ML14178A354
| ML14178A354 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Robinson  |
| Issue date: | 06/08/1993 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML14178A353 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-261-93-10, NUDOCS 9307020164 | |
| Download: ML14178A354 (1) | |
Text
ENCLOSURE 1 NOTICE OF VIOLATION Carolina Power and Light Company Docket No.:
50-261 H. B. Robinson Unit 2 License No.:
DPR-23 During the NRC inspection conducted on April 17 - May 14, 1993, violations of NRC requirements were identified. In accordance with the "General Statement of Policy and Procedure For NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C, the violations are listed below:
10 CFR 50 Appendix B Criterion V requires that activities affecting quality be prescribed by documented procedures of a type appropriate to the circumstances. SP-1198 was established on April 10, 1993, to verify that AMSAC was operational after repairs had been performed on the system. AMSAC was installed to meet the risk reduction requirements of 10 CFR 50.62.
Contrary to the above, activities affecting quality were not prescribed by procedures appropriate to the circumstances, in that, SP-1198 failed to provide instructions to verify proper operation of the microprocessor used to repair the A channel of AMSAC. On April 23, subsequent testing verified that the microprocessor installed in the A channel was operating properly.
This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I).
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Carolina Power and Light Company is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the U. S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555, with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region II, and a copy to the NRC Resident Inspector, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation (Notice). This reply should be clearly marked as a "Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include for each violation:
(1) the reason for the violation, or, if contested, the basis for disputing the violation, (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved, (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved. If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order may be issued to show cause why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked, or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.
Dated at Atlanta, Georgia this 8th day of June 1993 9307020164 930608 PDR ADOCK 05000261 PDR