ML15351A512

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
EA-14-193; Federal Register Notice and Confirmatory Order Related to NRC Reports No. 05000263/2015008; 07200058/2014001 and OI Report 3-2014-004; Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant
ML15351A512
Person / Time
Site: Monticello  Xcel Energy icon.png
Issue date: 12/21/2015
From: Pederson C
NRC/RGN-III
To:
Northern States Power Co
Skokowski R
References
EA-14-193, NRC-2015-0289
Download: ML15351A512 (17)


See also: IR 05000263/2015008

Text

[7590-01-P]

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[EA-14-193; NRC-2015-0289]

In the Matter of Northern States Power Company, Minnesota

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission

ACTION: Confirmatory order; issuance.

SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and Northern States Power

Company, Minnesota, doing business as Xcel Energy, engaged in mediation as part of the

NRCs Alternative Dispute Resolution Program which resulted in a settlement agreement as

reflected in the Confirmatory Order (CO) related to Xcel Energy. The purpose of the CO is to

ensure that the licensee restores compliance with NRC regulations.

DATES: Effective Date: January 20, 2016

ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2015-0289 when contacting the NRC about the

availability of information regarding this document. You may obtain publicly-available

information related to this action using any of the following methods:

Docket ID NRC-2015-0289. Address questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher;

telephone: 301-415-3463; e-mail: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For technical questions, contact

the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document.

  • NRCs Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS):

You may access publicly available documents online in the ADAMS Public Documents

collection at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ADAMS

Public Documents and then select Begin Web-based ADAMS Search. For problems with

ADAMS, please contact the NRCs Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1-800-397-

4209, 301-415-4737, or by e-mail to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The ADAMS accession number for

each document referenced in this document (if that document is available in ADAMS) is

provided the first time that a document is referenced.

  • NRCs PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public documents at the

NRCs PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland

20852.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kenneth Lambert, Region III, U.S. Nuclear

Regulatory Commission, Lisle, Illinois, 60532; telephone: 630-810-4376, e-mail:

Kenneth.Lambert@nrc.gov.

2

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The text of the Order is attached.

Dated at Lisle, Illinois this 21st day of December, 2015

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission

/RA/

Cynthia D. Pederson

Regional Administrator

3

Attachment - CONFIRMATORY ORDER MODIFYING LICENSE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

In the Matter of )

) Docket Nos. 50-263;72-058

Northern States Power Company, Minnesota ) License No. DPR-22

(Doing business as Xcel Energy) ) EA-14-193

Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant )

CONFIRMATORY ORDER MODIFYING LICENSE

I.

Northern States Power Company, Minnesota, doing business as Xcel Energy,

(Licensee) is the holder of Reactor Operating License No. DPR-22 issued by the U.S. Nuclear

Regulatory Commission (NRC or Commission) pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal

Regulations (10 CFR) Part 50 on September 8, 1970, and renewed on November 8, 2006. The

license authorizes the operation of the Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant (Monticello) in

accordance with conditions specified therein. The facility is located on the Licensee's site in

Monticello, Minnesota.

This Confirmatory Order is the result of an agreement reached during an alternative

dispute resolution (ADR) mediation session conducted on October 15, 2015.

II.

On December 18, 2013, the NRC Office of Investigations (OI), Region III Field Office

initiated an investigation (OI Case No. 3-2014-004) to determine whether two contractor

technicians at the Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant deliberately failed to perform

4

nondestructive examinations (NDEs) on the Dry Shielded Canisters (DSCs) in accordance with

procedural requirements, and to determine whether they falsified records when recording the

NDE results. The results of the investigation, completed on November 13, 2014, were sent to

Xcel Energy in a letter dated July 23, 2015 (ML15203B187). Based on the review of the OI

investigation report the NRC determined that both contractor technicians willfully violated 10 CFR 72.158, Control of special processes, and 10 CFR 72.11, Completeness and accuracy of

information. In addition, the NRC determined the licensee violated Title 10 CFR 72.154(c),

Control of purchased material, equipment, and services.

Specifically, on October 17, 2013, an NRC inspector observed, by video display, the

NDE liquid penetrant testing (PT) of the outer top cover plate weld for DSCs being conducted by

a contractor technician. The inspector believed that the technician failed to comply with

procedural requirements in conducting the PT. The inspector reviewed the procedure,

confirmed that the PT was not being performed in accordance with the procedure, and notified

Monticello management. Monticello management and the NDE contractor management

reviewed the video, and concluded the PT was not performed properly. Upon further review,

the NRC inspector determined that two contractor NDE technicians were involved in performing

the PT examinations. These individuals were involved with examining a total of 66 welds on six

DSCs.

Based on the evidence gathered in the OI investigation, the NRC determined that the

two NDE contractors deliberately violated NRC requirements by failing to perform NDE PT of

DSCs, a special process, in accordance with procedures by not allowing the developer to dwell

for the period of time specified in procedure 12751 QP-9.202, Rev. 1, Color Contrast Liquid

Penetrant Examination using the Solvent-Removable Method. Their actions caused the

licensee to be in violation of Certificate of Compliance 1004, Amendment 10, Technical Specification 1.2.5, DSC Dye Penetrant Tests of Closure Welds, which was implemented by

5

the procedure, and 10 CFR 72.158, as NDE testing, a special process, was not accomplished in

accordance with the applicable standards and requirements.

The NRC further determined that the two contractors willfully violated NRC requirements

by recording false information concerning developer dwell times on the PT examination report

for each NDE. This caused the licensee to be in violation of 10 CFR 72.11(a), which requires

information required to be maintained by the licensee to be complete and accurate in all

material respects.

The NRC also determined the licensee failed to assess the effectiveness of the controls

of quality by the contractors. Specifically, the licensee did not adequately monitor the work of

the contractors performing PT testing on DSCs No. 11 through 16. This caused the licensee to

be in violation of 10 CFR 72.154(c), Control of purchased material, equipment, and services,

which required, in part, that licensees assess the effectiveness of the control of quality by

contractors and subcontractors at intervals consistent with the importance, complexity, and

quantity of the product or services.

In response to the NRCs offer, Xcel Energy requested use of the NRC ADR process to

resolve differences it had with the NRC. Alternative Dispute Resolution is a process in which a

neutral mediator with no decision-making authority assists the parties in reaching an agreement

on resolving any differences regarding the dispute. On October 15, 2015, Xcel Energy and the

NRC met in an ADR session mediated by a professional mediator, arranged through the Cornell

Universitys Institute on Conflict Resolution.

6

III.

During the ADR session, a preliminary settlement agreement was reached. This

Confirmatory Order is issued pursuant to the agreement reached during the ADR process. The

elements of the agreement, as signed by both parties, consisted of the following:

1. The licensee shall restore compliance to 10 CFR Part 72 to DSCs 11 through 16 within 5

years of the date the NRC takes final action upon the September 29, 2015, exemption

request pending for DSC 16 (ML15275A023), or the exemption request is withdrawn,

whichever is earlier.

2. Within 180 calendar days of the NRCs final action on the docketed exemption request

dated September 29, 2015 (ML15275A023), or the date the exemption request is

withdrawn, whichever is earlier, the licensee shall submit a project plan to the Director,

Division of Nuclear Materials Safety (DNMS), Region III, for returning DSCs 11 through

16 to compliance to 10 CFR Part 72.

3. Within 180 calendar days after submittal of the DSCs 11 through 16 project plan, Xcel

Energy shall submit a letter to the Director, DNMS, Region III, regarding progress under

the plan, and any non-editorial changes to the plan. A letter providing a progress update

and any non-editorial plan changes shall be provided every 360 calendar days thereafter

to the Director, DNMS, Region III, until the plan is completed.

4. Within 90 calendar days of the issuance date of the Confirmatory Order, Xcel Energy

shall evaluate Monticellos dry fuel storage procedures and ensure the procedures

require direct licensee oversight during the entire evolution of each dye penetrant test

performed by contractors on DSC closure welds.

5. Within 120 calendar days of the issuance date of the Confirmatory Order, Xcel Energy

shall ensure and document that all first line supervisors and above, who oversee

contractors performing field work in the Xcel Energy nuclear fleet, review the

7

circumstances and lessons learned from the events that gave rise to the Confirmatory

Order.

6. Within 360 calendar days of the issuance date of the Confirmatory Order, the licensee

shall assess and document the effectiveness of improvements in oversight of

supplemental workers (e.g., contractors) in the Xcel Energy nuclear fleet, including the

actions taken in item 5.

7. Within 540 calendar days of the issuance date of the Confirmatory Order, Xcel Energy

shall develop and make a presentation based on the facts and lessons learned from the

events that gave rise to the Confirmatory Order, with emphasis on corrective actions

taken as a result. Xcel Energy agrees to make this presentation at an appropriate

industry forum such that industry personnel across the entirety of the United States

would have the opportunity to receive the material. Xcel Energy shall inform the

Director, DNMS, Region III, of where the presentation will be made, and shall make the

presentation materials available to the NRC for review at least 30 calendar days in

advance of the presentation.

8. Within 360 calendar days of the issuance date of the Confirmatory Order, Xcel Energy

shall submit an article to an industry publication, such as UxC Spent Fuel, describing the

circumstances of the violation, the root and contributing causes, and the corrective

actions. The licensee shall provide a draft to the Director, DNMS, Region III, at least 30

calendar days in advance of the submittal.

9. Upon completion of all terms of the Confirmatory Order, Xcel Energy shall submit to the

NRC a letter discussing its basis for concluding that the Order has been satisfied.

In addition to the elements described above, Xcel Energy took the following corrective actions:

8

1. Xcel Energy revised its nuclear fleet Nuclear Oversight (NOS) and Supply Chain

procedures to require the establishment of a NOS Project Oversight Plan for any

Safety-Related or Augmented Quality fabrication or construction activities performed at

the nuclear plant sites under a suppliers Quality Assurance (QA) Program. The NOS

procedure for project oversight was also revised to address site project implementation

in addition to project component fabrication, and associated project risks. Upfront

planning of the level and type NOS oversight is based on those risks.

2. Xcel Energy created a nuclear fleet procedure for oversight of supplemental personnel

(e.g., contractors) based upon the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations (INPO) AP-930

Supplemental Personnel Process Description, which includes a requirement that each

incoming contract worker have a face-to-face review of station standards, expectations,

and requirements with the Maintenance Manager or designee. This includes current and

all future contract personnel including contract quality control (QC) inspectors.

3. Xcel Energy issued a rapid operational experience notice for this event, which prompted

a review of the event by Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant staff and shared the

event with the nuclear industry through a process called the INPO Consolidated Event

System (ICES).

4. Xcel Energy reviewed its General Access Training to ensure it addresses the

consequences of willful violations.

In exchange for the commitments and corrective actions taken by the licensee, the NRC

agrees to the following conditions:

1. The NRC will consider the Confirmatory Order as an escalated enforcement action for a

period of one year from its issuance date.

2. The NRC will refrain from issuing a Notice of Violation and a proposed imposition of a

civil penalty.

9

This agreement is binding upon the successors and assigns of Xcel Energy.

On December 10, 2015, Xcel Energy consented to issuing this Confirmatory Order with

the commitments, as described in Section V below. Xcel Energy further agreed that this

Confirmatory Order is to be effective 30 calendar days after issuance of the Confirmatory Order

and that it has waived its right to a hearing.

IV.

Since the licensee agreed to take additional actions to address NRC concerns, as set

forth in Section III above, the NRC concluded that its concerns can be resolved through

issuance of this Confirmatory Order.

I find that Xcel Energys commitments as set forth in Section V are acceptable and

necessary and conclude that with these commitments the public health and safety are

reasonably assured. In view of the foregoing, I have determined that public health and safety

require that Xcel Energys commitments be confirmed by this Confirmatory Order. Based on the

above and Xcel Energys consent, this Confirmatory Order is effective 30 calendar days after

issuance of the Confirmatory Order.

V.

Accordingly, pursuant to Sections 104b, 161b, 161i, 161o, 182, and 186 of the Atomic

Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and the Commissions regulations in 10 CFR 2.202, 10 CFR

Part 50 and 10 CFR Part 72, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT THE ACTIONS DESCRIBED

BELOW WILL BE TAKEN AT MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT AND OTHER

NUCLEAR PLANTS IN XCEL ENERGYS FLEET WHERE INDICATED AND THAT LICENSE

10

NO. DPR-22 IS MODIFIED AS FOLLOWS WITH RESPECT TO THE ACTIONS TO BE TAKEN

AT THE MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT:

1. The licensee shall restore compliance to 10 CFR part 72 to DSCs 11 through 16 within

5 years of the date the NRC takes final action upon the September 29, 2015, exemption

request pending for DSC 16 (ML15275A023), or the exemption request is withdrawn,

whichever is earlier.

2. Within 180 calendar days of the NRCs final action on the docketed exemption request

dated September 29, 2015 (ML15275A023), or the date the exemption request is

withdrawn, whichever is earlier, the licensee shall submit a project plan to the Director,

Division of Nuclear Materials Safety, Region III, for returning DSCs 11 through 16 to

compliance to 10 CFR part 72.

3. Within 180 days after submittal of the DSCs 11 through 16 project plan, Xcel Energy

shall submit a letter to the Director, DNMS, Region III, regarding progress under the

plan, and any non-editorial changes to the plan. A letter providing a progress update

and any non-editorial plan changes shall be provided every 360 calendar days thereafter

to the Director, DNMS, Region III, until the plan is completed.

4. Within 90 calendar days of the issuance date of the Confirmatory Order, Xcel Energy

shall evaluate Monticellos dry fuel storage procedures and ensure the procedures

require direct licensee oversight during the entire evolution of each dye penetrant test

performed by contractors on DSC closure welds.

5. Within 120 calendar days of the issuance date of the Confirmatory Order, Xcel Energy

shall ensure and document that all first line supervisors and above, who oversee

contractors performing field work in the Xcel Energy nuclear fleet, review the

circumstances and lessons learned from the events that gave rise to the Confirmatory

Order.

11

6. Within 360 calendar days of the issuance date of the Confirmatory Order, the licensee

shall assess and document the effectiveness of improvements in oversight of

supplemental workers (e.g., contractors) in the Xcel Energy nuclear fleet, including the

actions taken in item 5.

7. Within 540 calendar days of the issuance date of the Confirmatory Order, Xcel Energy

shall develop and make a presentation based on the facts and lessons learned from the

events that gave rise to the Confirmatory Order, with emphasis on corrective actions

taken as a result. Xcel Energy agrees to make this presentation at an appropriate

industry forum such that industry personnel across the entirety of the United States

would have the opportunity to receive the material. Xcel Energy shall inform the

Director, DNMS, Region III, of where the presentation will be made, and make the

presentation materials available to the NRC for review at least 30 calendar days in

advance of the presentation.

8. Within 360 calendar days of the issuance date of the Confirmatory Order, Xcel Energy

shall submit an article to an industry publication, such as UxC Spent Fuel, describing the

circumstances of the violation, the root and contributing causes, and the corrective

actions. The licensee shall provide a draft to the Director, DNMS, Region III, at least

30 calendar days in advance of the submittal.

9. Upon completion of all terms of the Confirmatory Order, Xcel Energy shall submit to the

NRC a letter discussing its basis for concluding that the Order has been satisfied.

The Regional Administrator, Region III, may, in writing, relax or rescind any of the above

conditions upon demonstration by the Licensee of good cause.

12

VI.

Any person adversely affected by this Confirmatory Order, other than Xcel Nuclear, may

request a hearing within 30 days of the issuance date of this Confirmatory Order. Where good

cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the time to request a hearing. A

request for extension of time must be directed to the Director, Office of Enforcement, U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and include a statement of good cause for the extension.

All documents filed in NRC adjudicatory proceedings, including a request for hearing, a

petition for leave to intervene, any motion or other document filed in the proceeding prior to the

submission of a request for hearing or petition to intervene, and documents filed by interested

governmental entities participating under 10 CFR 2.315(c), must be filed in accordance with the

NRCs E-Filing rule (72 FR 49139; August 28, 2007), as amended by 77 FR 46562;

August 3, 2012 (codified in pertinent part at 10 CFR Part 2, Subpart C). The E-Filing process

requires participants to submit and serve all adjudicatory documents over the internet, or in

some cases to mail copies on electronic storage media. Participants may not submit paper

copies of their filings unless they seek an exemption in accordance with the procedures

described below.

To comply with the procedural requirements of E-Filing, at least ten (10) days prior to the

filing deadline, the participant should contact the Office of the Secretary by e-mail at

hearing.docket@nrc.gov, or by telephone at 301-415-1677, to (1) request a digital (ID)

certificate, which allows the participant (or its counsel or representative) to digitally sign

documents and access the E-Submittal server for any proceeding in which it is participating;

and (2) advise the Secretary that the participant will be submitting a request or petition for

hearing (even in instances in which the participant, or its counsel or representative, already

holds an NRC-issued digital ID certificate). Based upon this information, the Secretary will

13

establish an electronic docket for the hearing in this proceeding if the Secretary has not already

established an electronic docket.

Information about applying for a digital ID certificate is available on NRCs public Web

site at http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html. System requirements for accessing the

E-Submittal server are detailed in NRCs Guidance for Electronic Submission, which is

available on the agencys public Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html.

Participants may attempt to use other software not listed on the Web site, but should note that

the NRCs E-Filing system does not support unlisted software, and the NRC Meta System

Help Desk will not be able to offer assistance in using unlisted software.

If a participant is electronically submitting a document to the NRC in accordance with the

E-Filing rule, the participant must file the document using the NRCs online, Web-based

submission form. In order to serve documents through the Electronic Information Exchange

(EIE), users will be required to install a Web browser plug-in from the NRC Web site.

Further information on the Web-based submission form, including the installation of the

Web browser plug-in, is available on the NRCs public Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/site-

help/e-submittals.html.

Once a participant has obtained a digital ID certificate and a docket has been created,

the participant can then submit a request for hearing or petition for leave to intervene through

the EIE. Submissions should be in Portable Document Format (PDF) in accordance with NRC

guidance available on the NRCs public Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-

submittals.html. A filing is considered complete at the time the documents are submitted

through the NRCs E-Filing system. To be timely, an electronic filing must be submitted to the

E-Filing system no later than 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time (ET) on the due date. Upon receipt of a

transmission, the E-Filing system time-stamps the document and sends the submitter an e-mail

notice confirming receipt of the document. The E-Filing system also distributes an e-mail notice

that provides access to the document to the NRCs Office of the General Counsel and any

14

others who have advised the Office of the Secretary that they wish to participate in the

proceeding, so that the filer need not serve the documents on those participants separately.

Therefore, any others who wish to participate in the proceeding (or their counsel or

representative) must apply for and receive a digital ID certificate before a hearing request/

petition to intervene is filed so that they can obtain access to the document via the E-Filing

system.

A person filing electronically using the NRCs adjudicatory E-Filing system may seek

assistance by contacting the NRC Meta System Help Desk through the Contact Us link located

on the NRCs Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html, by e-mail at

MSHD.Resource@nrc.gov, or by a toll-free call at (866) 672-7640. The NRC Meta System

Help Desk is available between 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m., ET, Monday through Friday, excluding

government holidays.

Participants who believe that they have a good cause for not submitting documents

electronically must file an exemption request, in accordance with 10 CFR 2.302(g), with their

initial paper filing requesting authorization to continue to submit documents in paper format.

Such filings must be submitted by: (1) first class mail addressed to the Office of the Secretary

of the Commission, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001,

Attention: Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff; or (2) courier, express mail, or expedited

delivery service to the Office of the Secretary, Sixteenth Floor, One White Flint North,

11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland, 20852, Attention: Rulemaking and Adjudications

Staff. Participants filing a document in this manner are responsible for serving the document

on all other participants. Filing is considered complete by first-class mail as of the time of

deposit in the mail, or by courier, express mail, or expedited delivery service upon depositing

the document with the provider of the service. A presiding officer, having granted an exemption

request from using E-Filing, may require a participant or party to use E-Filing if the presiding

15

officer subsequently determines that the reason for granting the exemption from use of E-Filing

no longer exists.

Documents submitted in adjudicatory proceedings will appear in the NRCs electronic

hearing docket, which is available to the public at http://ehd1.nrc.gov/ehd/, unless excluded

pursuant to an order of the Commission or the presiding officer. Participants are requested not

to include personal privacy information, such as social security numbers, home addresses, or

home phone numbers in their filings, unless an NRC regulation or other law requires submission

of such information. With respect to copyrighted works, participants are requested not to

include copyrighted materials in their submission, except for limited excerpts that serve the

purpose of the adjudicatory filings and would constitute a Fair Use application.

If a person other than the licensee requests a hearing, that person shall set forth with

particularity the manner in which his interest is adversely affected by this Confirmatory Order

and shall address the criteria set forth in 10 CFR 2.309(d) and (f).

If a hearing is requested by a person whose interest is adversely affected, the

Commission will issue a separate Order designating the time and place of any hearings, as

appropriate. If a hearing is held, the issue to be considered at such hearing shall be whether

this Confirmatory Order should be sustained.

In the absence of any request for hearing, or written approval of an extension of time in

which to request a hearing, the provisions specified in Section V above shall be final 30 days after

issuance of the Confirmatory Order without further order or proceedings. If an extension of time

16

for requesting a hearing has been approved, the provisions specified in Section V shall be final

when the extension expires if a hearing request has not been received.

Dated at Lisle, Illinois this 21st day of December, 2015

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission

/RA/

Cynthia D. Pederson

Regional Administrator

17