ML16005A010

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review for Indian Point 2/3 Mtc Measurement
ML16005A010
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 01/04/2016
From: Pickett D
Plant Licensing Branch 1
To: Prussman S
Entergy Nuclear Operations
References
MF7193, MF7194
Download: ML16005A010 (2)


Text

NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Pickett, Douglas Sent: Monday, January 04, 2016 4:22 PM To: Prussman, Stephen G (SPrussm@entergy.com)

Cc: MacFee, William; Jackson, Christopher; Tate, Travis

Subject:

Acceptance Review for Indian Point 2/3 MTC Measurement Mr. Prussman:

By letter dated December 10, 2015 (CAC MF7193 and MF7194), Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. submitted a license amendment request for Indian Point Unit Nos. 2 and 3. The license amendment request would change the near-end of life Moderator Temperature Coefficient Surveillance Requirement 3.1.3.2 and TS 5.6.5.

The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concludes that it provides technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.

Please contact me if you have any questions. A copy of this email will be made publicly available in ADAMS.

Douglas V. Pickett, Senior Project Manager Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 & 3 James A FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant Douglas.Pickett@nrc.gov 301-415-1364 1

Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 2572 Mail Envelope Properties (Douglas.Pickett@nrc.gov20160104162200)

Subject:

Acceptance Review for Indian Point 2/3 MTC Measurement Sent Date: 1/4/2016 4:22:04 PM Received Date: 1/4/2016 4:22:00 PM From: Pickett, Douglas Created By: Douglas.Pickett@nrc.gov Recipients:

"MacFee, William" <William.MacFee@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "Jackson, Christopher" <Christopher.Jackson@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "Tate, Travis" <Travis.Tate@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "Prussman, Stephen G (SPrussm@entergy.com)" <SPrussm@entergy.com>

Tracking Status: None Post Office:

Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1963 1/4/2016 4:22:00 PM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received:

NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Pickett, Douglas Sent: Monday, January 04, 2016 4:22 PM To: Prussman, Stephen G (SPrussm@entergy.com)

Cc: MacFee, William; Jackson, Christopher; Tate, Travis

Subject:

Acceptance Review for Indian Point 2/3 MTC Measurement Mr. Prussman:

By letter dated December 10, 2015 (CAC MF7193 and MF7194), Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. submitted a license amendment request for Indian Point Unit Nos. 2 and 3. The license amendment request would change the near-end of life Moderator Temperature Coefficient Surveillance Requirement 3.1.3.2 and TS 5.6.5.

The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concludes that it provides technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.

Please contact me if you have any questions. A copy of this email will be made publicly available in ADAMS.

Douglas V. Pickett, Senior Project Manager Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 & 3 James A FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant Douglas.Pickett@nrc.gov 301-415-1364 1

Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 2572 Mail Envelope Properties (Douglas.Pickett@nrc.gov20160104162200)

Subject:

Acceptance Review for Indian Point 2/3 MTC Measurement Sent Date: 1/4/2016 4:22:04 PM Received Date: 1/4/2016 4:22:00 PM From: Pickett, Douglas Created By: Douglas.Pickett@nrc.gov Recipients:

"MacFee, William" <William.MacFee@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "Jackson, Christopher" <Christopher.Jackson@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "Tate, Travis" <Travis.Tate@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "Prussman, Stephen G (SPrussm@entergy.com)" <SPrussm@entergy.com>

Tracking Status: None Post Office:

Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1963 1/4/2016 4:22:00 PM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received: