ML15261A217

Submits Summary of 981105 Training Managers Conference. List of Attendees & Matl Used in Presentation Enclosed

ML15261A217
Person / Time
Site:	Oconee
Issue date:	12/23/1998
From:	Peebles T NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:	Mccollum W DUKE POWER CO.
References
NUDOCS 9901210332
Download: ML15261A217 (84)

Text

December 23, 1998 Duke Energy Corporation ATTN: Mr. William R. McCollum, Jr.

Vice President, Oconee Site P. 0. Box 1439 Seneca, SC 29679

SUBJECT:

MEETING

SUMMARY

- TRAINING MANAGERS' CONFERENCE CONDUCTED ON NOVEMBER 5,1998 - OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION

Dear Mr. McCollum:

This letter refers to the Training Managers' Conference conducted at the Richard B. Russell Building on November 5, 1998. Representatives from all utilities in Region II participated in the meeting. was the agenda used for the Training Managers' Conference, and Enclosure 2 is the list of attendees. We appreciate the participation of you and your staff and believe that the goal of providing an open forum for discussion of operator licensing issues was met. Mr. Gallo, Chief of the Operator Licensing and Human Factors Branch, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR), made a presentation as noted in the slides in Enclosure 3.

Additionally, I am enclosing our preliminary schedule for FY 1999 and FY2000 as Enclosure 4.

Please review the schedule and supply comments to my staff or myself.

If you have any questions regarding the content of this letter, please contact me at (404) 562-4638.

Sincerely, Original signed by Thomas A. Peebles Thomas A. Peebles, Chief Operator Licensing and Human Performance Branch Division of Reactor Safety Docket Nos.: 50-269, 50-270, and 50-287 License Nos.: DPR-38, DPR-47, and DPR-55

Enclosures:

As noted cc w/encls:

B. K. Jones, Training Manager, Oconee Nuclear Station J. E. Burchfield, Compliance L. A. Keller, Licensing 9901210332 981223 PDR ADOCK 05000269 V

PDR

DEC 2

Distribution w/encls:

PUBLIC B. Michael, DRS RII:DRS RIl:DRS BMICHAEL:

TPEEBLES 12/ // /98 12/7/98 Doc Name:

Revised November 3, 1998 TRAINING AND OPERATIONS MANAGERS' CONFERENCE U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Conunission, Region II Atlanta, Georgia Meeting Agenda November 5, 1998 Richard B. Russell Building Auditorium Thursday, 11/5/98 8:00 a.m.

Conference Registration 8:20 a.m.

Introduction Thomas A. Peebles, Chief, Operator Licensing & Human Performance Branch 8:30 a.m.

Opening Remarks William Travers, Executive Director of Operations 8:50 a.m.

Welcome / Issues Raised the Last Meeting Bruce S. Mallett, Director Division of Reactor Safety 9:15 a.m.

break 9:45 a.m.

Other Issues Robert M. Gallo, Chief Operator Licensing Branch, NRR 10:15 a.m.

Lessons Learned from Recent Exams Charlie Payne Sampling exam criteria 11:00 a.m.

Examination Communications Ron Aiello Exam Development & Coordination 11:30 a.m.

Lunch 1:00 p.m.

Written Examination Questions and Answers Rick Baldwin / George Hopper 2:30 p.m.

JPM Examples of questions Rick Baldwin / George Hopper 3:30 p.m.

Open Session - Other Issues Training Managers 4:00 p.m.

Meet with Principle examiners All 4:30 p.m.

Adjorn

ATTENDEES AT THE NRC REGION II TRAINING MANAGERS CONFERENCE NOVEMBER 5,1998 Sid Crouch ATTSi David Lane Sonalysts, Inc.

Bill Fitzpatrick INPO CP&L Rick Garner HR

. Supv Ops Trng William Noll BK Ops Trng Supv Max Herrell BK Trng Mgr Scott Poteet RB Exam Team Leader Ralph Mullis BK Ops Mgr Tony Pearson BK Ops Trng Anthony Williams RB Trng Mgr Crystal River - FPC Wes Young CR Supv OpsTng Tom Taylor CR Dir Nuc Ops Tmg Ivan Wilson CR Ops Mgr Ken McCall CR Mgr Ops Trng Duke Power Gabriel Washburn OC Req Team Leader Ronnie B. White, Jr MG Tmg Mgr W. H. "Soap" Miller CT Site Tmg Mgr Paul Stovall OC Mgr Oper Trng Bentley Jones OC Trng Mgr James Teofilak CT Ops Trng Mgr Alan Orton MG Ops Tmg Mgr Richard Bugert Corp Ops Tmg Spec FP&L Maria Lacal TP Trng Mgr Dennis L. Fadden SL Services Mgr Jo Magennis Corp Trng Assessment Spec Tom Bolander SL Exam Development Steve McGarry TP Maint Trng Supv Southern Nuclear (SNC)

John C. Lewis HT Trng & EP Mgr Bill Oldfield FA Nuc Ops Trn Supv Steve Grantham HT Ops Tmg Supv Scott Fulmer FA Mgr Trng & EP Joel Deavers FA Sr PIt Inst Bob Brown VG Trng Mgr Dan Scukanec VG Ops Trng Supv

Virginia Power Steve Crawford NA Sr Inst Nuc Harold McCallum SR Supv Ops Trng TVA Dick Driscoll SQ Trng Mgr Walt Hunt SQ Ops Trng Mgr Denny Campbell BF SRO Ops Inst Jack Cox WB Trng Mgr John Roden WB Ops Trng Mgr Tom Wallace WB Ops Supt V. C. Summer - SCE&G Al Koon SM Ops Trng Supv NRC Participants Tom Peebles R II Operator Lic. Br. Ch.

Rick Baldwin R II Sr. Examiner George Hopper R II Sr. Examiner Ron Aiello R II Sr. Examiner Charlie Payne R 11 Sr. Examiner William Travers NRC Executive Dir. Ops.

R. M. Gallo NRR Br. Ch. OL Bruce Mallett R II Div. Dir. Reactor Safety

FY 99 INITIAL EXAM SCHEDULE AND RESULTS December 14, 1998 RO SRO-I SRO-U TOTAL Date Plant Chief Pass Pass Pass Pass 9/28/98 Sequoyah GTH 4

4 4

4 10/5/98 Harris RFA 2

2 5

5 7

7 11/30/98 Oconee GTH 2

2 5

5 7

7 11/30/98 St Lucie &

RSB 6

3 9

12/14/98 1/25/99 McGuire &

DCP 6

3 2

11 2/8/99 2/8/99 C. River&

GTH 6

6 12 2/22/99 2/8/99 B.Ferry MEE 4

1 5

3/29/99 Surry &

RSB 5

2 4

11 4/12/99 4/12/99 Watts Bar &

MEE 6

3 5

14 4/26/99 5/10/99 Farley GTH 7

1 8

5/24/99 Catawba &

PMS 8

5 3

1.6 6/7/99 6/28/99 St. Lucie RSB 1

4 5

07/26/99 Robinson MEE 3

2 2

7 08/30/99 Turkey Pt &

RFA 20 20 9/13/99 136 RESULTS TO DATE 4

5 5 9 9 18 18 100 100 100 100 No Initial exams scheduled for:

Brunswick, North Anna and Vogtle FY 00 region II write part of Summer & Hatch

FY 00 INITIAL EXAM SCHEDULE AND RESULTS cember 14, 1998 RO SRO-1 SRO-U TOTAL Date Plant Chief Pass Pass Pass Pass 0

9/27/99 Summer GTH 6

6 region 11 write 10/18/99 Hatch DCP 10 2

12 region // write 12/13/99 Vogtle RSB 3

5 2

10 2/14/00 Brunswick &

DCP 12 3

15 2/28/00 03/**/00 Oconee ?

10

?04/10/00 Harris (maybe 10/00) 10

?05/03/00 St. Lucie GTH 6

5 11

?05/**/00 B. Ferry 6

3 3

12

?05/03/00 McGuire 4

8 12

?06/07/00Farley RSB 1 10 2

12

?07/26/00 Crystal River RFA 3

3 3

9 region // write?

?08/**/00 Sequoyah 4

2 2

8

?09/04/00 Surry?

10

?09/11/00 North Anna 12 0

0 42 0

46 0 27 0

149 designates tentative No Initial exams scheduled for:

Catawba Robinson Turkey Point Watts Bar

Operator Licensing Issues Region II Training Managers' Conference November 5, 1998 Robert M. Gallo, Chief Operator -Licensing and Human Performance Branch

OPERATOR LICENSING ISSUES o Part 55 Rulemakings Status Schedule o Final Revision 8 of NUREG-1021 o Examination Quality and Results o Generic Fundamentals Exam o Requal Inspections (IP-71001) o Recent Information Notices Exam Integrity (IN 98-15)

Sampling Plans (IN 98-28)

Eligibility (IN 98-37)

RECENT LESSONS LEARNED by Charlie Payne.

Southeastern Training Manager's Conference November 5, 1998

POLICY CLARIFICATIONS In general, the NRC prefers that the written exam be administered after the operating tests are complete.

Allows more time to finalize test.

More flexibility if delays occur.

Less stressful on candidates.

POLICY CLARIFICATIONS In general, license class sizes of greater than 8 candidates will be scheduled for 2 weeks as follows:

1st exam week off-week for documentation of week 1 performance 2 nd exam week

POLICY CLARIFICATIONS Examination submittals - 2 copies of draft and final exams (written, JPMs, and simulator scenarios). Electronic copy is also desired.

Written exams submittals will be reviewed by following a sampling process. When criteria are met, review will be stopped and licensee called.

Criteria - 10 unacceptable questions out of 30 questions sampled 4

RECENT LESSONS LEARNED SRO-only Questions intended to sample those K/As specific to SRO duties (above and beyond those needed by an RO).

purpose is to meet the requirements of 10 CFR 55.43(b) (items (1) - (7)).

K/A catalog cross-references K/As to associated portions of 10 CFR 55.

5

2.0 GENERIC KNOWLEDGES AND ABILITIES 2.1 Conduct of Operations 2.1.1 Knowledge of conduct of operations requirements.

(CFR: 41.10 / 45.13)

IMPORTANCE RO 3.7 SRO 3.8 2.1.2 Knowledge of operator responsibilities during all modes of plant operation.

(CFR: 41.10 / 45.13)

IMPORTANCE RO 3.0 SRO 4.0 2.1.3 Knowledge of shift turnover practices.

(CFR: 41.10 / 45.13)

IMPORTANCE RO 3.0 SRO 3.4 2.1.4 Knowledge of shift staffing requirements.

(CFR: 41.10 / 43.2)

IMPORTANCE RO 2.3 SRO 3.4 2.1.5. Ability to locate and use procedures and directives related to shift staffing and activities.

(CFR: 41.10 / 43.5 / 45.12)

IMPORTANCE RO 2.3 SRO 3.4 2.1.6 Ability to supervise and assume a management role during plant transients and upset conditions.

(CFR: 43.5 / 45.12/45.13)

IMPORTANCE RO 2.1 SRO 4.3 2.1.7 Ability to evaluate plant performance and make operational judgments based on operating characteristics / reactor behavior / and instrument interpretation.

(CFR: 43.5 / 45.12 / 45.13)

IMPORTANCE RO 3.7 SRO 4.4 2.1.8 Ability to coordinate personnel activities outside the control room.

(CFR: 45.5 / 45.12 / 45.13)

IMPORTANCE RO 3.8 SRO 3.6 2-1 NUREG-1123. Rev.

2

2.1 Conduct of Operations (continued) 2.1.19 Ability to use plant computer to obtain and evaluate parametric information on system or component status.

(CFR: 45.12)

IMPORTANCE RO 3.0 SRO 3.0 2.1.20 Ability to execute procedure steps.

(CFR: 41.10 / 43.5 / 45.12)

IMPORTANCE RO 4.3 SRO 4.2 2.1.21 Ability to obtain and verify controlled procedure copy.

(CFR: 45.10 / 45.13)

IMPORTANCE RO 3.1 SRO 3.2 2.1.22 Ability to determine Mode of Operation.

(CFR: 43.5 / 45.13)

IMPORTANCE RO 2.8 SRO 3.3 2.1.23 Ability to perform specific system and integrated plant procedures during different modes of plant operation.

(CFR: 45.2 / 45.6)

IMPORTANCE RO 3.9 SRO 4.0 2.1.24 Ability to obtain and interpret station electrical and mechanical drawings.

(CFR: 45.12 / 45.13)

IMPORTANCE RO 2.8 SRO 3.1 2.1.25 Ability to obtain and interpret station reference materials such as graphs /

monographs / and tables which contain performance data.

(CFR: 41.10 / 43.5 / 45.12)

IMPORTANCE RO 2.8 SRO 3.1 2.1.26 Knowledge of non-nuclear safety procedures (e.g. rotating equipment / electrical high temperature / high pressure / caustic / chlorine / oxygen and hydrogen).

(CFR: 41.10 / 45.12)

IMPORTANCE RO 2.2 SRO 2.6 2-3 NURE-1123, Rev.

2

2.4 Emergency Procedures /Plan (Continued) 2.4.32 Knowledge of operator response to loss of all annunciators.

(CFR: 41.10 / 43.5 / 45.13)

IMPORTANCE RO 3.3 SRO 3.5 2.4.33 Knowledge of the process used track inoperable alarms.

(CFR: 41.10 / 43.5 / 45.13)

IMPORTANCE RO 2.4 SRO 2.8 2.4.34 Knowledge of RO tasks performed outside the main control room during emergency operations including sysiem geography and system implications.

(CFR: 43.5 / 45.13)

IMPORTANCE RO 3.8 SRO 3.6 2.4.35 Knowledge of local auxiliary operator tasks during emergency operations including system geography and system implications.

(CFR: 43.5 / 45.13)

IMPORTANCE RO 3.3 SRO 3.5 2.4.36 Knowledge of chemistry / health physics tasks during emergency operations.

(CFR: 43.5)

IMPORTANCE RO 2.0 SRO 2.8 2.4.37 Knowledge of the lines of authority during an emergency.

(CFR: 45.13)

IMPORTANCE RO 2.0 SRO 3.5 2.4.38 Ability to take actions called for in the facility emergency plan / including (if required)supporting or acting as emergency coordinator.

(CFR: 43.5 / 45.11)

IMPORTANCE RO 2.2 SRO 4.0 2.4.39 Knowledge of the RO's responsibilities in emergency plan implementation.

(CFR: 45.11)

IMPORTANCE RO 3.3 SRO 3.1 2.4.40 Knowledge of the SRO's responsibilities in emergency plan implementation.

(CFR: 45.11)

IMPORTANCE RO 2.3 SRO 4.0 2.4.41 Knowledge of the emergency action level thresholds and classifications.

(CFR: 43.5 / 45.11)

IMPORTANCE RO 2.3 SRO 4.1 NUREG-1123.

Rev.

2 2-14

RECENT LESSONS LEARNED SRO-only Questions (Cont'd)

SRO-only questions will be based on 0

following categories: A.2, G2.1, G2.2, G2.3, and G2.4.

differences between SRO and RO outlines shifts only 11 K/As from Tier 2 to Tiers 1 & 3.

-Other 14 flexible.'

6

ES-401 BWR SRO Examination Outline Form ES-401-1 Facility:

Date of Exam:

Exam Level:

K/A Category Points Tier Group Point J_

KJK K K K K A A A AG Total S1 2

3 4

5 6

1 2

3 4

1.

1 26 Emergency &

Abnormal 2

17 Plant Evolutions Tier 43

+7 Totals 1

23

2.

2 13 Plant Systems 3

4 Tier 40 Totals

3. Generic Knowledge and Cat I Cat 2 Cat 3 Cat 4 Abilities 17

+

Note: -

Attempt to distribute topics among all K/A categories; select at least one topic from every K/A category within each tier.

Actual point totals must match those specified in the table.

Select topics from many systems; avoid selecting more than two or three K/A topics from a given system unless they relate to plant-specific priorities.

Systems/evolutions within each group are identified on the associated outline.

The shaded areas are not applicable to the category/tier.

NUREG-1021 10 of 39 Interim Rev. 8, January 1997

ES-401 BWR RO Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Facility:

Date of Exam:

Exam Level:

K/A Category Points Tier Group A A G Point

K K K

KK K A A A A G Total 1

2 3

4 5

6 3

4 1

21 Emergency &

1 Abnormal

2.

Plant 3

4 Evolutions Tier T~er 36 Totals 1

28

2.

Plant Systems 3

4 Tier 51 Totals

3.

Generic Knowledge and Cat I Cat 2 Cat 3 Cat 4 Abilities 13 Note: -

Attempt to distribute topics among all K/A categories; select at least one topic from every K/A category within each tier.

Actual point totals must match those specified in the table..

Select topics from many systems; avoid selecting more than two or three K/A topics from a given system unless they relate to plant-specific priorities.

Systems/evolutions within each group are identified on the associated outline.

The shaded areas are not applicable to the category/tier.

NUREG-1021 16 of 39 Interim Rev. 8,. January 1997

RECENT LESSONS LEARNED Sampling Criteria intent of process is to avoid exam predictability.

also to avoid excessive use of repeat test items.

first use systematic process to develop sample plan using topics from K/A catalog, then use facility question resources to accomplish the plan.

ES-401 EWR SRO Examination Outline Emergery ad Abno mal Plant Evolutions Tier Group ES-401-1 E/APE # / Nnm

/ Safety Function K

K K

A A

G 1

2 3

1 2

K/A

_Topic(s)Imp.Points 295003 Partial or Complete Loss of AC Pwr / VI 295006 SCRAM / I 295007 High Reactor Pressure / III 295009 Low Reactor Water Level II 295010 High Drywall Pressure / V 295013 High Suppression Pool Temp. I V 295014 Inadvertent Reactivity Addition I 295015 Incomplete SCRAM / I 295016 Control Room Abandonment / VII 295017 High Off-site Release Rate / IX 295023 Refueling Accidents Cooling Mode I VIII 295024 High Drywall Pressure I V 295025 High Reactor Pressure / Ill 295026 Suppression Pool High Water Temp. ( V 295027 High Containment Temperature / V 295030 Low Suppression Pool Water Level I V 295031 Reactor Low Water Level / I1 295037 SCRAM Condition Present and Power Above APRM Downscale or Unknown /I 295038 High Off-site Release Rate / IX 500000 High Containment Hydrogen Conc. / V K/A Category Totals:

pGrou Point Total:

NUREG-1021 11 of 39 Interim Rev. 8, January 1997

RECENT LESSONS LEARNED Sampling Criteria (Cont'd) each topic in each tier & group should be sampled at least once unless insufficient questions exist to do this. If all topics have been sampled once and other questions need to be selected, the process should be systematic and unbiased.

final sample plan should have a fairly even balance across all Ks & As.

RECENT LESSONS LEARNED Sampling Criteria (Cont'd) up to 25 questions from last two NRC exams, facility licensee exams, tests & quizzes (except final audit test) may be used.

Chief Examiner (CE) has the option to unilaterally shift or change the selected K/As.

up to 5 site-specific priorities may be identified with CE concurrence (K/A value may be < 2.5 with sufficient justification).

OTHER Record Keeping per 10 CFR 55 are required to provide evidence that the applicant has successfully completed the facility licensee's requirements to be licensed as an operator.

this includes successful manipulation of the controls of their facility. As a minimum, 5 significant control manipulations which affect reactivity or power level.

1 0

OTHER Record Keeping (Cont'd) this information should be retained and available for inspection from time of license application to license expiration.

OTHER Requal Control Manipulations if have program based on SAT process, list in 10 CFR 55.59(c)(3) does not need to be strictly followed.

should have something similar based on plant JTA and specific plant priorities.

some manipulations are individual operator oriented, most would be team oriented.

12

OTHER Requal Control Manipulations (Cont'd) credit for accomplishment should only be given for active participation in the manipulation.

NOTE: control manipulations are not synonymous with reactivity manipulations.

13

Examination Communications Examination Development Coordination By Ronald F. Aiello

Facility Suggested Improvements

1. The exam development team and lead examiner should meet at the beginning of the development process to establish common grounds for the development and execution of the examination:

Changes and interpretations to the NUREG.

Scope of the exam development and administration process.

Lessons learned from the last exam administered.

2. Move due dates for the outline and the exam back to 90 and 60 days prior to prep week. This will provide more time for examination review by the examiner(s).

3. SSNTA continue with efforts to standardize document formats for examination tools (JPMs and scenarios).

4. Examiners maintain a list of who (plant) does the exam process the best. This should probably be broken down to each portion of the examination., Provide your ratings to the utilities in Region 2, so we can meet your expectations and improve.

5. The principal and the utility representative should meet early to establish a working relationship and expectations. If possible this should include samples of questions, JPMs, etc.

6. The exam should have no outstanding issues/questions that arise and need repair at the last minute. These issues should all have been identified by the prep week, to allow time to make changes that meet all the criteria.

7. The chief examiner should explain up front all the forms in 1021 that need to be completed.

8. Always check on badging prior to coming on site.

9. As soon as a Chief Examiner is assigned to an exam, the Facility Rep and the Chief should verify the ability to communicate via all channels (including e-mail). When we converted to Lotus Notes, the facility was suddenly unable to send e-mail to his Chief Examiner. This

became somewhat of a hindrance and should be avoided if possible.

10. It would be helpful if the Chief Examiner could provide his schedule to the Facility Rep. This includes providing updates for any changes to the Chief Examiner's schedule along the way. The facility rep needs to be aware of when the Chief Examiner is available to assist in exam preparation activities.

11. A face-to-face meeting should be promptly scheduled in order for the Chief to communicate his expectations to the Facility Rep. The face-to-face requirement could be waived if the Chief and the Facility Rep have previously worked together and the Facility Rep is confident that he/she understands the Chief's expectations. In any case, a

conference call would be the minimum to satisfy this important first step.

12. The Chief and the Facility Rep should work together to establish a firm schedule for the exam week(s). This will ensure the most efficient schedule is developed (with respect to crew composition and personnel movement) to minimize the amount of exam material required.

13. The Chief Examiner and Utility Rep MUST remain fixed during the entire 180 day period. Handing off the responsibility is both disruptive and destructive to communication. The expectations of the chief examiner must be defined/communicated early.

14. The "timeline" must be enhanced to identify specific times and dates for communication/working meetings between

the examiner and the utility rep. These meetings should be "face to face" to assure expectations are understood, and being met, early on.

15. If an examiner and a utility rep have not worked together before, the timeline for "deliverables" must be expanded.

Working meetings (face to face) must be established for the examiner to review 5-10 questions, 1 scenario, 1 jpm, 5 jpm knowledge questions, 5 admin questions, etc. to assure that the standards and expectations are clear early in the process and that the utility can produce a product that meets the expectation.

16. 398 and 396 forms need to be available electronically. We took the time to develop an electronic version ourselves but I would prefer that the electronic master copies came directly from the NRC

so that we have more confidence that everything is exactly the same. We would all benefit from this improvement.

17. A face to face working meeting of eight (8) to twelve (12) hours, approximately two (2) weeks before the thirty (30) day submittal must be established to resolve any issues BEFORE the submittal. The exam materials should be reviewed, line by line, at this meeting to communicate all changes necessary.

18. Expectations must be established early so that the utility clearly understands the rules and the examiners expectations. Small samples of development must be reviewed early to assure expectations are being met.

A face to face meeting, prior to the 30 day submittal, to resolve any/all issues must be scheduled such that adequate time (suggest 2 weeks) is available to resolve

comments before the 30 day limit. No one wants to see 30 questions reviewed and the exam rejected. Spending ~24 hours in 3-4 face to face meetings is a small/smart price to pay to avoid hundreds of hours of re-development, the emotional stress on candidates when the exam must be rescheduled and the impact on the plant when candidates' are not licensed to meet plant needs.

19. The "new" SSNTA format for JPM level of detail is NOT what you have liked in the past and needs to be either accepted by the NRC as a standard or optimum format, or modified, or rejected. The JPMs we submitted to you were in the format and level of detail you had found acceptable in the past, and we were surprised to find that they needed significant last-minute rework (additional level of detail).

20. Maybe Chief Examiners could send some copies of good written questions, JPMs, and JPM questions up front that could help a new developer survive the exam writing process and see where you as an examiner are coming from.

Facility General Comments

1. The limited number of NRC license examiners puts the Region and the sites at a disadvantage with respect to getting timely interchange. If the examiner is out of the office on a trip for several weeks, the time you have to provide the licensee with feedback is very limited and results in a real struggle to ensure a quality exam.

The limited resources and interaction time increases the risk of lower quality.

2. Region II examiners have been very prompt in getting back to us when we have a question even though you may be at a remote location.

3. The quality of the communications has been good. All of the examiners that I have talked to have been thorough, precise and have performed listening checks to

verify that the correct messages were sent and received. I would however, like to see more communications by e-mail where appropriate. That would help ensure the clarity of the communications even more.

4 With respect to the exam specifically; there were a number of changes that were made and we had to transmit those by expensive overnight or next day delivery. If we could figure out a secure e-mail method it would save all of us numerous headaches as well as dollars.

5. During my first face-to-face meeting with the Chief Examiner (to review draft exam material), I gained much-needed insight into his expectations. This alleviated much stress on my part and, from then on, the process went much more smoothly. The Chief was very helpful during subsequent telephone conversations and our second

meeting in Atlanta. He was very easy to work with and very understanding concerning my inexperience in this process. His patient guidance was the key

-to our success in this endeavor. Next time, with all we've learned, well do even better.

6. The biggest problem that I encountered during that exam came from the written portion that was being developed by the contractor. Since he had written exams before, I assumed that the quality of questions he was submitting to us were the quality of questions that were acceptable to the NRC. We reviewed his work, made technical corrections and assumed that the questions would be accepted by the NRC.

I had very little communication with the NRC on the subject of the written exam and a great deal of communication on the subject of the operating exam. When the submittal was finally made, the focus went

to the written exam and most of the communication was made over speaker phones (about 40 hours4.62963e-4 days <br />0.0111 hours <br />6.613757e-5 weeks <br />1.522e-5 months <br />). It became a very painful process and could have been avoided had I not put so much faith in the contractor's exam writing experience and communicated more on the subject of the written exam with the chief. We had a 100% pass rate on the exam, but the exam report was brutal in the area of the written exam.

7. Know the chief examiners expectations from the beginning (prior to any development).

8. Never assume you know what you're doing

- the chief is just a phone call away.

9. It's better to deliver material and review it in person rather than over the phone. I plan for four or five trips between the start of

development and prep week. It may sound like overkill, but it works (It's also safer in the area of security).

10. -Submit material early (especially the written). I like to have the written exam a done deal prior to the actual submittal date.

11. You can never talk to the Chief Examiner too much. During the process, I talk to him more than I talk to my mother.

12. The bottom line is that frequent communication, personal contact, and early submittal of materials is the key to a successful NRC exam.

13. ALL problems/changes must be resolved at the level of the examiner and the utility rep. In no case should problems/changes be reported/escalated to senior management of the utility or NRC unless

both the examiner and the utility rep are at an absolute, and mutually agreed, impasse.

14. We often felt that we were working in the dark, writing questions on topics you may not want (as we were waiting for comment on our skyscrapers), possibly wasting resources, but seeing no other option to meet our required cast-in-stone deadlines.

15. It's difficult to keep JPMs short and plausible at the same time.

16. What is a good "admin JPM", especially for ROs?

yuesiiuli:

I The unit is operating at 20% power with all systems in automatic. Bank D' control rods are at 120 steps. Control Bank 'C' rod H6 drops to the bottom of the core. No rod control urgent failure alarms occur.

Where will thermal power and RCS Tavg stabilize in response to the dropped rod without any operator action?

A.

Reactor thermal power will be lower than prior to the dropped rod; RCS Tavg will be more than 50F lower than the temperature prior to the dropped rod.

B.

Reactor thermal power will be lower than prior to the dropped rod; RCS Tavg will be within loF of the temperature prior to the dropped rod.

C.

Reactor thermal power will be the same as prior to the dropped rod; RCS Tavg will be within loF of the temperature prior to the dropped rod.

D.

Reactor thermal power will be the same as prior to the dropped rod; RCS Tavg will be more than 5'F lower than the temperature prior to the dropped rod.

Answer:

C Reactor thermal power will be the same as prior to the dropped rod; RCS Tavg will be within loF of the temperature prior to the dropped rod.

Reterence Page SRO Ouestion 10 RO Ouestion 10 SRO Tier/Group 1/1 RO Tier/Group 1/2 SRO Importance 3.7 RO Importance 3.2 10CFR55.43(b)

IOCFR55.41 8

Item Addressed Item Addressed KA Number 000003AK1.01 KA Statement Knowledge of the operational implications of the following concepts as they apply to Dropped Control Rod: Reason for turbine following reactor on dropped rod event SHNPP Objective AOP-LP-3.1-2 RECOGNIZE automatic actions that are associated with AOP-001, Malfunction of Rod Control and Indication Systems References AOP-LP-3. 1 AOP-001 AOP-001 Malfunction of Rod Control and Indication Systems SD-104 Rod Control System Question Source New Justification (A) Select if he does not recognize that rods will step out to restore temperature and power was restored due to the previous decrease in temperature.

(B) Select if he recognizes that rods will step out, but the decreased temperature adds positive reactivity to restore power.

(C) CORRECT - Power will initially decrease du'e to the dropped rod. As power decreases, temperature will decrease. As temperature decreases, positive reactivity is added -to restore power. Bank D rods in auto will cause rods to step out. Rods stepping out will restore power and temperature to the original value.

(D) Select if he recognizes that power was restored due to the previous decrease in temperature, but does not recognize that rods will step out to restore temperature and

INITIAL EXAMINATIONS QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS TRAINING MANAGERS CONFERENCE NOVEMBER 5, 1998 RICK BALDWIN GEORGE HOPPER

Initial Written Examinations

Reference:

All written examinations are written IAW ES-401, "Preparation of Site-Specific Written Examinations for Power Reactors." Using ES-401-1, ES-401-2, ES 401-3, ES-401-4, BWR/PWR, RO/SRO EXAMINATION OUTLINES, and ES-401-6 Written Examination Quality Assurance Checkoff Sheet.'

2

OBJECTIVES

• BETTER EXAMINATION PRODUCT

• LESS NRC/FACILITY REWORK

• SHARED EXPECTATIONS 3

SESSION OBJECTIVE:

To review validity concepts affecting the NRC written examination for the purpose of:

Instructing licensee personnel toward construction of more VALID and CONSISTENT NRC license examinations.

4

COVERAGE

• 3 Levels of Validity

• 3 Levels of Knowledge

• Discrimination, Sampling

• Psychometrics 5

VALIDITY A valid test is one which tests what it intends to test.

In training examinations, testing specific skills and knowledge outlined and taught in the objectives.

In licensing examinations, testing specific skills and knowledge that SHOULD have been outlined in the objectives.

6

3 LEVELS OF VALIDITY

• Content

• Operational

• Discriminant 7

CONTENT VALIDITY Addresses K/A coverage and sampling plan coverage.

OPERATIONAL VALIDITY Addresses two aspects:

1. Is the test item important to be known as a part of the operator's job?

2. Does the test item require the candidate to perform a job RELATED mental or physical operation?

DISCRIMINANT VALIDITY Addresses:

• The cut score is the performance level that we use for making a pass/fail decision 80 percent.

• The exam must be written at a level of difficulty that intends to discriminate at the 80 percent level.

• The question, its stem and distractor, interplay, by DESIGN, at least 80 percent of the candidates taking the exam should answer the item correctly.

10

VALIDITY

SUMMARY

1. The exam must be content valid, encompassing job safety significance and sampling.

2. The test item should be operationally oriented: a expected mental or psychomotor requirement of the job. The items should be written at the comprehension or analysis level vice simple memory. Items that measure problem solving, prediction, analysis which are essential to job performance.

VALIDITY

SUMMARY

3. The exam must discriminate at a moderate level of difficulty, set by the cut score.

Meaning the test items as written should provide opportunity for at least 80 percent of the candidates taking the test should answer the item correctly.

12

3 LEVELS OF KNOWLEDGE Bloom's Taxonomy

• Analysis, Application, Synthesis

• Comprehension

• Fundamental (simple memory) 13

LEVEL OF KNOWLEDGE

• Bloom's Taxonomy, NRC Reference Benchmark to classify levels of knowledge.

• Bloom's Taxonomy, a classification scheme that classifies items by depth of mental performance required to answer the items.

• Bloom's Taxonomy, can be applied to written, scenarios or JPM questions.

14

LEVELS LEVEL 1 Fundamental, using simple mental processes, recall or recognition of discrete bits of information.

i.e. setpoints, definitions, or specific facts.

15

LEVEL 2 Comprehension, involves understanding material through relating it to its own parts or other material:

i.e. including rephrasing information in different words, recognizing relationships

,including consequences or implications.

16

LEVEL 3 Analysis, synthesis, and application testing is more active and product-oriented testing which involves the multi-part mental process of assembling, sorting, or integrating the parts so that the whole, and the sum can be used to: predict and event or outcome, solve a problem or create something new.

i.e. using knowledge to solve problems.

17

DETERMINANTS OF DISCRIMINATION

• Level of examination knowledge

• Level of examination difficulty

• Passing Score

• Item bank use 18

NATURE OF EXAMINATIONS AND TESTS

• TESTS are samples of PERFORMANCE

• Infer overall performance based on a sample

• Sample must be broad-based to make confident inference

• Sample must NOT be fully predictable or inferences cannot be made on untested areas.

• Items MUST discriminate otherwise it has little or NO value.

19

PSYCHOMETRICS Items may have one or more of the following psychometric errors:

1. Low level of knowledge (fundamental)

2. Low operational validity (not job related)

3. Low discriminatory validity ( hard or easy)

4. Implausible distractors

5. Confusing language or ambiguous questions

6. Confusing or inappropriate negatives

7. Collection of true/false statements

8. Backwards logic 20

006 Emergency Core.Cooling System 7/ JPM 136 Recovery From Safety injection

-and Solid Water-Conditions Question 2:

Given the following plant conditions:

Unit 2 was operating at 100% power.

The plant experienced a large break LOCA with a failure of the ECCS system.

FR-C. 1, "Response to Inadequate Core Cooling," is being implemented.

Core exit TCs are 720'F and increasing.

At this point FR-C. I directs the crew to depressurize intact steam generators.

a.) What is the basis for the direction in FR-C. I to depressurize intact steam generators?

b.) Why is this action taken?

References Allowed? YES X

NO Answer:

a?) To reduce RCS pressure below 125 psig b.) To allow the ECCS accumulators and RHR pumps to inject water to the RCS.

Reference:

KA: 006G4. 18 [2.7 / 3.6] Knowledge of specific bases for EOPs.

OPL271C398 pg 12-15 Applicant Response:

SAT UNSAT

026 Containment Spray System / JPM ' 57AP Respond to High Containment Pressure,Yilace RHR Spray in Service Question 2:

Given the following plant conditions:

Unit I has tripped from 100% power due to a LOCA.

Containment pressure is 3.0 psid Transfer of Containment Spray pump suction to the containment sump is being performed in accordance with ES-1.3, Transfer to RHR Containment Sump.

a.) Why must both CS pumps be placed in PULL-TO-Lock while transferring suction to the containment sump?

b.) What does placing both CS pumps in PULL-TO-Lock prevent?

References Allowed? YES X

NO Answer:

a.) While shifting to the containment sump, both the RWST and the containment sump suction valves to the CS pumps will be closed at the same time.

b.) Placing the CS pumps in PULL-TO-Lock will prevent running a CS pump without a source of water.

Reference:

K/A: 026G4.18 [ 2.7 / 3.6 ] Knowledge of specific bases for EOPs OPL271C024 pg 14-18, CCD NO: 1-47W611-72-1, ES-L.3, pages 11-13, OPL271C388 pg 9 Applicant Response:

SAT UNSAT

License Applican dministrative Walkthrough Exe ination--NRC-1 Examiner Sheet A.1:Shift Staffing Question 1:

A licensed RO has been off-shift for 6 months to assist in outage scheduling. He is informed that he is needed to join a shift crew in 2 weeks to fill in for a vacationing shift RO.

He had a satisfactory physical examination 18 months, ago and has maintained satisfactory performance in the licensed operator requalification training program. In anticipation of rejoining a shift crew, the RO has spent two 8-hour shifts in the control room as the OATC during the past month under the direction of a shift RO.

What additional requirements must be met by the RO before he may fill in for the vacationing RO?

References Allowed? YES X NO Answer:

The RO must complete an additional 24 (40 - 16) hours of "under direction" on shift time that must include a plant tour and shift turnover.

Reference:

SSP-12.1, Conduct of Operations, p. 61 and 62 K/A 2.1.4 (2.3/3.4)

Applicant Response:

SAT UNSAT

Reactor Operator Examination

65.

Given the following conditions:

• The reactor has experienced a Steam Generator Tube Rupture.

• All systems responded as expected.

• The perfbrmance of EOP-04 is in progress.

• One steam generator has been isolated.

• RCS cooldown using natural circulation is in progress.

Which ONE of the following describes the concern associated with the affected SG pressure prior to placing the RCS on SDC?

a.

The SG pressure would be too low due to excessive cooldown causing RCS water to enter the SG and reducing RCS inventory.

b.

The SG pressure would be slightly less than RCS pressure causing water to enter the RCS resulting in a dilution.

c.

The SG temperature would be too high to allow for SG depressurization.

d.

The SG pressure would be too high due to thermal stratification of the secondary water.

19.

Which ONE of the following describes the response of the Unit-I charging pumps following receipt of an automatic SIAS signal, coincident with a Loss of Offsite Power? Assume normal electrical lineup and all equipment is operable.

a.

Only one charging pump is automatically started on each emergency bus 5 minutes after it is energized by the diesel.

b.

All charging pumps are automatically started immediately after their respective bus is energized by the diesel.

c.

All charging pumps are automatically started 5 minutes after their respective buses are energized by the diesel.

d.

Only one charging pump is automatically started onto each emergency bus immediately after it is energized by the diesel.

Reactor Operator Examination

27.

Charging pumps are running on Unit 1 and an SIAS is present. (Assume no operator action)

Which ONE of the following lists the charging pump response when the BAM tanks are emptied?

The charging pumps will:

a.

trip on thermal overload.

b.

trip on low suction pressure.

c.

automatically align to the RWT.

d.

continue to run and become gas bound.

Reactor Operator Examination

59.

Given the following conditions:

• Unit 1 CEDM fan HVE-21A is in AUTO after START.

• Unit 1 CEDM fan HVE-21B is in AUTO after STOP.

• Unit 1 CEDM fan HVE-21A trips on overcurrent.

Which ONE of the following lists the signals required by the logic needed to start HVE-21B?

a.

The trip signal from HVE-21A.

b.

The trip signal from HVE-21A concurrent with a low flow signal.

c.

A low flow signal.

d.

The trip signal from HVE-21A concurrent with a low flow signal and air inlet temperature signal to the cooling coils is greater than 100 0 F.

13.

Given the following plant conditions:

Unit.1 was at 73% power A reactor trip/safety injection on low steam line pressure occurred 21 minutes ago Average Core Exit TC temperature is_3-75 F RCS pressure is_2265psig 1350 All SIG pressures are DECREASING slowly 2 and '3 SIG levels are 5% NR and DECREASING slowly

-1 SIG level is 6% NR, and INCREASING slowly

1. 4 S/G level is STEADY at 2% NR Total feedwatercflow is 340 gpm PZR level is%

and INCREASING RCS T-cold temperature is 325OF and DECREASING slowly Containment pressure is 5 psid and INCREASING slowly At this point, which ONE of the following Critical Safety Functions is the MOST degraded?

a. Heat Sink

b. Core Cooling

c.

Containment

d. Pressurized Thermal Shock Answer:

A K/A:

000040K101 (4.1/4.4]

Reference:

E-0, Foldout Page Objective:

OPL271C395, B.1 Level:

Analysis

)

Source:

000040K101 001 History:

Stem and distracters a and d modified (7/79B)

Note:

Provide PTS curve with this question.

Justification:

a.

Correct answer because all SIG levels are Jess than 10% NR and total feedwater flow is less than 40 gpm.

b.

Incorrect because RCS temperature is 325-F (core exit TICs less than 1200 F).

c.

Incorrect because containment oressure is less than 12.0 psid.

d. Incorrect because RCS temoerature is 325"F (T-Eoid is greater than 250^)

20.

Given the foowing plant conditions:

The control room has been evacuated due to a fire All controls have been transferred per AOP-C.04 MDAFW pumps 1 A-A and 1 B-B are injecting into the steam generators The TDAFW pump has been shut down Steam generator pressures and levels are decreasing Which ONE of the following describes the espeasz u uF eap yedwaterystem?

a. The TDAFW pump will automatically restart when 2/4 steam generators reach low low level.

f~~U'J

b. The MDAFVW pump level control valves will automatically control steam generator levels at 33%.

The MDAFW pump level control valves will have to be manually adjusted using the Manual Output Adjust in the L-381 cabinet.

d. The discharge pressure for the MDAFWpurnps will have to be manually adjusted by.

throttling the manual valves at the LCVs.

Answer:

B K/A:

000068A102 (4.3 /4.5]

Reference:

AOP-C.04, page 11 Objective:

OPL271C423, B.4 Level:

Comprehension Source:

__._000058A102 001 History:

Used on 9197 RO NRC exam Text modified to correct grammar errors. Distracters a, b, c, and d reordered (7122198). Distracter be restructured (7/29/98)

Note:

Selected frnmm exam bank with minor modification of text

INADEQUATE CORE COOLING FR-C.1 Rev. 8 ACTION/EXPECTED RESPONSE RESPONSE NOT OBTAINED CAUTION Use of a Faulted or Ruptured S/G during performance of the following steps may compound the emergency situation. When NO intact S/Gs are available, a Faulted or Ruptured S/G may be used.

12. MAINTAIN Intact S/G narrow range levels:

a. Greater than 10% (25% ADV]

a. MAINTAIN total feed flow greater than 440 gpm UNTIL level greater than 10% (25% ADV]

in at least one S/G.

IF total feed flow greater than 440 gpm can NOT be established, THEN PERFORM the-following:

1) CONTINUE attempts to establish heat sink in at least one S/G.

2) GOTO Note priorto Step 21.

b. Between 10% 125% ADV] and 50%.

Page 10 of 19

23.

Given the following plant conditions:

FR-C.1, 'inadequate Core Cooling", has been entered due to a RED path on Core Cooling Core exit temperatures (TCs) are 1250'F and increasing NO Feedwater / Aux Feedwater is available At step 12, the CRO checks the S/G NR levels and reports all are <10%.

As the SRO you should: (Select ONE of the following)

a. Go to FR-H.1, "Loss of Secondary Heat Sink".

b. Depressurize all intact S/Gs to atmospheric pressure to dump accumulators.

c. Start RCPs one at a lime, until core exit TCs are less than 1200^F.

d. -- repare-iate-ReSeethmd-Bleeif-WR-leveHrt-any-2-S/Gs-is-ess-thart-e6%-

Answer:

C, K/A:

000074K307

[4.0/4.4]

Reference:

FR-C.1, pages 10 & 17 Objective:

OPL271 C398 Level:

Comprehension Source:

000074K307 001 History:

Used on HLC 9807 practice exam Distracters b and c reordered Note:

Selectedrom Iexam bank without modification of text

'7

49.

Given the following plant conditions:

Reactor power is at 20% during a unit shutdown Intermediate Range N-36 failed high Pemyeassposiev Which ONE of the following describes the effect of this failure and action during the remainder of the shutdown?

a. The reactor will automatically trip when the Power Range channels decrease below the P-10 setpoint.

b. Entry from Mode 1 to Mode 2 is prohibited with an inoperable Intermediate Range channel, so the unit must be manually tripped prior to Mode 2 entry.

c. Both Source Range channels, N-31 and N-32, must be manually energized when the operable Intermediate Range channel (N-35) decreases below the P-6 setpoint.

d. Source Range channel N-32 must be manually energized when the ooerable Intermediate Range channel (N-35) decreases below the P-6 setpoint; Source Range channel N-31 will automatically energize.

Answer.

C K/A:

015000K407

[3.7/3.8]

Reference:

AOP-L-01, page 10 ES-0.1, page 13 Objective:

OPL271C352, B.4 Level:

Comprehension Source:

015000K407 001 History:

Not used on 9/97 or 5/98 NRC exams. Not used on practice exam.

Distrazters c and d reordered Note:

Selected fro om exam bank without modification of text

• ~

c~~

6 2d'~~S

-21)

V7

50.

Given the following plant conditions:

Large Break LOCA is in progress RCS pressure is 550 psig Exosensor indicates 25OF superheat No RCPs are operating Which ONE of the following indications would the operator use along with RCS pressure to accurately substantiate core cooling?

a. Reactor Coolant Tavg value.

b. Average value of all core exit thermocouples.

c. Hottest Reactor Coolant wide range Thot value.

d. Average value of five hottest core exit thermocouples.

Answer:

D K/A 017000A402

[3.8 /4.1]

Reference:

FR-0, page 3 OPL271C044, page 7, A.1.c Objective:

OPL271C044, B.1.b Level:

Memory Source:

017000A402 001 History:

Used on HLC 9809 practice exam Distracters a, b, c, and d reordered (7/22/98)

Note:

Selected from i

nexam bank without modification of text

Core Cooling SQN F-0.2 FR-0 page 3ofll1 Rev. 11 (See Note 1)

No COHE EXIT T/ca LESS THAN 1200F YES ttQILL

[ED PATH IlEQUIRES AT LEAST S T/Co GnEATERn THAN THE

~

n CHEATN THA IlIECOflE EXIT T/Cs APPLICABLE LIMIT LESS T AS SOLLOWS:

C EXOSENSOn T/CXI NO GO TO ONE TC NEAn-C.

CONE CENTEn AND n A n T1 N 40/!E HOESTYES GO TO LAcI IJADnANTGOT AS DVEEnMINED N

13Y I IE STA).

AT EAS ON YES

• 1I DYAI EXOSNSO T/CG G T ION T/C21GO TO O CS SLICOOLING NO A BASED ON CONE EXIT TGCO GHEATE1R THAN 40*r YES a 4m a mm a M.

G CS SAT YES ----

G O T

3/4.5 EMERGENCY CORE COOLING SYSTEMS 3/4.5.1 ACCUMULATORS COLD LEG TNJECTION ACCUMULATORS LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3.5.].1 Each cold leg injection accumulator shall be OPERABLE with:

a. The isolation valve open,

b. A contained borated water volume of between 7615 and 8094 gallons of R131 borated water,

c. Between 2400 and 2700 ppm of boron,

d. A nitrogen cover-pressure of batween 600 and 683 psig, and

e.

Power removed from isolation valve when RCS pressure is above R184 2000 psig.

APPLICABILITY: MODES 1, 2 and 3.*

ACTION:

a. With one cold leg injection accumulator inoperable, except as a result of boron concentration not within limits, restore the inoperable accumulator to OPERABLE status within one hour or be in at least HOT STANDBY within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and reduce pressurizer pressure.to 1000 psig or less within the following 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />.

b.

With one cold leg injection accumulator inoperable due to the boron concentration not within limits, restore boron concentration to within.limits'-within 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> or be in at least HOT STANDBY within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and reduce pressurizer pressure to 1000 psig or less within the following 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />.

• Pressurizer pressure above 1000 psig.

Decefber 27, 1994 U IT 2 3/4 5-1 Amendment No.

113, 131,

133, 141, 134

006 Emergency Core Cooling System / JPM 136 Recovery From SafetyInjection and Solid Water Conditions Question 2:

Given the following plant conditions:

Unit 2 was operating at 100% power.

The plant experienced a large break LOCA with a failure of the ECCS system.

FR-C.1, "Response to Inadequate Core Cooling," is being implemented.

Core exit TCs are 720'F and increasing.

At this point FR-C.1 directs the crew to depressurize intact steam generators.

a.) What is the basis for the direction in FR-C. I to depressurize intact steam generators?

b.) Why is this action taken?

References Allowed? YES X

NO Answer:

a.) To reduce RCS pressure below 125 psig b.) To allow the ECCS accumulators and RHR pumps to inject water to the RCS.

Reference:

KA: 006G4.18 [ 2.7 / 3.6 ] Knowledge of specific bases for EOPs.

OPL271C398 pg 12-15 Applicant Response:

SAT_ UNSAT

.026 Containment Spray System /, JPM 57AP Respond to High Containment

.Pressure,TPlace RHR Spray in Service Question 2:

Given the following plant conditions:

Unit I has tripped from 100% power due to a LOCA.

Containment pressure is 3.0 psid Transfer of Containment Spray pump suction to the containment sump is being performed in accordance with ES-1.3, Transfer to RHR Containment Sump.

a.) Why must both CS pumps be placed in PULL-TO:Lock while transferring suction to the containment sump?

b.) What does placing both CS pumps in PULL-TO-Lock prevent?

References Allowed? YES X

NO Answer:

a.) While shifting to the containment sump, both the RWST and the containment sump suction valves to the CS pumps will be closed at the same time.

b.) Placing the CS pumps in PULL-TO-Lock will prevent running a CS pump without a source of water.

Reference:

K/A: 026G4.18 [ 2.7 / 3.6 ] Knowledge of specific bases for EOPs OPL271C024 pg 14-18, CCD NO: 1-47W611-72-1, ES-1.3, pages 11-13, OPL271C388 pg 9 Applicant Response:

SAT UNSAT

License Applica dministrative Walkthrough E intion--NRC-1 Examiner Sheet l:Shift: Staf in g....

Question 1:

A licensed RO has been off-shift for 6 months to assist in outage scheduling. He is informed that he is needed to join a shift crew in 2 weeks to fill in for a vacationing shift RO.

He had a satisfactory physical examination 18 months ago and has maintained satisfactory performance in the licensed operator requalification training program. In anticipation of rejoining a shift crew, the RO has spent two 8-hour shifts in the control room as the OATC during the past month under the direction of a shift RO.

What additional requirements must be met by the RO before he may fill in for the vacationing RO?

References Allowed? YES X NO Answer:

The RO must complete an additional 24 (40 - 16) hours of "under direction" on shift time that must include a plant tour and shift turnover.

Reference:

SSP-12.1, Conduct of Operations, p. 61 and 62 K/A 2.1.4 (2.3/3.4)

Applicant. Response:

SAT UNSAT