ML15224A763
| ML15224A763 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oconee  |
| Issue date: | 03/08/1991 |
| From: | Herdt A NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML15224A762 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-287-91-03, 50-287-91-3, NUDOCS 9103250089 | |
| Download: ML15224A763 (1) | |
Text
ENCLOSURE 1 NOTICE OF VIOLATION Duke Power Company Docket No. 50-287 Oconee Unit 3 License No. DPR-55 During the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) inspection conducted on January 27 -
February 23,
- 1991, a violation of NRC requirements was identified.
In accordance with the "General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1990),
the violation is listed below:
Technical Specification 6.4.1 requires that the Station be operated and maintained in accordance with approved procedures.
Maintenance Directive 7.5.3, Work Request Implementation, requires that disconnection/reconnection of wiring be documented and independently verified on Section V of the work request "Additional Sheet".
Contrary to the above, Maintenance Directive 7.5.3 was not followed during the performance of Work Request 55304B, Replacement and Testing of the Reactor Protection System Power Supplies Peak Filtering Capacitor, in that, wires were disconnected/reconnected during performance of the work request and not properly documented and independently verified on Section V of the work request.
This is a Severity Level IV Violation (Supplement I) and applies to Unit 3 only.
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Duke Power Company is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C. 20555 with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region II, a copy to the NRC Resident Inspector, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation (Notice).
This reply should be clearly marked as a "Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include for each violation:
(1) the reason for the violation, or, if contested, the basis for disputing the violation, (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved, (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved.
If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order may be issued to show cause why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked, or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Alan R. Herdt, Chief Reactor Projects Branch 3 Division of Reactor Projects Dated at Atlanta, Georgia this 8th day of March 1991 9103250089 910308 PDR ADOCK 05000269 17F PDR