ML15125A097

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment to Permanently Extend the Frequency of the Containment Integrated Leak Rate Test
ML15125A097
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point 
(DPR-064)
Issue date: 05/06/2015
From: Pickett D
Plant Licensing Branch 1
To:
Entergy Nuclear Operations
Pickett D
References
TAC MF5382
Download: ML15125A097 (4)


Text

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 Vice President, Operations Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

Indian Point Energy Center 450 Broadway, GSB P.O. Box 249 Buchanan, NY 10511-0249 May 6, 2015

SUBJECT:

INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NO. 2 - REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING LICENSE AMENDMENT TO PERMANENTLY EXTEND THE FREQUENCY OF THE CONTAINMENT INTEGRATED LEAK RATE TEST (TAC NO. MF5382)

Dear Sir or Madam:

By letter dated December 9, 2014, Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (the licensee), submitted a license amendment request to permanently extend the frequency of the containment integrated leak rate test for Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit No. 2 from once every 10 years to once every 15 years.

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff is reviewing the submittal and has determined that additional information is needed to complete its review. The specific questions are found in the enclosed request for additional information (RAI). Based on our discussions we understand that a response to the RAI will be provided within 30 days of the date of this letter.

Please contact me at (301) 415-1364 if you have any questions on this issue.

Docket No. 50-247

Enclosure:

Request for Additional Information cc w/encl: Distribution via Listserv Sincerely, Douglas V. Pickett, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 1-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION EXTENSION OF THE CONTAINMENT INTEGRATED LEAK RATE TEST ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC.

INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NO. 2 DOCKET NO. 50-247 Probabilistic Risk Assessment Licensing Branch Question 1 Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) 94-01, Revision 2-A (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML100620847), "Industry Guideline for Implementing Performance-Based Option of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix J," states that plant-specific confirmatory analyses are required when extending the Type A integrated leak rate test (ILRT) interval beyond ten years and that the assessment should be performed using the approach and methodology described in Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) Technical Report (TR) 1009325, Revision 2-A 1, "Risk Impact Assessment of Extended Integrated Leak Rate Testing Intervals" (ADAMS Accession No. ML14024A045).

EPRI TR 1009325, Revision 2-A, does not address plant-specific probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) quality. In the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) safety evaluation, dated June 25, 2008 (ADAMS Accession No. ML081140105), the NRC staff stated, in part, that:

Licensee requests for a permanent extension of the ILRT surveillance interval to 15 years pursuant to NEI TR 94-01, Revision 2, and EPRI Report No. 1009325, Revision 2, will be treated by NRC staff as risk-informed license amendment requests. Consistent with information provided to industry in Regulatory Issue Summary 2007-06, "Regulatory Guide 1.200 Implementation," the NRC staff will expect the licensee's supporting Level 1/[large early release frequency] LERF PRA to address the technical adequacy requirements of [Regulatory Guide]

RG 1.200, Revision 1... Any identified deficiencies in addressing this standard shall be assessed further in order to determine any impacts on any proposed decreases to surveillance frequencies. If further revisions to RG 1.200 are issued which endorse additional standards, the NRC staff will evaluate any application referencing NEI TR 94-01, Revision 2, and EPRI Report No.

1009325, Revision 2, to examine if it meets the PRA quality guidance per the RG 1.200 implementation schedule identified by the NRC staff.

According to Regulatory Issue Summary 2007-06, the NRC staff expects that licensees fully address all scope elements with Revision 2 of RG 1.200 (ADAMS Accession No. ML090410014) by the end of its implementation period (i.e., one year after the issuance of Revision 2). RG 1.200, Revision 2, endorses, with exceptions and clarifications, the combined American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)/American Nuclear Society (ANS) PRA standard (ASME/ANS RA-Sa-2009).

1 EPRI TR-1009325, Revision 2-A, is also identified as EPRI TR-1018243.

Enclosure In the application dated December 9, 2014 (ADAMS Accession No. ML14353A015), the licensee stated that "An internal comparison of the ASME standard to the combined ASME/ANS standard confirmed that there were few substantive changes to the internal events portion of the standard, although the expected level of documentation was increased in some cases."

However, based on this statement alone, it is unclear if a full gap assessment (i.e., for each of the supporting requirements) was performed for the Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit No. 2 (IP2) internal events PRA model to the latest endorsed version of the PRA standard.

Given that the implementation date of RG 1.200, Revision 2, was April 2010 and the license amendment request application was submitted in December 2014, identify and address any gaps between the IP2 PRA model used in this application and the RG 1.200, Revision 2, requirements that are relevant to this submittal; or explain why addressing the requirements would have no impact on this application.

ML15125A097 OFFICE DORL/LPLl-1/PM DORL/LPLl-1/LA NAME DPickett KGoldstein DATE 05/06/2015 05/05/2015 RidsNrrPMlndianPoint RidsAcrsAcnw _MailCTR ABurritt, R 1 AP LA/BC DORL/LPLl-1 /BC (A)

HHamzehee MDudek by memo dated 04/23/2015 05/06/2015