ML15261A188
| ML15261A188 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oconee  |
| Issue date: | 06/03/1998 |
| From: | Casto C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | Mccollum W DUKE POWER CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9806160252 | |
| Download: ML15261A188 (2) | |
Text
June 3, 1998 Duke Energy Corporation ATTN: Mr. W. R. McCollum Vice President Oconee Nuclear Station P. 0. Box 1439 Seneca, SC 29679
SUBJECT:
MEETING
SUMMARY
- OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION
Dear Mr. McCollum:
This refers to the meeting conducted by mutual request at the Oconee Nuclear Station on May 15, 1998, to discuss the status of plant performance issues.
Enclosed are a list of attendees and your presentation handouts.
It is our opinion that this meeting was beneficial in that it provided the NRC staff with a better understanding of Oconee Nuclear Station performance and your ongoing initiatives.
In accordance with Section 2.790(a) of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter and its enclosures will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.
Should you have any questions concerning this meeting, please contact Mr. R. E. Carroll at (404) 562-4511.
Sincerely, Original signed by:
Charles A. Casto Deputy Director Division of Reactor Projects Docket Nos. 50-269, 50-270, and 50-287 License Nos. DPR-38, DPR-47, and DPR-55
Enclosures:
- 1.
List of Attendees
- 2.
Licensee Presentation Handouts cc w/encls:
(See page 2) 9806160252 980603 PDR ADOCK 05000269 P
DPC 2
cc w/encls:
cc w/encls cont'd:
Mr. J. E. Burchfield Manager. LIS Compliance NUS Corporation Duke Power Company 2650 McCormick Drive P. 0. Box 1439 Clearwater, FL 34619-1035 Seneca, SC 29679 Mr. G. A. Copp Mr. Paul R. Newton Licensing - E050 Legal Department (PB05E)
Duke Energy Corporation Duke Energy Corporation P. 0. Box 1007 422 South Church Street Charlotte, NC 28201-1007 Charlotte. NC 28242-0001 Ms. Karen E. Long Mr. Robert P. Gruber Assistant Attorney General Executive Director N. C. Department of Justice Public Staff - NCUC P. 0. Box 629 P. 0. Box 29520 Raleigh, NC 27602 Raleigh, NC 27626-0520 Distribution w/encls:
Mr. Robert B. Borsum D. LaBarge, NRR Framatome Technologies H. Berkow, NRR 1700 Rockville Pike, Suite 525 R. Carroll, RII Rockville, MD 20852 C. Ogle, RII C. Casto, RII Mr. J. Michael McGarry, III, Esq.
M. Thomas. RII Winston and Strawn C. Payne, RII 1400 L Street, NW M. Tschiltz, NRR Washington, D. C. 20005 PUBLIC NRC Resident Inspector Mr. Mel Fry, Acting Director Division of Radiation Protection N. C. Department of Environmental Commerce & Natural Resources 3825 Barrett Drive Raleigh, NC 27609-7721 Mr. Max Batavia, Chief Bureau of Radiological Health South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control 2600 Bull Street Columbia, SC 29201 County Supervisor of Oconee County Walhalla, SC 29621 I
FICE RII:D RII:DRP SIGNATURE NAME Ca oLL COgle DATE tl4 198 5/198 5/
/98 5/
/98 5/
/98 5/
/98 5/
/98 DAT E NO rYE NO YES
/90 YE NO YES NO YES NO YES NO OFFICIAL RECORD COPY DOCMENT NAME:
G:NS515.0CO
LIST OF ATTENDEES Duke Energy Corporation (DEC) - Oconee Nuclear Station (ONS)
W. McCollum, Site Vice President, ONS W. Foster, Safety Assurance Manager. ONS M. Nazar. Engineering Manager. ONS E. Burchfield. Regulatory Compliance Manager. ONS J. Forbes. Station Manager, ONS J. Fisicaro. Nuclear Assessment and Issues Division, DEC D. Stewart. Community Relations, ONS D. Mangrum, Apple 96.3 T. Cregan, Greenville News D. Salter. HGP. Inc.
J. Bell, HGP, Inc.
NRC L. Reyes, Regional Administrator, Region II (RII)
H. Berkow, Director. Project Directorate 11-2. Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR)
C. Casto, Deputy Director. Division of Reactor Projects (DRP). RII C. Ogle. Chief, DRP Branch 1, RIL M. Scott, Senior Resident Inspector. Oconee E. Christnot, Resident Inspector. Oconee M. Thomas, Reactor Inspector. Division of Reactor Safety, RII D. LaBarge, Project Manager, Project Directorate 11-2. NRR M. Tschiltz, Regional Coordinator, Office of the Executive Director for Operations
Oconee Nuclear Station Bi-Monthly Performance Meeting OV EIR May 15, 1998 1
TO REPLACE LOST ICONS IN PROGRAM MANAGER GO TO FILE CLICK ON NEW CLICK ON OK FOR PROGRAM GROUP IN DESCRIPTION TYPE IN NAME OF APPLICATION TAB TO GROUP FILE AND TYPE IN THE FILE NAME CLICK ON OK TO COMPLETE USE APPLICATION NAME AND FILE NAME BELOW TO REPLACE ICON:
NRC Pay Pers (Admin only)
PC Local Applications r:\\apps\\paypers\\paypers.grp c:\\windows\\loca]\\local.grp WP 6.1 FACsys 3.40 c:\\windows\\wpwin6l.grp C:\\wi-ndos\\facsys34.grp Mouse After Dark c:\\mouse\\mouse.grp c:\\windows\\afterdar.grp Presentations XRII Applications c:\\windows\\presenta.grp r:\\winshare\\regionii grp NRC Autos b-gency.Wide Applications r:\\winshare\\ngn256.grp r:\\winshare\\netut256.grp Communications Startup r:\\winshare\\comm2.grp c:\\windows\\startup.grp Applications Microsoft Office c:\\windows\\applicat.grp c:\\windows\\microsof.grp FFB Programs (FFB Branch only)
Accessories c:\\windows\\ffbprogr.grp c:\\windows\\accessor.grp Main c:aai
/Network Applications r:\\winshare\\applicat.grp
Purpose of Meeting
- Plant Status
- Overview of Recent Performance
- Recovery Plan Focus Areas
- Closing Remarks 2
Plant Status Units 1 and 3 operating at 100% full power
- Unit 2 refueling outage started March 13, 1998 Focus on deliberate, controlled outage Clear and consistent communication between site organizations emphasized Integrated Control System and Operator Aid Computer replacements Reactor coolant pump and steam generator inspections Service water modifications
- Unit 3 refueling outage this fall 3
Unit 1 Power History
'%Nudel 120 Shutdown to Repair D7eater Criin Seconday Side Piping Shutdown to Inspect HPI Nozzles Punp Repairs 100 Operation at 73% due to 1A1 RCP Vibration 80 Shutdown to repair MFW Control Valve and H PI valv STube Leak 60Outage 40 hutdown to Repair 1A1 RCP Vibration 20 EOC 17 Refueling Outage
-L
(-L r-r-
r-O C
0 C=:
C)-nc r-2 r--
- U-)
UU C-(7N 4
4
Unit 2 Power History 4ee Nct~
120 Shutdown to Repair Shutdown to Repair Power Reduction to Secondary Side Piping HPI Thermal Sleeve Inspect RB Insulation 100 80 Reactor Trip 40i
-1 dueto.
Disturbance 2P1La
-0 EOC 16 Refueling n0 Outage 5
4 OwER Unit 3 Power History ee Nude 120 HPI Nozzle Inspections/Repairs, Shutdown to Repair 3B RBCU 3A and 3B HPI Punp Repairs and 3B HPI Pump Motor 801 60 Turbine Offline 40,-_
to Repair Seal Oil Pump Power Reduction 20 to emove RB Insulation EOC 16 Refueling Outag
- 0.
r--
IL~
£1-
- L rL r
r (D
0 0
L-0 6
0ER Licensee Event Trend INDUSTRY VS. OCONEE EVENT AVERAGES PER QUARTER 3.5 03 2.5
( 2 mi 0
96/1 96/2 96/3 96/4 97/1 97/2 97/3 97/4 98/1 QUARTER Sidustry
- Oconee 7
III Expectations for 1998 e cNe2I Measure Year-end goal Year-to-Date Status Personnel Safety Index 4
.33 Green Nuclear System Events 25 8
Yellow Effective Full Power Days 924.35 273.52 Red Human Performance Index 1.75 1.75 Green Station Radiation Exposure 292 person-rem 145.381 Red Performance Indicator Index 79.83 72.57 Yellow INPO Rating 2 or better N/A N/A 8
VWRCo Assessment of Recent Performance
- Recovery Plan is addressing right issues
- Management changes to support performance improvement
- Progress being made
- Initiatives and measures finalized for 1998
- Enhanced process for tracking performance
Assessment of Recent Performance
- Strong safety focus on Unit 2 outage
- Deliberate execution of jobs
- Emphasis on clear communications
- Three major assessments since last meeting
- Interface with MOG being established 06
1998 RECOVERY PLAN FOCUS AREAS Operational Quality and Safety Financial of Operations Production Management KEY HUMAN SELF PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT McCOLLUM FOSTER FITUEL PIPSEKEEPITG INVOEEXI1B 9CiO PSTTUS YORLEFS QUALIT STATU SESO ASSSONN S
, DENGHMAIN1 PROBLEMSE ASSESMENT Y UELLW 2026PIT STATUS YD(E8lh
Recovery Plan Measures "e NuctC Human Performance
- of Human Performance Events
- of Human Performance Occurrences Self Assessment PIP Backlog > 6 months Problem Evaluations Not Within 30 days Root Cause Quality Design Basis Milestones Met For The Following Design Basis Projects:
OSRDC Service Water UFSAR Generic Letter 96-06 SQUG Outlier Resolution ITS Implementation Safety System Reviews (HPI/LPI, Emergency Power, Emergency Feedwater) 12
Recovery Plan Measures System & Equipment Reliability
- Temp Mods Mods Completed Vs Planned By MRPT MEPR Milestones Met Maintenance Rule Action Plan Milestones Met Effective Full Power Days Safety System Unavailability Equipment Failures (Maintenance Rule Functional Failures)
Operational Focus
- Workable CRIPS
- SOER 94-01 Items Cleared vs Expected
- Operator Burdens Cleared vs Expected
- Housekeeping Milestones Met
- Operations Procedure Change Requests Outstanding
- Pre-Outage Milestones Met 13
Operational Focus Initiatives 4ee NucdeI
- Work Control Process
- Tech Spec Surveillance Program
- Outage Readiness
- OAC System Project Closeout
- Housekeeping and Material Condition Program
- Control Board Monitoring-Control Room Improvement
- Technical Quality of Operating Procedures
- Maintenance Tech Support
- Single Point Access For Radiological Control 14
Operational Focus Initiatives
- Outage Readiness
- Unit 2 refueling outage
- Unit 2 pre-outage milestones created a challenge
- Focus on deliberate execution of tasks
- Emphasized clear conununications between organizations
- Outage has been very successful from a safety perspective
- Outage Duration better than expected
- Unit 3 refueling outage
- Management focus on pre-outage milestones 15
Operational Focus Measures Outage Performance
- Unit 3 Pre-Outage Milestones:
- Scope Freeze Date & Unit 3 Pre-Outage Plan Issued
- RWPs, Temporary Power Requests & Procedures Issued
- Pre-Outage Safety Risk Assessment Conducted
- Supplemental Workforce.Requests Finalized
- Outage Material Received & Onsite 16
,COWER CO4
,E__
Operational Focus Initiatives Housekeeping/Material Condition
- Momentum is Mounting
- Management Expectations: 5/13 Meeting
- Initiative Leadership is Strong
- Phase 1: Initial Recovery
- Phase 2: Systematic Reclamation of Areas
- Commitment to Higher Standards 17
0'*
Operational Focus Initiatives Work Control Process Control Room Daily Schedule & Access Controls
- Work Process Management Meeting Station Health & Work Week Assessment Reports Quality Innage Schedule in Compliance with Work Process Manual Work Order Backlog & CRIP Reduction Team Effective Utilization of Planning Centers Fully Loaded Schedule & Site Commitment at T-2 18
Operational Focus Measures Workable CRIPs -Goal 5 Per Unit 20.0.
12.0 S10.0-1--- ---
MWorkable 80-Goal_ __
GRIPs per Unit 6.0 I
4.0..
2.0 LO n( r-00
- 0)
Co Q,
(
tl-0:
)
0 T
L Week #
19
Operational Focus Measures Corrective Non-Outage Work Orders 660 640 620 600 580 560 -
MOcon ee 540 520 5 0 0 15-1-
15-29-12-26-10 Feb M ar Mar Mar Apr Apr May 20
Operational Focus Measures
'~Nude~
Corrective Work Order Backlog > 180 Days 135 13011 125 120 115-Oconee 110 105 15-1-
15-29-12-26-10 Feb Mar Mar Mar Apr Apr May 21
Operational Focus Summary
- Clear Vision of Where We're Headed
- Enthusiasm Mounting: We're In Control of Our Destiny
- Next 4 Months Are Critical
- Our Teammates Are Bought In - No Excuse For Not Getting There 22
Design Basis Initiatives
-/_NudeC)
- Engineering System Reviews OSRDC SQUG Outlier Resolution
- Improved Tech Specs Service Water Project
- UFSAR Project Review Generic Letter 96-06
- Emergency Power Configuration Management
- Control Room Ventilation System 23
"rill Design Basis Overview OCONEE DESIGN BASIS OVERVIEW CONTROL ROOM VENTILATION SYSTEM CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT GENERIC LETTER 96-06 UFSAR ACCURACY REVIEW OCONEE SERVICE WATER PROJECT IMPROVED TECH SPECS IMPLEMENTATION SQUG PROJECT OSROC PROJECT ENGINEERING SYSTEM REVIEWS 0
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
% COMPLETE - KNOWN SCOPE 24
Design Basis Measures SNucle2t HPUILPI iTA PIP CORRECTIVE.ACTIONS.REMAINING 90 85 80 75 A
70 65 60 SS 50 45 40 35 30
- 25.
20.
15 10 5
0 Jan-98 Feb-98 Mar-98 Apr-98 May-98 Jun-98 Jul-98 Aug-98 Sep-98 Oct-98 Nov-98 Dec-98 25
_as HPI/LPI Safety System Review Key Milestone Dates:
Description Target Date Completion Date Reliability Study
- Define scope, schedule 5/27/97 5/27/97
- Complete data collection 6/30/97 6/30/97
- Obtain preliminary results 7/15/97 7/15/97
- Complete sensitivity study 8/15/97 8/15/97
- Refine study 8/29/97 8/29/97
- Issue draft report 9/30/97 9/23/97
- ONS Review 10/15/97 10/31/97
- Issue final report 10/31/97 11/6/97
- Submit report to NRC 12/31/97 12/22/97 HPULPI Audit
- Request audit 8/1/97 8/1/97 Complete audit 12/15/97 12/11/97 HPI/LPI Audit PIP Resolution
- Develop plan 4/1/98 4/1/98
- Complete plan 12/31/98 26
Design Basis Measures e jude
.EMERGENCY POWER SYSTEM NRC OPEN ITEMS 10..
9 j
Actual
- -Sched 7
6 4
3 1
May-98 Jun-98 Jut-98 Aug-98 Sep-98 Oct-98 Nov-98 Dec-98 Jan-99 Feb-99 Mar-99 Apr-99 May-99 Jun-99 Jul-99 Aug-99
Emergency Power System NRC Open Items Description Target Com
- 1. Review lockout functions and alarm response guides for adverse interactions. (LER 269/97-06, PIP 5/8/98 4/15/98 97-1906, and VIO 97-14-03)
5/31/98
- 3. All protective relay calibration procedures will be revised to remove the step which would prevent to 7/1/98 reporting of an out of tolerance relay to Engineering. (PIP 97-2796 and VIO 97-16-08)
- 4. Verification of the voltage adjuster switches will be performed at each voltage regulator calibration.
7/8/98 (PIP 98-0106 and VIO 97-18-08)
- 5. Complete the root cause evaluation for the Agastat time. delay and type D87 timer relays to prevent a 7/8/98 recurring event. (PIP 98-0106 and IFI 97-18-09)
- 6. Installation of new ground detection equipment. (PIP 95-245, IFI 96-03-04, and NSM ON-53004, INN67 NSM is slotted for implementation in INN67)
- 7. Keowee Voltage/Frequency Protection Mod. (PIP 96-2536 and NSM ON-53014, NSM is slotted for INN67 implementation in INN67.)
- 8. Close violation on failure to adequately implement the Lee Station procedure to align the Lee gas NRC turbine. All PIP corrective actions have been completed. (PIP 97-1906 and VIO 97-14-02)
- 9. Close violation on failure to implement vendor recommendation for DB-25 circuit breakers. All PIP NRC corrective actions have been completed. (PIP 97-1907 and VIO 97-14-04)
- 10. Close violation on failure to conduct post mod testing on Keowee overvoltage relay. All PIP NRC corrective actions have been completed. (PIP 97-1907 and VIO 97-14-09) 28
0 Design Basis Measures OSRDC PROJECT-MAJOR MILESTONE STATUS 4/1/98 MILESTONE DUE DATE STATUS I
PIP OPEN ITEMS 711197 COMPLETED 6/30/97 2
REVISE EVENT MITIGATION CALCS 1211/97 COMPLETED 12/1/97 3
QA-1 CHECKLIST 12/16/97 COMPLETED 12/16/97 4
EVENT MITIGATION CALCULATIONS 12/31/97 COMPLETED 12/31/97.
5 FUNDING REQUEST PACKAGE 2/17/98 COMPLETED 2/17/98 6
COMPONENT DATABASE INSTRUCTIONS 3/20/98 COMPLETED 3/19/98 7
DBE.WHITE PAPER 4120/98 COMPLETED 4/20/98 8
EVENT SCOPE FOR QA-5 5/15/98 50%
9 QA-6 SCREENING CRITERIA 6/18/98 10%
10 QA-5 PROGRAM DEFINITION 8/3/98 10%
11 QA-5 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 12/10/98 0%
12 COMPLETE COMPONENT.DATABASE 12/16/98 50%
13 START QAS IMPLEMENTATION 1/99 0%
29
10 ~ER 4
SQUG Project
- SQUG Initial Review Complete 12/31/97 (as planned)
- Submit Implementation Plan to NRC 6/30/98 (on target)
- Begin Planned Work 7/1/98 (on target) 30
Improved Tech Specs Key Milestone Dates:
Description Target Date Completion Date ITS Integrated Review Complete 8/22/97 8/22/97 PORC Approval of Submittal 10/17/97 10/16/97 NSRB Approval of Submittal 10/24/97 10/22/97 Submittal of ITS to NRC 1/31/97 10/28/97 Scoping Complete 2/1/98 2/1/98 QA Topical Revision Submitted 3/31/98 3/31/98 All Questions Received from NRC 3/31/98 3/19/98 Supplement #1 Submitted to NRC 4/30/98 3/26/98 CTS 3.7 (Electrical) approved by NRC 8/1/98 SLC Development Complete 9/30/98 Program Development Complete 9/30/98 Procedure Revisions Complete 9/30/98 Draft SER Received form NRC 11/98 Implementation Audit Complete 12/98 Receipt of Final SER from NRC 12/98 Site Training Complete 3/99 Implementation of ITS 3/99 31
Design Basis Measures
'~ ude2 oOconee Service Water implementation Parts Remaining 90 80 70
/gggACTUAL PARTS REMAINING 60 50 PROJECTED PARTS REMAINING 40 30 20 10.
- 0.
PROJECT U3EOC1 6 INNAGE U1EOCN START RO 64 RFO 5INN GE U2 CO N
A U3 OC 1996 F
5ROI NAGE UEC7 INGE 1997Ro 191998FO6 1999 1 O i
- 1) NSMs. Minor Modifications Constitute a "Part"
- 3)
Aportion oldthe are divided (Using partial turnovers) between Innage 65 and Innage 66.
- 3) Parts considered compete may have punchlist items remaining (conditional lurnover) but they do not affect operability of the associated equipment 32
Oconee Service Water Key Milestone Dates:
Description Target Date Completion Date Submit new 201 to Duke management 5/30/97 5/27/97 Obtain NRC concurrence on revised goal 3/20/97 3/20/97 Implement required U1EOC17 outage mods 11/30/97 11/10/97 Implement required U2EOC16 outage mods 6/1/98 Implement shared / innage mods 6/1/98 Successfully complete integrated test 6/1/98 Implement required U3EOC17 outage mods 11/1/98 Implement required U1EOC18 outage mods 7/15/99 Create detailed schedule/plan to impl. mods 3/15/97 3/1/97 33
Design Basis Measures UFSAR Review Items Remaining 7000 6000 g
A ctual
~Es t.
5000 E
4000 3000 2000 1000 0
J Fe Ma Ap Ma J
Jul-Au Se 0
No an-b-
r-r-
y-un-98 9-p-
Ct-98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 Review items for medium and high priority chapters are estimates.
The curve will be updated as chapters are split into discrete review items.
34
UFSAR Review Key Milestone Dates:
Description Target Date Corn pietion D ate Inter-site working group assessment of UFSAR 5/1/96 5/1/96 update process and UFSAR state Establish more detailed ownership of UFSAR 12/1/96 12/1/96 sections Quality Verification (G.O.) audit of UFSAR update 12/1/96 12/1/96 process and U FSAR state Performance of aud.it in accordance with NEI 96-05 12/31/96 12/31/96 Site awareness campaign 12/31/96 12/31/96 UFSAR drawings improvements 12/31/96 12/31/96 Implement NSD 220 3/26/97 3/31/97 NEl 96-05 UFSAR audit corrective actions resolved 4/30/97 5/15/97 Implementation plan/organization for accuracy and 5/27/97 12/31/97 completeness review of entire UFSAR Review and resolution of discrepancies of typical 10/31/97 11/7/97 chapter (Chapter 5) of UFSAR for resource estimation (PHASE 1)
Implementation plan/organization for accuracy and 12/31/97 12/31/97 completeness review of entire UFSAR (PHASE II)
Accuracy and completeness review of UFSAR 3/16/98 3/22/98 Chapter 9 Resolution packages transmitted to RG C 3/31/98 4/23/98 Accuracy and completeness review of high* priority 6/30/98 chapters in the UFSAR (6, 7, 8, 10)
Resolution of UFSAR Chapter 6, 7,8, 10 10/31/98 discrepancies- (DE&S portion only).
Accuracy and completeness review of remaining 10/31/98 chapters in the UFSAR Resolution of remaining U FSAR Chapter 3/31/99 discrepancies - (DE&S portion only).
All UFSAR corrective actions from accuracy and 1999 completeness review resolved - to be finalized after 35 all discrepancies have been identified Conversion to online "living" UFSAR
>1 99 8
0WNER CO Generic Letter 96-06
~e N dt)0 Key Milestone Dates:
Description Target Completion Date Date Analysis Phase
- Review ALTRAN & SAG calcs (DE&S) 10/24/97 10/24/97
- Develop F-T for LOOP (ALTRAN) 10/24/97 10/24/97
- Perform piping analysis for LOOP data (DE&S) 12/15/97 12/15/97
- Develop Inside RB F-T for LOCA/LOOP to 3/16/98 3/16/98 support operability (ALTRAN)
- Develop Outside RB F-T for LOCA/LOOP to 4/1/98 4/1/98 support operability (ALTRAN)
- Perform LOCA/LOOP piping analysis to support 4/18/98 4/18/98 Unit 3 operability (DE&S)
- Perform LOCA/LOOP support analysis to support 6/25/98 Unit 3 operability (DE&S)
- Perform LOCA/LOOP platform analysis to 7/10/98 support Unit 3 operability
- Perform Units 1 & 2 similarity analysis to support 7/17/98 operability evaluations.
- Submit USQ (RGC) (subject to analysis results) 8/1/98 Modification Phase
- Develop FSD for Unit 1 RFO Dec 98
- Develop FSD for Unit 2 RFO April 99
- Develop FSD for Unit 3 RFO Sept99
- Implement Unit 1 mods 1 EOC-1 8
- Imple.ment Unit 2 mods 2EOC-17
- Implement Unit 3 mods 3EOC-1C8 36
Configuration Management Key M ilestone Dates:
Description Target Date Com pletion Form Configuration M anagem ent S
eering Team 02/01/98 01/2a0 98 Finalize Steering Team Charter
- LVW 03/01/98 03/0-198 CM St eering Team Provide oversight to Site n/goin 0ngoing CM M anagem ent Projects already underway LV W EIectronic Library Project Equipment Database Year 2000 Project Labeling Project UFSAR Accuracy Project OSROC Pro Oct BWST RootCause
-. Assessmentof SIte/Safely 03/16/98 03/16/98 Analysis Uncertainty/Setpoint C alcu lion C on fig u ra tion C on trolI P ro gre s
T KR Calculation Process Assessmenlcomp is d
0 5/01/98 TK R Develop "Documents Atfected plan of attack 05/01/98 05/01/98 and begin im plem entation (see M NS M odification Docum ents Pilot Program
)
D B C /L V W Staff SpeciaIPrjecITeam Io.deaIwih NS 06/01/98 configuration Managem ant issuea on a
priority basis.
Begin wIth action from BWST C a Ic u Ia tio n Asss a
m en is In s ta II in lerim measure to prevent Engineering configuration manag e
ntIssues.
A.
Re v is e SIte DIrectIve 1.3.6 lotion Labeiing 03/1 1/98 to explain
's ofl m aitch 'ofI t
c hnic alI In to rm a li n
E S L ProvidPe a no tiic a lion p roSc e s th a twill 04/01/98 Idea nMtify calcu tions affect ed a
fid com pIe i
m odif c a tions W M SR C.
Emphasmzee to Eng in eering requIrementto 04/15/98 05/04/98 Identify calculations affected on the
'Documenis Affected List' in a 11NSM 's and M M 's D E T D.
Begin use of color copies to assure red-05/01/98 04/20/98 m ark s gelI c k e d up byMod Engneerng 37___
03/1639
0 Control Room Ventilation System Key Milestone Dates:
D C
scription Tarnet Date Completion Date ISSUE 1.
ControI Room Habita bility Inspect and repair Control Room doors for 3/15/98 Complete leakage.
Revise EOP to start booster fans during ES C omplete and at start of tube rupture.
Document start time assum ptions for all C om plete accident that need control room habitability.
Smoke testand seal identified leaks in CRVS Complete Seal all external CRVS ductwork/housings Complete (C om plete) NRC Comm itm ent Develop training for control room personnel Com plete on the use of KI.
Modify PMT for work on CRVS to required 5/1/98 le ak te s tin g.
C om plete sealing of CR boundary NRC 5/1/98 C o m m itm en t Perform test to determine effects of single 5/31/98 failure on pressurization system Quantify current C RVS unfiltered in-leakage 6/30/98 using tracer gas. NRC Comm itm ent Develop long term surveillance for CRVS 9/30/98 pressure boundary. (To be determine follow ing tracer g as testing)
Replace isolation dam pers If required per 8/31/98 single failure test. (Aug 1998)
Evaluate modification options required to put 11/30/98 38 Oconee back into full com pliance with license.
System/Equipment Reliability Initiatives OAC Replacement Project ICS Modification
- Control Rod Drive Mechanism Concerns
- Major Equipment Problem Resolution (MEPR) Process System Teams
- Emergency Power System Reliability Project
- Management of Temporary Modifications
- Equipment Aging Program
- Secondary System/Equipment Reliability Steam Generator Reliability Piping Reliability 39
SER01 System/Equipment Reliability Overview OCONEE SYS/EQUIP RELIABILITY OVERVIEW PIPING RELIABILITY STEAM GENERATOR RELIABILITY SECONDARY SYS/EQUIP RELIABILITY EQUIPMENT AGING PROGRAM TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS EMERGENCY POWER SYSTEM RELIABILITY STUDY SYSTEM TEAMS MEPR PROCESS (MEPR MILESTONES)
CONTROL ROD DRIVE MECHANISMS ICS REPLACEMENT PROJECT OAC REPLACEMENT PROJECT 0
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
% COMPLETE - KNOWN SCOPE 40
System/iEquipment Reliability Measures Nucie1l Equ ipm ent Failures Y-T-enDFrue 1 5%
.. ~~Equipment Failures 1 4%
Annual Target
~13%
1 12%
Equipment Failures
~ 1i%
2Mnth Rotling 10%Av S9%
1%
0 5%
t 4%
U.
3%
w 2%
0%
97e g
8 0
y o
98 ug-89 98 g
98 98 110 FPDs L st ue o E uip entFa ilure*a 100 nit vg. Y 90
_.._ 12 Month Roiling 80 Unit Avg 70 Level (par unit)
.8
.0 8
so
System/Equipment Reliability Measures 25 1998 MEPR Milestones Remaining MEPR Milestones Remaining - Actual 20 MEPR Milestones Remainin g Scheduled 15 10 0
12/31/97 in 6S 2 EOC18 Ia 66 U3 EOC17 Inn 67 42
Ea Co TEPR Process Key Milestone Dates:
Description Target Date Completion Date
- 1. Form TEPR Review Team 7/31/97 7/31/97
- 2. Develop TEPR Meeting agenda and schedule 7/31/97 7/31/97
- 3. Originate draft TEPR site directive 8/14/97 8/14/97
- 4. Finalize TEPR site directive (effective date 1/1/98) 9/30/97.
9/18/97
- 5. Develop initial Major Equipment Problem Resolution 10/02/97 10/2/97 (MEPR) list
- 6. Finalize detailed TEPR expectations document 11/06/97 11/13/97
- 7. Develop initial Work-around Problem Resolution 11/06/97 11/4/97 (WAPR) list
- 8. Issue TEPR site directive and conduct necessary 11/30/97 11/30/97 training
- 9. Develop TEPR tracking and documentation tool 12/31/97 12/31/97
- 10. Perform program self-assessment 5/28/98
- 11. Finalize TEPR NSD 1/1/99 43
0 III System/Equipment Reliability SMeasures NSMs Implemented vs. Planned 1998-99 Objective is complete >=90%
Pri 1&2 NSMs 100 Cancellation of Pri 1&2 NSMs will not decrease the number of these planned 4
NSMs Planned (cumulative) 80 Pri 1&2 NSMs Planned I
Pri3 NSMs Planned 70 -
Pri 1&2 NSMs Implemented (cumulative)
Pri 3 NSMs Implemented (cumulative) 60 50 40 10 01 Inn 65 U2EOC16 Inn 66 U3EOC17 Inn 67 U1EOC18 Inn 68 U2EOC17 Inn 69 44
I"ll Temp Mods Key Milestone Dates:
Des c rip tio n Tarqe Corn I tio D ate Da te
- 1.
Resolve Discrepancies between Engin.eering Data 1/97 10/06197 Bases and Control Room TM Iogs
- 2.
Review Current Perform ance vs Existing TM 01/30/98 12/19/97 directives (self assessm ent)
- 3.
Review with TSM Controlling Groups Existing 02/19/98 02/26/98 Procedures Used to ControlTem porary Installations to Determine Their Adequacy.
- 4.
Develop Philosophy and Guidance for ApprovaIof 03/05/98 3/05/98 Long Term temporary modifications
- 5.
.Determine Pre-Requisite for allowing 03/05/99 3/05/98 existing TM 's to con tin u e to re m a in in s ta lle d.
- 6.
Determine ONS TSM Performance Goals and 04/09/98 03/31/98 Establish Monitoring and Tracking Methods A g a in st G o a Is
- 7.
Revise TSM Directive to Incorporate the 06/15/98 g uid elin es ad o pte d b y th e N ucle ar E xcelIle nc e Team on 3/16/98 for restriction and avoidance of fu tu re T S M s
- 8.
ForalCategory 2 TSMs th at req ire action by the 08/01/98 M RPT, all Mod Activation Request Form s will be completed and submitted to the MRPT.
- 9.
For allCategory 3 TSMs a minor mod willbe 09/01/98 developed and signed off as corn plete to document the existing TSM on permanent drawings. (Minor Mods to document the rem oval/return to norm al will be prepared if a p prop a te) 10.The MRPT will activate the permanent 09/01/98 m odifications or recom mend rem oval of the TSM.
11.The permanent modifications will be slotted for 10/01/98 implementation by the MRPT orMM S lo ttin g e
08/01/9 Team.
12.The schedule for all perm anent m odifications 10/20/98 activated to replace TSM s shall be reviewed and approved by the NET.
45
o.0 System/Equipment Reliability Measures Success in Restoring Maint Rule Al Systems to A2 Status 1.00
'0.90 0.80 80g Actual Y-T-D Success %
0.70 Goal - Success 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 I
I May-98 Jun-98 Jul-98 Aug-98 Sep-98 Oct-98 Nov-98 Dec-98 46
00 7R 1System/Equipment Reliability Measures Oconee Emergency Power System Reliability/Availability Assessment 30.
25 20 15 OPEN SCLOSEDI 0
- 0.
78 8
47
0 1
Emergency Power System Reliability/Availability Assessment Key Milestone Dates:
Description Target Date Cornletion Date Develop Draft Charter for this initiative 8/1/97 8/1/97 Site Management Review and Approval of 9/1/97 9/1/97 Charter Prepare 201 Special Work Order Request 9/18/97 9/17/97 Completed (if required)
Select contractors to perform the evaluation 10/1/97 9/26/97 (Selected Systems Research International - SRI)
Milestone 1 - SRI to deliver final resource loaded 10/24/97 10/24/97 schedule and cost estimate Milestone 2 - Draft Report (introduction, 11/19/97 11/17/97 Historical Overview, Keowee AC, Keowee Generator - Mechanical)
Milestone 3 - Draft Report (Lee/Central, Keowee 12/1/97 12/3/97 T/G, Keowee DC, Keowee Transformers)
Milestone 4 - Draft Report (Keowee Excitation, 12/8/97 12/10/97 Other Keowee Turbine Systems, 230kv Swyd)
Milestone 5 - Draft Report (ONS Swgr, ONS 12/22/97 12/23/97 Transformers, EPSL, OPS Integration Assess.)
Milestone 6 -
Final Report 12/31/97 1/5/98 Presentation of results to Management 1/15/98 1/15/98 Open Items entered in PIP or other appropriate 2/12/98 2/12/98 tracking system Select subset of 250 line item recommendations 2/23/98 2/22/98 to track Establish target dates for resolution of each of 4/9/98 4/9/98 the 29 items chosen for tracking Status Report on Tracked Recommendations 7/1/98 Status Report on Tracked Recommendations 10/1/98 Status Report on Tracked Recommendations 1/1/99 48
System/Equipment Reliability Measures cosONS HPISystem Unavailability o.o l
I m o n
a v aIIath a
b a
~
a 0
0 8
.-- 4i---
Un0it 2
-Uni2 0.0 3-------------------------
Goal 0.04 O00 0.0 Good 0
0.0 2
0 NS E F W U
navaIlabIlIty r
0. 0 1
U U
n I t 1 I
.- ~--.U n it 2
0.008 U
i 0
7-------------------------------------------------
U it 0.0 0 2_
o l7 0.004I 0.002 0
Good 0.03 ON8...
AC..
Power Unava~labIIIty 0.020
~R ng12 moith a
ag e
-o.
-I4.
K H 1 0.02 KH72 0.0 5
-~0 0.07 0.000 49
Self Assessment Initiatives Nude
- *PIP Backlog
- *Problem Evaluations
- *Root Cause Analysis Quality
- PIP Quality
- Manager Observations
- Group Self Assessments
- Benchmarking
- SRG Self Assessment Processes 50
Problem Identification Threshold NUMBER OF PIPS GENERATED 8 0 0 0 140 7000 6000
-AMOUNT TARGET 4676 5000 4000 2846 3000 2000 1827 1732 2380 2000 1091 1000 726 0
1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 YTD APRIL 1998 51
o
~Self Assessment Measures.;
~e 1ucWe Qx~ewclio is> 6 rnrtf~d YTDTARCErl 4M 0
I fLG IXT NW! LEM AN F3 NAR AFR NAY J-1,E JiLY ALG,ccEF (XT NO!(3 97 97 9797 97 989 89 9
89 52
O ER "IZ Self Assessment Measures Prclem Evaluation >30 days old YTDACitAL YTDTAR3ET 4(D 300-200 1
jj 03 JAN FB3MARAFR KvAY JJ\\E LLY ALG SEP COT NDV EEM 53
Ov)ER CO Self Assessment Measures CURRENT MONTH ACTUAL %
% OF PIPs REJECTED 25.0%.
sEC 12-MONTH ROLLING AVG. %
20.0%
15.0%
Target 1 0.0 %
5.0%
0.0%
AUG SEPT OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR AFJL MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT OCT NOV DEC 97 97 97 97 97 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 54
ERO Self Assessment Measures o
Nuce
% Manager Observations Conducted N%
- Target (%)
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
1st Qtr.
2nd Qtr. 1998 3rd Qtr.
4th Qtr.
55'
9L Self Assessment Measures "eNude NUMBER OF BENCHMARKING ACTIVITIES COMPLETED 20 18 YTDActual
- 18.
16 YTD Target 14 12 10 8
6 4
2 0
I JAN FEB MAR APRIL M4Y JUNE JULY AUG SEPT OCT NOV DEC 56
O0 El Self Assessment Measures NUII
% of Group Self Assessments Completed 0%
- Target (%)
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
1st Qtr.
2nd Qtr.19983rd Qtr.
4th Qtr.
57
Human Performance Initiatives
- Role of The Supervisor
- Real Time Behavior Based Monitoring
- Field Involvement/Job Observation (Quality
& Quantity)
- Pre-Job/Post-Job Briefs (Quality &
Quantity) 58
0ER
___1 Human Performance Measures 1
uctes Focus Issue Measure Definition:
DEFINITION:
Culture Index Combined score of all areas in the Self improvement Culture Survey.
This survey looks at 5 key areas of self-improwment culture focus; strength of mission and goals, knowledge and skill level, lateral integration (communication), simplicity of procedures and processes; and self-improwment culture programs (problem identification and resolution). Scores as compared to industry experience haw been shown to relate to per-Culture formance on future SALP score, per the following scale:
Index Score of 13.3 - 20:
86% of plants with this Cl have shown marked performance improvement (lower event rate) over time P B LeCroy 10%
Score of 11.3 - 13.3:
92% of plants with this Cl haw nearly constant performance GREEN:
>13.33 Score of < 11.3:
100% of plants with this Cl demonstrate subsequent decreases YELLOW:
> 11.3 in performance (increase in event rate)
RED:
< 11.3 GOAL:
SystemAvg > 13.0 by 12/31/97 SystemAvg > 14.0 by 12/31/98 ONS Culture Index =
11.94 59
/1 Human Performance Measures Cude FOCUS ISSUE MEASURE DEFINITION:
- 1. Field Involvement/Job Observation. WEIGHTED 20%.
EXPECTA TION: Each Division/Group willconduct, record and monitor Supervisor's Field Involvement and Job Observations on the Job Observation Form.
Performance expectations are established based on an average of 12 forms per supervisor per month.
Division/Group Measure = Number of Forms submitted per month CRITERIA:
Number of Supervisors GREEN:
> 12 YELLOW:
>4 to <12 RED:
<4
-,6rv Ion/WHITE:
Currently unreported 0REN Np ENGNrEIN thnOPvttn~ou r
Group ENGS MAINTENAC CHEMISTR6Y RORK CONTROL A RI 30 23 130 1584 21 1 72.55 412 27 487 4
4
- 13.
75 8
35 108 7
AUUL N UV U) t L, O ro up HRISECURIT Y CF.
mmCRITERIA FOR SITE MEASURE:
JAN8***
n
... i...
- s.6a.
GREEN:
No more than I Division/Group < Green JAN 97 7
1 3.;8 82 8
131.87 YELLOW:
> 2 Divisions/Groups < Green MA t
00V 7
14.25 52 a
13.au RED:
> 2 Dilvisions/Groups < Yellow ARI IO8 r
7 10 55 8
- 14.
WHITE:
Currently unreported JUN E JULY AUG 14U 60
Human Performance Measures FOCUS ISSUE MEASURE DEF#ffTON:
- 2. Pro-Job/Post Job Brief. WEIGHTED 20%.
EXPECTATION: Each Okvislon/,Grupwift conduct, record andmonih~arra.ojobpoag Job Briefs on a SnefingFrnn.
Porlbrmancs, expectalJons ere esobishodb *asod on an av'erage of S forms porsupervisorpormon ib.
Dh~a/onoGroup Mesure aNwnb.'
of Form, at~mlfftod Dmonti
,CRITERIA:
Number of SuperWo.S" GREEN:
-8 YELLOW:
- 2 to 8 RED
-'2 WHITE:
CureeIly wrvapored
-Uvrioni Group ENGINEERING OPS MAINTENANCE CHEMAISTRY ROR WmCONTROL
.lA N
33 ~
23 T 29lT 27~itr1 15.3 34 4
5.lT i
7 9V 4 f 1-h 32 23 261~i fl 29 2W
-27 1l?
1.3 40 T
T0 -ri 7 12 7
-Xpr-29-31 4i -n 6"- -in 7n ~~ t i r n-- n i-CRITERIA FOR SITE MEASURE GREEN: No more than, I D4idslorVGroup < Grown YELLOW:
> 2 Oivilon/Groupt 4 Green RED:
2 DI~sbins/Groups 4 Yello WHITE:
CunarNty uvvepoeted 61
(O ER CO)
E_
Human Performance Measures fudc FOCUS ISSUE MEASURE DEFINfTON:
Ratio of the number of PPs generated by the culpable group to the number generated by all groups.
DIvisont Group ENGINEERING OPS MAINTENANCE CHEMISTRY RP SEEURaTY Year End Target Year End Target Year End Target Year End Target Year End Target Year End Target 0.3 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.8 JUNE AUGi ul CRITERIA FOR SITE MEASURE:
GREEN:
1 Dilsion/Group < Green YELLOW:
2 DhsIcns/Groups < Green RED:
> 2 C4sions/Groups < Green 62
E Closing Remarks 63