ML15328A502

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Request for Information for an NRC Triennial Baseline Component Design Bases Inspection; Inspection Report 05000456/2016008; 05000457/2016008 (Bxj)
ML15328A502
Person / Time
Site: Braidwood  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 11/24/2015
From: Christine Lipa
NRC/RGN-III/DRS/EB2
To: Bryan Hanson
Exelon Generation Co
References
IR 2016008
Download: ML15328A502 (8)


See also: IR 05000456/2016008

Text

UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION III

2443 WARRENVILLE RD. SUITE 210

LISLE, IL 60532-4352

November 24, 2015

Mr. Bryan C. Hanson

Senior VP, Exelon Generation Company, LLC

President and CNO, Exelon Nuclear

4300 Winfield Road

Warrenville, IL 60555

SUBJECT: BRAIDWOOD STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 - REQUEST FOR INFORMATION FOR

AN NRC TRIENNIAL BASELINE COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION;

INSPECTION REPORT 05000456/2016008; 05000457/2016008.

Dear Mr. Hanson:

On February 22, 2016, the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) will begin a

Triennial Baseline Component Design Bases Inspection (CDBI) at the Braidwood Station,

Units 1 and 2. This inspection will be performed in accordance with NRC Baseline Inspection

Procedure 71111.21.

The CDBI focuses on the design, maintenance, and operation of risk-significant components

associated with one or more accident scenario or systems. The components to be reviewed

during this baseline inspection will be identified during the in-office preparation week that occurs

prior to the first onsite inspection week. In addition, operating experience issues, associated

with the component samples, will also be selected for review. The inspection team may request

scenarios to be performed on the simulator. This request would require support from your

simulator staff to validate scenarios, simulator time, and a crew to perform the actions which

would most likely occur during the second on-site week. The team will work closely with your

staff early on during the inspection process to ensure this activity can be accomplished with

minimal impact.

The inspection will include 3 weeks onsite. The inspection team will consist of six NRC

inspectors, of which five will focus on engineering/maintenance and one on operations.

The current inspection schedule is as follows:

Onsite weeks:

February 22 - 26, 2016;

March 7 - 11, 2016; and

March 21 - 25, 2016.

The team will be preparing for the inspection, mainly during the week of February 15, 2016,

as discussed in the attached enclosure.

B. Hanson

-2-

Experience with previous baseline design inspections of similar depth and length has shown

that this type of inspection is extremely resource intensive, both for the NRC inspectors and the

licensee staff. In order to minimize the inspection impact on the site and to ensure a productive

inspection for both parties, we have enclosed a request for information needed for the

inspection.

It is important that all of these documents are up-to-date and complete in order to minimize the

number of additional documents requested during the preparation and/or the on-site portions of

the inspection. Insofar as possible, this information should be provided electronically to the lead

inspector. The information request has been divided into three groups:

The first group lists information necessary for our initial inspection scoping activities.

This information should be provided to the lead inspector no later than January 18, 2016.

By January 25, 2016, the lead inspector will communicate the initial selected set of

approximately 15 components.

The second group of documents requested is those items needed to support our

in-office preparation activities. This set of documents, including the calculations

associated with the initial selected components, should be provided to the lead inspector

at the Regional Office no later than February 5, 2016. During the in-office preparation

activities, the team may identify additional information needed to support the inspection.

The last group includes the additional information above as well as plant specific

reference material. This information should be available to the team onsite on

February 22, 2016. It is also requested that corrective action documents and/or

questions developed during the inspection be provided to the lead inspector as the

documents are generated.

The lead inspector for this inspection is Mr. Benny Jose. We understand that our licensing

contact for this inspection is Mr. Richard Schliessmann of your organization. If there are any

questions about the inspection or the material requested in the enclosure, please contact the

lead inspector at (630) 829-9756, or via e-mail at Benny.Jose@nrc.gov.

This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject to

the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information

collection requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, Control

Number 3150-0011. The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to

respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the

requesting document displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget Control

Number.

In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 2.390, Public

Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding, of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy

of this letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public

B. Hanson

-3-

inspection in the NRCs Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records

(PARS)component of the NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System

(ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-

rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Sincerely,

/RA/

Christine A. Lipa, Chief

Engineering Branch 2

Division of Reactor Safety

Docket Nos. 50-456; 50-457

License Nos. NPF-72; NPF-77

Enclosure:

Information Request for Component Design Bases Inspection

cc w/encl: Distribution via LISTSERV

INFORMATION REQUEST FOR COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION

Enclosure

Inspection Report: 05000456/2016008; 05000457/2016008

Inspection Dates:

February 22 - 26, 2016;

March 7-11, 2016; and

March 21-25, 2016.

Inspection Procedure:

IP 71111.21 Component Design Bases Inspection

Lead Inspector:

Benny Jose, Senior Reactor Engineer, DRS

(630) 829-9756

Benny.Jose@nrc.gov

I.

Information Requested Prior to the Onsite Information Gathering/Inspection Week

The following information is requested by January 18, or sooner, to facilitate inspection

preparation. If you have any questions regarding this information, please call the team

leader as soon as possible. (Please provide the information electronically in pdf files,

Excel, or other searchable formats, preferably on some portable electronic media

(e.g., CDROM, DVD, flash drive, etc.). The portable electronic media should contain

descriptive names, and be indexed and hyperlinked to facilitate ease of use. Information

in lists should contain enough information to be easily understood by someone who

has knowledge of light water reactor technology).

1. Risk-ranking of top 250 components from your site specific Probabilistic Safety

Analysis (PSA) sorted by Risk-Achievement Worth (RAW). Include values for

Birnbaum Importance, Risk-Reduction Worth, and Fussell-Veseley (as applicable).

2. Risk-ranking of top 100 containment-related components (i.e., Large Early Release

Frequency) from your site specific PSA sorted by RAW.

3. Provide a list of the top 200 cut-sets from your PSA.

4. Provide a list of the top 100 cut-sets for each initiator modeled in the PSA that

contributes more than 5 percent to the baseline plant core damage frequency.

5. Copies of PSA system notebooks, and latest PSA summary document.

6. List of time critical operator actions. Identify those actions that do not have job

performance measures.

7. Provide copies of the emergency operating procedures.

8. If you have an External Events or Fire PSA Model, provide the information requested

in Items 1 and 2 for external events and fire. Provide narrative description of each

coded event (including fire, flood zone description).

9. Electronic copy of the site Individual Plant Examination of External Events, if

available.

INFORMATION REQUEST FOR COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION

2

10. Any pre-existing evaluation or list of components and associated calculations with

low design margins, (i.e., pumps closest to the design limit for flow or pressure,

diesel generator close to design required output, heat exchangers close to rated

design heat removal etc.).

11. List of available design (setup) margins in both the open and closed direction

(identify safety-related direction) for valves in the Motor-Operated Valve and

Air-Operated Valve Programs. Identify the basis for how the margin was determined.

12. List of high-risk Maintenance Rule systems/components based on engineering or

expert panel judgment (i.e., those systems/components not identified in the PSA).

13. Structures, systems, and components in the Maintenance Rule (a)(1) category for

the last 3 years.

14. Site top 10 issues list (if applicable).

15. A list of operating experience evaluations for the last 3 years.

16. Information of any common cause failure of components experienced in the last

5 years at your facility.

17. List of Root Cause Evaluations associated with component failures or design issues

initiated/completed in the last 5 years.

18. List of open operability evaluations.

19. List of components/systems considered operable but degraded/nonconforming.

20. Current management and engineering organizational chart.

21. Electronic copies of Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, Technical Specifications,

Technical Specifications Bases, and Technical Requirements Manual.

22. Major one line electrical drawings (ac and dc) and key diagrams (paper copies).

23. Electronic copy of Piping and Instrumentation Drawings (P&IDs) (if available).

II.

Information Requested (for the approximate 15 selected components) to be

Available by February 5, 2016, (will be reviewed by the team in the Regional

office during the week of February 15, 2016).

This information should be separated for each selected component, especially if

provided electronically (e.g., folder with component name that includes calculations,

condition reports, maintenance history, etc.).

1. List of condition reports (corrective action documents) associated with each of the

selected components for the last 6 years.

2. The maintenance history (corrective, preventive, and elective) associated with each

of the selected components for the last 10 years. Identify frequency of preventive

maintenance activities.

INFORMATION REQUEST FOR COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION

3

3. Copies of calculations associated with each of the selected components (if not

previously provided), excluding data files. Please review the calculations and also

provide copies of important referenced material (such as drawings, engineering

requests, and vendor letters). [Pipe stress calculations are excluded from this

request]

4. System Health Reports, System Descriptions, Design Basis Documents, and/or

Training Lesson Plans associated with each of the selected components.

5. A list of modifications, including equivalency evaluations and setpoint changes,

associated with each of the selected components. This list should include a

descriptive paragraph on the purpose of the modification. Please ensure this

list only includes design completed (not canceled) modifications.

6. Copies of operability evaluations (open/closed for last 3 years) associated with each

of the selected components and plans for restoring operability, if applicable.

7. Copies of selected operator work-around evaluations associated with each of the

selected components and plans for resolution, if applicable.

8. Copies of any open temporary modifications associated with each of the selected

components, if applicable.

9. Trend data on the selected electrical/mechanical components performance for

last 3 years (For example, pumps performance including in-service testing, other

vibration monitoring, oil sample results, etc., for valves: stroke time and leak rate

results, etc.).

10. Provide copies of the normal and abnormal operating procedures associated with the

selected components and selected scenarios.

11. A copy of any internal/external self-assessments and associated corrective action

documents generated in preparation for the inspection.

12. Copy of latest completed tests and surveillances for each component, for example:

13. Pumps: comprehensive test, quarterly test, flow balance, etc.

14. Valves: stroke time testing, diagnostic testing, leak testing, interlocks, etc.

15. Heat Exchangers/room coolers: thermal performance, clean/inspect, fan flows, etc.

16. Acceptance criteria basis calculations should also be included.

17. A copy of engineering/operations related audits completed in the last 2 years.

III.

Additional Information to be Provided on February 22, 2016, Onsite (for final

selected components)

1. During the in-office preparation activities, the team will be making final selections

and may identify additional information needed to support the inspection. The lead

inspector will provide a list of the additional information needed during the week of

February 15, 2016.

INFORMATION REQUEST FOR COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION

4

2. Schedule of any testing/maintenance activities to be conducted on the selected

components during the three onsite inspection weeks.

IV.

Information Requested to be Provided Throughout the Inspection

1. Copies of any corrective action documents generated as a result of the teams

questions or queries during this inspection.

2. Copies of the list of questions submitted by the team members and the

status/resolution of the information requested (provide daily during the inspection to

each team member).

3. One complete set of P&IDs (paper copies).

4. Reference materials. (make available if needed during all on-site weeks):

Individual Plant Examination/Probabilistic Risk Assessment Report;

Procurement documents for components selected (verify retrievable);

Plant procedures (normal, abnormal, emergency, surveillance, etc.); and

Vendor manuals.

If you have questions regarding the information requested, please contact the lead inspector.

B. Hanson

-3-

inspection in the NRCs Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records

(PARS)component of the NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System

(ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-

rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Sincerely,

/RA/

Christine A. Lipa, Chief

Engineering Branch 2

Division of Reactor Safety

Docket Nos. 50-456; 50-457

License Nos. NPF-72; NPF-77

Enclosure:

Information Request for Component Design Bases Inspection

cc w/encl: Distribution via LISTSERV

DISTRIBUTION w/encl:

Janelle Jessie

RidsNrrDorlLpl3-2 Resource

RidsNrrPMBraidwood Resource

RidsNrrDirsIrib Resource

Cynthia Pederson

Darrell Roberts

Richard Skokowski

Allan Barker

DRPIII

DRSIII

Carole Ariano

Linda Linn

Jim Clay

Carmen Olteanu

ADAMS Accession Number ML15328A502

Publicly Available

Non-Publicly Available

Sensitive

Non-Sensitive

To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the concurrence box "C" = Copy without attach/encl "E" = Copy with attach/encl "N" = No copy

OFFICE

RIII

RIII

RIII

RIII

NAME

BJose:cl

CLipa

DATE

11/24/15

11/24/15

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY