ML14178A409

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Violation from Insp on 931018-22.Violation Noted: Four Welds on Each Support Were Missing from Supports FW-6B-73 & FW-6C-109 at Connections Between Stiffener Plates & Base Plates
ML14178A409
Person / Time
Site: Robinson Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 11/17/1993
From:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML14178A408 List:
References
50-261-93-25, NUDOCS 9312140075
Download: ML14178A409 (2)


Text

ENCLOSURE 1 NOTICE OF VIOLATION Carolina Power & Light Docket No.: 50-261 Robinson License No.: DPR-23 During an NRC inspection conducted on October 18-22, 1993, violations of NRC requirements were identified. In accordance with the "General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," the violations are listed below:

A. 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criteria X, requires that examinations, measure ments, or tests of material or products processed shall be performed where necessary to assure quality. Robinson Nuclear Plant Unit 2 Specification No. CPL-HBR2-C-011, Civil Inspection Requirements Section 6.2.3, requires that QC inspectors verify that welds are in accordance with design documents.

Contrary to the above, during this inspection, four welds on each support were missing from Support Nos. FW-6B-73 and FW-6C-109 at connections between the stiffener plates and base plates. The supports were modified by plant modification (PM) 988 in December 1990. The QC inspectors verified completion of the PM and signed off the inspection sheets.

This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I).

B. CP&L Robinson Technical Specification in Section 6.5.1, procedures, tests, and experiments, requires that written procedures shall be established, implemented, and maintained covering the activities recom mended in Appendix "A" of Regulatory Guide 1.33, Rev. 2, February 1978.

CP&L Robinson Maintenance Management Procedure No. MMM-028, Control of Field Issued Material, requires the following:

Section 5.4.1.1 -

This number (Purchase Order Number) is the primary identification for traceability of most material used.

Section 5.4.1.2 All identification transfer operations shall include the transfer of this number (Purchase Order Number) unless authorized otherwise by Maintenance or Modifi cation Implementation Unit (MIU) Supervision.

Section 5.9.2 Maintenance and MIU Supervision shall ensure that the proper material is used and installation documents are properly marked to indicate the job on which the material was installed.

9312140075 931117 PDR ADOCK 05000261 G

PDR

Carolina Power & Light Co.

2 Docket No.: 50-261 Robinson License No.: DPR-23 Contrary to the above, the purchase order number marked on pipe clamps on the east side of Pipe Support FW-7-33C (Special Support SS-2233) was different than the number recorded in the document signed off by the installer and the QC inspector.

This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I).

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, CP&L is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN:

Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C. 20555 with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region II, and a copy to the NRC Resident Inspector at the facility that is the subject of this Notice, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation (Notice). This reply should be clearly marked as a "Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include for each violation: (1) the reason for the violation, or, if contested, the basis for disputing the violation, (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved, (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved.

If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order or Demand for Information may be issued as to why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked, or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.

Dated at Atlanta, Georgia this 17th day of November 1993