ML15218A268

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Forwards SE Accepting Flaw Indications in 23 & 63 CRDM Penetration Nozzles for Service Over Next Two Operating Cycles for Plant Operation
ML15218A268
Person / Time
Site: Oconee Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 12/11/1996
From: Labarge D
NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned)
To: Hampton J
DUKE POWER CO.
Shared Package
ML15218A269 List:
References
TAC-M95291, NUDOCS 9612160144
Download: ML15218A268 (3)


Text

Mr. J.*W. Hampton December 11, 1996

  • Vice President, Ocone ite Duke Power CompAny*'

P. 0. Box 1439 Seneca, SC 29679

SUBJECT:

STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF CONTROL ROD DRIVE MECHANISM PENETRATION NOZZLES NO. 23 AND 63 -

OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION UNIT 2 (TAC No.

M95291)

Dear Mr. Hampton:

On April 9-11, 1996, the Duke Power Company (DPC) performed re-inspections of the No. 23 and No. 63 Control Rod Drive Mechanism (CRDM) penetration nozzles at the Oconee Nuclear Station (ONS) Unit 2. The re-inspections were part of your routine refueling activities for the Unit 2 End-of-Cycle 15 (spring 1996) refueling outage.

By letter dated April 30, 1996, DPC submitted a safety assessment (flaw evaluation) of these nozzles. This evaluation was supplemented with additional information by letters dated May 22 and October 9, 1996.

The staff has reviewed your assessment of the penetration nozzles, as outlined in the enclosed safety evaluation. This evaluation is based, in part, on observations of the staff who were present for the CRDM penetration nozzle examinations in April 1996, as well as on your flaw evaluation submittals.

Based on our review of this information, the staff has concluded that the flaw indications in No. 23 and No. 63 CRDM penetration nozzles will be acceptable for service over the next two operating cycles for plant operation; i.e.,

operation of the ONS Unit 2 plant for operating cycles 16 and 17.

Sincerely, Original signed by:

-David E. LaBarge, Senior Project Manager 9&12 160144 9612 1 Project Directorate II-2 PDR ADOCK 05000270 Division of Reactor Projects - I/II P

PDR Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-270

Enclosure:

Safety Evaluation, cc:

See next page Distribution:

Docket File LBerry PUBLIC DLaBarge PD 11-2 Rdg:

JMedoff SVarga OGr JZwolinski J

ACRS HBerkow EMerschoff, RJI RCrlenjak, RII 13 00508 To receive a copy of this document, Indicate in the box:

"C" = Copy without attachment/enclosure "E" = Copy with attachment/enclosure "N" = No copy OFFICE PDII-

/

E PDII-2/LA\\

D:P NAME

-DLaB

.cn LBerry Her DATE 12 /io/96 17/ 10/96

/96//

/96

/ /96 DOCUMENT NAME: G:\\OCONEE\\0CO95291.LTR OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-)001 December 11, 1996 Mr. J. W. Hampton Vice President, Oconee Site Duke Power Company P. 0. Box 1439 Seneca, SC 29679

SUBJECT:

STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF CONTROL ROD DRIVE MECHANISM PENETRATION NOZZLES NO. 23 AND 63 - OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION UNIT 2 (TAC No.

M95291)

Dear Mr. Hampton:

On April 9-11, 1996, the Duke Power Company (DPC) performed re-inspections of the No. 23 and No. 63 Control Rod Drive Mechanism (CRDM) penetration nozzles at the Oconee Nuclear Station (ONS) Unit 2. The re-inspections were part of your routine refueling activities for the Unit 2 End-of-Cycle 15 (spring 1996) refueling outage.

By letter dated April 30, 1996, DPC submitted a safety assessment (flaw evaluation) of these nozzles. This evaluation was supplemented with additional information by letters dated May 22 and October 9, 1996.

The staff has reviewed your assessment of the penetration nozzles, as outlined in the enclosed safety evaluation. This evaluation is based, in part, on observations of the staff who were present for the CRDM penetration nozzle examinations in April 1996, as well as on your flaw evaluation submittals.

Based on our review of this information, the staff has concluded that the flaw indications in No. 23 and No. 63 CRDM penetration nozzles will be acceptable for service over the next two operating cycles for plant operation; i.e.,

operation of the ONS Unit 2 plant for operating cycles 16 and 17.

Sincerely, David E. LaBarge, Senior Project Manager Project Directorate 11-2 Division of Reactor Projects -

I/II Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-270

Enclosure:

Safety Evaluation cc:

See next page

Mr. J. W. Hampton Duke Power Company Oconee Nuclear Station cc:

Mr. Paul R. Newton Mr. Ed Burchfield Legal Department (PB05E)

Compliance Duke Power Company Duke Power Company 422 South Church Street Oconee Nuclear Site Charlotte, North Carolina 28242-0001 P. 0. Box 1439 Seneca, South Carolina 29679 J. Michael McGarry, III, Esquire Winston and Strawn Ms. Karen E. Long 1400 L Street, NW.

Assistant Attorney General Washington, DC 20005 North Carolina Department of Justice Mr. Robert B. Borsum P. 0. Box 629 Framatome Technologies Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 Suite 525 1700 Rockville Pike Mr. G. A. Copp Rockville, Maryland 20852-1631 Licensing - EC050 Duke Power Company Manager, LIS 526 South Church Street NUS Corporation Charlotte, North Carolina 28242-0001 2650 McCormick Drive, 3rd Floor Clearwater, Florida 34619-1035 Mr. Dayne H. Brown, Director Division of Radiation Protection Senior Resident Inspector North Carolina Department of U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Environment, Health and Route 2, Box 610 Natural Resources Seneca, South Carolina 29678 P. 0. Box 27687 Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Regional Administrator, Region II U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 101 Marietta Street, NW. Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Max Batavia, Chief Bureau of Radiological Health South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control 2600 Bull Street Columbia, South Carolina 29201 County Supervisor of Oconee County Walhalla, South Carolina 29621