ML13330A272
| ML13330A272 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 03/19/1981 |
| From: | Crutchfield D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Dietch R Southern California Edison Co |
| References | |
| LSO5-81-03-049, LSO5-81-3-49, NUDOCS 8104010770 | |
| Download: ML13330A272 (5) | |
Text
DI RIBUT-. N:
IDocket KntP DR March 19, 1981 LPDR TERA NSIC Docket No. 50-206 OR #C ORB #5 RF LSOS 81-03-049ck DCrutchfield SNowicki HSmith o."
2 Mr. R. Dietch, Vice President OELD f
9
.eNudlear Engineering and Operations AI&E (30 )
Southern California-Edison Company Gay (10) 2244 Walnut Grove.Avenue Xtra Cy (6)
Post Office Box 800 m
Rosemead, California 91770 R~ermann CBerlinger
Dear Mr. Dietch:
The NRC staff has completed its review of.your emergency plan submittal dated January 1981 which relates to improvement of emergency preparedness associated with San Onofre Unit No. 1. Your emergency plan was reviewed against the criteria stated in NUREG-0654, "Criteria for Preparation and Evaluation of Rqdiological Emergency.Plans and Preparedness in Support of Nuclear Power Plants"' Our review has indicated that additional informa tion and commitments are required before we can conclude that your onsite emergency preparedness program meets this criteria.
Enclosed are our comments for which resolution is necessary., Your emergency plan should be revised to.address these comments and a revision to the Plan provided as soon as possible. Note that your upgraded plan must be imple mented by April 1, 1981, in accordance with 10 CFR 50.54(s)(2). For those items that require an extended period of time to resolve, a commitment and completion schedule should be included as part of your response.
We would be pleased to discuss or clarify any of the information requested.
Sincerely, Original signed by Dennis M.Crutchfield Dennis M. Crutchfield, Chief Operating Reactors Branch #5 Division of Licensing Enclosure Comments on San Onofre Unit 1 Emergency Plan cc w/entlosure:
See next page 8 10 4 010776 OFFICE D D
AL.
.LA..
DL.:.
SURNAME)S w cki.
HSm DCr c ield t1.................
/ATE 1
/8]
NRC FORM.318 tl/80)NRCM 0240 OFFICIA RECORD COPY
- USGPO 1980-329-824
PkREGw.
o UNITEDSTATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 March 19, 1981 Docket No. 50-206 LS05-81-03-049 Mr. R. Dietch, Vice President Nuclear Engineering and Operations Southern California Edison Company 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Post Office Box 800 Rosemead, California 91770
Dear Mr. Dietch:
The NRC staff has completed its review of.your emergency plan submittal dated January 1981 which relates to improvement of emergency preparedness associated with. San Onofre Unit No. 1. Your emergency plan was reviewed against the criteria stated in NUREG-0654, "Criteria for Preparation and Evaluation of Radiological Emergency Plans and Preparedness in Support of Nuclear Power Plants". Our review has indicated that additional informa tion and commitments are required before we can conclude that your onsite emergency preparedness program meets this criteria.
Enclosed are our comments for which resolution is necessary. Your emergency plan should be revised to address these comments and a revision to the Plan provided as soon as possible. Note that your upgraded plan must be imple mented by April 1, 1981, in accordance with 10 CFR 50.54(s)(2). For those items that require an extended period of time to resolves a commitment and completion schedule should be included as part of your response.
We would be pleased to discuss or clarify any of the information requested.
Sincerely, Dennis 1. Crutchfield, ief Operating Reactors Branch #5 Division of Licensing
Enclosure:
Comments on San Onofre Unit 1 Emergency Plan cc w/enclosure:
See next page
Mr. R. Dietch
- 2
,March 18, 1981 cc w/enclosure:
James Beoletto, Esq.
Charles R. Kocher, Assistant Director, Criteria and Standards General Counsel Division Southern California Edison Company..
Office of Radiation Programs Post Office Box 800 (ANR-460)
'Rosemead, California 91770 U. S. Environmental Protection Agency David R. Pigott Washington, D. C. 20460 Saruel B. Casey Chickering & Gregory U. S. Environmental Protection Three Embarcadero Center Agency Twenty-Third Floor Region IX Office San Francisco, California 94111 ATTN: EIS COORDINATOR 215 Freemont Street Jack E. Thomas San Francisco, California 94111 Harry B. Stoehr San Diego Gas & Electric Company P. 0. Box 1831 San Diego, California 92112 Resident Inspector/San Onofre NPS c/o U. S. NRC P. 0. Box 4329 San Clemente, California 92672 Mission Viejo Branch Library 24851 Chrisanta Drive Mission Viejo, California 92676 Mayor City of San Clemente San Clemente, California 92672 Chai man Board of Supervisors County of San Diego San Diego, California 92101 California Department of Health ATTN: Chief, Environmental Radiation Control Unit Radiological Health Section 714 P Street, Room 498 Sacramento, California 95814
SAN ONOFRE UNIT 1 EMERGENCY PLAN Q-1 QUESTIONS*
B. ONSITE EMERGENCY ORGANIZATION B.5 It is not lear, based on the information in Sections 5.2.2 through 5.2.9 and Table 5.2, that SONGS Unit 1 has satisfied the emergency staffing level in Table B-1 of NUREG-0654 Revise the Plan to show that your staffing level and emergency augmentation capability conform with Table B-1 requirements.
B.3 The titles of persons who are in line to become emergency coordinators are confusing. For example, it is not clear if "Superintendent Unit 1" (p. 5-2) is the same as "Superintendent" (Figure 5.1), and the position "Nuclear Plant Manager" cannot be found in Figure 5.1.
Please clarify.
C. EMERGENCY RESPONSE SUPPORT AND RESOURCES l.b Describe the specific Federal resources expected, and specific local support available to these resources.
2.b Provide for dispatch of a representative to principal offsite governmental emergency operations centers.
3.c Identify radiological laboratories and their general capabilities to provide monitoring and analysis services during an emergency.
E. NOTIFICATION METHODS AND PROCEDURES E.4 Provide a copy of the form you described on p. 6-9 of your Plan.
The information contained, in this form should conform with items a-n of this sub-criterion.
The number against each question corresponds to the number of a sub-criterion in NUREG-0654, Rev.T.
-2 E.7 Describe in some detail the messages you would provide for the publ ic in accordance with provisions of this sub-criterion.
H. EMERGENCY FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT H.1 Provide information on the conceptual design of your Technical Support Center, in accordance with NUREG-0696.
H.2 Provide information on the conceptual design of your Emergency Operations Facility, in accordance with NUREG-0696.
H.3 Provide meteorological instrumentation and procedures which satisfy the criteria in Appendix 2, NUREG-0654, Rev. 1.
H.12 It is not-clear that the TSC has the capability to support the functions described under this sub-criteria. What equipment does the TSC have to perform such functions?
I.
ACCIDENT ASSESSMENT 1.9 Your radioiodine detection capability, as stated in page 6-19, is orders of magnitude lower than the sensitivity we stated in NUREG-0654. Justify this difference.
J.
PROTECTIVE RESPONSE J.10.b Please provide population distribution maps as described in NUREG-0654.