Text

Calculation PRDC-0015, Rev. 2, Addendum A01, Division 2,125 Vdc System Load Evaluation, Voltage Drop, Battery/Battery Charger Sizing Calculation
	ML15316A516
Person / Time
Site:	Perry
Issue date:	07/22/2008
From:	Chatterjee P; FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co
To:	; Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
	L-15-257 PRDC-0015, Rev 2, Add A01
	Download: ML15316A516 (29)
	v • d • e

FirstEnergy CALCULATION ADDENDUM NOP-CC-3002-02 Rev 05 CALCULATION NO PRDC-0015 INITIATING DOCUMENT CAOB-39315-2 CALCULATION REV 2

ADDENDUM NO A 01 BV1 1

D BV2 D

1 PY TITLE/SUBJECT. (MUST MATCH ORIGINAL CALCULATION TITLE (SUBJECT))

Division 2,125 VDC System Load Evaluation, Voltage Drop, Battery/Battery Charger Sizing Calculation Classification Tier 1 Calculation Safety-Related/Augmented Quality

Nonsafety-Related Open Assumptions?

Yes No If Yes, Enter Tracking Number N/A Initiating Document CA 08-39315-2 (Perry & Davis-Besse Only)

Referenced In Atlas?

I Yes No (Perry Only)

Referenced In USAR Validation Database Yes No Computer Program(S)

Program Name Version / Revision Category Status Description DCSDM 3.0 B

Active Direct Current System Database Module Originator (Pnnt, Sign & DateL^p yfy PARI

^Reviewer/Design Verifieri STEVE MORREALE /

Ugn & Date)

Approver(Print, Sign RAYTANNEY/y OBJECTIVE OR PURPOSE OF ADDENDUM:

Revise Battery Load Profile shown on Section 4.6.4 of the calculation per CA 08-39315-2.

SCOPE OF ADDENDUM:

Currently, the minimum voltage acceptance criteria in the Battery Service Tests is £ 105 volts.

105 volts is the voltage when a battery is completely discharged The minimum acceptable voltage should be equal or more than the required voltages established in calculation Division 2 battery PRDC-0015.

This Addendum establishes the load current and the minimum acceptable voltage at each step of the Service Test.

Attachment 1 shows the revised load profile.

Next revision of the calculation will perform the following:

1) Replace Section 4.6.4 with Attachment 1.

2) Add Attachment 2 & 3 as new Attachments to the calculation.

LIST NEW DOCUMENTS TO BE ADDED TO THE DOCUMENT INDEX (DIN).

No new documents are needed for the DIN.

DIN No DocumentNumber/TitleRevision,Edition,Date Reference D

Input D

Output

SUMMARY

OF RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS OF ADDENDUM:

The revised load profile is shown in Attachment 1.

There is no change or impact on battery/battery charger sizing, device voltage and overall results and conclusion of the calculation.

LIMITATIONS OR RESTRICTIONS CREATED BY ADDENDUM:

None IMPACT OF ADDENDUM ON OUTPUT DOCUMENTS:

The USAR table 8.3-7 will be revised per CA 08-39315-2.

The affected SVIs will be revised per CA 08-39315-3.

Reviewed the other two output documents PRDC-0012 and PSTG-0001 and found no impact on these documents by this Addendum DESCRIBE WHERE THE ADDENDUM WILL BE EVALUATED FOR 10CFR50 59 APPLICABILITY-See attached 10CFR50.59 Evaluation 08-02693, R/0 (RAD and Screen only).

LIST SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: (Include total number of pages)

, Dies*r* pages, DVR 1 Page, Calc Review Checklist 3 pages, 10CFR50 59 Documentation "7 pages.

FirstEnetxw CALCULATION ADDENDUM NOP-CC-3002-02 Rev 05 CALCULATION NO. PRDC-0015 INITIATING DOCUMENT CA 08-39315-2 CALCULATION REV 2

ADDENDUM NO A 01 LIST ATTACHMENTS: (Include total number of pages) -1 Page -1 Page -2 Pages

Attachment 1 to PRDC-0015. R/2. API 4 6 4 USAR TABLE 8.3.7 LOAD PROFILE USAR Table 8.3-7 provides the DC load profile for Division 2 battery for the design basis accident scenario.

Service tests (per SVIs) for the batteries are performed utilizing the load profile from Table 8.3-7.

The Battery load profile in this Addendum has both the current and the voltage information and is shown in Attachment 2 of this Addendum.

The voltage and current at different nodes is obtained from Attachment F and G respectively of the calculation.

These currents and voltages were increased to account for measuring instrument error of 0 5 volts [Typical Fluke Model 77 error is +/-(0.3% of Reading +

1 LSD)] for this load profile The load profile below is per IEEE Std. 450-1995, Paragraph 6.6 for Service Tests which states that the test should not be corrected for temperature or age, if the battery was sized in accordance with IEEE Std 485-1983 that already accounts for margin for age and temperature.

The batteries are sized per above referenced IEEE Std. for discharge voltage of 105 volts in this calculation.

To support this load profile, the battery sizing was recalculated per above IEEE Std. for discharge voltage of 1.92 volts/cell (115.2 battery volts) accounting for aging and temperature correction and found to have adequate margin. shows the battery sizing worksheet for Division 2 battery using the 1.92 volts per cell discharge curve.

The revised load profile is as follows:

Period 1

is - 0 to 1min ->> Duration 1 min ->> 210 amp and voltage is & 118.2 volts Period 2 is -1 to 2 min -Duration 1 min ->> 105 amp and voltage is s 120 volts Period 3 is - 2 to 3 min ->> Duration 1 min -125 amp and voltage is > 120 volts Period 3 is - 3 to 10 min -Duration 7 min -105 amp and voltage is s 120 volts Period 4 is-10 to 11 min -* Duration 1 min->> 125 amp and voltage is s 119.5 volts Period 5 is -11 to 119 min ->> Duration 108 min ->> 105 amp and voltage is £ 119 5 volts Period 7 is -119 to 120 min ->> Duration 1 mm -125 amp and voltage is s 119 volts Pg 1 of 1

Division 2 Battery Load Profile for SVI to PRDC-0015, R/2, Addendum A 01 Time From 0 Sec 3 Sec 5 Sec 10 Sec 11 Sec 12 Sec 15 Sec 16 Sec 17 Sec 20 Sec 30 Sec 31 Sec 32 Sec 35 Sec 36 Sec 1

Min 2 Min 40 Sec 2 Min 41 Sec 1

2 Min 42 Sec 2 Min 45 Sec 10 Min 10 Min 1 Sec 10 Min 2 Sec 11 Min 1 Hr VHr59MTn 1 Hr 59 Min 1 Sec 1 Hr 59 Min 2 Sec Time To 3 Sec 5 Sec 10 Sec 11 Sec 12 Sec 15 Sec 16 SEC 17 Sec 20 Sec 30 SEC 31 Sec 32 Sec 35 Sec 36 Sec 1 Min 2 Mm 40 Sec 2 Min 41 Sec 2 Mm 42 Sec 2 Mm 45 Sec 10_Min 10 Mini Sec 1

10 Mm 2 Sec 11 Min 1

Hr 1 Hr 59 Min

1 Hr59~Mi~n 1 Sec" 1

Hr 59 Min 2 Sec 2Hrs Time Step 1

2 3

4 5

6 7

8 9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2CT 21 22 23

" 24

- j 25 26 27 28 Current 141.07 2014 104.66 104.54 125 23 133 48 117.46 120 55 1128 100 58 105.72 120 59 112.84 100.62 99 91 99.36 104.08 120.32 112 12 99.36 104.14 120.33 112.21

~99.42" 99 53 108.97 120 41 112.52 Voltage 117.669 117.669 117.669 117 669 117.669 117.669 117 669 117.669 117 669 117.669 117.669 117 669 117.669 117.669 117.669 119.24 119.24 119.24 119.24 119.24 118.957 118.957 118.957 118.999 118.509 118.056 118 056 118 056 SVI Time 0 to 1 Min 1 to 2 Min 2 to 3 Min 3 to 10 Min 10 to 11 Min 11 Min to 119 Min 119 Min to 120 Min i

SVI j

SVI Current l

Voltage i

210 j

118.2 I

I I--

105 l"

120 125 120 105 120 125 119.5 i

j.

105 l

119.5 125 119 Pg 1 of 1

Sizing of Division 2 Battery for 1.92 Volts per cell to PRDC-0015 R/2. Addendum 01 Period

[1]

Load (An? ueres)

[2]

Change in Load (Ampe 13]

Duration of Period (minute)

[4]

Time to end of Section (minute)

[5]

Section 1

- First Period Only -

If A2 is greater than A1, go to Section 2.

1 A1 =

210 A1 -0 =

210 M1 =

1 Section 3 - First Three Periods Only - If A4 is greater than A3,

(

1 2

3 A1 =

A2 =

A3 =

210 105 125 A1 -0 =

A2-A1 =

A3-A2=

210

-105 20 M1 =

M2 =

M3 =

1 1

1 T = M1 =

1 I

30 to Section 4.

T=M1+M2+M3=

T=M2+M3 =

3 2

T=M3=

1 Capacity at TMinRate Amp/Pol J6]

60 Sec 1

Total 59.5 60 60 Required Section Size (Col 3 / Cot 6)

Pos Values

[71 3.50 Neg Value B

[71 3.53 0 33

-1.75 Total =

3.86

-1.75 Sub Total =

2.11 Section 5 - First Five Periods Only -

If A6 is greater than A5, go to Section 6 1

2 3

4 5

A1

=

210 A2 =

105 A3 =

A4 =

A5 =

125 105 125 A1-0=

210 A2-A1=

-105 A3-A2=

20 A4-A3=

A5-A4=

-20 20 M1

=

1 M2 =

1 M3=

1 M4=

,7 M5=

1 T=M1+

M5=

11 T=M2

.M5=

10 T=M3 + M4+M5>9 T=M4+M5=

8 T=M5=

1 57 57 58 58 60 Total =

Sub Total =

Section 6 - First Six Periods Only -

If A7 is greater than A6, go to Section 7 1

2 3

4 5

6 A1 =

210 A2 =

A3 =

A4 =

A5 =

A6 =

105 125 105 125 105 A1-0=

210 A2-A1=

-105 A3-A2=

20 A4-A3=

-20 A5-A4=

A6-A5=

20

-20 M1 =

M2 =

1 1

M3=

1 M4=

7 M5=

1 M6=

108 T=M1+

.M6=

119 T=M2 M6=

. 118 T=M3

+M6=

117 T=M4 M6=

116 T=M5 M6=

109 T=M6=

108 3 68 0 34 0.33 4 36 "2.18 36 36 37 37 40 39 i

Total =

i Sub Total =

Section 7 - First Seven Penods Only - If A8 is greater than A7, go to Section 8.

1 2

3 4

5 6

7

A1 =

A2 =

A3 =

A4 =

A5 =

A6 =

A7 =

210 105 125 105 125 105 125 1

Allow Thee TheC to sup The worksh 1.92x60=11!

Aama Factor Temperature ng 1 25 a orrected r

ivision 2 iport 1 92 A1 -0 =

A2-A1 =

A3-A2=

A4-A3=

A5-A4=

A6-A5=

A7-A6=

s Aging Fa lumber of battery has x 60 cell =

eet is created to s 5.2 volts accounti

- Per IEEE Std 485-Correction Factor -

temperature equal or greater than IEEE Std 485-1977, Section 6 2 1

Preparation of the above Batterv 210

-105 20

-20 20

-20 20 ctor and 1

0 positive plat 7 positive 115 2 volts M1 =

M2 =

M3 =

M4 =

M5 =

M6 =

M7 =

34 as Bsare plates 1

1 1

7 1

108 1

Cell Terr

=

1 25 x and it re T=M1+

.M7=

120 T=M2...M7=

119 T=M3...+M7=

118 T=M4...M7=

117 T=M5...M7=

110 T=M6+M7=

109 T=M7=

1 iperalure Correctior 1 034 x 3 5 =

quires 4.52 >> 5 Th f

36 36 36 37 40 40 60 Total =

i Factor erefore. the Divi!

Sub Total

=

4.S2 sion 2 battery is i 5 83 054 0 50 6.87 2.90 I

-1.84

-0 34

-2 19

-2 92

-0 54

-0 51

-3 97 j

5 83 0.56 0.50 0.33 7 22 3.27 idequately size

-2 92

-0 54

-0.50

-3 96 d

support that Division 2 battery when completely discharged can support more than ng for an aging and temperature correction factor. Discharge curve S-1051 was used.

1977, Section 6.2.3, 25% aging factor has been used for battery sizing Technical Specification Surveillance Requirements SR 3 8 6 3 requires verifying battery cell electrolyte 72 degree F Adding conservatism, temperature correction factor of 1 034 for 71 degree F per Table 1 of has been used for battery sizing Sizing. Worksheets (Ref. Section 6.3 of IEEE Std 485-1977):

Pg 1 of 2

Sizing of Division 2 Battery for 1.92 Volte per cell to PRDC-0015 R/2, Addendum 01 Column 1.

Lists the time periods of the battery load cycle.

Column 2.

Lists the battery load current dunng the periods in Column 1

Column 3 Calculate and record the changes in load currents between different periods Also, record if the changes are positive or negative Column 4 Records the duration of penods in minutes Column 5.

Calculates and records the times from the start of each period to the end of section Column 6 From the S-1051 curve (Attachment 27 of TAF 81793) find the intersection of time in column 5 and the 1 92 cell voltage discharge curve Record the amperes per positive plate from the X-axis Column 7.

Calculate the number of positive plates (positive or negative values) by dividing Column 3 with Column 6 Pg 2 of 2

FirstEn&xjy DESIGN INTERFACE

SUMMARY

- PY

^1 °f 1 NOP-CC-2004-06 Rev. 15 l

DIS Rev ° Document/Activity Evaluated:

Calculation PRDC-0015, R/2, Addendum A 01 l

Rev.

0 PROGRAMS and PROCEDURES INTERFACES Req'd 0

IS El El Sect N/A N/A Topic j

Prepare DIE and forward to Maintenance Procedures DIE No Work Planning Unit, SMS 01 Operations Procedures (3*<<-

<.'<<.o~*s}

l Operations Procedures Unit l

N/A i

Systems Programs & Procedures

~~l Responsible Plant Engineer T

02 N/A 35 0 Engineering Assessment Board Training

~C*S<< <<-

CL<<u<<*.>>In)

] EAB Chairman i

03 Nuclear Training Services, PTS DESIGN INTERFACES Potential Interface Evaluated using DIRC (NOP-CC-2004-03) Rev 13 D

n

n n

D n

n

1 0

20 30 30 4.0 50 60 ALARA Fire Protection/Safe Shutdown Equipment Qualification (3 1-3 10)

Mechanical/Structural Engineering Unit, DES Electrical/l&C Engineering Unit, DES Engineering Programs Unit, TSES Equipment Qualification (3 5, 3 7, 3 11, 3.12)

\\

Mechanical/Structural Engineering Unit, DES Human Factors Plant Security System Seismic 7.0 Pipe Rupture 80 90 100 11 0

11 0

120 130 14 0 150 160 170 180 180 190 20.0 21 0 Internal Missile Hazards NSSS Design Basis Containment Vessel and Drywell Isolation Materials Compatibility/Chemical Control (11.1-11 10.11 14,11 15)

Materials Compatibility/Chemical Control (11.11-11 13)

Control Room Habitability Mechanical Systems Penetrations Miscellaneous Structural Considerations Heavy Loads Electncal Systems

(,

C<<. -*- *** * ~ J

s Instrumentation and Controls Instrumentation and Controls (18 8)

Simulator In-Service Inspection (ISI)

Piping and Pipe Supports D

22 0 J

Hydrogen Control

n

D

n

n n

n E)

n n

D 23 0 Lubricants 24 0 25 0 26 0 26.0 26 0 26 0 26.0 j 27 0 28.0 29 0 30 0 30 0 31 0 3~1 0 32 0 33 0 34 0 36.0 37 0 38.0 Probabilistic Safety Assessment Plant Characteristic Parameters & Setpoints Assumed in USAR Chapter 15 Transient, LOCA & Reload Core Analysis Electrical/l&C Engineering Unit, DES Electrical/l&C Engineering Unit, DES Mechanical/Structural Engineering Unit, DES Engineering Analysis Unit, DES Engineering Analysis Unit, DES Mechanical/Structural Engineering Unit, DES Engineering Analysis Unit, DES Mechanical/Structural Engineering Unit, DES Engineering Analysis Unit, DES Engineering Analysis Unit, DES Mechanical/Structural Engineering Unit, DES Mechanical/Structural Engineering Unit, DES Mechanical/Structural Engineering Unit, DES Mechanical/Structural Engineering Unit, DES Electrical/l&C Engineering Unit, DES Electrical/l&C Engineering Unit, DES Electrical/l&C Systems Engineering Unit, PEERS Operator Training Unit, PTS Engineering Programs Unit, TSES I

Mechanical/Structural Engineering Unit, DES Engineering Analysis Unit, DES I

Mechanical/Structural Engineering Unit, DES I

Engineering Analysis Unit, DES J~

Reactor Engineering, OPS Engineering Analysis Unit, DES i

Motor Operated Valves ( 26 1 - 26 6)

I Engineering Programs Unit, TSES Motor Operated Valves (26 1

- 26 3)

Electrical/l&C Engineering Unit, DES Motor Operated Valves (26 4 and 26 5)

Motor Operated Valves (26 7 and 26 8)

Motor Operated Valves (26 9 - 26 13)

Plant Computers/Software Maintenance Rule, 10CFR 50 65 Piping & Equipment Predictive Maintenance Predictive Maintenance (30.8)

Operations Impact (31 1 - 31 3)

Operations Impact (31 4)

Maintenance Design Basis Information Mechanical/Structural Engineering Unit, DES Engineering Analysis Unit, DES Mechanical/Structural Engineering Unit, DES Electrical/l&C Systems Engineering Unit, PEERS Engineering Programs Unit, TSES Mechanical/Structural Engineering Unit, DES Work Planning Unit, PMS Mechanical/Structural Engineering Unit, DES Plant Operations Section Engineering Analysis Unit, DES Work Planning Unit, SMS Configuration Control Unit, DES 04 Reactivity Impact i

Reactor Engineering, OPS Environmental Chemistry Services, OPS Personal Safety Considerations Industrial Safety, OPS Emergency Response I

Emerqencv Response Section Comments. This Addendum revises battery load profile for USAR Table 8 3-7 Discussed the change with the Operator Procedure personnel and it was agreed that no Operator Personnel DIE is necessary Review of Potential Interface using DIRC (NOP-CC-2004-03) Rev 13 indicates that no DIE from Tra ning is necessary or required for this activity The calculation is prepared by Electrical personnel and question on Electrical System question in Item 17 has been considered and addressed in the calculation In summary, none of the above disciplines except Design Basis Information requires a design interface for this addendum

><fI/'./Cw <<*">

l/y//°r>

Prepared by.

(Print Namptfpefoign) /fs*

Da}P

/

-?

l Reviewed by:

(Print Name and Sign)-^^

Page 1 of 2 DESIGN INTERFACE EVALUATION NOP-CC-2004-07 Rev. 03 Document/Activity Addendum A 01 to Calculation PRDC-0015 To: Interfacing Organization (As identified on DIS)

Maintenance Procedures From:

(Design Engineer)

Pad Chatterjee Description of Change/Areas of Concern Table 8.3-7 revision and its impact on the SVI testing.

Rev.

2 DIE No./Rev.

01/0 Contact Bob swartz/Tim Sanford Mail Zone A160 Phone 5209 DIE Response Date 6/19/08 List DIRC Questions N/A To be completed by the Interface Evaluator.

Refer to NOP-CC-2004, Section 4.2.1 and Attachment 2 for guidance.

IMPACT ON DESIGN AND LICENSING BASIS Describe affect on current licensing basis for the system/structure/component (SSC) involved.

Reviewed for impact to Maintenance Procedures only.

Describe affect of proposed change on existing design basis.

Reviewed for impact to Maintenance Procedures only.

Identify relevant design criteria and standards (including applicable revision/addenda).

Reviewed for impact to Maintenance Procedures only.

Identify potential failure mechanisms and failure consequences.

Reviewed for impact to Maintenance Procedures only.

Describe impact on operational configuration, system interactions, and any other pertinent considerations.

Identify required actions.

Reviewed for impact to Maintenance Procedures only.

INSTALLATION AND TESTING Identify appropriate installation requirements and acceptance criteria for testing.

Reviewed for impact to Maintenance Procedures only.

See Comments below.

Identify any limitations such as open assumptions or engineering holds.

Identify what is restrained and what is required to release the hold.

Reviewed for impact to Maintenance Procedures only.

See Comments below.

IMPACT ON TRAINING Does the change add, modify, or delete equipment, components, systems, or processes that result in the need for personnel to acquire additional skills and knowledge?;^ No D

Yes If Yes, complete the Affected Documents section below.

Identify Training as the Document Type, assign an Action Code, Responsible Organization and Tracking Number.

NA all other fields.

COMMENTS/ADDITIONAL INPUT/ INFORMATION Calculation is applicable to Division 2 Batteries for Unit 1 and Unit 2.

Currently, the following surveillances are on HOLD:

SVI-R42-T5212, Service Test of Battery Capacity Division 2 (Unit 1)

SVI-R42-T5214, Service Test of Battery Capacity Division 2 (Unit 2)

This calculation revision is needed to make the required changes to the affected surveillances and release from on HOLD status.

FirstEn&gy Page 2 of 2 DESIGN INTERFACE EVALUATION NOP-CC-2004-07 Rev. 03 Docu ment/Activity Addendum A 01 to Calculation PRDC-0015 Rev.

2 DIE No./Rev.

01/0 AFFECTED DOCUMENTS List new and/or existing documents requiring issue/update as a result of this activity (e.g., drawings, procedures, databases, lesson plans, and vendor manuals).

List current revision/version of the document Document Type SVI SVI Document SVI-R42-T5212 SVI-R42-T5214 Unit 1

2 Rev.

8 7

Version Action Code*

Responsible Organization WPSU WPSU Tracking No.**

600463268 600463268

Action Completion Code:

1 Document must be issued/effective at implementation of the activity prior to retuming the SSC to service (Operational Acceptance).

2 Document must be issued/effective following issuance of the package, but prior to implementation.

3 Document must be issued/effective upon issuance of the package for implementation.

4 Document must be issued/effective following return of the SSC to service (Operational Acceptance) and prior to cioseout of the activity.

5 Document needs to be changed as a result of the activity, but the change can be done when the responsible organization deems appropriate.

- A tracking number is required for these actions.

CONCLUSION D

Interface Not Required (Provide Justification)

TInterface Provided (Indicate if Final Review requ>e8P D Final Review required Interface Evaluator (Print Name and Sign)

Tim Sanford Approval (Print Name and Sign)

Not Required Date None D

Comments need to be resolved D

My comments/input have been property incorporated and/or addressed.

Interface Evaluator Interface Evaluator Date Date

FirstEnercw Page 1 of 2 DESIGN INTERFACE EVALUATION NOP-CC-2004-07 Rev 03 Document/Activity Addendum A 01 to Calculation PRDC-0015 To: Interfacing Organization (As identified on DIS)

Systems Programs & Procedures From:

(Design Engineer)

Pan Chatterjee Description of Change/Areas of Concern Table 8.3-7 revision and its impact on the SVI testing.

Rev.

2 DIE No./Rev.

02/0 Contact Bill Slack Mail Zone A160 Phone 5209 DIE Response Date 6/19/08 List DIRC Questions N/A To be completed by the Interface Evaluator.

Refer to NOP-CC-2004, Section 4.2.1 and Attachment 2 for guidance.

IMPACT ON DESIGN AND LICENSING BASIS Describe affect on current licensing basis for the system/structure/component (SSC) involved Not applicable to the scope of this review Describe affect of proposed change on existing design basis.

Not applicable to the scope of this review Identify relevant design criteria and standards (including applicable revision/addenda)

Not applicable to the scope of this review.

Identify potential failure mechanisms and failure consequences Not applicable to the scope of this review Describe impact on operational configuration, system interactions, and any other pertinent considerations.

Identify required actions.

Addendum A01 to calculationPRDC-0015 changes the Division 2 battery load profile to provide a separate acceptance criterion for each load step. The acceptance cnteria are changed to reflect the actual required battery terminal voltages required to support system loads.

This calculation addendum results in no physical changes to the DC system thus there is no impact upon system operation or configuration. Due to the more exacting acceptance criteria being imposed, Service Test requirements will be more exacting This will require a Service Test procedure revision, which will be addressed by the Maintenance Section's DIE.

INSTALLATION AND TESTING Identify appropriate installation requirements and acceptance criteria for testing.

The change being evaluated is a calculation addendum Nothing is being installed No testing requirements are applicable.

Identify any limitations such as open assumptions or engineering holds Identify what is restrained and what is required to release the hold Not applicable to the scope of this review IMPACT ON TRAINING Does the change add, modify, or delete equipment, components, systems, or processes that result in the need for personnel to acquire additional skills and knowledge? ^

No

Yes If Yes, complete the Affected Documents section below.

Identify Training as the Document Type, assign an Action Code, Responsible Organization and Tracking Number NA all other fields.

COMMENTS/ADDITIONAL INPUT/ INFORMATION No documents under the control of PERE are affected by this calculation addendum AFFECTED DOCUMENTS List new and/or existing documents requiring issue/update as a result of this activity (e.g., drawings, procedures, databases, lesson plans, and vendor manuals).

List current revision/version of the document Document Type Document Unit Rev Version Action Code*

Responsible Organization Tracking No."

Action Completion Code-1 Document must be issued/effective at implementation of the activity prior to returning the SSC to service (Operational Acceptance).

2 Document must be issued/effective following issuance of the package, but prior to implementation.

3 Document must be issued/effective upon issuance of the package for implementation 4

Document must be issued/effective following return of the SSC to service (Operational Acceptance) and prior to closeout of the activity.

5 Document needs to be changed as a result of the activity, but the change can be done wnen the responsible organization deems appropriate.

- A tracking number is required for these actions.

conclusion D

Interface Not Required (Provide Justification)

£3 Interface Provided (Indicate if Final Review required Interface Evaluajgr (Pnnt Name and Sign)

William Slack tyc/A/iLw<~~ Jjfa&t^*-

Date 6/18/08 Final Review required

//

Approval (Print Name and Sign)

//

Da>e FINAL REVIEW

FirstEnerav DESIGN INTERFACE EVALUATION NOP-CC-2004-07 Rev 03 Document/Activity Addendum A 01 to Calculation PRDC-0015 G

Comments need to be resolved G

My comments/input have been properly incorporated and/or addressed.

Rev.

2 Page 2 of 2 DIE No./Rev.

02/0 Interface Evaluator Interface Evaluator Date Date

-i

-~~.

-'~>>

j Page 1

of 1

uv t

NOP-CC-2004-07 Rev 03 Document/Activity - 1) Calculation PRDC-0014, R/3

2) Calculation PRDC-0015, R/2, A 01

) Calculation PRDC-0016, R/3, A 01

4) USAR Change Notice 08-093 Rev.

N/A DIE No./Rev.

JB'/O To:

Interfacing Organization

{As identified on DIS)

LAB from (Design Engineer)

Description of Change/Areas of Concern Review of the above documents Contact J

Lori_McGuire_

]

Mail Zone I A160 l

List DIRC Questions N/A IPhone 5209_ _

DIE Response Date To be completed bylhe !nterfaciajEv?luator, Refer to NQP-CC-2004, Section 4.2.1 and Attachment 2 forgiiidance.

IV1PACT ON DESIGN AND LICENSING BASIS Describe affect on current licensing basis for the system/structure/component (SSC) involved Describe affect of proposed change on existing design basis.

Identify relevant design criteria and standards (including applicable revision/addenda).

Identify potential failure mechanisms and failure consequences Describe impact on operational configuration, system interactions, and any other pertinent considerations Identify required actions INSTALLATION AND TESTING Identify appropriate installation requirements and acceptance criteria for testing Identify any limitations such as open assumptions or engineering holds.

Identify what is restrained and what is required to release the hold IVIPACT ON TRAINING Does the change add, modify, or delete equipment, components, systems, or processes that result in the need for personnel to acquire additional skills and knowledge?

No D

Yes If Yes, complete the Affected Documents section below Identify Training as the Document Type, assign an Action Code.

Responsible Organization and Tracking Number NA all other fields COMMENTS/ADDITIONAL INPUT/ INFORMATION EAB does not perform an interface per NOBP-CC-2005.

However, the DIE is used to determine if final EAB review is needed Final rjview of PRDC-14, 15, and 16 is requested.

N/A AFFECTED DOCUMENTS I ist new and/or existing documents requiring issue/update as a result of this activity (e.g

, drawings, procedures, databases, lesson plans, nd vendor manuals).

List current revision/version of the document Document Type Document Unit Rev Version Action Code*

Responsible Organization Tracking No **

"Vclion Completion Code Document must be issued/effective at implementation of the activity prior to returning the SSC to service (Operational Acceptance)

Document must be issued/effective following issuance of the package, but prior to implementation Document must be issued/effective upon issuance of the package for implementation Document must be issued/effective following return of the SSC to service (Operational Acceptance) and prior to closeout of the activity.

Document needs to be changed as a result of the activity, but the change can be done when the responsible organization deems appropriate.

- A tracking number is required for these actions D

Interface Not Required (Provide Justification)

D Interface Provided (Indicate if Final Review required Final Review required Interface Evaluator (Prifrt Nam$,and Sign)

LoriMcGuire

><^-?*>>*!<

Approval (Print Name and Sign)

N/A Date Comments need to be resolved G

My comments/input have been properly incorporated and/or addressed I

Interface Evaluator 1

Interface Evaluator Date "bate" l_

ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT BOARD (EAB)

ENGINEERING PRODUCT ASSESSMENT Form NOBP-CC-2005-01 Rev. 01 Product Type Calc Product No PRDC-15Rev2 A01 Si te BV DB X

PY

Title:

Div 2 load profile change Responsible Engineer Pari Chatterjee Section/Unit DES/Elect EAB Members:

Lori McGuire Technical Attribute A.

Procedural Compliance / Implementation - Format and content described in a logical sequence, general ownership of product, attention to detail, etc.

B.

Rigor in Problem Solving - Rigorous approach to problem solving, correct solution, basis explained, conclusions validated, adequate oversight, etc C.

Licensing Basis Maintenance - Knowledge of licensing basis conveyed and communicated, 10CFR50.59 adequacy, USAR changes captured, etc.

D.

Design Basis Maintenance - Knowledge of design basis conveyed and communicated, margins understood and maintained, impact on design basis documentation addressed, etc.

E.

Analysis / Evaluation / Design - Free of errors, complete, in accordance with methodology with appropriate assumptions, limitations and conclusions, appropriate standards applied, etc.

F.

Team Approach - Participation of interfacing / affected disciplines and plant groups participation, testing and installation considered, operations impact considered, installation interface considered, etc.

Overall Assessment - Highest score for any of the six Technical Attributes Grade 0

0 0

0 1

Reference NOBP-CC-2005 Attachments 1 and 2 for guidance in completing this form.

0 No comment, product is acceptable as presented with only minor editorial comments 1

Omission or error has negligible effect on results.

Item can be resolved by additional clarification or documented engineering judgment 2

Omission or error has minor effect but requires revision of document to support results or conclusion.

3 Significant effect on results or status of item indeterminate until additional information is provided.

4 Attribute unsatisfactory.

Summary / Comments:

The load profile change is consistent with Att F and G of the base calc.

See attached for detailed comments.

0 Additional Comments Attached Disposition:

D Acceptable

Minor corrections needed; no EAB re-review M

Resolve and Return to EAB

EAB comments on PRDC-15 Rev 3 Addendum 1:

1.

The USAR Validation Database block on the coversheet needs to be filled in on both PRDC-15 and PRDC16.(A)

Response

Corrected.

2.

Provide a conclusion in the Summary section on the coversheet instead of referencing the attachment.

(A)

Response

A conclusion summary has been added.

3. section 5, the Positive Values column 7 is not added correctly.

Also, shouldn't the positive values be in the positive value column and the negative values be in the negative values column?

Some of the positive values are listed in the negative column 7 throughout the attachment. (E)

Response: Corrected Attachment 3 as discussed above.

4.

Column 5 for Section 5 is not accurate with respect to the T=M...

labels.

The current labels don't match the listed values and they are not consistent with the other section labeling. (E)

Response

Corrected Attachment 3 as discussed above.

5.

In the notes for Attachment 3, "record" is mis-spelled in 2 places.

Also, on the note for column 6, the value should be 1.92 not 1.75.

(E)

Response

Corrected.

6.

It would seem appropriate to also reflect the revised load profile in base calc sections 4.6.1 and 4.6.4.

(E)

Response

Section 4.6.1 represents the actual load profile from Attachment F and G of the calculation.

Section 4.6.4 load profile will be added in the USAR Table 8.3-7.

Therefore, the values have been slightly increased to avoid USAR revision due to slight change in load during future calculation revision.

Because Table 8.3-7 Table load profile will also be used in SVI, slightly higher values will also account for measuring instrument error.

7.

Attachment 1 period 1, correct the spelling of volts. (E)

Response

Corrected

firstEhergv Page 1

of 2 DESIGN INTERFACE EVALUATION NOP-CC-2004-07 Rev 03 Document/Activity Addendum A 01 to Calculation PRDC-0015 To: Interfacing Organization (As identified on DIS)

Design Basis Information From:

(Design Engineer)

Pari Chatterjee Description of Change/Areas of Concern Impact R42 system Design Basis Rev.

2 DIE No/Rev.

04/0 Contact Vic Colacicco Mail Zone A160 Phone 5209 DIE Response Date 7/3/08 List DIRC Questions 33 To be completed by the Interface Evaluator.

Refer to NOP-CC-2004, Section 4.2.1 and Attachment 2 for guidance.

IMPACT ON DESIGN AND LICENSING BASIS Describe affect on current licensing basis for the system/structure/component (SSC) involved.

None with respect to ATLAS. The change in Division 2, 125 VDC System Load Evaluation, Voltage Drop, Battery/Battery Charger Sizing Calculation does not change the ability of the Div 1 DC system to perform its design function.

Describe affect of proposed change on existing design basis None with respect to ATLAS. The change in Division 2, 125 VDC System Load Evaluation, Voltage Drop, Battery/Battery Charger Sizing Calculation does not change the ability of the Div 1 DC system to perform its design function.

Identify relevant design criteria and standards (including applicable revision/addenda).

22A2722 Plant DC Power, Specification Identify potential failure mechanisms and failure consequences None with respect to ATLAS Describe impact on operational configuration, system interactions, and any other pertinent considerations Identify required actions.

None with respect to ATLAS INSTALLATION AND TESTING Identify appropriate installation requirements and acceptance criteria for testing.

None with respect to ATLAS Identify any limitations such as open assumptions or engineering holds Identify what is restrained and what is required to release the hold None with respect to ATLAS IMPACT ON TRAINING Does the change add, modify, or delete equipment, components, systems, or processes that result in the need for personnel to acquire additional skills and knowledge?

E3 No

Yes If Yes, complete the Affected Documents section below.

Identify Training as the Document Type, assign an Action Code, Responsible Organization and Tracking Number.

NA all other fields.

COMMENTS/ADDITIONAL INPUT/ INFORMATION None AFFECTED DOCUMENTS List new and/or existing documents requiring issue/update as a result of this activity (e g., drawings, procedures, databases, lesson plans, and vendor manuals)

List current revision/version of the document Document Type N/A Document N/A Unit N/A Rev N/A Version N/A Action Code*

N/A Responsible Organization N/A Tracking No **

N/A

'Action Completion Code 1

Document must be issued/effective at implementation of the activity prior to returning the SSC to service (Operational Acceptance).

2 Document must be issued/effective following issuance of the package, but prior to implementation 3

Document must be issued/effective upon issuance of the package for implementation 4

Document must be issued/effective following return of the SSC to service (Operational Acceptance) and prior to closeout of the activity 5

Document needs to be changed as a result of the activity, but the change can be done when the responsible organization deems appropriate

- A tracking number is required for these actions.

FirstEnerav DESIGN INTERFACE EVALUATION NOP-CC-2004-07 Rev. 03 Document/Activity Addendum A 01 to Calculation PRDC-0015 Rev.

2 Page 2 of 2 DIE No./Rev.

04/0 CONCLUSION O

Interface Not Required (Provide Justification)

Interface Provided (Indicate if Final Review required)

Interface Evaluator (Prpt tyame i

Victor Colacicco i D Final Review required j

Approval (Pnn John Maloney \\

\\J n

Comments need to be resolved My comments/input have been properly incorporated addressed.

FINAL F and/or Interface Evaluator Interface Evaluator Date Date

DESIGN VERIFICATION RECORD Page 1

of 1 NOP-CC-2001-01 Rev. 00 SECTION I:

TO BE COMPLETED BY DESIGN ORIGINATOR DOCUMENT(S)/ACTIVITYTO BE VERIFIED:

PRDC-0015, Rev. 2, Addendum 1

SAFETY RELATED AUGMENTED QUALITY

NONSAFETY RELATED SUPPORTING/REFERENCE DOCUMENTS CR 08-39315 DESIGN ORIGINATOR.

(Print ai Pari Chatterjee

\\m6 DATE 6/17/08 SECTION II:

TO BE COMPLETED BY VERIFIER VERIFICATION METHOD (Check one)

M DESIGN REVIEW (Complete Design Review Checklist or Calculation Review Checklist)

ALTERNATE CALCULATION QUALIFICATION TESTING JUSTIFICATION FOR SUPERVISOR PERFORMING VERIFICATION:

N/A APPROVAL:

(Print and Sign Name)

N/A DATE EXTENT OF VERIFICATION:

Verified that the correct Load Profile and Battery Voltage data was extracted from the calculation for incorporation into USAR, Table 8.3-7 and the applicable battery Surveillance Tests.

Verified that the specified SVI Current and Voltage limits are consistent with the calculated values and provide sufficient margin to account for measuring and testing inaccuracies.

Calculated battery Current and Voltage values were accurately identified and documented in Attachment 2 of this addendum for all Time Steps in the 2-hour, Div 2 Battery Duty Cycle.

SVI Current values are conservative with respect to calculated battery current and sufficient margin is provided to account for measunng inaccuracies.

COMMENTS, ERRORS OR DEFICIENCIES IDENTIFIED?

El YES

NO The margin between SVI Battery Voltage limits and Calculated Battery Voltage values does not seem be sufficient to account for measuring inaccuracies (typically 1 % measuring error is considered in determining test values).

RESOLUTION. (For Alternate Calculation or Qualification Testing only)

Measuring instrument error has been added in the load profile.

RESOLVED BY: (Pnnt and Si Pari Chatterjee DAT VERIFIER: (Pnnt and Sign A/ame, Stephen P. Morreale APPROVED BY:

(Pnnt Ray Tanney DATE

RrstEnemv CALCULATION REVIEW CHECKLIST NOP-CC-2001-04 Rev. 05 QUESTION General 1

Does the stated objective/purpose clearly describe why the calculation is being performed?

2.

Are design input / output documents and references listed and clearly identified in the document index, including edition and addenda, where applicable?

3.

Were verbal inputs from third parties properly documented

4.

Are design input parameters, such as physical and geometric characteristic and regulatory or code and standard requirements, accurately taken from the design input documents and correctly incorporated, including tolerances and units?

5.

Are the design inputs relevant, current, consistent with design/licensing bases and directly applicable to the purpose of the calculation, including appropriate tolerances and ranges/modes of operation?

6.

Are all design inputs retrievable?

If not, have they been added as attachments?

7.

Are preliminary or conceptual inputs clearly identified for later confirmation as open assumptions?

8.

Where applicable, were construction and operating considerations included as input information?

9.

Were design input / output documents properly updated to reference this calculation?

Assumptions 10 Have the assumptions necessary to perform the analysis been clearly identified and adequately described?

11.

Are all assumptions for the calculation reasonable and consistent with design/licensing bases?

12.

Have all open assumptions needing later confirmation been clearly identified on the Calculation cover sheet, including when the open assumption needs to be closed?

13.

Has an SAP Activity Initiation Form been created for open assumptions?

14 Have engineering judgments been clearly identified?

15.

Are engineering judgments reasonable and adequately documented?

16.

Is suitable justification provided for all assumptions/engineering judgements (except those based upon recognized engineering practice, physical constants or elementary scientific principles)

Method of Analysis 17.

Is the method used appropriate considering the purpose and type of calculation?

18.

Is the method in accordance with applicable codes, standards, and design/licensing bases?

Identification of Computer Codes (Ref NOP-SS-1001) 19.

Have the versions of the computer codes employed in the design analysis been certified for this application?

20 Are codes properly identified along with source (vendor, organization, etc.)?

NA X

X X

Yes X

X X

No CALCU REV.

1 ADDEN UNIT COMMENTS This Addendum identifies values from Revision 2 of the Calculation for use in defining a revised battery load profile that will be incorporated into the USAR and Battery Service Test Voltage limits.

Page 1

of 3 LATIONNO.

PRDC-0015 DUM NO. 01 RESOLUTION

FwstEnemv CALCULATION REVIEW CHECKLIST NOP-CC-2001-04 Rev 05 QUESTION 21.

Is the code applicable for the analysis being performed?

22.

Is the computer program(s) being used listed on the FENOC Usable Software List for the site?

23.

Does the computer model, that has been created, adequately reflect actual (or to be modified) plant conditions (e.g., dimensional accuracy, type of model/code options used, time steps, etc.)?

24.

Did the computer output generate any ERROR or WARNING Messages that could invalidate the results?

25.

Is the computer output reasonable when compared to inputs and what was expected?

Computations 26 Are the equations used consistent with recognized engineering practice and design/licensing bases?

27.

Is there a reasonable justification provided for the uses of any equations not in common use?

28.

Were the mathematical operations performed properly and the results accurate?

29.

Have adjustment factors, uncertainties, empirical correlations, etc

, used in the analysis been correctly applied?

30 Is the result presented with proper units and tolerance?

31.

Has proper consideration been given to results that may be overly sensitive to very small changes in input?

Conclusions 32.

Is the magnitude of the result reasonable and expected when compared to inputs?

33.

Is there a reasonable justification provided for deviations from the acceptance criteria?

34.

Are stated conclusions justifiable based on the calculation results?

35.

Are all pages sequentially numbered and marked with a valid calculation and revision number?

36.

Is all information legible and reproducible?

37.

Is the calculation presentation complete and understandable without any need to refer back to the Originator for clarification or explanations?

38.

Is calculation format presented in a logical and orderly manner, in conformance with the standard calculation content of NOP-CC-3002 (Attachment 1)?

39 Have all changes in the documentation been initialed (or signed) and dated by the author of the change and all required reviewers?

Design/Licensing 40.

Have all calculation results stayed within existing design/licensing basis parameters?

41.

If the response to Question 40 is NO, has Licensing been notified as appropriate? (i.e UFSAR or Tech Spec Change Request has been initiated).

42.

Is the direction of trends reasonable?

43.

Has the calculation Preparer used all applicable design information/requirements provided?

NA X

X X

X Yes X

X X

No CALCU REV.

2 ADDEN UNIT COMMENTS Tolerance applied in determining SVI limits were determined to be sufficient. See DVR Changes to USAR and SVI s will be tracked by CA s 08-39315-2 and 08-39315-3 respectively Page 2 of 3 LATIONNO.

PRDC-0015 DUM NO. 01 RESOLUTION

RrstEn&m CALCULATION REVIEW CHECKLIST NOP-CC-2001-04 Rev 05 QUESTION 44.

Did the calculation Preparer determine if the calculation was referenced in design basis documents and/or databases?

45.

Did the Preparer determine if the calculation was used as a reference in the UFSAR?

46.

If the calculation is used as a reference in the UFSAR, is a change to the UFSAR required or an update to the UFSAR Validation Database, if applicable, required?

47.

If the answer to Question 46 is YES, have the appropriate documents been initiated?

48.

Has the applicability of 10CFR50.59 to this calculation been considered and documented?

Acceptable 49.

Does the calculation meet its purpose/objective?

50.

Is the calculation acceptable for use?

51.

What checking method was used to review the calculation?

Check all that apply.

spot check for math complete check for math comparison with tests check by alternate method comparison with previous calculation 52.

If the calculation was prepared by a vendor, does it comply with the technical and quality requirements described in the Procurement Documents?

Reference the Purchase Order number or other procurement document number in the Comments Section of this question.

53.

Have Professional Engineer (PE) certification requirements been addressed and documented where required by ASME Code (if applicable).

NA X

X X

X Yes X

X X

No CALCULATION NO.

PRDC-01 REV.

2 ADDENDUM NO. 01 UNIT COMMENTS USAR Change is being tracked by CA 08-39315-2 Documents will be updated prior to performance of next SVI testinq Page 3 of 3

)15 RESOLUTION Review Summary:

See Design Verification Record Technical Review (Print and Sign Name)

N/A Design Verificati Stephen p. Morrea on (Print and Sign Name)

Date Date 6/18/08 Owner's Acceptance Review (Required for calculations prepared by a vendor)

Reviewer (Print and Sign Name)

Approver (Print and Sign Name)

Date Date

REGULATORY APPLICABILITY DETERMINATION N° °8'02693 NOP-LP-4003-O1 Rev 03 Page 1 of 2 ReV' 00 Initiating Activity No.

Calculations/USAR Change Notice (CN)

PRDC-0014, 0015, 0016 and USAR CN 08-093 Rev-N/A BVPS1 BVPS 2 D DBNPS 0 PNPP

Title:

Revision of Division 1, 2 & 3 Class 1E Battery Calculations and USAR Change Notice 08-093 Brief description of activity (what is being changed and why):

Calculation PRDC-0014, R/3 for Division 1 Battery Sizing and Load Evaluation Calculation PRDC-0015, R/2, Addendum A 01 for Division 2 Battery Sizing and Load Evaluation Calculation PRDC-0016, R/3, Addendum A 01 for Division 3 Battery Sizing and Load Evaluation USAR Change Notice 08-093 Calculations PRDC-0014,15 and 16 are being revised to change the 2 Hour design basis load profile that is also used in the USAR Table 8.3-7.

Currently the load currents used in this load profile are higher than the actual battery currents.

See CR 08-39315 for detail discussion on this subject.

The load profile is being revised to reflect load currents more realistic to the actual battery currents.

The calculation revisions also add the minimum voltage for each load step of the 2 Hours load profile.

Calculation PRDC-0014, R/3 has additional changes which are associated with ECP 04-0049-03 changes, outstanding Addendums and addition of battery inter-cell connector resistance (Ref. Operating Experience 25319).

There is no impact on the calculation results and conclusions by these revisions.

The ECP 04-0049-03 changes have been evaluated per 10 CFR 50.59 Evaluation #06-01428.

As a result of the calculation revisions, the USAR Table 8.3-7 and section 8.3.2.1.2.2 is being revised to reflect the calculation changes by this USAR Change Notice.

1.

EXEMPTIONS Is the scope of the entire activity exempt from the 10CFR50.59 process because it is limited to:

1.1 Managerial or administrative changes YES 0 NO 1.2 UFSAR changes (or equivalent information) excluded from the requirement to perform a 10CFR50 59 Screen and Evaluation by NEI 96-07 or NEI 98-03?

D YES 0 NO 1.3 Maintenance activities and temporary alterations in support of maintenance planned for 90 days or less while at power YES 0 NO 1 4 Changes evaluated under another program that included a 10CFR50.59 Screen YES 0 NO 2.

OTHER REGULATIONS 2.1 Does the activity require a license amendment?

2.1.1 Operating License YES 0 NO 2.1.2 Technical Specifications YES 0 NO 2.1.3 Environmental Protection Plan (BVPS and PNPP only)

YES 0 NO 2.2 Is the activity or any portion of the activity governed by one or more of the following regulations:

2.2.1 Quality Assurance Program (10CFR50.54(a))

YES

_] NO 2.2.2 Security Plans (1QCFR50.54(p))

DYES 0 NO 2.2.3 Emergency Plan (10CFR50.54(q))

YES 0 NO 2.2.4 1ST Program Plan (10CFR50.55(a)(f))

D YES 0 NO 2.2.5 ISI Program Plan (10CFR50.55(a)(g))

YES 0 NO 2.2.6 Fire Protection Program (10CFR50.48)

YES 0 NO 2.2.7 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Facility (10CFR72.48)

YES 0 NO 2.2.8 Another regulation:

Standards For Protection Against Radiation (10 CFR 20 including ODCM)

YES 0 NO Specific Exemptions (10 CFR 50.12)

YES 0 NO ECCS Acceptance Criteria (10 CFR 50.46)

YES 0 NO Environmental Protection (DBNPS only)

D YES 0 NO Other-list the regulation(s): __

DYES 0 NO

FirsflEhegav REGULATORY APPLICABILITY DETERMINATION NOP-LP-4003-01 Rev. 03 Page 2 of 2

No. 08-02693 Rev.

00 Initiating Activity No.

Calculations/USAR Change Notice (CN)

PRDC-0014, 0015, 0016 and USAR CN 08-093 Rev.

N/A BVPS1 BVPS 2 DBNPS PNPP 3.

CONCLUSION 3.1 Does 10CFR50.59 apply?

3.2 Does this activity require a change to the UFSAR?

Change Request No:

08-093 0YES 0YES I NO I NO 3.3 Summarize the bases for responses:

Include Keywords used to search documents.

Keywords:

Battery, Load Profile, Table 8.3-7 Calculation PRDC-0014,15 and 16 perform Division 1, 2 & 3 DC system load evaluations, Battery/Battery Charger sizing and voltage determination of various DC loads.

The calculations are being revised to change the 2 Hour design basis load profile that is also used in the USAR Table 8.3-7.

Calculation PRDC-0014, R/3 has additional changes which are associated with ECP 04-0049-03 changes, outstanding Addendums and addition of battery inter-cell connector resistance.

There is no impact on the calculation results and conclusions by these revisions.

The ECP 04-0049-03 changes have been evaluated per 10 CFR 50.59 Evaluation #06-01428.

As a result of the calculation revisions, USAR Table 8.3-7 and section 8.3.2.1.2.2 are being revised (USAR Change Notice 08-093).

Based on a review of the Operating License, the Technical Specifications and the screening questions for the Environmental Protection plan in NOBP-LP-4003A, this change does not warrant a change to any of those documents and a License Amendment is not required.

Since this change is governed by, and is being implemented consistent with the requirements of the FENOC QA Program Plan and the PNPP QA manual, 10 CFR 50.54 (a) does not apply to this change based on conformance to those requirements. The change has no effect on compliance with any remaining regulations cited in section 2.2 based on the limited scope of the change.

Since there are no applicable exemptions, 10 CFR 50.59 is considered to apply.

Preparer (Print name)

Chatterjee, Paritosh Date 7/14/2008 Reviewer (Print name)

Tanney, Ray V Signature Date 7/14/2008 Database Updated Signature

// - c/~J Date

/

ftrstEhenav 10 CFR 50.59 SCREEN NOP-LP-4003-02 Rev. 01 Page 1

of 5

No.

08-02693 Rev.

00 Initiating Activity No.

Calculations/USAR Change Notice (CN)

PRDC-0014, 0015. 0016 and USAR CN 08-093 Rev.

N/A BVPS 1 BVPS 2 IOBNPS PNPP Title Revision of Division 1, 2 & 3 Class 1E Battery Calculations and USAR Change Notice 08-093 Scope of activity being screened.

USAR Change Notice 08-093 and the following calculation revisions:

Calculation PRDC-0014, R/3 for Division 1 Battery Sizing and Load Evaluation Calculation PRDC-0015, R/2, Addendum A 01 for Division 2 Battery Sizing and Load Evaluation Calculation PRDC-0016, R/3, Addendum A 01 for Division 3 Battery Sizing and Load Evaluation USAR Table 8.3-7 provides the DC load profile fora 2 hour2.314815e-5 days 5.555556e-4 hours 3.306878e-6 weeks 7.61e-7 months design basis scenario.

Calculations PRDC-0014 for Division 1, PRDC-4015 for Division 2 and PRDC-0016 for Division 3 batteries establish the USAR Table 8.3-7 load profile.

The USAR Table 8.3-7 load profile is used during performance of Battery Service Tests per Surveillance Instructions (SVIs).

Currently, the minimum voltage acceptance criteria in the SVIs Is 2 105 (1.75 volts/cell) volts and is in accordance with the USAR section 8.3.2.1.2.2.

The 105 volts is the battery sizing minimum design voltage when a battery is completely discharged.

The minimum acceptable voltage for the Service Test related SVIs should be equal or more than the voltages established in the battery design calculations PRDC-0014,0015 and 0016.

All the Division 1, 2 & 3 DC components have been evaluated to perform their design basis functions based on the voltages in these calculations.

Therefore, the minimum voltage acceptance criteria in the SVIs should be equal or more than the voltage established in these calculations.

Refer to CR 08 -39315 for detailed evaluation of this issue.

The USAR section 8.3.2.1.2.2 is also being revised per the above calculations to state that batteries are sized to supply the Table 8.3-7 loads for 2 Hours and to meet the criteria given in IEEE Std. 308 and applicable design basis listed in USAR Table 8.1-2.

Presently the service tests for Division 1 & 2 batteries are performed using load currents much higher than the design basis load currents in the design calculations.

Use of a higher load current during the service test is not a concern to battery life, but providing higher than required load currents to batteries is not necessary and is not recommended.

See CR 08-39315 for detail evaluation of this issue.

The above calculations and the Table 8.3-7 load profile are being revised to reflect load currents more realistic to the design basis load currents established in the above calculations.

This Change Notice also revises the load profile time steps as follows to distribute the load currents evenly.

Division 1 >>1 to 3 Min step is changed to 1 to 2 Min and 2 to 3 Min Division 2 > 2 to 10 Min step is changed to 2 to 3 Min and 3 to 10 Min Division 3 > No change Calculation PRDC-0014, R/3 has additional changes which are associated with ECP 04-0049-03 changes, outstanding Addendums and addition of battery inter-cell connector resistance per Operating Experience (OE)

Report 25319.

Addition of minor inter-cell resistance in battery sizing and voltage drop calculations does not alter calculation results and conclusions.

The ECP 04-0049-03 changes (including Calculation changes) have been evaluated per 10 CFR 50.59 Evaluation #06-01428 with the ECP 04-0049-03 package.

As a result of the calculation revisions, USAR Table 8.3-7 and section 8.3.2.1.2.2 are being revised to reflect the calculation changes by this USAR Change Notice.

List the UFSAR-described design functions potentially affected by the activity.

Class 1E Division 1 and 2,125 volt DC Systems are discussed in section 8.3.2.1.2.

8.3.2.1.2.1

- The Class 1E, Division 1 and Division 2,125-volt DC systems are two completely redundant systems.

Each division is capable of supplying required DC power to the associated loads needed for safe shutdown.

No non-Class 1E loads are supplied from Class 1E DC system.

Each system includes a 60 cell, 1260 ampere hour battery, a 400 ampere battery charger and a load center.

The battery chargers are located with the equipment associated with Unit 1 but can be connected to the appropriate division of either the Unit 1 or Unit 2, Class 1E, 125-volt DC system by means of the maintenance tie buses.

No interdivisional ties are provided between the divisions associated with Unit 1 or Unit 2.

Maintenance tie buses connect only the same divisions of the two units (i.e., Unit 1, Division 1 to Unit 2, Division 1).

If the DC batteries are the only available power source, the maintenance tie circuit breakers may be closed to allow the Unit 1

- Unit 2 batteries to be paralleled.

USAR Figure 8.3-21 illustrates the connection of batteries, battery chargers, load centers, motor control.

RrstEhe/tjv 10CFR NOP-LP-4003-02 Rev. 01 Initiating Activity No.

Calculations/USAR Change Notice (CN)

PRDC-0014, D BVPS1 BVPS 2 50.59 SCREEN Page 2 of 5

0015, 0016 and USAR CN 08-093 DBNPS 0 PNPP No.

Rev.

08-02693 00 N/A and distribution panels of the Class 1E, Division 1 & 2,125-volt DC systems.

USAR Table 8.3-7 provides load requirements for Division 1,2 & 3,125 VDC class 1E batteries.

The load profiles are used for Battery Service Tests per SVI-R42-T5211, 5212, 5213 and 5214 and SVI-E22-T5213 & T5214.

8.3.2.1.2.2 - The Class 1E, Division 1 & 2,125-volt DC system batteries are sized to supply the required DC loads shown in Table 8.3-7 for a minimum of two hours without the final discharge voltage decreasing to less than the design battery sizing minimum of 1.75 volts/cell.

This section is being revised by this Change Notice to state that the batteries are sized to supply the Table 8.3-7 loads for 2 Hours and to meet the criteria given in IEEE Standard 308 and applicable design basis listed in Table 8.1-2.

Sizing of the batteries includes a design margin of 1.15, an aging factor of 1.25 and also corrects for ambient temperature.

During normal operation the battery chargers supply the continuous DC load while maintaining a float charge on the batteries.

As shown by Figure 8.3-4, the Division 1 & 2 batteries are located with the battery chargers.

All components of the Division 1 & 2,125 volt dc system are housed in a Seismic Category I structure.

8.3.2.1.2.3 - The 125 VDC system and the associated loads and controls supplied by the 125 VDC system are designed to operate from 140 VDC (maximum corrected equalizing charge) to the minimum device voltage consistent with the design basis battery voltage profile and device operating time.

This section has also discussion related to the following:

a. Batteries and Battery Racks

b. Battery Chargers

c. DC Load Centers

d. DC Motor Control Centers

e. DC Distribution Panels 8.3.2.1.2.4 - This section has discussion related to charging of the Division 1 & 2 batteries.

High Pressure Core Spray Division 3,125 volt DC System is discussed in section 8.3.2.1.3.

8.3.2.1.3.1

- General discussion of Division 3 DC system is discussed in this section.

The objective of the Division 3,125 volt dc power system is to provide a continuous and independent 125 volt DC source of control and motive power as required for HPCS system logic, HPCS diesel generator control and protection and all Division 3 related 125 volt DC control.

A normal and a reserve battery charger are provided.

The reserve battery charger is connected to the tie bus between Units 1 and 2.

The Division 3,125 volt DC system is classified as Class 1E.

The system is independent of all other divisional batteries and there is no manual or automatic connection to Division 1 and Division 2 battery systems.

A manually operated maintenance tie between Unit 1 and Unit 2 Division 3 DC systems is provided for the purpose of maintenance or equalizing the battery.

If the DC batteries are the only available power source, the maintenance tie circuit breakers may be closed to allow the Unit 1 &

Unit 2 batteries to be paralleled.

8.3.2.1.3.2 - This section has discussion about High Pressure Core Spray DC Loads.

Division 3,125 volt DC power is required for HPCS diesel generator field flashing, control logic and the control and switching function of circuit breakers.

Table 8.3 7 lists Division 3,125 volt DC loads.

Unlike Division 1 & 2 batteries, there is no minimum voltage requirement for the Table 8.3-7 load profile for Division 3 batteries.

8.3.2.1.3.3

- This section has discussion about the Division 3 Battery and Battery Charger.

The 125 volt DC system for the HPCS power supply has a 60 cell, lead calcium battery (250 ampere hours at 8 hours9.259259e-5 days 0.00222 hours 1.322751e-5 weeks 3.044e-6 months ), one 50 ampere battery charger, one 50 ampere reserve battery charger, and a distribution panel with molded case circuit breakers.

The 125 volt DC system equipment is designed as Class 1E in accordance with the applicable clauses of IEEE Standard 308.

It is designed so that no single failure in the system will result in conditions that prevent safe shutdown of the plant.

The plant design and circuit layout of the DC systems provide physical separation of equipment, cabling and instrumentation essential to plant safety.

As shown by Figure 8.3-3, the battery is located with the battery chargers.

All components of the Division 3,125 volt DC system are housed in a Seismic Category I structure.

8.3.2.1.3.4 - This section is for Division 3 DC system identification.

Figure 8.3-22 shows the Division 3,125 volt

FffStEngqy NOP-LP-4003-02 Rev 01 10CFR Initiating Activity No.

Calculations/USAR Change Notice (CN)

PRDC-0014, D BVPS1 BVPS 2 50.59 SCREEN 0015, 0016 and USAR CN D DBNPS Page 08-093 3 of 5

0 PNPP No.

Rev.

08-02693 00 N/A DC system.

The battery feeds into the distribution panel.

The battery charger is fed from the 480 volt ESF motor control center which is supplied by the HPCS diesel generator bus.

The Division 3,125 volt DC system distribution panel serves the various HPCS system DC loads.

8.3.2.1.3.5 Battery Capacity is discussed in this section.

The ampere hour capacity and short time rating of the Division 3 battery are in accordance with criteria given in IEEE Standard 308 and applicable design bases listed in Table 8.1-2.

The battery has sufficient stored energy to operate required connected essential loads for as long as each may be needed during a loss of the AC bus supplying the battery chargers under normal or emergency conditions.

The Division 3 battery charger is capable of recharging the Division 3 battery from a fully discharged condition in eight hours while also supplying the steady state DC bus loads.

Capacity is large enough to cope with LOCA conditions or any other emergency shutdown.

Each distribution circuit is capable of transmitting sufficient energy to start and operate all required loads in that circuit.

The Division 3,125 volt battery is sized in accordance with the principles set out in IEEE Standard 308.

USAR Figure 8.3-22 illustrates the connection of batteries, battery chargers, load centers, motor control center, and distribution panels of the Class 1E, Division 3,125-volt DC system.

8.3.2.1.3.6 and 8.3.2.1.4 is for Division 3 battery charging and battery room ventilation system discussion.

8.3.2.1.5 - Division 3 Battery Maintenance and Tests are discussed in this section.

Periodic maintenance tests are performed on the 125 volt DC systems to determine the condition of each individual component.

Batteries will be checked for electrolyte level, specific gravity, cell voltage, and visual indications of deterioration.

A performance discharge test of the batteries will be conducted regularly.

Battery chargers will be visually inspected and performance tests will be conducted on a regularly scheduled basis.

General maintenance and testing procedures will be in accordance with IEEE Standard 450(Reference 15), for Class 1E equipment as detailed in the technical specifications.

8.3.2.2.1

- Compliance with General Design Criteria and regulatory Guides is discussed in this section.

Table 1.8-1

- This Table lists NRC Regulatory Guides (RG) which Perry has complied to follow.

Three RGs 1.32, 1.128 and 1.129 related to batteries are listed in this Table.

The RGs are related to criteria for DC Power System installation & design, Maintenance, Testing and Replacement Table 8.1 This Table list IEEE Std. 308-1974 as design basis for Class 1E power systems.

The design of the Class 1E Power System is in accordance with IEEE Std. 308-1974, as modified by Regulatory Guide 1.32.

3.1.2.2.8.1

- This section is for Evaluation against Design Criterion 17.

It states that the onsite and offsite power systems each independently provide the total power requirements for essential systems to perform the required engineered safety feature function.

Three onsite independent battery systems per unit provide 125 Vdc motive power and control power for three redundant and independent power distribution systems for engineered safety systems as well as control power for other onsite power systems.

5.4.6.2.4

With respect to System Reliability Considerations, this section states that control independence is secured by using different battery systems to provide control power to each unit.

Separate detection initiation logics are also used for each system.

15H.2.1.5 - For coping with Station Blackout, the PNPP Class 1E battery system is capable of supporting the necessary SBO loads for 4 hours4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months .

The class 1E system is comprised of four separate battery subsystems.

Two of the subsystems are associated with Unit 1, one for Division 1 and one for Division 2.

Similarly, Unit 2 has the same battery configuration. The Unit 2 batteries have been put into service to support Unit 1 operations.

A maintenance cross tie exists between the Divisional Unit 1 and Unit 2 batteries.

This cross tie provides the 4 hour4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months battery capacity.

No Unit 1 load shedding was assumed in determining the capability to supply DC power to necessary loads during the 4 hour4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months duration of the SBO event 10CFR 50.59 screening questions.

Check the correct response.

FirstEnemv 10 CFR 50.59 SCREEN NOP-LP-4003-02 Rev 01 Page 4 of 5

No.

08-02693 Rev.

00 Initiating Activity No.

Calculations/USAR Change Notice (CN)

PRDC-0014, 0015, 0016 and USAR CN 08-093 Rev.

N/A BVPS1 BVPS 2 O DBNPS PNPP 1.

Does the proposed activity involve a change to an SSC that adversely affects an D YES 0 NO UFSAR-described design function?

2.

Does the proposed activity involve a change to a procedure that adversely affects how D YES 0 NO UFSAR-described SSC design functions are performed or controlled?

3.

Does the proposed activity involve revising or replacing an UFSAR-described D YES 0 NO evaluation methodology used in establishing the design bases or in the safety analyses?

4.

Does the proposed activity involve a test or experiment not described in the UFSAR, D YES 0 NO where an SSC is utilized or controlled in a manner that is outside the reference bounds of the design for that SSC or is inconsistent with analyses or descriptions in the UFSAR?

List the documents reviewed where relevant information was found, including section numbers and key words searched:

UFSAR Sections:

8.3.2.1.2.1,8.3.2.1.2.2,8.3.2.1.2.3,8.3 2.1.2.4, Change Request No.08-093 8.3.2.1 3.1, 8.3.2.1.3.2, 8.3.2.1.3.3, 8.3.2.1.3.4, 8.3 2.1.3.6, 8.3.2.1.3.5, 8.3.2.1.4, 8.3.2.1.5, 8.3.2.2.1, Table 1.8-1, 3.1.2.2.8.1, 5.4.6.2.4, Table 8.1-1, 15H.2.1.5, Figure 8.3-3, 8.3-4, 8.3-21, 8.3-22, Table 8.3-7.

Technical Specifications:

3.8.4, 3.8.5, 3.8 6, 3.8.7, 3.8.8 Other regulatory documents:

Safety Evaluation Reports including the Supplements, Operational Requirements Manual (ORM), and Operating License (OL) including its Amendments.

Keywords:

Battery, Load Profile, Table 8.3-7 D At least one question is answered YES.

Perform a 10CFR50.59 Evaluation.

0 All questions are answered NO. A 10CFR50.59 Evaluation is not required.

Justify the determination:

Revisions to calculations PRDC-0014, 0015 and 0016 conclude that the Division 1, 2 & 3 Battery/Battery Chargers are adequately sized and the voltages at various DC loads are within their acceptable voltage limit There is no addition or deletion of loads and as a result there is no change to the total battery load current by the calculation revisions.

However, Table 8.3-7 load profile currents have been adjusted to make the load profile more realistic to the design basis load currents.

USAR section 8.3.2.1.2.2 is also being revised to change the acceptable voltage for the Table 8.3-7 load profile to the voltages established in the design calculations.

The changes in the calculations and in the Table 8.3-7 load profile will have no impact on the design functions of Battery/Battery Charger and the DC loads as described in USAR sections 8.3.2.1.2.1 and 8.3.2.1.3.1. The Batteries will continue supplying the required DC loads as described in USAR sections 8.3.2.1.2.2, 8.3.2.1.3.2 and Table 8.3-7. There will be no impact to USAR sections 8.3.2.1.2.3, 8.3.2.1.3.3, 8.3.2.1.3.4, 8.3.2.1.3.5 and Figure 8.3-21 & 22 by this activity.

Each of the above maintained USAR sections was individually reviewed and none of them will be impacted by this activity.

There is no hardware change involved with this activity. Consequently, no new failure mode and effects are created and this activity does not introduce any new type of accident or malfunction.

There are no effects on USAR safety analysis by this activity. No additional maintenance or repetitive tasks are created by this activity.

A review was conducted of Perry Safety Evaluation Reports including the Supplements, Operational Requirements Manual (ORM), and Operating License (OL) including its Amendments.

A review was also conducted of the Technical Specification sections 3.8.4, 3.8.5, 3.8.6,3.8.7, 3.8.8 and their bases and determined that none of these sections will be impacted by the proposed activity.

There is no change to the design basis limit for a fission product barrier (either positively or negatively) by this calculation revision.

Based on the above discussion, it can be concluded that there are no adverse effects on any of the potentially affected USAR described design functions associated with the activity.

Procedures & other USAR discussed actions that describe how the 125 VDC system (R42 & E22) system

firsffineray 10 NOP-LP-4003-02 Rev 01 CFR Initiating Activity No.

Calculations/USAR Change Notice (CN)

PRDC-0014, DBVPS1 D BVPS 2 50.59 SCREEN Page 5 of 5

0015, 0016 and USAR CN 08-093 DBNPS 0 PNPP No.

Rev.

08-02693 00 N/A and components are operated and controlled were reviewed.

The review determined that the calculation revisions & USAR Change does not result in any changes to procedures, instructions, or controls (other than Service Test SVIs) that would adversely affect how the class 1E DC System design functions are performed or controlled.

The Batteries have large capacity & high margin relative to its support loads.

The battery surveillance testing will be performed per the revised USAR Table 8.3-7 load profile.

There is no change or impact on how any SSC (i.e. Battery) is operated or controlled under plant operating conditions. Consequently, this activity will not adversely affect how USAR described design functions are performed or controlled.

The activity is for a revision to design calculations and a USAR change.

The activity does not impact the manner in which any control logic of 1E equipment is operated or controlled.

The activity does not involve any changes to any methods of evaluation used in analysis that demonstrate that design basis limits of fission product barriers are met.

This activity does not involve any changes to any methods of evaluation used in USAR Chapter 6 and 9 safety analysis, including containment, ECCS and accident analysis that demonstrate consequence of accidents do not exceed 10CFR100 or 10CFR50, Appendix A, dose limits.

There is no impact on any calculation framework that is used for evaluating behavior or response of any of the R42 or E22 systems.

None of the above listed USAR sections are impacted by this activity.

Therefore, the proposed activity does not involve revising or replacing any USAR-described evaluation methodology that is used in establishing the design bases or in the safety analyses.

The proposed activity does not adversely impact any of the Divisional Batteries & Battery Chargers

~

capacity and any of the 125 VDC loads supplied from the DC bus.

Since the activity maintains compliance with applicable USAR described standards and design codes, it is not considered to be experimental.

The calculation revision and USAR change do not involve any activity where any structure, system, or component is utilized or controlled in a manner which is either outside the reference bounds of the design basis as described in the USAR, or inconsistent with the analyses or descriptions in the USAR.

Preparer (Print name)

Chatterjee, Paritosh Reviewer (Print name)

Tanney, Ray V Signature

/^.

Ty Date 7/14/2008 Date 7/14/2008 Database updated

[ftj Signature

~^\\'

Date

/tt,/

FirstEnew DESIGN INTERFACE EVALUATION NOP-CC-2004-07 Rev. 04 Modification/Document/Activity-1) Calculation PRDC-0014, R/3

2) Calculation PRDC-0015, R/2.A01

3) Calculation PRDC-0016, R/3, A 01

4) USAR Change Notice 08-093 D BV1 l

BV2 Proposed Rev.

N/A D DB l

Page 1

of 2 DIE NoVRev.

0/0 E

py SECTION 1 -

SUMMARY

OF CHANGE & POTENTIAL IMPACT To: Interfacing Organization EAB Point of Contact Lori McGuire Mail Stop A165 Due Date From/Return To:

(Responsible Engineer)

Pan Chatterjee Mail Stop A165 Phone 5209 Description of Change/Areas of Concern Review of the above documents SECTION 2-RESPONSF REFER TO NOP-CC-2004, SECTION 4.2.1 AND ATTACHMENT 1

FOR GUIDANCE.

DIRC Impact(s) - Evaluate impact identified by the following questions from the Design Interface Review Checklist.

Topic/Question No.

Question Other Impact(s) - Evaluate impact from the following General and Subject Matter Expert level questions.

Describe impact on operational configuration, system interactions, and any other pertinent considerations Identify required actions See comments.

IF the change will add, modify, or delete equipment, components, systems, or processes that result in the need for personnel to acquire additional skills and knowledge THEN complete the Affected Documents section below.

Identify Training as the Document Type; assign an Action Code, and Responsible Organization.

See comments.

Identify potential failure mechanisms and failure consequences.

See comments Identify relevant design criteria and standards (including applicable revision/addenda).

See comments Identify any limitations such as open assumptions or engineering holds.

Identify what is restrained and what is required to release the hold See comments Describe effect on current licensing basis for the system/structure/component (SSC) involved See comments Identify appropriate installation requirements and acceptance criteria for testing.

See comments Describe effect of proposed change on existing design basis.

See comments COMMENTS/ADDITIONAL INPUT/ INFORMATION The purpose of this DIE is to afford the opportunity for EAB to determine if final EAB review of the product is needed.

Final review of these calcs is requested AFFECTED DOCUMENTS List new and/or existing documents requiring issue/update as a result of this activity (e.g., drawings, procedures, databases, lesson plans, and vendor manuals).

It is presumed the latest revision/version of the document was used when identifying the impact.

Document Type Document I.D.

Unit Rev Version Document Owner/

Responsible Organization Action Code*

Notification No **

'Action Codes'

DESIGN INTERFACE EVALUATION NOP-CC-2004-07 Rev 04 Modification/Document/Activity-1) Calculation PRDC-0014, R/3

2) Calculation PRDC-0015, R/2, A 01

3) Calculation PRDC-0016, R/3, A 01

4) USAR Change Notice 08-093 Proposed Rev.

N/A Page 2 of 2 DIE NoJRev.

0/0 1

- Required for Operational Acceptance.

2 - Required for implementation.

Requires an Engineering Hold per NOP-CC-2003.

3 - Required to be issued concurrent with the change package.

4 - Required for closeout of the activity 5 - Later-can be completed when responsible organization deems appropriate. "Requires a SAP Notification number.

SECTION 3 -CONCLUSION IE!

Interface Not Required (Provide Justification)

See comments D

Interface Provided (Indicate if Final Review required)

Interface EvaluatorYPrinf Name and Sign)

LonMcGmre /tfjulrf/Y\\ $U

^~

Date 7/21/08 B Final Review required Approval*

(Print Name and Sign)

Date SECTION 4

- FINAL REVIEW Comments need to be resolved Interl Evalua D

My comments/input have been properly incorporated and/or addressed ace Evaluator Date

'Required for Engineering Organizations