ML15238A534
| ML15238A534 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oconee  |
| Issue date: | 02/09/1982 |
| From: | Stolz J Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Parker W DUKE POWER CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8202260373 | |
| Download: ML15238A534 (4) | |
Text
FEMUARY 9
DISTRIBUTION T hp L PDR TERA Dockets Nos. 50-269, 50-270 NSIC and 50-287 ORB#4 Rdg DEisenhut OELD AEOD Mr. William 0. Parker, Jr.
IE-3 Vice President - Steam Production ACRS-10 Duke Power Company PWagner 2
P. D. Box 33189 RIngram 422 South Church Street ZRostoczy Charlotte, North Carolina 28242 Gray File EBlackwood
Dear Mr. Parker:
HOrnstein We are continuing our review of your September 18, 1981 response to our request for additional information regarding the environmental qualifications of various equipment at the Oconee Nuclear Station.
In order to proceed with our review, we require additional inform ation on the postulated radiation levels assumed in your response.
As stated in Section 3.8 of the Safety Evaluation Report attached to our May 22, 1981 request, the radiation value guideline ingide the containment is assumed to be an integrated dose of 4 x 10.' rads.
If values lower than this guideline are used, it was requested that an analysis, including the basis and assumptions used in the analysis and sample calculations, be provided. Our review has determined that radiation values lower than the guideline were used in the Oconee analysis without proViding sufficient justification for us to base a determination of their acceptability. Therefore, we request that you provide the additional information mentioned above within 30 days of your receipt of this letter.
Since this request for information affects fewer than ten respondents, OMB clearance is not required under P.L.96-511. If you have any questions on this subject, please contact your NRC Project Manager.
Sincerely, John F. Stolz, Chief Operating Reactors Branch #4 Division of Licensing cc:
See next page 8202260373 820209 PDR ADOCK 05000269 P
PDR OFFICE)
.... L 0 R B #.4
- D PWagner; cf 2/f/82 2
/82 DATE O
3 NRC FORM 318 (10-80) NRCM O20OFF ICIAL REOR COPY USGPO: 1981-335-960
Duke Power Company cc w/enclosure(s):
Mr. William L. Porter Duke Power Company P. 0. Box 33189 422 South Church Street Office of Intergovernmental Relations Charlotte,' North Carolina 28242 116 West Jones Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27603 Oconee County Library 501 West Southbroad Street Walhalla, South Carolina 29691 Honorable James M. Phinney County Supervisor of Oconee County Walhalla, South Carolina 29621 Mr. James P. O'Reilly, Regional Administrator U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region II 101 Marietta Street, Suite 3100 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Regional Radiation Representative EPA Region IV 345 Courtland Street, N.E.
Atlanta, Georgia 30308 William T. Orders Senior Resident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Kegulatory Commi1s0io Route 2, Box 610 Seneca, South Carolina 29678 Mr. Robert B. Borsum Babcock & Wilcox Nuclear Power Generation Division Suite 220, 7910 Woodmont Avenue Bethesda, Maryland 20814 Manager, LIS NUS Corporation 2536 Countryside Boulevard Clearwater, Florida 33515 J. Michael McGarry, III, Esq.
DeBevoise & Liberman 1200 17th Street, N.W.
Washington, D. C. 20036
o0 UNITED STATES 0
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 February 9, 1982 Dockets Nos. 50-269, 50-270 and 50-287 Mr. William 0. Parker, Jr.
Vice President - Steam Production Duke Power Company P. 0. Box 33189 422 South Church Street Charlotte, North Carolina 28242
Dear Mr. Parker:
We are continuing our review of your September 18, 1981 response to our request for additional information regarding the environmental qualifications of various equipment at the Oconee Nuclear Station.
In order to proceed with our review, we require additional inform ation on the postulated radiation levels assumed in your response.
As stated in Section 3.8 of the Safety Evaluation Report attached to our May 22, 1981 request, the radiation value guideline inside the containment is assumed to be an integrated dose of 4 x 107 rads.
If values lower than this guideline are used, it was requested that an analysis, including the basis and assumptions used in the analysis and sample calculations, be provided. Our review has determined that radiation values lower than the guideline were used in the Oconee analysis without providing sufficient justification for us to base a determination of their acceptability. Therefore, we request that you provide the additional information mentioned above within 30 days of your receipt of this letter.
Since this request for information affects fewer than ten respondents, OMB clearance is not required under P.L.96-511.
If you have any questions on this subject, please contact your NRC Project Manager.
Sincerely, Jo F. Stolz, Chief 0 erating Reactors Branch #4 ivision of Licensing cc:
See next page
Duke Power Company cc w/enclosure(s):
Mr. William L. Porter Duke Power Company P. 0. Box 33189 422 South Church Street Office of Intergovernmental Relations Charlotte, North Carolina 28242 116 West Jones Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27603 Oconee County Library 501 West Southbroad Street Walhalla, South Carolina 29691 Honorable James M. Phinney County Supervisor of Oconee County Walhalla, South Carolina 29621 Mr. James P. O'Reilly, Regional Administrator U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region II 101 Marietta Street, Suite 3100 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Regional Radiation Representative EPA Region IV 345 Courtland Street, N.E.
Atlanta, Georgia 30308 William T. Orders Senior Resident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Route 2, Box 610 Seneca, South Carolina 29678 Mr. Robert B. Borsum Babcock & Wilcox Nuclear Power Generation Division Suite 220, 7910 Woodmont Avenue Bethesda, Maryland 20814 Manager, LIS NUS Corporation 2536 Countryside Boulevard Clearwater, Florida 33515 J. Michael McGarry, III, Esq.
DeBevoise & Liberman 1200 17th Street, N.W.
Washington, D. C. 20036