ML15254A439

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review Determination - Millstone Units 2 and 3: ASME Sectionxi ISI Program Relief Requests for Limited Coverage Examinations - 4th 10-year ISI Interval (MF6567 - MF6574)
ML15254A439
Person / Time
Site: Millstone  Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 09/11/2015
From: Richard Guzman
Plant Licensing Branch 1
To: Craft W
Dominion Nuclear Connecticut
Guzman R
References
TAC MF6567, TAC MF6568, TAC MF6569, TAC MF6570, TAC MF6571, TAC MF6572, TAC MF6573, TAC MF6574
Download: ML15254A439 (1)


Text

From: Guzman, Richard Sent: Friday, September 11, 2015 2:12 PM To: 'wanda.d.craft@dom.com' Cc: Guzman, Richard; RidsNRRLIC109 Resource

Subject:

Acceptance Review Determination - Millstone Units 2 And 3: ASME SectionXI ISI Program Relief Requests for Limited Coverage Examinations - 4th 10-year ISI Interval (MF6567 - MF6574)

Wanda, The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the NRC staffs acceptance review of the subject licensing action requests By letters dated July 30, 2015 (ADAMS Accession Nos. ML15216A359 and ML15216A363),

Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc. (DNC) submitted several relief requests pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55a(g)(5)(iii) on the basis that the required examination coverage was impractical due to physical obstructions an limitations imposed by design, geometry and materials of construction of certain components.

The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

The NRC staff has reviewed DNCs requests for relief and concludes that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staffs detailed technical review by separate correspondence.

Thanks, Rich Guzman Sr. Project Manager NRR/DORL US NRC 301-415-1030