ML14017A097

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Accepted for Review of Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 1, Request for an Alternative System Leakage Test (Rfa) ISPT-02, TAC MF3354
ML14017A097
Person / Time
Site: Watts Bar Tennessee Valley Authority icon.png
Issue date: 01/17/2014
From: Andrew Hon
Plant Licensing Branch II
To: Clearly T
Tennessee Valley Authority
Hon A NRR/DORL/LPL2-2 415-8480
References
TAC MF3354
Download: ML14017A097 (1)


Text

Chen, Qiao-Lynn From: Han, Andrew Sent: Friday, January 17, 2014 10:32 AM To: tpcleary@tva.gov; Hess, Thomas A (tahess@tva.gov)

Cc: Poole, Justin; Schrull, Edward Dustin (edschrull@tva.gov); Quichocho, Jessie; Rezai, Ali; Kulesa, Gloria; Arent, Gordon (garent@tva.gov)

Subject:

Accepted for Review of Watts Bar Nuclear Plant Unit 1 Request for Alternative system leakage test (RFA ISPT-02), TAC No. MF3354 ADAMSAccessionNumber: ML14017A097 ADAMSVersionSeriesld: {8D3485EO-CF19-49AS-99B7-DCBB063FD33A}

Dear Mr. Cleary,

By your letter dated January 10, 2014 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management Systems (ADAMS)

Accession No. ML14013A302), Tennessee Valley Authority submitted the subject Request for Alternative for system leakage test be applicable to the current, second 10-year intervallnservice Inspection System Pressure Testing (ISPT-02) for the Watts Bar Nuclear Plant Unit 1, per 10CFR 50.55a(a)(3). The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.

If you have any questions, please contact me.

(ADAMS Accession No. ML14017A097)

AndyHon, PE Project Manager (Watts Bar Nuclear Unit-1)

Plant Licensing Branch 11-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 301-415-8480 OWFN08E5 Mail Stop 08G-9a andrew. hon@nrc. gov 1