ML15264B146
| ML15264B146 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Millstone  |
| Issue date: | 09/21/2015 |
| From: | Richard Guzman Plant Licensing Branch 1 |
| To: | Craft W Dominion Nuclear Connecticut |
| Guzman R | |
| References | |
| TAC MF6709 | |
| Download: ML15264B146 (1) | |
Text
From:
Guzman, Richard Sent:
Monday, September 21, 2015 5:40 PM To:
'wanda.d.craft@dom.com' Cc:
RidsNRRLIC109 Resource
Subject:
Acceptance Review Determination - Millstone Power Station Unit 3 -
License Amendment Request to Revise TS 5.6.3, Fuel Storage Capacity Description (MF6709)
- Wanda, The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the NRC staffs acceptance review of the subject license amendment request (LAR).
By letter dated August 31, 2015 (ADAMS Accession No. ML15246A118), Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc. (DNC) submitted an LAR proposing to revise the MPS3 Technical Specification 5.6.3, Fuel Storage Capacity, to specify the spent fuel pool storage capacity limit in terms of the total number of fuel assemblies.
The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The NRC staff has reviewed DNCs application and concludes that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staffs detailed technical review by separate correspondence
- Thanks, Rich Guzman Sr. Project Manager NRR/DORL US NRC 301-415-1030