ML14099A213
| ML14099A213 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Summer  |
| Issue date: | 04/04/2014 |
| From: | Lippard G South Carolina Electric & Gas Co |
| To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| Download: ML14099A213 (45) | |
Text
George A. Lippard General Manager, Nuclear Plant Operations 803.345.4810 April 4, 2014 A SCANA COMPANY Document Control Desk U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555
Dear Sir/Madam:
Subject:
VIRGIL C. SUMMER NUCLEAR STATION UNIT 1 DOCKET NO. 50-395 OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-12 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT Enclosed is the South Carolina Electric & Gas Company Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report as required by Regulatory Guide 4.8 and Section 6.9.1.6 of the Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station Technical Specifications.
If there are any questions, please contact Ms. Susan B. Reese at (803) 345-4591.
Very truly yours, Georý(e A. Lippard SBR/GAL/jg Enclosure c:
K. B. Marsh (w/o enclosure)
S. A. Byrne J. B. Archie N. S. Carns J. H. Hamilton (w/o enclosure)
J. W. Williams (w/o enclosure)
W. M. Cherry (w/o enclosure)
V. M. McCree S. A. Williams NRC Resident Inspector M. Coleman M. E. Jordan K. M. Sutton C. D. Stewart S. J. Threatt NSRC RTS (LTD 312)
File (818.02-2, RR 8300)
PRSF (RC-14-0062)
Virgil C. Summer Station. Post Office Box 88 -Jenkinsville, SC.29065
- F (803) 941-9776
A SCANA COMPANY ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT VIRGIL C. SUMMER NUCLEAR STATION FOR THE OPERATING PERIOD JANUARY 1, 2013 - DECEMBER 31, 2013 April 2014 Prepared by:
Reviewed by:
Brett Williams Health Physics Specialist H hPyichael Jordan Hjfth P~hysics Supervisor Approved by:*l**
Moses Coleman Manager Health Physics & Safety Services
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
This Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report describes the V.C. Summer Environmental Monitoring Program and the program results for the calendar year 2013.
Included are the identification of sample locations, descriptions of environmental sampling and type of analysis. Comparisons of present environmental radioactivity levels and pre-operational environmental data, land use census comparisons of doses calculated from environmental measurements, and a summary of environmental radiological sampling results. Quality assurance practices, sampling deviations and unavailable samples are also discussed.
Sampling activities were conducted as prescribed by the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM) for V.C. Summer Nuclear Station (VCSNS) and applicable Health Physics Procedures. Required analyses were performed and detection limits met for required samples with exceptions noted. Samples were collected comprising one thousand two hundred sixty four analyses (1,264) performed to compile the data for the 2013 Environmental Report. Supplemental samples comprising two hundred fifty five (255) analyses were performed on some media for additional information. Based on the results from the annual land use census, the current number of sampling sites for V.C. Summer Nuclear Station is sufficient.
Concentrations observed in the environment in 2013 from V.C. Summer related radionuclide concentrations were within the range of concentrations observed in the past. It is therefore concluded that VCSNS operations have no significant radiological impact on the health and safety of the public or the environment.
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION 1
DESCRIPTION OF THE RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM 2
LAND USE CENSUS 4
MONITORING RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 4
CONCLUSION 7
ii
LIST OF TABLES TABLE PAGE 1
Monitoring Methods for Critical Radiation Exposure 2
Pathways 2
2013 Fission and Activated Corrosion Product Activity in 6
Sediment 3
Required Sampling Site Locations 8
4 Results of the 2013 Land Use Census Verification 11 5
Critical Receptor Evaluation for 2013 12 6
Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program 13 Specifications 7
Supplemental Radiological Environmental Monitoring 18 8
Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Summary 22 for 2013 9
Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program 28 Preoperational (Baseline) Summary 10 Results of 2013 Environmental Intercomparison Program 33 with Independent Lab, Eckert & Ziegler Analytics, Inc.
11 2013 Environmental Sampling Program Exceptions 35 iii
LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE PAGE 1-1 Control Site Locations (50 mile radius around the 36 Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station) 1-2 Radiological Monitoring Program Local Indicator Sample 37 Sites (5 mile radius around Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station) 1-3 Radiological Monitoring Program Local Indicator Sample 38 Sites (1 mile radius around Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station) 1-4 Radiological Monitoring Program Security Area Ground 39 Water Sites.
1-5 Radiological Monitoring Program Protected Area Ground 40 Water Sites.
iv
INTRODUCTION Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station (VCSNS) utilizes a pressurized water reactor rated at 2900 MWt (990 MWe gross). The station is located adjacent to the Monticello Reservoir near Jenkinsville, South Carolina and approximately 26 miles northwest of Columbia. VCSNS achieved initial criticality on October 22, 1982, reached 50% power December 12, 1982 and 100% power June 10, 1983 following steam generator feedwater modifications. Steam generators were replaced in the fall of 1994. During the ninth refuel the plant was uprated to 2900 MWt (990 MWe gross). VCSNS is currently operating in the 2 1st fuel cycle.
VCSNS is operating in conjunction with the adjacent Fairfield Pump Storage Facility (FPSF) which consists of eight reversible pump-turbine units of 60 MWe capacity each.
During periods of off-peak power demand, base load generating capacity is used to pump water from Parr Reservoir to Monticello Reservoir. Monticello Reservoir has a surface area of approximately 6800 acres and lies about 150 feet above Parr Reservoir whose full pool area is approximately 4400 acres. The pump-turbine units operate in the generating mode to meet peak system loads while Monticello Reservoir also provides condenser cooling water for VCSNS. Cooling water intake and discharge structures are separated by a jetty to ensure adequate circulation within the reservoir.
VCSNS is located in Fairfield County which, along with Newberry County, makes up the principle area within a 10 mile radius of the plant. This area is mainly forest with only about 30% devoted to small farming activities principally producing small grains, feed crops and beef cattle. Significant portions of Lexington and Richland Counties are encompassed within the 20 mile radius of the plant and exhibit similar agricultural activities. Columbia, the state capital, is the only large city within the 50 mile radius of the plant. Small agricultural concerns are predominant, but make up less than 50% of the land area. The main industrial activity is concentrated around Columbia and is generally greater than 20 miles from the VCSNS.
Liquid effluents from VCSNS are released into the Monticello/Parr Reservoirs at two discharge points: the Circulating Water Discharge Canal (CWDC) and the FPSF Penstocks. Non-nuclear drains are released to the CWDC. Effluent from the liquid waste processing system and processed steam generator blowdown are released through the penstocks. Radioactive gaseous effluents from VCSNS are released from two points: the Main Plant Vent and the Reactor Building Purge Exhaust, all considered ground level releases.
Radioactive liquid and gaseous releases from the facility and their potential influence on the surrounding biota and man are the primary concern of the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program at VCSNS. This report summarizes the results of the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program conducted during 2013. Data trends, control/indicator and preoperational/operational data inter-comparisons, and other data interpretations are presented.
1
DESCRIPTION OF THE RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program is carried out in its entirety by South Carolina Electric and Gas Company. The program has been designed to meet the following general commitments:
- 1.
To analyze selected samples in important anticipated pathways for the qualification and quantification of radionuclides released to the environment surrounding VCSNS.
- 2.
To establish correlations between levels of environmental radioactivity and radioactive effluents from VCSNS operation.
The program utilizes the concepts of control/indicator and preoperational
/operational inter-comparisons in order to establish the adequacy of radioactivity source control and to realistically verify the assessment of environmental radioactivity levels and subsequent radiation dose to man.
Sample media and analysis sensitivity requirements have been established to ensure that the maximum dose pathways are monitored and sensitivities represent a small fraction of annual release limits. Effluent dispersion characteristics, demography, hydrology and land use have been considered in selection of environmental sampling locations. These criteria were used to establish both the preoperational and operational phases of the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program. Elements of the program monitor the impact of gaseous and liquid effluents released from VCSNS.
Specific methods used in monitoring the pathways of these effluents which may lead to radiation exposure of the public, based on existing demography, are summarized below in Table 1. Requirements of the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program are specified in the VCSNS Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM). Elements of the program monitor the impact of gaseous and liquid effluents released from VCSNS.
Table 1 - Monitoring Methods for Critical Radiation Exposure Pathways Effluent Release Type Exposure Pathway Monitoring Media Gaseous Immersion Dose and other Thermoluminescent Dosimetry (TLD),
External Dose Area Monitoring, Air Sampling, Vegetation (Ingestion)
Vegetation and Food Crop Sampling, Milk (Ingestion)
Milk Sampling, Grass (Forage)
Sampling Liquid Fish (Ingestion)
Fish Sampling, Water & Shoreline Surface Water Sampling, Ground Exposure (Ingestion and Water Sampling, Shoreline and Immersion)
Bottom Sediment Sampling, Drinking Water (Ingestion)
Drinking Water Sampling 2
Monitoring sites indicative of plant operating conditions are generally located within a 5 mile radius of the plant. Table 6 provides a list of ODCM required sampling locations.
Table 7 provides a list of supplemental sampling locations. Maps showing radiological environmental sampling locations within a radius of approximately 5 miles from VCSNS are presented as Figures 1-2 through 1-5. Figure 1-1 shows monitoring sites at distances greater than 10 miles from the plant. These locations indicate regional fluctuations in background radiation levels.
In addition to preoperational/operational data inter-comparisons, controVindicator data inter-comparisons are utilized. This is done to assess the probability that any observed abnormal measurement of radioactivity concentration is due to random or regional fluctuations rather than to a true increase in local environmental radioactivity concentration.
Environmental data is gathered through multiple types of sampling and measurements at specific locations. Several multiple sampling combinations are in use around the VCSNS. For example, all air sampling locations serve as environmental dosimetry monitoring locations. At these locations, airborne plant effluents are monitored for gamma immersion dose (noble gases), in addition to air contaminants. Monitoring locations Site 6 (1.0 mi. ESE) and Site 7 (1.0 mi. E) have broadleaf vegetation gardens for monitoring gaseous effluent deposition (ingestion pathway) in the two sectors having the highest deposition coefficients (D/Q) with real potential for exposure. Monitoring location Site 18 (16.5 mi. S) serves as a control location for direct radiation and Site 40 (11.9 mi.
SSE) serves as a control location for garden monitoring.
Liquid effluents are monitored using three different monitoring media (fish, bottom sediment and surface water) at the two most probable affected bodies of water around the plant: Site 21, Parr Reservoir (2.7 mi. SSW) and Site 23, Monticello Reservoir (0.5 mi.
ESE). The control location for liquid effluent comparisons is at Site 22, Neal Shoals (26.0 mi. NNW) on the Broad River.
Quality of analytical measurements is demonstrated by participation in a laboratory inter-comparison program. Results of the inter-comparison program with an outside vendor and VCSNS Count Room were satisfactory in 2013. The results of each of these quality control checks of the Radiological Environmental Monitoring program verify the technical credibility of analytical data generated and reported by the program.
3
LAND USE CENSUS Annually a land use census is performed within a 5 mile radius of VCSNS to verify the adequacy of sample locations. In addition, the location of the maximum exposed individual (MEI) is identified. The results of the land use census performed in 2013 are included in Table 4. A verification of the maximum exposed individual location is presented in Table 5. Identification of the highest offsite dose locations was performed by calculating a hypothetical dose based on predicted VCSNS source term from the Operating License Environmental Report and 2013 meteorological data. Exposure pathways used in the analysis were those identified during the land use census.
The location and pathway presently used in the ODCM for offsite organ dose calculations (E 1.1 miles - residence/garden) was found to have a calculated dose of 2.98E+0 mrem/year. In addition, the ODCM required environmental gardens (ESE 1.0 and E 1.0 mile) were found to have a calculated dose of 2.48E+0 and 3.78E+0 mrem/year.
There were no milking animals or dairy activity found within 5 kilometers of VCSNS.
Therefore, changes to the ODCM gaseous effluent calculations or garden sample locations are not indicated.
MONITORING RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The results of the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program for 2013 are summarized in Table 8. For comparison, preoperational data are summarized in Table 9.
The Radiological Environmental Program attained a program compliance rate of approximately 99.2%. A listing of program exceptions and their respective causes are included in Table 11. Analysis of the impact of these omissions verified that program quality has not been affected.
Corbicula harvest for possible human consumption was observed in Lake Monticello in 2005. Since that time Corbicula analysis has been incorporated in the Supplemental Sampling Program. Samples were collected and analyzed for gamma emitting isotopes.
No measurable gamma emitting nuclides were detected above minimum detectable activity (MDA).
Gross beta activities measured in air particulate samples collected at indicator locations around VCSNS were consistent with preoperational levels and not statistically different from control locations. The highest site-specific mean activity (2.34E-2 pCi/m 3) was measured at indicator location Site 7 (Lab Garden 1.0 mi. E). The results indicate that the operation of VCSNS has not contributed to detectable increases of airborne gross beta activity in the environment.
Gamma spectroscopy measurements of composited air particulate samples and activated charcoal cartridges support the gross beta activity trend. Only natural background activities were detected. The highest MDA levels for 134Cs, 137Cs and 1311 were 1.78E-3, 7.47E-3 and 1.75E-2 pCi/m 3, respectively. The average maximum results support the gaseous effluent release data reported in the 2013 Annual Radiological Effluent Release Report for VCSNS. 99.4% of the required indicator/control air samples were collected.
4
Environmental dosimetry measurements did not differ significantly from preoperational measurements. Indicator and control dosimetry measurements also showed no appreciable differences. Comparison with other operational years shows no statistically significant difference. Monitoring location Site 47 (Fairfield Tailrace 1.0 mi. NW) was the indicator location showing the highest mean exposure rate of 1.17E+1 tR/hr. This is similar to the 2012 value of 1.16E+1 pR/hr and consistent with the highest mean exposure rate of 1.40 E+1 pR/hr measured during the preoperational period. 98.1% of the required TLDs were collected.
Gamma spectroscopy measurements of surface water samples did not indicate the presence of activated corrosion or fission products above the respective MDA for indicator sites. Tritium analysis did not indicate the presence of tritium above MDA. 100% of indicator/control surface water samples were collected.
Gamma spectroscopy measurements of the ODCM required ground water samples did not indicate the presence of activated corrosion or fission products above the respective MDAs. Tritium analysis did not indicate the presence of tritium above MDA.
100% of indicator/control ground water samples were collected.
Gamma spectroscopy measurements of drinking water samples collected from the Jenkinsville water supply and Site 17 (Columbia Water Works 25.0 mi. SE) did not indicate the presence of activated corrosion or fission product activity above the respective MDAs.
Tritium analysis did not indicate the presence of tritium above MDA. The highest indicator and control site-specific gross beta activity was measured at Site 39 (Lake Murray Water Treatment Facility 14.0 mi. SSE) at a level of 3.00E+0 pCi/I.
100% of indicator/control drinking water samples were collected.
There were no milk samples collected in 2013. Milk sampling is required to be performed at the three highest dose locations within 5 kilometers of the plant or at 5 to 8 kilometers of the plant, if doses are calculated to be greater than 1 mrem per year.
Presently there are no locations meeting this criteria for indicator dairies. The closest dairy is approximately 8 kilometers from the plant (see Table 4). Milk samples will be obtained from this dairy if gaseous releases from the plant exceed 5% of quarterly organ dose limits or radionuclides (attributed to the operation of VCSNS) are detected in broadleaf vegetation, grass or air samples at concentrations greater than required LLDs.
Gamma spectroscopy measurement of supplemental grass samples collected indicated 1 3 7 CS in 6 of 12 samples at Site 2 (transmission line 1.2 mi. SW) at concentrations ranging from 1.11E+1 to 8.01E+1 pCi/kg. Site 25 (Penstock Remediation Area, 0.9 mi. WNW) indicated 137Cs in 2 of 4 samples at concentrations of 1.97E+1 and 2.99E+1 pCi/kg. The maximum preoperational control activity was 3.40E+2 pCi/kg. 100%
of indicator/control supplemental grass samples were collected.
Gamma spectroscopy measurements of the broadleaf samples collected did not indicate the presence of activated corrosion or fission products above the respective MDAs. All of the required indicator/control broadleaf samples were collected.
5
Gamma spectroscopy measurements of all non-leafy (other vegetation) supplemental samples collected did not indicate the presence of activated corrosion or fission products above the respective MDA.
Gamma spectroscopy measurements of the fish samples collected indicated the presence of 137Cs in 1 of 2 samples taken at Site 21 (Parr Res. 2.7 mi. SSW) at a concentration of 1.75E+1 pCi/kg. All of the required indicator/control fish samples were collected.
Gamma spectroscopy measurements of sediment samples indicated the detection of 137Cs in 4 of 4 indicator samples. At Site 21 (Parr Res. 2.7 mi. SSW) at concentrations of 7.07E+1 and 3.49E+1 pCi/kg was detected. And at Site 23 (Lake Monticello Res. 1.5 mi. ENE) at concentrations of 4.09E+1 and 1.90E+1 pCi/kg was detected. 137 Cs was also detected in 2 of 2 control samples taken at Site 22 (Neal Shoals 26 mi. NNW) at concentrations of 8.96E+1 and 1.74E+1 pCi/kg.
All required indicator/control sediment samples were collected.
Table 2 - 2013 Fission and Activated Corrosion Product Activity in Sediment Corresponding Calculated Location Radionuclide Activity (pCi/kg)
Annual Dose Equivalent (mrem/yr)
Total Body Maximum Mean Maximum Mean Parr Reservoir 137Cs 7.07E+1 5.28E+1 5.94E-3 4.44E-3 Maximum Mean Maximum Mean Monticello Reservoir 137Cs 4.09E+1 3.00E+1 3.44E-3 2.52E-3 6
CONCLUSION As in previous years of VCSNS operation, the presence of fission product activity attributed to residual fallout from atmospheric weapons testing and the Chernobyl accident were detected in environmental media including sediment and grass.
No detectable fission or activation product activity attributed to VCSNS operations was observed in environmental media with the exception of:
1 3 7 CS in one fish sample at Site 21 (Parr Res. 2.7 mi. SSW).
137Cs in two sediment sample at Site 21 (Parr Reservoir 2.7 mi. SSW) and two sediment samples at Site 23 (Discharge Canal Monticello Reservoir.5 mi. ESE).
The dose calculated for the maximum exposed individual will not result in observable effect on the ecosystem or general public. The results of the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program, therefore, substantiate the continuing adequacy of source control at VCSNS and conformance of station operation to 10 CFR 50, Appendix I design objectives.
7
Table 3 - Required Sampling Site Locations Site Description Distance Direction 2 Sample Type(s) 3 No.
(Miles) 1 Borrow Pit 1.2 179.8 S DQ 2
Transmission Line 1.1 225.0 SW AP, RI, DQ 3
Firing Range 1.2 270.0 W DQ 4
Fairfield Hydro 1.2 289.5 WNW DQ 5
Transmission Line Entrance 0.9 144.0 SE DQ 6
Environmental Lab Garden 1.0 111.0 ESE AP,RI,GA,DQ,GW 7
Environmental Lab Garden 1.0 97.8 E AP,RI,DQ, GA 8
Monticello Res. S of Rd 224 1.5 62.0 ENE DQ 9
Ball Park 2.3 41.6 NE DQ 10 Meteorological Tower #2 2.5 25.5 NNE DQ 12 Old Hwy 99 4.2 349.4N DQ 13 North Dam 2.9 333.0 NNW DQ 14 Dairy (Shealy)4 6.5 277.0 W MK,GR 16 Dairy (Parr) 20.0 275.5 W MK,GR 16a TLD Location 28.0 278.6W DQ 17 Columbia Water Works 25.0 144.0 SE AP,RI,DQ,DW 18 Pine Island Club 16.5 165.0 S DQ 19 Residence/Little Saluda 21.0 224.0 SSW DQ 20 Residence/Whitmire 22.0 309.5 NW DQ 21 Parr Reservoir 2.7 199.5 SSW SW,FH,BS 22 Neal Shoals 26.0 343.1 NNW SW,FH,BS 23 Discharge Canal (Mont, Res.)
0.5 104.5 ESE SW,FH,BS 26 On Site Well (P2) 460 Ft 270.0 W GW 27 On Site Well (P5) 510 Ft 180.0 S GW 28 New Nuclear Deploymento 2.6 170.2 SSE DW 29 Trans. Line WSW of VCSNS 1.0 260.6 WSW DQ 30 Oak Tree North of Borrow Pitb 1.0 / 0.5 196.2 SSW DQ, AP, RI 31 McCrorey-Liston School 6.6 11.5 NNE DQ 32 Clark Bridge Road and Brooks Drive 4.6 24.0 NNE DQ 33 Rd 48 near Hwy 213 4.2 68.0 ENE DQ 34 Rd 419 North of Hwy 60 4.9 111.0 ESE DQ 35 Glenn's Bridge Road 4.6 132.0 SE DQ 36 Woods at Jenkinsville Post Office 3.1 151.0 SSE DQ 37 Residence 4.9 304.8 NW DQ 39 Lake Murray Water Treatment Facility 14.0 168.0 SSE DW 40 Emergency Operations Facility' 11.9 157.0 SSE GA, GR 8
Table 3 (cont) - Required Sampling Site Locations Site Description Distance Direction 2 Sample Type(s)3 No.
(Miles) 41 Below Catwalk at Trestle 3.8 182.0 S DQ 42 Broad River Rd (Peak Residence) 3.8 198.0 SSW DQ 43 Hwy 176 and Rd 435 5.2 236.0 SW DQ 44 Rd 28 at Cannon's Creek 2.8 256.6 WSW DQ 45 Rd 33 at Pomaria 5.8 253.2 WSW DO 46 Rd 28 at Heller's Creek 3.7 291.5 WNW DQ 47 Fairfield Tailrace 1.0 316.0 NW DQ 52 Monticello (Rd 11) 3.8 13.0 NNE DQ 53 Rd 359 3.0 46.5 NE DQ 54 Jenkinsville School 1.7 72.5 ENE DQ 55 St. Barnabas Church 2.8 91.5 E DQ 56 Old Jenkinsville Dinner 2.0 144.0 SE DQ 58 Residence 2.5 157.0 SSE DQ 59 New Nuclear Deployment5 2.6 170.2 SSE DO, GW 60 Rd 98 near Rd 28 3.5 274.6 W DQ 101 Remediation Well (B-2) 300 Ft NNW GW 102 Remediation Well (B-6) 400 Ft NE GW 103 Remediation Well (DW-13) 80 Ft NE GW 106 Remediation Well (DW-7) 250 Ft SE GW 108 Remediation Well (DW-19) 250 Ft W
GW 110 Remediation Well (B-36) 300 Ft NW GW 112 NPDES Well (GW-9) 0.36 331 SSE GW 113 NPDES Well (GW-12) 0.33 332 SSE GW 114 NPDES Well (GW-13A) 0.39 317 SE GW 9
Table 3 (cont) - Required Sampling Site Locations Footnotes
- 1.
Distance given is the distance between the site location and the VCSNS reactor containment building.
- 2.
Direction given in degrees from true north-south line through center of reactor containment building.
- 3.
Sample Types:
AP = Air Particulate GW = Ground Water GA = Garden RI = Air Radioiodine DW = Drinking Water FH = Fish DQ = Quarterly TLD MK = Milk BS = Bottom Sediment SW = Surface Water GR = Grass (Forage)
- 4.
Sites 14 and 16 are not presently in use. If conditions change, requiring a renewal of dairy sampling these sites will be reactivated.
- 5.
Site 28 for drinking water and Site 59 for quarterly TLD measurements are co-located at the location of the SCE&G New Nuclear Deployment.
- 6.
Site 30 consists of two locations in the same sector. The air sampler is located 0.5 miles from the reactor to support construction of a new facility. The TLD is located at the site boundary in the same sector.
- 7.
Site 40 (11.9 mi. SSE) serves as a control location for garden monitoring which is the location of the Station's Emergency Operating Facility.
- 8.
Sites 100 (B-I), 104 (B-9), 105 (DW-11), 107 (B-28), 109 (B-35), 111 (GW-8), and 115 (GW-15) have been removed from required ground water sampling due to site construction activities and hydrogeological evaluations.
10
Table 4 - Results of the 2013 Land Use Census Verification No.
No.
Sector Nearest Residence Miles Nearest Garden Miles Nearest Cattle Milked Miles Nearest Goat Milked Miles N
P. Oliver 3.73 NNE Thomas K. Crumblin 2.9 Eddie Robinson 3.99 Eddie Robinson 0
3.99 NE Gregrey Guinyard Jr.
1.55 Edna Richards 3.21 ENE Essie Gregg 1.56 Essie Mae Glenn 1.68 E
Sheryl A. Colley (A) 1.2 ESE Carrie Lee Martin 1.1 James Pearson 1.36 SE Mary White 1.44 Mary White 1.44 Sim Roberts 0
4.7 SSE Ronnie Mann 2.39 Ronnie Mann 2.39 S
Kelly Boulware 3.56 Kelly Boulware 3.56 Shirley Counts 0
5 SSW Nick Bates 3.11 Nora Wicker 3.77 Joe Smith 0
4.73 SW Marvin Miller 3.3 Marvin Miller 3.3 WSW Ron Hope 2.9 Steve All 4.83 KenNirg Graham (*)
0 4.98 Steve All 0
4.83 W
Jerry Cassado 2.55 Marion Livingston 2.8 Marion Livingston 0
2 W
I KenNirg Graham (*)
90 5
WNW Unknown Residence 2.53 Ronnie Leitzey 4.72 Ronnie Leitzey 1
4.15 Ronnie Leitzey 15 4.15 NW Louise Workman 3.9 NNW Frank March 2.9 Frank March 2.9 Frank March 0
2.9 (A) Change In Closest Residence
(*) Keneth and Virgil Graham cows grazed in the W and WSW 11
Table 5 Critical Receptor Evaluation for 2013 NAME SECTOR MILES PATHWAY X/Q DIQ DOSE*
mRem/y P. Oliver N
3.73 Res 1.70E-07 5.90E-10 6.39E-03 Thomas K. Crumblin NNE 2.9 Res 3.70E-07 1.20E-09 1.39E-02 Eddie Robinson NNE 3.99 B,Gar 2.OOE-07 5.70E-10 2.07E-01 Gregrey Guinyard Jr.
NE 1.55 Res 1.80E-06 5.80E-09 6.74E-02 Edna Richards NE 3.21 ResGar 4.OOE-07 1.OOE-09 2.81 E-01 Bessie Gregg ENE 1.56 Res 2.OOE-06 6.30E-09 7.48E-02 Essie Mae Glenn 1 ENE 1.68 ResGar 1.70E-06 5.30E-09 1.45E+00 Garden-7**
E 1
ResGar 4.1OE-06 1.40E-08 3.78E+00 Sheryl A. Colley E
1.2 Res 2.70E-06 8.80E-09 1.01E-01 Garden-6 **
ESE 1
ResGar 2.70E-06 9.20E-09 2.48E+00 Carrie Lee Martin ESE 1.1 Res 2.20E-06 7.20E-09 8.25E-02 James Pearson ESE 1.36 ResGar 1.30E-06 4.20E-09 1.14E+00 Mary White SE 1.44 ResGar 7.80E-07 3.1OE-09 8.24E-01 Sim Roberts SE 4.7 Res,Gar,B 6.40E-08 1.90E-10 7.12E-02 Ronnie Mann SSE 2.39 ResGar 1.70E-07 8.90E-10 2.31 E-01 Kelly Boulware S
3.56 Res,Gar 8.50E-08 4.80E-10 1.24E-01 Shirley Counts S
5 Res,Gar,B 4.20E-08 2.30E-10 8.24E-02 NND Construction Site SSW 0.49 Res 6.20E-06 5.50E-08 2.50E-01 Nick Bates SSW 3.11 Res 1.10E-07 8.30E-10 4.36E-03 Nora Wicker SSW 3.77 Res,Gar 7.1OE-08 5.30E-10 1.34E-01 Joe Smith SSW 4.73 Res,B 4.40E-08 3.20E-10 3.35E-02 Marvin Miller SW 3.3 ResGar 9.60E-08 9.30E-10 2.33E-01 Ron Hope WSW 2.9 Res 9.60E-08 9.10E-10 3.90E-03 Steve All WSW 4.83 Res,Gar,G 3.20E-08 2.90E-10 7.63E-02 KenNirg Graham WSW 4.98 B
3.OOE-08 2.70E-10 2.68E-02 Jerry Cassado W
2.55 Res 1.20E-07 7.20E-10 4.66E-03 Marion Livingston W
2 B
2.OOE-07 1.30E-09 1.29E-01 Marion Livingston W
2.8 ResGar 9.40E-08 5.80E-10 1.49E-01 Marion Livingston W
2 & 2.8 Res,Gar,B BOTH BOTH 2.78E-01 KenNirg Graham W
5 Res,Gar,B,C/M 2.80E-08 1.60E-10 1.99E-01 Unknown Resident WNW 2.53 Res 9.20E-08 4.10E-10 3.50E-03 Ronnie Leitzsey WNW 4.15 C/MB,G/M,G 3.30E-08 1.30E-10 1.29E-01 Ronnie Leitzsey WNW 4.72 ResGar 2.50E-08 1.O0E-10 2.66E-02 Ronnie Leitzsey WNW 4.15 & 4.72 Res,GarC/M,B,G/M,G BOTH BOTH 1.56E-01 Louise Workman NW 3.9 Res 7.60E-08 3.10E-10 2.88E-03 Frank March NNW 2.9 Res,Gar,B 3.10E-07 1.OOE-09 3.72E-01 ODCM ORGAN DOSE E
1.1 ResGar 3.30E-06 1.1OE-08 2.98E+00 Pathway Res = Residence B = Beef G = Goat Gar = Garden C/M = Cow/Milk(Infant)
G/M = Cow/Milk(Infant)
Footnotes:
Maximum exposed individual.
Hypothetical dose based on Operating License Environmental Report Source Term.
ODCM required environmental gardens.
12
Table 6 - Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Specifications Exposure Criteria for Selection of Sampling and Collection Sample Type & Frequency of Pathway and/or Sample Number & Location Frequency Location Analysis Sample
____________________ Li
_________I AIRBORNE:
I. Particulate A) 3 Indicator samples to be Continuous sampler operation 2
Gross beta following filter taken at locations (in with weekly collection.
7 change; Quarterly different sectors) beyond 30 composite (by location) but as close to the for gamma isotopic.
exclusion boundary as practicable wherethe highest offsite sector ground level concentrations are anticipated.2 B) 1 Indicator sample to be Continuous sampler operation 6
Gross beta following filter, taken in the sector beyond with weekly collection.
change; Quarterly but as close to the composite (by location),
exclusion boundary as for gamma isotopic.
practicable corresponding to the residence having the highest anticipated offsite ground level concentration or dose.2 C) 1 Indicator sample to be Continuous sampler operation N/A Gross beta following filter taken at the location of one with weekly collection, change; Quarterly.
of the dairies being composite (by location) sampled meeting the for gamma isotopic.
criteria of VII(A).2 4 D) 1 Control sample to be Continuous sampler operation 17 Gross beta following filter taken at a location at least with weekly collection, change; Quarterly 10 air miles from the site composite (by location) and not in the most for gamma isotopic.
prevalent wind directions.
2 II. Radioiodine A) 3 Indicator samples to be Continuous sampler operation 2
Gamma Isotopic for taken at two locations as with weekly canister collection.
7 Iodine 131 weekly.
given in I(A) above.
30 B) 1 Indicator sample to be Continuous sampler operation 6
Gamma Isotopic for taken at the location as with weekly canister collection.
Iodine 131 weekly.
given in I(B) above.
C) 1 Indicator sample to be Continuous sampler operation N/A Gamma Isotopic for taken at the location as with weekly canister collection.
Iodine 131 weekly.
given in I(C) above.
D) 1 Control sample to be Continuous sampler operation 17 Gamma Isotopic for taken at a location similar with weekly canister collection.
Iodine 131 weekly.
in nature to I(D) above.
13
Exposure Criteria for Selection of Sampling and Collection Sample Type & Frequency of Pathway and/or Sample Number & Location Frequency Location Analysis Sample ID
__________________________ai Ill. Direct A) 13 Indicator stations to Monthly or quarterly 12,3,4,5,6, Gamma dose monthly or form and inner ring of exchange5 '7 two or more 7,8,9,10,29, quarterly.
stations in the 13 dosimeters at each location.
30,47 accessible sectors within 1 to 2 miles of the plant.
B) 16 indicator stations to form Monthly or quarterly 12,13,32,33, Gamma dose monthly or an outer ring of stations in exchange5 '7 two or more 34,35,36,37, quarterly.
the 16 accessible sectors dosimeters at each location.
41,42,43,44, within 3 to 5 miles of the 46,53,55,60 plant.
C) 11 Stations to be placed in Quarterly exchange7 ; two or 16,17,18,19, Gamma dose quarterly.
special interest areas such more dosimeters at each 20,31,45,52, as population centers, location.
54,56,58 nearby residences, schools and in 4 or 5 areas to serve as controls.
WATERBORNE IV. Surface A) 1 Indicator sample Time composite samples6 with 213 Gamma isotopic monthly Water downstream to be taken at collection every month.5 with quarterly composite a location which allows for (by location) to be mixing a dilution in the analyzed for tritium.7 ultimate receiving river.
B) 1 Control sample to be Time composite samples6 with 223 Gamma isotopic monthly taken at a location on the collection every month. 5 with quarterly composite griver sufficiently (by location) to be receiving rie ufcetyanalyzed for triti um.7 far upstream such that no effects of pumped storage operation are anticipated.
C) 1 Indicator sample to be Time composite samples6with 233 Gamma isotopic monthly taken in the upper reservoir collection every month.5 with quarterly composite of the pumped storage (by location) to be facility at the plant analyzed for tritium.7 discharge canal.
V. Ground Water A) 12 Indicator samples to be Quarterly grab sampling. 7 6, 26, 27, Gamma isotopic and taken within the exclusion 101-103, tritium analyses boundary and in the
- 106, quarterly.7 direction of potentially 108,110, affected ground water 112-114 supplies.
B) 1 Control sample from Quarterly grab sampling.7 59 Gamma isotopic and unaffected location.
tritium analyses quarterly.7 14
Exposure a
r Criteria for Selection of Sampling and Collection Sample Type & Frequency of Pathway and/or Sample Number & Location Frequency Location Analysis VI. Drinking A) 1 Indicator sample from a Monthly grab sampling.5 28 Monthly5 gamma isotopic Water nearby public ground water and gross beta analyses supply source.
and quarterly7 composite for tritium analyses.
B) 1 Indicator (finished water)
Monthly composite sampling.
17 Monthly5 gamma isotopic sample from the nearest and gross beta analyses downstream water supply.
and quarterly7 composite for tritium analyses.
C) 1 Control (finished water)
Monthly composite sampling.
39 Monthly5 gamma isotopic sample from an unaffected and gross beta analyses water supply.
and quarterly7 composite for tritium analyses.
INGESTION:
VII. Milk4 A) Samples from milking animals in 3 locations within 5 km having the highest dose potential. If there are none then 1 sample from milking animals in each of 3 areas between 5 to 8 km distance where doses are calculated to be greater than 1 mrem per year. 10 B) 1 Control sample to be taken at the location of a dairy > 20 miles distance and not in the most prevalent wind direction.2 C) 1 Indicator grass (forage) sample to be taken at the location of one of the dairies being sampled meeting the criteria of VII(A),above, when animals are on pasture.
D) 1 Control grass (forage) sample to be taken at the location of VII(B) above.
Semimonthly when animals are on pasture8 5 monthly other times.5 Semimonthly when animals are on pasture5 ' monthly other times.5 -11 Monthly when available.5 Monthly when available.511 To be supplied when milk animals are found in accordance with criteria VII.A.
16 To be supplied when milk animals are found in accordance with criteria VII.A.
16 Gamma isotopic and I-131 analysis semimonthly5 when animals are on pasture, monthly other times.5 Gamma isotopic and I-131 analysis semimonthly8 when animals are on pasture, monthly other times.5 Gamma isotopic.
Gamma isotopic.
15
Exposure Criteria for Selection of Sampling and Collection Sample Type & Frequency of Pathway and/or Sample Number & Location Frequency Location Analysis Sample
.1 _____________________1i VIII. Food A) 2 Indicator samples of Monthly when available.5 6
Gamma isotopic on edible Products broadleaf vegetation grown 7
portion.
in the 2 nearest offsite location of highest calculated annual average ground level D/Q if milk sampling is not performed within 3 km or if milk sampling is not performed at a location within 5-8 km where the doses are calculated to be greater than 1 mrem/yr. 10 B) 1 Control sample for the Monthly when available."
40 Gamma isotopic on edible same foods taken at least portion.
10 miles distance and not in the most prevalent wind direction if milk sampling is not performed within 3 km or if milk sampling is not performed at a location within 5 to 8 km where the doses are calculated to be greater than 1 mrem/yr.10 IX. Fish A) 1 Indicator sample to be Semiannual9 collection.1 233 Gamma isotopic on edible taken at a location in the portions semiannually. 9 upper reservoir.
B) 1 Indicator sample to be Semiannual9 collection.'
213 Gamma isotopic on edible taken at a location in the portions semiannually. 9 lower reservoir.
C) 1 Control sample to be Semiannual9 collection. '
223 Gamma isotopic on edible taken at a location on the portions semiannually. 9 receiving river sufficiently far upstream such that no effects of pumped storage operation are anticipated.
AQUATIC:
X. Sediment A) 1 Indicator sample to be Semiannual grab sample. 9 233 Gamma isotopic.
taken at a location in the upper reservoir.
B) 1 Indicator sample to be Semiannual grab sample.9 213 Gamma isotopic.
taken on or near the shoreline of the lower reservoir.
C) 1 Control sample to be Semiannual grab sample.9 223 Gamma isotopic.
taken at a location on the receiving river sufficiently far upstream such that no effects of pumped storage operation are anticipated.
16
Table 6 (cont) - Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Specifications FOOTNOTES
- 1.
Fish include 3 groups (Bass, Bream/Crappie, Caffish/Carp.)
- 2.
Sample site locations are based on 5-year average meteorological analysis.
- 3.
Though generalized areas are noted for simplicity of sample site enumeration, airborne, water and sediment sampling is done at the same location, whereas biological sampling sites are generalized areas in order to reasonably assure availability of samples.
- 4.
Milking animal and garden survey results will be analyzed annually. If the survey should indicate new activity the owners shall be contacted with regard to a contract for supplying sufficient samples. If contractual arrangements can be made, site(s) will be added for additional milk sampling up to a total of three Indicator locations.
- 5.
Not to exceed 35 days.
- 6.
Time composite samples are samples which are collected with equipment capable of collecting an aliquot at time intervals which are short relative to the compositing period.
- 7.
At least once per 100 days.
- 8.
At least once per 18 days.
- 9.
At least once per 200 days.
- 10.
The dose shall be calculated for the maximum organ and age group, using the guidance/methodology contained in Regulatory Guide 1.109, Rev. 1 and the parameters particular to the site.
- 11.
Milk and forage sampling at the control location is only required when locations meeting the criteria of VII(A) are being sampled.
17
Table 7 - Supplemental Radiological Environmental Monitoring Exposure Pathway Criteria for Selection of Sampling and Sample Type & Frequency of and/or Sample Sample Number & Location Collection Frequency Location Analysis AIRBORNE:
S-I.
Particulate A) 1 Indicator sample Continuous sampler 8
Gross beta following monitoring the nearest operation with weekly filter change; Monthly community with the highest collection.
Composite (by anticipated dose or ground location) for gamma level concentration.
isotopic.
S-Il.
Radioiodine A) 1 Indicator sample to be Continuous sampler 8
Gamma isotopic for I-taken from the location of operation with weekly 131 weekly.
S-1 (A) above, collection.
S-Ill.
Direct A) 5 stations to be placed Quarterly exchange 7; two 61,62,63, Gamma dose within the exclusion or more dosimeters at 68 & 99 quarterly.
boundary.
each location.
B) 2 stations to be placed Quarterly exchange7 ; two 94,97 Gamma dose around VCSNS sludge or more dosimeters at quarterly.
lagoons.
each location.
WATERBORNE:
S-IV.
Surface A) 1 indicator sample to be Composite samples with 77 Gamma isotopic and Water taken of the combined monthly collection. 13' 5 tritium.
wastewater discharge.
B) 1 Indicator sample taken at Daily sample with 72,73 Gamma isotopic and each storm drain outfall.
monthly composite.
S-VI.
Drinking A) 1 Indicator (finished water)
Quarterly.
99 Quarterly gamma Water sample to be taken on site.
isotopic, gross beta and tritium analysis.
B) 1 Indicator (finished water)
Quarterly.
31 Quarterly gamma sample of public system.
isotopic, gross beta and tritium analysis.
18
Exposure Pathway Criteria for Selection of Sampling and Sample Type & Frequency of and/or Sample Sample Number & Location Ji Collection Frequency Location Analysis INGESTION:
S-VII. Milk 4 S-VII. Milk 4 A) 1 Sample from one of the nearest affected dairies at or beyond 5 miles.
B) 1 Control sample to be taken at the location of a dairy greater than 20 miles distance and not in the most prevalent wind direction.
C) 1 Indicator grass (forage) sample to be taken at the location of S-VII(A) above.
D) 1 Control grass (forage) sample to be taken at the location of S-VII(B) above.
E) 2 Indicator grass (forage) samples to be taken at 2 of the locations beyond but as close to the exclusion boundary as practical where the highest offsite sectorial ground level concentrations are anticipated.
F) 1 Control grass (forage) sample to be used for routine monitoring along with S-VII(E) above.
G) 1 Indicator grass (forage) sample to be taken at location of penstock leak.
Biweekly grab sam ple.5,14,*
Biweekly grab sample.",+
Monthly when available.
14 Monthly when available.
14 Monthly when available.
Monthly when available.
Quarterly when available.
14 16 14 16 2,7 40 25 Gamma isotopic and I-131 analysis biweekly.
Gamma isotopic and I-131 analysis biweekly.
Gamma isotopic.
Gamma isotopic.
Gamma isotopic.
Gamma isotopic.
Gamma isotopic.
S-VIII. Food Products Corbicula A) 1 Indicator sample of various types of foods grown in the area surrounding the plant (root, fruit, grain).
B) 1 Control sample of various types of foods grown. (root, fruit, grain).
C) 1 Indicator sample of edible portions.
Annually during growing season.
11 Annually during growing season.
11 Semiannual.
6,7 40 23 Gamma isotopic on edible portion.
Gamma isotopic on edible portion.
Gamma isotopic.
a a
a.
19
Exposure Pathway Criteria for Selection of Sampling and 1I Sample Type & Frequency of andlor Sample Sample Number & Location Collection Frequency Location Analysis S-IX.
Sediment/
A) 1 Indicator sample from Semiannually.
72,73 Gamma isotopic.
Sludge each storm drain outfall.
B) 3 Indicator sludge Semiannually.
On site Gamma isotopic.
samples taken at sludge lagoons 006A, 006B &
008.
S-X.
Ground Water A) 9 Indicator samples to be taken Quarterly grab sampling.7 107,111, Gamma isotopic and within the exclusion boundary 115 -121 tritium analyses and in the direction of potentially quarterly.7 affected ground water supplies.
20
Table 7 (cont) - Supplemental Radiological Environmental Monitoring FOOTNOTES
- 1.
Reserved for future use.
- 2.
Reserved for future use.
- 3.
Reserved for future use.
- 4.
Milking animal and garden survey results will be analyzed annually. If the survey should indicate new activity the owners shall be contacted with regard to a contract for supplying sufficient samples. If contractual arrangements can be made, site(s) will be added for additional milk sampling up to a total of 3 Indicator locations.
- 5.
Not to exceed 35 days.
- 6.
Reserved for future use.
- 7.
At least once per 100 days.
- 8.
At least once per 18 days.
- 9.
At least once per 200 days.
- 10.
Reserved for future use.
- 11.
At least once per 400 days.
- 12.
Reserved for future use.
- 13.
Weekly, when circulating water is not operational.
- 14.
Milk and grass (forage) sampling is not required unless VCSNS gaseous releases exceed 5% of quarterly organ dose limits or radionuclides (attributed to VCSNS operation) are detected in broadleaf vegetation, grass or air samples at concentrations greater than required LLD. Sampling should continue for two months after plant releases are reduced to less than trigger levels and milk contamination levels have returned to background levels.
+
The ODCM requires semimonthly sampling when animals are on pasture, monthly at other times.
21
Table 8 - Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Summary for 2013 Location with Highest Annual Mean Number of Medium or Type and Total Lower Limit Control Locations Nonroutine Pathway Sampled Number of of Detection2 Mean3 (#/total #)
Name Mean3 (#/total #)
Mean3 (#/total #)
Reported 4 (Unit of Analyses Actual Meanta)
(Distance & Direction)
(Range)
(Range)
Meported4 Measurement)
Performed' (Max.)
(Range)
Measurements Air Particulate Gross Beta 5.98E-3 2.02E-2 (257/257)
Site 7, Environmental 2.34E-2 (51/51) 1.84E-2 (52/52) 0 (pCi/m 3)
(309)
(1.OE-2)
(5.44E-3 to 3.91 E-2)
Lab Garden, (1.01 E-2 to 3.90E-2)
(7.94E-3 to 3.50E-2)
(1.0 mi. E)
Gamma Spec (72)
C*s 1.78E-3 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(5.OE-2) 13Cs 7.47E-3 All < LLD All < LLD 0
1 1_ (6.OE-2)
Air Radioiodine 1 (310) 1.75E-2 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(pCi/m
- 3)
I I
(7.0E-2)
Direct (TLD)5 Gamma(1 34) 8.41 E+0 (114/114)
Site 47, Fairfield 1.17E+1 (4/4) 8.43E+0 (20/20) 0 (IAR/hr)
Quarterly N/A (5.54E+O to 1.21E+1)
Tailrace, (1.0 mi. NW)
(1.11E+1 to 1.21E+1)
(5.51+0 to 1.16E+1)
Gamma(23) 8.97E+0 (23/23)
Site 52, Monticello Rd.
1.17E+1 (4/4)
N/A 0
Special Interest N/A (5.20E+O to 1.23E+1) 11, (3.8 mi. NNE)
(1.08E+1 to 1.23E+1)
Surface Water 3H (36) 5.44+2 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(pCi/I)
(2.0E+3)
Gamma Spec(36)
ýMn 2.27E+0 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(1.5E+1)
=bCo 2.38E+0 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(1.5E+1) tUFe 5.31 E+0 All < LLD All < LLD 0
bUCo 2.40E+0 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(1.5E+1) bbZn 4.62E+0 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(3.OE+1) 9bZr 4.41 E+0 All < LLD All < LLD 0
9tNb 2.81 E+0 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(1.5E+1)
'JCs 1.98E+0 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(1.5E+1) 22
Table 8 (cont.) - Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Summary for 2013 Location with Highest Annual Mean Number of Medium or Type and Total Lower Limit All Indicator Locations Control Locations Nonroutine Pathway Number of of Mean 3 (#/total #)
Name Mean3 (#/total #)
Mean3 (#/total #)
Reported 4 Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detection (Range)
(Distance & Direction)
(Range)
(Range)
Measurements Measurement)
Performed1 Actual (Max.)
Surface Water
'TICs 2.34E+0 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(Continued)
(1.8E+1) 14UBa 1.73E+1 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(6.OE+1) l 4ULa 6.00E+0 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(1.5E+1)
Ground Water 3H (52) 5.44E+2 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(pCi/I) 2.00E+3 Gamma Spec (52)
`Mn 7.72E+0 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(1.5E+1) bCo 6.01 E+0 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(I.5E+I)
WFe 1.13E+1 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(3.OE+1) bUCo 9.40E+0 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(1.5E+1) bbZn 1.35E+1 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(3.OE+1)
UZr 1.06E+1 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(3.OE+1)
UbNb 7.44E+0 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(1.5E+1) 1 3Cs 5.75E+0 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(1.5E+1) 7.57E+0 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(1.8E+1) l4UBa 3.18E+1 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(6.OE+1)
I II_
I 14ULa 1.03E+1 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(1.5E+1) 23
Table 8 (Cont.) - Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Summary for 2013 Location with Highest Annual Mean Number of Medium or Type and Total Lower Limit All Indicator Locations Control Locations Nonroutine Pathway Number of of Mean3 (#1total #)
Name Mean 3 (#/total #)
Mean 3 (#/total #)
Reported4 Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detection 2 (Range)
(Distance & Direction)
(Range)
(Range)
Measurements Measurement)
Performed1 Actual (Max.)
Drinking Water8 Gross Beta (36) 1.56E+O 1.99E+O (15/24)
Site 28, New Nuclear 2.08E+O (7/12) 2.19E+O (8/12) 0 (pCi/I)
(4.OOE+0)
(1.46E+0 to 2.71 E+0)
Deployment, (1.47E+0 to 2.71 E+0)
(1.59E+O to 3.OOE+O)
(2.6 mi, SSE)
(2.05+3)
Gamma Spec
ý72)9 0Mn 6.17E+ 0 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(1.5E+ 1) btCo 6.OOE+ 0 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(1.5E+ 1) b'Fe 1.18E+ 1 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(3.05+i 1) bUCo 6.30E+ 0 All < LLD All-< LLD 0
(1.5E+ 1) bbZn 1.38E+1 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(3.05+ 1) 9bZr 1.04E+ 1 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(3.0E+ 1) ubNb 8.97E+ 0 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(1.5E + 1) 1311 5.19E-1 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(1.0E+ 0) 13 4Cs 6.16E+ 0 All < LLD All-< LLD 0
(1.5E + 1) 1J/Cs 6.16E+ 0 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(1.8E + 1) l4UBa 2.17E+ 1 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(6.OE+ 1) l4ULa 8.14E+ 0 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(1.5E+ 1) 24
Table 8 (Cont.) - Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Summary for 2013 Location with Highest Annual Mean Number of Medium or Type and Total Lower Limit All Indicator Locations Control Locations Nonroutine Pathway Number of of Meant3 (#/total #)
Name Mean3 (#rtotal #)
Mean3 (#/tota #)
Reported4 Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detection2 (Range)
(Distance & Direction)
(Range)
(Range)
Measurements Measurement)
Performed1 Actual (Max.)
Broadleaf Gamma Spec Vegetation (36)
(pCi/kg wet) 1*11 2.37E+1 All < LLD All < LLD 0
O(6.E+
1) 1*Cs 2.05E+1 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(6.OE+ 1) 3Cs 2.36E+1 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(8.0E+ 1)
Fish 7 Gamma Spec (pCi/kg wet)
(18)
'Mn 2.59E+1 All < LLD All < LLD 0
_(1.3E+
2) 3bCo 3.83E+1 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(1.3E+ 2) bFe 6.95E+1 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(2.6E+ 2) bUCo 2.89E+1 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(1.3E+2) bZn 7.48E+1 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(2.6E+2) 1.89E+1 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(1.3E+2) 1Cs 3.83E+1 1.75E+1 (1/12)
Site 21, Parr 1.75E+1 (1/6)
All < LLD 0
(1.5E+2)
(1.75E+1 to 1.75E+1)
Reservoir, (1.75E+1 to 1.75E+1)
I I
(2.7mi. SSW) 25
Table 8 (Cont.) - Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Summary for 2013 Location with Highest Annual Mean Number of Medium or Type and Total Lower Limit All Indicator Locations Control Locations Nonroutine Pathway Number of of 2
Mean3 (#/total #)
Name Mean&3 (Dtotal #)
Mean3 (#/total #)
Reported4 Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detection (Range)
(Distance & Direction)
(Range)
(Range)
Measurements Measurement)
Performed' Actual (Max.)
Sediment Gamma Spec (6)
(pCi/kg)"8 5Mn 1.85E+1 All < LLD All < LLD 0
N/A bbCo 1.67E+1 All < LLD All < LLD 0
N/A buCo 2.33E+1 All < LLD All < LLD 0
N/A I"ACs 1.44E+1 All < LLD All.< LLD 0
(1.5E+2)
- Cs 4.14E+1 (4/4)
Site 21, Parr 5.28E+1 (2/2) 5.35E+1 (2/2) 0 (1.90E+1 to 7.07E+1)
Reservoir, (2.7 mi.
(3.49E+1 to 7.07E+1)
(1.74E+1 to 8.96E+1)
(1.8E+2)
SSVV) 26
Table 8 (cont) - Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Summary for 2013 Footnotes
- 1.
Includes indicator and control analyses. Site 8, Air Particulates and Air Radioiodines are included as indicators. Does not include other supplemental samples.
- 2.
Values given are maximum MDA values for indicator locations calculated from the program data analyses. The maximum acceptable LLD values allowed from NRC guidelines are given in parentheses.
- 3.
Mean and range are based on detectable measurements only. The fractions of detectable measurements (i.e., number of positive results/total number of measurements) at specific locations are indicated in parentheses.
- 4.
Any confirmed measured level of radioactivity in any environmental medium that exceeds the reporting requirements of ODCM, Section 1.4.1.2.
- 5.
Detection sensitivity is approximately 10 mrem/yr (1.0 [iR/hr).
- 6.
Elevated levels of 214Pb and 214Bi were observed in Jenkinsville drinking water samples.
The values are not reported here because they are naturally occurring (do not originate from VCSNS) and furnish no quantifiable information of interest.
- 7.
Fish include 3 groups (Bass, Bream/Crappie, Catfish/Carp.)
- 8.
Elevated levels of 2 14 Pb and 2 14 Bi plus other 2 26Ra daughter products and 2 2 8 Ac plus other 23 2Th daughter products were observed in all sediment samples. The values are not reported here because they are naturally occurring (do not originate from VCSNS) and furnish no quantifiable information of interest.
- 9.
Drinking water resin prepared and counted for 1311 as separate sample.
All measurements had positive results, no MDA values calculated.
27
Table 9-Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Preoperational (Baseline) Summary Location with Hiahest Annual Mean Medium or Pathway Type and Total Lower Limit of All Indicator Control Locations Number of Sampled (Unit of Number of 2
Name Mean (#/total #)
Nonroutine Mesrmn n
nlss Detection' Actual Locations Meanz (Distance & Direction)
(Range)
Mean' (#/total #)
Rpre Measurement and Analyses (a,
- ttl#
Rne Rne e~td Reporting Period)
Performed (Max.)
(#/total #) (Range)
(Range)
Measurements Air Particulate Gross Beta 4.1E-3 1.1E-1 (562/564)4 Site 13, North Dam, 1.3E-1 (52/52) 1.2E-1 (153/155) 0 (pCi/m 3)
(1300)
(1.OE-2)
(1.3E-2 to 5.5E-1)
(2.9 mi NNW)
(2.1E-2 to 5.5E-1)
(7.9E-3 to 6.1 E-1)
(1981-1982) 2.7E-2 (456/462)4 Site 8, Mon. Res. S of 3.OE-2 (42/42) 2.8E-2 (125/126)
(9.3E-3 to 6.6E-2)
Rd 224, (1.5 ENE)
(1.2E-2 to 6.OE-2)
(1.2E-2 to 5.8E-2)
Gamma Spec Cs 3.OE-3 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(1.OE-2) 13Cs 3.1E-3 3.2E-3 (22/241)
Site 10, Met Tower, 3.8E-3 (2/22) 4.2E-3 (4/66) 0 (1.OE-2)
(1.5E-3 to 5.2E-3)
(2.4 mi NNE)
(2.5E-3 to 5.2E-3)
(3.2E-3 to 5.6E-3)
Air Radioiodine 151 1(290) 3.6E-2 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(pCi/m 3) (1982)
(7.0E-2)
Direct (TLD)5 Gamma (1220) 0.5 9.9 (915/915)
Site 13, North Dam, 13.1 (61/61) 9.7 (305/305) 0 (pR/hr)
Monthly N/A (6.7 to 14.7)
(2.9 mi NNW)
(12.2 to 14.2)
(6.4 to 13.5)
(1978-1982)
Gamma (161) 0.5 10.2 (154/154)
Site 55, St. Barnabas 14.0(7/7) 0 Quarterly N/A (6.8 to 14.7)
Church, (2.8 mi E)
(13.1 to 14.7)
Surface Water 0
(pCi/I) 3H (43) 1.1 E+3 1.4E+3 (18/29)
Site 17, Columbia 1.6E+3 (2/7) 1.2E+3 (6/14)
(1981-1982)
(2.OE+3)
(1.1E+3 to 2.4E+3)
Canal, (24.7 mi, SE)
(1.4E+3 tol.8E+3)
(6.7E+2 to 1.6E+3)
Gamma Spec Q140)
Mn 2.7E-1 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(1.5E+1) bbCo 2.9E-1 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(1.5E+1) bvFe 6.OE+0 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(3.OE+1) bUCo 2.4E-1 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(1.5E+1) b5Zn 7.9E-1 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(3.OE+1) v'Zr 5.2E-1 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(1.5E+1) vtNb 3.3E-1 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(1.5E+1) 13Cs 3.OE-1 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(1.5E+1) 28
Location with Highest Annual Mean Medium or Pathway Type and Total Lower Limit of All Indicator Control Locations Number of Sampled (Unit of Number of 2
Name Mean2 (#/total #
2 (#ItotaI#)
Nonroutine Mesrmn n
nlss Detection' Actual Locations Meanz (Distance & Direction)
(Range) mean Reportal
- )
Measurement and Analyses (a,
- ttl#
Rne Rne e~td Reporting Period)
Performed (Max.)
(#/total #) (Range)
(Range)
Measurements 1Cs 2.2E-1 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(1.8E+1) 14UBa 2.2E+0 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(6.OE+l) l 4ULa 5.5E-1 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(1982 only)
(1.5E+l)
Ground Water Site 26, Onsite Well 1.6E+3 (8/8) 1.3E+3 (13/13)
(pCi/I)
H (29) 9.OE+2 1.5E+3 (16/16)
P4, (9.5E+2 to 2.3E+3)
(1.OE+3 to 1.9E+3) 0 (1981-1982)
(2.0E+3)
(9.5E+2 to 2.3E+3)
(265 ft, W)
Gamma Spec (32)
]Mn 3.7E+O All < LLD All < LLD 0
(1.5E+1)
(1.5E+1) b9Fe 7.8E+0 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(3.0E+1) bUCO 3.8E+0 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(1.5E+1)
(3.0E+1) u'Zr 6.8E+0 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(1.5E+1) vtNb 4.6E+0 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(1.5E+1)
ICs 3.7E+0 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(1.5E + 1) 13Cs 3.8E+0 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(1.8E + 1) 14UBa 1.9E+1 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(6.OE+1) 14ULa 5.OEO All < LLD All < LLD 0
(1982 only)
(1.5E+1)
Drinking Water6 Gross Beta 7 (2.OE+0)
(pCi/I) (1981-1982)
- H (14) 6.3E+2 7.8E+2 (6/14)
Site 28, Jenkinsville, 8.4E+2 (3/7) 0 (1.OE+3)
(6.8E+2 to 9.8E+2)
(2.0 mi SE)7 (7.OE+2 to 9.8E+2)
Gamma Spec (44) 4Mn 3.OE-1 All < LLD 0
(1.5E+1) bBCo 2.7E-1 All < LLD 0
(1.5E+I1)
I I
29
Location with Highest Annual Mean Medium or Pathway Type and Total Lower Limit of All Indicator Control Locations Number of Sampled (Unit of Number of Detectionw Actual Locations Mean2 Name Mean2 (#1total #)
Control#Locations Nonroutine Measurementin Periodand Performeds (Max.)
(#/total #) (Range)
(Distance & Direction)
(Range)
(Range)
M Reportedm RepotingPerod) erfomedMeasurements bFe 9.6E0 All < LLD 0
(3.OE+1) bUCo 2.6E-1 All < LLD 0
_____=n (1.5E+1) 3.4E-1 All < LLD 0
(3.OE+1)
=Zr 4.8E-1 All < LLD 0
(1.5E+1) 1311 3.4E-1 All < LLD 0
(1.5E+1)
U'Nb 7.4E-1 All < LLD 0
(1.0E+0) 1*4Cs 2.2E-1 All < LLD 0
(1.OE+I) 101Cs 2.4E-1 All < LLD 0
(1.8E+1) 14UBa 2.5E0 All < LLD 0
(6.0E+1) l4ULa 4.4E-1 All < LLD 0
(1982 only)
(1.5E+l)
Milk Gamma Spec (pCi/I)
(94)
(1981-1982) 1,11 6.3E-1 All < LLD All < LLD 0
I1.0E+0) 1sCs 3.3E+0 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(1.5E+1) jCs 4.6E0 4.1E+0 (8/47)
Site 14, Dairy, 4.1E+0 (8/47) 5.7E+O (37/47) 0 (1.5E+1)
(2.8E+to 6.1E+0)
(5.1 mi., W)
(2.8E+0 to 6.1EE+0)
(3.7E+0 to 9.2E+0) l4UBa 1.1E+1 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(1.5E + 1) 14ULa 4.4E+0 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(1.5E+1)
Grass (pCi/kg wet)
Gamma Spec (1981-1982)
_82 6.7E+1 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(6.OE+1) 134 Cs 2.7E+1 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(8.OE+1) 1l/Cs 3.3E+1 5.0E+1 (13/51)
Site 14, Dairy, 5.9E+1 (5/29) 1.3E+2 (6/31) 0 (8.OE+1)
(1.6E+1 to 1.6E+2)
(5.1 mi VV)
(1.6E+1 to 1.6E+2)
(1.3E+1 to 3.4E+2) 30
Location with Hilhest Annual Mean Medium or Pathway Type and Total Lower Limit of All Indicator Control Locations Number of Sampled (Unit of Number of 2
Name Mean2 (#/total #)
C Nonroutine Measurement and Analyses Detection' Actual Locations Mean (Distance & Direction)
(Range)
Mean2 (#/total #)
Reported 3 Reporting Period)
Performed (Max.)
(#/total #) (Range)
(Range)
Measurements Broadleaf Gamma Spec (10)
Vegetation (pCi/kg wet)
(1980-1982)
I 3.7E+1 All < LLD 0
(6.0E*1) 1.9E+1 All < LLD 0
(8.0E+1) 2.1E+1 3.1E+1 (2/7)
Site 2, Trans. Line, 3.6E+1 (1/1)
All < LLD 0
(8.OE+1)
(1.8E+1 to 3.6E+1)
(1.2 mi SW)
(Single Value)
Other Vegetation Gamma Spec (pCi/kg wet)
(32)
(1980-1982) 13Cs 8.4E+0 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(8.0E*1) 137Cs 1.0E+1 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(8.0E+1)
Fish (pCi/kg wet)
Gamma Spec (1980-1982) 192)
Cs 1.4E+1 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(1.3E+2) 13Cs 1.8E+1 2.8E+1 (50/71)
Site 24, Recreation 3.4E+1 (17/23) 3.1E+1 (19/21) 0 (1.3E+2)
(1.1E+I to 1.OE+2)
Lake, (5.5 mi, N) 1.2E+1 to 1.OE+2)
(1.0E+1 to 7.9E+1) bCo 2.6E+1 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(1.3E+2) 4Mn 1.8E+1 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(1.3E+2) bliFe 9.0E+1 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(2.6E+2) b5Zn 4.1E+1 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(2.6E+2) bUCo 1.8E+1 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(1.3E+2)
Sediment (pCi/kg)
Gamma Spec (24)
(1980-1982) 1ýCs 2.3E+1 All < LLD All < LLD 0
(1.5E+2) 1 Cs 2.4E+1 1.7E+2 (12/18)
Site 21, Parr 2.6E+2 (6/6) 4.2E+2 (6/6) 0 (1.5E+2)
(2.6E+1 to 4.5E+2)
Reservoir, (2.6E+1 to 4.5E+2)
(1.8E+1 to 1.OE+3)
I I____1_
1 (2.7 mi, SSW )
--I-II_
31
Table 9 (Cont.)- Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Preoperational (Baseline) Summary Footnotes
- 1.
Values given are MDA values calculated from the program data analyses with maximum acceptable LLD values allowed from NRC guidelines given in parentheses.
- 2.
Mean and range are based on detectable measurements only. The fractions of detectable measurements at specific locations are indicated in parentheses.
- 3.
A non-routine measurement is any confirmed measured level of radioactivity in an environmental medium that exceeds the reporting requirements of VCSNS ODCM, Section 1.4.1.2.
- 4.
The baseline values are high because of the fallout from the Chinese bomb test in 1980.
The first set of data reflects the 1981 baseline. The second set of data reflects the 1982 baseline, essentially free of bomb test fallout. The 1982 data covers the period 1/1/82 -
10/22/82.
- 5.
Detection sensitivity is approximately 5 mrem/yr (0.5
.R/hr) determined from the analyses of five years of preoperational data.
- 6.
No control location was specified for drinking water during the preoperational monitoring period.
- 7.
Inconclusive data.
32
Table 10 - Results of 2013 Environmental Intercomparison Program with Independent Lab, Eckert & Ziegler Analytics, Inc.
Comparison Study Date Nuclides VendorLab Env Lab Agreement (Measurement Unit) __
1c11 Results Results Gamma Isotopic Liquid 3/21 141 93 104 Yes 1 Liter 1"1Ce 179 173 Yes (pCi/I) 51Cr 452 447 Yes 1 3 4 cs 205 189 Yes 1370S 254 274 Yes 58Co 199 207 Yes 54Mn 199 212 Yes 59Fe 241 278 Yes 6 5Zn 288 313 Yes 60Co 383 404 Yes Gamma Composite Filter 9/24 5'Cr 279 268 Yes (pCi) 134 Cs 173 141 Yes 1370S 131 137 Yes 58Co 108 108 Yes 54Mn 139 154 Yes 59Fe 131 139 Yes 65Zn 267 294 Yes 60Co 197 193 Yes Alpha/Beta Water 4/18 Alpha 163 173 Yes (pCi/I)
Beta 300 324 Yes Gamma Isotopic 4/2 141Ce 2.38E-1 2.01E-1 Yes Pulverized 51Cr 5.99E-1 5.02E-1 Yes Soil 134Cs 2.72E-1 1.96E-1 No (pCi/g) 137Cs 4.23E-1 3.45E-1 Yes 58Co 2.64E-1 2.11E-1 Yes 54Mn 2.64E-1 2.27E-1 Yes 59Fe 3.20E-1 2.91E-1 Yes 65Zn 3.82E-1 3.38E-1 Yes 60Co 5.08E-1 4.13E-1 Yes 1-131 Solid 3/20 1
102 98 Yes (pCi) 33
Comparison Study VendorLab Env Lab (Measurement Unit)
Date Nuclides Results Results Agreement Tritium 4/8 3 H 14000 13800 Yes (pCi/I)
Gross Beta Filter 9/25 N/A 78 75 Yes (pCi)
Charcoal Cartridge 9/17 1311 80 88 Yes (pCi)
Gamma Isotopic Liquid 9/23 13'1 98 122 Yes 4 Liter 51Cr 251 267 Yes (pCi/I) 134Cs 156 161 Yes 137cs 118 132 Yes 58Co 97 112 Yes 54Mn 125 140 Yes 59Fe 118 138 Yes 65Zn 241 274 Yes 60Co 177 195 Yes The Gamma Isotopic for Pulverized Soil had one nuclide, 134Cs, that was not in agreement. Though all other nuclides in this Isotopic were in agreement, SCE&G Environmental Lab results were all lower than the vendor lab results.
We believe this is due to the material used to make the Inter-Comparison sample.
Normally actual sediment is provided to the vendor lab to be spiked. This particular sample was made using a substance that was less dense than our normal sediment and our sediment calibration standard.
34
Table 11 -2013 Environmental Sampling Program Exceptions Sample Month Media Location (Week No.)
Cause for Exception Air Particulate Site 30 Feb (09)
Human error. Filter loaded incorrectly in And sample head.
Radioiodine Site 7 Aug (34)
Gas meter failed.
Site 8 Nov (46)
Pump motor failed.
Ground Water Site 109 Jan (02)
Well decommissioned. No longer required by hydro-geological study.
TLD Site 20 Jan (02)
TLD missing.
Site 20 Apr (16) 1 ETLD missing, 1 remaining.
Site 35 Apr (16) 1 ETLD missing, 1 remaining.
Site 53 Apr (16) 1 ETLD missing, 1 remaining.
Site 56 Apr (16)
TLD missing.
Drinking Site 39 Jan (01)
Missed sample. Appears sample valve Water was kicked / bumped, causing sample to leak out.
35
LEGEND CONTROL SAMPLE LOCATIONS A=AIR PARTICULATE SITE D=DIRECT (TLD) SITE I=AIRBORNE RADIOIODINE SITE W=WATER SITE O=OTHER (GARDEN PRODUCTS, FISH, SEDIMENT, GRASS, MILK)
REFERENCEs THE BASE FOR THIS MAP WAS PREPARED FROM A PORTION OF USGS STATE OF GEORGIA. l970.
South Carolina Electric & Gas Co.
Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station Regional Location Map Figure 1-1 R~V flOrF I~-~
REV DAT Q-
LEGEND
.wSt.
Peters PRIMARY SAMPLE LOCATIONS 3
A= AIR PARTICULATE SAMPLE SITE
- A,
= DIRECT (TLD) SAMPLE SITE C
I = AIRBORNE RADIDIODINE SAMPLE SITE
- N '22 LO 2
W= WATER SAMPLING LOCATION i
Mo.:c I.o
]5 0
OTHER 4o St.Marks 0= TLD (D) SAMPLING LOCATIONS Ch.
3 ( 0 97 7
No. t Ch.
MnN. [rFtJL 7
In K
95 as AI.
4/
86 17G St. Br 270'-00, Ch, 41\\~~
-c......
C~s
- C&
45
.5:
)
ON.45 Lvl 9~h 45MRI Ch.
60LE 1
- V3.
.5,~Ch
~~..
0 w5 *.
St J St 9
Aottlh
~ *;SPw ~
- ,~
.202 Ch.:~
/
~47 Bidgen Ch..
4-4
\\,(
I
~
1g03?
South Carolina Electric & Gas Co.
-6 r
b X.
Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station
~v iBLR
~
- ~~
T 4 k.L
~RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM pp 4LOCAL INDICATOR SAMPLE SITES 01,
~~~igure 1-2' pv c2r
ii I
31:1 LSOI f
(A'VE LIS/
LN WH, 418
)
tD)
PRIMARYTIUOU SAMPLERLCTIN ASI imAI.M.S ov-m o
i WATER SAMPLING LA NY.IRUR\\
TRAMN. !,t`coA PLE""7 TO PARRT hl"-
/
.su"W A 6-SS:_:__..
RD"."
I7
"*.-':.::.:*4.
- 4)
LEG ND O
SAMPLERG RE 1-
'a A
.72.:.;*'.;*!.
=PI AYS M L O AIN i \\
i
- :( I / ' "
t "
- i i ~ i
- A I R P. R T I C UL A E
- M L I E,
\\.
O T -
i I
T O W
E,.:
.;; ! i :! 7.o I )ET
< *, S M ' I * < U A T, *
/f I
= ARBONE ADIIOONE AMPE STE t
=w:,.,*.,*=:t.,,,.:,.=,=*,A5,,
l,.-,
/9 ll TO P R -"0I
'w WTRS M LN O AINl
.- *.v s '
- S*I "s
I A
(D 0N\\\\,Rk..,.,*
-t-l
-"l-'l**
I!*ll*
11{"II
- L!'li~h1 llWln l
l I[
I"
- 4,
Cý-
LHLu N
W+
E KY -'-~~
111 1138 0
South Carolina Electric & Gas Co Virgil C Summer Nuclear Station RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM SECURITY AREA GROUNDWATER SITES Figure 1-4