - Chapter 2, Part 1 of 4
ML16180A436
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak  Luminant icon.png
Issue date: 02/01/2016
From:
Luminant Generation Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML16042A346 List:
References
txx-16006, CP-20160003
Download: ML16180A436 (119)
v • d • e


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:NEW ME.XICO SITE COORDINATES TEXAS GRID (FEET) U.T.M. GRID (METERS) (ZONE 14) LATITUDE LONGITUDE UNIT NO. 1 Y=229, 723. 96 X=l,911,921.11 N=3,573,903 E=614,393 32°17 1 52.02 1 1 97°47 1 06.15 11 ooo. 1t*I'~~~' O\\O lO

  • O
f. 0 fl O i...ol-.*.............. ___.* --...

Miles UNIT NO. 2 Y=230,0l0.86 X=l,911,951.27 N=3,573,991 E=614,401 32°17 1 54. 85 11 97°47 1 05.79 11 OKLAHOMA o~ c/>-v~ i-}. c,O t.i> 10 SCALE a 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 MILES COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 SITE LOCATION FIGURE 2.1-1

  • ,,,.<Ji'

.~ "\\ "1i T O l.T.~ RY. CO.,._IN TRACK ~------ PROP[R TY LIN[ I SIT[ 8()JNOllT PL ANTACCf SS ROAO -- ROAD EASEMENT ..,.,,.di"

  • ~'?,;

"t /"/ S;->f;>(" ~. . <b; 18Qo 2-00 H£T / / r- / / //// ;---*** "'\\.\\ CREEK RESERVOIR

  • .si'?P.,

\\ AMENDMENT 89 AUGUST 20, 1993 ,.,, *. <P' ..,.,.,.<P'

\\

  • ~

\\ \\ ~ TOl.T.* 1. F. RT.CO...... ~

,t,,.

  • t""'.p>
  • "<fl'

.JO \\ ( { r;";r~.... 1100 ZltOO FUT

i;a;;;;;I

... \\"l._..('//l ._.\\ / / / V?// ./ \\.\\ .r> J '-\\'-.\\. \\. ~-f, \\

  • ~

\\

  • .-\\

\\ \\ \\ \\__ AMENDMENT 87 DECEMBER 18, 1992

  • t '<Jf'

..,i,o' .. tt1*<il' ,tt<Jf' COMANCHE PE AK S. E. S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UN ITS 1 and 2 OWNERSHIP OF SURFACE RIGHTS IN THE EXCLUSION AREA FIGURE 2.1-2 A LEGEND .\\ \\ c:~ ~' ~ TOA.T.&1.F. ll'f.CO.... ~ EXCLUSION AREA PLANT ACCESS ROAD LONE STAR GAS 6" PIPELINE WEST TEXAS GULF 26" OIL PIPELINE .,,,.<fl' \\.\\ .\\ \\ _/ .r,,.1(- ~.<l>, 1800 HOO F"HT =:;I ,._it* *cr:P -~ \\ .0 SQUAW CREEK .\\ "\\

  • ..-~

.\\ .\\ .\\ ~ \\ \\ \\ \\__ AMENDMENT 87 DECEMBER 18, 1992

  • i"'"""

COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. Ft.JAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 EASEMENTS WITHIN THE EXCLUSION AREA FIGURE 2.1-28 lUllll ucu111* ~ l'lMT.-cct:SS- -SS '"<0 EGAE SS lllGHTS fOlllH<EllALlllTUlt:HS OUTITAIOOlllG ~ ~ \\ \\ -~ \\ ~:4J, "\\ IMMSS P:Olt llt!N("AL EX!tl<>f'ATION MAY IE ~' .... J...,.fT ~'\\ '\\ \\ "\\ "J \\ "J \\ \\ \\ \\ \\_ AMENDMENT 89 AUGUST 20, 1993 .. i."1'1*"" .. '!.)**"" COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S. FNAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 EXCLUSION AREA MINERAL RIGHTS Fl(JLff 2.1-2 C~ \\ \\ l, 1 e,,.... KEY: I [ fl \\kb!i -MATED 1976 POPULATION V f40" CTED 1980 POPULATION I ) J ~ P lJECTED 2000 POPULATION I iJ~ ~ ) '~'\\.-

  • NOTE 1970 AND PROJECTED 2020 POPULATION

)-'.) FROM 0 TO 1 MILE IS NIL --L# SCALE IN MILES 3 1434 NNW GRAFORD* I I I WNW f!f:I; I 11: @STRAWN

  • 0GORDON I r---

w '_J_ MINGUS --T-PALO PINTO COUNTY ~U~Y -Z l~PAN \\ 1 I l I I I I .,.,,.,._.... ) c,O~ c,"'-"'30-< ~% \\ ~o'°"'"' \\ ~ COMANCHE \\ \\ ERATH COUNTY ~i~~ ~¥~ ~DUBLIN SW // / / ,../\\ / \\ ~.- \\5.,12 c,o'°> ~ ~~'\\~/ ~/ \\ \\ \\ ) ~c.;;;,"'~('" c,0'1-":J:.c,%.,,.c.O'° //y.~"" HAMILTON~ SSW N 750 -m- -~,.- \\ ,..,.."\\ c,O'°~-{~.?"" \\ '?-~~...,~~~~~ \\ ,,,./ .:m-s MO~GAN \\ \\ .CLIFTON NNE -- -----r~i&:~~N~,- - -- -- 1 ~WHITNEY I I I I I DALLAS DALLAS COUNTY -"EwscoU"NTv ~AXAHACHIE MAYPEARL ~*1~~ N"r HILLSBORO r /

  • ABBOTT

/ / (bWEST E q,ITALY //" // c.0'ff>-'/ 0~ \\ \\ ESE KEY : 20 ESTlto!ATE D 1976POPlJLATI ON ~F&Jl:X'TE0138CPOf'IJ!.A.T!ON 60 PJl0J[CT£0 2000POPUlAT I ON REFERENCE : THE BASE f OR THIS MAP WAS PREPARED F ROM PORTIONS OF THE FOLLOWING U. S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY I

  • 250,000 MAPS ABILENE, 1954, REVISED 196!5 BROWNWOOD, 1954, REVISED 1964 DALLAS, 1954, REVISED 1963 SHERMAN, 1954, REVISED 1963 WACO, 1954, REVISED 1963 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 POPULATI ON DISTRIBUTION BY SECTOR-AREA lOTOSOMILES FIGURE 2.1-4 -..1,>:~,)**-*../"} L \\

~*~--:.**~"> *- \\

\\~\\r~ ) t '<:::*. \\J\\ \\ ) \\.,'\\ \\,* I ~~- 1.J.~ 32°17 130" ~*"

  • ~*.

,"/ \\ i \\,. - \\, \\" 97°47'.JO" \\ J/ 97°47'30" ---\\.-..... - r., *.\\**r\\_.-r:.:.* """"'.* -~.~ ~-~----.--.~_- .. -...... :.:.7 \\} i-

  • Z<~ t ~.*.r.,
  • \\*****-~!:'( **... ' \\\\r,r 1 r/'--

. / '1 ,\\ *,"\\.:it..****..... 01 co*oo*l/ 1 .~",\\\\ ~._ii:.\\I ) \\ \\.. ?f~ r 1\\~ *

f

_,.. \\~' _1* -~~,{( ~:-*/\\ t ~* ~ '" Jt, I t\\ f \\\\

  • -t:-: ' f'..

.'II,_,_.\\ I y' ,\\' ' .,1:* *,\\ j I 10.. I ! ",,zp~x -~ \\' ~ r . r_ l 'o\\ \\ I \\ ~ ;/!-* '* ' ) _;..... ) \\\\ -> *.

~ '. 1* ~ ' j(-

. '>,*,\\\\. :*~*~/ ~'.>';). {~:;"(1 \\ -*~ ) \\, !\\-;; I NE LEGEND ~ t'. --~~+1~1 \\ .. ~-,_..:A r, ~ .~ '") --.,.

\\'

~ "~ J. \\ ~.. \\. \\ PROPERTY LINE EXCLUSIOll AREA -*~. .:~~i~.~~~~-,~1~~r ,*~ ~~p,_,, ... -~ ~-..... ~. -,. )'

    • ~.~ ). }:/

I ./'./:,Y"' \\* _.., ,.... -**.. y . *: /1" ..... ic._, 32°17* 30" '.:{;'.,-~Hf~::~(... **.' I ~~-,f\\.. u(_ /' '..... _J~~:::t:(.> -~-:.} KM.I ~

  • , ~-

{ l\\ \\~\\_I, *.. \\ \\ \\\\I \\., ~.\\ .' \\ ,..~.\\."-*.*... /.\\ ... :.¥

    • --.:.:*****,_"'.,,:'cl

~

  • <.;<,,,~<

AMENDMENT 53 I IHLI _Y. .. ~, " NOVEMBER 5, 1984 I I COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 LOW POPULATION ZONE 0-4 111LES FIGURE 2,1-5

10,000,000 f-5,000,000 - f-1,000,000 f-,_ 500,000 z: 0 ;:: c( 0 "- w 100,00 c( f-f-

E:

u 50,000 10,000,_ --,_ 5,000 I-I- I-1,000 I 0/0 ASSUMED UNIFORM POPULATION DENSITY 0/ OF 500 PEOPLE I SQUiRE MI~ / 0 I ~ty /0 I 0 / I/ --0 0 I I /0 I l/~ 0 I / CPSES CUOJLAnVE POPULATION 0 CURVE, 1980 I 0 0 I I I l 0 I I 0 0 I 10 20 30 MILES FROM CPSES SITE 40 50 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 1980 CUMULATIVE POPULATION FIGURE 2, 1-6

10,000,000,_ I 5,000,000 : /0/- --+ 0 ---~ ~ ASSUMED U_NI FORM POPULATI ON DENS ITY i / ,_ OF 1000 PEOPLE I SQUARE MI LE 0 ~/ 0 0 / 1,000,000 ~ //

0----t------1 500,000 ~--+---+---I------+---;-

---1---------+----l----~ v II I 1t 100,000 1--~------1----1-- 1

l----1--:-/+---+I----+-- --+--

I 0/ I 50.ooo I----- ---1-1 lK I I 1-l0 / CPSES CUMULATIVE POPULATION CURVE, 2020 ~ 10,000 l-=----+-4--1---- / ---4-------+-----+-- - *-+---- - - -+--- 0 5,000 ~----++--+---+-----+-----+----+----+-------I i 0 0 I 1,000 1..------11-.&.---'-----.l....---_J,.----'----.l....-----J 0 10 20 30 40 50 MILES FROM CPSES SITE COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 2020 CUMULATIVE POPULATION FIGURE 2.1-7

(EA~Th /.(WEST *. *.* .:RE.FUELING. TRACKS . : AR-1028. KEY AIRPORTS ~~: REFUELING TRACKS i: VICTOR AIR LANES AMENDMENT 82 JULY 31, 1991 REFERENCE : This map was prepared from portions of aectional aeronoutieal charts, San Antonio a Ft. Worth. 0 STATUTE MILES 10 20 COMANCHE PE AK S. E. S FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 AIR TRAFFIC O TO 20 MILES FIGURE 2, 2-1

e Ml OLAND TEXAS 0 K LAH OM A. DALLAS FORT* W~RTH \\ ~I :BILENE WACO I;; SITE 0 \\~ L _ _::':__J 300 NORTH SAN ANTONIO STATUTE MILES 0 100 200 --l COMANCHE PE AK S. E. S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 CLIMATOLOGICAL STATIONS AND REGION FIGURE 2. 3-1

Reference:

Holzworth, G.C., 1972 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 AIR POLLUTION POTENTIAL NUMBER OF DAYS IN 5 YEARS FIGURE

2. 3-2

FORT WORTH CLEBURNE SCALE IN MILES 0 20 40 60 80 DALLAS 100 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 LOCAL METEOROLOGICAL STATIONS FIGURE 2.3-3

SCA L E IN MILES 0.5 1 -***---=====--1 ~" ~ 0

1000 NW Cf) 900 ~ i--: LL 800 z 0 i= <i 700 w _J w 600 5 4 -s 2 1 0 DISTANCE FROM 1000 NNW (/) ~ 900 I-' LL z 800 0 I- <i w 700 _J w 600 5 4 3 2 1 0 DISTANCE FROM SE SITE GRADE 1 2 3 4 STATION (MILES) SSE SITE ~ GRADE Ci:

i.....

~ -..J ~ 1 2 3 4 STATION (MILES) 1000 900 800 700 600 5 1000 900 800 700 600 5 (/) ~ i--: LL z-0 I- <i w _j w

J

(/) ~ LL z 0 ~ <i w _j w COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 TOPOGRAPHIC CROSS SECTIONS (CORRESPONDING TO RADIALS SHOWN IN FIGURE 2. 3-4 FIGURE

2. 3-5

1000 w 3 Cf) 900 ~ - I-LL. z 800 0 I- <( 700 w _J w 600 5 1000 3 (/) 9001 WNW ~ f--'. LL. z 800 0 ~ <( 700 w _J w 6005 4 3 2 4 3 2 SITE GRADE 1 0 1 2 DISTANCE FROM STATION (MILES) 0 SITE GRADE RESERVOIR 1--- SQUAW CREEK W%'1 DAM 2 DISTANCE FROM STATION (MILES) 3 4 3 4 1000 E

i"

(/) ~ 900 ~ ~ ~ V) ~ ~/- ESEI 5 800 700 1000 900 800 700 600 I-LL z 0 i== <( w _J w

i" Cf)

~ r-: LL. z 0 i== <( w _J w COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 TOPOGRAPHIC CROSS SECTIONS (CORRESPONDING TO RADIALS SHOWN _____ IN FIGURE 2. 3-4) I FIGURE 2.3-6

1000 SW ':J (f) 900 ~ - i-: u... 800 z 0 j:: <t 700 w _J w 600 5 4 3 2 1 0 1 DISTANCE FROM STATION (M ILES) 1000 '.]' WSW (f) ~ 900 SITE i-: GRADE LL z 0 800 I- <t 700 w _J w 600 5 4 3 2 1 0 1 DISTANCE FROM STATION (MILES) NE 2 3 4 5 ENE ~ ~ ~ V) ~ ~ Cl:) 2 3 4 5 1000 ':::J (f) 900 ~ i-: u... 800 z 0 j:: <t 700 w _J w 600 1000 900 800 700 600 ':J (f) ~ ~ LL z 0 I- <t w _J w COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 TOPOGRAPHIC CROSS SECTIONS (CORRESPONDING TO RADIALS SHOWN IN FIGURE 2. 3-4) FIGURE 2, 3-7

1000 s ~ (/) 900 ~ -

s::

r: ii: LL 800 z ~ 0 I- ~ 700 ~ w _j w 600 5 4 3 2 1000 ':J SSW ~ (/)

s::

~ 900 ~ I-LL ~ z 800 0 ~ I- ~ <( 700 w _j w 600 5 4 3 2 N SITE GRADE 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 DISTANCE FROM STATION (MILES) NNE SITE GRADE 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 DISTANCE FROM STATION (MILES) 1000 ':J (f) 900 ~ -r: LL 800 z 0 ~ 700 w _j w 600 1000 900 800 700 600 ':J (f) e ~ LL z 0 I-w _j w COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 TOPOGRAPHIC CROSS SECTIONS (CORRESPONDING TO RADIALS SHOWN IN FIGURE2.3-4) _____ _ FIGURE

2. 3-8

N WAXAHACHIE ~ 0 10 20 30 40 L I =ti COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 GEtlERP.L TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES TO 50 MI LES FIGURE 2,3-9

NW / SW 10 METER 60 METER N s NE E SE COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 WIND DIRECTION FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS AT CPSES FIGURE 2. 3-10

w N s -- DALLAS LOVE FIELD (1 MAY 1972 - 31 DEC. 1972) ---COMANCHE PEAK (15 MAY 1972 - 31 DEC. 1972) COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 WIND DI RE CTI ON FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS FIGURE 2. 3-11

/ _) "~</ * ,,;~J/~~ ~ :--- ~~ ~-------. \\ COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 FACILITY PLAN INCLUDING LOCATION OF METEOROLOG ICAL TOWER FIGURE 2, 3-12

CPSES/FSAR FIGURE 2.3-13 This Figure has been deleted. Amendment 94 August 1. 1996 94

91 CPSES/FSAR FIGURE 2.3-14 This Figure Has Been Deleted Amendment 91 April 15, 1994

91 CPSES/FSAR FIGURE 2.3-15 This Figure Has Been Deleted Amendment 91 April 15, 1994

91 CPSES/FSAR FIGURE 2.3-16 This Figure Has Been Deleted Amendment 91 April 15, 1994

91 CPSES/FSAR FIGURE 2.3-17 This Figure Has Been Deleted Amendment 91 April 15, 1994

N COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 DILUTION FACTORS-LONG TERM (x 10-7 SECONDS/METER3) ____ ___.,O,___TO........ ~.-'-M=I L=E=S __ FIGURE

2. 3-18

s COMANCHE PE AK S. E. S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 DILUTION FACTORS-LONG TERM (x 10-8 SECONDS/METER3) ~---'-O_TO 50 MILES FIGURE

2. 3-19

L EGEN D CATCHMENT BOUNDARY SUB-CATCHMHll BOUNOART

  • * * *SP[Cl/\\l SUS-CATOlMENT FOR SAFE SHUT-DOWN DAM UN-I s~:l~~:;c:~E;T~E~~N~~~CT~;:~~TION GIYENI A U.S. GS STREAM GAIJG!NG STATION NOlE i*:SER~l)IR LEvH Sl!OWN AT 71!!':) THIS IS A f LOOC STllGE ONLY

~MAL OPEAATfNG ~Evh IS eETWE~N 770' ANO n~* " "'~c~ j ~-r,, .').. j

oi 0, "

o.:£} off 1J~ '\\ ,/ COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 S'i'-1\\'., CHEK

~.

ClfilJPE t:.4.. i

d !o ~I~ ~ ~; wi~ ~~ ~ z ii ~i" u

?W I TCHG,EAR BJIL.l?J!::f!_. P LAN - Q P e R'Al"IN C, F LOOR E'L. 83 ~ * ~ 10" UNI T,. '2 8 '.0-W ITC H <'\\b-"'-R i?UI L C> ;N c, p.;. RT "'L A N - OPE'RA TI NC, FL OOR <2? E l e -3!>' - 1 0~ UN IT

  • 1 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S Fiii.AL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 SWITCHGEAR BUILDING ROOF DRAINS FIGURE 2.4-3

COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 TOPOGRAPHIC MAP OF SITE FIGURE

2. 4 -4

1----- \\

1

\\-~ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\

1.

\\ ------\\-- 1 ~\\ ~ r\\ ~ () \\ \\ \\ \\-----1'-- \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ _t \\------.L-----1 0 \\ \\ \\ \\ I \\ J.----\\- \\ \\ \\ l-----1 \\ \\ \\ \\ ~ \\ \\ \\ \\ ~ \\ " \\ \\ \\ \\-------- \\ \\ \\ -- --~ _ _,...,-"/'-\\ \\ ____ ---\\-- \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ -\\-------- \\ \\

\\

}...: \\ \\ \\ \\ + -\\----- 1-------- --- I \\ \\ \\ ---vi81L ENE _J..- - \\ >-!!Pi--- \\ \\ \\ / / \\ / \\.....,--<s-"-""-1\\.,'\\.iv \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ I \\ \\ _.--V - \\- -..J.--- _-r-_ REFERENCE : The base for this map was prepared from a port ion of the Texas Highway map, prepared for Gulf Oil Corp by Rand Mc Nally, 1971 edition, and the Surface -Water Developme nt map of the Texas Water Development Board, November 1968. \\ ~ \\ Iv-~ \\ r- \\ --t \\ I \\..--- "'I ( I I "-.../ I / v---- \\ / I J y t....., / / I I ____ J..., ~ 10 20 30 40 50 Miles / / / / ) ~ \\ \\ / \\-- -- ------ -...__..-5: \\ \\ "-, / l / I-< \\ >\\ \\ I \\_, ...l. /'------.......__; l _.. \\ / ~-l/ \\ \\ \\ \\....- / ',{ c/ +\\ ./' \\ \\ \\; v* r/> o~ COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 TEXAS PORTION OF BRAZOS RIVER BASIN FIGURE 2, 4-5

POSSU.11 K/NC00.11 LAKE APPRO.f/.llATELf ~ 25.ll!LES UPSTREA.11 ~- SHPHrnVILLE ([)'!ST/NCJ ERATH ~ / \\ / \\ // \\ / \\ HAMILTON \\ \\ POSSIBLE FUTURE LA!E ~ EXISTING LAKE SELECTED STREAM GAGING STATIONS m~~JEirif1i~~ITATION REFERENCE The base tor thi s map was prepare d from porf ior-s of U.S.GS 1*2so,ooo quodro nt mops of Abilene, Dallas-Fort Worth, Brownwood and Waco sect ions, BOSQUE TARRANT JOHNSON COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 REG !ONAL TOPOGRAPHIC MAP FIGURE 2, 4-6

COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 SURFACE HATER USER MAP OF BRAZOS RIVER FIGURE

2. 4-7

0 0 0 0 r<> a:: Y*

50

>-0 0 I ~i;_ / 0 0 C\\I 0 IO og111-8 0980-8 (/) w ...J w a:: <I:

J a

(/) u.. 0 (/) 0 z <I: (/)

J 0

I 1-z <I: w a:: <I: w (.'.) <I: z <I: a:: 0 (.'.) ~ 1-m a:: 1-z 0 u aN0::>3S CJ3d 133.:l ::i1sn::>.:lO saNvsnOHJ. NI 3~CJVH::>Sla COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 MEAN ANNUAL, 50 YEAR AND HISTORICAL PEAK FLOODS ON BRAZOS RIVER FIGURE

2. 4-8

160 140 VI 120 b ~ 100 I INFLOW --ti-( I l\\I 80 j!!; ~ 0:: ~ 60 40 20 0 0 10 20 DRAINAGE AREA1 64 SQUARE hllLES DESIGN STORM RAINFALL: 39.1 INCHES DESIGN STORM RUNOFF1 34.1 INCHES 051589027.DGN I I I 30 40 \\ TIME IN HOURS 50 HYDROGRAPHS § 40 ~ 30 0 I 20

i:;,.

~ 10 ~ ~ - 1775 ~ a 130 I I I I ] I I 120 ~n* 780 60 70 80 60 r-----+---H----+---+---!--* 50 I J I ~ ! i A I ----f-t----t-- 779 ~776 SPILLWAY DISCHARCE 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 TIME IN HOURS MASS CURVE ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ z 0 ~ ~ 752 790 788 786 784 782 780 778 776 774 820 800 780 760 740 720 700 680 660 2200' BROAD CREST ~ ~

r-Tl".. l"Ar~78j'...... ~

~O' UNCONTROLLED OGEE

  • ----- -----~

,CRES\\~E~~~~~ SPILLW~-::::: 1 I __.....--::;:::. ? 11 I _V_.--------- '-._ c6t.1BINED TOT AL 1 DISC~ARGE v ;" i I I I I I I I I I I 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 SPILLWAY DISCHARGE IN THOUSANDS OF CFS SPILLWAY RA TING AREA IN THOUSANDS OF ACRES 6 _..).-- ~ I IJ-+-r ~ CAPACIT\\~ 1" J71 ~ v / ~ ARE~=r ~ TOP OF CONSERVATION STORAGE: ELEV. ns.d AREA: 3,272 ACRES -+ 1 -+----+---+-+--+--t-- CAPACITY1150,953 ACRE~FEET I\\ I I I I I I I I I 640 ~~~--'----'--'---'---'---'-----'--__J'---'---'---'---'----' 0 20 40 60 80 100

20 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 CAPACITY IN THOUSANDS OF ACRE-FEET AREA - CAPACITY CURVE COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNIT I and 2 SQUAW CREEK RESERVOIR FLOOD ROUTING AMENDMENT 78 JANUARY 15, 1990 FIGURE 2.4-9

V) u.. u z 0 ....J u.. 5,000.---.-~-.--....... l~~l~--~.----~..----,~~,~----..----~....----~-----

6. 14 Hrs.
3. 45 Hrs.

(_I. ~---+---<fl--+--\\_\\ I---+-- 4, 1 310 ~fs 4,000~--+-~+---l-~-\\+----l~'l--~~~+---+-~-+------+~-+-~I---+-~+---+~ / / ' \\ \\600 71' \\'-J-... U 1 PPER 1 WATERSHED I \\ \\ (38. 01 SQ.I MJ.)I 3,000 ~--+-~~~~~~,~~~-+-~~~~~~~l~~l~~I~~~~~~~~ J ~a. MAX. 6 HOURS ,_ b. REST OF STORM 6 9 TIME IN HOURS 12 15 COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S. NUCLEAR PLANT UNITS 1 and 2 SQUAW CREEK WATERSHED UNIT HYDROGRAPHS FIGURE 2.4-10 2

- i--- ~ i--- ~ i--- ~----- ~* e

J 0

~ c;; E _J w 785 w _J a:: w ~ <l: ~ (/) (/) 790 ~ --- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r---- 'r-* 789 scR at E.\\e-J. ~ -l-- - 788 ---- ,.,,...,,,- ~ ~ ~ - 181 --- ~ .-- /'-- I I L..---' I 780 --- - ~ ~ ~ -~,_....--- ~ i' 18~..- ~ / Crest at 769.5 ~ _l.---___ ~ 4 ~- ~~ / / I~ ~ I._ I 1s~ ~ / 3 3 ~~~/ I 40. ___.----+-----

1si. _.,,;"' / ~*- ~---

. H.....

  • ~ IT i ** ~

~---- v~ _i--- s' _/ // 1,,,,,,

;-;;; ~

/

COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S. ~/ FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT ---~9// ~~~ UNITS 1 and 2 ~:?' Safe Shutdown Impoundment ___.. 11 Yv Spillway j(" Discharge Characteristics FIGURE 2. 4 - 11 780 776 0 5 10 15 20 DISCHARGE IN 1.000 CFS

1f400 l,300 l, 200 l fl 00 1,000 I\\ \\ 900 Vl 800 LL u z 700

s

0 ......J 600 LL 500 400 \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ 2 300 200 100 \\ I I ........... ~ ~ 0 0 2 3 4 5 6 TIME IN HOURS COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. NUCLEAR PLANT UNITS 1 and 2 SAFE SHUTDOWN IMPOUNDMENT UNIT HYDROGRAPH FIGURE 2.4-12

Cl z 0 () w (/) a::: w a.. 1-w w LL. u ro u LL. 0 (/) Q z <l: (/) 0 I I-z 3 0 ....J Li..

ic:

25 YEAR RETURN PERIOD FLOOD POST POSSUM KINGDOM I AFTER COMPLETION OF MORRIS SHEPPARD DAM I <l: 251--~~~-~~~~---.~~--1--+-~~--+~--+~~-+--~--+~---l w a.. _J <l:

> z 151----~~~-+---.,__~---#--+-~~-+~~-+~-+~~-t-~-+~----1 z

<l: 5L-~---L~-41Cl.~~~~_.._~~___.J...~~--L~--l.~~_._~_...~~ 98 90 70 50 30 20 10 5 2 PROBABILITY OF EXCEEDANCE COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 PROBABILITY OF EXCEEDENCE OF ANNUAL PEAK FLOW ON THE BRAZOS RIVER AT STATION 8-0910 NEAR GLEN ROSE FIGURE 2. 4-13

EFFECT IVE FETCH (Fe)

:~: ;~ 2 I. 25 MILES 17.24 EFFECTIVE FETCH (Fe) = g:~i 2

RE FERENCE: ALL WAVE CALCULATIONS ARE DONE ACCORDING TO PROCEDURES PRESENTED IN THE CORPS OF ENGWEERS "COMPUTATI ON OF FREEBOAROALLOWANCES FORWAVESINRESERVOIRS."ETL !l l0-2-8DATEOAUGUST1, 1966, PUBLICATI ON. ~1c, L. \\MILE 0 )KILO METER

371 = = 551 ~ ~ ~ ~ 750 685 ~ - ~ ~ J-u~ 1750 1750 1750 1700 1691 "~ ~ J-1530 woo - - 543 375 324 ~ 350 193 N 230,000 / 860 '-.. _____.// ,) / / '\\,,,-Al N 227,000 \\ I I I \\ _\\ / 4 2° . 743 2 ~ ~ 3 - *- ~ . 914 5 ~ .~ 12° ~ ~ *- 8 ~ L-9 .995 J O 1'o .9 78 ll 180 . ':151 ~ .914 13 - .866 1 4 - *- 15 .H3 1200 1300 14 00 "~ 4~0 4E;o 4250 - ~ 400 J50 892 ~ 1126 1'00 OH 4129 ~ 2543 571 .: SI 346 324 PEAK S. E.S. ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 FETCH DIAGRAM SAFE SHUTD0\\1N l MPOUNDMENT DAM rlGU RE 2. 4-15

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 SPILLWAY DISCHARGE CHANNEL GRADING FIGURE 2, 4 -19

800100 (/) ~ - w 90 100 200 300 Surface Area (Acres) 60 50

~',1 ~-r-:*11.*---,-**1**- *~r---~sn.: :

. I I I " - 11 I 1 I 20 770 ~.. c c

v.

c: , u*

Ii I'

-+~~+++-i-++.L+l-H-h-J+...l.:.811 760 -~ COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT

! 111 UNITS 1 and 2 I.

~. T~W I I 1'740 tl*. J'.

  • l J1: :Jl]TT;rnr* i1[

1 t :1 FIGURE 2. 4-22. I UJ. _:_**.. :.;_;_: '..,, _._'._ l.. ili.JlL._.LJ. ___ L .: c.. L~J.lJ730 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Storaoe Capacity (Acre-Feet) .. c >

  • L&.

UNITS 1 and 2 LAYOUT OF S.S.I. DAM AND RELATED FACILITIES FiGURE

2. 4 - 23

a z 0 (.) w (/) n:: w Cl.. 1-w w LL. (.) CD ~ (.) z 100,000.----.---...,..--...,..---..----.,----...-__,,.---...---...,....-...,..--....--- I 0,000.__--+----+---~r---+-----1---+--+----+-----+----+----+---t l AVERAGE DISCHARGE OF 1,555 CFS I 1 1.000..___rl-~ --r I 100.__--+--+--+---+----1---+--+----~ *----1--+----I-~ I i I

t------------+------1 I

I 0.____- I I I I I I -i--+--------+1-- ---1------*-- l I I I I I I.__ _ 0.01 .I .5 2 10 30 50 70 90 98 99.5 99.9 99.99 PERCENT OF TIME INDICATED DISCHARGE WAS EQUALLED OR EXCEEDED COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 Flow Probabi l i ty Curve For The Brazos River At Station 8-0910 Near Glen Rose FIGURE

2. 4--24

a z 0 u w U) a:: w 0... ~ w w LL. u CD '.:) u z - 3: 0 _J LL 20,000-------------------------------- I i I 10,000 l-----l--l----+--11*-----+-1 --r-1 1* I I 1,000 100 10 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1----+-----+----+--~-+---~ --A~-V-E-R+-AG-E---+D-l-SC~~-E -ti i - 70.8 CFS i I 1 I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I ! -+--: I 1---.+---ie----+---+------+---+----+----l-+---+-*~+---+--~ I 0.1 L.--_.__---' _ _..i.. __ _.___---'-------'----.1----' 98 99.5 99.9 99.99 0.01 .I .5 2 10 30 50 70 90 PERCENT OF TIME INDICATED DISCHARGE WAS EQUALLED OR EXCEEDED COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 Flow Probability Curve For The Paluxy River At Station 8-0915 Ne~r Glen Rose FIGURE

2. 4-25

~------*-*----*----------- -**** *-----------*----- - - I I f I J WV) 0 0~ Z !

,~
1 Ii

~ ~ll! ~-~*-***-- *-- -*----- -* *- I

,/*~ I

'-----~ m~R~RIZsuRY .-------1 t~~~~ATIVE F!R£ 1------ ~~m~TION 1FIC002<t28.DCN AUXILI ARY r-----------I FEEOWATER PUMPS MAKE-UP FROM LAKE GRANBURY TO SAFE r--------------T-- --------; f~~J8~~~ENT 1.FLOWSINCPM. 2.920 GPM OURINC EMERC£NCY TANK FILL -fIT DEalaal.l,1"2 COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 AND 2 PLANT WATER SYSTEM UNI T 1-NORMAL OPERATIONS UNIT 2 - SHUTDOWN AT 4 HOURS

LEGEND ~ OUTCROP OF PALUXY AQUIFER AREA WHERE AQUIFER IS CONFINED REFERENCE The bose mop for this iltustro11on was prepared from portions of U.S.G S. quadrangle mops. for Abilene, Brownwood, Dallas and Waco. N COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 FIGURE OUTCROP OF PALUXY FORMAT I ON 2.HO

REFERENCE The base map for this illustra tion was prepared from portions of U.S.G.S. quadrang le mops for Abi lene, Brownwood, Dallas and Waco. \\ '* N COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 FIGURE OUTCROP OF GLEN ROSE FORMATION

2. 4-31

\\ \\ \\ LEGEND

fl:iJ-- ELEVATION CONTOUR

~AQUIFER OUTCROP REFERENCE The bose mop for this illustrot1on was prepare d from portions of U.S.G.S. quadrangle maps for Abilene, Brownwood, Dallas and Waco. ,,,,/ ! ) '.

~ f-- ----~-!:~~ _'.':":':'.. C_C*:'~~ *r,,

-JCJH NS C)N C ()UN'i" '-1' I r /) .,J COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 ELEVA Tl ON OF TOP OF TWIN MOUNTAINS FDRViATlON FIGURE

2. ~- 32

COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 PUBLI C SUPPLY, I NOUS TR I AL Aim I RR I GA TI ON WELLS 0 TO 20 MILES FIGURE 2.4-33

/ ~ \\ I / H*'. :, ' ~... -........... ~ .,,\\ ,.\\ \\ LEGE N D ---600 Pl EZOMETRIC SURFACE ELEVATION CONTOUR REFERENCE The bou mop for thil i!lu$fro1ion wos prepored from portions ot U.S.G.S. quodranole mops for Abilene, Brownwood, Dallas ond Waco. SITE@ /

  • tt -~

0 N 10 20 MILES COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 PIEZOMETRI C SURFACE, TWI N MOUNTArns FORMATION, S !TE REG I Oil FIGURE

2. 4-34

050 ~ 0 DOMESTIC WELL fJ. STOCK WELL A36 THE BASE FOR THIS MAP WAS PREPARED FROM PORTIONS OF THE FOLLOWING U.S.G.S QUADRANGLE MAPS HILL CITY, 1961 NEMO, 1961 17A 21A 034 16A 15~ 330 0 0 ~: 0 30 29 02a 0,27 013 O~s isp

  • ,\\

042 47A 0 . 48 046 430 \\ \\ \\ 04~ Q41 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 FIGURE WATER WELLS, SITE VICINI TY 2.4-35

.../;_.. / ~..(';~ '~. REFERENCE : THE BASE FOR THIS MAP WAS PREPARED FROM THE HILL CITY, 1961, U.S.G.S. QUADRANGL E. 0 ~- __,,,..._ @SITE 2 MI. COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 FIGURE PIEZOMETRIC SURFACE, TW IN MOUNTAINS AQU IFER, SITE VICIN ITY

2. 4-36

~ N I \\ 0 SCALE IN MILES !5 PW (CPSES Production wells) z 0 (fJ z

  • x

.J~ OB (CPSES Observation wells) 50-402 (TWDB Observation wells) Plant Site COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 LOCATION OF PRODUCTION AND OBSERVATION WELLS FIGURE 2.4-37

_J _J w 3 Cl w Cl.. Cl.. 0 a:: u.. I-w w u.. 10 ---- 9 -- 8 --- 7 --- 6 5 --- 4 --- 3 2 --- 0 0 0 0 Q ____ 9 -- 8_ 7_ 6 -- 5 _ 4 __ 3 -- 2 __ 0 0 o_ 0 9 - 8 -- 7 6_ 5_ 4_ 3 2 - 0 0 0 \\ (133.:l) NMOOM\\fHO COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 DISTANCE-DRAWDOWN CURVES TRINITY SAND (TWIN MT.) FIGURE

2. 4-38

a:: ~~ Cl...c:( lJ.J 3 l-a u.. l.J........... 0 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i 1111'-l. I i I I I I I I I i 210 I I I I I I I I i I I I-I- I-I- H-~ -~I I I I I I r++-"""--- I

  • ---+-- OBSERVATION WELL NO. 3 r-~,...,

~---- ____ -~-*, --.~ -~~ ' -- T - EL. 890 FT. I jo._~.._._..-..-~ '°""-"-i--1o....,._~ 2 2 0 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 190 I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I /" I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I ! v 'N.. a:: I I I I I I I I I I /'- ?~ ~ I I I OBSERVATION WELL NO. 4,

i..--..

200 I EL. 848 ~ i t: I I i\\ I I I I I I I ~ !- 210 i 1 ~T , * ~lt I 1 1 1 1 1 1 111 I I 11 I I I 11 I I I I L 1 1 I 'l l i I I I~ I I I I I I I I I I I 220 10 15 20 25 5 10 15 20 25 5 10 15 20 25 5 10 15 20 25 5 10 15 20 25 5 10 15 20 25 5 10 15 20 25 5 10 15 20 25 I 5 10 15 20 25 I 5 10 15 20 25 I 5 10 15 20 25 JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL UY JUNE JU LY 1975 AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER COMANCHE PE AK S. E. S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 HYDROGRAPH OF OBSERVATION WELLS FIGURE 2. 4-39

  • -"iut

<P'-c/

  • 4*

(,~.

f~N~f~"'i ~r'(.,

t*... -~

~L-*- --- - -~~:::A~~v PiP: ;<;. ~ ~

  • ~

~-

  • _.,_ ____ ~ - -==:~ -* ------..

L -~j~ l UNE4"' '4~ y I

  • " f'\\

-~... L.e:A.v~~ "~ 'f't/l \\"/<XJ'? ~~K l ~,;~ _t"A.£E ~ C~~~l~ WAt..L -------' 10" w. " 1o'b ( NGNu."".c.L) "-'~ 1Ae1.U O.F F'LA'!.ltllt-.4 !Af;T,l..L t.Un~P. .-.it£Uft..cC1 TD COl"C. 4~~4':tl'1'1 PLAN r t ....... --------- O...IUl"S-'7 op~~I Ne; I,~d_ i T.?P 10F C'-'i"IC. ~L..A!!:>:-i ( L. 't*) t>ttull.£ ~TTOl 1V c;.clNG, "'4C B.LOC.t::: I t--4 <:, A. S. ~e~e>. J.t~F. DW G.. 'Z ~'20 ~A\\ ~-o--;o" -~~\\J' & \\~ '° FCJI.. \\.lo~,.S.1~ £.,µ R"Do~- ~ m~ rN>O'* ELEVATION ~l~!I' Q_ tt:All i N~~ 0-: .k- !>Ulli

  • uP

~OOF I N4~ ~ I ~JU.veL Fi~ r<> I _L fJ-~~~,~ (L.P.) e>Loll(tN~" 12~1( al 'vaoo ~OC::KIN~ e:iol..1f'O ~

  • ~

T~ CONC: * --'t-SECTION /f.cTAL CA?e ~~'.:- FLA~J~ / -=.'.\\ETAL tAP FL.J..eHIN.i, JULY 31, 1979 COMANCH~ PEAK S.E.S. FNAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 ROOF DRAINS DETAIL OF RELIEF AND DRAINAGE OPENING FIGURE

2. 4-42

REFERENCE:

RAISZ, ERWIN, 1957, 11LANDFORMS OF THE UNITED STATES A.,.~';\\ c\\\\.1 C, ~c "J>1' ~'---.,,,* "~1A ~

  • M

-v-1J'1*' <..... ~* .. -*.. ~ 1 .~ 0 1.'7[".;;" rn VJ)" 0 f~~rpus

  • K..

lj. ) hr1Jl18ay ~tr1

~_fl Boflins Bay JAN 0 -. ~*

~-~I"'. p L /J. In

\\*.-;:

'" r"'<<>deCil,Y \\~\\~ r~~. ~(~w\\\\ Gut.f t-A~~1CO or SCALE IN MILES 0 50 JOO COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 PHYSIOGRAPHY FIGURE 2.5.1-1

o 11 z

Gl ~I )> () 0 ro z (/) ~ )> r c ~ )> ..,., )> ro 3 Vl zmZ rr ro -i -I () """I :J N ~ -; -< I ca.. "' 3 Ul -i Cf> )> m """I <O '< :J Gl -4 z -u r+ I ~ OJ )> m Ul N ~ m -0

i !:(

I a... (/) )> l.O (""') N (/) co

0 (/)

co (""') 0 mm r -u. c 0 (/) 3:

0.
z Jurassic Pe nnsy l van i an Comanche (Lower Cre to ceous)

Trinity Cotton Volley ~len Rose Formation ~ Hensel member c 0 Caw Creek 0 Pears al I member I c E 0 member 0 IL Hammet1 member ~ 0 E 2 0 c Sligo member u.. 0 I; ~ c c J <{ I- '~:~~::;: -"' a Hosston member 0.. ~ I- ? Mineral Wells Formal ion Paleozoic I Most of Paleoroic rocks undifferentiated, Including Ouachita Focies -+I.,, N N 0 I 0-1500t 0-175+/- -+i C> C> co ci I 0-1 30:t I I~ C> ~ 0-0 l1sso+/- 0- 60t Character of Rocks Silt, 1ome 1and ond grovel Shale, marl and sand Marl and limy shale Chalky limeslone Shale Ferruginous sand, sandstone, shale, sandy shale, clay and some lignite and gypsum Limestone Shale Limestone Shale Hard, fossiti!;<ous~estone (oJren honey* combed), reef molerial, sh ale, chert and dolomite Limestone ond limy shale Shale and calcareous clay --0 c a.. a ~ 0 0 u ~ ~ --0 c ~ --0 " c " c a o 0, 4.n ~ _§ o-a~ u 0 0.. " a c " u: ; t--ine to medium grained sand, shale, sandy ond calcareous shale, some pyrite and iron nodules Limestone, shale -and anhydrite Conglomerate, fine to coarse grained sand, sandstone, si )t.. stone, shale, sandy shale, clay, limy cloy ond limestone c 2 Shale inter-Limestone bedded E with sand I Shale --0 c ~I Limestone a -; Sand a.id Conglomerate, conglomer* fine to coorsa a t ate with sond and sond-E calcareous stone, siltstone, ~ shale, sandy and

cement, c:

shale ond calcareous. shale, 0 u limestone cloy and limestone c D Sands, conglomerate and shale Shale "'ith limestone seams and layers Shale, limestone, dolomite, sandstone, evoporites., and metamorphics

u.. ..J &.tJ

c

<I) z er: &.tJ 1-U) c LL.I HARDE MAL* BASIN UPLIFT ANDARKO BASIN

  • ALSO KNOWN llS "STRMN BASIN" SOURCES:T.ctonic Mop of Taxa1, G*olo9ico l Hlfhwoy Mop of T.. a1, Dollo1 Geolagicol Society, 1963.

T *Cion i ~ Map of *h* Mid*Co"ti"ont R*gion, G*olo9icol Hi9hwoy Map of tho. Mld* Contlnonl Region, A.A.f'.G., 1966 Modified with data from Turner (Ref. 129) 0 I ARKANSAS -;r"/ !!?~ASIN AMENDMENT 7 I IOO r 0 c (/) i> z J> llO JULY 31, 1979 COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S. Flt\\IAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 REGIONAL TECTONIC STRUCTURE FK.Jl.IRE 2.5.1-3

LEGEND QU~TERNARY Qr - Recent Qp - Plei5tocene TERTIARY Tp - Pliocene undiv. Tm-To - M1ocene~01igocene undiv. Tj - Eocene, Jackson Tel - Eocene, Claiborne Tmw - Eocene, Midway-Wilcox MESOZOIC Ku - Upper Cretaceous K1 - Lower Cretaceous PALEOZOIC P - Pennian IP - Pennsy1 vanlan M- - Mi ssippian-Cambrian PRE-CAMS RIAN pt - Igneous and metamorphics AMEi~OMENT 2 JULY 27, 1978 SDUR~7: Te~:~~~f~~aln~~~~:~Y A~6ciation of Petroleum Geolog i sts. 1973 Scale in Miles 50 100 COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 REGIONAL GEOLOGY FIGURE 2.5.1-4

-uoo YOUNG ST[ll'HEllS ftEFER TO FIGURE 2.5.1-23 FOft DETAILED ELLENBURGER IN THE SITE VICINITY. MODIFIED AFTER: TU~NER (~EF.12~) llELL WILLIAMSO.. DALLAS I MC LENNAN L IL... '9 \\ AMENDMENT 7 JULY 31, 1979 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 ELLENBURGER STRUCTURE FIGURE 2.5.1-4a

l&J 12,000 10,000 8,000 ~ 4,000 I A' I CALLAHAN 1 EAST LA N O !CRo*, SPI Ki, I Y.: I i f. i o I SITE IJ i? l MODIFIED AFTER: Geological Highway Map of Texas, The American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 1973. I I SMIT H I WOO U I REFER TO FIGURES 2.s.2-30 AND 2.s.1-31 FOR CROSS SECTIONS IN SITE VICINITY. I A" ~ ! "..,_ I' qo* oo*w

  • 1 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,ooo E 4,000 IL z

2,000 '.j ~~ LEVEL ..J <( 2,000 ~ rr: 4,000 ~ 6, 0CJO e,oco 10,000 A' SITE A" LOCATION OF CROSS-SECTION I:-*.-::-::.:.-"/.'.:.< ! SANDS TON E tLIJ+/-E SA LT ~ SHA L E II M ET A MORPHOSE D ~ ROC KS ~* DOL O M I TE ~GR A N ITE ~ L IME STONE ~ NORMAL FAULT ~ ANHY DR I TE ~ T HRUST FAUL T GRAPHIC ~CAL E V [RT l(Al [Xll G(,( flAl iON 20X AMENDMENT 7 JULY 31, 1979 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 REGIONAL EAST-WEST GEOLOGIC CROSS SECTION FIGURE

2. 5. 1-5

N MONTAGUE I WISE\\ JACK I PALO PINTO I ERATH iHAMIL'I'(>NI MILLS ILAMPA1 BURNET BLANCO s OUACHITA FRONT PROJECTED SAS 0 MUENSTER ARCH

  • FORT 1IORTH BA..CJIN TUSI SITE e -2000 ~/~

z irV~) 1-1 (S / ~ -4000 /-... '--...- -_,. I '-' ~ -6000 H ! -8000 -10,000 "TI z 251~:0 )> ('") ro c 0 fT1 (/) ~

0 I

1:1> c )> )> mg-z~Z -~ N ('") 'fl!! -I ('") -I -< I n (f) )> m Ul i3 :z 0 ..... z '"O V'> ;o I V'> -i ru ~ m 0\\

x
J

~ )> V'> I Q.. f:a ;;ii;;: fT1 V'> no N (f)

! =1
0 V>

0

c mm
z a en
0

-I I c... ):> C3: rrn -<Z CJ W3: ~ JTI ~ z -j ~ \\.D -....J -....J \\.D SCALE IN MILES VERTICAL BXAGGZRATIClf 40X .->aTH-IOUTB GD:Jl.OGIC SECTION ~ QIUWU-*NkX> COUWli, TEXAS MCJBMSTD AllCll TllN)(JG11 ~ UPLIFT

  • ALSO DIOm AS STRAW BASilf INIJEX STRUCTURAL MAP DATUM: TOP ELLENBURGER CONTOUR INTERVAL: 1000 P'T.

MO>IPil:D FIOt TURNER (M:F.129) MODIFIED FROM FIGS 8 AND 14, TEXAS WATER DEVELOPMENT BOARD, REPORT 157, VOL.l, 1972 DPD TO FIOODS 2.5.l-4a AND 2.5.1-23 TllllJ 2.S.l-31 POa l<<>RE DBTAILl!D STltOCTURE MPS LAMPASAS ARCH LLANO UPLIFT "' /I / ,/,,/ /.....:.. I I -.... / /'. Y.T 1 . -.~ /,jr.:!°' ' PRE-- 1,, _,,~~

  • / /...._

CAJIBRIAN v '°:'-~ \\>-... /' APPIWJXIMATE SCALE 0 SOMI. -2000 -4000 -6000 -8000 -10,000 t.a ?i 1-1 ~ tn E H :z: >oJ g

DENSITY FORMATION LITHOLOGY 2 2 24 26 28 0 ~ shole, green, sticky, orogonite concretions ' Q: UJ MIDWAY FM. ~ shale, buff-colored, papery wit'i sandy lominotion~ ...J UJ and concretions I-0.. shale sondv on.d Qloucon itic ~ shole, groy, sticky NAVARRO GROUP sandstone and sandy shale ~-:S morl, gray I ...=-""-i:. marl, block, sticky with sand I en ti Is l ! TAYLOR GROUP ~ chalk, white, hard I ! LL -~- shale, sandy i...J

£~ shale, dork morly, fossiliferous 10 t¥~- cnolk

-~- shale, gray, calcareous, fossiliferous I AUSTIN GROUP cholk, white; marl with glouconite shale, calcareous, minor sand and chalk ~* sno1e, 01ack; tM1n*beaoed sane stone "'I EAGLE FORD GROUP rt~a~ es't~~~y a~dds~~°d~~~nc: 1 ~t~~~tus 5 a ~hb~: e \\

i 0

UJ L:...----=~ sandstone, green, bentonitic; shale, red u WOODBINE GROUP =.:............. ~ - ~*...:.*~ sandstone, brown & white, sholy partings I-

  • ~*:: *. :*.*.

~ UJ ~ shale, gray-block, calcareous witli limestone Q: ,~-=:- u W1.SHITA GROUP 55-stringers, oolitic, dense I .::r--::= FREDERICKSBURG G. ~ shale, black, calcareous; I imestone, fossiliferous PALUXY FM. fh+~ sandstone, with redbeds & minor sha le calcareous UJ

~: ::~ *.: sandstone

/\\ I ~~~ sondstone & siltstone with shaly partings u z .>6::~:* sandstone, ca lcareous ond s i hy GLEN ROSE FM. ~ sandstone with anhydrite end limestone stringers

E anhydrite, mottled, pure, massive

) 0 u limestone, oolitic, sandy, shaly ~-=::=.:. sandstone, calcareous, sholy 4 ~:-:-:::-. )

== limestone, shaly, lossiliterous ii shale, red & gray i sholy sandstone TRAVIS PEAK FM. I (TWIN MTSJ .:_~......=:-- ~-:;-t.-:::+- ~-:o~.::~ ::

  • basal conglomerate with chert pebbles I

~-.;. shale, red, green & gray, I waxy ~- -=-- I I -=----=- ~~-- I COTTON VALLEY FM.....::--_-_ muds tone, varicolored I I ~--- I I u --=---- I ......::::-_-_ shale with dense limestone stringers & minor v:; ~ anhydrite ~~ Q: ~ shale, maroon, red with anhydrite, ~ salt & silty r.UCKNER FM. sandstone strlnaers ~. SMACKOVER LS. ~limestone, brownish gray, crystalline, foss il iferous, dolomite stringers ' ~ NORPHLET-LOUANN"~ redbeds, evoporites, conglomerates 1-°' EAGLE MILLS FM. ? t~~li~ ~ C:f/,.,. ~ OUCH IT A FACIES SOURCE : Crosby, 1971 shale and redbeds, arenaceous shale, limestone, dolomite, sandstone, evoporites, ) and metamorphic rocks Amendment 67 February 5, 1988 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 ROCK DENSITY VARIATION WITH DEPTH FIGURE

2. 5.1-7

--* *c~==---f ~~~~ *--,*--*--- *-*~~--'" -****-~- * -.~.. --,7 -- \\ ; n "\\ * '~ I f; ) ~ ~~;~~~~D L CDA,T -~ / <): 0 F c'H Mlll!GALS) OUlSll Y 2. 67 qm/ cm3

{~FE RCIU

AMEPJ CAN Gt.OPHYS!CAL UNICN (69) E x

1.

c u SCALE !N ~ILES 0 50 10 0 '===-~=~-t=:=~-~ COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 REGIONAL BOUGUER GRAVITY MAP FIGURE 2.5.1 -8

x w 0 z z 0 ;:: ~ ~ x UJ I I I; I ~1~ f-z

J 0

() /

r:

~ oss*osr a:: w

OE SOTO OIL CO. 8.W. WANN NO. I ~ ~5rr~ 9D~~ !iD82 ~0 - 1 DftY a ABANDONED 8/11/!12 Kgr

.A.. PLYMOUTH (N£. DAVIS)

'( T.H. COUSINS NO.I EL. BIODF TOTAL DEPTH 6!110~0-e ORY 8 ABANOOllEO 11/23."I 0 LEGEND QUATERNARY {~ al ALLUVIUM LOWER CRETACEOUS

01:

TERRACE EDWARDS LIMESTONE COMANCHE PEAK LIMESTONE WALNUT FORMATION PALUXY SAND Kgr I GLEN ROSE LIMESTONE ~ v

c.

3 Ml AM[ N[)>!ENT 2 JULY27, 1978 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 VICINITY GEOLOGIC MAP FIGURE 2.5.1-10

LOCAL G[OlOGlt CIXU191 TY, I CAL !.. § TY, I CAL THICKNESS I ; TH I CKNESS IN FUT IN FEET QUATlU*AR' ~ Qal ALLUVIAL DE,OSITS ~ "' 1 Qt ALLUVIAL TEll"-'CES ! I 0 JO Ked EDWARDS LIHESTOME .:: r... Boo ! I u < I .... l s u 100 Kep CO~CHE PEAK LIMESTONE I ~........,,,,. f'../............ -- x 100 l<aol* WALNUT FOll~TIOM (SHALE) ~ I ~ I ~ ~ 100 l(px PALUXY SAND ~ ~ 48oO i ,,,. I

  • LIMESTONE AND SHALE

~ Oil CLAYSTONE ~ LOWER z CUTAC[OUS I 80-90 z J

11.

~SSIVE LIMESTONE u... '~ CL. ~~: C C"l~CME II 60-70 LIMESTONE AND SHALE I~ SHIH I GLEN ltOSE ~* Kgr 111. Oil CLAYSTONE; o--- LIMESTONE I KASSIVE LIMESTONE o~ I 111 60-65 ~ ~ ~..,, 2 IV. LIMESTONE ANO SHALE c;;; ti. i CL. 30-40 j Oil CLAYSTONE IV i ::; l<w u u~.,.; ltOO ~

  • u "'

! ~! i ~ r I Ktm T\\JIN MOUNTAINS SANDSTONE 250 z c ~ :I u " i § g 2500 0 1 PENNSYLVANIAN STRAWN I >55 Pmw MINERAL WELLS CLAYSTONE SERIES (65 FEET OF THIS FORMATION L--: ~ t----- PENETRATED IN SITE BORINGS) ~.; i

s u

u PllE*CAAI NOT TO SCALE Amendment 67 KEY: x EXPOSED FO~TIOM WITHIN 5 HILES OF SITE February 5, 1988 .. STATION SITE POSITION COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S FNAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 LOCAL GEOLOGIC COLUMN FG..f'E 2.5.1-11

vtJ t (( ?!<::{ )

GAMMA RAY 0 40 80 (COUNT /SEC/IN) UJ z: 0 I-V) UJ

E

....I BASED ON BORING P-10

c l-o..

LU Cl 0 50 100 150 200 250 RESISTIVITY UPPER LOWER I ZONE ZONE II I ZONE IIIA I I ZONE IV 58 74 139 158 I ---1---+-1 ---r* --1 2 3 3 I I I I I TWIN MOUNTAINS FORMATION 300 L----~-----'-------'---'-----' 2 9 4 0 100 200 300 400 Amendment 67 February 5, 1988 (OHMS PER INCH) COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 LITHOLOGIC SECTION AT PLANT SITE FIGURE

2. 5, 1-13
  • Oil test - Ory and abandoned
  • Mid-Cont. Petr. Ca.,

Squaw Creek Cottle Co. No. t

  • Fitzgerald Morrison No 1 0

/'"""- ),. Cordova Bend Domsite ~ -<i -v-care TesV V

  • r

\\I I °\\... t I I I Santo Fe RR 0 Water Well No.8 ~ Cleburne I Note Borings at CPSES revealed variable quantities of cloystone (instead of shale) within the Glen Rose limestone and Twin Moun-tains formation I ~:~ - =--r I I I <Y-....._ I y I "'o /I .i\\. I "o~ I ~ I SITE I I

  • R,ve~

I I I\\ \\ I I I I I \\ 1 ./ I BORING I ~ Elev 771 *- ZONE II Elev. 709 - Line of Section Datum ALTERNATING LIMESTONE AND CLAYSTONE PALUXY SAND I MASSIVE LIMESTONE GLEN ROSE -ZONE m IAl~NATING LIMESJ~~s~~~E FORMATION Elev. 646 - *- Elev. 615-ZONE Dl ALTERNATING LI MES TONE AND CLAYSTONE -1 -- --" '~'"" ""'"'"' --::_-,,;.;;;;,;R.NQS """']' anhynte r- --...;:;:::=- pos1t1on - Upper Water Sand I ~dip z l> 0 l/) ro -I l/) ~ (/)~ ....... -I c ~ l> -I...... zmZ rn Gl --{ 0 tn l <:~ -i -< I ....... "'O (f) l> m n::::c ...... z zn Q) l> ""O

i !::( m

-I l/) a.. (/) l> ('"') N (/) 7' -I

0 (/)

0 z mm ""O. 0 (f)

0.

-i ....., )> ro 3 cr ro -s :::s c 0. ll> 3 -s ro '< :::s rt- <..n ~ °' TO 5577 \\£) co co 0 TO 506 TWIN MOUNTAINS Lower Wo ter Sand MINERAL TO 4504 FORMATION (=Trinity or Travis Peak Sand of wo fer well drillers) FORMATION TO 1225 5 10 15 20 ZS HORIZONTAL SCALE IN MILES 0 CD 300 if = .c -

a..,

a

LEGEND: \\ e BORING LOCATION \\ ""'- BEDROCK CONTOURS ~ GROUND SURFACE CONTOURS \\ /) COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 VICINITY BEDROCK CONTOUR MAP FIGURE 2.5.1-15 I

I -/ I g I ~~

8. 1

""-'--'- I I(\\% \\rs~~~!/a ~~)) ) ~\\~\\ ~~~///// '\\. (~ _/ >/ // ~ ~~ -- _,,.,,. / ~//// ,,o// ~**,,,_ II

~---. /

./ I ;j/ --. __../ >11{/;>*-* / / ( ~ / ~~ ~_,.'.'._: 1,0,,8

==---~

~=~~-*~=~-~ \\ -.... ---------. -~ ). i\\ ..,rt. ~r ~ 1/ \\ C l ti*:UL~7!.'lf. ',.,1,1r:t:~ \\ \\ ~ *. -~ ~

r<;AKES.TRUCT UR<

\\ \\ ( ~~ P-14 --~CL)~ SS\\rJ \\ ' \\ ~ P-5 ~ -(,.<- ~ -------.. P-20 *... ~ ~ \\ (L,l)SJ ~, \\ P-29 \\ \\~ ~,-~ -\\- P-2S e~::'5 1& 2 /--,.~~ ~~~ \\ -~. .\\- L-

,~

~ ?,. I ~ ";.,~~. ) I ~ "' """" /.~--,,o~ / /,,,,,--*oo ~ j (T((=~ ~ \\ ,,o ! 'IH~MLA7 ED B£GPOCK cc:HQIJRS

        • * ***
  • f57I ").TD ac: o ~oC< cc.y:--*:u?.s

--- G?.Curn S lJ::l ~ ;.1.'.£ UJ.'flCUP5 MTb * / / ~\\ ~ \\\\~ '\\ ~j

l. R e c ~: CR(.P; Gl! f Qi{ IS USU1'Ll'1 WITH '. N St '1£?.;.L f[ [ l or l i:. ~ EU ST [.'!(, GK'1lHlfl SLCf "*C:'

~ \\ ~J COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2

HOOD ANO SOMlRV (LL COUNTI ES, TEXAS SCAL£ 4

,~ FEET H.J. GRUY AND ASSOCIATES, INC

A goo w N 00 10° 10° ~..------,----..- NUMBER OF SEGMENTS MEASURED -o 5 10 15 20 25 DIRECTIONS AND FREQUENCIES OF STRAIGHT STREAM SEGMENTS IN LOWER HALF OF PALUXY BASIN N oo l_O~ 0_-r---,--...,.__,I 0° 30 - 900 E 900 w NUMBER OF FRACTURES MEASURED -- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 E 900 STRIKES AND FREQUENCIES OF STRUCTURAL TRENDS IN LOWER HALF OF PALUXY BASIN

Reference:

Howell, 1967, Unpublished senior thesis, Bay,lor University. COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 RELATIONSHIP OF STREAM CHANNEL ALIGNMENTS TO STRUCTURAL TRENDS IN LOWER PALUXY BASIN FIGURE

2. 5.1-18

A A SOURCE: Boone, P., 1963 A' 0 Meridian - 25 A' AREA MAP AREA COVERED BY THIS FIGURE 50 Miles COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 PRE-CRETACEOUS PALEOTOPOGRAPHY FIGURE 2.5.1-19

~ No swelling, granitic Lubbock Q Low swelling, little or th in montmorillonite ~ Medium swelling, montmorillonite cloy High swell ing, montmorillonite clay Modified after Carter,' The Soils of Texas', Texas Agric. Expei. Sta. Bulletin No. 431, 1951. / -- / 0 K L A H 0 M A 0 100 200 MILES COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 DISTRIBUTION OF EXPANSIVE SOILS FIGURE 2.5.1-20

0 (/) w

x:

u ::; z: 0 s ~ (/) z: CJ ,01 .02 .03 .04 .OS .06 0 Q BORING P-lOA g Q ""'i--.. DEPTH FEET 265.2 PRESSURE IN LBS I SQ, FT, DRY DENSITY LBS/FT3 105,4 0 0 ~ 0 ~ ! '\\ \\ \\ ~ 0 MOISTURE CONTENT 13.4 COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 CONSOLIDATION TEST DATA FIGURE 2.5.1-21

800 ~ 750 L-700 L-650 L-600.__ ~ ~ 550 L- ~ 500 L-450 ~ 400.__ 350 ~ EX !STING GROUND SURFACE GUN ROSE LIMESTONE WET UNIT WEIGHT

  • 155 L8./fT. 3 Et.670' Ii EXISTING PIEZOMETRIC LEVEL IN THE TWIN MOUNTAINS FORMATION Et.610' TWIN MOUNTAINS FORMATION WET UNIT WEIGHT
  • 1~5 LBS./FT. 3 PIEZOMETRIC LEVEL AFTER ASSUMED DRAWDOWN POINT B @

EL. 375' SETTLEMENT CALCULATIONS USE THE FOLLOWING EQUATION: P' f S = H Cc Log!O -p-,- o Where S = Settlement In feet 160' LAYER l 150' LAYER 2 ASSUMPT!~S

l. WATER LEVEL IN GLEN ROSE LIMESTONE REMAINS CONSTANT AT Et. 770'.
2. PIEZOMETRIC LEVEL IN THE TlHN MOUNTAINS FORMATION DROPS FROM EL.670' TO EL.*SO'.

H = Layer of th I ckness f n feet Cc"' Slope of consolidation curve on strain vs log pressure plot P' f= Effective stress after drawdown in psf P' 0 = Effect1ve stress before drawdown i n psf Divide Twin Mountains into two layers and find effer.t1ve stresses in each layer at midpoi nt {A & B) At':_ P' 0 * (200' x 155 lb/ft3) t (80' x 135 1b/ft3) - (140 x 62.4 lb/ft3) = 33,064 psf P' f = (200' x 155 lb/ftJ) + (80 x 135 lb/ ft3 ) = 41,800 psi At! P' 0 = (200' x 155 lb/ft3) + (225' x 135 ib/ft3) - (295 x 62.4 lb/ft3) = 42,964psf P' f = (200' x 155 lb/ ftl) + (ISO' x 135 lb/ft3) + {75 (135 lb/ft3 - 62.4 lb/ft3) J *56,695psf Calculate settlement in each layer Layer 1 Layer 2 S = (!60')(.034) L09JO (41 *800i* 0.55 33P64 S * (150')(.034) Lo910 ( ~g~l):0.61 TOTAL SUBS l DENCE = l. 16' Al lGmMrnT 4 JANIJARY 31. 1979 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 SUBSIDENCE CALCULATION FIGURE 2.s.1-22

l \\ /" LEG ENO {/ PRODUCING GAS WELL e PRODUCING OIL WELL ORY AND ABANDONED WE LL 0 PERMITTED LOCATION NL NO LOG ONP DID NOT PENETRATE MAPPED HORIZON - 4189' TOP OF STRUCTURE (SUBSEA) - 7~ J. ~1

  • - \\--7 1 7.~,~~.. )

/ ( f\\... ,,.___/) / . \\ ( I.~~ \\ .. / \\\\ \\\\\\\\\\ \\ ' 'jc)JJ J)J\\ / / 1,,# / ..,. / I/;( ~~~ I -,, /It\\( { 1'.1 J>/ ~ / / ? § \\ y/, ' / / 8 ' \\. / / / \\,/ COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 Ellenburger-Structure Map FIGURE 2. 5

  • 1-2 3 SCALE IN FEET 32000 0

32000 l".i1"lli

I I I \\ . I <) PRODUCING GAS WELL DRY AND ABANDONED WELL Z. PLUGGED WfLl PERMITTED LOCATION Nl. NO LOG DNP DID NOT PENETRATE MAPPED HORIZON - 4552' TOP Of STRUCTURE (SUBSE Al Ellenburger-Structure Map JULY 27, 1978 CONTOUR INTERVAL: 100 FEET SOMERVELL AND SOUTHERN HOOD COUNTIES, TEXAS SCALE IN FEET 8000 0 8000 ~~-... -- **-* MAY', 1978 NOTE: See Figure 2.5.1-30 And Figure 2.5.1-31 For Cross Sections A-A' And B-8 1 , Respectivel y --- u~~~ou~~~-s~~~~-~~~~~~~~~~~~~D-~L_~_.r_~_~_ HJ. GRUY AND ASSOCIATES, INC _J

~6b. * ' '1 *~ C( .~ ~1-~J r '\\ \\~ J \\ ~ / f '~;~~<~:/-,*. \\. . (p-j:.... \\ ~.,.. .,~"'(,,."

  • r,,,,t _\\

,,J'; . ::::) ,~,1,~ I :***-

  • J9 I

\\'!- \\~ -\\ - ,, *- \\ ':' !.: :~::>:, *,,.".: r:>, i 1oo- '. ~: 1 "_ ~~---~ :;:~----r 0#\\ *. , ;i"' .*._, c..' '/""J \\-

r.

I \\ \\,,,*1 \\,1~ ONP DID NOT PENETRATE MAPPED HORIZON -3841' TOP OF STRUCTURE (SUBSEA) LINE OF CROSS SECTIONS \\ i;l AMENDMENT 2 JULY 27, 1978 .NOTE: See Figure 2.5.1-30 And Figure 2.5.1-31 For Cross Sections A-A' And B-8 1

  • Resoectivelv COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S.

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 Marble Falls-Structure Map FIGURE 2.5.1-24 CONTOUR INTERVAL: 100 FEET SOMERVE;LL AND SOUTHERN HOOD COUNTIES, TEXAS SCALE IN FEET 800~~~~~~~o~...,...~8~000~!.l.iii.lii~l6000 MAY, 1978 DALLAS, TEXAS H. J_ GRUY AND ASSOCIATES, INC. N i'

NOTE: THE GEOLOGICAL INFORMATION REPRINTED HEREIN IS THE PROPERTY OF THE GEOMAP COMPANY, AND HAS BEEN EXTRACTED FROM THEIR MAP NO. MBFL-T29A, Horizon A, (Notice 1/23/81). I~ ~ 8,000 16,000 2.4,000 S CALE: 8 1i1' 0 0 c: 0=--==----i1::::===:::l---- AMENDMENT 16 MARCH 31, 1981 COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 Marble Falls Structure Geo Map FIGURE 2.5.1-24 0

LEflENO v PRODUCING GAS WELL -¢- ORY AND ABANDONED WELL 0 PLUGGED WELL 0 PERMITTED LOCATION NL NO LOG ONP DID NOT PENETRATE MAPPED HORIZON E6' NET THICKNESS OF PlllY LINE OF CROSS SECTIONS AMENDMENT 2 JULY 27, 1978 NOTE: See Figure 2.5.1-30 and Figure 2.5.1-31 for Cross Sections A-A 1 and B-8 1 , respectively. COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 Marble Falls-Net Hydrocarbon Isopachous Map FIGURE 2.5.1-25 CONTOUR INTERVAL* 10 FEET SOMERVELL AND SOUTHERN HOOD COUNTIES, TEXAS SCALE IN FEET 8000 0 8000 16000 MAY, 1978 DALLAS, TEXAS H.J. GRUY AND ASSOCIATES, INC. r I

~~

  • \\ \\

\\/. '\\\\~) LE (j EN 0 AS WELL p PRODUCING G NOONED WELL V ORY ANO ABALL 0 PLUGG~~E:~OCATION PERMI ON NL NO LOG ETRATE MAPPED HORIZ ONP DID NOT PEN CTURE (SUBSEA) -~642' TOP OF STRU AMENUMEf H 2 8 JUL y 27' 197 1-30 and F' ure 2. 5. t'ons ~orE: See igf r Cross Sec,

r. 1 31 °
  • ely F; g u re 2 * :J *

- _ 8, res pee t 1 v A-A' and B ' j / -~ .*...*. :.;.\\

  • ,_ -~

~ * ~ '* ~ '- -~q, PEAK S.E.S. COMANCH~NALYSIS REPORT FINAL SAFETY d 2 UNITS 1 an

I I PRODUCING GAS WELL DRY AND ABANDONED WELL 0 PLUGGED WELL 0 PERMITTED LOCATION NL NO LOG ONP DID NOT PENETRATE MAPPED HORIZON 15' NET THICKNESS OF PAY LINE OF CROSS SECTIONS AMENDMENT 2 JULY 27, 1978 NOTE: See Figure 2.5.1-30 And Figure 2.5.1-31 For Cross Sections A-A' and B-B', Respectively COMANCHE PEAKS.ES. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 Big Saline-Net Hydrocarbon Isopachous Map FIGURE 2.5.1-27 CONTOUR INTERVAL= 10 FEET SOMERVE;LL AND SOUTHERN HOOD COUNTIES, TEXAS SCALE IN FEET 6000 0 6000 16000 MAY, 1978 DALLAS, TEXAS J'l["_JIU'il"§_ 2 H.J. GRUY AND ASSOCIATES, INC. ~ I

PRODUCING GAS WELL DRY ANO ABANDONED WELL PLUGGED WFLL PERMITTED LOCATION NL NO i...OG DNP OiO NOT PENETRATE MAPPED HORIZON -1980' !OP OF STRUCTURE (SUBSEA) LINE OF CROSS SECTIONS AMrnDMEIH 2 JULY 27, 1978 \\ '\\., " \\ rWTE: See Figure 2.5.1-30 And Figure 2.S.1-31 For Cross Sections A-A' and B-t3', Resµect i ve ly \\ '\\ -~ \\_ \\Ai -~~--.--------**-*-* - ---** -----*- COMANCHE PE.Ll.K S. E.S FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS *1 and 2 Strawn-Structure Map FIGURE CONTOUR INTERVAL' 100 FEET SOMERVELL AND SOUTHERN HOOD COUNTIES. TEXAS SCALE IN FEET BOOO 0 8000 i 6000 MAY, 1978 DALLAS, TEXAS w.-...i-..----........._-..waa H.J. GRUY AND ASSOCIATES, INC i

.!:..[Ji END 1:) PRODUCING GAS WELL ')-

>RY AND ABANDONED WELL 0

PLUGGED WELL 0 PERMITTED LOCATION NL NO LOG DNP DID NOT PENETRATE MAPPED HORIZON 43' NET THICKNESS OF PAY LINE OF CROSS SECTIONS AMENDMENT 2 JULY 27, 1978 1~0TE: See Figure 2.5.1-30 And Figure 2.5.1-31 For Cross Sections A-A' and B-~ 1 , Respectively COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 Strawn-Net Hydrocarbon Isopachous Map FIGURE 2.5.1-29 CONTOUR INTERVAL* 10 FEET SOMERVELL AND SOUTHERN HOOD C8UNTIES, TEXAS SCALE IN FEET 8000 0

    • -* 8000 16000 MAY, 1978 DALLAS, TEXAS H.J. GRUY AND ASSOCl~TES, INC.

r I

soo' i. DATUM 2000 SUBSEA 4)00' NORT HW~sr A

J GU..FO'lCORP '-; C ' C "M: l " t o s ~ /\\MEiWMENT 2 JULY 27, 1978 M I D -CON~ I NENT P~ TR OL.E: 'J M C"OAP No

  • Souo 11r1 (:**eei.. Cott1e BASt LOWER CRETACEOUS

--~ . ~ . --r---, NOTE: See Figure 2.5.l-23A for location of cross section. COMANCHE PE AK S. E. S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 Northwest To Southeast Structural Cross Section A-A' FICiURE

2. 5.1-30 COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION

( PROJECTED INTO LINE OF SECTION ) TOP EL L £~8UAGER 6 3 Miles HOOO ANO SOMERVELL COUNT!ES, TEXAS VE RTICAL SCAL[ ,NFEET SOUTHEAST A' \\ ) I i' t ~

    • z::
  • ~

r I L ~ { I ~ I ! i I* l r j l~ 1 ~ - i l I I ~ I \\_ ? > I LOCAL GEOLOGiC CO~U MN z z ...J I/) z z w a.. z < u > ~ 0

LEVEL soc' 1000' 1500' DATUM 2oco' SUBSEl . 3000' ' 3500' .. 4000' f_.4500' lsooo'

5500'

~ lr 6000' SOUTHWEST B i I AMENDMENT 2 jLJL Y 27, 1978 I I NOTE: See Figure 2.5.l-23A for location of cross section. COMANCHE PEAK S. ES FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 Southwest to Northeast Structural Cross Section B-B' FIGURE 2.5.1-31 NORTHEAST B' ' [ I '1 "- i (

  • *~

HOOD AND SOMERVELL COUNTIES, TEXAS VERTICALSCll.LEiN FEEi O 1QC 20C~ C ~ ?C HORI ZONTAL SCALE l>.SNOTED H J *~RU f ANO ASSOCIATES ' INC z ~ ~ : <{ _J (/) z z w Q.

v ~ ~- )( 96o" .?:fo~ I\\ / \\. K,.. ~ ""~' 1 \\. r~ \\ \\, __ ' ~' -7..::- IO >>--==~~ 1 l_ ___ /- KC: Y. -- PA LUXY SANO /GL EN ROSE CONTOUR GLEN ROSE MAR KER BED DATUM: BASE PALUXY SAND/TOP GLEN ROSE LIMESTONE CONTOUR INTERVAL 25 FT. X=OUTCROP POINTS 0 I 2 Ml. --~~~--~~

=====' Amendment 67 February 5, 1988 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 STRUCTURE MAP OVERLAY UPPER GLEN ROSE MARKER BED ZONE I/ZONE II FIGURE 2.5.1~32

-<): JACK GRYNBERG & ASSOCIATES HOOPER N0.2 D "- A GULF 01 L CORP ~ '<(-. c.L.CAMPBELL No. 1 GULF OIL CORP. -\\:}......_ D.McINTOSH NO 1 ~ Ml D-CONTI NENT PETROLEUM CORP. B-- ~ SQUAW CREEK CATTLE CO. NO. l ./-\\__ "- ~ W. I. D. #2 /-V B.M. FITZGERALD GULF ENERGY AND MINERALS CO.U.S. OTIS ROLLINS NO.l A c I\\ / VAN MORRISON NO.l I // W.I.D. #3 I ef I / DALLAS PRODUCTION CO. BEN J. TAYLOR I // HUBBARD NO.l WIGGINS NO.l I / W.I.D. #14 W.I.D. #12 / I 0.... I GULF OIL CORP. (R.D.ALLEN) 1 BRATTEN RANCH N0.1-A _____ --0,.. ~ THE BARON CO.\\ CPS~S GULF ENERGY A~D MINERALS CO.U.S. ~

NELON7, 0.1-B

/ BRATTEN RANCH. 7 1 1 W. I.D. # 21 \\ / \\ SINGER-LAYNE TEXAS I / \\\\TEXAS UTILITIES WW N0.1 I \\ I \\ C' ~ DE SOTO 0 IL CO. I

'0 c,O. c,O.

\\ B. W. WANN NO. 1 <;/ \\\\~~'-1~-yv \\ OIL PROSPECTORS (C.H.KADANE ET AL) /'00~ \\\\\\ \\/_,,/ \\ \\ 5 MILE RADIUS \\\\\\ \\ L \\ \\ \\ PLYMOUTH (M.E.DAVIS) ~ T.H. COUSINS NO.l "r-' A' M.M.BUNT ET AL NO.l INDEX TO STRUCTURAL CROSS-SECTIONS PALEOZOIC A - A' FIGURE 2.5.1-30 B - B' FIGURE 2.5.1-31 CRETACEOUS C - C' FIGURE 2.5.1-34 D - D' FIGURE 2.5.1-33 ~ --f-VICINITY GEOLOGIC MAP r J FIGURE 2.5.1-10 AND t I OUTCROP STRUCTURAL MAP +- - FIGURE 2. 5.1-32 AND RELATED CRETACEOUS MAPS 0 1 2 3 4 SCALE IN MILES AMENDMENT 4 JANUARY 31, 1979 COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S. NUCLEAR PLANT UNITS 1 and 2 STRUCTURAL CROSS-SECTION LOCATIONS FIGURE 2.5.1-33

10 5 0 MILES 5 MILES t-w WEST 1000 900 800 ~ 700 _J w w _J w U1 w 0 co z 0 t-w _J w 600 500 400 300 200 GULF ENERGY & MINERALS CO. U.S. SITE OTIS ROLLINS NO. 1 c ~ 0 GAMMA RAY Gt.. P4 W.I.D.#12 BEN J. TAYLOR WIGGINS NO. 1 0 g~ Ctv;/-U)(y 0st~4N l..1 'lJ 0 ONt SINGER-LAYNE TEXAS TEXAS UTILITIES WATER WELL NO. 1 0 ~ "1£~ ~~ ~~ RESISTIVITY ',<olV£ I <o~' V£ !~, ~ 0 .L' C' OIL PROSPECTORS (C.H.KADANE ET AL) M.M. BUNT ET AL NO.I -¢- ~ 0 glf ~~SELF POTENTIAL lg N r 9r <. k: Otvt 9,.. <. 1,, Otv,t a 11,b g~ RESISTIVITY 0 0 '° GAMMA-RAY AND RESISTIVITY LOGS CORRELATED WITH LOGS OF CORE BORING P-10 AT SITE. (FIG. 2.5.5-17) 0 0 '° EAST 100( 900 800 t-700 ~ _J w w _J 600 ~ w 0 CD ct: z: 0 ~ 500 ~ 400 300 200 w _J w LINE-OF-SECTION: INDEX MAP FIG. 2.5.1-33 AMENDMENT 4 JANUARY 31, 1979 COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S. NUCLEAR PLANT UNITS 1 and 2 CRETACEOUS STRUCTURE WEST TO EAST CROSS-SECTION C-C' FIGURE 2.5.1-34

MILES NORTHWEST 800 700 I- ~ 600 _J w w _J c:( ~ 500 w 0 co c:(

z:

0 ~ ~ 400 w _J w 300 200 15 10 0 SITE SOUTHEAST JACK GRYNBERG & ASSOCIATES HOOPER NO. 2 D D' GULF OIL CORP. GAMMA RAY C.L. CAMPBELL NO. 1 0 0 o*- 0 0 l.J\\ GAMMA RAY ~Cfo110 Pc,l't!ts Jz //~ //41}' f Jl;t 0 0 0 0 0 (V'\\ 0 0 l.J\\ GAMMA-RAY AND RESISTIVITY LOGS CORRELATED WITH LOGS OF CORE BORING P-10 AT SITE. (FIG. 2.5.5-17) W.I.D.#2 MIO-CONTINENT PETROLEUM CORP. SQUAW CREEK CATTLE CO. NO.l -<)- SINGER-LAYNE TEXAS TEXAS UTILITIES WATER WELL NO. 1 SELF POTENTIAL *o 0 kg k~£ ZoN£ 0 0 '° SELF POTENTIAL RESISTIVITY 0 RESISTIVITY 0 ~ _s:- ~~> ~ ~ ~~2:= g~L c__ c >~ 800 700 1-600 ~ _J w w _J c:( 500 ~ w 0 cc c:(

z:

0 ~ 400 ~ 300 200 w _J w LINE-OF-SECTION: INDEX MAP FIG. 2.5.1-33 AMENDMENT 4 JANUARY 31, 1979 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. NUCLEAR PLANT UNITS 1 and 2 CRETACEOUS STRUCTURE NORTHWEST TO SOUTHEAST CROSS-SECTION D-0' FIGURE 2.5.1-35

l' Cl I c G">

lJ rT'1 m
o V>

3: rT'1 (/) (/) N (/) 3: . l'Tl...... <.Tl :z ('""') N )> ;:o I

z......

1--' CJ (/) -0 rT'1 3:

o )>

'"CJ

z

(/) "'Tl z )> (") ro (/)~ c )> )> z ri:i z -I (") -I -< I cn )> m ~z OJ )> -u

i

!:::( m a.. (/) )> N (/)A

0 (/)

m* -u !TI 0 (/)

0.

-I 3 ZONE 0 - NO DAMAGE ZONE 1 - MINOR DAMAGE ZONE 2 - MODERATE DAMAGE ZONE 3 - MAJOR DAMAGE SOURCE: Algermissen and Perkins, 1973 (64)

100° 95° 35°---+- 0 100 SCALE IN MILES LEGEND ............. ISOSEISMALS e LOCATION OF INTENSITY REPORTS o EARTHQUAKE EPICENTER I-XI I INTENSITY (MODIFIED MERCALLI) Doceka 1 ( 69) 200 90°_"~--- ' \\ I ' ../ - ----"\\ \\ I COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 1882 BONHAM (PARIS) TEXAS EARTHQUAKE ISOSEISMAL MAP FIGURE

2. 5. 2-3

JOO 0 92° Marksville

  • 0 0

0 0 20 40 SCALE {' '"'"" d LIMIT OF FELT AREA (f L,. 0 MI SS!SS I P:I ~ ~o a-..._ 3 ~-*

  • -*-*----~*-:-1

~o * ~ St. Francisville I _ IV ... 3 LEGEND: 4 2 IV - V

  • 3-4 Thibodaux 0

GULF OF MEXICO 4 4 Denotes Rossi-Forel int ensity at reporting location 0 0 I-IV Denotes range in Rossi-Forel intensities intensities reported in contoured area 60 Miles g90 COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 1930 DONALDSONVILLEt LA.

REFERENCE:

Neumann (24) EARTHQUAKE ISOSEISMAL MAP FIGURE

2. 5. 2-4

10s* 106. 104. 102. 100°

98.

95* (./) 36l I I l I I I ~~*

  • 1*~6 \\

oWol~ \\ I I ~36' C) z sp:;;~ c ~ I I ~.. nTalo4o..

o

{'") t:tJ I rr oJv.g... 1 lfanV"in0 I I ~ 1 0cO I K . J oft.Wt**~ H z ~ r"~*~ ~-- o.gu

  • Albuj[Uerque I o 11J.cum.o CD t:tJ c:

z 3 (/) St.JoJuu Ena.ncia l'.l> H

I

~ w MI E x I I I" In 1011...u...

I H

34* OTo t:tJ ('/) oSocorro l'.l> ~ I I oGlobe I I I I r-n.A.-ru.g x I I l I oLubbock

I 0..

~ I oela.irem t co 0 (/) Cll 1 _J. 0.. Fort' H CD I f Tucson. .A.bik=. I o I

o 0

32* Baird I ~ Vl 0 . -*:-r W*s* \\ ~~.,

o t
-1

-I )> 0 Oden. -I c: T N -I V1 ( 5on AJ>.g*~'f ___J -...J JT1 0 l """ - ~,,_-

x I I r-IV II, Ill JT1 0

Vl 0 Auet1~ -~cl>:_.~ ---t-- AUG. 16 VIII ______ J o San A n.:tonu. I z 0 )> () ~I~

  • 1 ____ /
  • /"~"""

cs ~ ro c

x::

(J) ~ ~..0..... c ~ )> c '° zmZ 28' ~w I I I \\.\\. I J __ :Y;l1/'--i2'd' -1 () <<l-- J-N rn < I

e::

(J) )> m I JMf I El .xr o.fonine> oc IC I 01........,, 0 (./) (./) ....... z -0 N 0 -i I (./) CJ )> m 01 rn -i ~ )> ..... rT1 (./) >< o... (J) 7' $~ N (J) r

u (/)

3: mm I 16' 1-t----..-J_ __ I I I I I I I

  • I

~::.2J.-l~26' ~ -0. 0 (f)

u.

I 110. 108° 106° 104. -l 102' 100'

ELL IS / /" \\,'/ HILL 1 \\ NAVARRO 32°N ----;-~--;--:t~~~~:-::--:_::---:------~~~-----_);. ---- LIMIT 0 F FE L.T ARE A J<. /llards (33), ~ /'. ,f\\ ) \\/ 90/' ANDERSON / / 1.1 f-*-- - \\ \\ \\, l// TEHUACANA \\. -~ '( ( k~'\\* NOAA EPICENTER(l19 1 ) 6 '\\ 1~x1A 1 ~ I \\ PRAgIE HILL L \\ 0 I F R E E s T 0 N E.. \\ TUGfil \\ LIMESTONE \\ / /- M ./ J.. 1 e /"" C LENN AN GROESBECKO DOCE KAL EPICENTER (69) -" /, ' '../ ,,. / ,,,./ \\ \\ ,,,./ \\ -;;?ORNTON / \\ ~ I ),-// \\ FALLS LEON // ~' ,/-< ROBERTSON \\ _,,-' ~---- 310N ~~~~----~,_-.-k--------i..._' ~-"'---+-------" / \\\\ /*~ I I I \\ MILAM / I MADISON I I I ~ ~ .,,,. OIL OR GAS FIELD FAULT, HACHURES ON DOWNTHROWN SIDE LOCATION MAP COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 ~----------* 1932 WORTHAM-MEXIA EARTHQUAKE FIGURE

2. 5. 2-6

v AFTER BRAZEE (1972) Ref. 2.5-88 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 4.5 AREA OF MMIV OR CREATER (1000 SQ MI) A. Felt Area - Modified Mercalli Intensity Relationship for Eastern and Central U. S. Earthquakes 35 30 z 0 25 t-< u

> §c;;" 20

"',.J P..11'1 g! 15

cl

~ ~ 10 I I 5 I I I 0 ii 1920 I I I I I AFTER FLAWN (1970) Ref. 2. 5-89 MEXIA FIELD I I OIL PRODUCTION HISTORY I ' I I I I I I I I I I I I 1922 \\ \\ \\ \\ \\. ' ' \\... ~........ '-IC-_... - 1924 1926 1928 1930 1932 TIME YEARS B. Mexia Field Oil Production History COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 MEXIA EARTHQUAKE OBSERVATIONS FIGURE 2.5.2-7

102* 98° 96° oGoodl d

  • Le
  • K oCJUroemo t L

30" Rr~* 100° 98° 96" SOURCE: Murphy,L.M. and Cloud,W.K. (27) 94° oM.l!rico 38* / i

  • A.... I

.r~MO . -1* - Ak~l * .-;~ I cYellrill< .....-+-4_;___-"-'--~~i-36" cBun 32° Statute Miles 6 8 so 8 Tho 30* 94* 92* COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 1952 EL RENO, OKLAHOMA EARTHQUAKE INTENSITY MAP FIGURE

2. 5, 2-8

100* 99* 98" KANSAS 37* ---- -------- -*------ --------- 36" OKLAHOMA 35' TEXAS 34* 3J" 100* 99* 17 June 1959, 04:27:07 CST 60 80 100 Scale of Miles "8. SOURCE: Eppley,R.A. and Cloud,W.K. (93) 97* 3 0

96.
36.

Limits of Felt Area 35* 34* 33* 32* 97* 96" COMANCHE PEAK S. E.S. FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UNITS 1 and 2 1959 SOUTHERN OKLAHOMA EARTHQUAKE ISOSEISMAL MAP FIGURE 2.5.2-9}}

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML16180A436&oldid=5168141"