ML14175A908
| ML14175A908 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Robinson |
| Issue date: | 01/20/1994 |
| From: | Merschoff E NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | Dietz C CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9402080124 | |
| Download: ML14175A908 (54) | |
Text
JAN 20 1994 Docket No.:
50-261 License No.:
DPR-23 Carolina Power and Light Company ATTN: Mr. C. R. Dietz Vice President H. B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant Unit 2 P. 0. Box 790 Hartsville, SC 29550-0790 Gentlemen:
SUBJECT:
MEETING
SUMMARY
- ROBINSON UNIT 2 This refers to the management meeting conducted in the Region II Office on January 10, 1994. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the status of readiness to restart the Robinson Plant. A list of attendees and a copy of your slides are enclosed.
In accordance with Section 2.790 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter and its enclosures will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.
Should you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact us.
Sincerely, Ellis W. M rs off, Director Division of Reactor Projects
Enclosures:
- 1. List of Attendees
- 2. Licensee Slides cc w/encls:
H. W. Habermeyer, Jr.
Vice President Nuclear Services Department Carolina Power & Light Company P. 0. Box 1551 - Mail 0HS7 Raleigh, NC 27602 (cc w/encls cont'd -
See page 2) 9402080124 940120 PDR ADOCK 05000261 P
Carolina Power and Light Company 2
JAN 20 1994 (cc w/encls cont'd)
M. P. Pearson Plant Manager H. B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant P. 0. Box 790 Hartsville, SC 29550 W. Dorman, Acting Manager Regulatory Compliance H. B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant P. 0. Box 790 Hartsville, SC 29550 Max Batavia, Chief Bureau of Radiological Health Dept. of Health and Environmental Control 2600 Bull Street Columbia, SC 29201 Dayne H. Brown, Director Division of Radiation Protection N. C. Department of Environment, Commerce & Natural Resources P. 0. Box 27687 Raleigh, NC 27611-7687 H. Ray Starling Manager - Legal Department Carolina Power and Light Co.
P. 0. Box 1551 Raleigh, NC 27602 Karen E. Long Assistant Attorney General State of North Carolina P. 0. Box 629 Raleigh, NC 27602 Robert P. Gruber Executive Director Public Staff - NCUC P. 0. Box 29520 Raleigh, NC 27626-0520 Public Service Commission State of South Carolina P. 0. Box 11649 Columbia, SC 29211 bcc w/encls:
(See page 3)
JAN 2 0 194 Carolina Power and Light Company 3
bcc w/encls:
H. Christensen, RH B. Mozafari, NRR Document Control Desk NRC Resident Inspector U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Route 5, Box 413 Hartsville, SC 29550 RII:D RII:DQ RII:DRP RII:P JStaret :tj HChn'stensen DVrel 1iJJ son 01/0/94 01/ 14V94 01/11/94 0 /N4
ZNIAL1 Carolina Power and La1ht Many:
. Drser, ELxecutive Vice President C. Dietz. Vice President, Robinsan N. Peafton, Plant Central Manager, Robinson M. Robinson, Vice President, Harris
- 6. Attarian, Chief Electrical Engineer CAMbell, VicePresident, NucleareEngineering Departat R. Barnett, Manager, Pr8J~t Managemmnt
- 0.
Iters, Shift Supervisor, Rob aon J.
uibert, Consultant P. Muster, Manager, ngineering and Technical Support, Robinson A. Carleyi Manager, Cosmnications, Robinson R. Stanc, Manager, Nuclear Business Planning and Analysis D. Davis, Consultant R. Rogan, Manager, Licensing Nuclear Reulatory Comission:
L. A. Reyes, D uty Regional Administrator, Region II (RUI)
J. A. Johnson, puty Director, Division of Reactor ProjeGI;a CORP), R11 A: F.' Gibson, Director;-Oivision of Reactor safety (MR), KIT J1.
P. Jaudon, Deputy Director, ORS, KIT T. A. Peebles, Chief, Operations Branch, ORS, RI
- 5. S. Baica, Acting 2irector, Project Directorate TI-1, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRA)
D. M. Verelli, Chief, Reactor Projects Branch 1, DRP, RIH Il.
- 0. Christensen, Chief, Reactor Projects Section IA, ORP, RI!
- 0. L. Mozafarf, Project Manager, URR W.. Orders, Senior Resident Inspector - Robinson, DRP. RII P. J. Kang, Electrical Enqineer, NR J. L. Starefos, Project Engineer, DRP, RI1 Public Visitors S. Hobbs, S5 Association T. Lim, North Carolina State Utilities Comission oTAL P.01
ENCLOSURE 2 g p&L Status Of Readiness C.arolina Power & Light To Restart Robinson Nuclear Plant January 10, 1994
status Ut KeatineSS To Kestart Agenda Introduction W. S. Orser Current Schedule For C. R. Dietz Completion And Status Of Required Actions Restart Program Effectiveness M. P. Pearson P. D. Musser Other Items Of Regulatory C. R. Dietz Interest M. P. Pearson Development Of Post Restart C. R. Dietz Improvement Plan Conclusions And Preparations W. S. Orser For Next Management Meeting CP&L Carolina Power & Light
0 ft 0
0
~0 0
Current Schedule For Completion And Status Of Required Action CP&L Carolina Power & Light
Restart Readiness Action Items -- Summary Status 1/8/94 Item Title Total Number Remaining Comments To Complete Number To Complete 01 Emergency Diesel Generator Operability 1
1
-80% complete. Forecast Operable status by 1114/94.
02 uclear Instrumentation - Short Term 16 4
75% complete. Forecast completion by 1/14194.
03 Fuel and Core Loading Problems - Short Term 11 0
100% of the Fuel and Core Loading action items are complete.
04 System Readiness Self Assessment 39 38 Forecast completion by 1/13/94.
05 Organtrational Readines Self Assessment 6
2 Forecast completion by 1/11/94.
06 Opeadons Shift Readiess Self Assessment 5
5 Training has been conducted. Forecast completion by 1113/94.
07 Completion of Startup Required Actions
-500
-150 resulting from Self Assessments #4. #5, & #6 08 Colective Evkuation System Readiess 1
1 Forecast completion by 1/15/94.
09 Colective Evaluation Operational Readiness 1
1 Forecast completion by 1115/94.
10 Completion of Startup Required Actions To Be resulting from Colective Evaluations #8 & #9 Determined 11 Completion of Training of Startup Organization 6
6 and Operating Crews on Startup and Power Ascension Plan 12 Completion of Assessment Hokoint 1 1
1 Forecast completion by 1/17/94 13 Complete Requirements of CAL 2-93-08 5
3 50% Complete. Remainder pending Requirement #2 and
- 3 completion.
14 Other 10 6
CP&L Carolina Power & Light
Readiness To Restart Plan Current Schedule Advise NRC System Readiness Reviews/
o nett Of Intent to System Engineer Affirmations1/5Hau 12/1 1eatup 12/101/13System Readiness Collective Evaluationmu Joint SRO/System Engineer Walkdowns 12/13 Complete
12/15 Affinnations NAD Assessment Of Restart Readiness Carolina Power & ight 12/13 1/16
Startup & Power Ascension Schedule 1/17 1/18 1/20 1/24 1/27 1/30...........
2/13 HP #6 HP #5 Release Approval To Exceed From Plan 70% Power HP #4 Approval To Exceed 30%0 Power*
Full Power HP #3 Approval To Go critical**Poe>7%
HP #1 HP #2 Approval For Approval To Exceed Heatup*
350 Degrees Power >30%
Heatup Criticality
- Inform NRC
- ANRC Concurrence Also Required CP&L Carolina Power & 1ight
Restart Program Effectiveness CP&L Carolina Power & Light
System Readiness Goals Increased Standards For Material Condition Increased Ownership By Operations For Material Condition Reduced Operator Distraction Due To Workarounds Activities Detailed Review Of System Material Condition By System Engineers Joint SRO/System Engineer Walkdowns Conducted Results Approximately 500 Items Identified As Startup Required Progress In Attaining Pre-Established Restart Target Levels For Maintenance Backlog Progress In Resolving Material Condition Problems Experienced During Startup From RFO-15 CP&L Carolina Power & Light
System Readiness Status as of 1/8/93 100%
1000 Complete PLP-027 PLP-027 Tech. Sup.
Review M anagement Review Scheduled Approx. 80%
1 of 39 1/15/94 H0 HL0 PLP-059 H Recommendation Management Feedback to Sys. Engineer ColStem l
a M a I
H of System Plant Manager Review Sys. Engineer AlTirmation Readiness for Restart 1000/
PLP-059/027 Joint SRO/
System Eng.
Walkdown CP&L PLP-027 - System Startup Readiness Delemination Carolina Power & Lgit PLP-059 - Plan for Resart Readiness and Startup and Power Ascension
Results Of Self-Assessment Of System Readiness (PLP-027/PLP-059 Reviews And Walkdowns)
Approximately 500 Work Items Identified As Startup Required Work Requests:
287 Items Related To Equipment And System Maintenance 184 Items Related To Supports, Covers, Insulation, And Clean-up 35 Items Related To Testing &
Troubleshooting Approximately 50% Of These Work Items Were Not Previously Identified And Reflect An Increased Sensitivity To Higher Standards For Material Condition Approximately 50% Of These Work Items, While Previously Identified, Were Not Previously Considered As Startup Required Actions - Reflecting An Increased Sensitivity To Reducing Operational Distractions/Workarounds And To Improving System Reliability Approximately 40% Of These Work Items Are Related To BOP Equipment CP&L Carolina Power & Light
RNP Open Item Status Material Condition Completed Restart 11/16/93 Since Current Target Status 11/16/93 Status Level Priority Systems Important To 1-4 28 40 27 20 Safety/Reliability On-Line Corrective Maintenance Total 94 181 113 100 Total-All Systems On-Line Corrective 66 141 86
<75 Maintenance Priority 1-4 Temporary Modifications 20 3
17 10 Operator Workarounds 14 1
13 10 Blue Dots (Control Room Instruments, Etc) 61 124 38 25 Caution Tags 38 N/A 89 25 CP&L Carolina Power & Light
Material Condition Status Of Resolution Of Material Condition Problems Experienced During Initial Startup From RFO 15 Feedwater Flow Control/Steam Generator Level Control Work To Reduce Operator Distractions Troubleshooting Procedural Enhancements Instrument Transmitter Venting Turbine Control Valve Activities Procedural Enhancements Improving Accuracy Of Indications Other Issues (Re: NI Team - Event Timeline)
All Actual Or Apparent Material Condition Issues Have Been Addressed And Are Complete With The Exception Of Required Post Maintenance Testing C P&L Carolina Power & Light
Organizational Readiness Goals Assure Adequate Support For Restart And Next Cycle Operations Higher Standards For Identification Of Problems Activities Organization Readiness Reviews Conducted Environmental & Radiation Control Completed (1 Session)
Training Completed (3 Sessions)
Emergency Preparedness Completed (2 Sessions)
Technical Support Projected Jan 11, 1993 - (5 Sessions)
Operations Projected Jan 11, 1993 - (2 Sessions)
Maintenance Completed (1 Session)
Results Increased Level Of ACR Activity Demonstrates Higher Standards Training Developed An Integrated Improvement Plan Reinforced Emphasis On Individual Accountability CP&L Carolina Power & Light
ACRs Generated in 1993 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct. Nov Dec C Level I Level 1IE Level III Carolina Power& Light
Operational Readiness Goals Higher Standards For The Conduct Of Operations Ownership Of Plant Material Condition And Readiness To Operate Ownership Of Operator Training Activities Reviews Of Readiness By All Five Operating Shifts In Process Higher Expectations Set By Management (Reinforcement By Startup Duty Managers)
SRO Walkdowns Conducted With System Engineers Special Startup Training Completed Successfully Independent Evaluation By Operational Readiness Review Team Results CP&L Carolina Power & Light
Operational Readiness Review Team (BNP Operations Assist Visit)
Areas Requiring Improvement/Increased Attention:
Conduct Of Operations Communication and Reinforcement Of Management Expectations Program Of Continuing Management Oversight Ownership By Operations Of Training Program Adequacy Restart/Recovery Plans Effective Communications On PLP-59 Resources/Expectations/Training For The Development And Implementation Of The Startup And Power Ascension Plan Control Room Access Controls For Startup And Power Ascension CP&L Carolina Power & Light
Operational Readiness Review Team (BNP Operations Assist Visit)
Areas Requiring Improvement/Increased Attention:
(Con't)
Staffing Assignment Of Interim/Permanent Managers Long-term Staffing Needs/Training Pipeline Work Control Center Staffing For Startup And Power Ascension Management of Backlogs Reduction Of Backlog Of Procedure Problem Concerns Improvements To Corrective Action Program Implementation CP&L Carolina Power & Light
Restart Program Effectiveness NAD Assessment CP&L Carolina Power & Light
NAD Assessment Program Phased Assessment Process Phase I In Progress Will Continue Until Pre-2000 F PNSC Interim Results Frequent Debriefs To Vice President - RNP Phase I Monitor Plant Startup From 200 0F To 100%
Power Daily Debrief Vice President - RNP CP&L Carolina Power & Light
NAD Assessment Results Interim Status Summary January 4, 1994
.Ten Items Requiring Increased Emphasis By Plant January 9, 1994 Five Of Ten Items - Closed Three Of Ten Items - Closure Pending Further Review Of Plant Response Two Remaining Items - Included By Plant As Startup Required Items Carolina Power & Light
NAD Assessment Results Restart Readiness Process Effective Lower Threshold For Problem Identification Higher Performance Standards Problems Getting To The Table Problems Being Addressed CrPwe L
Carolina Power & Light
Other Items Of Regulatory Interest CP&L Carolina Power & Light
Other Items Of Regulatory Interest Current Robinson Plant Organization Startup Organization Technical Specification Surveillance Review Program CP&L Carolina Power & Light
Robinson Plant Organization C. R. Dietz VP -RNP Regulatory Support Scotty Hinnant Project Ibaining Site Director Affairs Servkces (Interim)
Manatenent Marc Pearson Tehia E&RC Maintenance Plant General Manager Support Rick Moore CP&L oA.....
Carolina Power & Light
Startup Organization Unit 2 Plant Manager Operations Power Ascension Manager Test Manager O n.
Shit.-.24 H ou rs............................
I_____
- On Shift -24 Hours+.
Shift Supervisor
J-----------...--
Startup Duty Manager f.......
Shift Technical Senior Shift Test Coordinator Advisor Reactor Operator (As Needed)
C P& L Shift Operators Pernanent Organization Startup Organization Carolina Power & Light
Technical Specification Surveillance Review Resolution Of Issues In ENERCON Report In Progress Significant Comments Reviewed Review Of Existing Program In Progress CP&L Carolina Power & Light
Development Of Post Restart Improvement Plan CP&L Carolina Power & Light
Development Of Post Restart Improvement Plan Objective: Continue The Momentum And Progress In Improvements At H. B. Robinson Plant Higher Management Expectations Higher Standards For Conduct Of Nuclear Operations Continuous Improvement Of All Supporting Organizations To Those Higher Standards Approach: Continue Activities To Strengthen Operations And Expand The Self-Assessment Program To The Other Organizations Activities:
Develop A Formal Post Startup Improvement Plan Capture The Longer Term Actions From The Restart Self-Assessments Continue And Expand Self-Assessments Implement A Program Of Monthly Observation And Management Expectations Setting With Shift Operations CP&L Carolina Power & Light
Development Of Post Restart Improvement Plan Activities (Con't)
Focus On Identified Weaknesses Procedures And Procedural Adherence Problem Identification And Resolution Improve Technical Skills Communications Program (To Identify Why Improvement And Change Is Needed)
CP&L Carolina Power & Light
Backup Slides CP&L Carolina Power & Light
Startup Required Items (Criteria)
In General, The Following Criteria Define A Startup Required Action:
- 1. Actions Which Are Required To Ensure Operability Required By Plant Technical Specifications
- 2.
Items Which Are Required To Ensure Safe And Reliable Startup, Power Ascension, And Resumption Of Full Power Operations
- 3.
Items Which Are Required To Ensure Safety And Reliable Operations Through The Next Operating Cycle
- 4.
Items Which Are Required To Ensure Personnel Safety
- 5. Items Which Are Required To Minimize Temporary Conditions And To Reduce Distractions To Operators C P& L Camolia Po r & L t
(Backup Slide)
Nuclear Instrumentation Team Short Term Items Incorporate The PLP-037 Case I and Case II Important Evolutions Into The Outage Plan Developed For The Forced Outage.
Status: Complete Develop A Format For The Outage Shift Turnover Meetings That Will Ensure That Each Shift's Tasks Which Involve A PLP-037 Case Determination Are Identified And The MDM Noted.
Status: Complete Ensure That Any Document, Calculation Or Work Activity Requiring A Review Is Reviewed By Another Individual Knowledgeable In The Subject Matter.
Status: Open Forecast: January 13, 1994 CP&L Carolina Power & Light (Backup Item 2)
Nuclear Instrumentation Team Short Term Items Assess The Necessary Reactor Engineering Involvement In The Current Forced Outage And Power Ascension Activities And Take Appropriate Actions To Ensure Sufficient Reactor Engineering Staff Is Available.
Status: Complete Operations Management To Ensure That Operations Personnel Do Not Develop Tunnel Vision And Only Concentrate On Reactivity Management. Operations Management Should Revisit The March 24, 1993, Letter From Mr. Kenneth Strahm Of INPO Addressed To Mr. R.
A. Watson. Mr. Strahm's Letter Points Out The Need To Maintain Control Of Key Primary Plant Parameters.
Status: Complete
- CP&L CnP&L (Backup Item 2)
Carolina Power & Light
Nuclear Instrumentation Team Short Term Items Operations Management Should Review With Operators The Basic Concepts Of Procedural Compliance When Faced With Challenging Situations. Operator Should Not Be So Focused On An Activity That A Tech. Spec. Or Administrative Requirement Is Violated/ Exceeded. More Specifically, The Belief Of Some Operators Personnel That It Is Okay to Violate Tech. Spec. Ramp Rate Limit In Order To Get The Feedwater System In Automatic And Stable Should Be Addressed.
Status: Complete Ensure That Plant Personnel Clearly Understand The Management Chain Of Command, And The Responsibilities Of The Various Management Personnel That They Interface With.
Forecast:
January 12, 1994 CP&L Carolina Power & Light (Backup Item 2)
Nuclear Instrumentation Team Short Term Items A)
Revise FMP-002 To:
- 1)
Ensure The Proper Methodology Is Used For Each Core Or Require Fuel Vendor To Supply Excore Instrumentation Adjustment Factors.
- 2)
Include A Means Of Self-Checking To Ensure Reasonableness Of Calculated Results Such As:
Compare To Previous Cycle Results.
Compare Calculated BOC Currents To Previous BOC and EOC Currents And Verify Change In Expected Direction.
Require Fuels Verification Of Results.
Compare To Expected Results From Fuels Or Fuel Vendor.
B)
Use The Revised FMP-002 To Calculate The Excore Instrumentation Factors.
C)
Ensure The Power Range And Instrumentation Range NIs Are Adjusted As Needed.
Status: Complete CP&L Carolina Power & Light (Backup Item 2)
Nuclear Instrumentation Team Short Term Items Conduct Simulator And/Or Classroom Training For Operating Crews, Including STA And Reactor Engineers Who Are Assigned To The Shifts Performing The Startup.
Operations And Training Management Shall Determine The Crew Training Needs, And Design The Training To Meet Those Needs. The Following Specific Topics Are Recommended:
a)
The November 14, 1993, HBR Mismatch Between Actual And Indicated Reactor Power.
b)
Fuel Cycle 16 Core Changes And How The Core, Reactivity Control And NIs May React Differently From Previous Cycles.
c)
Stress The Importance Of Monitoring Diverse Indications Of Reactor Power, Particularly For A New Core Startup Prior To The First Calorimetric And Adjustment Of The NIs.
d)
Appropriate Industry Events That Have Occurred During Plant Startup Should Be Covered, Such As Those Described In SOER 90-003.
e)
Simulator Scenarios Should Include Realistic Equipment Malfunctions And NIS Errors.
Status: Complete CP&L Carolina Power & Light (Backup Item 2)
Nuclear Instrumentation Team Short Term Items Ensure That OST-001 And OST-006 Are Revised To Include The New Intermediate Range Setpoints Following The Completion Of The Setpoint Adjustments By The I&C Technicians.
Status: Complete Verify Valve Line-Ups Required For Startup.
Status: Eighty Percent Complete Forecast: January 11, 1994 CP&L Carolina Power & Light (Backup Item 2)
INuclear instrumentation T[eam Short Term Items Provide Instructions In The Body Of Procedure GP-005, Power Operation, To:
a)
Use Independent Indications Of Reactor Power To Validate The Ms. Ensure the Instructions Assign Responsibility For Comparing The NIs With The Independent Indications.
b)
Stop Power Escalation When Any Of The Independent Power Indication Parameters Indicate That The Reactor Power Has Reached 20%, Or If there Is A Significant Discrepancy Between The Reactor Power Indicators When Below 20% Power.
c)
At 20% Reactor Power, Verify That The Indications Of Reactor Power Are Within 5% Of Each Other.
d)
If The Power Rate Restrictions Apply:
- 1)
Increase Power To Less Than Or Equal To 30% at 3% Per Hour, Based On The Highest Indication Of Reactor Power.
- 2)
Perform A Calorimetric And Adjust The NIs, If Applicable, Prior To Increasing Power Above 30%.
e)
Stop Power Escalation When The Independent Power Indication Parameters Show A Deviation Of Reactor Power Greater Than 5% When the Reactor Is Above 20% Power Status: Complete CP&L Carolina Power & Light (Backup Item 2)
Nuclear Instrumentation Team Short Term Items Identify GP-003 And GP-005 As PLP-037 Case I Evolutions And:
a)
Specify That The MDM Should Review The Fundamental Priorities On Nuclear Safety When Briefing The Operating Staff. This Review Should Include A Discussion About How The Fundamental Nuclear Safety Parameters Can Be Monitored, And How Specific Action Levels Can Be Determined.
b)
Provide Guidance On How And When The MDM Is Expected To Intervene, While Maintaining A Clear Chain Of Command Within The Operating Staff.
Status: Complete Provide A Label For The RCS Delta-T Recorder That Will Indicate Both Degrees F and % Power.
Status: Complete CP&L Carolina Power & Light (Backup Item 2)
Nuclear Instrumentation Team Short Term Items Ensure Feedwater Flow Indication Problems Are Resolved.
Status:
Special Venting Process Will Be Done During Startup Ensure The Operators Knowledge Of The Operation Of The Voltage Regulator.
Status: Complete CP&L Carolina Power & Light (Backup Iterm 2)
Nuclear Fuel Team Short Term Items CP&L Should Provide Effective Foreign Material Exclusion Indoctrination For Personnel Involved In Fuel Handling And Inspection.
Status: Complete NFS Should Ensure That The Fuel Assemblies Used For Cycle 16 Meet Design Requirements.
Status: Complete NFS Should Clearly State That Fuel Assemblies, Safety Analyses And Other Relevant Analyses And Documentation Meet Requirements.
Status: Complete Plant Management Should Conduct A Questioning Review Of Formal Statements From The Vendor, NFS And Reactor Engineering That Fuel Design, Manufacturing, Safety Analyses, Receiving, Handling, Inspections, And Core Placement Meet Requirements.
Status: Complete CP&L Carolina Power & Light (BackuD Item 3)
Nuclear Fuel Team Short Term Items All Significant Anomalies In The 30% Flux Maps Should Be Resolved To Plant Management's Satisfaction.
Status: Complete CP&L Should Review Fuel Inspection Procedures And Equipment To Ensure The Work Will Accomplish Objectives Without Unwanted Consequences.
Status: Complete Siemens Should Review Tools Used For Fuel Inspection Activities To Ensure They Conform To Design Philosophy.
Status:
Complete Siemens Should Inspect The Tools Before Use To Ensure They Comply With Design.
Status: Complete CP& L
Nuclear Fuel Team Short Term Items Line Management Should Direct And Ensure Support For All Activities Involving Fuel.
Status: Complete The Fuel Inspection Activities Should Include Prejob Briefs By Line Management.
Status:
Complete Siemens Should Ensure That Fuel Inspection Activities Are Adequately Staffed And Managed With Provisions For Contingencies Included.
Status:
Complete CP&L Carolina Power & Light (Backup Item 3)
Collective Evaluations - (PLP-059)
Collective Evaluation Of System Readiness An Integrated Management Review Of the Acceptability Of The Material Condition Of RNP For Startup And Power Operations Participants Include The Plant Manager (Chair),
And The Managers Of Technical Support, Operations, Maintenance, And Regulatory Affairs Includes A Review Of Status With Respect To Pre established Restart Target Levels CP&
L Carolina Power & Light (Backup Item 8)
Collective Evaluations - (PLP-059)
Collective Evaluation Of Operations Readiness An Integrated Management Review Of The State Of Readiness Of The RNP Operating Crews To Support RNP Startup And Power Operations Participants Include The Plant Manager (Chair),
the Managers of Operations, Training and Regulatory Affairs, And The Power Ascension Test Manager Includes Inputs From Startup Duty Managers And Management Designated Monitors CP&
L Carolina Power & Ligbt (Backup Itemn 9)
Startup And Power Ascension Plan Goals Effective Management Oversight And Control Safe, Well-Controlled, And Deliberate Approach Plan Features Augmented Startup Organization Startup And Power Ascension Test Schedule Formal Assessment Hold Points (6)
Specific Performance Objectives CP&L Carolina Power & Ligbt (Backup Item 11)
Startup And Power Ascension Plan Status Plan Approved (PLP-59, Section 2.0)
Personnel Identified And Assigned Schedule Approved (Reflects A Comprehensive Review Of Post-Modification And Post Maintenance Testing Requirements)
Training Of Personnel On The Plan And Schedule To Be Completed By Jan 13 (Restart Requirement
- 11)
CP&
L Carolina Power & Light (Backup Item 11)
Confirmatory Action Letter Items
- 1. Conducted A Detailed Root Cause Analysis
- 2.
Met With NRC Prior To Completing Core Configuration Alterations
- 3.
Determined Cause Of NI Anomalies - Corrective Actions Complete Before Startup
- 4.
Evaluated Operator Performance And Procedures Corrective Actions And Training Complete Before Startup
- 5. Met With NRC December 20, 1993 - Will Obtain Concurrence Prior To Criticality CP&L Carolina Power & Light (Backup Item 13)
NSRC Action Items Action Items From Nuclear Safety Review Committee Prior To 2000 Restart
- 1. Review Last Two Plant Trips - See If Any Automatic Actions Did Not Take Place
- 2.
Check if The System Engineer Is Checking The Status Of the PMs On Their Systems
- 3.
See If Existing JCOs Were Reviewed And Approved By Same Person
- 4.
See What Controls Are In Place To Assure That A Restart Action Item, i.e., WR/JO, Training, Revise Procedure XYZ, That Is Put On The "List" Does Not Get Inadvertently Taken Off
- 5. Assure Standards Are Set And Understood Regarding Command And Control In The Control Room And When SS Can Call "Stop Work"
- 6.
Review NSRC and NSOC Minutes To See If All Action Items Were Resolved
- 7.
Ensure All Duties And Responsibilities Of The STA Are Defined Carolina Power & Lighn (Backup Item 14)
Additional Management/NAD Items Technical Specification Surveillance Review SOER 90-3, "Nuclear Instrument Miscalibration" Recommendation Review FMEP-002, "NIS Post Refueling Adjustment Determination" (Information On Changes To Operators)
CP&L Carolina Power & Light (Backup Item 14)
ACR Trend Sensitivity To What Constitutes An Adverse Condition Has Increased Sensitivity To Level Classification Has Increased Indicator Of Management's Acceptance Of ACRs CP&L Carolina Power & Light (Backup - ACR)
NAD Assessment Results January 4, 1994, Interim Status Summary Areas Requiring Increased Emphasis:
System Readiness Management Expectations Power Ascension Test Program Plans To Capture And Track Action Items Operational Readiness Operator Training Operations Plant Status Controls Work Planning And Control Emergency Diesel Generators Nuclear Instrumentation CP&L Carohn Power & Light (Backup - NAD)