ML15244A645
| ML15244A645 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oconee, Mcguire, Catawba, McGuire  |
| Issue date: | 01/16/1991 |
| From: | Tim Reed Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9101250062 | |
| Download: ML15244A645 (35) | |
Text
January 16, 1991
,Docket Nos.
50-269, 50-270, 50-287 50-369, 50-370, 50-413 and 50-414 LICENSEE:
Duke Power Company FACILITY: Oconee, Units 1, 2 and 3 McGuire, Units 1 and 2 Catawba, Units 1 and 2
SUBJECT:
SUMMARY
OF DECEMBER 11, 1990, DPC/NRC INTERFACE MEETING On December 11, 1990, the NRC staff (including NRR Project Managers, Project Director, Region II personnel, and resident inspectors from McGuire and Catawba) met with representatives of Duke Power Company (DPC) at McGuire Nuclear Station to discuss issues of interest to both NRC and DPC organizations. Meeting attendees are listed in Enclosure 1. The agenda for the meeting is provided as Enclosure 2.
DPC provided a very informative discussion involving their ongoing efforts in Integrated Safety Assessment, FSAR Conversion to Bookmaster, Compensatory Measures, and the DPC Commercial Grade Program. In addition, the McGuire Plant Manager, Tony McConnell provided a detailed assessment of the current performance of the McGuire Nuclear Station. The slides from the various DPC presentations are provided as Enclosure 3.
Original signed by:
Timothy A. Reed, Project Manager Project Directorate 11-3 Division of Reactor Projects - I/II Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Enclosures:
As stated cc w/encls:
See next page Distribution:
See next page LA:PDII P
3 D II3 RIngram
- sa DMatthews OFFICIAL RECORD COPY Document Name:
DUKE MEETING
SUMMARY
12/11 910125006 910116 PDR ADOCK 05000269 K
FPDR
Duke Power Company cc:
Mr. A.V. Carr, Esq.
North Carolina Electric Membership Duke Power Company P.O. Box 27306 422 South Church Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27611 Charlotte, North Carolina 28242-0001 J. Michael McGarry, III, Esq.
Saluda River Electric Cooperative, Bishop, Cook, Purcell and Reynolds Inc.
1400 L Street, N.W.
P.O. Box 929 Washington, DC 20005 Laurens, South Carolina 29360 North Carolina MPA-1 Senior Resident Inspector Suite 600 Route 2, Box 179N P.O. Box 29513 York, South Carolina 29745 Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0513 Regional Administrator, Region II Ms. S.S. Kilborn U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Area Manager, Mid-South Area 101 Marietta Street, N.W., Suite 2900 ESSD Projects Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Westinghouse Electric Corp.
MNC West Tower - Bay 239 Mr. Heyward G. Shealy, Chief P.O. Box 355 Bureau of Radiological Health Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15230 South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control 2600 Bull Street County Manager of York County Columbia, South Carolina 29201 York County Courthouse York, South Carolina 29745 Ms. Karen E. Long Assistant Attorney General Richard P. Wilson, Esq.
N.C. Department of Justice Assistant Attorney General P.O. Box 692 S.C. Attorney General's Office Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 P.O. Box 11549 Columbia, South Carolina 29211 Mr. Robert G. Morgan Nuclear Production Department Piedmont Municipal Power Agency Duke Power Company 121 Village Drive.
P.O. Box 1007 Greer, South Carolina 29651 Charlotte, North Carolina 28201-1007 Mr. Alan R. Herdt, Chief Dr. John M. Barry Project Branch #3 Department of Environmental Health U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mecklenburg County 101 Marietta Street, N.W., Suite 2900 1200 Blythe Boulevard Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
,Duke Power Company
- 2 cc:
County Manager of Mecklenburg County Honorable James M. Phinney 720 East Fourth Street County Supervisor of Oconee County Charlotte, North Carolina 28202 Walhalla, South Carolina 29621 Mr. Stephen Benesole Mr. R.L. Gill, Jr.
Duke Power Company Nuclear Production Department P.O. Box 1007 P.O. Box 1007 Charlotte, North Carolina 28201-1007 Charlotte, North Carolina 28201-1007 Senior Resident Inspector Office of Intergovernmental Relations c/o U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 116 West Jones Street 12700 Hagers Ferry Road Raleigh, North Carolina 27603 Huntersville, North Carolina 28078 Mr. M.S. Tuckman Senior Resident Inspector Vice President U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Nuclear Operations Route 2, Box 610 Duke Power Company Seneca, South Carolina 27611-7687 P.O. Box 1007 Charlotte, North Carolina 28201-1007 Mr. Dayne H. Brown, Director Department of Environmental, Health and Natural Resources Division of Radiation Protection P.O. Box 27687 Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Mr. Robert B. Borsum Babcock & Wilcox Nuclear Power Division Suite 525 1700 Rockville Pike Rockville, Maryland 20852 Manager, LIS NUS Corporation 2650 McCormick Drive Clearwater, Florida 34619-1035 Mr. Paul Guill Duke Power Company Nuclear Production Department P.O. Box 1007 Charlotte, North Carolina C28201-1007 DUKE POWER COMPANY/NRC INTERFACE MEETING ATTENDANCE LIST NAME ORGANIZATION Tim Reed NRC/NRR - McGuire PM P. Kim Van Doorn NRC/SRI - McGuire G.A. Belisle NRC/RII - DRP Stan Kirslis NRC/NRR - PDII-3 D.B. Matthews NRC/NRR - PDII-3 Bob Martin NRC/NRR - PDII-3 Len Wiens NRC/NRR - PDII-3 M.S. Tuckman Duke Power/V.P. - N.O.
C.L. Hartzoll Duke Power/CNS/Compllance R.O. Sharpe Duke Power/MNS/Compliance R.L. Gill Duke Power/G.O./Compliance Steve Benesole Duke Power/G.O./Compllance Robert G. Morgan Duke Power/G.O./Compliance Paul Guill Duke Power/G.O./Compliarice Chuck Lewis Duke Power/G.O./Compllance Mary Hazeltine Duke Power/G.O./Compliance Laura Burba Duke Power/G.O./Compllance Dennis Murdock Duke Power/Design - McGuire Div.
Toney Mathews Duke Power/Design - McGuire Div.
Tom Curtis Duke Power/Oconee Compliance Perry Hopkins NRC/RI -
Catawba J.E. Snyder Duke Power/MNS Performance Todd Cooper NRC/RI -
McGuire Tom Geer Duke Power/Design - McGuire Div.
Peter Hevren Duke Power/Design - McGuire Div.
Steven Vias NRC/RI -
McGuire Pohn Zeiler NRC/RI - Catawba William Orders NRC/SRI - Catawba Milton Shymlock NRC/DRP-RII B.L. Peele Duke Power/DE - Oconee Engr. Div.
Larry Kunka Duke Power/MNS Compliance M.K. Nazar Duke Power/MNS Performance P.V. Ethington Duke Power/MNS Compliance K.R. Caraway Duke Power/Design Engr.
Bruce Travis Duke Power/MNS OPS Tom Wyke Duke Power/Design Engr.
Paul McBride Duke Power/Design Engr.
J.E. Thomas Duke Power/Design Engr.
Phil Roberson Duke Power/MNS Performance Gene Miller Duke Power/QA Tech. Support Ray Weidler Duke Power/DE - McGuire Systems Greg Hudson Duke Power/DE
DISTRIBUTION FOR MEETING
SUMMARY
DATED:
January 16, 1991 Docket File, NRC & Local PDRs PDII-3 R/F F. Miraglia 12/G/18 J. Partlow 12/G/18 S. Varga 14/E/4 G. Lainas 14/H/3 D. Matthews 9/H/3 T. Reed 9/H/3 R. Ingram 9/H/3 OGC 15/B/18 E. Jordan
.MNBB 3701 P. Kim Van Doorn RII G.A. Belisle RII S. Kirslis 9/H/3 R. Martin 9/H/3 L. Wiens 9/H/3 Perry Hopkins RII Todd Cooper RH ACRS (10)
P 315 B. Borchardt 17/G/21 Duke/NRC Interface Meeting December 11, 1990 AGENDA 7:30 Coffee 8:00 Opening Remarks 8:15 Integrated Safety Assessment Bob Futrell 9:15 FSAR Conversion to Bookmaster Bob Gill 9:45 Compensatory Measures Guidance Robert Morgan iO:30 Break 10:45 NRC Discussion Dave Matthews (NRC)
Plex/License Renewal Re-Organization 11:45 Breakout Sessions NRC Project Managers
& Resident Inspectors Duke Compliance 12:30 Lunch 1:00 McGuire Station Report Tony McConnell 2:00 Commercial Grade Program Ken Caraway DESIGN ENGINEERING OPERABILITY GUIDELINES
- DEVELOPS CONSISTENCY IN TERMINOLOGY ASSOCIATED WITH OPERABILITY EVALUATIONS
- IDENTIFIES FACTORS TO CONSIDER IN EVALUATIONS
- DESCRIBES WHEN 10CFR50.59 EVAL UATIONS, JCO'S AND REGULATORY INVOLVEMENT NEEDED
- SUMMARIZES DOCUMENTATION REQUIREMENTS
- ADDRESSES CURRENT AND PAST OPERABILITITES
DESIGN INFORMATION HIERARCHY DESIGN BASES DESIGN CRITERIA DESIGN DESCRIPTION DETAILED DESIGN INFORMATION
OPERABILITY INTERACTION OF DESIGN INFORMATION CLASSIFICATIONS LICENSING REQUIREMENTS DESIGN BASIS DESIGN DESCRIPTIONS
OPERABLE WHEN A STRUCTURE, SYSTEM, OR COMPONENT (SSC) IS CAPABLE OF PERFORMING ITS INTENDED DESIGN FUNCTION.
CONDITIONALLY OPERABLE WHEN AN SSC RELIES ON CHANGES IN ORDER TO MEET ITS INTENDED DESIGN FUNCTION. THESE CAN BE CHANGES IN THE DESIGN CRITERIA, DESIGN BASIS OR METHOD OF MEETING THE DESIGN FUNCTION.
INOPERABLE WHEN AN SSC CANNOT MEET ITS INTENDED DESIGN FUNCTION.
NoAre Technical spealituatos Pedm as to ITW Pedom an0 F
Cdesi%"
kYes Cis as JCD Yes0 aa.us CM ~ ~
~
~
~
~
aoe canonpsb AIL3
-MM
OPERABILITY LIFE CYCLE
- PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION
- PROBLEM RESOLVED IMMEDIATELY
- PERFORM PAST OPERABILITY EVALUATION
- APPROPRIATE ENFORCEMENT ACTION
- PROBLEM NOT RESOLVED IMMEDIATELY
- PERFORM OPERABILITY EVALUATION IF:
OPERABLE: CONTINUE OPERATION INOPERABLE: FOLLOW T.S. ACTION STATEMENT CONDITIONALLY OPERABLE: PERFORM NECESSARY EVALUATIONS TO ASSURE ACTIONS ARE APPROPRIATE
0N OPERA BILITY DOCUMENTA TION APPLICABLE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS CONSULTED FOR IMPACT APPLICABLE SAR SECTIONS AND DESCRIPTION OF FUNCTIONAL OR PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS AFFECTED DESCRIPTION OF LOGIC USED TO JUSTIFY CONCLUSION DISCUSS ANY APPROPRIATE RESTRICTIONS ON PLANT OPERATING MODE TO MAINTAIN CONDITIONALLY OPERABLE
QPERABILITY DOCUMENTATION (CON'T)
- CALCULATIONS SUPPORTING THE OPERABILITY EVALUATION SHOULD BE INCLUDED AS APPROPRIATE APPROPRIATE MANAGEMENT APPROVAL PIR OPERABILITY DETERMINATION COVER SHEET
DESIGN ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OPERABILITY EVALUATION Station:
Unit:
PIR Number:
Structure, system, or component (SSC) in question:
Design basis references applicable:
Technical Specification sections applicable:
The SSC in question is recommended to be:
OPERABLE CONDITIONALLY OPERABLE O NOPERABLE Operability Evaluation expiration date:
FSAR change required Yes No 10 CFR 50.59 Evaluation required [:Yes No Summary/Comments:
Originated by:
Date:
Reviewed by:
Date:
Approved by Date:
FIGURE 1'
-Operability Determination Process Station PIR' ln prblt Question NoAre Technicalye Is th SC O
D Pedown an No describedW or Ye wbt OPER
-required to
-Evaluation.
function in the SAR INP Ente theprtin Technicale
Specification.
spatd Peorm" an OPR Pelorm an ODo Operability Operability CNOa Evaluation.
Evaluation.I COND OPER Are cwonnud IoP Operations No INOP desired?
,Yes NoPerform a 10 CFR 50.59 Evaluation.
eiaaJ USO identild?
Devso at JC o
yes adequate?
Cominuedye supportd Continued Is -eu~r Develop a oprsio RWegaayNo long term are JCCWNRC eifgvn solution.
supported.
involvement.
yes OPER - Operae under theuneth COND. Conditionalpy Operat Regulator ehia 64oP.~ nc ia R*"*.
speiiair
DEFINITIONS CONDITIONALLY OPERABLE:
SITUATION WHERE A SYSTEM, SUBSYSTEM, OR COMPONENT (SSC) RELIES ON CHANGES TO A DESIGN LIMIT, DESIGN BASIS, OR METHOD OF PERFORMING A DESIGN FUNCTION (SUCH AS A COMPENSATORY ACTION) IN ORDER TO BE OPERABLE. A CONDITIONALLY OPERABLE SSC MAY BE DEGRADED, BUT THE DESIGN FUNCTION CAN STILL BE PERFORMED.
COMPENSATORY ACTION: TEMPORARY ACTION PLANNED AND IMPLEMENTED TO REPLACE AN AUTOMATIC FUNCTION OR MODIFY THE NORMAL CONFIGURATION OF AN SSC.
CONDITIONAL OPERABILITY UTILIZED BY ALL THREE STATIONS PLANNED -
UNPLANNED DEGRADATIONS ACTION EVALUATED PRIOR TO IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE TRAINING POST-ACCIDENT ENVIRONMENT RESPONSE TIME PHYSICALLY POSSIBLE COMMUNICATIONS
EXAMPLES OF CONDITIONALLY OPERABLE ABILITY OF ANNULUS VENTILATION SYSTEM TO MAINTAIN A NEGATIVE PRESSURE IN AN ACCIDENT CONDITION CONSIDERING VARIATIONS IN OUTSIDE AIR TEMPERATURE, CONDITIONALLY OPERABLE AS LONG AS OUTSIDE AIR TEMPERATURE'EXCEEDS 450F.
OPERABILITY OF YARD DRAINAGE SYSTEM WITH ONLY 68 OF 80 DRAIN COVERS IN PLACE, SG PORV POTENTIAL FAILURE NOTIFICATION FROM MANUFACTURER. EVALUATED TO BE CONDITIONALLY OPERABLE BASED UPON INCREASED, SUCCESSFUL TESTING OF VALVES UNTIL MODIFIED.
EXAMPLES OF COMPENSATORY ACTIONS MANUALLY CLOSING VALVE MANUALLY CLOSING DOOR/HATCH 87 COMP. ACTIONS FOR 1990 AT CNS 67 VENT, DOOR/HATCH RELATED (VC, VA) 15 MISSILE BARRIERS 5 OTHER
ISSUES/CONCERNS REGULATORY BASIS CIRCUMVENTING TSs NRC PERCEPTIONS PLANNED DEGRADATIONS OPERATING NECESSITY 50.59 QUESTIONS
DUKE POWER COMPANY Commercial Grade (CG) Items Program Implementation Of The NUMARC CG INITIATIVE
INDUSTRY INITIATIVE ON DEDICATION OF COMMERCIAL GRADE ITEMS APPROVED BY NUMARC BOARD OF DIRECTORS ON MARCH 8, 1989 CALLED FOR UTILITIES TO REVIEW AND, IF NECESSARY, DEVELOP OR UPGRADE CURRENT PROGRAMS TO MEET THE INTENT OF THE GUIDANCE PROVIDED IN EPRI NP-5652, GUIDELINE FOR THE UTILIZATION OF COMMERCIAL GRADE ITEMS IN NUCLEAR SAFETY RELATED APPLICATIONS (NCIG-07). REVIEW AND DEVELOPMENT TO BE ACCOMPLISHED BY DECEMBER 31, 1989.
INDUSTRY INITIATIVE ON DEDICATION OF COMMERCIAL GRADE ITEMS EPRI NP-5652 ACCEPTANCE METHODS METHOD 1 - SPECIAL TESTS AND INSPECTIONS METHOD 2 - COMMERCIAL GRADE SURVEY OF SUPPLIER METHOD 3 - SOURCE VERIFICATION METHOD 4 - ACCEPTABLE SUPPLER/ITEM PERFORMANCE RECORD
Nuclear Generating Stations Fraudulent Substandard Parts Parts Duke Shares Concerns With The NRC & The Nuclear Utility Industry.
Duke Involvement & Activity Participation In Industry Activities
-NUMARC Nuclear Plant Equipment Procurement (NPEP) Working Group
-Various EPRI/NCIG Committees & Working Groups
-NUMARC & EPRI Workshops Experience With An Evolving Program In-House
Duke Experience - Evolving Program Revised Per NUMARC INITIATIVE
I CG PROG.
ESSEM 1 90 STD.
Jan '87 STOCK ELECT.
early 80's STOCK e------d early mid 70's
Electrical Stock Items For Field Use
- -I early 70's mid 70's
. Standardized
. Safety & Non-Safety
. List Maintained For Each Site
. Acceptance Based On Past Performance At Fossil/Hydro Stations
Standard Stock I
mid 70's early 80's
. Primarily Safety Related Electrical Items
. Became Part Of QA Program
. Acceptance Based On
- Past Performance
-Duke Initiated Testing Vendor Visits/Information
ESSEM I
early 80's Jan '87 Electrical Safety Standard Equipment /Materials
- Upgraded Procedures
& Documentation
Commerical Grade Program Jan '87 1-1-90
. Company Program
. Design Engineering Assigned Lead Responsibility
. Technical Evaluations Upgraded
. QA Reviewed Each Evaluation
MAJOR STRENGTHS OF PROGRAM
. Strong Partnership Between Design, Construction, QA &
Operations Personnel
- Engineering Involvement
- Functional Testing
-Good Feedback
. Quality Vendors-Good Relations
. Prohibited Items List
CG Program Rev'd Per NUMARC INITIATIVE 1-1-90
. Defines Critical Characteristics
- Selection Of Dedication Method(s)
IMPLEMENTATION Of NUMARC CG INITIATIVE
.Items Evaluated Under Pre-1990 Programs
-Procurement Will Proceed As Was Done Prior To 1-1-90. (Basis: Documented Evaluations, Engineering Involvement, & Product Performance)
-Design Engineering Has Scheduled Documentation Upgrades To Be Completed.
Original Schedule - 1st Quarter '93, Current Target - 4th Quarter '91
IMPLEMENTATION OF NUMARC CG INITIATIVE Items Not Previously Evaluated As CG
- An Evaluation Will Be Performed And The The Item Will Be Dedicated Prior To Placing It In Service