ML16138A638

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Safeguards Evaluation Rept Supporting Amends 169,169 & 166 to Licenses DPR-38,DPR-47 & DPR-55,respectively
ML16138A638
Person / Time
Site: Oconee  
Issue date: 08/19/1988
From:
NRC
To:
Shared Package
ML16138A639 List:
References
NUDOCS 8808240420
Download: ML16138A638 (4)


Text

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION o

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 SAFEGUARDS EVALUATION REPORT MISCELLANEOUS AMENDMENTS AND SEARCH REQUIREMENTS DUKE POWER COMPANY OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION, UNITS 1, 2 AND 3 DOCKET NOS. 50-269, 50-270 AND 50-287

1.0 INTRODUCTION

The Duke Power Company (DUKE) has filed with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission revisions to their Physical Security Plan for the Oconee Nuclear Station, Units 1, 2, and 3. We reviewed Duke's letters dated December 2, 1986, November 9, 1987, and January 15, 1988.

This Safeguards Evaluation Report (SGER) summarizes how Duke proposes to meet the Miscellaneous Amendments and Search Requirements revisions of 10 CFR Part 73.55.

Based on a review of the Physical Security Plan, the staff has concluded that the proposed changes satisfy Miscellaneous Amendments and Search Requirements revisions to 10 CFR 73.55 (51 FR 27817 and 27822) and accompanying 10 CFR 73.70 record reporting requirements. Accordingly, the protection provided will ensure that the public health and safety will not be endangered.

2.0 PERSONNEL SEARCH Duke has committed in the Physical Security Plan to provide a search of all individuals entering the protected area except bona fide Federal, State and local law enforcement personnel on official duty, through the use of equipment designed for the detection of firearms, explosives, and incendiary devices.

In addition, Duke has committed to conduct a physical pat-down search of an individual whenever Duke has cause to suspect that the individual is attempting to introduce firearms, explosives, or incendiary devices into the protected areas; or whenever firearms or explosives detection equipment is out of service or not operating satisfactorily.

3.0 VITAL AREA ACCESS Duke has modified their Oconee Nuclear Station, Units 1, 2, and 3, Physical Security Plan to limit unescorted access to vital areas during non-emergency conditions to individuals who require access to perform their duties. They have established current authorization access lists for each vital area which are updated and approved by the cognizant manager or supervisor at least once

,s8OE24b420 SSOC

1.

88OC)206 9 PDR PDC P

-2 every 31 days. Duke has assured that only individuals whose specific duties require access to vital areas during non-emergency conditions are included on their site-access list. Duke has provided further assurance by revoking access and retrieving badges and other entry devices before or simultaneously with notification of termination of an individual's unescorted facility access.

Based upon commitments made by the licensee in revisions to their Physical Security Plan, the staff has concluded that Duke meets the vital area access requirements of 10 CFR 73.55(d)(7)(i)(A), (B) and (C).

4.0 LOCKS AND KEYS The licensee has committed to providing methods which reduce the probability of compromise of keys, locks, combinations, and related access control devices used to control access to their protected areas and vital areas. These methods include: (1) rotating keys, locks, combinations, and related access control devices every 12 months or (2) changing these devices whenever there is evidence or suspicion that any key,-lock, combination or related access control device may have been compromised or when an individual who has had access to any of these devices has had their access terminated because of a lack of trustworthiness, reliability or inadequate work performance. Only persons granted unescorted facility access are issued such entry devices.

Based upon commitments made by Duke in revisions to their Physical Security Plan, the staff has concluded that Duke meets the requirements of 10 CFR 73.55(d)(9) to reduce the probability of compromise of keys, locks, combinations, and related access control devices.

5.0 EMERGENCY ACCESS During emergency conditions or situations that could lead to emergency conditions, Duke has committed to provide for the rapid ingress and egress of individuals by assuring prompt access to vital equipment. An annual review of their physical security plans and contingency plans and procedures will be conducted to evaluate their potential impact on plant and personnel safety. Emergency access is granted by a licensed senior operator.

Based upon commitments made by Duke in revisions to their Physical Security Plan, the staff has concluded that Duke meets the requirements of 10 CFR 73.55(d)(7)(ii) to assure access to vital equipment during emergencies or to situations that may lead to an emergency.

6.0 PROTECTION OF SECONDARY POWER SUPPLIES Duke has committed to protect the on-site secondary power supply system for alarm annunciator equipment and non-portable communications equipment by including such equipment within a vital area boundary.

Based upon commitments made by Duke in revisions to their Physical Security Plan, the staff has concluded that Duke meets the requirements of 10 CFR 73.55(e) in protecting the secondary power supplies of alarm annunciator equipment and non-portable communications equipment.

-3 7.0 VITAL AREA ENTRY/EXIT LOGGING Duke has committed to maintain a log that indicates the name, badge number, time of entry, and time of exit of all individuals granted access to a vital area except for those individuals entering or exiting the reactor control room.

Based upon commitments made by Duke in revisions to their Physical Security Plan, the staff has concluded that Duke meets the requirements of 10 CFR 73.70(d) by maintaining entry/exit log of individuals accessing vital areas (except the reactor control room).

8.0 CONCLUSION

Based upon the above evaluation, we find that Duke has met the requirements of the Miscellaneous Amendments and Search Requirements revision to 10 CFR Part 73.55 and the record reporting requirements of 10 CFR Part 73.70.

Principal Contributor:

J. Gibson, NRR Dated:

August 19, 1988

Mr. H. B. Tucker Oconee Nuclear Station Duke Power Company Units Nos. 1, 2 and 3 cc:

Mr. A. V. Carr, Esq.

Mr. Paul Guill Duke Power Company Duke Power Company P. 0. Box 33189 Post Office Box 33189 422 South Church Street 422 South Church Street Charlotte, North Carolina 28242 Charlotte, North Carolina 28242 J. Michael McGarry, III, Esq.

Bishop, Liberman, Cook, Purcell & Reynolds 1200 Seventeenth Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20036 Mr. Robert B. Borsum Babcock & Wilcox Nuclear Power Generation Division Suite 525 1700 Rockville Pike Rockville, Maryland 20852 Manager, LIS NUS Corporation 2536 Countryside Boulevard Clearwater, Florida 33515 Senior Resident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Route 2, Box 610 Seneca, South Carolina 29678 Regional Administrator, Region II U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 101 Marietta Street, N.W., Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Mr. Heyward G. Shealy, Chief Bureau of Radiological Health South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control 2600 Bull Street Columbia, South Carolina 29201 Office of Intergovernmental Relations 116 West Jones Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27603 Honorable James M. Phinney County Supervisor of Oconee County Walhalla, South Carolina 29621