ML15218A260

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Ser,Agreeing W/Determination That Hydrostatic Testing of Welds Would Result in Hardship W/O Compensating Increase in Level of Quality & Safety for Second 10-yr ISI Interval
ML15218A260
Person / Time
Site: Oconee Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 04/12/1995
From: Berkow H
NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned)
To: Hampton J
DUKE POWER CO.
Shared Package
ML15218A261 List:
References
NUDOCS 9504170423
Download: ML15218A260 (3)


Text

Mr. J. W. Hampton Vice President, Ocone fite April 12, 1995 Duke Power Company P. 0-. Box 1439 Seneca, SC 29679

SUBJECT:

REQUEST FOR RELIEF NO. 94-06 FOR OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION, UNIT 2 (TAC NO. 91173)

Dear Mr. Hampton:

By letter dated July 18, 1994, you submitted Request for Relief No. 94-06 from the hydrostatic testing requirements of the ASME Code for the Unit 2 second 10-year inservice inspection (ISI) and for the testing of welds following the replacement of the Main Steam System and Steam Drain System valves. The weld joints are on Unit 2 piping which is unisolable from the steam generators. In lieu of the Code-required hydrostatic testing, you propose to perform the alternate examinations specified by Code Cases N-498 and N-416-1.

The staff has reviewed your request and our Safety Evaluation is enclosed. We agree with your determination that hydrostatic testing of the welds would result in hardship without a compensating increase in the level of quality and safety. We also find that the alternative testing specified in Code Cases N-498 and N-416-1 would provide an acceptable level of quality and safety.

Accordingly, pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55a(a)(3)(ii), the alternative testing proposed in Relief Request No. 94-06 is authorized.

Sincerely, Original signed by:

Herbert N. Berkow, Director Project Directorate II-C23 Division of Reactor Projects -

I/II Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-270

Enclosure:

Safety Evaluation cc w/encl: See next page DISTRIBUTION Docket File J. Zwolinski.

PUBLIC OGC PD#If2 Reading File E. Jordan, D/AEOD W. Russell/F. Miraglia

'G.: H iT,IR (2)

R. Zimmerman ACRS (4)

R. Spessard, D/DOTS OPA J. Lieberman,.D/OE OC/LFDCB S. Varga G. Tracy, EDO E. Merschoff, RI J. Crlenjak, RII DOCUMENT NAME:

G:\\OCONEE\\0CRR9406 To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the box:

"C"

= Copy without attachment/enclosure "E" = Copy with attachment/enclosure "I = No copy OFFICE LA:PD2&DRP h, E PM:PD2VDRPE E PM:PD2 D E E

OGC D:PD2A EMCB NAME LBERRY SKIRSLIS LWIENS

//t HBERKO V Strosnide DATE 0 /95

/q

/95

/95

-'i95 1 /

/95 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY 0

t 9504170423 950412 PDR ADOCK 05000270

>___PDR LJIJY L" _;L A~UUL

0 ;RREG1e 0

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-001 9

April 12, 1995 Mr. J. W. Hampton Vice President, Oconee Site Duke Power Company P. 0. Box 1439 Seneca, SC 29679

SUBJECT:

REQUEST FOR RELIEF NO. 94-06 FOR OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION, UNIT 2 (TAC NO. 91173)

Dear Mr. Hampton:

By letter dated July 18, 1994, you submitted Request for Relief No. 94-06 from the hydrostatic testing requirements of the ASME Code for the Unit 2 second 10-year inservice inspection (ISI) and for the testing of welds following the replacement of the Main Steam System and Steam Drain System valves. The weld joints are on Unit 2 piping which is unisolable from the steam generators. In lieu of the Code-required hydrostatic testing, you propose to perform the alternate examinations specified by Code Cases N-498 and N-416-1.

The staff has reviewed your request and our Safety Evaluation is enclosed. We agree with your determination that hydrostatic testing of the welds would result in hardship without a compensating increase in the level of quality and safety. We also find that the alternative testing specified in Code Cases N-498 and N-416-1 would provide an acceptable level of quality and safety.

Accordingly, pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55a(a)(3)(ii), the alternative testing proposed in Relief Request No. 94-06 is authorized.

Sincerely, H bert N. Berkow, D rector Project Directorate 11-2 Division of Reactor Projects -

I/II Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-270

Enclosure:

Safety Evaluation cc w/encl:

See next page

Mr. j. W. Hampton Duke Power Company Oconee Nuclear Station cc:

A. V. Carr, Esquire Mr. Ed Burchfield Duke Power Company Camp]iance 422 South Church Street Duke Power Company Charlotte, North Carolina 28242-0001 Oconee Nuclear Site P. 0. Box 1439 J. Michael McGarry, III, Esquire Seneca, South Carolina 29679 Winston and Strawn 1400 L Street, NW.

Ms. Karen E. Long Washington, DC 20005 Assistant Attorney General North Carolina Department of Mr. Robert B. Borsum Justice Babcock & Wilcox P.O. Box 629 Nuclear Power Division Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 Suite 525 1700 Rockville Pike Mr. G. A. Copp Rockville, Maryland 20852 Licensing -

ECO50 Duke Power Company

,,Manager, LIS 526 South Church Street NUS Corporation Charlotte, North Carolina 28242-0001 2650 McCormick Drive, 3rd Floor Clearwater, Florida 34619-1035 DAyne H. Brown, Director Division of Radiation Protection Senior Resident Inspector North Carolina Department of U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Environment, Health and Route 2, Box 610 Natural-Resources Seneca, South Carolina 29678 P. 0. Box 27687 Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Regional Administrator, Region II U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 101 Marietta Street, NW. Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Max Batavia, Chief Bureau of Radiological Health South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control 2600 Bull Street Columbia, South Carolina 29201 County Supervisor of Oconee County Walhalla, South Carolina 29621