ML14308A598

10/20/2014, Summary of Telephone Conference Call Held Between NRC and DTE Electric Co., Concerning Requests for Additional Information Pertaining to Fermi, Unit 2 License Renewal Application

ML14308A598
Person / Time
Site:	Fermi
Issue date:	11/20/2014
From:	Michael Wentzel Division of License Renewal
To:
Wentzel M
References
TAC MF4064
Download: ML14308A598 (6)

Text

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 November 20, 2014 LICENSEE: DTE Electric Company FACILITY: Fermi 2

SUMMARY

OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON OCTOBER 20, 2014, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND DTE ELECTRIC COMPANY CONCERNING REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PERTAINING TO FERMI 2 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION (TAC. NO. MF4064)

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff) and representatives of DTE Electric Company held a telephone conference call on October 20, 2014, to discuss and clarify the staffs requests for additional information (RAIs) concerning Fermi 2 license renewal application. The telephone conference call was useful in clarifying the intent of the staffs RAIs. provides a listing of the participants and Enclosure 2 contains a listing of the RAIs discussed with the applicant, including a brief description on the status of the items.

The applicant had an opportunity to comment on this summary.

/RA Brian Wittick for/

Michael Wentzel, Project Manager Projects Branch 2 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-341

Enclosures:

1. List of Participants

2. List of Requests for Additional Information cc w/encls: Listserv

ML1308A598 *concurred via email OFFICE LA:RPB2:DLR PM:RPB2:DLR BC:RPB2:DLR PM:RPB2:DLR NAME IKing MWentzel BWittick MWentzel (BWittick for)

DATE 11/10/14 11/13/15 11/15/14 11/20/14

TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL FERMI 2 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION LIST OF PARTICIPANTS OCTOBER 20, 2014 PARTICIPANTS AFFILIATIONS Leslie Perkins U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)

Jeff Rikhoff NRC Michael Wentzel NRC Lynne Goodman DTE Electric Company (DTE)

Randy Westmoreland DTE Raymond Carson DTE ENCLOSURE 1

REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION OCTOBER 20, 2014 The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff) and representatives of DTE Electric Company (DTE) held a telephone conference call on October 20, 2014, to discuss and clarify the following requests for additional information (RAIs) concerning the license renewal application (LRA).

RAI # S-5 A table showing the dollar distribution (or percentage) of the Fermi 2 property tax payment and each entitys total revenue (or percent of total revenue) would be helpful. Its important to understand how dependent some of these entities are on the revenue received from the Fermi 2 property tax payment via Frenchtown Township.

Discussion: DTE requested the staff to clarify whether the staff wanted DTE to provide information on total revenue or total property tax revenue. The staff indicated that it wanted DTE to provide information regarding total property tax revenue. RAI S-5 was revised as follows:

A table showing the dollar distribution (or percentage) of the Fermi 2 property tax payment and each entitys total property tax revenue would be helpful. Its important to understand how dependent some of these entities are on the property tax revenue received from the Fermi 2 property tax payment via Frenchtown Township.

RAI # S-10 Questions regarding Attachment D, Table 3.8-5b. 2013 Property Tax Distribution Associated with Fermi 2

a. Footnote e appears to be missing in the table. Is the footnote referring to column Total Fermi Power Plant Taxes or Total Township Taxes?

b. Are the numbers under the column heading Total Township Taxes total taxes owed, property taxes owed, tax revenue from all sources, or tax revenue from property taxes alone? Please provide the percent of Total Fermi Power Plant Taxes from total revenue (or property tax revenue) by taxing jurisdiction?

c. Please explain footnote e, Due to different classifications and tax abatements, actual mills paid may not equal mills subjected to. Are you trying to say, due to parcel reclassification and tax settlement refunds [see Attachment A, Table 1 footnotes] the amount paid may not equal the amount owed? Please clarify. Does this explain why the total ($20,465,290) for the 2013 Total Fermi Power Plant Taxes column does not reflect the $821,136 in total adjustments shown in Attachment B, Table 3, Property Taxes Paid by Millage Type for tax year 2013 and Attachment A, Table 1, Fermi 2 Property Tax Distributions 2009-2013? For example, Table 1 footnotes, $155,604 parcel reclassification + $665,532 settlement refund = $821,136 total adjustments in tax year 2013. Please confirm that this is correct.

ENCLOSURE 2

Discussion: DTE requested clarification on the item b in RAI S-10, specifically whether or not the staff was asking for the percentage of total revenue, or total property tax revenue. The staff explained that for item b, the staff is requesting DTE to clarify which data is being presented in the table, and that it would be acceptable for DTE to submit either percentage of total revenue or total property tax revenue.

SUMMARY

OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON OCTOBER 20, 2014, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND DTE ELECTRIC COMPANY, CONCERNING REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PERTAINING TO FERMI 2, LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION (TAC. NO. MF4064)

DISTRIBUTION:

HARD COPY:

DLR RF E-MAIL:

PUBLIC RidsNrrDlr Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb1 Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb2 Resource RidsNrrDlrRerb Resource RidsNrrDlrRarb Resource RidsNrrDlrRasb Resource RidsNrrDlrRsrg Resource RidsNrrPMFermi Resource

---

DMeléndez-Colón MWentzel YDiaz-Sanabria BWittick CKanatas, OGC MKunowski, RIII BKemker, RIII PSmagacz, RIII VMitlyng, RIII PChandrathil, RIII HLogaras, RIII ABarker, RIII