ML15244A670
| ML15244A670 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oconee, Mcguire, Catawba, McGuire |
| Issue date: | 10/16/1991 |
| From: | Wiens L Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9110250213 | |
| Download: ML15244A670 (36) | |
Text
October 16, 1991 Docket Nos. 50-269, 50-270, 50-287 DISTRIBUTION:
AKugler, 8D22 50-369, 50-370 Docket File TReed 50-413, 50-414 NRC & Local PDRs PHopkins, RH FMiraglia, 12G18 RMartin JPartlow, 12G18 PHarmon, RH SVarga GBelisle, RIT LICENSEE: DUKE POWER COMPANY PDII-3 R/F JZeiler, RII DMatthews PKVandoorn, RH FACILITY:
Oconee, Units 1, 2, and 3 LWiens McGuire, Units 1 and 2 OGC, 15B18 Catawba, Units 1 and 2 ACRS (10), P-315
SUBJECT:
SUMMARY
OF SEPTEMBER 4, 1991, DPC/NRC INTERFACE MEETING On September 4, 1991, the NRC staff (including NRR Project Managers and resident inspectors from Oconee, McGuire, and Catawba) met with representatives of Duke Power Company (DPC) at the Oconee Nuclear Station to discuss issues of interest to both NRC and DPC organizations. Meeting attendees are listed in. The agenda for the meeting is provided as Enclosure 2.
DPC opened the meeting with a status report on the Design Basis Documentation Program for all three Duke nuclear stations. Since there had been a number of personnel changes for the NRC, a brief description of the program was included in the presentation. Brew Barron, the Oconee Plant Manager, then provided a brief assessment of the current status of the Oconee station, followed by a description of initiatives undertaken by Oconee in the area of shutdown risk management. Following these presentations, Andy Kugler.of the Generic Communications Branch, NRR, gave a very informative presentation covering the entire spectrum of NRC generic communications, including sources of information, responsibilities for action, communication vehicles (i.e., generic letters, bulletins, information notices), and NRC tracking and distribution systems.
The final presentation addressed outage planning at Oconee. The meeting concluded with station-specific breakout sessions to discuss licensing issues of interest between NRR project managers, site resident inspectors and DPC compliance engineers. Copies of the slides and handouts used during the various presentations are provided as Enclosure 3.
/s/
Leonard A. Wiens, Project Manager Project Directorate 11-3
(..r 1' Division of Reactor Projects -
I/Il Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Enclosures:
9110250213 911016 As stated PDR ADOCK 05000269 cc w/enclosures:
See next page r
W, OFC
- LA:PDTI-3 P
I-
- D;RDII-3
.1.1------:
NAME
- LBerr
- Wiens~cw
- DMattheLp '
DATE : /J 1
- /// /91
- /6/2,4/91 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY Document Name:
SUMMARY
OF 9/4 MTG W/DPC
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 October 16, 1991 Docket Nos. 50-269, 50-270, 50-287 50-369, 50-370 50-413, 50-414 LICENSEE: DUKE POWER COMPANY FACILITY: Oconee, Units 1, 2, and 3 McGuire, Units 1 and 2 Catawba, Units 1 and 2
SUBJECT:
SUMMARY
OF SEPTEMBER 4, 1991, DPC/NRC INTERFACE MEETING On September 4, 1991, the NRC staff (including NRR Project Managers and resident inspectors from Oconee, McGuire, and Catawba) met with representatives of Duke Power Company (DPC) at the Oconee Nuclear Station to discuss issues of interest to both NRC and DPC organizations. Meeting attendees are listed in. The agenda for the meeting is provided as Enclosure 2.
DPC opened the meeting with a status report on the Design Basis Documentation Program for all three Duke nuclear stations. Since there had been a number of personnel changes for the NRC, a brief description of the program was included in the presentation. Brew Barron, the Oconee Plant Manager, then provided a brief assessment of the current status of the Oconee station, followed by a description of initiatives undertaken by Oconee in the area of shutdown risk management. Following these presentations, Andy Kugler of the Generic Communications Branch, NRR, gave a very informative presentation covering the entire spectrum of NRC generic communications, including sources of information, responsibilities for action, communication vehicles (i.e., generic letters, bulletins, information notices), and NRC tracking and distribution systems.
The final presentation addressed outage planning at Oconee. The meeting concluded with station-specific breakout sessions to discuss licensing issues of interest between NRR project managers, site resident inspectors and DPC compliance engineers. Copies of the slides and handouts used during the various presentations are provided as Enclosure 3.
Leonard A. Wiens, Project Manager Project Directorate 11-3 Division of Reactor Projects -
I/II Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Enclosures:
As stated cc w/enclosures:
See next page
ENCLOSURE 1 MEETING ATTENDEES Name Organization Len Wiens NRC/PDII-3 Andy Kugler NRC/NRR Tim Reed NRC/PDIH-3 Perry Hopkins NRC H. B. Barron Duke/ONS, STA MGR R. C. Futrell Duke/NSA, GO Joe M. Davis Duke/Oconee/Tech. Serv. Supt.
Philip J. North Duke/NSA/Compliance Laura Burba Duke/NSA/Compliance David Ethington Duke/NSA/Compliance Terry Pedersen Duke/MNS/Compliance Bill Reeside Duke/MNS/Compliance Mgr.
Bob Gill Duke/GO/Compliance T. P. Harrall Duke/Design Engr/CNS Site Office C. L. Hartzell Duke/NPD/CNS Comp Mngr.
R. E. Martin NRC/PDHI-3 Paul Harman NRC/Oconee Sr. Resident G. A. Belisle NRC/Section Chief RIH DRP Section 3A John Zeiler NRC/Catawba Resident Inspector P. Kim VanDoorn NRC/McGuire SRI Mary Hazeltine Duke/GO/Compliance Ray Hollins CMD-S W. H. (Bill) Taylor Duke/DE/McGuire Engr. Div.
S. G. Benesole Duke/NPO/GO/Comp.
ENCLOSURE 2 DUKE/NRC INTERFACE MEETING OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION Office Building, Rooms 619 and 619A September 4, 1991 AGENDA 8:00am COFFEE 8:30am Design Basis Documentation Jack Peele Project Status Report 9:15am Oconee Station Status Brew Barron 10:00am BREAK 10:15am NRC Presentation NRC Generic.Communications 11:30am Successful Outages Rick Bond 12 Noon LUNCH 12:30pm Breakout Sessions Oconee McGuire Catawba 3:OOm ADJOURN
Duke Power Company Catawba Nuclear Station cc:
Mr. J.W. Hampton, Station Manager Mr. Alan R. Herdt, Chief Duke Power Company Project Branch #3 Catawba Nuclear Station U.S. Nuclear-Regulatory Commission 4800 Concord Road 101 Marietta Street, NW, Suite 2900 York, South Carolina 29745 Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Mr. A.V. Carr, Esq.
North Carolina Electric Membership Duke Power Company Corp.
422 South Church Street P.O. Box 27306 Charlotte, North Carolina 28242-0001 Raleigh, North Carolina 27611 J. Michael McGarry, III, Esq.
Saluda River Electric Cooperative, Winston and Strawn Inc.
1400 L Street, N.W.
P.O. Box 929 Washington, D. C. 20005 Laurens, South Carolina 29360 North Carolina MPA-1 Senior Resident Inspector Suite 600 Route 2, Box 179N P.O. Box 29513 York, South Carolina 29745 Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-513 Regional Administrator, Region II Mr. Frank Modrak U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Project Manager, Mid-South Area 101 Marietta Street, NW, Suite 2900 ESSD Projects Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Westinghouse Electric Corp.
MNC West Tower - Bay 241 Mr. Heyward G. Shealy, Chief P.O. Box 355 Bureau,of Radiological Health Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15230 South Carolina Dept. of Health and Environmental Control County Manager of York County 2600 Bull Street York County Courthouse Columbia, South Carolina 29201 York, South Carolina 29745 Ms. Karen E. Long Richard P. Wilson, Esq.
Assistant Attorney General Assistant Attorney General North Carolina Dept. of Justice S.C. Attorney General's Office P.O. Box 629 P.O. Box 11549 Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 Columbia, South Carolina 29211 Mr. R.L. Gill, Jr.
Piedmont Municipal Power Agency Nuclear Production Department 121 Village Drive Duke Power Company Greer, South Carolina 29651 P.O. Box 1007 Charlotte, North Carolina 28201-1007 Mr. M. S. Tuckman, Vice President Nuclear Operations Duke Power Company P. 0. Box 1007 Charlotte, North Carolina 28201-1007
Duke Power Company McGuire Nuclear Station cc:
Mr. A.V. Carr, Esq.
Dr. John M. Barry Duke Power Company Department of Environmental Health 422 South Church Street Mecklenburg County Charlotte, North Carolina 28242-0001 1200 Blythe Boulevard Charlotte, North Carolina 28203 County Manager of Mecklenburg County 720 East Fourth Street Mr. Dayne H. Brown, Director Charlotte, North Carolina 28202 Department of Environmental, Health and Natural Resources Mr. Paul Guill Division of Radiation Protection Duke Power Company P.O. Box 27687 Nuclear Production Department Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 P.O. Box 1007 Charlotte, North Carolina 28201-1007 Mr. Alan R. Herdt, Chief Project Branch #3 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission J. Michael McGarry, III, Esq.
101 Marietta Street, NW, Suite 2900 Winston and Strawn Atlanta, Georgia 30323 1400 L Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20005 Ms. Karen E. Long Assistant Attorney General N. C. Department of Justice Senior Resident Inspector P.O. Box 629 c/o U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 12700 Hagers Ferry Road Huntersville, North Carolina 28078 Mr. R.L. Gill, Jr.
Nuclear Production Department Regional Administrator, Region II Duke Power Company U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P.O. Box 1007 101 Marietta Street, N.W., Suite 2900 Charlotte, North Carolina 28201-1007 Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Mr. M. S. TUckman, Vice President Mr,. Frank Modrak Nuclear Operations Project Manager, Mid-South Area Duke Power Company ESSD Projects P. 0. Box 1007 Westinghouse Electric Corporation Charlotte, North Carolina 28201-1007 MNC West Tower -
Bay 241 P. 0. Box 355 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15230
0I Duke Power Company Oconee Nuclear Station Units Nos. 1, 2 and 3 cc:
Mr. A.V. Carr, Esq.
Mr. Stephen Benesole Duke Power Company Duke Power Company 422 South Church Street Post Office Box 1007 Charlotte, North Carolina 28242-0001 Charlotte, North Carolina 28201-1007 J. Michael McGarry, III, Esq.
Winston and Strawn Mr. Alan R. Herdt, Chief 1400 L Street, N.W.
Project Branch #3 Washington, D.C. 20005 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 101 Marietta Street, NW, Suite 2900 Mr. Robert B. Borsum Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Babcock & Wilcox Nuclear Power Division Ms. Karen E; Long Suite 525 Assistant Attorney General 1700 Rockville Pike N. C. Department of Justice Rockville, Maryland 20852 P.O. Box 629 Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 Manager, LIS NUS Corporation Mr. R.L. Gill, Or.
2650 McCormick Drive, 3 Floor Nuclear Production Department Clearwater, Florida 34619-1035 Duke Power Company P.O. Box 1007 Senior Resident Inspector Charlotte, North Carolina 28201-1007 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Route 2, Box 610 Mr. M. S. Tuckman, Vice President Seneca, South Carolina 29678 Nuclear Operations Duke Power Company Regional Administrator, Region 1I P. 0. Box 1007 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Charlotte, North Carolina 28201-1007 101 Marietta Street, N.W., Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Mr. Heyward G. Shealy, Chief Bureau of Radiological Health South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control 2600 Bull Street Columbia, South Carolina 29201 Office of Intergovernmental Relations 116 West Jones Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27603 County Supervisor of Oconee County
- Calhalla, South Carolina 29621
ENCLOSURE 3 DUKE POWER DESIGN BASIS DOCUMENTATION UPDATEFOR NRC INTERFACE MEETING 9-4-91
- 1. BRIEF REVIEW OF DBD PROJECT
- 2. DBD SCHEDULE STATUS
- 3. DBD AUTOMATION PROGRESS
- 4. DISCUSSION OF OCONEE EXPERIENCE
- 5. QUESTIONS (?)
77~
DESIGN BASIS HIERARCHY PLANT DB SYSTEM DB SYSTEM DC EQUIPMENT DC DB = DESIGN BASES DC = DESIGN CRITERIA
SECTION
10.0 INTRODUCTION
- BOUNDARY AND SCOPE
- SYSTEM PURPOSE
- FORMAT AND USE SECTION 20.0 DESIGN BASES AND CRITERIA
- ONLY SAFETY-RELATED AND REGULATORY REQUIRED SYSTEM AND EQUIPMENT DESIGN BASES.
PROBLEM INVESTIGATION PROCESS INVOKED IF VIOLATED e
SECTION 30.0 SYSTEM /STRUCTURE DESCRIPTIONS
- DESCRIPTION OF SAFETY AND NON-SAFETY FUNCTIONS
- NON-SAFETY RELATED AND NON-REGULATORY REQUIRED DESIGN BASES
ORIGINAL ESTIMATE OF DBD SCOPE NUCLEAR SAFETY RELATED, TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION, OR OTHER SELECTED SYSTEMS MECH ELECT CIVIL SYSTEMS SYSTEMS STRUCTURES OCONEE 45 26 6
MCGUIRE 61 34 3
CATAWBA 60 34 3
TOTAL DBDs 166 94 12
DBD SCHEDULE
- OCONEE SYSTEMS AND STRUCTURES 13/YEAR
- MCGUIRE SYSTEMS AND STRUCTURES 16/YEAR
- CATAWBA SYSTEMS AND STRUCTURES 16/YEAR
- TOTAL 45/YEAR
- PROJECT COMPLETION - 1995
DBD PRIORITIZATION
- RISK SIGNIFICANCE/RECENT EXPERIENCE
- PLANT TESTING TRENDS
- NRC GENERIC ISSUES
- INPO SOERs
DBD SCHEDULE STATUS (1991 SCOPE --- ALL PLANTS)
FIRST SECOND THIRD FOURTH QTR 91 QTR 91 QTR 91 QTR 91 TOTAL SCHEDULED FIRST DRAFTS 9
26 19 10 64 EXPECTED FIRST DRAFTS 5
16 29 9
59 ACTUAL FIRST DRAFTS 5
16 21 SCHEDULED DBD COMPLETIONS 0
7 16 38 61 EXPECTED DBD COMPLETIONS 0
1 22 32 55 ACTUAL DBD COMPLETIONS 0
1 1
DBD AUTOMATION PROGRESS SELECTION OF TECHNICAL PUBLISHER SOFTWARE.
S/
TRANSLATION OF DBD TEXTS TO "GML".
S/
EVALUATE OPTICAL SCANNER HARDWARE.
D ESTABLISH DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT, QA POLICIES FOR ELECTRONIC DBD's.
D TRY OUT INTELLIGENT CHARACTER RECOGNITION AND 'HYPERLINKING" TO REFERENCES.
DBD SCOPE AND SCHEDULE (1991 - OCONEE)
CIVIL SECTION SCHEDULED SYSTEM OR STRUCTURE COMPLETION DATE TRANSFORMER AND SWITCHGEAR ENCLOSURE 9-4-91 CABLE TRAY SUPPORTS 12-31-91 REACTOR BUILDING AND UNIT 7-6-92 VENT
DBD SCOPE AND SCHEDULE (1991 - OCONEE)
ELECTRICAL SECTION SCHEDULED SYSTEM OR STRUCTURE COMPLETION DATE INTEGRATED CONTROL SYSTEM 12-11-90 LEE EMERGENCY POWER 9-30-91 INADEQUATE CORE COOLING MONITORING SYSTEM 9-30-91 600/208 VAC SAFETY REL. PWR.
11-15-91 230KV SWITCHYARD 125VDC POWER 11-15-91 SECURITY 12-2-91
DBD SCOPE AND SCHEDULE (1991 - OCONEE)
MECHANICAL SECTION SCHEDULED SYSTEM OR STRUCTURE COMPLETION DATE RADWASTE FACILITY 12-31-90 HIGH PRESSURE SERVICE WATER 10-1-90 CONTAINMENT ISOLATION 6-1-90 LOW PRESSURE INJECTION AND CORE FLOOD 7-1-90 LOW PRESSURE SERVICE WATER 12-31-90 FEEDWATER 8-30-91 COMPONENT COOLING 9-13-91 SERVICE AIR 12-31-91 INSTRUMENT AIR 12-31-91 CONDENSATE 12-31-91 CONTROL ROOM A/C 12-31-91 SYSTEM CLASS 11-1-91 DESIGN BASIS EVENTS 9-1-91
OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION CURRENT STATUS 9/5/91 UNIT 1 DAY 35 OF EOC 13 REFUELING OUTAGE.
SCHEDULED LENGTH 55 DAYS, PRESENT PROJECTION 50 DAYS.
UNIT 2 DAY 289 OF CONTINUOUS OPERATION UNIT 3 DAY 61 OF CONTINUOUS OPERATION
SHUTDOWN RISK MANAGEMENT CONFIGURATION CONTROL RISK MEASUREMENT/MANAGEMENT
Date ONS SHUTDOWN RISK STATUS Time DECAY HEAT REMOVAL CURRENT SG's and 2 LPI Trains 2 LPI Trains with LPSW 1 LPI Train with LPSW 1 LPI Train with the with LPSW Available Available to LPI Available to Associated Ability to Make-up. No to LPI Coolers Coolers LPI Cooler LPSW Available.
LiI.s 1
L.s
.25 ]
IA:
POWER SOURCES T, CT, CT-4, and CT-5, T or CT, CT4, and CT-5 T or CT, and CT-4 or Power from Single Trainsformers Available Transformers Available CT-5 Transformers Transformer (T, CT, and Both Main Feeder and Both Main Feeder Available or One Main CT-4, or CT-5) to Both Buses Energized Buses Energized Feeder Bus Energized Main Feeder Buses 1T J
.75
.2_
B:
CONTAINMENT Full Containment All Openings Closed Close Openings in 21 No Containment Integrity Integrity
[Refueling Closure]
Hours [Mid-Loop Closure]
s52 L.15 0
RCS INVENTORY Transfer Canal Full RV Level 80" RV Level ? 50" but < z 80" RV Level > 10" but < 50" 70 60 1 50 30 D:
NOTE:
MINIMUM RISK (GREEN) 100+
TOTAL [(A+B+C)xD]
Chart Is Not Applicable af RV Dotueled or Unit LEG END DEGRADED (YELLOW) 51 -99 Status Does Not STATUS (COLOR)
Require DHR ACTION REQUIRED (RED) 0-50 THIS SHEET IS TO BE USED FOR GENERAL GUIDANCE ONLY. STATUS MAY BE ADJUSTED DUE TO ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS OR FACTORS. PROCEDURAL AND/OR COMPENSATORY ACTIONS MAY BE REQUIRED REGUARDLESS OF THE INDICATED STATUS.
OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION Poweir System 2301525KV KeOWOC Lee Switchiyards Hydrooectric CT Generators Generators a
-001 Circuit 4
230KV Linea eee a3 525KV Lines 1
Overhead NUIUUUUUUUUUI 111 1111UIW lul Lino A"
NORMAL STARTUP UndergroundYAR souRCET SOURCE Feeder T
T STANDBY SKI SK2 Il SL2 BUSES RCP RCP Rcp RCP TO 0 U NI fr2 TO UNIT 3 lAI 181 1A2 192 MAIN FEEDER MAIN FEEDER BUSES BUSES
(
UNIT I(
(
N1 N2 MAIN FEEDER El 1
2 51 52 BUSES II USI L
TL
SHUTDOWN RISK STATUS 200
. i...............
X""""",
X:
.I 180 I.....
........* N X....
1 60 IX 140 cc co 120 co loo Ac cr 80 60 40 20 0
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10 1 2 13 Outage Day RED YELLOW GREEN
OPERATIONAL EXPERIENCE FEEDBACK PROCESS COMMON ROURCES OF OPERATIONAL EXPERIENCE INFORMATION o
10 CFR 50.72 NOTIFICATIONS (IMMEDIATE NOTIFICATIONS) o 10 CFR 50.73 NOTIFICATIONS (LERa) o REGIONAL MORNING REPORTS o
PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATIONS (PNs) o 10 CFR 21 NOTIFICATIONS o
10 CFR 50.55(e) NOTIFICATIONS o
POTENTIAL GENERIC SAFETY QUESTIONS 0
INPO 0
INCIDENT REPORTING SYSTEM (IRS)
PRIMARY REVIEW RESPONSIBILITY OFFICE FOR ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION OF OPERATIONAL DATA (AROD) o 10 CFR 50.73 NOTIFICATIONS (LERs) o IRS OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION (NRR) o 10 CFR 50.72 NOTIFICATIONS (IMMEDIATE NOTIFICATIONS) o REGIONAL MORNING REPORTS o
PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATIONS o
10 CFR 21 NOTIFICATIONS o
10 CFR 50.55(e) NOTIFICATIONS o
POTENTIAL GENERIC SAFETY QUESTIONS (PGSQs) o INPO
GENERIC COMMUNICATIONS BRANCH (OGCB) o OPERATIONAL EXPERIENCE INFORMATION 10 CFR 21 NOTIFICATIONS 10 CFR 50.55(e) NOTIFICATIONS AEOD RECOMMENDATIONS AND SUGGESTIONS POTENTIAL GENERIC SAFETY QUESTIONS IRS INPO o
NRC GENERIC COMMUNICATIONS (GCs)
NRR INFORMATION NOTICES AND BULLETINS NRR GENERIC LETTERS OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY AND SAFEGUARDS (NMSS) GCs POTENTIAL GENERIC COMMUNICATIONS TRACKING SYSTEM (PGCs)
GENERIC COMMUNICATIONS ELECTRONIC DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (E-MAIL)
EVENTS ASSESSMENT BRANCH (OAB) o OPERATIONAL EXPERIENCE INFORMATION 10 CFR 50.72 NOTIFICATIONS REGIONAL DAILY REPORTS PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATIONS IRS INPO
DAILY REVIEW AND DISSEMINATION OF INFORMATION ON EVENTS o
SYSTEMATIC, 100% REVIEW BY THE EVENTS ASSESSMENT BRANCH 10 CFR 50.72 REPORT WRITE-UPS FROM THE OPERATIONS CENTER REGIONAL DAILY REPORTS AND PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATIONS INFORMATION DIRECTLY FROM REGIONS AND/OR PROJECT MANAGERS o
NRR DIVISION DIRECTORS AND/OR REPRESENTATIVES BRIEFED BY TELEPHONE AT 8:15 AM ON SIGNIFICANT EVENTS, INCLUDING ALL REACTOR TRIPS o
EVENTS ASSESSMENT BRANCH TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL TO DISCUSS SIGNIFICANT EVENTS AT 8:50 AM INCLUDES REPRESENTATIVES FROM OEAB,
- OGCB, AEOD, THE VENDOR INSPECTION BRANCH ACTIONS ASSIGNED TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION DISCUSSIONS ON NEED FOR AUGMENTED INSPECTION TEAM OR INCIDENT INSPECTION TEAM
WEEKLY BRIEFINGS/DISCUSSIONS o
TUESDAY -
1:15 PM EVENTS MEETING REVIEWERS, PROJECT MANAGERS, SECTION LEADERS, AND BRANCH CHIEFS INTERESTED IN THE EVENTS TO BE DISCUSSED PARTICIPATE LOOK AT NEED FOR LONG-TERM FOLLOWUP OF EVENTS MAKE ASSIGNMENTS FOR LONG-TERM FOLLOWUP DRY RUN AND CRITIQUE FOR WEDNESDAY MORNING EVENTS BRIEFING ASSIGNMENT AS SIGNIFICANT EVENTS o
WEDNESDAY -
11:00 AM EVENTS BRIEFING PRIMARILY DIVISION DIRECTORS AND ABOVE AND COMMISSIONERS' ASSISTANTS NRC PERSONNEL ONLY -
REGIONS PARTICIPATE BY PHONE BRIEFING SLIDES AND ATTENDANCE LIST PLACED IN PDR
RECENT CHANGES o
RELATIONSHIP WITH INPO o
REVISION TO MANUAL CHAPTER 0720 (BULLETINS AND INFORMATION NOTICES FORMALIZE DIVISION OF BULLETIN LONG-TERM vs SHORT-TERM ACTION STANDARDIZE PORTIONS OF THE BACKFIT DISCUSSION FOR BULLETINS FORMALIZE ISSUANCE OF GENERIC COMMUNICATIONS BY NMSS
DIVISION OF OPERATIONAL EVENTS ASSESSMENT OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION C. Ernie Rossi, Director Carl Berlinger Al Chaffee Chief Chief Generic Communications Events Assessment Branch Branch Bob Dennig Dave Fischer Section Chief Section Chief BWR Section PWR Section 9 Engineers 6 Engineers 6 Engineers
X X.: X X X.: X
-X X
xxx-X-:-: : :
X.:
X X.
X x
X
- x : ::
X X
-X XXX...........
- XX X
- : : : : : : : : : : :.:.*.:.: X.
...... : : 1, X
-X -:-:-:
X.,
W
- IW I.......................
-:w:::::::w:::w::
..... -X w.....
I............
-X
-:-;-:-x X
X,
XX.
I I W:
In W
- n a OW N
.:x
-X
......X.,:"
I........
I.......
X A
IL p h.
a r
awr:
Xe,.: e.
S O '
INTRODUCTION At Oconee, we have learned that the biggest single factor in improving our availability and cutting our cost/KWH is to reduce our outage lengths. This must be accomplished without compromising the quality of the work which must be performed during these outages.
Oconee has completed 35 refueling outages and has gained considerable experience in outage management. Since 1984, outage costs and durations have consistently been reduced while continuing to improve capacity factors. Our last 7 refueling outages were 43, 42, 45, 44, 41, 44 and 44 days respectively.
OUTAGE LENGTHS OUTAGE LENGTHS 210 210 190 Lad 190 Legend 170-
-UNT1 170 UNIT 1
-- UN2 1UN 2
1
-UNflS UNITS 1304 13 z110 110 70 60 30-3 10 I
10 1
2 3
4 5
7 8
9 10 11 12 1974 1977 1980 193 1986 1989 YEAR (EOC)
The capacity factors for these units between refueling outages are 89, 96, 92, 98, 94, 96 and 100 percent, respectively. The average cost of our outages has been less than
$12,000,000. (twelve million dollars).
We believe our success cannot be derived from any one issue by itself, but is a compilation of many factors all complementing each other. We believe however, that there are four key areas which represent our philosophies and can be given the most credit for our successful outages. These areas are:
PLANNING EXPERIENCE TEAM WORK OUTAGE MANAGEMENT
PHILOSOPHICAL ELEMENTS OF OUTAGE PLANNING
- 10 Months -Scope from 5-Year Plan N 8 Months - Revised Outage Scope W 6 Months - All Major Work Defined
- 5 Months - Pre-Outage Plan Issued N
1 Month - Pre-Outage Plan Update Our planning begins with a 5-year plan which is laid out for both outage and non-outage time frames. The 5-year plan begins with our component/system experts identifying their programs for improving performance/reliability of their equipment.
Commitments, preventive maintenance programs, and modifications are also included in the 5-year plan.
Station management meets several times a year to review the 5-year plan and discuss activities that need to be added to or deleted. Removing preventative maintenance from the budget is normally not considered. Generally, during our outages, 70 percent of the work requests performed are for preventative maintenance programs.
Planning for the outage begins 10 months prior to the outage when the first publication of the outage scope is identified to the entire station. The next step is at 6 months prior to the outage. This is the point at which we established the cut off date for additional work items. Any further changes to the outage scope can be made only with the Outage Manager or Station Manager's approval.
N Three UnitSite N Low Personnel Turnover N Shared Maintenance Support 0 Repeat Vendor Support This is an area where we have a significant edge over many other utilities. As stated earlier, we have completed our 35th refueling outage. With 3 units at our station, we learn from mistakes three times faster than a single unit site.
Oconee also has a very low personnel turnover rate with our people having an average length of service of 11 years. This means that the average person at oconee has seen 24 refueling outages in their career.
During the outage we receive support from Duke's ConstructiozVMaintenance Dept.
This organization supports all three nuclear sites along with our fossil and hydro stations. These workers are experienced and well qualified to perform work at a nuclear installation.
For activities which require vendor support, we make every effort to use repeat vendors, secure long term contracts and insist on getting the same people back outage after outage.
0 Team Related Outage Goals N Outage Manager Focal Point N Idea and Experience Sharing
- Collective Success or Failure This is an area that sounds the simplest but is probably the most difficult to accomplish. We emphasize teamwork in the outage goals that we establish and assure that our Outage Manager is the focal point of our team.
OUTAGE GOALS FINAL STATUS TARGET EXCELLENT WORLD CLASS ACTUAL INJURIES 18 14 10 14
&A DOSE 285 275 260 273 ERRORS 3
1 0
3 DURATION 45 42 38 44 We encourage working together to solve problems and share as many ideas and as much experience as possible. We accept failure as a collective group and work, as a group, toward success.
- Matrix Organization N Shift Manager (STA) Support N Total Plant Focus 0 Short Outage Meetings 0 Management Support The Outage Manager has a Matrix organization of permanently assigned coordinators representing each of the major working groups. Back shift and week end outage management is accomplished by our Shift Managers who are also the Shift Technical Advisors.
During outages, virtually the whole plant focuses its attention on the outage. Our shift maintenance crews are used to maintain the other two operating units.
The outage organization conducts 2 outage meetings a day lasting approximately 30 minutes. During the morning meeting the Plant Manager and all the Superintendents are present. Our meetings are conducted by the Outage Manager. It is understood that it is the Outage Manager's outage and station management support is provided.
Frequent tours of the work sites throughout the outage is conducted by all members of management. Visiting the job site is not only important at the working level, it provides the manager with the level of detail needed to make the right decisions.
OUTAGE ACCOMPLISHMENTS An example of the work completed during a typical outage is as follows:
- 1. Perform work on 700 valves and operators.
- 2. Perform Steam Generator Eddy Current testing and associated work.
- 3. Turbine section disassembly and inspection.
- 4. Electrical inspection of breakers and switchgear.
- 6. Reactor Coolant Pump Motor PM's.
- 7. Containment Integrated Leak Rate Test.
- 8. Complete 30 plant modifications.
- 9. Perform 3600 work requests.
PLANNING Start Early and decide what needs to be done EXPERIENCE Get the same people back outage after outage TEAM WORK The outage belongs to the whole station OUTAGE MANAGEMENT Physical participation by all levels of management Good outages requires four key ingredients:
- 1. PLANNING (Start early and decide as a station what needs to be done)
- 2. EXPERIENCE (When possible get the same people back outage after outage)
- 3. TEAM WORK (No one group is responsible for the outage it belongs to the station)
- 4. OUTAGE MANAGEMENT (Management's physical participation both at the outage meeting and at the job site)
The true measure of a successful outage is not only what it costs or how short it is, but also how well the unit runs between outages.
MEASURE OF SUCCESS
-mrce Capacity Factors The true 0%C (Between Refuelings) measure of Ja successful 1 -----------
outage is not only what it costs
-0 or how short it is, but also how well the 30 unit runs 20 Nobetween 101 1O, outages.
3 1
2 3
1 2
3 UNIT