ML16161A946

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Insp Repts 50-269/87-51,50-270/87-51 & 50-287/87-51 on 871222-880115.Violation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Maint, Operations,Surveillance,Physical Security,Esf Lineups,Safety Sys Functional Insp Items,Pdr & 10CFR21 Reviews
ML16161A946
Person / Time
Site: Oconee  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 01/28/1988
From: Bryant J, Peebles T, Skinner P, Wert L
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML16161A945 List:
References
50-269-87-51, 50-270-87-51, 50-287-87-51, NUDOCS 8802030341
Download: ML16161A946 (16)


See also: IR 05000269/1987051

Text

3 REGO

UNITED STATES

co

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION II

101 MARIETTA STREET, N.W.

ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30323

Report Nos.:

50-269/87-51, 50-270/87-51, and 50-287/87-51

Licensee:

Duke Power Company

422 South Church Street

Charlotte, NC

28242

Docket Nos.: 50-269, 50-270,

License Nos.: DPR-38, DPR-47, and

and 50-287

DPR-55

Facility Name:

Oconee 1, 2, and 3

Inspection Conducted:

December 22, 1987 - January 15, 1988

J. C Bry~n

Senio'Resident Inspector

P.-i

Skinn

Sen~id Resident Inspector

'aVSge

)

L. 0. wert, Residen

Inspector

a-e S g d

Approved by:

_

_

_',

____

T.A. Peebles, Section Chief

Date Signed

Division of Reactor Projects

SUMMARY

Scope:

This routine,

unannounced inspection involved resident inspection

on-site in the areas of operations,

surveillance,

maintenance,

physical

security, review of Safety System Functional Inspection items,

engineered

safeguards features lineups,

B&W Owners Group Plant Reassessment Program,

review of the public document room, and 10 CFR Part 21 reviews.

Results: Of the nine areas inspected, one violation was identified (Failure to

follow procedure for maintaining freeze seal, paragraph 6.b).

8802030341 880129

PDR

ADOCK 05000269

a

PDR

REPORT DETAILS

1. Persons Contacted

Licensee Employees

M. Tuckman, Station Manager

J. Davis, Technical Services Superintendent

  • W. Foster, Maintenance Superintendent

T. Glenn, Instrument and Electrical Support Engineer

C. Harlin, Compliance Engineer

  • R. Lynn, Materials Manager, CMD
  • J. McIntosh, Administrative Services Superintendent
  • F. Owens, Assistant Engineer, Compliance
  • R. Sweigart, Operations Superintendent
  • C. Thompkins, Maintenance Manager, CMD
  • L. Wilkie, Integrated Scheduling Superintendent

Other licensee employees contacted included technicians,

operators,

mechanics, security force members, and staff engineers.

NRC Resident Inspectors:

J. C. Bryant

  • P. H. Skinner

L. D. Wert

  • Attended exit interview.

2.

Exit Interview

The inspection scope and findings were summarized on January 15,

1988,

with those persons indicated in paragraph 1 above.

The inspectors described the areas inspected and discussed in detail the

inspection findings listed below.

Dissenting comments were not received

from the licensee.

Proprietary information is not contained in this

report.

Item Number

Status

Description/Reference Paragraph

269/87-51-01

Open

(Violation)

Failure

to

follow

procedures associated with freeze seal

on LP piping to BWST

270, 287/87-51-02

Open

(Inspector Followup Item Completion of

NSM

22662

and 32662 for cavitating

venturis on emergency feedwater pumps

2

Item Number

Status

Description/Reference Paragraph

269, 270, 287/87-51-03

Closed

(Licensee Identified Violation) Failure

to provide timely reports to NRC as

required by TS 4.17.6.a and 4.17.6.b

269, 270, 287/86-16-15

Closed

  • (Unresolved)

Associated

with

SSFI

inspection.

Design analysis on

EFW

steam supply relief valves

269, 270, 287/86-16-17

Closed

(Unresolved)

Associated

with

SSFI

inspection. Failure to conduct design

analysis

269, 270, 287/86-16-18

Closed

(Unresolved)

Associated

with

SSFI

inspection. Failure to conduct design

analysis (5 examples)

P 2186-03

Closed

10 CFR Part 21 on diaphragm valves by

Dresser Industries

3.

Licensee Action on Previous Enforcement Matters

This area was not inspected.

4.

Plant Operations (71707)

a. The inspectors reviewed plant operations throughout the reporting

period to verify conformance with regulatory requirements, technical

specifications (TS), and administrative controls. Control room logs,

shift turnover records, and equipment removal and restoration records

were

reviewed routinely.

Discussions were conducted with plant

operations,

maintenance,

chemistry,

health physics,

Instrument &

Electrical (I&E), and performance personnel.

Activities within the control rooms were monitored on an almost daily

basis. Inspections were conducted on day and on night shifts, during

week days and on weekends.

Some inspections were made during shift

change in order to evaluate shift turnover performance.

Actions

observed were conducted as required by the licensees administrative

procedures.

The complement of licensed personnel

on

each shift

inspected met or exceeded the requirements of TS.

Operators were

responsive to plant annunciator alarms and were cognizant of plant

conditions.

  • Unresolved

items are matters about which more information is required to

determine whether they are acceptable or may involve violations or deviations.

3

Plant tours were taken throughout the reporting period on a routine

basis. The areas toured included the following:

Turbine Building

Auxiliary Building

Units 1, 2, and 3 Electrical Equipment Rooms

Units 1, 2, and 3 Cable Spreading Rooms

Station Yard Zone within the Protected Area

Standby Shutdown Facility

Units 1, 2, and 3 Penetration Rooms

During the plant tours, ongoing activities, housekeeping, security,

equipment status, and radiation control practices were observed.

Unit 1 operated at 100% power during this period.

Unit 2 began operation at 87% and reduced power to 80% due to an A2

feedwater heater leak on December 24.

The leak was isolated and

power gradually returned to 85% on December 31.

Unit 3 began operation at 100% and reduced power on January 4, 1988,

to 80% due to a SG tube leak.

The leak stabilized at approximately

.016 gpm and power was increased to 100% on January 11.

b.

During a review of outstanding items by licensing engineering

personnel at the general office, a condition was identified regarding

reports

required

by Technical

Specification (TS) 4.17.6.a and

4.17.6.b. This TS requires that the number of tubes plugged or

repaired in each steam generator (SG)

be

reported to the

NRC,

Region II,

within 30 days following completion of the plugging or

repair procedure and a report within 3 months providing the results

of SG tube inservice inspection. The licensee identified that 10 of

the last 17 reports were submitted late and that the current report

per TS 4.17.6.a is overdue for the most recent Unit 1 outage.

This

finding is documented in the licensee's Problem Investigation Report

(PIR) Serial No. 4-088-0009. Although this problem is a violation of

TS,

it will not be cited since it meets the conditions as stated in

10 CFR 2, Appendix C, in that:

(1) The problem was identified by the licensee

(2) The problem fits into a Severity Level V

(3) It was reported as required

(4) The problem is being corrected and measures being taken to

prevent recurrence

(5) It was not a violation that could reasonably be expected to have

been

prevented by

corrective action taken

on a previous

violation.

4

For documentation purposes this item is identified as Licensee

Identified Violation (LIV) 269,

270,

287/87-51-03:

Failure to

provide timely reports to NRC as required by TS 4.17.6.a and b.

5. Surveillance Testing (61726)

Surveillance tests were reviewed by the inspectors to verify procedural

and performance adequacy. The completed tests reviewed were examined for

necessary test prerequisites, instructions, acceptance criteria, technical

content, authorization to begin

work,

data collection, independent

verification where required, handling of deficiencies noted, and review of

completed work. The tests witnessed, in whole or in part, were inspected

to determine that approved procedures were available, test equipment was

calibrated, prerequisites were met,

tests were conducted according to

procedure, test results were acceptable and

systems restoration was

completed.

Surveillances witnessed in whole or in part:

PT/O/A/600/21

Post Maintenance Operation of SSF Diesel Generator

PT/0/A/600/23

Inventory Checks of SSF D/G Fuel Tank

PT/O/A/160/04 Containment Hydrogen Control System Piping Flow Test

PT/1/A/115/04 Emergency Feedwater System Valve Verification

IP/1/A/503/3B Reactor Protection System Channel B Online Testing

(Unit 1)

No violations or deviations were identified.

6.

Maintenance Activities (62703)

a. Maintenance activities were observed and/or reviewed during the

reporting period to verify that work was performed by qualified

personnel and that approved procedures in use adequately described

work that was not within the skill of the trade.

Activities,

procedures

and work requests

were

examined

to verify proper

authorization to begin work, provisions for fire, cleanliness, and

exposure control,

proper return of equipment to service, and that

limiting conditions for operation were met.

Maintenance witnessed in whole or in part:

WR 10690C

Low Pressure Nitrogen Heater Repair

WR 92035C PR-9 Repairs

b.

On October 7,

1987,

a spill of approximately 30,000 gallons of

slightly radioactively contaminated water occurred when a freeze plug

failed while making a repair on a three inch pipe in the fluid path

to the Borated Water Storage Tank (BWST).

A portion of this spill

was not adequately contained and resulted in an uncontrolled release

to the chemical treatment

pond and subsequently off-site.

The

5

licensee has investigated this event

and the details of this

investigation are given in the licensee's investigation report number

OS-87-08-1.

The inspector has also reviewed in detail

the

circumstances attributing to this event and considers that a failure

to follow procedures compounded by a failure to provide an adequate

procedure to be the root cause of this event. The procedure used for

this evaluation was TM/1/A/1800/06, Freeze Plugging -

Stainless Steel

Pipe -

Using Liquid Nitrogen -

Repair of Line Between 1LP-41 and

1LP-42 dated September 30, 1987. Areas where the procedure were not

followed are step 11.5.1 which required the nitrogen to be poured

slowly into a funnel to establish the ice plug and step 11.5.2 which

required adding nitrogen occasionally to keep the jacket flooded.

The method used was a continuous flow of nitrogen into the freeze

jacket which was not described in the procedure as an acceptable way

of establishing and maintaining the ice plug. In addition, step 11.6

which described the method to be used to thaw the ice plug was not

used which deviated from a special safety consideration given in the

procedure in step 4.3.5.B which stated that thawing should be done as

rapidly as possible. Inadequacies in the procedure were generalities

such as step 6.7 which stated "Verify adequate source of liquid

nitrogen is available at job site" instead of identifying the

quantity of liquid nitrogen to be maintained, and step 4.3.8 which

stated "Normal operating pressure AND temperature of system should be

reduced as much as possible" instead of specifying the limits to be

met for this requirement.

Another inadequacy was the chart provided

in Enclosure 13.2 which was for temperatures (water, pipe and work

area) below 70 degrees F and stated that a "longer time" will be

required when any of the temperatures are above 70 degrees F but

provided no additional

guidance.

Although this spill was

not

significant due to the low levels of contamination associated with

the BWST contents, the lack of management controls that allowed this

to occur is significant.

This item is identified as a violation

(269/87-51-01); Failure to Follow Procedures Associated With Freeze

Sealing Safety-Related Piping.

No additional violations or deviations were identified.

7. Resident Inspector Safeguards Inspection (71881)

In the course of the monthly activities, the Resident Inspectors included

review of portions of the licensee's physical security activities.

The

performance of various shifts of the security force was observed in the

conduct of daily activities which included; protected and vital areas

access controls, searching of personnel,

packages and vehicles,

badge

issuance and retrieval, escorting of visitors, patrols and compensatory

posts. In addition, the inspectors observed protected area lighting and

protected and vital areas barrier integrity, and verified interfaces

between the security organization and operations or maintenance.

No violations or deviations were identified.

6

8.

Inspection of Open Items (92701)

The following open item is being closed based on review of licensee

reports, inspection, record review, and discussions with

licensee

personnel, as appropriate:

(Closed) P2186-03: 3050 Diaphragm Valves by Dresser Industrial Valve

and Instrument Division. The licensee indicated that two of the type

valves identified in this Part 21 concern were shipped to the Oconee

Nuclear Station in 1976. There is no record of these valves being

installed in any safety related system.

The actual disposition of

these two valves was not identified, however,

the licensee stated

that the valves were not used in safety-related applications and are

no longer on-site. There is speculation that the valves may have

been moved to a non-nuclear facility.

Based on this information,

this item is closed.

9. Safety System Functional Inspection Report (92701)

Items left open

on the referenced inspection report (50-269,

270,

287/86-16) were reviewed to determine current status, as follows:

a.

(Closed)

Unresolved Item (50-269,

270,

287/86-16-17);

Examples of

Failures to Perform Design Analysis Discussed in Paragraph 3.4.7.

Example

1 identified a potential for runout of the Emergency

Feedwater Pumps (EFW) if flow control valves FDW 315 or 316 remained

open. The licensee addressed this issue and corrective action for

this condition in LER 269/86-10 and in a supplemental letter for this

LER dated May 28, 1987. The proposed corrective action for this item

is to install a cavitating venturi in each EFW line downstream of the

control valves. This action is scheduled to be completed during the

end-of-cycle refueling outages 11,

10 and 10 for Units 1, 2 and 3

respectively. Since this item is being tracked by the closure of

action associated with LER 86-10,

example 1 corrective actions are

considered complete for tracking purposes.

Example 2 was associated with modification NSM ON-1012 in which a

total discharge head (TDH)

was not performed to confirm that the

Standby Shutdown Facility (SSF)

auxiliary service water (ASW)

pump

could deliver required flow.

A TDH calculation was completed and

approv~d by DPC on December 8, 1986 (Calculation

number OSC-2072)

which confirmed that the SSF ASW pump would deliver required flow to

steam generators as required.

Example 3 identified that orifice sizing calculations were either not

done or not documented during a modification associated with the

high-pressure injection system.

A QA condition 1 calculation

(OSC-2341

dated December 22,1986) has been completed and shows that

the existing orifice plates were properly sized.

.7

In example 4 associated with NSM-1275,

was a case where the design

analysis to confirm that the motor driven EFW pumps from other units

could supply both SG's at full secondary pressure was performed by a

design engineer but was not controlled by a process suitable for

review and verification without recourse to the individual who

performed the analysis. This analysis was subsequently verified and

documented by calculation OSC-2516 dated July 28, 1987.

Example 5 was associated with modification NSM ON-2245 in which an

existing steam relief valve was to be replaced with a new valve of

the same size. Engineering personnel concluded that the same design

parameters

as the existing valve would

be used.

As a result,

engineering did not

identify that the

installed relief

had

insufficient capacity to prevent overpressurization of the piping

upstream of the relief valve.

In response dated October 1, 1986,

item 2.1.2 (1), DPC stated no potential impact on system function or

personnel safety due to the overpressurization condition. Subsequent

changes have been made to install steam traps on these steam lines

and also raise the design pressure rating of the piping upstream of

MS-92. These modifications are complete on Unit 1 and scheduled for

the next refueling outages on Units 2 and 3.

The examples cited above have each been addressed by the licensee.

The licensee's design control activities have been updated, reviewed

and re-indexed as described in DPC correspondence dated October 1,

1986, item 2.3.2 (1).

This system is located in the corporate design

offices in Charlotte. Based on the review of the corrective actions

of the specific examples cited above, this item is closed.

b. (Closed)

Unresolved Item (50-269,

270,

287/86-16-18);

Apparent

Failure to Conduct Adequate Design Analyses in Accordance With ANSI

N45.2.11.

Several

examples

were

found where

analyses

for

safety-related equipment were not performed in a controlled manner.

Correction of the examples given is discussed below:

Example 1 discussed orifice sizing associated with flow transmitters

FT-153 and FT-154. Analyses performed were not checked or verified,

the analyses did not have file identifiers and were not identified as

QA Condition 1. These calculations have been performed as documented

in DPC

calculation OSC-2340 dated December 22,

1986.

This

calculation shows that the orifice plates were properly sized.

Example 2 was associated with EFW pump flowrate calculation errors.

The licensee performed additional analyses at the time the inspection

was made as discussed in the details of the inspection report section

3.4.8 (2).

8

Example 3 was associated with the analysis of the motor starting

capability of the standby power supply fed through the underground

feeder from Keowee hydroelectric plant.

This dynamic analysis was

redone in a QA Condition 1 calculation format.

This calculation

shows that the voltage conditions at the

motor terminals is

sufficient to start and run the safety-related motors.

The licensee has corrected the specific examples identified in this

item. In addition, in DPC correspondence dated October 1, 1986,

in

item 2.3.2 (4),

the licensee recognized a weakness in the auditing

process by third party reviews and as a result formed a task force to

review their programs. The task force recommended revisions to the

documentation of the design process and integrated review of the

total design.

Implementation of these program

changes has been

completed as of March 1, 1987.

Based on this review, this item is

closed.

c.

(Closed)

Unresolved

Item (50-269,

270,

287/86-16-15);

Apparent

Failure to Conduct Adequate Design Analyses for EFW

Steam Supply

Relief Valve. This item is concerned with an overpressurization of

the steam supply line to the EFW pump turbine if

the steam supply

valve should fail open and the inadequate capacity of the steam

relief (MS-92). The steam line piping design pressure was 385 psig.

As addressed in the licensee's response dated October 1, 1986, item

2.1.2 (1),

DPC stated that there was no potential impact on system

function or personnel safety due to pressure exceeding the original

design rating. In addition, Duke has increased the pressure rating

of the piping and also issued modifications 12662,

22662 and 32662

which will install steam traps rated for higher pressures on the

steam lines. This modification has been completed on Unit 1 and is

scheduled for the next refueling outage on Units 2 and 3.

The

completion of NSM 22662 and 32662 on Units 2 and 3 respectively is

identified as

an inspection followup item 50-270,

287/87-51-02;

Completion of NSM 22662 and 32662.

10.

Public Document Room Review

The inspectors visited the Public Document Room, (PDR) for Oconee Nuclear

Station which is located in the Oconee County Library in Walhalla, South

Carolina. The Public Document Room librarian explained the facilities and

resources available and discussed with the inspectors how the document

room is utilized.

The

inspectors reviewed

the types of material

maintained in the facility.

Using the POR indexing system,

several

samples of information were located and reviewed. The facility appears to

be maintained in a very organized and efficient manner in accordance with

PDR directives.

The PDR custodian appeared very knowledgeable of her

duties and highly capable of maintaining the PDR.

9

Babcock and Wilcox Owners Group Plant Reassessment Program

In January 1986, NRR requested the Babcock and Wilcox Owners Group (BWOG)

to assume a leadership role in accomplishing key aspects of the overall

effort required for the reassessment of all

B&W plants.

The

BWOG

committed to take the lead in a planned effort to define concerns relative

to reducing the frequency of reactor trips and the complexity of post-trip

response in B&W plants.

The BWOG issued BAW-1919,

"Trip Reduction and

Transient Response Improvement Program" including 5 revisions as of July

1987. The NRC has reviewed BAW-1919 and its revisions and has issued a

Safety Evaluation Report (SER) (NUREG-1231). Some of the areas contained

in BAW-1919 are still in the process of being reviewed and will be

addressed in a supplement(s) to NUREG-1231.

Table 12.1 of the NUREG list

the 207 recommendations that were developed by the BWOG for implementation

considerations at each of the

B&W utilities.

These

recommendations

comprise the BWOG Safety and Performance Improvement Program (SPIP) which

has goals by the end of 1990, to reduce the average trip frequency per

plant to less than two per year and also that the number of complex

transients will be reduced to 0.1 per plant per year based on a moving

3-year average.

Attachment 1 to this report shows the completion to date

of the SPIP recommendations at Oconee.

ATTACHMENT 1

SAFETY AND PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM RECOMMENDATIONS

Recommendation

Number

Subject

Remarks

TR-007-ICS

Remove BTU limits from ICS

Complete

TR-011-ICS

Determine if the grid frequency

Complete

error circuit has been detuned

TR-012-ICS

Determine if operators have

Complete

necessary information from

procedures, indicators, etc.

to detect loss of NNI power

TR-013-ICS

Prevent loss of power to the ICS

  • Not

Applicable

TR-014-MFW

Install Monitoring Systems on

Rejected

MFW pumps to document causes

of pump trips

TR-018-MFW

Provide training on MFW system

Complete

components

TR-019-MFW

Ensure there are sufficient

Rejected

annunciator and trip signals

for MFW supply system

TR-020-MFW

Establish procedures for

Complete

switching MFW pump oil supply

TR-022-EFW

Review EFIC system low SG

  • Not

level setpoints

Applicable

TR-023-MSS

Determine need to replace MSSV

Complete

release nut cotter pins

TR-024-MSS

Determine causes to correct

Complete

anomalous post-trip performance

of MSSVs

TR-025-MTS

Review EHC system for loss of

Complete

input power

2

Recommendation

Number

Subject

Remarks

(cont'd)

TR-026-OPS

Operability of SG Shell

Complete

thermocouples

TR-027-ADM

Calculation techniques for power

Complete

range imbalance

TR-028-ADM

Training on power/imbalance control

Complete

TR-029-ADM

Include human error information

Complete

in TAP reports

TR-034-ICS

Training on loss of ICS power

Complete

TR-035-ICS

Familiarize operators with Rancho

Complete

Seco event

TR-036-ICS

Evaluate turbine bypass valve

  • Not

position on loss of ICS

Applicable

TR-037-ICS

Evaluate MFW pump speed control

  • Not

on loss of ICS power

Applicable

TR-039-ICS

Wire the power supply monitor in

  • Not

the ICS/NNI directly to the output

Applicable

bus after the auctioneering diodes

TR-041-MOV

Confirm by field inspection data

Complete

required to size operators and

valves for motor-operated valves

TR-042-MOV

Obtain analytic methods used by

Complete

valve and operator vendors

TR-050-MSS

Include in plant operating

Complete

procedures provisions for opening

steam trap bypass valves during

startup, and draining turbine

bypass header valves before

startup or cooldown

TR-051-OPS

Conduct postmaintenance and

Complete

surveillance PORV testing

TR-052-SFI

Filter steam generator level

  • Not

signals in steam feedwater

Applicable

rupture control system

3

Recommendation

Number

Subject

Remarks

(cont'd)

TR-053-SFI

Correct overheating problems

  • Not

that can lead to electric power

Applicable

supply malfunctions

TR-054-SFI

Redesign MSIV pneumatic hardware

  • Not

to ensure this equipment is

Applicable

exercised during surveillance

testing

TR-056-ADM

Move chain link fences to

Complete

provide better access to critical

components

TR-057-ADM

Consider ways to improve access

Complete

to critical components

TR-058-OPS

Use highest emergency classifi-

Complete

cation level when making initial

notification to NRC

TR-059-OPS

Training for personnel who make

Complete

emergency notifications

TR-061-OPS

For specific training identify

Complete

high priority operator tasks

during emergencies

TR-062-OPS

Maintain a high SPOS availability

Complete

by corrective and preventive

mai ntenance

TR-063-OPS

Ensure that PiT graphs are

Complete

provided in the control room

TR-064-OPS

Training for resetting turbine

Complete

driven EFW pumps

TR-065-OPS

Improve communications between

  • Not

control room and certain plant

Applicable

areas at Rancho Seco

TR-069-MFW

Eliminate automatic control of

Complete

the MFW block valve except during

a reactor trip

4

Recommendation

Number

Subject

Remarks

(cont'd)

TR-070-MFW

Provide capability to override a

Complete

"close" signal to the MFW block

valve

TR-074-MFW

Schedule I&C calibration and

Complete

inspection work to minimize the

number of times the MFW pump and

turbine instrumentation and

controls are disturbed

TR-077-MFW

Review and Upgrade preventive

  • Not

maintenance on auxiliary boilers

Applicable

TR-079-MFW

Put MFW regulating valves, main

Complete

block valves and startup control

valves on a refueling frequency

for an operational check

TR-080-MFW

Instrumentation to determine

Rejected

performance of MFWPT shaft

driven oil pump

TR-086-MFW

Improper draining of first-stage

  • Not

FW heaters

Applicable

TR-088-MFW

Eliminate automatic plant runback

  • Not

on low MFW pump discharge pressure

Applicable

or establish setpoint to achieve

a successful runback

TR-093-MFW

Allow full power operation using

Rejected

only two hotwell pumps (for Oconee

Units only)

TR-096-MSS

Evaluate design of turbine

Complete

bypass and atmospheric dump

(Portions

systems

rejected)

TR-097-EFW

Evaluate design of EFW flow

Complete

control Valves

TR-098-MFW

Overfill protection for MRW system

Complete

TR-099-OPS

Include guidance on excessive MFW,

Complete

throttling AFW, and throttling

HPI in plant procedures

5

Recommendation

Number

Subject

Remarks

(cont'd)

TR-100-MTS

Review MSR drain tank level control

Complete

and drain line configuration

TR-101-MTS

Operator training on main

Complete

generation excitation, voltage

control and operation

TR-111-RPS

Review safety system surveillance

Complete

procedures for checking which

channel is available for testing

before initiation of test

TR-114-PES

Evaluate hardware to ensure diesel

  • Not

generator cannot be synchronized

Applicable

to grid out of phase

TR-115-PES

Test diesel generators to assure

  • Not

they will carry loads under

Applicable

expected sequential load conditions

TR-123-IAS

For instrument air systems, protect

  • Not

against failures possible with

Applicable

dessicant-type driers

TR-126-IAS

Compare instrument air system

Complete

configuration with functional

target criteria

TR-128-IAS

Review training and loss of air

Complete

response procedures for

instrument air system

TR-139-IAS

Install on/off status and remote

Rejected

start of instrument air

compressors in the control room

(for Duke and FPC only)

TR-161-EFW

Evaluate the margin between the

  • Not

EFW and MFW low-level control

Applicable

points to prevent unneeded EFW

actuations

TR-162-EFW

Modify EFW flow control to

  • Not

provide smoother flow control

Applicable

rather than on-off control

6

Recommendation

Number

Subject

Remarks

(cont'd)

TR-163-EFW

Review EFW surveillance and test

Complete

procedures to ensure that

components used in the EOPs are

included in the test program

TR-169-MTS

Evaluate possibility for

  • Not

defeating the high vibration

Applicable

trip during main turbine valve

testing (for GE turbines only)

  • per DPC analysis