ML13331A787
| ML13331A787 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 03/11/1985 |
| From: | Zwolinski J Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Baskin K Southern California Edison Co |
| References | |
| GL-83-028 LSO5-85-03-009, LSO5-85-3-9, NUDOCS 8503150458 | |
| Download: ML13331A787 (4) | |
Text
0 UNITED STATES o1 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 March 11, 1985 Docket No.
50-206 LS05-,85-03-009 Mr. Kenneth P. Baskin, Vice President Nuclear Engineering Safety and Licensing Department Southern California Edison Company 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Post Office Box 800 Rosemead, California 91770
Dear Mr. Baskin:
SUBJECT:
REOUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOLLOWING PRELIMINARY STAFF REVIEW OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO GENERIC LETTER 83-28 Re:
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Unit No. 1 The staff has completed a preliminary review to assess the completeness and adequacy of licensee responses to Generic Letter 83-28 Items 2.1, 2.2, 3.1.3, 3.2.3, 4.4 and 4.5.
For San Onofre Unit No. 1, your responses were found to be incomplete for Items 2.2.2 and 4.5.3. Brief descriptions of the deficiencies are given as auidelines for corrective action in the enclosed request for additional information. Efforts by Owners Groups, INPO and NSSS Vendors have been or are being made to produce generic responses that may be useful in meeting the requirements of Generic Letter 83-28 Items 2.2.2 and 4.5.3.
You may wish to contact your Owners Group or INPO regarding the applicability of such generic responses to San Onofre Unit No. 1.
In order to preserve our present review schedule, the staff needs to have the supplementary information within 90 days for Item 2.2.2 and your plant specific response to Item 4.5.3 should be provided within 90 days after the NRC completes its review of WCAP-10271 and Supplement 1, and issues its evaluation. We request your cooperation in meeting this schedule.
P503150458 850311 PDR ADOCK 05000206 P
Mr. Kenneth March 11, 1985 This request for additional information was approved by the Office of Management and Budget under clearance number 3150-0011 which expires April 30, 1985. Comments on burden and duplication may be directed to the Office of Management and Budget, Reports Management Room 3208, New Executive Office Building, Washington, D.C. 20503.
Sincerely, John A. Zwolinski, Chief Operating Reactors Branch #5 Division of Licensing
Enclosure:
Request for Additional Information cc w/enclosure:
See next page DISTRIBUTION Docket NRC PDR Local PDR ORB #5 Reading H. THompson OELD B. Grimes J. Partlow W. Paulson C. Jamerson J. Zwolinski ACRS (10)
RAuluck JStevens DLasher DBeckham JHannon 9 0 DL:ORB#5Q DLW #5 DL:ORB#5 CJamerson ib Waulson JZwolinski J/11 /85 t
&/1
/85
/u /85
Mr. Kenneth P. Baskin 3 -
March 11, 1985 cc Charles R. Kocher, Assistant Joseph 0. Ward, Chief General Counsel Radiological Health Branch James Beoletto, Esquire State Department of Health Southern California Edison Company Services Post Office Box 800 714 P Street, Office Bldg. 8 Rosemead, California 91770 Sacramento, California 5314 David R. Pigott Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe 600 Montgomery Street San Francisco, California 94111 Dr. Lou Bernath San Diego Gas & Electric Company P. 0. Box 1831 San Diego, California 92112 Resident Inspector/San Onofre NPS c/o U.S.
NRC P. 0. Box 4329 San Clemente, California 92672 Mavor City of San Clemente San Clemente, California 92672 Chairman Board of Supervisors County of San Diego San Diego, California 92101 Director Energy Facilities Siting Division Eneroy Resources Conservation &
Development Commission 1516 -
9th Street Sacramento, California 95814 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Pegion IX Office ATTN:
Regional Radiation Representative 215 Freemont Street San Francisco, California 94105 John B. Martin, Regional Administrator Muclear ReCgulatory Commission, Region V 1450 Maria Lane Walrut Creek, California 94596
ENCLOSURE Request for Additional Information San Onofre Unit No. 1 Item 2.2.2 -
Incomplete The licensee's response is based on the NUTAC report. The licensee needs to present his evaluation of the NUTAC program and describe how it will be imple mented at San Onofre Unit No. 1. The staff found that the NUTAC program fails to address the concern about establishing and maintaining an Interface between all safety-related equipment vendors and the utility. Accordingly, the licensee will need to supplement his response to address this concern. This additional information should describe how current procedures will be modified and new ones initiated to meet the elements of this concern.
Item 4.5.3 -
Incomplete The staff has WCAP-10271 and Supplement 1 under review.
Completion of the review of the WCAP is expected shortly. If the licensee intends to endorse WCAP-10271 as the generic response to Item 4.5.3, then the licensee should delay submitting the plant-specific response to Item 4.5.3 until 90 days after the NRC staff completes its review of WCAP-10271 and Supplement 1 and issues Its evaluation.