ML15118A292

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Violation from Insp on 980322-0502.Violation Noted:During 960314-980401,licensee Failed to Correct Condition Adverse to Quality in That Instances of Failure to Do QA Review Prior to Issuance of Instructions Occurred
ML15118A292
Person / Time
Site: Oconee  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 06/01/1998
From:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML15118A291 List:
References
50-269-98-05, 50-269-98-5, 50-270-98-05, 50-270-98-5, 50-287-98-05, 50-287-98-5, NUDOCS 9806160287
Download: ML15118A292 (2)


Text

NOTICE OF VIOLATION Duke Energy Corporation Docket No. 50-269,270,287 Oconee 1, 2, and 3 License No. DPR-38,47,55 During an NRC inspection conducted from March 22 to May 2, 1998. two violations of NRC requirements were identified. In accordance with the "General Statement of Policy and Procedures for NRC Enforcement Actions,"

NUREG 1600, the violations are listed below:

A.

10 CFR 50. Appendix B, Criterion XVI, Corrective Action, requires that measures be established to assure that conditions adverse to quality, such as failures, malfunctions,.deficiencies, deviations, defective material and equipment, and nonconformances are promptly identified and corrected.

Contrary to the above, between March 14, 1996. and April 1, 1998, the licensee failed to correct a condition adverse to quality in that repetitive examples of a failure.to perform a quality assurance review prior to issuance of engineering instructions occurred. Specifically, the licensee identified three temporary modifications and twelve minor modifications, which were approved during that period, with engineering instructions that did not receive the required quality assurance review prior to issuance.

This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I).

B. 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B. Criterion V. Instructions, Procedures, and Drawings, requires that activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by documented instructions, procedures, or drawings, of a type appropriate to the circumstances, and shall be accomplished in accordance with these instructions, procedures, or drawings.

Contrary to the above, as of February 11, 1998, approved Quality Assurance Piping Layout configuration control drawings were not followed in that the installed Unit 2 plant vent airborne particulate and iodine sampler radiation indicating alarm (RIA-43. RIA-44) inlet sample line was not constructed following bend radius as specified in drawing 0-440A. Revision 37 and 0-440B, Revision 38. Piping Layout Plan Elevation 838'-0" Auxiliary Building, dated October 9, 1970.

This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I).

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Duke Energy Corporation, is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN.:

Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555, with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region II, and a copy to the NRC 9806160287 980601 PDR ADOCK 05000269 G

.PDR

Notice of Violation 2

Resident Inspector, Oconee Nuclear Station, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation (Notice). This reply should be clearly marked as a "Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include for each violation: (1) the reason for the violation, or, if contested, the basis for disputing the violation; (2) the corrective steps that will be taken and the results achieved; (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations; and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved.

Your response may reference or include previous docketed correspondence, if the correspondence adequately addresses the required response. If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an Order or a Demand for Information may be issued as to why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked, or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.

If you contest this enforcement action, you should also provide a copy of your response to the Director, Office of Enforcement, U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555-0001.

Because your response will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room (PDR), to the extent possible, it should not include any personal privacy, proprietary, or safeguards information so that it can be placed in the PDR without redaction. If personal privacy or proprietary information is necessary to provide an acceptable response, then please provide a bracketed copy of your response that identifies the information that should be protected. and a redacted copy of your response that deletes such information. If you request withholding of such material, you must specifically identify the portions of your response that you seek to have withheld and provide in detail the bases for-your claim of withholding (e.g., explain why the disclosure of information will create an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy or provide the information required by 10 CFR 2.790(b) to support a request for withholding confidential commercial or financial information). If safeguards information is necessary to provide an acceptable response, please provide the level of protection described in 10 CFR 73.21.

Dated at Atlanta, Georgia this 1st day of June 1998