ML15223A680
| ML15223A680 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oconee  |
| Issue date: | 10/29/1980 |
| From: | Reid R Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Parker W DUKE POWER CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8011140168 | |
| Download: ML15223A680 (4) | |
Text
tOE 2918 DISTRI N
ile -
NSIC.
TNovak p
ORB#4 Rdg RReid L PDR NRR Rdg MFairtile I TER-2 DEisenhut
- RIngram, RPurple ACRS-16 Dockets o
50-270 1E-3
. D69 JRoe ELD
.h RTedesco AEOD GLainas Gray File Mr. William 0. Parker, Jr.
HOrnstein Vice President - Steam Production EBlackWdod Duke Power Company SBlbck, RAB P. 0. Box 2178 TDMurpy, RAB 422 South Church Street DMCollin s, RAB Charlotte, North Carolina 28242
Dear Mr. Parker:
In order to complete our review of the DPC Spent Fuel Pool Modification at the Oconee Nuclear Station, UnitsNos. 1and 2, we find that we need the enclosed additional information. It is possible you may receive additional requests.
Kindly respond within 30 days of receipt of this letter with three signed originals and 37 additional copies.
Sincerely, Origial signed by Robert W. Reid Robert W. Reid, Chief Operating Reactors Branch #4 Division of Licensing
Enclosure:
Request for Additional Information cc w/enclosure:
See next page 8 0-1140____________________
PM-ORB#4:DL O FFICEO..................
RM*
MFai rtilIe/cbl SURNA E
DA~~
~~
103080/;gso8 D TE_
8...
NoR FORM 31, r9-7 NP.erv0 ou
.U GO =P t
r,4 OPINTING O)FFI'CE: 19)79-289-369
A sUNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 October 29, 1980 Dockets Nos.
50-269, 50-270 Mr. William 0. Parker, Jr.
Vice President - Steam Production Duke Power Company P. 0. Box 2178 422 South Church Street Charlotte, North Carolina 28242
Dear Mr. Parker:
In order to complete our review of the DPC Spent Fuel Pool Modification at the Oconee Nuclear Station, Units Nos. 1 and 2, we find that we need the enclosed additional information. It is possible you may receive additional requests.
Kindly respond within 30 days of receipt of this letter with three signed originals and 37 additional copies.
Sincerely, Robert W. Reid, Chief Operating Reactors Branch #4 Division of Licensing
Enclosure:
Request for Additional Information cc w/enclosure:
See next page 8011140 (,0
Duke Power.Company cc w/enclosure(s):
Mr. William L. Porter Duke Power Company P. 0. Box 2178 422 South Church Street Office of Intergovernmental Relations Charlotte, North Carolina 28242 116 West Jones Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27603 Oconee Public Library 201 South Spring Street Walhalla, South Carolina 29691 Honorable James M. Phinney County Supervisor of Oconee County Walhalla, South Carolina 29621 Director, Criteria and Standards Division Office of Radiation Programs (ANR-460)
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, D. C. 20460 U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Region IV Office ATTN:
EIS COORDINATOR 345 Courtland Street, N.E.
Atlanta, Georgia 30308 Mr. Francis Jape U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P. 0. Box 7 Seneca, South Carolina 29678 Mr. Robert B. Borsum Babcock & Wilcox Nuclear Power Generation Division Suite 420, 7735 Old Georgetown Road Bethesda, Maryland 20014 Manager, LIS NUS Corporation 2536 Countryside Boulevard Clearwater, Florida 33515 J. Michael McGarry, III, Esq.
DeBevoise & Liberman 1200 17th Street, N.W.
Washington, D. C. 20036
IeF 0
Enclosure REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OCONEE UNITS NOS. 1 & 2 SPENT FUEL POOL MODIFICATIONS, (1) Table 5.1-1 of the July 1, 1980 submittal provides an estimate of 22.7 person rems as your ALARA dose during reracking of the SFP. Please prepare an addi tional table that details the breakdown of this collective dose equivalent in terms of numbers of individuals, their occupancy times and the average dose rates in the work area of each work group for each operation. The for mat may be similar to your 4/20/79 response to the staff question 22 sub mitted during your first SFP modification (i.e., Table 5.2-1 revised).
(2) Section 5.2 states that disposal alternatives evaluated for the contaminated racks included burial, with or without compaction, and storage on-site until reuse or plant decommissioning. A decision has been made to send decontam inated intact racks off-site for burial contingent upon their contamination levels. -.Please expand upon this commitment as follows:
(a)
What radiation levels (mR/hr) will be used as the basis for your deci sion for shipping the racks off-site for burial?
(b) If low level burial space is at a premium at the burial site so that you may be required to cut-up and package the contaminated SFP racks to reduce the burial volume, please provide the person-rems that may be incurred from both shipping alternatives (i.e., shipping intact vs.
cutting-up and packaging the racks).