ML14176A691
| ML14176A691 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Robinson  |
| Issue date: | 10/20/1981 |
| From: | Bemis P, Upright C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML14176A689 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-261-81-25, NUDOCS 8111170489 | |
| Download: ML14176A691 (4) | |
See also: IR 05000261/1981025
Text
UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION II
101 MARIETTA ST., N.W., SUITE 3100
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303
Report No. 50-261/81-25
Licensee: Carolina Power and Light Company
411 Fayettevilla Street
Raleigh, NC
27602
Facility Name:
H. B. Robinson
Docket No. 50-261
License No. DPR-23
Inspection at H. B. Robinson site near Hartsville, South Carolina and the CP&L
corporate offices at Raleigh, North
rolina
Inspector:
Z-o
/
P. R. Bemis
ate Si/gned
Approved by:
C. M. Upright, e ion
ief
Da e Si ned
Engineering In ction ranch
Engineering and Technical Inspection Division
SUMMARY
Inspection on August 30 - September 4 and September 14-18, 1981
Areas Inspected
This routine, unannounced inspection involved 90 inspector-hours on site in the
areas of QA program review, procedures, personnel qualifications, offsite support
staff, and nonroutine reporting program.
Results
Of the five areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified.
8111170499 811030
PDR ADOCK 05000261
G
REPORT DETAILS
1. Persons Contacted
Licensee Employees
H. Banks, Manager, Corporate Quality Assurance
C. Bethea, Training Supervisor
- F. Bishop, Senior Engineer
R. Chambers, Maintenance Supervisor
R. Connolly, Assistant to General Manager
C. Crawford, Manager, Operations and Maintenance
J. Curley, Manager, Technical Support
W. Dorman, Lead Auditor, Corporate Performance Evaluation Team
W. Flanagan, Project Engineer
W. Ford, Director of Construction Procurement
- F. Gilman, Senior Specialist, Regulatory Compliance
- I. Johnson, Principle Quality Assurance Specialist
J. Johnson, Assistant to Manager Quality Assurance
H. Lipa, Assistant to Vice President Nuclear Operations
F. Lowrey, Operations Supervisor, Unit 2
A. McCarley, Principle Engineer Onsite Nuclear Safety
C. Mosley, Manager Operations Quality Assurance
M. Paige, Engineering Supervisor
W. Price, Principle Engineer, Electrical
C. Rose, Senior Quality Assurance Specialist
D. Stadler, Senior Specialist, Regulatory Compliance
- R. Starkey, General Plant Manager
- D. Waters, Principle Engineer Operations
B. Watkins, Administrative Supervisor
- C. Wright, Specialist, Regulatory Compliance
- H. Young, Director, Site Quality Assurance/Quality Control
Other licensee employees contacted included four craftsmen, six technicians,
eight operators, two security force members,
four office personnel,
one
maintenance planner, two instructors, three corporate QA auditors, three
QA/QC auditors and three engineers.
NRC Resident Inspector
- S..
Weise
- Attended exit interview
2. Exit Interview
The inspection scope and findings were summarized on September 18,
1981 with
those persons indicated in paragraph 1 above.
The licensee acknowledged the
findings.
2
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings
a.
(Closed) Unresolved (261/79-19-10):
Inadequate duplicate QA records
storage. The licensee met the NRC position stated in the 79-19 report
by providing duplicate storage of QA records and vendor surveillance
audit records on the 6th and 18th floors which exceeds the six floor
separation criteria.
b.
(Open) Unresolved (261/79-19-06):
Failure to establish a program of
trend evaluation. This item was reviewed and found close to comple
tion.
The electrical portion has not been developed as of this
inspection,
but the licensee stated that the program should be
completed by October and procedures completed by the end of December
1981.
This item has been reviewed in three previous inspections
(261/80-06,
22,
25)
and due to various problems, dates given by the
licensee have not been met.
This matter is .addressed in the trans
mittal letter for this report.
The following terms are defined and used throughout this report:
AI
Administrative Instruction
ANSI
American National Standards Institute
Abnormal Procedure
NRC
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
NRC Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
OP
Operating Procedure
QA/QC
Quality Assurance/Quality Control
PNSC
Plant Nuclear Safety Committee
Reactor Operator
Senior Reactor Operator
4. Unresolved Items
Unresolved items are matters about which more information is required to
determine whether they are acceptable or may involve violations or devia
tions.
New unresolved items identified during this inspection are discussed
in paragraph 9.
5. QA Program Review (35701)
References:
(a) Carolina Power and Light (CP&L)
letter, Serial Number
OQA-81-026, dated 3/18/81 to NRC Division of Licensing
(b) CQAD-3,
Procedure
for
Collection,
Storage,
and
Maintenance of QA Audit Records, Revision 0 dated 4/81
Reference (a) outlines a complete change in the CP&L QA/QC organization to
include both corporate and site organizations.
In addition, it consolidates
and restates a-11 CP&L commitments in QA/QC.
Individuals at the site and
3
corporate offices were questioned as to their understanding of the new
organization and commitments made in reference (a).
The Corporate QA/QC
Performance Evaluation Team was on site prior to and during this inspection.
Most of the concerns the inspector found had already been identified by the
CP&L corporate team.
The inspector also observed the CP&L team in the
performance of their audit.
Based on this review, one open item and two inspector followup items were
identified.
a. Failure to Maintain Qualification Examinations
ANSI N45.2.23 requires examinations to be given to lead auditors and
states that these examinations may be administered by an independent
certifying agency but must be maintained by the employer.
CP&L is
using vendor training and examinations as a portion of the qualifica
tion for lead auditors. Upon completion of the course the attendee is
presented a Certificate of Completion, but the licensee has not been
maintaining or reviewing for quality the vendor administered examina
tions. Until such time that the licensee obtains copies of the
examinations and reviews them for adequacy, this will be carried as an
inspector followup item (261/81-25-01).
b.
Conflict Between Procedure and Implementation
Reference (b) states that the duplicate storage of QA records in the
corporate office is maintained on the 9th and 18th floors, when in
fact the records are stored on the 6th and 18 floors.
The licensee
committed to change the procedure to correctly describe the record
location.
c. Procedure for 10 CFR 21 Evaluations
AI 13.4, Instruction for Compliance to 10 CFR 21,
Revision 13 dated
8/81, states that QAP 9 shall be used for 10 CFR 21 evaluations. When
the QA/QC Department reorganized, the site QA/QC group rewrote all of
their procedures and gave part of their 10 CFR 21 evaluation responsi
bility to the site Regulatory Compliance Group.
(1) QAP 9 was cancelled and replaced by QAP 104, 10 CFR 21 Screening,
Revision 1 dated 8/81
(2) QAP 104 does not delineate the 10 CFR 21 evaluations for which
QA/QC is responsible versus Regulatory Compliance responsibility.
(3)
Regulatory Compliance is using QAP 9 to make their required
10 CFR 21 evaluations. The licensee provided a target date of
January 1, 1982 for changing AI 13.4 to show the correct procedure